RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Archive for June, 2009

Billy Mays Funeral Set For Friday In Pennsylvania

MCKEES ROCKS, Pa. — The funeral for television product pitchman Billy Mays will be held Friday in the Pittsburgh suburb where he was born and raised.

The funeral Mass for Mays will be 9:30 a.m. Friday at St. Mary Church in McKees Rocks….

Quinn Threatens To ‘Throw Back’ Budget Without Income Tax Hike

Gov. Pat Quinn said Tuesday that if lawmakers send him a temporary budget that does not include an income tax increase, he would consider keeping the legislature in Springfield for a “double overtime” session.

Illinois’ current budget expires…

Aspen Baker: Common Ground on Abortion

The desire for the emotional well-being of women doesn’t require compromise of human rights or moral values and it doesn’t require the sacrifice of dearly held beliefs.

Frances Beinecke: Four Reasons the Climate Bill Passed This Year

As I savor last Friday’s historic House vote to pass clean energy and climate legislation, I can’t help but think about last June, when leaders…

Searching for a theory of time

Author Dan Falk on how modern theories of time are turning back the clock


Murray targets place in last four

WIMBLEDON
Date: 22 June – 5 July
Coverage: BBC One, BBC Two, BBC HD, Red Button, website streaming (UK only) and text commentary, 5 Live, 5 Live Sports Extra, BBC iPlayer
Tennis on the BBC

By Piers Newbery
BBC Sport at Wimbledon

Andy Murray will attempt to reach the semi-finals of Wimbledon for the first time when he takes on Juan Carlos Ferrero on Centre Court on Wednesday.

The 22-year-old Briton plays Spanish wildcard Ferrero in the second match at around 1530 BST, with Lleyton Hewitt or Andy Roddick waiting in the last four.

Murray beat Ferrero comfortably in the Queen’s Club semi-finals two weeks ago.

"Ferrero is a very tough player. He plays well on any surface – he’s a former world number one," said Murray.

"In every match, regardless of who you’re playing against, especially in an individual sport, anything can happen on the day.

"I played very well at Queen’s but the courts here are a little bit different.

"If I play poorly, there’s a good chance I’ll lose against him. But I’ll try my best to play well. If I do that, I’ve got a chance of winning."

HENMAN ON MURRAY

"Ferrero is the perfect match-up for Murray as he doesn’t have the same firepower as Wawrinka"

Murray is trying to become the first British man to win the Wimbledon singles title since Fred Perry in 1936, and the first Scot ever to win a Grand Slam singles title.

And the interest in the Scot’s progress is such that fans began queuing for the 500 tickets Centre Court tickets available over two days in advance.

His quarter-final follows what is likely to be a serve-dominated contest between second seed Roger Federer and Ivo Karlovic on Centre Court, where play begins at 1300 BST.

It means Murray and Ferrero should avoid the worst of the hot weather forecast for Wednesday, when it is set to be dry with temperatures topping 30C.

The Scot came through a four-hour battle against Stanislas Wawrinka to win his fourth-round match on Monday, finishing late at night in the tournament’s first full floodlit match under Centre Court’s new roof.

"I believe I can win Wimbledon," he said. "That’s not changed since the first match, but I’m going to have to play great tennis to do it."

"I will try to be focused on my return, because his serve has been very, very big"

Ferrero on Murray

Ferrero is a former world number one and French Open champion but the 29-year-old has slipped down the rankings and spoke recently about possibly retiring at the end of 2009.

However, a run to the last four at Queen’s Club appears to have rejuvenated the Spaniard.

He has already beaten 10th seed Fernando Gonzalez and eighth seed Gilles Simon at Wimbledon, and is the first wildcard since eventual champion Goran Ivanisevic in 2001 to reach the last eight.

"I think right now I’m with a little bit more rhythm than at Queen’s," said the Spaniard.

"And of course after the match I played against Murray, I learnt something. That is, I have to do my job and be aggressive all the time, because he likes to play on one level and then he changes the rhythm very fast.

"I think it’s very difficult to play against him because of this, so I will try to be focused on my return, because his serve has been very, very big.

606: DEBATE
Will Murray beat Ferrero

"If I want to win, of course it’s going to be very difficult. He’s at home and he wants to win and everybody wants him to win, so it’s going to be tough, as every match is."

The winner of Murray-Ferrero will face Roddick or Hewitt, who will meet in the second match on Court One.

Former champion Hewitt is unseeded, and had to come back from a thigh injury and two-set deficit against Radek Stepanek in the previous round.

"I have loads of respect for Lleyton and what he’s been able to accomplish," said Roddick, who has won his last four matches against the Australian.

"Everyone knows he’s certainly capable of playing very, very well on this surface."

The first match on Court One sees fourth seed Novak Djokovic take on Tommy Haas, a repeat of the recent Halle final on grass, which the German won.

Opening proceedings on Centre Court is five-time champion Federer’s encounter with Karlovic.

The 30-year-old Croat has hammered down 137 aces in his four matches so far.

But Federer, who has won eight of their nine meetings so far, said: "I like those sort of challenges.

"It’s maybe not the most fun match to go through, but I like to beat this guy because he makes it hard to beat him. He’s become an excellent player.

"He’s not to be underestimated."</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Rachael Freed: Passing on Our Values: The Legacy of Freedom

Our daughters and granddaughters, texting and twittering, can’t imagine a world before computers, or television, a world when American women didn’t have the freedom to vote.

Auren Hoffman: Everything You Learn in College is Wrong

In college you eat huge amounts of instant noodles and cereal. In the real world, you spend your entire paycheck on Whole Foods and tofu.

Obama Family To Vacation In Martha’s Vinyard

President Barack Obama and his family plan to vacation next month on Martha’s Vineyard, Democratic sources said.

More on Barack Obama

Lloyd I. Sederer, MD: Can You Trust Your Psychiatrist?

If you can’t trust big Pharma with its capacity to influence doctors then how can you trust your psychiatrist?

Dilip Hiro: The Clash of Islam and Democracy in Iran

Khamanei has won the immediate battle, but the conflict between hard-liners and reformists is far from over. The demographic make-up of Iran favors their reformist adversaries.

Economy shrinking at 50-year record

Downward revisions to official statistics show output fell 2.4% in the first three months of the year and the recession started three months earlier than thought

The recession facing Britain is even deeper than had been thought and started more than a year ago, it was revealed today

National income fell in the first quarter of this year by 2.4%, the biggest drop since 1958, as the Office for National Statistics revised its initial estimate of 1.9%.

The figures are much worse than expected. Extended to the whole year, the drop in output in the January to March period is now equal to 4.9% – the worst since records began in 1948.

“We hope the recovery comes as soon as possible but sadly we now know this recession has been longer and deeper than we had thought,” said shadow chancellor George Osborne.

“This also means that in the future unemployment will be higher and Labour’s debt crisis will be even worse.”

Although GDP fell 2.4% in the third quarter of 1979 and first quarter of 1974, statisticians said these were rounded from 2.36% or 2.37%. The figure for this year was exactly 2.4%.

The revision is one of the biggest ever made by the ONS and it said the reasons were changes to its estimate of the construction and services sectors.

The ONS also revised down its figure for the second quarter of last year to -0.1% from zero, meaning the recession started earlier than previously thought. And the fourth quarter of 2008 figure was revised down to a fall of 1.8%.

“The recession, which now begins in the second quarter of 2008 rather than the third, is now thought to be quite a bit deeper than previously thought, and is looking ominously like the early 1980s vintage,” said Danny Gabay of Fathom Consulting.

Critics of the Bank of England who called for big interest rate cuts in the first half of last year, will feel justified by the data, since the Bank’s monetary policy committee argued into last autumn that there was little likelihood of a recession occurring and delayed rate cuts until October. In fact, the economy had entered one last spring.

Separately, the Trades Union Congress said that while there were signs of “green shoots” in the economy, this was more to do with an easing of the pace of the fall in output rather than that a big recovery was under way.

“This recession is already worse than the 1990s one and is likely to be worse than that of the 1980s,” said Richard Excel, TUC labour market expert. “It has been very severe and we are probably only half way through. It will be quite some time until employment and growth return to pre-recession levels.”

Paul Gregg, labour market expert from Bristol University, noted that unemployment had started rising earlier in this recession than in previous ones and was “encouraged” that monthly rises in the claimant count appeared to be slowing down.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Yao Ming Could Miss Entire Season With foot injury

Casting a degree of doubt on Yao Ming’s immediate and long-term NBA future, Rockets team physician Tom Clanton on Monday described the extent of the center’s foot injury. And with the league’s free-agent shopping season set to begin at 11 p.m….

Mike Papantonio: Bank of America, Car Thieves, and GOP Lies

Bank of America (B of A) hired Kenneth Lewis as their CEO to carry on the “tough guy” culture that was established by his predecessor,…

Why Gold’s Value Increases During the Later Stages of Deflation

Adrian Ash argues that gold’s value actually increases during periods of deflation:Does the price of gold rise or fall in a deflation? Hint: It’s a trick question, already tripping up plenty of would-be advisors…Absent the money-supply limits which…

Shell should end Nigeria ‘abuse’

Woman walking on oil pipeline

Lobby group Amnesty International has urged the new head of oil firm Royal Dutch Shell to end years of pollution and environmental damage in Nigeria.

Peter Voser takes over on Wednesday, a day after Amnesty released a report saying there was a "human rights tragedy" in Nigeria’s main oil region.

Shell Petroleum Development Company, a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell, is the main operator in the Niger Delta.

It says most of the pollution is the result of attacks and sabotage.

The Amnesty International report says the oil industry has resulted in impoverishment, conflict, human rights abuses in the region.

The report also alleges that the Nigerian government is failing to hold oil companies to account for the pollution they have caused.

The author of the report, Audrey Gaughran, said the majority of cases reported to Amnesty International related to Shell.

"Shell has been operating [in the Niger Delta] for half a century and the problems of the Niger Delta are problems that Shell has to face up to," she told the BBC World Service.

She said Shell must come to grips with its legacy in the Niger Delta.

"It can’t just be a case of ‘Let’s just forget the past and move on.’"

"We’ve asked Peter Voser directly… to come clean on the impact, to disclose information which we believe is a critical part of dealing with the situation in the Niger Delta."

Dangerous conditions

In a written statement provided to the BBC, Shell denied it had been negligent and said that the challenges of conducting operations in the Niger Delta were extreme.

Map

It said repeated kidnappings and assaults on its staff and pipelines made it difficult to carry out maintenance.

"About 85% of the pollution from our operation comes from attacks and sabotage that also puts our staff’s lives and human rights at risk. In the past 10 days we have had five attacks.

"In the last three years, gangs have kidnapped 133 Shell Petroleum Development company employees and contractors while five people working for our joint venture have been killed in assaults and kidnappings in the same period."

These concerns and the general insecurity in the area, according to Shell, prevent it from running maintenance programmes that might otherwise be run in areas of little or no conflict.

Militants in the Niger Delta say they stage attacks on oil installations as part of their fight for the rights of local people to benefit more from the region’s oil wealth. But many attacks are staged for financial gain.

Earlier this month, Shell paid $15.5 million to settle a lawsuit in the US for human rights abuses in Nigeria.

The company is also facing legal action in The Hague concerning repeated oil spills which have damaged the livelihoods of Nigerian fisherfolk and farmers.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Car bomb kills 24 in Baghdad market

Attack comes as Iraqis celebrate withdrawal of US forces from their cities, and hours after deaths in combat of four US soldiers

A car bomb exploded in a crowded outdoor market in the northern city of Kirkuk today killing at least 24 people, police said.

The explosion was a deadly reminder of the challenges facing the Iraqi government even as it celebrated the withdrawal of US combat troops from cities. It marred what had otherwise been a festive day as Iraqis marked what the government had declared to be National Sovereignty Day.

The attack came hours after four US soldiers were killed in combat in Baghdad.

Despite the continued violence, the prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, assured Iraqis government forces taking control of urban areas were more than capable of ensuring security.

“Those who think that Iraqis are not able to protect their country and that the withdrawal of foreign forces will create a security vacuum are committing a big mistake,” he said in a nationally televised address.

He later appeared at a military parade to mark the day in the walled-off Green Zone in central Baghdad, with soldiers and policemen marching in formation while Iraqi helicopters flew overhead.

The withdrawal, which was completed yesterday, was part of a US-Iraqi security pact and marks the first major step toward withdrawing all US forces from the country by 31 December 2011. The US president, Barack Obama, has said all combat troops will be gone by the end of August 2010.

The car bomb exploded as the vegetable and poultry market was crowded with people shopping for their evening meal, a police spokesman, Brigadier General Sarhat Qadir, said.

Police and hospital officials gave the death toll and said about 40 people were wounded.

The bombing was the latest in a series of attacks that have killed more than 250 people since 20 June, including a truck bombing near Kirkuk that killed 82 people.

US and Iraqi officials warned that more violence was likely as suspected Sunni insurgents try to undermine confidence in the government in the days surrounding the withdrawal deadline.

The military said the four US soldiers who were killed yesterday served with the Multi-National Division Baghdad, but declined to provide further details pending notification of their families. It said the soldiers had died as a “result of combat-related injuries”.

The attack was the deadliest against US forces since 21 May, when three soldiers were killed and nine others were wounded in a roadside bombing in southern Baghdad.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


London less happy despite rise in quality of life

Claims air quality has increased challenged by campaigners

Fewer people are happy about living in London than before, despite noted improvements in quality of life issues, according to a report published today.

The London Sustainable Development Commission has compared 23 quality of life indicators with results it recorded in 2005 and depicts a city that has improved in the majority of areas, including an improvement in the air Londoners breathe and a life expectancy in the capital that is higher than the UK average.

However, claims that air quality in the capital has improved were challenged by campaigners, who pointed to a recently published report which suggested the level of “PM10s” – dangerous airborne particles – in the capital was worsening year on year.

Other improvements relate to falling crime levels – crime has been reduced by 20% over the past six years – increased household recycling – up 9.7 percentage points – and a rise in educational attainment for 16-year-olds, which places London above the national average. Despite these recorded improvements, the commission, an independent body, formed in 2002 to advise the mayor of London on ways to make London a sustainable, world-class city, found that satisfaction with London living has dropped from 75% to 73% in the same period.

This was due to “high costs of living and other factors,” according to the report.

The report highlights six other “underperforming areas”: the lack of decent homes; income inequality in the capital, which is the worst in the UK; an increase in fuel poverty among London households; increased waste; housing affordability, and the number of children walking to school.

John Plowman, chair of the London Sustainable Development Commission, said: “To live up to being a truly sustainable, fair and liveable capital we want to see policy solutions which reduce social and economic inequalities, tackle London’s global environmental responsibilities and improve overall quality of life.”

Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, welcomed the “snapshot of London”. “It is good news that in many areas of life for Londoners standards are improving but this report underscores that policymakers cannot be complacent to the challenges that lie ahead,” he said.

“At City Hall we have our shoulders firmly to the wheel to raise the quality of life for Londoners through improved transport, a greener environment, boosting recycling and cutting crime. This comprehensive report will help us refine where we focus attention and resources as we progress this agenda.”

Among the more surprising findings is the claim that air quality has improved since 2005, though the report notes that it is still the worst in the UK.

A report by the London assembly’s environment committee recently warned that pollution kills thousands of people every year in London, far exceeding the accepted figure of about 1,000 fatalities.

A separate report published last week by King’s College London stated that levels of dangerous airborne particles are rising at a rate of 0.4% per year.

Simon Birkett from the Campaign for Clean Air in London said: “King’s College London has confirmed again what we all know – air pollution is bad and getting worse in London despite clear legal obligations on the government to reduce it sharply.”

Jenny Jones, a Green party member of the London assembly, said: “London has failed to meet the European legal limits for particulate PM10 air pollution since 2005 and our government is currently fighting off the threat of court action, so this statement [by the commission] seems incredibly complacent. We are possibly facing the premature death of an estimated 3,000 Londoners this year and the health of Londoners is particularly at risk with the current heatwave. Politicians at all levels of government have failed to take sufficient action to improve air quality and protect the health of Londoners, which is something this report needs to recognise.”

The report also claims that the average life expectancy has increased by 80.08 years to 82 years for women, and from 75.9 years to 77.4 years for men, though it stresses that disparities exist between and within the capital’s 33 London boroughs.

A separate report published last month by the City Parochial Foundation and the New Policy Institute profiling London found that the proportion of men who die before the age of 65 is 20% higher in inner London than the England average.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


The battle for the Parthenon marbles

Following the success of the newly opened Acropolis Museum, Greek officials are more determined than ever to retrieve their missing heritage. Helena Smith reports from Athens

For as long as most Athenians can remember, the intersection of Makriyianni and Dionysiou Areopagitou streets was a nondescript place, the preserve of those bent on illicitly parking their cars on the narrow alleys of the historic Plaka district.

Nine days after the opening of the New Acropolis Museum, this little slice of Athens at the foot of the Acropolis rock is a place transformed. Where vehicles once clogged the streets, there are street cafes, people and performance artists – Greeks such as Anita Papachristou who, like a modern-day pilgrim, makes a point of dropping in to behold the behemoth that looks set to become Greece’s 21st-century shrine. “We waited for it long enough,” she says, looking up at the honey-coloured Parthenon marble, illuminated along the length and breadth of the museum’s upper floor. “And now that it’s here, I can say it’s been worth waiting for.”

The smell of cement still pervades the corridors and stairwells of the three-storey, €130m museum but neither that, nor the scouring Athenian heat, has stopped it being a sell-out success. At what will go down as the museum’s first post-opening press conference (held in a leather-seated auditorium in the bowels of the building) yesterday, Greek officials could scarcely contain their excitement at the “scandalous” number of ticket sales, both at home and abroad.

In the first five days, some 55,000 people rushed to snap up tickets that until the end of 2009 will sell at €1 a piece. Internet interest has also been unexpectedly high, helping to boost the sense that with this new showcase, Athens is on to a winner to retrieve the Parthenon sculptures from the British Museum. “Altogether, 90,822 tickets have been sold,” said the Greek culture minister Antonis Samaras. “From America to Mongolia, Australia to Nepal, internet users have logged into the [museum's] site. I, personally, have received letters of thanks from ordinary people in China. The interest has been phenomenal.”

It’s been more than 30 years in the making, and many Greeks thought they would never see the museum rise from the archaeologically rich but controversial ground on which it now stands beneath the ancient Acropolis. Politicians with an eye to posterity, starting with Melina Mercouri – the late actress who initiated the campaign for the return of the marbles in 1981– were more optimistic. By the time the partly EU-funded building was under construction, Greek officials were arguing as never before that the museum would reinvigorate the movement to win back those parts of the Parthenon frieze that Lord Elgin “hacked, prized and looted” from the monument more than 200 years ago.

Yesterday, as they hit back at the British Museum‘s longstanding argument that Athens has nowhere decent enough to house its Golden Age Wonders, Greek confidence had never been higher. There were not only the numbers, or the polls (including the Guardian’s this week), that proved most Britons were now in favour of the contested masterpieces returning to Greece, there was also the “moral argument”, said Samaras. “The museum has created a strength, a power in its own right for their return,” he added, describing the demand for their repatriation as “universal” and ruling out that Athens would resort to the courts to retrieve the sculptures from Britain.

“It is a question of ethics. Times have changed. Museums including the [New York] Met have returned disputed artworks to their country of origin.” If anything, say Greek classicists, the new museum’s popularity has finally proved that people want to see the treasures not only in context, beneath the temple where they were carved, but as a “narrative whole”, depicting the uninterrupted story of the 106-metre-long Panathenaic procession. In place of those pieces currently held in London, Greek archaeologists have placed crude, alabaster white plastercasts acquired from the British Museum in 1840. In the unforgiving attic light that filters through the museum’s huge glass panes, they stand out like eyesores.

So, is Europe’s longest-running cultural row about to get even more bitter? The Greeks made a point of keeping the museum’s opening ceremony low-key to avoid “contaminating” an otherwise joyous event. Little was made of the fact that only two trustees from the British Museum flew in for the bonanza, even though international debate over ownership of the marbles was revived on the eve of the inauguration, following talk of Britain loaning the marbles to Athens.

But now Greek officials say the gloves are off and, yes, it will get ugly. “We are no longer willing to play the nice guys,” says a senior member of the culture ministry, who is masterminding the government’s strategy on the issue. “The British Museum has lost the argument. It is now on the defensive. In a year’s time, I can assure you, it will want to give the marbles back.”

If the marbles are not returned home soon, private Greek investors apparently have hinted that they will build a Madame Tussauds-like museum down the road, with Lord Elgin hacking the sculptures from the monument as its main exhibit. Presently, the story is doing the rounds as a joke. But the bets are on that it may well happen. And if it does, it will be no laughing matter for the British Museum.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Williams sisters breeze into semis

• Serena Williams makes light of teenage opponent
• Dinara Safina loses first set but defeats Sabine Lisicki

The third seed Venus Williams stayed on course for a third consecutive Wimbledon title with a 6–1, 6–2 victory over Poland’s Agnieszka Radwanska in their quarter-final while Serena Williams kept the possibility of another all-Williams final alive with a straight sets win over Victoria Azarenka of Belarus.

Venus, seeking her sixth title at the All England Club, has not lost a set at Wimbledon since the third round two years ago, and Radwanska, the 11th seed, rarely threatened a shock on a sun-drenched Court One.

“That first set for me was almost perfect,” said Venus. “Do I feel invincible? I’d like to say yes, but I really do work at it. Day in and day out. To clock these matches out takes a lot of work.”

Williams took the first set in just 27 minutes and although the Pole broke early for a 2–0 lead in the second, the seven-times grand slam winner reeled off six straight games to advance to the semi-final, where she will play Dinara Safina..

Serena Williams produced an error-free opening set to draw first blood against Azarenko, who was the first woman from Belarus to reach the quarter-finals at Wimbledon since Natasha Zvereva in 1998. The American made light of the heat to produce a running forehand in the third game and then out-hit her young opponent to gain the first break to lead 4-2. She consolidated the break with a two-handed backhand and broke once more to take the set in just 26 minutes.

Azarenko briefly raised her game in the second set to suggest her straight-sets victory over Williams in Miami earlier this year was no fluke. She threatened to strike back in the opening game of the second set, successfully challenging a baseline call to force her first break points of the match, but Williams simply produced three booming serves to avert the danger.

There was a rare moment of alarm for the American when she went over on her ankle in a baseline tumble but quickly got back on her feet to force a break point. The 19-year-old Azarenko had to dig deep to hold serve in the fourth game after coming up with two double faults, and then pounced on a series of second serves from Williams to achieve the first break of the second set.

But Williams broke back immediately, held to love and then broke the teenager again before serving for the match. Her 6-2, 6-3 victory sets up a meeting with Elena Dementieva and ensures that both Thursday’s semi-finals will be American-Russian affairs,

Dinara Safina recovered from going a set down to the unseeded German Sabine Lisicki to win 6–7, 6–4, 6–1. It was the second day running the Russian had lost the first set and she admitted she would have to serve better to stand a chance against Venus Williams. “My service today, I think I was Santa Claus serving so many double faults,” she said. “On the practice court I don’t serve a single double fault. The serve is there, I just have to put the brain there.

“I know what I have to do, I’m just not doing it. It’s not going to be easy against Venus on grass but I have nothing to lose. I want to go out there and enjoy it and show my best tennis. I’m happy that I’m in the semis – I was tough mentally and I think that was the key today.”

Safina’s compatriot Elena Dementieva reached her second successive Wimbledon semi-final with a straighforward victory over Italian Francesca Schiavone on Court One. The Olympic champion and fourth seed won 6–2, 6–2 to set-up a semi-final against Serena Williams.

“I’m just very happy to be in the semi-final again,” said Dementieva. “It was a tough match despite the score. The weather conditions were tough today so I’m glad to go through. I was trying to play very aggressive and make it as quick as possible because it is very hot out there. I am sure it will be a tough challenge for me against Serena, as she likes to play on grass. But I just want to give myself another try.”


Women’s quarter-finals results

Serena Williams (US) beat Victoria Azarenka (Belarus) 6-2, 6-3

Elena Dementieva (Russia) beat Francesca Schiavone (Italy) 6-2, 6-2

Dinara Safina (Russia) beat Sabine Lisicki (Germany) 6-7, 6-4, 6-1

Venus Williams (US) beat Agnieszka Radwanska (Poland) 6-1, 6-2

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds