Pet Airways offers jet-set pets travel with furry frills, from boarding lounge and pre-flight walks to onboard lunch and loo breaks
One trip for their Jack Russell terrier in a plane’s cargo hold was enough to convince Alysa Binder and Dan Wiesel that pet owners needed a better solution for transporting their animals from one location to another.
Yesterday, the first flight of Pet Airways, the service devised by the married couple, and the first-ever all-pet airline, took off from Republic airport, in Farmingdale, New York.
Binder and Wiesel used their background in consulting and their business know-how to found Pet Airways in 2005 and have spent the last four years designing their fleet of five planes to suit the animal travellers, as well as dealing with Federal Aviation Administration regulations and setting up the airport schedules.
The couple say they have been “overwhelmed” with the response to the new service with flights on the airline already booked up for the next two months.
Pet Airways serves New York, Washington, Chicago, Denver, and Los Angeles, and charges from $149 (£91) for a one-way fare, which is comparable to pet fees charged by the largest US airlines.
Some commercial airlines allow a limited number of small pets to fly in the cabin, but some animals are required to travel in the cargo hold.
Pet Airways says it offers a quite different service. Dogs and cats will fly in the main cabin of a freight plane that has been re-arranged and lined with carriers in place of seats. The animals, up to 50 a time, will be escorted to the plane by attendants who will check them every 15 minutes during the flight.
The pets get pre-boarding walks and “bathroom breaks”. And at each of the five airports it serves, the company offers a pet lounge for animals waiting to board.
The company will operate out of smaller, regional airports in the five cities, which will mean an extra trip for most people due to fly themselves. And stops in cities along the way mean the pets will take longer to reach the destination than their owners. A trip from New York to Los Angeles, will take about 24 hours, said Pet Airways. On that route, pets will stop in Chicago for a loo break, playtime and dinner, before bunking down for the night and arrival the next day.
Amanda Hickey, of Portland, Oregon, is one of the new airline’s first customers. Her seven-year-old terrier-pinscher mix, Mardi, and Penny, a two-year-old puggle (a pug crossed with a beagle) were soon to take their first flight. Hickey said the service would be a welcome alternative to flying her dogs in cargo from Denver to Chicago to stay with her family while she and her fiance go to Aruba to get married. “For a little bit more money, I have peace of mind,” she said.
It was the stressful experience of transporting their Jack Russell, Zoe, in a cargo hold, that spurred Binder and Wiesel to start their airline. Binder said it was worrying not being able to check on the dog at all. “One time in cargo was enough for us,” she said, walking through an airplane hangar as Zoe trotted in front of her. “We wanted to do something better.”
The company, which will begin with one flight in each of its five cities, might add more flights and cities. In the next three years, Binder hopes the schedule will expand to 25 destinations.




Field notes for the cow crisis
The row over cow-inflicted injuries threatens a return to rural segregation – we need not wired-off paths but common sense
It goes against the grain to think of the English countryside as dangerous, rather than gently beautiful and full of natural wonders for those who keep their eyes peeled. We don’t have the poison ivy or bears that encourage Americans to stick to carefully organised trails.
But a recent ruling at Preston county court has put the wind up a lot of people. Farmer John Cameron was found liable over a cow-trampling incident which has led to the seriously injured victim, Sheila McKaskie, claiming £1m.
A lifetime’s reporting has left me wary of commenting on any judgment unless I was in court. Cases are so individual that the notion of a binding precedent – which is the worry aired about this one – seldom holds water.
Another lifelong habit, trespassing carefully, has also taught me not to generalise about landowners and ramblers, except to say that it is good for them to meet.
An example of this is the farmland in the Vale of Mowbray, which I got to know when compiling a guide to the Coast-to-Coast Walk. Unexpectedly, considering that the path traverses wilderness in the Lake District, Pennines and North York Moors, it is the section that demands the most careful navigation.
The slight roll in the land means that a succession of farms rise and fall as you go, appearing and disappearing like ships on a swell. As you make for each in turn, you cannot help but see how each field is used and imagine yourself in the farmer’s place.
You will probably meet at least one person earning their living from the land; and at Stanhowe there is even a discreet signboard in a hedge explaining how the farm works, complete (when I passed by) with a ballpoint pen for suggestions and the farmer’s mobile phone number. Very sensible, when up to 10,000 people a year are crossing working land.
Very different, too, from the situation when the path’s pioneer Alfred Wainwright (no relation) came this way in 1971-72. Mutual suspicion meant that no fewer then eight miles had to be plodded along roads in this section. Wainwright was big and determined, but he didn’t want to confront bulls and barbed wire. Today, thanks to patient work by landowners, walkers and North Yorkshire county council, the whole 23 miles between Richmond and Ingleby Cross is on footpaths.
A return to rural segregation is the danger behind the cow controversy, if people are panicked by Preston (where the farmer is appealing against the judgment) or the recent well-publicised cow attacks on David Blunkett and a vet out with her dogs on the Pennine Way in Wensleydale, where tragically she was killed. In eight years, there have been 19 deaths and 481 injuries caused by cows, including farmworkers. Enough to warrant more education and discussion like this; but not to lead to wired-off paths (there is a ghastly example between Robin Hood’s Bay and Boggle Hole on the Yorkshire coast) or a rash of permanent warning notices without the discretion shown at Stanhowe.
Liability fears and lawyers are the only dangers that have really increased, in this as in so many other, metaphorical, fields. Dogs are an issue but simply one of responsible ownership (personally, I wish that pets of all kinds didn’t exist, but they do, and most of them have lessons to teach about animal care, the natural world and the unreality of Peter Rabbit).
Tread softly, said Yeats; walk cheerfully over the world, said George Fox. Be reasonable, says common law. Farmers will seldom put cows or horses with young calves or foals in a footpath field if they have an alternative; when they do, they would be well advised to put up a temporary warning notice.
For their part, walkers in doubt (large parties, with children or dogs or just nervous) should detour or knock on the farm door and ask for advice. That is the kind of thing a court considers on the very rare occasions when things go so far.