RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Animals’

Pets-only airline makes maiden flight

Pet Airways offers jet-set pets travel with furry frills, from boarding lounge and pre-flight walks to onboard lunch and loo breaks

One trip for their Jack Russell terrier in a plane’s cargo hold was enough to convince Alysa Binder and Dan Wiesel that pet owners needed a better solution for transporting their animals from one location to another.

Yesterday, the first flight of Pet Airways, the service devised by the married couple, and the first-ever all-pet airline, took off from Republic airport, in Farmingdale, New York.

Binder and Wiesel used their background in consulting and their business know-how to found Pet Airways in 2005 and have spent the last four years designing their fleet of five planes to suit the animal travellers, as well as dealing with Federal Aviation Administration regulations and setting up the airport schedules.

The couple say they have been “overwhelmed” with the response to the new service with flights on the airline already booked up for the next two months.

Pet Airways serves New York, Washington, Chicago, Denver, and Los Angeles, and charges from $149 (£91) for a one-way fare, which is comparable to pet fees charged by the largest US airlines.

Some commercial airlines allow a limited number of small pets to fly in the cabin, but some animals are required to travel in the cargo hold.

Pet Airways says it offers a quite different service. Dogs and cats will fly in the main cabin of a freight plane that has been re-arranged and lined with carriers in place of seats. The animals, up to 50 a time, will be escorted to the plane by attendants who will check them every 15 minutes during the flight.

The pets get pre-boarding walks and “bathroom breaks”. And at each of the five airports it serves, the company offers a pet lounge for animals waiting to board.

The company will operate out of smaller, regional airports in the five cities, which will mean an extra trip for most people due to fly themselves. And stops in cities along the way mean the pets will take longer to reach the destination than their owners. A trip from New York to Los Angeles, will take about 24 hours, said Pet Airways. On that route, pets will stop in Chicago for a loo break, playtime and dinner, before bunking down for the night and arrival the next day.

Amanda Hickey, of Portland, Oregon, is one of the new airline’s first customers. Her seven-year-old terrier-pinscher mix, Mardi, and Penny, a two-year-old puggle (a pug crossed with a beagle) were soon to take their first flight. Hickey said the service would be a welcome alternative to flying her dogs in cargo from Denver to Chicago to stay with her family while she and her fiance go to Aruba to get married. “For a little bit more money, I have peace of mind,” she said.

It was the stressful experience of transporting their Jack Russell, Zoe, in a cargo hold, that spurred Binder and Wiesel to start their airline. Binder said it was worrying not being able to check on the dog at all. “One time in cargo was enough for us,” she said, walking through an airplane hangar as Zoe trotted in front of her. “We wanted to do something better.”

The company, which will begin with one flight in each of its five cities, might add more flights and cities. In the next three years, Binder hopes the schedule will expand to 25 destinations.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Pets-only airline makes maiden flight

Pet Airways offers jet-set pets travel with furry frills, from boarding lounge and pre-flight walks to onboard lunch and loo breaks

One trip for their Jack Russell terrier in a plane’s cargo hold was enough to convince Alysa Binder and Dan Wiesel that pet owners needed a better solution for transporting their animals from one location to another.

Yesterday, the first flight of Pet Airways, the service devised by the married couple, and the first-ever all-pet airline, took off from Republic airport, in Farmingdale, New York.

Binder and Wiesel used their background in consulting and their business know-how to found Pet Airways in 2005 and have spent the last four years designing their fleet of five planes to suit the animal travellers, as well as dealing with Federal Aviation Administration regulations and setting up the airport schedules.

The couple say they have been “overwhelmed” with the response to the new service with flights on the airline already booked up for the next two months.

Pet Airways serves New York, Washington, Chicago, Denver, and Los Angeles, and charges from $149 (£91) for a one-way fare, which is comparable to pet fees charged by the largest US airlines.

Some commercial airlines allow a limited number of small pets to fly in the cabin, but some animals are required to travel in the cargo hold.

Pet Airways says it offers a quite different service. Dogs and cats will fly in the main cabin of a freight plane that has been re-arranged and lined with carriers in place of seats. The animals, up to 50 a time, will be escorted to the plane by attendants who will check them every 15 minutes during the flight.

The pets get pre-boarding walks and “bathroom breaks”. And at each of the five airports it serves, the company offers a pet lounge for animals waiting to board.

The company will operate out of smaller, regional airports in the five cities, which will mean an extra trip for most people due to fly themselves. And stops in cities along the way mean the pets will take longer to reach the destination than their owners. A trip from New York to Los Angeles, will take about 24 hours, said Pet Airways. On that route, pets will stop in Chicago for a loo break, playtime and dinner, before bunking down for the night and arrival the next day.

Amanda Hickey, of Portland, Oregon, is one of the new airline’s first customers. Her seven-year-old terrier-pinscher mix, Mardi, and Penny, a two-year-old puggle (a pug crossed with a beagle) were soon to take their first flight. Hickey said the service would be a welcome alternative to flying her dogs in cargo from Denver to Chicago to stay with her family while she and her fiance go to Aruba to get married. “For a little bit more money, I have peace of mind,” she said.

It was the stressful experience of transporting their Jack Russell, Zoe, in a cargo hold, that spurred Binder and Wiesel to start their airline. Binder said it was worrying not being able to check on the dog at all. “One time in cargo was enough for us,” she said, walking through an airplane hangar as Zoe trotted in front of her. “We wanted to do something better.”

The company, which will begin with one flight in each of its five cities, might add more flights and cities. In the next three years, Binder hopes the schedule will expand to 25 destinations.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Animals Sunbathing (SLIDESHOW, VOTE)

Last week, we saw animals going for a swim, and this week, these animals seem to be basking in all of summer’s glory. Irrespective of their stripes or spots, they are all loving the sunshine!

More on Animals

Giraffe Birth At Zoo Caught On Tape (VIDEO)

More on Animals

Week in wildlife

Our pick of images from the natural world


Cash-Strapped Boston Zoo May Be Forced To Close Doors, Euthanize Animals

The Franklin Park Zoo, an inner-city Boston institution that has drawn generations of city and suburban families, may be forced to close its doors and possibly euthanize some of its animals as a result of the deep budget cuts imposed by Govern…

Montana and Idaho plan wolf hunt

Rocky Mountain states’ plans for an open-season wolf hunt in September criticised by environmentalists

It is a clash of civilisations as old as the colonisation of the American west – wolves v humans – and it has entered into a new and more violent phase as two Rocky Mountain states moved to allow the first open hunt in years of an animal that was once driven to extinction.

The states of Montana and Idaho are going ahead with plans for an open-season hunt against wolves in September, in which licensed members of the public can take part.

The decisions follow a ruling earlier this year by the Obama administration, widely criticised by environmentalists, to remove wolves from the list of endangered species in the Rocky Mountain states. The interior secretary, Ken Salazar, was endorsing a decision by the Bush adminstration.

Montana wildlife commissioners voted yesterday to allow hunters to kill about 75 wolves, which is about 15% of the state’s population. Officials in Idaho will meet later this month to decide on their quota. But earlier plans called for hunting of up to 250 wolves.

Federal and state government biologists claim the wolf population in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho has grown so rapidly since the species was re-introduced to the region in the mid-1990s that it has become a choice between ranchers’ family pets and livestock, and wolves.

“The population has been growing 22% a year. We have more wolves in more places than we ever hoped for,” said Ed Bangs, the wolf recovery co-ordinator for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. “The issue is what is the best way to manage wolves into the future now that the population is fully recovered.”

He said there are about 1,650 wolves in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana, and their existing habitat cannot sustain a much larger population without bringing the animals further into conflict with ranching operations.

“If you live in an urban area where your only exposure to wolves is watching them on TV and seeing them running in a national park, it is very easy to be supportive of wolves,” he said. “The debate right now isn’t about the biology. People think it is morally wrong to kill wolves because it reminds them of pet dogs or people because wolves live in packs like families.”

But critics say the administration based its decision on science that is decades out of date, and does not take into account a growing body of evidence for the importance of protecting genetic diversity. If the wolf population dwindles too much – or if wolves survive only in isolated pockets – inbreeding would endanger their future.

“The recovery plan for wolves in the Rocky Mountains dates from the 1980s and has no reference to modern genetics,” said Michael Robinson, a conservationist for the Center for Biological Diversity.

The government recovery plan for wolves in the three Rocky Mountain states envisaged a much smaller population than the current population – perhaps 300 wolves overall, Robinson said. That translates into perhaps 10 breeding pairs in each state, he said. “That is completely inadequate to avoid inbreeding and fatal genetic defects.”

He argued that the government already had in place measures to protect humans from expanding wolf populations.

The administration already allows selective hunting of wolves – but only if ranchers claim their flocks are at risk. Government wildlife officials killed 265 wolves in the Rockies last year, including 21 entire wolf packs, Bangs said. In the midwest, where there are about 4,000 wolves spread across Minnesota and other states, government biologists conduct aerial culls of wolves.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Montana and Idaho plan wolf hunt

Rocky Mountain states’ plans for an open-season wolf hunt in September criticised by environmentalists

It is a clash of civilisations as old as the colonisation of the American west – wolves v humans – and it has entered into a new and more violent phase as two Rocky Mountain states moved to allow the first open hunt in years of an animal that was once driven to extinction.

The states of Montana and Idaho are going ahead with plans for an open-season hunt against wolves in September, in which licensed members of the public can take part.

The decisions follow a ruling earlier this year by the Obama administration, widely criticised by environmentalists, to remove wolves from the list of endangered species in the Rocky Mountain states. The interior secretary, Ken Salazar, was endorsing a decision by the Bush adminstration.

Montana wildlife commissioners voted yesterday to allow hunters to kill about 75 wolves, which is about 15% of the state’s population. Officials in Idaho will meet later this month to decide on their quota. But earlier plans called for hunting of up to 250 wolves.

Federal and state government biologists claim the wolf population in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho has grown so rapidly since the species was re-introduced to the region in the mid-1990s that it has become a choice between ranchers’ family pets and livestock, and wolves.

“The population has been growing 22% a year. We have more wolves in more places than we ever hoped for,” said Ed Bangs, the wolf recovery co-ordinator for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. “The issue is what is the best way to manage wolves into the future now that the population is fully recovered.”

He said there are about 1,650 wolves in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana, and their existing habitat cannot sustain a much larger population without bringing the animals further into conflict with ranching operations.

“If you live in an urban area where your only exposure to wolves is watching them on TV and seeing them running in a national park, it is very easy to be supportive of wolves,” he said. “The debate right now isn’t about the biology. People think it is morally wrong to kill wolves because it reminds them of pet dogs or people because wolves live in packs like families.”

But critics say the administration based its decision on science that is decades out of date, and does not take into account a growing body of evidence for the importance of protecting genetic diversity. If the wolf population dwindles too much – or if wolves survive only in isolated pockets – inbreeding would endanger their future.

“The recovery plan for wolves in the Rocky Mountains dates from the 1980s and has no reference to modern genetics,” said Michael Robinson, a conservationist for the Center for Biological Diversity.

The government recovery plan for wolves in the three Rocky Mountain states envisaged a much smaller population than the current population – perhaps 300 wolves overall, Robinson said. That translates into perhaps 10 breeding pairs in each state, he said. “That is completely inadequate to avoid inbreeding and fatal genetic defects.”

He argued that the government already had in place measures to protect humans from expanding wolf populations.

The administration already allows selective hunting of wolves – but only if ranchers claim their flocks are at risk. Government wildlife officials killed 265 wolves in the Rockies last year, including 21 entire wolf packs, Bangs said. In the midwest, where there are about 4,000 wolves spread across Minnesota and other states, government biologists conduct aerial culls of wolves.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Field notes for the cow crisis

The row over cow-inflicted injuries threatens a return to rural segregation – we need not wired-off paths but common sense

It goes against the grain to think of the English countryside as dangerous, rather than gently beautiful and full of natural wonders for those who keep their eyes peeled. We don’t have the poison ivy or bears that encourage Americans to stick to carefully organised trails.

But a recent ruling at Preston county court has put the wind up a lot of people. Farmer John Cameron was found liable over a cow-trampling incident which has led to the seriously injured victim, Sheila McKaskie, claiming £1m.

A lifetime’s reporting has left me wary of commenting on any judgment unless I was in court. Cases are so individual that the notion of a binding precedent – which is the worry aired about this one – seldom holds water.

Another lifelong habit, trespassing carefully, has also taught me not to generalise about landowners and ramblers, except to say that it is good for them to meet.

An example of this is the farmland in the Vale of Mowbray, which I got to know when compiling a guide to the Coast-to-Coast Walk. Unexpectedly, considering that the path traverses wilderness in the Lake District, Pennines and North York Moors, it is the section that demands the most careful navigation.

The slight roll in the land means that a succession of farms rise and fall as you go, appearing and disappearing like ships on a swell. As you make for each in turn, you cannot help but see how each field is used and imagine yourself in the farmer’s place.

You will probably meet at least one person earning their living from the land; and at Stanhowe there is even a discreet signboard in a hedge explaining how the farm works, complete (when I passed by) with a ballpoint pen for suggestions and the farmer’s mobile phone number. Very sensible, when up to 10,000 people a year are crossing working land.

Very different, too, from the situation when the path’s pioneer Alfred Wainwright (no relation) came this way in 1971-72. Mutual suspicion meant that no fewer then eight miles had to be plodded along roads in this section. Wainwright was big and determined, but he didn’t want to confront bulls and barbed wire. Today, thanks to patient work by landowners, walkers and North Yorkshire county council, the whole 23 miles between Richmond and Ingleby Cross is on footpaths.

A return to rural segregation is the danger behind the cow controversy, if people are panicked by Preston (where the farmer is appealing against the judgment) or the recent well-publicised cow attacks on David Blunkett and a vet out with her dogs on the Pennine Way in Wensleydale, where tragically she was killed. In eight years, there have been 19 deaths and 481 injuries caused by cows, including farmworkers. Enough to warrant more education and discussion like this; but not to lead to wired-off paths (there is a ghastly example between Robin Hood’s Bay and Boggle Hole on the Yorkshire coast) or a rash of permanent warning notices without the discretion shown at Stanhowe.

Liability fears and lawyers are the only dangers that have really increased, in this as in so many other, metaphorical, fields. Dogs are an issue but simply one of responsible ownership (personally, I wish that pets of all kinds didn’t exist, but they do, and most of them have lessons to teach about animal care, the natural world and the unreality of Peter Rabbit).

Tread softly, said Yeats; walk cheerfully over the world, said George Fox. Be reasonable, says common law. Farmers will seldom put cows or horses with young calves or foals in a footpath field if they have an alternative; when they do, they would be well advised to put up a temporary warning notice.

For their part, walkers in doubt (large parties, with children or dogs or just nervous) should detour or knock on the farm door and ask for advice. That is the kind of thing a court considers on the very rare occasions when things go so far.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Field notes for the cow crisis

The row over cow-inflicted injuries threatens a return to rural segregation – we need not wired-off paths but common sense

It goes against the grain to think of the English countryside as dangerous, rather than gently beautiful and full of natural wonders for those who keep their eyes peeled. We don’t have the poison ivy or bears that encourage Americans to stick to carefully organised trails.

But a recent ruling at Preston county court has put the wind up a lot of people. Farmer John Cameron was found liable over a cow-trampling incident which has led to the seriously injured victim, Sheila McKaskie, claiming £1m.

A lifetime’s reporting has left me wary of commenting on any judgment unless I was in court. Cases are so individual that the notion of a binding precedent – which is the worry aired about this one – seldom holds water.

Another lifelong habit, trespassing carefully, has also taught me not to generalise about landowners and ramblers, except to say that it is good for them to meet.

An example of this is the farmland in the Vale of Mowbray, which I got to know when compiling a guide to the Coast-to-Coast Walk. Unexpectedly, considering that the path traverses wilderness in the Lake District, Pennines and North York Moors, it is the section that demands the most careful navigation.

The slight roll in the land means that a succession of farms rise and fall as you go, appearing and disappearing like ships on a swell. As you make for each in turn, you cannot help but see how each field is used and imagine yourself in the farmer’s place.

You will probably meet at least one person earning their living from the land; and at Stanhowe there is even a discreet signboard in a hedge explaining how the farm works, complete (when I passed by) with a ballpoint pen for suggestions and the farmer’s mobile phone number. Very sensible, when up to 10,000 people a year are crossing working land.

Very different, too, from the situation when the path’s pioneer Alfred Wainwright (no relation) came this way in 1971-72. Mutual suspicion meant that no fewer then eight miles had to be plodded along roads in this section. Wainwright was big and determined, but he didn’t want to confront bulls and barbed wire. Today, thanks to patient work by landowners, walkers and North Yorkshire county council, the whole 23 miles between Richmond and Ingleby Cross is on footpaths.

A return to rural segregation is the danger behind the cow controversy, if people are panicked by Preston (where the farmer is appealing against the judgment) or the recent well-publicised cow attacks on David Blunkett and a vet out with her dogs on the Pennine Way in Wensleydale, where tragically she was killed. In eight years, there have been 19 deaths and 481 injuries caused by cows, including farmworkers. Enough to warrant more education and discussion like this; but not to lead to wired-off paths (there is a ghastly example between Robin Hood’s Bay and Boggle Hole on the Yorkshire coast) or a rash of permanent warning notices without the discretion shown at Stanhowe.

Liability fears and lawyers are the only dangers that have really increased, in this as in so many other, metaphorical, fields. Dogs are an issue but simply one of responsible ownership (personally, I wish that pets of all kinds didn’t exist, but they do, and most of them have lessons to teach about animal care, the natural world and the unreality of Peter Rabbit).

Tread softly, said Yeats; walk cheerfully over the world, said George Fox. Be reasonable, says common law. Farmers will seldom put cows or horses with young calves or foals in a footpath field if they have an alternative; when they do, they would be well advised to put up a temporary warning notice.

For their part, walkers in doubt (large parties, with children or dogs or just nervous) should detour or knock on the farm door and ask for advice. That is the kind of thing a court considers on the very rare occasions when things go so far.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Rejected koala twin reared by hand

Koala twin reared by hand in captivity in Australia after mother throws her out of the pouch


Woman jailed over rabbit obsession

Court hears woman was on probation after being found with 150 rabbits and dozens of bodies at her home

An American woman obsessed with rabbits has been sent to jail after police found her in a hotel room with more than a dozen of the animals – in violation of her parole conditions.

Miriam Sakewitz, 47, was jailed for 90 days by a Washington county court judge.

The woman’s obsession with rabbits was exposed in 2006 when police found more than 150 of them in her home and dozens more bunny bodies in freezers. She was arrested on accusations of animal neglect and placed on five years’ probation, on condition that she stay away from rabbits.

But on 16 June police arrested Sakewitz after she called a maintenance worker to her room in the Portland suburb of Tigard to fix a broken television. The worker saw and smelled the rabbits some of them hopping free.

Police spokesman Jim Wolf said officers removed eight adult rabbits, five young ones and a dead one from the hotel room in the latest incident.

Washington county probation services said Sakewitz had undergone a mental health assessment but that no treatment was recommended.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Shrinking sheep riddle solved

Shorter, milder winters caused by global warming to blame for steady decrease in size of St Kilda sheep, experts say

The mysterious shrinking sheep of St Kilda sounds like a job for super-sleuth Sherlock Holmes.

The case involves a rare herd of wild sheep on the remote Scottish island – known in Scottish Gaelic as Hirta – that are refusing to bow to conventional evolutionary pressure, which says big is best. Instead, they have steadily decreased in size since the 1980s.

Scientists have now stepped in to solve the conundrum, and fingered the culprit as the new Moriarty of mankind: global warming.

The experts say shorter and milder winters mean that lambs do not need to put as much weight on during their first few months of life. Smaller animals that would have perished in harsh winters a few decades ago can now survive to their first birthday. As a result, the average weight of the sheep has dropped by 81g each year.

The difference is too small to see with the naked eye, but it is important because it shows how animal populations can respond to climate change. Tim Coulson, a biologist at Imperial College London who worked on the study, said: “If animals can respond [to climate change] and can respond fairly rapidly, then evolution could play a role in helping them to adapt.” The results appear in the journal Science.

Biologists have reported that several species of birds and fish are changing size and shape, which could be down to global warming. Coulson said it was difficult to say what the response of the St Kilda sheep could mean for other species.

Their island home, St Kilda, is just “vegetation and sheep” he said. In other cases, predators and competition for food from other animals complicate the picture and make it difficult to tease out the influence of changing climate.

The study looked at a herd of wild Soay sheep on Hirta that biologists have studied since 1985. Dogs are forbidden on the island, so the scientists acted as human sheepdogs to herd the animals, which are expert jumpers, towards areas where they could be weighed. “These aren’t fluffy white sheep, these are small and brown and wild animals,” Coulson said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


How to keep pets cool on hot days

Pets rely on their owners to keep them safe during heatwaves. Rachel Dixon offers a brief guide to what you should and shouldn’t be doing as the temperature soars

What does your pet like to do when it’s sunny? How do you stop it getting too hot? Post your comments below.

Britain is in the grip of a heatwave, and measures have been introduced to protect vulnerable groups, such as older people and young children, from its effects. But what about another at-risk group: our pets?

You may think that looking after your pets in hot weather comes down to common sense, but as the death of two police dogs this week shows, it never hurts to go back over the basics. So here’s a brief guide to keeping dogs, cats and other common pets cool this summer.

Dogs

Dogs aren’t much good at keeping themselves cool, so you’ll need to help them. Here’s how:

Don’t leave your dog in a car, even for a few minutes. An open window or a windshield screen isn’t enough to keep the car cool. According to the RSPCA, if it’s 22C outside, within an hour it can be 47C inside a car. Dogs die this way every year – don’t let yours be one of them.

Don’t even leave your dog in a glass conservatory or a caravan. The same rules apply as for cars.

Do provide your dog with plenty of water, both in the house and on walks. If you are leaving your dog at home alone, make sure its bowl can’t be knocked over.

Do keep one room in your house cool and well-ventilated by drawing curtains and opening windows if there is a breeze, so your dog can lie down there if it is getting hot.

Don’t leave your dog outside all day. If it is unavoidable, ensure it has shade and water and check on it regularly.

Do keep an eye on your dog if it is outside. Animals will try to drink anything if they are thirsty. For example, they like the sweet taste of anti-freeze.

Don’t take your dog for a long walk in the heat of the day. Go in the early morning or late evening, and make the walk shorter than usual.

Do apply pet sunscreen if your dog has a light-coloured nose or ears. Mammals burn just like humans, and can even develop skin cancer.

Do have long-coated dogs clipped, and groom all breeds regularly.

Don’t treat all dogs equally. Take extra care with fat or muscular dogs, those with short or flat noses, long-haired breeds, young puppies, old dogs, and those with a disease or who are on medication.

Don’t ignore the signs of heatstroke. The RSPCA has issued a checklist: heavy panting; profuse salivation; a rapid pulse; very red gums/tongue; lethargy; lack of coordination; reluctance or inability to rise after collapsing; vomiting; diarrhoea; loss of consciousness in extreme circumstances.

Do take immediate action if your dog is displaying any of these symptoms. Cool it down gradually and then take it straight to the vets – heatstroke can be fatal. To cool your dog, douse it in cool water (not cold) and let it drink small quantities of cool water, until its breathing has steadied.

Do be aware that up to a third of dogs may suffer from hayfever, which can lead to skin irritations that could become infected. Take your dog to the vet if it is scratching excessively.

Cats

Cats enjoy warm weather. They are also good at keeping themselves cool if necessary, with a little help from humans (so perhaps they are intelligent after all). Here’s how to help protect them from excessive heat:

Don’t let your cat go outside between 10am and 3pm.

Do apply a pet sunscreen, which can’t be licked off, to the nose and ears of pale-coloured cats when they do go outside.

Do keep the blinds closed and the curtains shut to keep the house cool for your cat. Keep the windows closed if it is hotter outside than in.

Do let your cat choose a cool place to lie down. They will naturally gravitate towards a slate floor or a fan in summer, just as they will curl up in a warm place in winter.

Do provide your cat with plenty of water, in various positions around the house. Cats often prefer their water to be placed away from their food.

Don’t worry if your cat is sleepy during the day. Cats need 16 hours of sleep a day and will sensibly nap even more on a hot day, rather than rushing around getting hotter.

Don’t worry if your cat seems to be grooming itself more than usual. This is a cooling mechanism similar to sweating: as the saliva evaporates off its fur, the cat will cool down.

Do pay attention to your cat’s feet. Cats, like dogs and mice, have their sweat glands on their paws. If your cat is leaving wet paw prints, it is sweating and will need to replenish its fluids. You can try cooling it down by dipping its paws in water, but this may not be appreciated …

Don’t worry if your cat starts panting. Cats pant more rarely than dogs, but will pant to take on cooler air if they are particularly hot. Heavy panting could be cause for concern, however (see heatstroke, above).

Small furries

Don’t get lax with hygiene: hot weather results in more flies and maggots and can lead to flystrike, an often fatal condition that affects rabbits.

Do groom your pet and brush out loose hair. Consider having long-haired rabbits and guinea pigs trimmed for the summer.

Do keep hutches and runs in the shade all day. Move them as the sun moves round if necessary.

Don’t keep the hutch on the ground: improve ventilation by putting it on bricks or similar.

Do keep water topped up, and be extra-vigilant about evaporation.

Do give small animals pieces of water-rich fruit and vegetables, such as celery and apple, to keep them hydrated.

Do provide a ceramic tile or a frozen bottle of water for your pet to sit or lean on.

Do use a misting spray to cool off larger pets, such as rabbits. This can be used on dogs, too – remember to avoid the face.

Horses

Do provide your horse with plenty of water and a salt lick.

Don’t leave your horse in a field without any shade.

Do protect your horse from flies. Consider investing in a fly fringe, an anti-fly rug and some fly repellant.

Don’t let your horse put on too much weight from the lush summer grass. Overweight horses are more at risk of overheating.

Do keep your horse’s feet hydrated – ask your farrier for advice.

Don’t let your horse’s muzzle burn. Use a suitable sunscreen on it and other areas of exposed skin.

More information

RSPCA
Cats Protection
Blue Cross
Cats, Dogs and Peace of Mind
All About Pets
Defra
Dove Lewis
Pet Connection
The Cat Site

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


How to keep pets cool on hot days

Pets rely on their owners to keep them safe during heatwaves. Rachel Dixon offers a brief guide to what you should and shouldn’t be doing as the temperature soars

What does your pet like to do when it’s sunny? How do you stop it getting too hot? Post your comments below.

Britain is in the grip of a heatwave, and measures have been introduced to protect vulnerable groups, such as older people and young children, from its effects. But what about another at-risk group: our pets?

You may think that looking after your pets in hot weather comes down to common sense, but as the death of two police dogs this week shows, it never hurts to go back over the basics. So here’s a brief guide to keeping dogs, cats and other common pets cool this summer.

Dogs

Dogs aren’t much good at keeping themselves cool, so you’ll need to help them. Here’s how:

Don’t leave your dog in a car, even for a few minutes. An open window or a windshield screen isn’t enough to keep the car cool. According to the RSPCA, if it’s 22C outside, within an hour it can be 47C inside a car. Dogs die this way every year – don’t let yours be one of them.

Don’t even leave your dog in a glass conservatory or a caravan. The same rules apply as for cars.

Do provide your dog with plenty of water, both in the house and on walks. If you are leaving your dog at home alone, make sure its bowl can’t be knocked over.

Do keep one room in your house cool and well-ventilated by drawing curtains and opening windows if there is a breeze, so your dog can lie down there if it is getting hot.

Don’t leave your dog outside all day. If it is unavoidable, ensure it has shade and water and check on it regularly.

Do keep an eye on your dog if it is outside. Animals will try to drink anything if they are thirsty. For example, they like the sweet taste of anti-freeze.

Don’t take your dog for a long walk in the heat of the day. Go in the early morning or late evening, and make the walk shorter than usual.

Do apply pet sunscreen if your dog has a light-coloured nose or ears. Mammals burn just like humans, and can even develop skin cancer.

Do have long-coated dogs clipped, and groom all breeds regularly.

Don’t treat all dogs equally. Take extra care with fat or muscular dogs, those with short or flat noses, long-haired breeds, young puppies, old dogs, and those with a disease or who are on medication.

Don’t ignore the signs of heatstroke. The RSPCA has issued a checklist: heavy panting; profuse salivation; a rapid pulse; very red gums/tongue; lethargy; lack of coordination; reluctance or inability to rise after collapsing; vomiting; diarrhoea; loss of consciousness in extreme circumstances.

Do take immediate action if your dog is displaying any of these symptoms. Cool it down gradually and then take it straight to the vets – heatstroke can be fatal. To cool your dog, douse it in cool water (not cold) and let it drink small quantities of cool water, until its breathing has steadied.

Do be aware that up to a third of dogs may suffer from hayfever, which can lead to skin irritations that could become infected. Take your dog to the vet if it is scratching excessively.

Cats

Cats enjoy warm weather. They are also good at keeping themselves cool if necessary, with a little help from humans (so perhaps they are intelligent after all). Here’s how to help protect them from excessive heat:

Don’t let your cat go outside between 10am and 3pm.

Do apply a pet sunscreen, which can’t be licked off, to the nose and ears of pale-coloured cats when they do go outside.

Do keep the blinds closed and the curtains shut to keep the house cool for your cat. Keep the windows closed if it is hotter outside than in.

Do let your cat choose a cool place to lie down. They will naturally gravitate towards a slate floor or a fan in summer, just as they will curl up in a warm place in winter.

Do provide your cat with plenty of water, in various positions around the house. Cats often prefer their water to be placed away from their food.

Don’t worry if your cat is sleepy during the day. Cats need 16 hours of sleep a day and will sensibly nap even more on a hot day, rather than rushing around getting hotter.

Don’t worry if your cat seems to be grooming itself more than usual. This is a cooling mechanism similar to sweating: as the saliva evaporates off its fur, the cat will cool down.

Do pay attention to your cat’s feet. Cats, like dogs and mice, have their sweat glands on their paws. If your cat is leaving wet paw prints, it is sweating and will need to replenish its fluids. You can try cooling it down by dipping its paws in water, but this may not be appreciated …

Don’t worry if your cat starts panting. Cats pant more rarely than dogs, but will pant to take on cooler air if they are particularly hot. Heavy panting could be cause for concern, however (see heatstroke, above).

Small furries

Don’t get lax with hygiene: hot weather results in more flies and maggots and can lead to flystrike, an often fatal condition that affects rabbits.

Do groom your pet and brush out loose hair. Consider having long-haired rabbits and guinea pigs trimmed for the summer.

Do keep hutches and runs in the shade all day. Move them as the sun moves round if necessary.

Don’t keep the hutch on the ground: improve ventilation by putting it on bricks or similar.

Do keep water topped up, and be extra-vigilant about evaporation.

Do give small animals pieces of water-rich fruit and vegetables, such as celery and apple, to keep them hydrated.

Do provide a ceramic tile or a frozen bottle of water for your pet to sit or lean on.

Do use a misting spray to cool off larger pets, such as rabbits. This can be used on dogs, too – remember to avoid the face.

Horses

Do provide your horse with plenty of water and a salt lick.

Don’t leave your horse in a field without any shade.

Do protect your horse from flies. Consider investing in a fly fringe, an anti-fly rug and some fly repellant.

Don’t let your horse put on too much weight from the lush summer grass. Overweight horses are more at risk of overheating.

Do keep your horse’s feet hydrated – ask your farrier for advice.

Don’t let your horse’s muzzle burn. Use a suitable sunscreen on it and other areas of exposed skin.

More information

RSPCA
Cats Protection
Blue Cross
Cats, Dogs and Peace of Mind
All About Pets
Defra
Dove Lewis
Pet Connection
The Cat Site

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Florida girl strangled by pet python

Child was already dead when paramedics arrived at her home, said local official

A 12-foot (3.6-metre) pet Burmese python broke out of an aquarium and strangled a 2-year-old girl in her bedroom today at a central Florida home, authorities said.

Shaunia Hare was already dead when paramedics arrived at the home, Lieutenant Bobby Caruthers of the Sumter county sheriff’s office said.

Charles Jason Darnell, the snake’s owner and the boyfriend of Shaunia’s mother, discovered the snake missing from its aquarium and went to the girl’s room, where he found it on the girl and bite marks on her head, Caruthers said. Darnell, 32, stabbed the snake until he was able to pry the child away.

Authorities remained outside the small tan home, bordered by cow pastures this afternoon, awaiting a search warrant to remove the snake from the home. It was unclear if it was still alive. Oxford is about 50 miles north-west of Orlando.

Darnell did not have a permit for the snake, which would be a second-degree misdemeanour, said Joy Hill, a spokeswoman with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

He has not been charged, but Caruthers said investigators were looking into whether there was child neglect or if any other laws were broken.

The Humane Society of the United States said including today’s death, at least 12 people have been killed in the US by pet pythons since 1980, including five children.

Burmese pythons are not native to Florida, but they easily survive in the state and can reach a length of 26 feet (nearly 8 metres) and weigh more than 200 lbs (90 kilogrammes).
Some owners have freed pythons into the wild and a population of them has taken hold in the Everglades.

Scientists also speculate a bevy of Burmese pythons escaped in 1992 from pet shops battered by Hurricane Andrew and have been reproducing since.

“It’s becoming more and more of a problem, perhaps no fault of the animal, more a fault of the human,” said Jorge Pino, a state wildlife commission spokesman.

“People purchase these animals when they’re small. When they grow, they either can’t control them or release them.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Puffins get satnav to trace decline

Severin Carrell meets the zoologist investigating the Farne islands’ fall in puffin numbers


Eco fears over invading ladybirds

A voracious predator, the Asian harlequin ladybird has spread across the UK since its arrival from continental Europe in 2004

Millions of very hungry ladybirds are poised to create ecological havoc for hundreds of Britain’s native species, scientists warn today.

Experts said the anticipated warm summer would provide the perfect conditions for the Asian harlequin ladybird to breed and prepare for a springtime assault. “They are creating a huge genetic stock ready for next year,” said Helen Roy, a scientist with the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.

The insect, a voracious predator, has spread across the UK since its arrival from continental Europe in 2004. The bugs have been spotted as far north as Orkney, though they remain strongest in south-east England, where they have overrun many of London’s parks.

“We believe that the negative impacts of the harlequin on Britain will be far-reaching and disruptive, with the potential to affect over a thousand of our native species,” she said. “It’s a big and voracious predator, it will eat lots of different insects, soft fruit and all kinds of things.”

Unlike British ladybirds, such as the most common seven-spot, the harlequin does not need a cold winter for adults to reach sexual maturity, and so be able to breed. “That gives them a massive advantage,” Roy said.

The ladybird, originally from Asia, was introduced to Holland and other European countries to control aphids on crops. From there, it crossed the English Channel on the wind, or hidden on fruit and flowers.

A public survey launched in 2005 has tracked its progress using some 30,000 online records. Roy said the results revealed a “staggering expansion”. Scientists fear the harlequins will push out natural rivals through competition for food. They can munch through more than 12,000 aphids a year, as well as feed on other species such as lacewing larvae. The harlequin has even been recorded eating the large caterpillar of a brimstone butterfly.

Scientists from five organisations will present the latest findings on the spread of the harlequin this week at the Royal Society summer exhibition, and warn its arrival will mean “one winner, 1,000 losers”.

Scientists are exploring whether harlequin numbers could be controlled using their few native enemies, such as fungal disease, male-killing bacteria and parasitic wasps and flies. One idea is to encourage the transmission of a sexually transmitted mite that makes some ladybirds infertile.

The researchers said people should not take matters into their own hands. Vigilante action against the harlequin invaders would make no difference to the overall population and could inadvertently kill similar-looking native species.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


DNA reveals trail of ivory smugglers

Scientists have used a revolutionary genetic technique to pinpoint the area of Africa where smugglers are slaughtering elephants to feed the worldwide illegal ivory trade.

Using a DNA map of Africa’s elephants, they have found that most recent seizures of tusks can be traced to animals that had grazed in the Selous and Niassa game reserves on the Tanzania and Mozambique borders.

The discovery suggests that only a handful of cartels are responsible for most of the world’s booming trade in illegal ivory and for the annual slaughter of tens of thousands of elephants. The extent of this trade is revealed through recent seizures of thousands of tusks in separate raids on docks in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, the Philippines and Japan. These were aimed at satisfying the far east’s growing appetite for ivory, a new status symbol for the middle classes of the region’s swelling industrialised economies.

As a result, ivory prices have soared from $200 a kilogram in 2004 to more than $6,000. At the same time, scientists estimate that between 8% and 10% of Africa’s elephants are now being slaughtered each year to meet demand.

“In the past, law enforcement agencies – including Interpol – thought these shipments of ivory had been put together by traders cherry-picking small stockpiles across Africa,” said Professor Sam Wasser, director of the University of Washington’s Centre for Conservation Biology, where the DNA elephant map was developed.

“Our work shows that isn’t true. The vast majority of poaching is being carried out by a few big organisations – possibly one or two major syndicates – that are targeting one area and then hammering its elephants. It is grim, but it also suggests we can target our anti-poaching efforts very specifically by focussing efforts on these regions.”

At present, Tanzania is at the centre of the world’s ivory slaughter. However, other work by Wasser and his team indicates that different areas, including parts of Zambia and Malawi, have been targeted in the recent past.

Ivory poaching was halted by an international campaign in the 1990s after it reached a peak between 1979 and 1989, when more than 700,000 elephants were killed for their tusks. However, aid that helps African nations fight poachers has dried up and the illegal ivory trade has returned to its previous high levels.

Killing for tusks is a particularly gruesome trade. Elephants are highly intelligent animals whose sophisticated social ties are exploited by poachers. They will often shoot young elephants to draw in a grieving parent, which is then killed for its tusks. “Our estimates suggest that more than 38,000 elephants were killed using techniques such as this in 2006 and that the annual death rate is even higher today,” said Wasser.

His team’s technique – outlined in the current issue of Scientific American – involves two separate sets of analyses. First, volunteers and researchers across Africa collected samples of elephant dung. Each contains plentiful amounts of DNA from cells, sloughed from the intestines of individual animals. These provide material for DNA fingerprints, which have since been mapped for the whole of Africa. Animals from one area have very similar DNA fingerprints, the researchers have found.

As part of the second analysis, a section of tusk seized from smugglers is ground up and its DNA is carefully extracted. Again a DNA fingerprint is made and compared with those on the dung map, in order to pinpoint the origin of the elephant.

In this way, Wasser and his colleagues analysed ivory seized when more than 11 tonnes of tusks were found in containers in raids on Taiwan and Hong Kong docks in July and August 2006. About 1,500 tusks were discovered and all were traced to elephants from the Selous game reserve, a Unesco heritage site in Tanzania, and the nearby Niassa game reserve in Mozambique. However, Japanese authorities – who had made another seizure of ivory that summer in Osaka – refused to co-operate and have since burnt the 260 tusks they found before their origins could be established. “You can draw your own conclusions,” said Wasser.

Since then, major seizures of ivory have been made in Vietnam and the Philippines, both this year, and Wasser and his team are now preparing to use their DNA map to trace its origins.

“Ivory is now traded globally in the same illegal manner as drugs and weapons,” said Wasser. “It is shameful that this has happened and we need to press the countries whose elephants are being targeted this way and get them to halt this trade.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Cows on list of countryside dangers

A herd trampling on a woman vet and injuries inflicted on former home secretary David Blunkett highlight the risk of attacks by cattle, especially if calves or dogs are nearby. Anushka Asthana reports on the need for ramblers to be ‘animal aware’

Thomas De Quincey, the 19th-century critic and essayist, once stated: “Cows are amongst the gentlest of breathing creatures.” Many might disagree.

Farm worker Mike Scriven, for instance. He was left with severe bruising last week after being chased across a field by a 450kg cow. Scriven, 46, who was trapped under the animal’s body for almost an hour, escaped only by gouging its eyes repeatedly.

Or David Blunkett, the former cabinet minister, who is nursing two broken ribs after being charged by a cow while walking his guide dog, Sadie, in the Peak District this month.

A third incident ended in tragedy last weekend. Liz Crowsley, 49, a vet, was trampled to death by a herd of cows in the Yorkshire Dales. Her two dogs, a spaniel and collie cross, fled to safety.

Perhaps the animal for which De Quincey professed a “deep love” is not always as docile as city dwellers might think. Figures reveal that attacks by cows are by no means unusual. According to data released by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), there have been 67 incidents in the past five years in which a member of the public has reported being injured by cattle. In six of the cases, which do not cover 2009, the person was killed.

The risk is even greater for farm workers whose injuries are recorded separately. Over the same period there were 23 fatal incidents involving farmers and their employees, another 300 that resulted in “major” harm and 277 in which the injury took more than three days to heal. Far more go unreported.

Blunkett has been inundated with messages from people who have suffered similar attacks. “I have had letters flooding in – from people telling me about personal experiences, family experiences, who have been in hospital for three weeks after an incident, who have had family members killed, and a couple of letters from people whose dogs were crushed,” he said. People had also thanked him for drawing attention to the problem: “If I hadn’t been who I am, no one would know about it. Although I went to hospital I doubt they would have reported it. There is usually a category for road traffic accident – but for being crushed by a cow?”

Blunkett, MP for Sheffield Brightside, was out walking with his son on his 62nd birthday when they came across the cattle. They put Sadie on a lead to walk around the animals when one cow broke away and charged towards them. “My son was trying to protect me but the cow decided to have a dive at the dog and it knocked me down,” he said. “I think it kicked me because I have bruising all over and a couple of broken ribs.”

After the incident, Blunkett said he had found out there was a new cross-breed of cow. “A particular strain from Europe that is more aggressive,” he said, arguing that in such cases temporary electric fencing should be used. “Most of the rights of way in the Peak District cross over fields, so I think fencing should be considered, and walkers have to be extremely careful – especially if they have dogs.”

Since right to roam legislation opened up vast areas of the countryside, the HSE has published guidance about the “potential hazards” posed by cattle. It tells farmers to “plan and take action”. Tips include assessing if the animals are generally placid or well behaved, erecting temporary fencing and placing signposts on paths. “If you have an animal known or suspected to be aggressive, then you should not keep it in a field that is used by the public,” it warns.

Tony Mitchell, from the HSE’s agriculture and food sector safety section, said: “Cattle are classed as a non-dangerous species and by and large are generally docile. Their inquisitive nature is often mistaken for aggression. However, if they feel threatened by unusual disturbance, such as dogs, or when maternal instincts are aroused, then they may react in a threatening manner.”

According to the HSE, the two most common factors in attacks involving members of the public are “cows with calves” and “walkers with dogs”.

“Over the years a lot of people have been under the misconception that a bull in a field is the most dangerous thing,” said Alistair Bull, livestock manager at Thelveton Farms, near Diss in Norfolk. “The most serious incidents take place when there are groups of suckler cows that have calves with them – because they have that maternal instinct to protect their calves. You would not walk into a pen with elephants or giraffes when they have just given birth.”

Bull said he advised walkers not to let dogs off their leads when close to cattle. “What happens is the dog gets chased and it runs straight back to its owner with a cow in hot pursuit. And cows do not tend to attack singly. If you think of wildlife programmes, the matriarch comes forward with her infantry behind. To a person from town, that dog is part of the family so their first instinct is to rescue it, but the next minute they will have 750kg cows charging around them. It is a recipe for disaster.”

Part of the problem, said Bull, was that more and more people coming to the countryside were “less animal aware”. But he admitted it was not just the public who were at risk. The “most scary” moment of his life was when he and a colleague used a dog to help round up a herd of suckler cows. “Within 20 seconds one of the cows attacked the dog. Then the others started bellowing – a warning cry. The dog came galloping back to us and within seconds we were surrounded by 40 cows. We were petrified – we thought we’d had it. They turned from docile cows to a mob.”

Adrian Morris of the Ramblers’ Association said walkers should appreciate that the countryside was a working environment. “We get two to three queries a week related to incidents involving animals, with one or two a year that have been serious. Quite often we hear stories about people having to run across a field to the nearest stile. It is difficult to know how much is perception and how much reality.”

A spokesman for the National Farmers’ Union added: “Attacks by cattle are extremely rare. If you feel threatened, just carry on as normal, do not run, move to the edge of the field, and if possible find another way round. And remember to close the gate.”

Others pointed out that livestock were also at risk from ignorance of country ways. “We are aware of many reports of animals being attacked by dogs off the lead, or of dogs being injured when a herd is frightened and pursues the dog,” said Katy Geary, a spokeswoman for the RSPCA. “We believe that tens of thousands of livestock are killed or maimed. Terrified sheep and cattle have been chased over cliffs and into rivers, had their throats and intestines ripped out, or been caused to miscarry through dog attacks. People find it hard to believe their pet can be a hazard to livestock.”

Whatever triggered the attack on him, Blunkett knows he is lucky to be alive. “I didn’t realise the seriousness at first – I had no idea I had broken my ribs.” He says he has lived in the countryside since he was a boy and had never been worried about bulls or cows. Along with others, he may now steer well clear.

Six tips for safety

If confronted by cows…

• Do be prepared for cattle to react to your presence, particularly if you are with a dog.

• Do move quickly and quietly – and if possible walk around them.

• Do keep your dog close and under proper control.

• Don’t hang on to your dog if you are threatened by animals – let it go.

• Don’t put yourself at risk. Find another way round and rejoin the footpath as soon as possible.

• Don’t panic. Most cows will stop before they reach you. If they follow, just walk on quietly.

• Report any problems to the highway authority.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds