RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Automotive industry’

Ford profits from debt restructuring

• Ford still has $21bn in the bank
• Carmaker aims to break even in 2011
• Firm may have benefited from fears over Chrysler and GM

The US carmaker Ford offered a chink of light in the gloom engulfing Detroit by delivering a quarterly profit of $2.26bn (£1.37bn), though the gain was entirely down to a one-off financial boost from a debt restructuring which offset losses on the sale of vehicles.

Ford’s market share of crucial US vehicle sales rose by two percentage points to 16.4% as its rivals, General Motors and Chrysler, struggled their way through bankruptcy. But the company still lost just over $1bn on its core business of selling cars and trucks.

The firm, the second-largest American carmaker after GM, is the only one of Detroit’s “Big Three” to have refused any state aid. Chief executive Alan Mulally, conceded that conditions remain tough. “While the business environment remained extremely challenging around the world, we made significant progress on our transformation plan,” he said.

Through a series of transactions to reduce debt by swapping loans for shares, Ford made an exceptional gain of $2.7bn. The company burnt through $1bn of cash in the second quarter, but still has $21bn in the bank and reiterated its goal of breaking even in 2011. Anecdotal evidence has suggested that some US motorists turned to Ford to avoid cash-strapped companies because of concern that warranties could be compromised at Chrysler and GM.

In Europe, Ford’s profits fell from $582m to $138m despite the popularity of a new version of the Fiesta, which has racked up sales of 300,000 since its introduction in the autumn making it Europe’s second-best-selling car. The Fiesta and the Focus are soon to be introduced to the US as Ford tries to satisfy demand among American motorists for smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Analysts believe Ford has sufficient firepower to maintain its standalone stance. In a recent research note, Eric Selle, a debt analyst at JP Morgan, said: “We believe Ford has the liquidity to make it to 2010, when its cash burn should improve.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Ford profits from debt restructuring

• Ford still has $21bn in the bank
• Carmaker aims to break even in 2011
• Firm may have benefited from fears over Chrysler and GM

The US carmaker Ford offered a chink of light in the gloom engulfing Detroit by delivering a quarterly profit of $2.26bn (£1.37bn), although the gain was entirely down to a one-off financial boost from a debt restructuring which offset losses on the sale of vehicles.

Ford’s market share of crucial US vehicle sales rose by two percentage points to 16.4% as its rivals, General Motors and Chrysler, struggled their way through bankruptcy. But the company still lost just over $1bn on its core business of selling cars and trucks.

The firm, which is the second largest US carmaker behind GM, is the only one of Detroit’s “Big Three” to have refused any state aid. Ford’s chief executive, Alan Mulally, conceded that conditions remain tough. “While the business environment remained extremely challenging around the world, we made significant progress on our transformation plan‚” he said.

Through a series of transactions to reduce debt by swapping loans for shares, Ford made an exceptional gain of $2.7bn. The company burnt through $1bn of cash in the second quarter but still has $21bn in the bank and it reiterated its goal of breaking even in 2011.

Anecdotal evidence has suggested that some US motorists turned to Ford to avoid cash-strapped companies because of concern that warranties could be compromised at Chrysler and GM.

In Europe, Ford’s profits fell from $582m to $138m, despite the popularity of a new version of the Fiesta, which has racked up sales of 300,000 since its introduction in the autumn, making it Europe’s second-best-selling car. The Fiesta and the Focus are soon to be introduced to the US as Ford tries to satisfy demand among American motorists for smaller, more fuel-efficient, vehicles.

Analysts believe Ford has sufficient firepower to maintain its standalone stance. In a recent research note, Eric Selle, a debt analyst at JP Morgan, said: “We believe Ford has the liquidity to make it to 2010, when its cash burn should improve.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Porsche boss exits with €50m payoff

Porsche directors agree sale of a stake in the German company to Qatari investors to strengthen capital base

Porsche’s chief executive has quit with a €50m (£43m) payoff as the debt-laden luxury car firm prepares to join forces with Volkswagen.

Wendelin Wiedeking and the chief financial officer, Holger Härter, were forced out of Porsche after their gamble to seize control of VW backfired. Their departures were decided in the early hours of this morning following a 15-hour boardroom meeting, at which Porsche directors also agreed the sale of a stake in the German company to Qatari investors to strengthen its capital base.

Wiedeking and Härter “have come to the conclusion in recent weeks that it would be better for the strategic development of Porsche” if they left, the company said in a brief statement.

Wiedeking, who had taken Porsche from near-bankruptcy to become the most profitable carmaker in the world, will receive a payoff of €50m. Porsche said a substantial proportion of the payout will go to a charitable foundation, but this may not prevent outrage over another so-called “reward for failure”. He had already earned €80m last year, thanks to a contract that awarded him almost 1% of pre-tax profits.

Last year Wiedeking was being lauded for his audacious attempt to seize control of VW by acquiring share options in the company. When the plan hatched by Wiedeking and Härter came to light, hedge funds who had short-sold VW were forced to buy the shares back at a substantial premium – giving Porsche a €6.8bn (£5.86bn) windfall. Wiedeking was even declared European businessman of the year for 2009 by Fortune magazine. But acquiring these options left Porsche with €10bn of debt, which it is struggling to manage in the current economic climate.

The two German car firms started discussing a merger in May, but the deal soon turned rancorous and by the end of last month Porsche was accusing VW of attempted extortion.

The battle is spiced by the fact that VW’s chairman, Ferdinand Piëch, is the grandson of Porsche founder Ferdinand Porsche and owns 13% of the company, which itself owns 51% of VW. Piëch wants to form an integrated car manufacturing group, in which Porsche would sit alongside nine other brands including Seat, Bentley and Audi.

The Qatar deal should ease negotiations over Porsche’s merger with VW. It is the first time that an outsider has been allowed to take a stake in Porsche. Analysts believe the Gulf state investors could eventually own 15% of an enlarged VW, with the Porsche and Piëch families owning 40%. The state of Lower Saxony, which is a major investor in VW, would own 20%.

Shares in Porsche fell almost 5% in early trading before recovering, while VW shares were down almost 3% shortly before midday.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Porsche boss exits with €50m payoff

Porsche directors agree sale of a stake in the German company to Qatari investors to strengthen capital base

Porsche’s chief executive has quit with a €50m payoff as the debt-laden luxury car firm prepares to join forces with Volkswagen.

Wendelin Wiedeking and the chief financial officer, Holger Härter, were forced out of Porsche after their gamble to seize control of VW backfired. Their departures were decided in the early hours of this morning following a 15-hour boardroom meeting, at which Porsche directors also agreed the sale of a stake in the German company to Qatari investors to strengthen its capital base.

Wiedeking and Härter “have come to the conclusion in recent weeks that it would be better for the strategic development of Porsche” if they left, the company said in a brief statement.

Wiedeking, who had taken Porsche from near-bankruptcy to become the most profitable carmaker in the world, will receive a payoff of €50m (£43m). Porsche said a substantial proportion of the payout will go to a charitable foundation, but this may not prevent outrage over another so-called “reward for failure”. He had already earned €80m last year, thanks to a contract that awarded him almost 1% of pre-tax profits.

Last year Wiedeking was being lauded for his audacious attempt to seize control of VW by acquiring share options in the company. When the plan hatched by Wiedeking and Härter came to light, hedge funds who had short-sold VW were forced to buy the shares back at a substantial premium – giving Porsche a €6.8bn windfall. Wiedeking was even declared European businessman of the year for 2009 by Fortune magazine. But acquiring these options left Porsche with over $10bn (£6.1bn) of debt, which it is struggling to manage in the current economic climate.

The two German car firms started discussing a merger in May, but the deal soon turned rancorous and by the end of last month Porsche was accusing VW of attempted extortion.

The battle is spiced by the fact that VW’s chairman, Ferdinand Piëch, is the grandson of Porsche-founder Ferdinand Porsche and owns 13% of the company, which itself owns 51% of VW. Piëch wants to form an integrated car manufacturing group, in which Porsche would sit alongside nine other brands including Seat, Bentley and Audi.

The Qatar deal should ease negotiations over Porsche’s merger with VW. It is the first time that an outsider has been allowed to take a stake in Porsche. Analysts believe the Gulf state investors could eventually own 15% of an enlarged VW, with the Porsche and Piëch families owning 40%. The state of Lower Saxony, which is a major investor in VW, would own 20%.

Shares in Porsche fell almost 5% in early trading, while VW lost 4%.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Government welcomes Nissan jobs

Sunderland visit comes as government names north-east as Britain’s second low-carbon economic area

Carmaker Nissan has pledged to invest more than £200m in a new rechargeable battery factory in Sunderland boosting the north-east of England’s drive to become a leading centre for green technology.

The region hopes to swap a legacy of shipbuilding, steam engines and coalmining for a pioneering role in the manufacture of electric cars and lorries.

Nissan’s announcement of plans for a rechargeable lithium-ion battery plant was accompanied by Gordon Brown’s confirmation that the government is making the north-east the UK’s Low Carbon Economic Area specialising in “ultra-low carbon vehicles.”

Against a backdrop of job losses and unrelenting uncertainty for workers at UK car factories, the prime minister hailed Nissan’s new battery plant as a step towards economic recovery.

He sought to raise hopes the Japanese company could choose its north-east base for a new European green car operation over a rival facility in Spain.

“Nissan’s investment in a new battery plant and its hope to start producing electric vehicles here in Sunderland is great news for the local economy, creating up to 350 direct jobs and creating and safeguarding hundreds more in the associated supply chain,” said Brown.

“Sunderland could now be a strong contender to produce electric vehicles for Nissan in Europe, and we will continue to work with Nissan to ensure this happens.”

Visiting Nissan’s Sunderland plant, Business Secretary Peter Mandelson said the north-east was already a specialised region for green cars.

The region’s designation as a Low Carbon Economic Area will mean establishing a training centre to teach the manufacture and repair of green cars, creating a research and development hub which collates work from five universities on using low carbon cars and opening a test track to try out new vehicles.

The north-east is the second such “economic area” to be created by the government after the South West of England – a centre of marine and tidal energy schemes.

Mandelson hopes the north-east green cars project will attract foreign investment and secure the UK’s place as “a global leader in high-tech manufacturing and automotive industries.”

Local government officials hailed the Low Carbon initiative as potentially creating 10,000 jobs over five years – a huge morale boost to an area hit by the rapid decline of its manufacturing industry and wider economic turmoil.

Margaret Fay, chairman of the One North East regional development agency drew parallels with the north-east’s industrial heyday.

“The first steam engines came from the north-east, we are good at firsts. We were the centre of excellence all those years ago with Stephenson and the Rocket. It’s like history repeating itself for the next generation.”

“We see this as the next iteration of the north-east economy. We have been through the very heavy industries of shipbuilding, steel, coalmining etc… Clearly manufacturing is at the heart of what we have always done in the region and this takes us back into what really are our core competencies. But this is manufacturing for the future.”

The agency has aspirations to turn the north-east into Britain’s green car training centre as demand rises for mechanics able to fix a new breed of electric vehicles.

“The training centre will go right from basic training, through apprenticeships, right up to masters and PhD’s,” said Fay.

The planned research and development centre will look into aspects of electric cars such as how far they can travel between charges.

AA president Edmund King says his group will feed its research into both the training and research centres.

“It was important to get a motoring organisation involved because electric vehicles will only be successful if consumers use them, understand them and trust them,” said King.

He quotes AA research suggesting almost two-thirds of drivers would consider buying a more fuel efficient car. Drivers in the North East and Northern Ireland were most likely to consider buying a green car.

But others are more sceptical that electric cars are worthy of such “green” government investment. Stephen Glaister director of the RAC Foundation points out the power to charge batteries will most likely be generated from coal or gas. “I think it is entirely unclear whether electric cars have anything to offer.”

“This may be about being seen to do something, it may be about creating new jobs, but I imagine it’s very risky in terms of the particular technology they are going into. There’s a long history of governments supporting different bits of the motor industry and having them fail.”

North-eastern company Smith Electric Vehicles, the world’s largest manufacturer of electric commercial vehicles, has questions about the government’s green car plans for other reasons.

Managing director Geoff Allison was puzzled as to why the government was not looking at manufacturers’ more urgent needs.

“Here today, now, we need investment. We have got electric vehicles, we need volume orders, we need subsidies. We need incentive from the government to help us get commercial vehicles on the road quicker. “In Europe they are all way ahead of us in terms of acceptability of electric vehicles.”

If we aren’t given support, the French will overtake us. You won’t be buying a British built electric vehicle, you’ll be buying a French one,” he says


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Nissan’s plug-free electric car

The Japanese carmaker’s wireless system employs the same electromagnetic field technology used to charge an electric toothbrush

Nissan has developed a revolutionary plug-free technology that it claims will make charging electric cars easier and faster. The wireless charging system is based on the concept of inductive charging, the same electromagnetic field technology used to charge an electric toothbrush. Nissan has scaled it up for use in their Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) electric car, which can charge in a compatible parking bay without the need for wires. Today’s electric car owners, by contrast, have to carry a mains plug aboard to recharge.

David Bott, director of innovation programmes at the Technology Strategy Board, said: “If you look at handheld gadgets, inductive charging is a proven technology – the fundamental science says that it will work. I suspect you’ll end up plugging electric cars in at night for efficiency, and by day using inductive for on-the-go recharging.”

Nissan has ambitions beyond mere wireless charging bays. It hopes to scale the technology up even further as a series of plates laid into the surface of designated electric vehicle lanes on our roads and motorways, theoretically enabling motorists to charge as they drive. However, Nissan admits that it still has no idea on how much it would cost, how long the designated lane would have to be, or how fast the battery could be recharged.

Bott said he was sceptical that such charging lanes would be practical: “It’s scientifically feasible, but it’s whether it’s scalable and feasible is another matter.”

Nissan is grappling with its recent consumer research, which revealed that 61% of potential electric car customers were most worried about the inconvenience of recharging. As well as inductive charging, its technological solutions include developing fast-charging facilities, which they hope to see in place in shopping car parks and motorway service stations. “So while you’re shopping, or having a cup of tea, the battery will refill to 80% of its capacity, in about 25 minutes,” explained Larry Haddad, general manager of product strategy and planning at Nissan Europe.

In addition to these charging innovations, Nissan believes the ZEV has what it takes to compete against established electric models such as the TH!NK City and G-Wiz. Nissan claims it will be the first “dedicated” electric car on the market, arguing that most rival cars have been rehashes of existing models.

The ZEV is a five-seater family-sized car with a top speed of 90mph, a battery range of around 100 miles and surprisingly impressive acceleration. Redmer van der Meer, Nissan’s European electric vehicle product manager, said that he is confident the range will be significantly extended in the next few years, and that cars will be built so new, improved batteries can be retro-fitted. Van der Meer said the car is deliberately conventional in style: “We don’t want to make a shock in the market, an egg-shaped car or something. We want to make a transition. You could do mad things but we really don’t want to.”

Nissan’s electric car is set to go on sale in the US and Japan next year, before arriving in the UK and rest of Europe by 2012. Pricing is yet to be announced.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Phoenix Four net another £3.5m

Further return for buyers of failed car manufacturer

The Phoenix Four business executives who bought MG Rover from BMW in 2000 have received a further £3.5m in dividends and share payments in the four years since its collapse.

The cash has come from their investment in MGR Capital, a car finance joint venture with a subsidiary of banking group HBOS, now part of Lloyds TSB.

MGR Capital, which bought the Rover cars finance and lease loan book from BMW for £313m in 2001, was wound up last year. The Phoenix Four could also be entitled to a further windfall of £12m from the assets from the wind-up according to company accounts, although their spokesman disputed this figure.

Government inspectors completed a four-year inquiry last week into the collapse of MG Rover and the role of the Phoenix Four: John Towers, Nick Stephenson, John Edwards and Peter Beale. But the report will not be released until a further investigation has been undertaken by the Serious Fraud Office.

When Phoenix Venture Holdings, (PVH) the four men’s master company, and MG Rover’s parent bought Rover Financial Services, it said the acquisition was a significant achievement.

But the interest in MGR Capital was acquired independently of PVH through a company called the Phoenix Partnership. This is owned partly by Edwards and Beale who were both directors of MGR Capital, with the four men each taking £500,000 of preference capital in the business. HBOS owns the balance of the company. The preference shares have provided a dividend of around £100,000 a year for each of the Phoenix Four. Late last year they redeemed the preference shares, netting them a collective windfall of £2m.

Redemption of the preference shares was a precursor to the winding up of MGR Capital. The company was no longer trading because the loan book had been exhausted.

Net assets stood at £23m at the end of 2008. A simple extrapolation suggests the shares held by Edwards and Beale would net them a return of around £12m from the wind-up of MGR Capital. Given that HBOS and Phoenix each own 50% of MGR Capital’s shares this suggests they would each be entitled to half the company’s net assets.

In a written statement, a Phoenix spokesman confirmed the businessmen had received £1.5m in dividends from MGR Capital as well as their original £500,000 investments each. But he said there had been no further funds distributed to the group. “Any other share redemption will be retained by HBOS.”

At the time of the Rover collapse, the Phoenix Four pledged to put any of the assets and funds recovered into a trust to benefit employees.

If the four benefit from their share of the assets left in MGR Capital, it will swell the bounty from their association with MG Rover to £50m, although they dispute this figure. They are also accused of taking more than £40m in pay and pensions from the collapsed carmaker.

In a dossier issued by their public relations advisers the four argued they had been victims of a smear campaign. “The mythical figure of ‘£40m’ in payments to the Phoenix directors is entirely inaccurate and is based on erroneous and mischievous DTI press briefings. It is not supported by published Phoenix Venture Holdings accounts,” it said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Phoenix Four net another £3.5m

Further return for buyers of failed car manufacturer

The Phoenix Four business executives who bought MG Rover from BMW in 2000 have received a further £3.5m in dividends and share payments in the four years since its collapse.

The cash has come from their investment in MGR Capital, a car finance joint venture with a subsidiary of banking group HBOS, now part of Lloyds TSB.

MGR Capital, which bought the Rover cars finance and lease loan book from BMW for £313m in 2001, was wound up last year. The Phoenix Four could also be entitled to a further windfall of £12m from the assets from the wind-up according to company accounts, although their spokesman disputed this figure.

Government inspectors completed a four-year inquiry last week into the collapse of MG Rover and the role of the Phoenix Four: John Towers, Nick Stephenson, John Edwards and Peter Beale. But the report will not be released until a further investigation has been undertaken by the Serious Fraud Office.

When Phoenix Venture Holdings, (PVH) the four men’s master company, and MG Rover’s parent bought Rover Financial Services, it said the acquisition was a significant achievement.

But the interest in MGR Capital was acquired independently of PVH through a company called the Phoenix Partnership. This is owned partly by Edwards and Beale who were both directors of MGR Capital, with the four men each taking £500,000 of preference capital in the business. HBOS owns the balance of the company. The preference shares have provided a dividend of around £100,000 a year for each of the Phoenix Four. Late last year they redeemed the preference shares, netting them a collective windfall of £2m.

Redemption of the preference shares was a precursor to the winding up of MGR Capital. The company was no longer trading because the loan book had been exhausted.

Net assets stood at £23m at the end of 2008. A simple extrapolation suggests the shares held by Edwards and Beale would net them a return of around £12m from the wind-up of MGR Capital. Given that HBOS and Phoenix each own 50% of MGR Capital’s shares this suggests they would each be entitled to half the company’s net assets.

In a written statement, a Phoenix spokesman confirmed the businessmen had received £1.5m in dividends from MGR Capital as well as their original £500,000 investments each. But he said there had been no further funds distributed to the group. “Any other share redemption will be retained by HBOS.”

At the time of the Rover collapse, the Phoenix Four pledged to put any of the assets and funds recovered into a trust to benefit employees.

If the four benefit from their share of the assets left in MGR Capital, it will swell the bounty from their association with MG Rover to £50m, although they dispute this figure. They are also accused of taking more than £40m in pay and pensions from the collapsed carmaker.

In a dossier issued by their public relations advisers the four argued they had been victims of a smear campaign. “The mythical figure of ‘£40m’ in payments to the Phoenix directors is entirely inaccurate and is based on erroneous and mischievous DTI press briefings. It is not supported by published Phoenix Venture Holdings accounts,” it said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Phoenix Four net another £3.5m

Further return for buyers of failed car manufacturer

The Phoenix Four business executives who bought MG Rover from BMW in 2000 have received a further £3.5m in dividends and share payments in the four years since its collapse.

The cash has come from their investment in MGR Capital, a car finance joint venture with a subsidiary of banking group HBOS, now part of Lloyds TSB.

MGR Capital, which bought the Rover cars finance and lease loan book from BMW for £313m in 2001, was wound up last year. The Phoenix Four could also be entitled to a further windfall of £12m from the assets from the wind-up according to company accounts, although their spokesman disputed this figure.

Government inspectors completed a four-year inquiry last week into the collapse of MG Rover and the role of the Phoenix Four: John Towers, Nick Stephenson, John Edwards and Peter Beale. But the report will not be released until a further investigation has been undertaken by the Serious Fraud Office.

When Phoenix Venture Holdings, (PVH) the four men’s master company, and MG Rover’s parent bought Rover Financial Services, it said the acquisition was a significant achievement.

But the interest in MGR Capital was acquired independently of PVH through a company called the Phoenix Partnership. This is owned partly by Edwards and Beale who were both directors of MGR Capital, with the four men each taking £500,000 of preference capital in the business. HBOS owns the balance of the company. The preference shares have provided a dividend of around £100,000 a year for each of the Phoenix Four. Late last year they redeemed the preference shares, netting them a collective windfall of £2m.

Redemption of the preference shares was a precursor to the winding up of MGR Capital. The company was no longer trading because the loan book had been exhausted.

Net assets stood at £23m at the end of 2008. A simple extrapolation suggests the shares held by Edwards and Beale would net them a return of around £12m from the wind-up of MGR Capital. Given that HBOS and Phoenix each own 50% of MGR Capital’s shares this suggests they would each be entitled to half the company’s net assets.

In a written statement, a Phoenix spokesman confirmed the businessmen had received £1.5m in dividends from MGR Capital as well as their original £500,000 investments each. But he said there had been no further funds distributed to the group. “Any other share redemption will be retained by HBOS.”

At the time of the Rover collapse, the Phoenix Four pledged to put any of the assets and funds recovered into a trust to benefit employees.

If the four benefit from their share of the assets left in MGR Capital, it will swell the bounty from their association with MG Rover to £50m, although they dispute this figure. They are also accused of taking more than £40m in pay and pensions from the collapsed carmaker.

In a dossier issued by their public relations advisers the four argued they had been victims of a smear campaign. “The mythical figure of ‘£40m’ in payments to the Phoenix directors is entirely inaccurate and is based on erroneous and mischievous DTI press briefings. It is not supported by published Phoenix Venture Holdings accounts,” it said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


GM reborn after 40 bankruptcy days

‘Business as usual is over at GM,’ said CEO Fritz Henderson

America’s biggest carmaker, General Motors, won a second chance to prove itself as a profitable motor manufacturer today as it emerged from bankruptcy at lightning speed after a remarkably swift, smooth financial restructuring.

After just 40 days under court-supervised protection from its creditors, GM was resurrected as a solvent business shortly after 6.30am when lawyers, completing an all-night paperwork session, signed over its factories, stocks, equipment and intellectual property to a new entity controlled by the US government.

GM’s chief executive, Fritz Henderson, pledged to pay back $50bn (£30.9bn) of public loans well in advance of a deadline of 2015 and promised that the streamlined company would be a nimbler, less bureaucratic and more decisive organisation. GM will focus on four vehicle brands – Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC.

“Business as usual is over at GM,” said Henderson at a press conference in Detroit. “Today, we take the intensity, decisiveness and speed of the past several months and transfer it from the triage of the bankruptcy process to the creation and operation of a new General Motors.”

He continued: “We recognise that we’ve been given a rare second chance at GM, and we are very grateful for that. And we appreciate the fact that we now have the tools to get the job done.”

The US government owns 60.8% of the new GM, while Canada’s government holds 11.7% and a union-controlled pension fund has 17.5%. Creditors of the old company, who were owed $27bn (£16.67), were compensated with a stake of just 10% to the dismay of Wall Street bondholders who fought a short, unsuccessful battle for a larger slice.

President Obama had initially predicted that reforming GM would take 60 to 90 days. But creditors’ objections were decisively thrown out by a New York bankruptcy judge, Robert Gerber, in a resounding win for the administration’s auto restructuring taskforce.

“This is a major victory for the Obama administration over Wall Street,” said Aaron Bragman, a motor industry analyst at IHS Global Insight in Detroit. “The government really put the screws on bondholders and enforced a deal on them that it thought was suitable.”

After swapping loans for equity, the new GM has debt of $48bn (£29.6bn), compared to the $170bn (£105bn) burden when it filed for chapter 11 protection. But the transformation has been painful for thousands of employees, parts suppliers and car dealers.

Once cutbacks are complete in 2011, GM is likely to have just 38,000 blue-collar factory workers in the US, compared to 113,000 three years ago. The number of GM plants will fall from 47 to 31 and, through a clear-out of senior management, GM’s executive team will shrink by 35%.

The firm, which was once the largest corporation in America, is in the process of selling international names including Saab, Vauxhall, Opel and Hummer as part of its downsizing. In Britain, the decision to offload GM’s European operations has cast a cloud of uncertainty over 5,500 jobs at Vauxhall factories in Luton and Ellesmere Port, Cheshire.

Henderson said GM’s emergence from the bankruptcy courts would allow “every employee, including me, to get back to the business of designing, building and selling great cars and trucks”.

He insisted that GM could shake off its reputation for uninspirational designs and slow-moving bureaucracy.

“Einstein’s definition of insane is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results,” said Henderson. “We know we have to change.”

Among GM’s priorities will be the development of environmentally-friendly vehicles such as the electrically powered GM Volt, which is due to be launched by the end of next year. GM executives have even reportedly mulled changing the company’s distinctive blue logo to a green hue, although Henderson said he did not plan to do this.

New initiatives include a joint venture with the website eBay to explore ways of auctioning cars online, and a forum called ‘Ask Fritz’ in which customers will be able to share suggestions with the chief executive.

But financial experts warned that the company faces challenges in winning back the trust of customers and the financial community.

“The legacy costs are gone. The challenge in the future is how to approach a marketplace that has been burned by GM,” said Pete Hastings, a credit analyst at Morgan Keegan.

Along with its rival Chrysler which also recently went through bankruptcy, GM has been hit by the worst slump in US vehicle sales since the second world war. The company has struggled to cope with high petrol prices, a change in tastes towards smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles and fierce competition from Asian rivals. It has lost its title as the world’s leading carmaker to Japan’s Toyota.

A new chairman, former AT&T boss Edward Whitacre, will preside over GM’s board. He told reporters: “For 100 years, General Motors was among the world’s greatest companies. It deserves to be there again and it will be there again.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


GM reborn after 40 bankruptcy days

US government takes majority stake in new company to buy most of carmaker’s assets

General Motors is poised to emerge as a new company later today after only 40 days in bankruptcy.

When GM filed for bankruptcy at the beginning of June, the process had been expected to take as long as three months. But the carmaker is set to re-emerge even faster than rival Chrysler, which came out of bankruptcy on 10 June after 42 days.

GM’s chief executive Fritz Henderson is holding a news conference in Detroit at 9am local time (2pm BST) to announce the completion of the sale of most of the company’s assets to a new concern that is majority-owned by the US government.

He will also outline his plans to make the company profitable again. These include massive cost reductions aimed at streamlining GM’s bureaucratic management structure. The carmaker is cutting a further 4,000 white-collar jobs, including 450 top managers. It employs 88,000 people in the US and 235,000 worldwide.

Once the world’s largest carmaker, the company has been hit by the worst slump in US car sales in 26 years. It will emerge cleansed of debts and troubled contracts that nearly dragged it to collapse and liquidation.

It joined rival Chrysler to ask for $37bn (£22.8bn) of government funding earlier this year. But this did not save both firms from falling into bankruptcy after bondholders balked at having their loans wiped out.

On 1 June, GM officially declared itself bankrupt – the largest bankruptcy filing by a US manufacturing company.

The 101-year-old carmaker sought legal protection – known as Chapter 11 – from its creditors after running up losses of $81bn over four years.

A bankruptcy order went into effect yesterday allowing GM to sell most of its assets to a new company 61%-owned by the US government.

Some of GM’s creditors said the government should have let the carmaker fail. But US bankruptcy judge Robert Gerber wrote in a 7 July ruling that a liquidation would be “staggering” to the public.

The case “raises the spectre of systemic failure throughout the North American auto industry, and grievous damage to all of the communities in which GM operates,” the judge wrote.

The new General Motors will focus on four key brands – Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC. It is in the middle of selling Saturn, Saab, Hummer and Opel, and will discontinue Pontiac by the end of the year.

“It is the smaller, leaner, tougher, better cost-focused GM,” said George Magliano, a car manufacturing analyst with the consulting firm IHS Global Insight. “But they still have to deal with the problems they faced longer-term.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Slump in UK car sales eases off

• Year-on-year fall shrinks to 16% from 28%
• Car scrappage scheme led to 23,000 extra sales in June, SMMT estimates

The slump in UK car sales eased off last month as the government’s car scrappage scheme lured customers back into showrooms, according to new data that gives hope to the beleaguered car industry.

Figures released by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) showed 176,264 vehicles were sold in June, up from 134,858 in May.

This is 15.7% less than a year ago but is the smallest year-on-year fall since July 2008 and a marked improvement on the 28% year-on-year decline seen in the first five months of this year.

June is the first full month in which the government’s “cash for bangers” scheme has been operating, which encouraged people to buy new cars by giving a £2,000 payment for their old vehicle. The SMMT believes the scheme has resulted in about 23,000 extra sales in June.

“We are now beginning to see the positive impact of the scrappage scheme translate into new vehicle registrations,” said Paul Everitt, the SMMT chief executive. “We can already see the industry making steady progress on the long road to recovery.”

Last month, it was reported that 60,000 orders have been placed under the scheme, suggesting it could boost car sales over the next few months.

Darren Winder, head of macro and strategy research at Cazenove, said that today’s figures showed the outlook for new car sales was brighter than at the start of 2009.

“With over 9m vehicles estimated to be more than 10 years old, the scrappage scheme is likely to continue to support new car sales in the second half of 2009,” Winder said.

But Howard Archer, economist at IHS Global Insight, warned that the UK economy might only get a limited boost from the £300m scheme, which runs until February 2010.

“There is a significant danger that increased spending by consumers on vehicles will come at the expense of spending on other big ticket items,” he said.

“The benefit to the UK economy will also depend significantly to what degree the new cars purchased under the scheme are manufactured in the UK.”

The SMMT’s figures showed that registrations to private buyers rose for the first time since November 2007 in June, up by 3.9%. Small cars have enjoyed the biggest rise in demand, with the mini segment of the market growing by 145% compared with a year ago. The Ford Fiesta was the most popular model, with 9,822 sold, followed by sister car the Focus with 9,286, and Vauxhall’s Corsa with 7,893 sales.

Sales of some larger cars fell sharply in June, though. The number of Bentleys registered dropped to 85, from 142 a year ago, while only a single Hummer was registered, compared with 42 in June 2008.

“There are some great deals out there for consumers to take advantage of and the good news is that they are buying smaller and more fuel-efficient cars, which can only be good news for the environment,” said RAC motoring strategist Adrian Tink.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


SFO to investigate MG Rover demise

Business secretary says examination of carmarker’s failure will see if there are grounds for prosecution

The Serious Fraud Office has been called in to investigate the £1.4bn demise of MG Rover, the Birmingham-based carmaker that collapsed in April 2005 with the loss of an estimated 15,000 British jobs.

The business secretary, Lord Mandelson, confirmed today that the SFO would investigate the failure of the business, after the government’s four-year inquiry concluded there could be grounds for a criminal investigation.

Mandelson said: “There has been a comprehensive and thorough investigation into the events which led to the company failing, workers losing their jobs and creditors not getting paid. The SFO must now see if there are grounds for prosecution.” 

Mandelson’s decision means the report compiled by the government’s own inquiry team, which followed an investigation that cost the UK taxpayer £16m, will be kept secret until after the SFO has completed its work.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said that, following legal advice, the Rover report “will not be published at this time in order to ensure any potential prosecution is not prejudiced.  The position will be reviewed following the outcome of the SFO’s considerations.”

News that the process will drag on for months, and possibly years, has infuriated the so-called Phoenix Four, the team of businessmen who ran MG Rover when it failed and have been accused of asset stripping. Mandelson’s decision is also likely to be criticised by political opponents as a cynical attempt to delay publication of the report until after the general election.

The failure of MG Rover was an intense embarrassment to the government as it had backed Phoenix Venture Holdings at the start of the decade when it bought the business, built from another once-great Midlands vehicle manufacturer British Leyland, from BMW. The German car company had racked up losses of more than £2.85bn during its six-year ownership of Rover.

Ministers supported the Phoenix team – Peter Beale, Nick Stephenson, John Edwards and former Rover executive John Towers – against private equity firm Alchemy, which had proposed turning the company into a niche manufacturer of MG sports cars at the Longbridge plant, south-west of Birmingham. Alchemy’s idea would have resulted in substantial job losses.

The Phoenix team snapped up Rover for just £10 in a deal that included a £427m loan from BMW and £350m worth of unsold cars. It later emerged that during their five-year ownership of the business, the Phoenix Four took an estimated £40m out in salaries, fees, pension contributions and other assets.

When Rover got into trouble, the government attempted to help push it into the hands of a potential Chinese rescuer, the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation, but talks collapsed and administrators PricewaterhouseCoopers were called in.

The company’s failure left about 6,000 Rover employees out of work and had repercussions across the motor industry. An estimated 9,000 people who worked for Rover’s suppliers and in its dealer networks also lost their jobs.

After the firm went into administration, the government appointed insolvency law expert Guy Newey QC and forensic accountant Gervase MacGregor, a partner at BDO Stoy Hayward, to lead an inquiry into the collapse. They were expected to report later that year but the investigation lasted four years.

At the weekend, a spokesman for the Phoenix Four said plans to have another investigation were ridiculous, stressing there had never been any suggestion of improper conduct by the directors, a view that was confirmed in a report by the administrators six months after they took over the company.

“Four years on, any suggestion of another investigation is frankly ridiculous and smacks of kicking this issue into the long grass,” said the spokesman.

News that the official government report will not be made public, in case it prejudices the SFO investigation, will anger local MPs and means former employees will have to wait even longer for payouts from the workers’ trust fund.

When news that the report had been passed to Mandelson emerged on 11 June, Birmingham Northfield MP Richard Burden described the long wait as “incredibly frustrating”. “I now hope that the contents of the inquiry will be made available as soon as possible,” he said.

The Phoenix Four have stated in the past that no money pledged to former employees from the MG Rover Trust Fund, raised through the sale of dealerships and other property, will be paid out until the inquiry report has been published.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


New-look GM gets green light from US judge

• Judge rules that creating New GM was only way to guarantee the carmaker’s future
• Creditors’ group fails to block restructuring

The rescue of General Motors has cleared a major hurdle, with a US judge last night approving the sale of its most profitable assets to a new company.

Judge Robert Gerber ruled that creating New GM was the only way to guarantee the carmaker’s future.

“As nobody can seriously dispute, the only alternative to an immediate sale is liquidation – a disastrous result for GM’s creditors, its employees, the suppliers who depend on GM for their own existence, and the communities in which GM operates,” said Gerber. The sale would “prevent the death of the patient on the operating table,” he added.

General Motors was put into bankruptcy protection on 1 June, weighed down by billions of dollars of debt. Under a restructuring plan agreed with the US government, many dealerships and factories will close and the GM workforce will shrink dramatically to create a leaner company.

A group of creditors had attempted to block the fast-track restructuring, claiming their rights were being ignored, but Gerber was not swayed by their argument.

“In the event of a liquidation, creditors now trying to increase their incremental recoveries would get nothing,” he said.

The US government had threatened to cut its funding to GM if the sale was not completed by 10 July.

New GM will include valuable assets such as the Cadillac and Chevrolet brands. Its US manufacturing workforce is to drop to just 38,000 by 2011, from 113,000 in 2006.

General Motors Europe, which includes Vauxhall, is already being sold while a buyer has also been found for its Hummer brand. Unwanted parts of the business will be liquidated. The chief executive, Fritz Henderson, told Gerber last week that winding up Old GM could take three years and cost up to $1.25bn.

The US government will hand the new company a $60bn cash injection in return for its 60% stake, with the rest divided between the United Auto Workers union (17.5%), the Canadian government (12%) and GM bondholders (about 10%).

Gerber’s decision means that a restructured GM could be out of bankruptcy protection by September, although there is still time for opponents to file legal challenges.

Steve Jakubowski, a lawyer representing product-liability claimants, said he would keep fighting the sale because the restructuring plan did not make New GM liable for lawsuits from the victims of car accidents that happened before it went into bankrupcy.

The sale of GM Europe was thrown into confusion last Friday when Beijing Automotive Industry Corporation (BAIC), the Chinese state-owned carmaker, filed a late offer for the group.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


SFO investigation delays Rover report

Four-year £16m inquiry into carmaker’s demise will not be seen until Serious Fraud Squad has investigated ‘Phoenix Four’

The Serious Fraud Office has been called in to investigate the £1.4bn demise of MG Rover, the Birmingham-based carmaker that collapsed in April 2005 with the loss of an estimated 15,000 British jobs.

In a written statement to parliament tomorrow , business secretary Lord Mandelson will announce that the SFO will investigate the failure of the business, after the government’s four-year inquiry concluded there could be grounds for a criminal investigation.

Mandelson’s decision means the report compiled by the government’s own inquiry team, which followed an investigation that cost the UK taxpayer £16m, is likely to be kept secret until after the SFO has completed its work.

News that the process will drag on for months and possibly years, has infuriated the so-called Phoenix Four, the team of businessmen who ran MG Rover when it failed and have been accused of asset-stripping. Mandelson’s decision is also likely to be criticised by political opponents as a cynical attempt to kick the issue “into the long grass” ahead of a general election.

The failure of MG Rover four years ago was an intense embarrassment to the government as it had backed Phoenix Venture Holdings at the start of the decade when it bought the business, built from another once-great Midlands vehicle manufacturer British Leyland, from the then owners BMW. The German car company had racked up losses of more than £2.85bn during its six- year ownership of Rover.

Ministers supported the Phoenix team of Peter Beale, Nick Stephenson, John Edwards and former Rover executive John Towers, over private equity firm Alchemy, which had proposed turning the company into a niche manufacturer of MG sports cars at the Longbridge plant, south-west of Birmingham. Alchemy’s idea would have resulted in substantial job losses.

The Phoenix team snapped up Rover for just £10 in a deal that included a £427m loan from BMW and £350m worth of unsold cars. It later emerged that during their five-year ownership of the business the Phoenix Four took an estimated £40m out in salaries, fees, pension contributions and other assets.

When Rover got into trouble, the government attempted to help push it into the hands of a potential Chinese rescuer, the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation, but talks collapsed and administrators PricewaterhouseCoopers were called in.

The company’s failure left about 6,000 Rover employees out of work and had repercussions across the motor industry. An estimated 9,000 people who worked for Rover’s suppliers and in its dealer networks also lost their jobs.

After the firm went into administration in April 2005, the government appointed insolvency law expert Guy Newey QC and forensic accountant Gervase MacGregor, a partner at BDO Stoy Hayward, to lead an inquiry into the collapse. They were expected to report later that year but the investigation lasted four years.

At the weekend, a spokesman for the Phoenix Four branded as “ridiculous” plans to have another investigation, stressing there has never been any suggestion of improper conduct by the directors, a view that was confirmed in a report by the administrators six months after they took over the company.

“Four years on, any suggestion of another further investigation is frankly ridiculous and smacks of kicking this issue into the long grass,” said the spokesman.

News that the official government report will not be made public, in case it prejudices the SFO investigation, will anger local MPs and means former employees will have to wait even longer for payouts from the workers’ trust fund.

When news that the report had been passed to Lord Mandelson emerged on 11 June, Birmingham MP Richard Burden described the long wait as “incredibly frustrating”, adding: “I now hope that the contents of the inquiry will be made available as soon as possible.”

The Phoenix Four have stated in the past that no money pledged to former employees from the MG Rover Trust Fund, raised through the sale of dealerships and other property, will be paid out until the inquiry report has been published.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


The names of shame

Nigaz is the latest in a long line of branding blunders, following the great Datsun Cedric, Dyck whisky and Krapp toilet paper

Nigaz. How we laughed. What’s in a name? Several billion dollars of brand equity … if you get it right. Check Nike and Google. The first, the Greek goddess of victory, the second from “googol”, a mathematical term for one followed by a hundred zeroes. Brilliant coinages, each.

And if you don’t? International derision and a certain place in business school case studies of provincialism, corporate astigmatism and swivel-eyed folly. For example, in the early years of the Japanese export drive, Australia was a key market. They researched popular men’s names and, circa 1957, the most popular was Cedric. Hence, the Datsun Cedric became a market leader. It could so easily have been Keith or Bruce. Later, Datsun became Nissan because too many of those same Australians remembered the D-word attached to tanks.

The Japanese have maintained a rich tradition in this area. Mazda has recently offered the Bongo Wagon and Subaru a Sambar Dias II Picnic-Car Astonish. In London, you could go and buy a Toyota MR-2, but if you live in Paris you would want to do no such thing as, pronounced the French way, that name sounds like “emmerdeur“, or “shitty”. In Sweden, there is a biscuit called Bums and a lavatory paper sold as Krapp. The old system of Cona coffee percolators had some difficulty establishing itself in Portugal since that word is the equivalent of the last English four letters retaining an ability to shock.

Right now, in Andalucia, they are selling a local whisky called “Dyck”. Anglophone larrikins enjoy entering bars and asking very loudly for “a big dick”. In the 90s, Ford, apparently innocent of Freudian insights, had a sports coupe called a “Probe“. No data exists to determine to what extent brand values were affected when hopeful Lotharios were met with an explosion of ridicule when they muttered “would you like to come outside and see my Probe?” The decade before, Ford’s key products – Escort and Fiesta – shared their names with girly magazines of the day.

Huge consultancies now exist to avoid this sort of nomenclatural calamity: with markets becoming ever more globalised, “Norwich Union” does not suggest imperial-era probity, only irrelevant obscurity. So, it becomes Aviva. An association with the old lingua franca means the suggestion of Latin always plays well, so Guinness (which evokes ferrety old men in damp West Cork pubs) becomes Diageo, which sounds like a medicine. But then, they always did say it was good for you.

This article was amended 30 June 2009 at 09:20 to take in a correction pointed out by a user (see below).

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds