RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Blogposts’

Fake Miliband duo call it quits on Twitter

A pair of recent university graduates were behind the fake Twitter account of foreign secretary David Miliband and say it highlights the importance of verification on the internet

The world now has one less Twitter account satirising a politician. After duping the international press, two recent university graduates have decided to stop updating the fake account of British foreign secretary David Miliband.

Several newspapers, including The Guardian, incorrectly reported that David Miliband posted a heartfelt tribute to Michael Jackson on his Twitter account following the pop star’s death. The tribute was not posted by Miliband but rather by 23-year-old Rory Crew and 22-year-old Knud Noelle.

They created the account in January to bring political comedy to Twitter, Crew said. They wanted to pick someone well known but realised thought Gordon Brown was too obvious. “No one would have believed it,” he said.

They respect Miliband but they also believed that “he would be the perfect politician to parody,” Crew said.

They settled on him because while Miliband is frequently quoted in the press there is little if any reporting on his personal life or thoughts. No one would have the information to contradict their satirical snippets on Twitter.

They checked the FCO website regularly so that they could keep up with his schedule, and if they were lacking in inspriration, they checked his occasional blog posts for ideas.

While some of the tweets were clearly ridiculous and his constituency paper, the Shields Gazette, described them as “increasingly bizarre”, some FCO staff thought it might be an inside job because of the accuracy of the diary items.

After tricking media from “China to Washington”, they have decided to stop posting to the account because they didn’t want to bring themselves or Miliband into disrepute and “there was no where to go with this short of causing an actual diplomatic incident,” Crew said.

Their goal wasn’t to trick the media. “I’m not happy about duping the media, but they learned something,” he said. All journalists had to do to realise the account was fake was to read one or two of previous updates, such as this tweet: “The proleteriat make my head hurt!.” It’s also doubtful that David Miliband would ever refer to Chancellor Secretary Alistair Darling as “Eyebrows”.

“It does highlight the importance of the verification of sources, which is clearly becoming more difficult in the web 2.0 era,” the pair wrote in an email to the Guardian.

Noelle has just finished his journalism degree from City University, and Crew plans to start a journalism course. But the experience left Crew “a little bit disappointed” with journalism but said it was the result of newspapers cutting sub editors and lacking in fact checking.

They hope to make a living from writing, and one positive result from the hoax is that they now have the confidence to do it.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Books cooked rare

Unusual cookery books can be a recipe for mild obsession. WoMer and Taste of London festival fringe tweeter Catherine Phipps, aka Catlily, talks shop with the experts. What’s your greatest pleasure when it comes to cookery books and food writing?

I have two obsessions in life: books and food. Put the two together and I’m in heaven (and here amongst fellow Word of Mouthers I know I’m not alone!). I trawl cookery books for inspiration and love being carried off to far-flung times and places. One minute I’m barefoot in the rainforest, transported by the scent of exotic spices, the next I’m immersed in the nineteenth century when suet was king and the poor feasted on oysters.

I devote hours to seeking out undiscovered titles both old and new, but I am selective. I don’t want something generic or an untested slebchef glossy, and I care about the quality of the writing. I get almost as much pleasure from Fergus Henderson’s gentle wit as I do from his recipes; I reach more often for Jane Grigson than Elizabeth David, because I find in the former a motherly instructor who always tells you why, and in the latter a hectoring and prescriptive personality.

Seeking the books out is all part of the fun and is made all the better if you find a bookseller who knows their stuff, loves the subject matter and is prepared to impart their enthusiasm to their customers. I found this singular combination in two people last weekend at Taste of London. Being the cookery book junkie that I am it was no great trauma to drag myself away from the tasting frenzy to spend an hour or so talking about the business of book selling with Jonathan Tootell, a rare and secondhand cookery book specialist, and the manager of the cookery book department at Foyles, Veronica Leek.

I was interested to know what people buy and how that influences their stock. As this was Taste, the books Jonathan had brought along were quite chef-centric – Richard Olney’s Simple French Food and Anthony Blake’s Great Chefs of France are unsurprisingly sought after, but it was a delight to hear that one of my own personal favourites, Lindsey Bareham, is popular, particularly for her Big Red Book of Tomatoes. More off the wall are the crime/food books of Nicholas Freeling, who apparently inspired Bourdain’s “Kitchen Confidential”. Having read the latter, I’m not altogether sure whether this is a good thing.

It seems that many of Jonathan’s less cheffy customers have similar tastes to mine – they want to browse quirky, amusing titles as well as find that elusive, out of print title. I’ll buy a book purely on the strength of the title, such as Elizabeth Robins Pennell’s A Guide for the Greedy by a Greedy Woman, a collection of writings from the late 19th century.

I was recently entranced by the ferocious sounding Beatrice Clay (House Matron and Home Ec lecturer, Glossop) who divides her foods into “nitrogenous” and “non nitrogenous”, has “wet” and “dry” cooking methods for meat, and who under the beverage section gives this exhortation: “My advice to you about alcohol is: Leave it alone. O God, that men should put an enemy into their mouths To steal away their brains.” This type of book is bedtime reading and doesn’t often make it into the kitchen, but many others I possess are food splattered.

I asked Jonathan about this, and he said that splatterings will devalue a book but annotations won’t. I was pleased about this, as one of the delights of looking in old books is to find the handwritten amendments, complaints (“Beware! Doesn’t work!”), and recipes cut out from other sources.

One way I differ from some of Jonathan’s clients is that I care more about the words in the book than the book itself – some collectors objectify the books. His strangest example of this came when he was invited to someone’s house to value their collection – 2000 pristine, untouched books on cookery and a kitchen which had never been used beyond making the odd cup of tea.

Jonathan has a concession at Foyles, which means that they still have a stock of secondhand books alongside the new – a system popular with many independents (such as the wonderful Books For Cooks) and one I heartily agree with. I tend to avoid the major chains unless I want something very new and mainstream which is being discounted, but I’m thinking of revisiting Foyles in particular, as they assure me that they try to keep everything that’s in print, and see much value in holding titles which fill out their collection even if they don’t expect to sell more than the occasional copy (the example they gave me was Constance Spry; the value of having her books on the shelves is that discerning and knowledgeable customers expect to see them).

I found the whole buying policy intriguing, because the booksellers have to be clued in enough to spot trends (the reasons for an emerging trend are often obvious, but sometime they come out of nowhere, such as the recent craze for canapés) and listen to their customers enough to know what will sell. This means taking risks at times. Veronica Leek told me was that she sometimes takes books on spec from self-published authors, because her instinct tells her it will sell. These sometimes attract publishing deals, so would-be food writers, take heart!

As I said above, knowing the WoM crowd I’m sure I’m not alone in my obsessions. What is your greatest pleasure when it comes to cookery books and food writing? And where do you go to feed your habit? Do the virtual shelves of the internet and the pile ‘em high displays on the high street fulfil your needs, or are you frustrated by the what’s on offer? Perhaps you regularly haunt a certain second hand bookshop – if you can bear to reveal your sources, then please tell us.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Reviewing Katine: governance

To mark the midway point of the Katine project, and ahead of mid-point reviews to be conducted by our independent evaluator and Amref, this week Madeleine Bunting examines progress in each of the project’s five components. In her final review she looks at governance.

Read Madeleine’s reviews of health, education, water and sanitation and livelihoods

Empowerment has been the strand of the project that us journalists have found the hardest to understand. What exactly is empowerment, and how is it going to be measured or evaluated? I’ve listened to Joshua Kyallo, Amref Uganda’s director, explain how villagers can be empowered to demand better services from the government at district level. But there are plenty of questions in my mind as to how effective this will be in improving the operation of state services in Katine.

The district budgets for health and education, for roads and water are desperately inadequate. It is not just the lack of demand for services that causes the state to be so ineffectual at village level here. I find the “rights-based” approach, based on developing in villagers a sense of entitlement to basic health and education, hard to understand. Katine may put more pressure on the district, but there are multiple problems at every level of Ugandan government; often the district can do very little.

There are other aspects of empowerment that also need to be questioned. I talked to a few Katine residents – not those recruited as volunteers by Amref – and the way they spoke seemed to indicate that Amref was well regarded, but there was no great enthusiasm. I felt that in some places there was a gentle disappointment settling in. Several of the Amref staff spoke of how they had struggled with huge expectations of the project from Katine villagers. Is that the Guardian’s fault, I asked, with its headlines promising “transformation”? Perhaps partly, they agreed.

I wondered how actively Amref has managed expectations and how widely it had communicated with villagers across this very scattered sub-county about what the project was going to do and what it was not going to do. Joseph Malinga’s story about the confusions in a particularly remote corner of the sub-county, Merok, seemed to point to an important breakdown in communications. How was it that this kind of misunderstanding was not corrected by Amref earlier?

There is a sense that Amref decided what it wanted to do in Katine and the extent to which local people – beyond the local government officials – have been involved in that strategy is unclear. There is clearly a tension here between giving people what is known to be good for them – hygiene training – or giving them what they keep asking for – cows. The only way to square this circle is constant communication and explanation and from the outside it is hard to see how well Amref is doing that.

The concern is that given the considerable demands the Guardian makes on Amref – for information and visits – the priority has been to communicate with London rather than the remote hamlets of Katine.

What we need to know

How well are local people being involved in the project?
How much say have they had in shaping its priorities?
Is Amref’s relationship with the Guardian distorting the project?
How does empowerment in the long run help deliver better services?

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds