RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Botswana’

Miss United States Alexandria Mills Wins Miss World Pageant

Go Team USA! Dark horse Miss United States Of America Alexandria Mills walked away with the prized tiara at the 60th annual Miss World Pageant in the Chinese city Sanya on Saturday. The 18-year-old aspiring teacher from Kentucky wore a ravishing white gown as she beat out 114 contestants from across the Globe for the [...]

Joe Jonas vows to devote himself to charity work

American singer Joe Jonas has promised to devote himself to charity work following a life-changing humanitarian trip to Africa. The Jonas Brothers singer went to Botswana and he admitted that he was humbled by the experience. “I brought some of my best friends with me to be a part of this incredible experience. We were [...]

Richard Burton told Elizabeth Taylor: I’ll kill myself if you leave me

Elizabeth Taylor has made public a series of never-before-seen love letters she received from Richard Burton which gives new insight into their passionate but turbulent romance.
In the letters, Burton bared his soul, and even suggested committing suicide if she leaves him, saying he is infatuated and cannot live without her, reports The Telegraph.
“If you leave [...]

Know how Prince Harry and Prince William will Spend their Summer holidays

In just a couple of weeks, the handsome princes, Harry and William, will be out for their first overseas tour together.
The two young princes are bound to South Africa. Their tour starts from the 14th of June. However, the trip would only last for 5 days. On the 19th of June, the brothers will go [...]

While stocks last

Some ivory sales are a good idea. This one isn’t

IN 1989 the signatories to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) agreed to ban the ivory trade, and banned it has remained. Except, that is, for when CITES chooses to allow it—as it has done now and then since 1997, when specific countries have some well-sourced ivory to get rid of. Most recently, in 2008, South Africa, Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe were allowed to make such sales to China and Japan. Now, as the triennial CITES meeting gets under way in Doha, both Tanzania and Zambia say they want to do something similar.

Those in favour of such sales (most notably, the countries which seek to make them) say they allow countries to benefit from having elephants, and help to finance elephant conservation and protection. Those against them (some conservation charities and some academics in the field) argue that any sale of ivory will lead to an increase in poaching by stimulating demand, and that little of the money raised actually goes to elephants. …

Many pregnant African women avoid HIV screening

A large number of pregnant women in Uganda, Africa deliberately avoid being tested for HIV, increasing the risk of mother-to-child transmission, says a study.
In a new paper, researchers discussed how mother-to-child transmission of HIV can be easily and cost-effectively prevented using a short course of antiretroviral therapy.
However, this is effective only if the mother [...]

Outstripped

Africa needs to become much more competitive, if the continent is to prosper

Sub-Saharan Africa is tending to fall behind other regions in terms of competitiveness. Human capital deficiencies—whether in terms of education or health—infrastructure and high crime levels tend to be deterrents as far as investors are concerned.

Sub-Saharan economies have become more competitive in the past year, according to the World Economic Forum (WEF)’s Global Competitiveness Report, published on September 8th. Adjusted for the fact that there is one less country ranked in the 2009/2010 report, 13 of the 26 Sub-Saharan economies rated have improved their standing, while three are unchanged from last year and ten have slipped back. The greatest improvement by far is registered by Uganda, up 20 places at 108th (out of 133 overall), while Lesotho jumps 16 places and Tanzania 13. The worst African performers over the past 12 months have been Mali, down 13 places, Ghana (-12) and Botswana (-10). …

Jaime Pozuelo-Monfort: Diamonds Are Not Forever

Botswana is an example of how to wisely administer a natural resource endowment.

‘Are we here for your amusement?’

Our increasing demand for adventure is pushing back the frontiers of tourism, but is it also posing a threat to tribal people? John Vidal investigates

When the Jarawa tribe of hunter-gatherers began to emerge in ones and twos from the dense rainforests of the Andaman islands in 1997, it seemed that these mysterious, handsome people only wanted to take a brief look at the modern world and would soon return to the trees.

But in the months that followed, shy Jarawa youths slowly gained in confidence and could be found hanging out on the side of a road recently built through their land. Then they started to stop cars and buses going by, and to beg for food. They even began to board ferries to travel between the islands.

No one knows why these people – one of the original tribes of the Andaman and Nicobar islands, a remote archipelago in the Indian Ocean – decided to leave the forest at that time. Twelve years on they have become a tourist attraction. Local companies take people to gawp at and photograph them as if they are animals in a zoo. Some throw sweets and biscuits to them, or offer them lifts and money.

The majority of the Jarawa, thought to number about 250 people, remain deep in the forests, but some have learned bits of Hindi and regularly visit the port, the hospital or market place, says Sophie Grig, a researcher at human rights organisation Survival International who has visited the Andamans several times. One or two Jarawa children have reportedly gone to a school and asked for education.

Integration has been partial and more or less at the Jarawa’s own pace and volition. But now comes a threat that some anthropologists say could lead to the extinction of a tribe that has lived in isolation for millennia.

Barefoot India, a major Indian travel company, has just won a high court case that will allow it to build an eco-resort at Collipur, close to the designated Jarawa reserve. Other hotels are expected to follow.

Barefoot, which already has an Andamans resort on Havelock Island, plans to bring in thousands of tourists a year from Europe to scuba dive and to explore the remote islands now becoming popular as one of Asia’s least visited beach destinations.

But Survival fears that the increased contact with tourists will inevitably expose the tribe fully to diseases and cultures that they will never be able to cope with. “Evidence from around the world is that isolated tribal peoples have little or no immunity against diseases like flu and measles, and it is certain that the more contact there is between the tribe and tourists that diseases will devastate them,” says Grig. “It’s not unusual for 50% or more of a population to die soon after contact. One epidemic can lead to severe depression, alcohol abuse, dependency and even suicide.

“It’s incredibly dangerous. Why does Barefoot have to go there? There are plenty of other places.”

Grig continues: “The biggest concern is disease. The Jarawa are incredibly vulnerable. Then there’s alcohol. People in this situation are vulnerable to addiction and dependency.”

A spokesman for Barefoot says: “Barefoot would not countenance any exploitation of Jarawa for tourism purposes from any of its guests, and most certainly will not attempt to do so itself. The Jarawa have no access to the resort’s land, which is more than three kilometres away. [Far from threatening the tribe] Barefoot has had an extremely positive impact on the tribal interplay with the villagers in this area.”

There are perhaps 100 indigenous communities around the world that have chosen to live in complete isolation, but the frontiers of tourism are being pushed ever forward by cheap flights and an appetite for extreme ethno-tourism fuelled by the natural instinct of man to be curious about other people – and by shows such as Bruce Parry’s documentary series Tribe.

The Jarawa are peculiarly at risk because they live so close to a holiday resort, but dozens of other extremely remote groups are also in danger. In the West Papua province of Indonesia, US expatriate Kelly Woolford of Papua Adventures offers – for $7,000-$10,000 – to take tourists and camera crews deep into the forests of the Mamberamo and Baliem valleys, where he says they are quite likely to meet “stone age” tribes.

Papua Adventures does not guarantee “encounters”, but its “first contact” trek is advertised as a “full-on exploration” in areas where previously contact-free tribes are known to live.

Groups regularly stumble across tribespeople who appear to threaten them with bows and arrows, but who then disappear. Anthropologists and others who have seen photographs have accused Woolford of setting up these encounters, but he insists that the meetings are all by chance.

“Tourism can be a useful source of income, but most people would say it’s pretty bad news for the local people,” says anthropologist David Turton.

Turton has spent 40 years among the semi-nomadic Mursi in the Omo valley in southern Ethiopia, where some women have had their lower lip pierced and stretched so that a clay plate can be inserted. With the prospect of a giant dam flooding much of their lands, the tribe has enough problems, but it has been exploited by tourism now for 20 years.

Tour companies have presented the Mursi as the most primitive and wild people and the Mursi are fully aware they are being singled out as savages. The tourists arrive in four-wheel drive vehicles and the Mursi gather around them, asking for money in return for being photographed.

Turton has asked the Mursi what they think of these people, who only seem to want their photographs. He recorded this conversation in 1991:

Bio-iton-giga: “Why do they do it? Do they want us to become their children, or what? What do they want the photographs for?”

Turton: “They come because they see you as different and strange people. They go back home and tell their friends that they’ve been on a long trip, to Mursiland. They say, ‘Look, here are the people we saw.’ They do it for entertainment.”

Komor-a-kora: “We said to each other, ‘Are we here just for their amusement?’ ”

“They conclude that white people are thieves. The relationship is similar to prostitution,” says Turton. “The Mursi know they are looked down on. But to them the encounter is a commercial transaction. They are short of everything and cash is important.”

Tourism has always been culturally destructive and exploitative. Hundreds of people once lived in hardship but security on St Kilda, 60 miles off the west coast of mainland Scotland, but the community collapsed after first missionaries and then tourist boats arrived in the 1920s. Within a few years of the first tourists, the community had disintegrated and those remaining on the island had to be evacuated.

Equally, the Himba in Namibia survived everything that a hostile arid environment could throw at them for centuries until they became a tourist attraction in the 1970s. Their communities were overrun and many Himba are now beggars and alcoholics.

These days, tribes are regularly diminished in the name of economic advancement. The refugee Burmese Kayan women in Thailand, who wear brass coils round their necks, each year attract thousands of tourists, who pay to visit them in their camps. Their communities are disintegrating as alcoholic dependency grows.

Governments also act inhumanely to encourage tourism. The Botswana government is putting out to tender for safari companies to build lodges with bore holes in the central Kalahari game reserve at the same time that the Bushmen – who have lived there for millennia – are forbidden to even use the existing ones. One safari lodge will have a water hole less than a mile from the Bushmen, who will be made to walk hundreds of miles to collect water.

The worst destruction of indigenous groups is often invisible, done by governments and the tourism industry exploiting tribal groups for their land. “Indigenous peoples are often removed from their ancestral lands to make way for tourist developments or to create national parks where animals take precedence over people,” says Tricia Barnett, director of Tourism Concern.

The watchdog group is to publish a major report on the human rights abuses of tourism in September. “Tourism is violating left, right and centre all manner of the articles contained in the UN human rights declaration – land rights, dignity, respect, the right to privacy, cultural exploitation,” says Barnett.

But above all, land everywhere is being claimed at the expense of indigenous people for the construction of hotels and golf courses, and for the creation of national parks and reserves.

“The onward march of tourism involves the arbitrary removal of people from their lands,” says Barnett. “Tourists are becoming often unwitting collaborators in the exploitation of others. It is a competitive, resource-hungry industry, by its nature exploitative. International hotel chains and operators jostle to expand and out-price each other, and impoverished governments compete to attract business by offering cheap land and tax free investment. Indigenous groups are often the most vulnerable.”

“Tourism is land hungry. It depends on unspoilt landscapes. Time and again the indigenous peoples have their land grabbed. They just don’t come into the equation,” says Rachel Noble of Tourism Concern.

But it is possible to get ethno-tourism right in an ethically sensitive way. Jonny Bealby, who runs Wild Frontiers, which has been taking small groups of people to stay days at a time in remote places such as the Hindu Kush in Pakistan, says many eco-tourism businesses are starting up.

“These are joint ventures with indigenous communities, like the Achuar [on the Peru/Ecuador border]. In the western Amazon, there are several eco-lodges where usually an agency sets up a partnership with a tribe. The company and the tribe each have a 50% stake. On the whole, they seem to be perfectly respectful of each other. The communities do it on their own terms. The ventures are on a manageable scale. It’s fundamentally a meeting of equals. It comes down to scale and who is in control,” says Bealby. “If [ethno-tourism] is done right it can benefit everyone.”

Successful ventures, such as with the Akha hill tribe in Thailand, Aboriginal cultural tours in Australia, the Garifuna tourism group in Honduras and the Il Ngwesi Lodge in Kenya, which is 100% owned by local Maasai, are invariably grassroots-led and community-based.

“Tribal groups often feel that some tourists exploit them. It happens when they are being observed as if in a goldfish bowl. They do not like it when tourists stay in a swanky hotel and drive in and do not talk to them, then get in their Jeeps and go back,” says Bealby

“That kind of thing happens a lot. But when it’s small groups and the money goes direct to local people, then the benefits flow both ways.”

• For more information on the Jarawa go to survival-international.org/jarawa.

In it together
Leading lights of ethno-tourism

Il Ngwesi Lodge Kenya
Perched on the edge of the Mukogodo escarpment, this is an award-winning, upmarket eco-ranch with timber floors flowing around tree trunks and an infinity pool. Guests can shower outside overlooking a waterhole, go on game drives, camel safaris and guided bush walks. The lodge is owned and run by the Il Ngwesi (which means “people of the wildlife”) Maasai tribe of Laikipiak, who have lived on this land for centuries.

• ilngwesi.com.

El Descanso Costa Rica
El Descanso, in the Río Grande de Térraba river basin, is run by the Asodint indigenous organisation. Traditionally-designed cabins are set in tranquil surroundings and traditional food is on offer. Guests can visit ancient petroglyphs, the Catarata and Térraba rivers and other indigenous communities, learn about medicinal plants, play traditional games and buy local handicrafts. Profits are reinvested into the community.

• nacientespalmichal.com and actuarcostarica.com.

Garifuna Tourism Group Honduras
Located along the peaceful, undeveloped white sandy beaches on the north coast of Honduras on the Caribbean, the Garifuna communities offer grass roots tourism based on cultural exchange and interaction. Guests share in the vibrant local dance, food and music cultures, and learn about Garifuna’s traditional fishing culture. The central tourism group ensures that communities are never over-saturated with tourists, so visitors feel like invited guests. The enterprise is owned by the Garifuna people.

• 00504 9277513 and +4480121, geo.ya.com/ENKEL.

Akha Hill Tribe, Chiang Rai Thailand
In mountainous northern Thailand, visitors stay in bamboo or mud bungalows overlooking a valley surrounded by tea plantations, rice fields, waterfalls and jungle. There is an open-air restaurant, a herbal sauna, and jungle treks with expert guides, including fishing, elephant rides, an overnight stay in a banana leaf house, and visits to other hill tribes. All profits go to the Akha Hill Tribe community and its education system.

• 0066 0899975505, akhahill.com.

Aboriginal Cultural Tours Australia
Aboriginal Cultural Tours take you to rarely seen areas of Adjahdura Land on the Yorke Peninsula of South Australia, walking with descendants of the original owners of the land, living with, talking with, and experiencing first-hand their rich culture. Guests visit Aboriginal communities, explore ancient cultural landscapes and mythological land formations and experience cultural ceremonies. Aboriginal Cultural Tours is owned and operated by indigenous people.

• diversetravel.com.au and aboriginalaustraliatravel.com.

These projects are all listed in Tourism Concern’s Ethical Travel Guide, available to buy at tourismconcern.org.uk, 020-7133 3800.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


De Beers profits lose their gleam

People sorting diamonds in Botswana

Profits at De Beers, the world’s biggest diamond producer, have slumped in the "most difficult" economic environment in decades.

In the first six months of 2009, it made a profit of $3m (£1.8m), down from $316m a year earlier.

Diamonds may – as the song goes – be forever, but they have proved to be as vulnerable to the recession as other, less enduring, consumer goods.

Demand is weak in the US, but many in China and India are still buying gems.

Production cut

As consumers have conserved their cash for more mundane expenditures, De Beers has cut its production.

In the first six months of this year, production was 73% lower than last year at 6.6 million carats – the weight of a diamond is expressed in carats, with one carat equivalent to 0.2 grams.

De Beers will produce roughly half the amount of carats in 2009 that it did in 2008.

Mines in South Africa, Canada, Botswana and Namibia have all taken production holidays as demand fell.

This has helped the company reduce inventories of rough diamonds in cutting centres by 30%. It has also shrunk its global workforce by 23%.

This May 6, 2009 file photo shows a Sotheby"s employee displaying an aquamarine and diamond necklace, by Cartier, 1912, during an auction press preview at Sotheby"s in Geneva, Switzerland.

A future sparkle

While its profit statement may make gloomy reading, De Beers says it has reason for optimism. The rate of decline has slowed so the second half should be better, it said.

Diamond sales, it points out, typically do well after recessions. It pointed to "significant price growth seen in almost every recovery period dating back to the 1970s".

While diamond prices have fallen, there have been no major diamond discoveries in more than a decade, a fact which should support prices.

"We have had to make our prices fairly competitive to win the sales"

Joe Boll, JP Diamonds

"With worldwide reserves at an all-time low, diamonds will become more scarce," it said. "As demand grows in emerging markets, it is likely that sales will outpace forecast diamond supply for many years to come."

Hidden gems

But, as things stand, there is "still poor demand for diamond jewellery in major markets," wrote Des Kilalea, an industry analyst at RBC Capital Markets, in a research note earlier this week.

"Diamond jewellery sales in all markets but China and the Middle East remain under pressure. This trend is highlighted by poor department store revenues in the US (where 45% of all diamond jewellery is sold) with June’s sales down 10%, according to government figures, " he wrote.

For those with money to spare, now may be the time to get a bargain on the High Street.

People are still buying diamonds, said Joe Boll, owner of the UK’s JP Diamonds, but they are looking for a good deal.

"People are still buying, certainly engagement rings and eternity rings. People are buying a little more carefully, and looking to get a reasonable price," he said.

"Generally, we are probably 20% cheaper this year than last year. We have had to make our prices fairly competitive to win the sales. It has worked, our volumes are up, we have taken a little hit in margin."</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Kim Kardashian almost got stranded in South Africa after misplacing passport

Kim Kardashian almost got stranded in South Africa after she misplaced her passport.
She is grateful to her NFL player beau Reggie Bush who was there to save the day.
“They wouldn”t let me out of customs line,” People magazine quoted her as telling about the ordeal after flying from Botswana to Johannesburg, South Africa. [...]

Kim Kardashian Lost Passport In Africa

INFphoto.com
Kim Kardashian was nearly stranded in the Motherland after she misplaced her passport during a flight between from Botswana and Johannesburg, South Africa on Wednesday.

The buxom brunette was detained at customs when she couldn’t produce the essential document upon her arrival in the South African capital.
“I left my passport on the plane!” she explains.
“They [...]

Send in the accountants

Many of Africa’s leaders will have been distressed to hear Obama’s message on aid conditions

Africa’s leaders have become accustomed to a protective stance of victimhood. They only need to say “neo-colonial” for world leaders to back off from criticism. And moats have made the problem worse: imagine the retort to a British politician complaining about African governance. Obama’s arrival in Africa was preceded by his spectacular apology to the Muslim world, so many African leaders must have been hoping for more of the absolving balm of western guilt. They did not get it. Instead, Obama delivered three unwelcome messages.

The most explosive was that Africa’s core problem is its own misgovernance: Africa’s persistent poverty has been largely self-inflicted. Obama is the first western leader to have the political space to deliver this tough but necessary message. He does not need a photo-op with smiling Africans to signal to voters back home that he is a compassionate sort of guy. Nor does he risk being denounced. His protection is in part that it is not possible to imagine Obama in a pith helmet; but beyond that, nobody can seriously question Obama’s sincere concern to help his father’s continent. His statement cannot be interpreted as being the preliminaries to neglect.

Second, the solution to misgovernance will come from within Africa: the key struggle is internal. By choosing to visit Ghana – which recently hosted an honest election, with the governing party narrowly losing – Obama flagged up that leadership depends critically on the integrity of the political process.

Obama has made a clarion call for change, but more importantly, he is the change. Africans see Obama as a fellow African, but unlike most of Africa’s own leaders he personifies the leadership values that he preaches. Poor leadership is not intrinsic to African leadership; it is intrinsic only to the people who have jostled their way into presidencies.

Why has the selection of African leadership been so disastrous? The problem lies not with Africans but with the structure of the polities in which they live. Around the world the chance of a stolen election soars if the society is poor, small, and resource-rich. Even then it is not inevitable: Botswana started with just these features yet it is a functioning democracy. But such countries need strong checks and balances such as a free press and what political scientists call “veto points” – independent bases of power that can block presidential decisions. The democratisation that swept across Africa after the fall of the Soviet Union in most cases amounted to little more than elections.

Which takes us to Obama’s final message: America will help, where it can, to tilt the balance towards brave people struggling for change. American money will be conditional upon decent governance. Where public money can be looted, the political class – no matter what its original composition – will end up peopled by crooks. In Africa aid is such a major component of public money that the scope for capture matters enormously.

To date America and Europe have chosen different mechanisms for aid: Europe has favoured budget support, in which the recipient government decides how the money is spent; America has preferred project aid, where the money is tied to a specific expenditure. In badly governed countries the effect has been the same: the money has been captured by politicians who are the core of the problem. Project aid only gives the illusion of integrity: governments get donors to finance the projects they would have done anyway, and this releases their own money for the presidential wish list. It is the wish list that project aid is really paying for.

The Obama principle provides the basis for a new, common approach. Where governance is satisfactory, as in Ghana, budget support is the only sensible basis for aid. Europe has it right: why should US politicians try to dictate to the Ghanaian government how to spend aid when Ghanaians are able to hold their government to account? At the other end of the governance spectrum neither budget support nor project aid can tackle the problem.

We can learn from Paddy Ashdown‘s experience in Bosnia. He concluded that what he had needed were not doctors without borders, but accountants without borders. Where governance is inadequate, aid should only come with an army of accountants able to ensure that it is not captured. The missing piece of international architecture is an independent assessment of the integrity of budget systems. Where a budget system was certified as satisfactory, Europe and America could safely converge on budget support. Where it was found unsatisfactory, aid would be conditional upon accountants. Governments would know that to get foreign accountants off their backs they need to build systems that withstand scrutiny. The rationale for cleaning up budgets is not that it would safeguard our money, but that it would clean up politics, and build on the distress that Obama’s speech will have caused Africa’s crooked politicians.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Send in the accountants

Many of Africa’s leaders will have been distressed to hear Obama’s message on aid conditions

Africa’s leaders have become accustomed to a protective stance of victimhood. They only need to say “neo-colonial” for world leaders to back off from criticism. And moats have made the problem worse: imagine the retort to a British politician complaining about African governance. Obama’s arrival in Africa was preceded by his spectacular apology to the Muslim world, so many African leaders must have been hoping for more of the absolving balm of western guilt. They did not get it. Instead, Obama delivered three unwelcome messages.

The most explosive was that Africa’s core problem is its own misgovernance: Africa’s persistent poverty has been largely self-inflicted. Obama is the first western leader to have the political space to deliver this tough but necessary message. He does not need a photo-op with smiling Africans to signal to voters back home that he is a compassionate sort of guy. Nor does he risk being denounced. His protection is in part that it is not possible to imagine Obama in a pith helmet; but beyond that, nobody can seriously question Obama’s sincere concern to help his father’s continent. His statement cannot be interpreted as being the preliminaries to neglect.

Second, the solution to misgovernance will come from within Africa: the key struggle is internal. By choosing to visit Ghana – which recently hosted an honest election, with the governing party narrowly losing – Obama flagged up that leadership depends critically on the integrity of the political process.

Obama has made a clarion call for change, but more importantly, he is the change. Africans see Obama as a fellow African, but unlike most of Africa’s own leaders he personifies the leadership values that he preaches. Poor leadership is not intrinsic to African leadership; it is intrinsic only to the people who have jostled their way into presidencies.

Why has the selection of African leadership been so disastrous? The problem lies not with Africans but with the structure of the polities in which they live. Around the world the chance of a stolen election soars if the society is poor, small, and resource-rich. Even then it is not inevitable: Botswana started with just these features yet it is a functioning democracy. But such countries need strong checks and balances such as a free press and what political scientists call “veto points” – independent bases of power that can block presidential decisions. The democratisation that swept across Africa after the fall of the Soviet Union in most cases amounted to little more than elections.

Which takes us to Obama’s final message: America will help, where it can, to tilt the balance towards brave people struggling for change. American money will be conditional upon decent governance. Where public money can be looted, the political class – no matter what its original composition – will end up peopled by crooks. In Africa aid is such a major component of public money that the scope for capture matters enormously.

To date America and Europe have chosen different mechanisms for aid: Europe has favoured budget support, in which the recipient government decides how the money is spent; America has preferred project aid, where the money is tied to a specific expenditure. In badly governed countries the effect has been the same: the money has been captured by politicians who are the core of the problem. Project aid only gives the illusion of integrity: governments get donors to finance the projects they would have done anyway, and this releases their own money for the presidential wish list. It is the wish list that project aid is really paying for.

The Obama principle provides the basis for a new, common approach. Where governance is satisfactory, as in Ghana, budget support is the only sensible basis for aid. Europe has it right: why should US politicians try to dictate to the Ghanaian government how to spend aid when Ghanaians are able to hold their government to account? At the other end of the governance spectrum neither budget support nor project aid can tackle the problem.

We can learn from Paddy Ashdown‘s experience in Bosnia. He concluded that what he had needed were not doctors without borders, but accountants without borders. Where governance is inadequate, aid should only come with an army of accountants able to ensure that it is not captured. The missing piece of international architecture is an independent assessment of the integrity of budget systems. Where a budget system was certified as satisfactory, Europe and America could safely converge on budget support. Where it was found unsatisfactory, aid would be conditional upon accountants. Governments would know that to get foreign accountants off their backs they need to build systems that withstand scrutiny. The rationale for cleaning up budgets is not that it would safeguard our money, but that it would clean up politics, and build on the distress that Obama’s speech will have caused Africa’s crooked politicians.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds