RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Brendan Barber’

UK GDP falls faster than expected

• GDP down 0.8% in threee months to June
• City had expected a 0.3% decline, with some expecting growth

The chancellor’s forecasts for economic growth were blown out of the water official figures revealed Britain’s economy contracted by a record 5.6% over the last year as output fell for a fifth straight quarter.

Dashing hopes that the steepest decline in growth since the 1930s might be nearing an end, the Office for National Statistics said gross domestic product – the total value of goods and services in the economy – fell by 0.8% in the three months to June. The size of the drop surprised the City, which had expected only a 0.3% decline following recent signs of a pickup in the housing market and strong growth in high street spending.

But although the news caused the pound to fall 0.5% against the dollar to $1.64, the FTSE 100 saw its 10th straight day of gains, ending up 16.8 points, or 0.4%, at 4,577.

Economists believe GDP will almost certainly contract by more than the Treasury’s forecast of between –3.25% and –3.75% this year.

“It would be a miracle [if the government's target was met],” said Colin Ellis, European economist at Daiwa Securities SMBC. “Not on the scale of water into wine but not far off.”

The economy has already contracted by 3.16% this year and analysts are predicting a drop of 4.5% for 2009 as a whole.

Hetal Mehta, senior economic adviser to the Ernst & Young Item Club, said the economy would have to grow by 1% in the third quarter of the year and by 1.8% in the final three months to meet the government’s target of –3.75%.

The Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, Vince Cable, said: “These figures blow a hole in the chancellor’s GDP forecast for this year. The government’s failure to address the crisis in bank lending is only making the economic outlook worse. As a result, the deficit will balloon further, leading to bigger spending cuts or higher taxes.” The shadow chancellor, George Osborne, said: “These disappointing figures are much worse than expected and show that the recession is longer and deeper than the government had led us to believe. The sad news is this will mean the rise in unemployment is likely to be even steeper.”

Before yesterday’s data, some economists had even predicted the UK could post its first positive growth since early 2008, and the size of the decline prompted immediate speculation that the Bank of England would be forced into fresh emergency action to kickstart activity.

While the pace of decline in GDP slowed from the 2.4% seen in the first three months of 2009, the economy has suffered a cumulative contraction of 5.7% in the last five quarters.

The ONS said this was double the drop in the recession of the early 1990s and almost as big as the 6.4% retrenchment during the 1980-81 slump. The 5.6% drop in GDP in a year has not been matched since comparable records began in 1955.

Business services and finances, a sector that has boomed for much of the last decade, accounted for more than a quarter of the GDP decline in the second quarter. Overall, services fell by 0.6% on the quarter and by 3.8% on the year.

Describing the figures as “shockingly bad” Vicky Redwood, UK economist at Capital Economics, said they “firmly dash any hopes that the UK had already pulled out of recession”. Getting the economy back on track “looks likely to be a long hard slog”, she said.

The TUC’s general secretary, Brendan Barber, said: “There are no green shoots here. Unemployment is growing and a recovery that brings hope to the jobless looks ever more distant.

“Immediate big spending cuts are the last thing we need. They could tip the economy into an ever deeper downturn and make the deficit worse when the tax take falls and spending on unemployment goes up.”

Meanwhile, US consumer confidence fell this month to its lowest level since April amid growing pessimism about the long-term economic outlook, especially about income and jobs.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Unemployment highest since 1995

The number of people claiming jobseeker’s allowance increased by a relatively small 23,800 in June to 1.56 million

Unemployment shot up by a record 281,000 in the three months to May, with the jobless rate topping 10% in one region for the first time in this recession, official data shows.

The rise took the jobless total to 2.38 million, the highest level since 1995, on the broadest Labour Force Survey measure of unemployment by the Office for National Statistics.

Youth unemployment jumped to a 16-year high of 726,000 after a quarterly rise of 95,000 – the biggest on record – and the number of people out of work for longer than a year rose by 46,000 to 528,000, the highest for 11 years.

The West Midlands was the hardest hit region, with joblessness jumping to 10.3%. The north-east, Yorkshire and Humber, and London were next in line, but the south-east fared best, at 6.1% unemployment.

Brendan Barber, general secretary of the TUC, said the figures were “truly horrendous. It’s particularly worrying that over half a million unemployed people have been out of work for at least a year. With a new generation of school and college leavers soon starting to look for work, our unemployment crisis will get even bigger,” he warned.

Prof David Blanchflower, the Bank of England’s former labour market expert, said: “There is absolutely no sign that the recession is over. It seems to be worsening. There has been a very worrying rise in unemployment amongst the young and they are not eligible for benefits.”

He said this was part of the reason why the ONS had reported the smallest rise in unemployment measured on claimants, which rose by only 23,800 in June. Most young people are not eligible for jobseeker’s allowance.

The figures also suggested people were coming off the claimant count to go into part-time jobs because they could not find full-time employment. Philip Shaw, an economist at Investec Bank, said the claimant count figures had become unreliable, “biased down by individuals moving off the count on to government schemes such as the New Deal”.

Jaguar LandRover announced it will stop producing its X-Type at the Halewood plant on Merseyside, with the loss of up to 300 jobs. David Kern, chief economist at the British Chambers of Commerce, predicted unemployment would peak at about 3.2 million next year.

The figures also showed the number of people in work fell by 269,000 in the latest quarter to 29 million, after a record fall of 0.9% in the employment rate to 72.9%. More than 300,000 people were made redundant in the three months to May, the second highest figure on record, and a rise of 31,000 on the previous quarter. Vacancies fell to a record 429,000 in the three months to June, down by 35,000 from the previous quarter.

Manufacturing jobs continued to fall, down 201,000 over the past year to a low of 2.6 million. Average earnings, excluding bonus payments, increased by 2.6% in the year to May, the lowest figure since comparable records began in 2001, confounding last year’s Bank of England prediction that pay deals would soar this year.

The Centre for Cities thinktank is releasing a report today suggesting Swansea, Newcastle and Ipswich could suffer badly when public sector job cuts begin after 2011. It predicts that in the three years after that, 290,000 jobs will be lost in the public sector.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Retirement age review brought forward

Government brings forward plans to look again at what age employees will be forced to retire

A review of the default retirement age, which allows employers to force staff to retire at 65, is to be brought forward by a year, the government announced today.

Ministers had previously pledged to look again at the measure in 2011, but it will now be held next year to respond to “changing demographic and economic circumstances.”

Pensions minister Angela Eagle said most people retired before 65, but 1.3 million chose to work beyond state pension age and many more said they would work past 65 if their employer permitted it.

The minister said it was time to look again at the default retirement age: “Some people prefer to take early retirement, others prefer to keep working. We want to give older people flexible retirement options.

“The government is responding to the changed economic landscape. The different circumstances today – for businesses, and for individuals coming up to retirement – suggest that an earlier review is appropriate.

“As Britain’s demographics change it is sensible that we have the debate on what works for business and individuals. The retirement laws need to reflect modern social and economic circumstances.”

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber welcomed the announcement. He said: “It cannot be right that an employer can sack someone simply for being too old. Employees should have choice – neither forced by employers to give up work, nor forced by inadequate pensions into working longer than they should.

“A key challenge as we live and stay active longer is developing the right kind of jobs, support and training for older workers.”

Michelle Mitchell, charity director for Age Concern and Help the Aged, described the move as a “step in the right direction,” but said it was not enough.

“The government should immediately put a stop to an arbitrary and unfair rule which stops people from working, simply because of their age.

“Older workers make a huge contribution to the economy and will have the skills and experience needed to boost recovery as we come out of recession.

“Many older people want to be able to continue to work beyond 65. For some this is because they need to boost their pensions or simply pay the bills, but for many it is because they love their jobs and see no need to stop working when they can still do them well.”

Legal challenges

Earlier, a panel of judges heard that a legal challenge by a solicitor forced to retire at 65 could affect every employee in the country.

The government has intervened in the case of Leslie Seldon, who claims he was discriminated against on grounds of age when his firm, Clarkson Wright Jakes, asked him to leave at the normal retirement age in line with his partnership agreement.

Dinah Rose QC, acting for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, said the case raised “important questions of policy and principle”.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission is intervening in a separate legal challenge next Thursday in the High Court over compulsory retirement in a case brought against the government by Age Concern and Help the Aged. It will decide if the UK’s default retirement age can be justified under EU law.

Scores of age discrimination claims are waiting in the pipeline for the outcome of these challenges. The judges will reserve their ruling tomorrow.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds