RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘case’

Swine flu strikes Downing Street adviser

The first case of swine flu has struck Downing Street and it nearly caused a diplomatic crisis.

Gordon Brown’s senior climate change adviser Michael Jacobs was banned from attending the G8 summit in Italy for fear he would pass the contagious disease to Barack Obama and other world leaders.

It is understood that Jacobs contracted the disease while involved in climate change talks in Mexico.

He had travelled to Rome for some preliminary negotiations on the draft of the G8 communique text, and was told by his personal doctor that he was no longer suffering from the disease. He then planned to travel to the conference site in L’Aquila, Italy, but was told by Brown that he could not risk him going.

The prime minister told Jacobs it would be diplomatically disastrous if Britain was responsible for infecting the G8′s leaders. Instead, Jacobs followed negotiations by phone.

A Downing Street source said there was no evidence that anyone else in Brown’s entourage has contracted swine flu and that if they had, proper procedures for decontamination will be followed.

Jacobs is seen as the one of the best informed climate change specialists in Britain and his absence from the talks was regarded as a significant loss. He made no mention of contracting the disease or the ban imposed on him when he sent out a circular to those interested in climate change setting out the outcome of the negotiations, and the problems that lie ahead in securing a deal at Copenhagen at the end of the year.

Jacobs, former general secretary of the Fabian Society, clearly did not regard his absence as fatal to the outcome of the summit since he pointed out in his email to green groups that five big achievements had been secured at the L’Aquila talks,

For the first time the G8 and developing nations agreed that the science demanded global average temperatures rise by only 2C on preindustrial levels.

“Until a few weeks ago, in fact in the case of the developing countries until a few days ago we did not believe we were going to get this agreement,” he said.

Secondly, the G8 agreed to cut its own emissions by 80% by 2050.

He also said it was now possible to see an agreement to cut global emissions by half at Copenhagen, the aim of the talks. The G8 meetings had seen developing countries for the first time accept the concept that their emissions were peaking, Jacobs said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Swine flu strikes Downing Street adviser

The first case of swine flu has struck Downing Street and it nearly caused a diplomatic crisis.

Gordon Brown’s senior climate change adviser Michael Jacobs was banned from attending the G8 summit in Italy for fear he would pass the contagious disease to Barack Obama and other world leaders.

It is understood that Jacobs contracted the disease while involved in climate change talks in Mexico.

He had travelled to Rome for some preliminary negotiations on the draft of the G8 communique text, and was told by his personal doctor that he was no longer suffering from the disease. He then planned to travel to the conference site in L’Aquila, Italy, but was told by Brown that he could not risk him going.

The prime minister told Jacobs it would be diplomatically disastrous if Britain was responsible for infecting the G8′s leaders. Instead, Jacobs followed negotiations by phone.

A Downing Street source said there was no evidence that anyone else in Brown’s entourage has contracted swine flu and that if they had, proper procedures for decontamination will be followed.

Jacobs is seen as the one of the best informed climate change specialists in Britain and his absence from the talks was regarded as a significant loss. He made no mention of contracting the disease or the ban imposed on him when he sent out a circular to those interested in climate change setting out the outcome of the negotiations, and the problems that lie ahead in securing a deal at Copenhagen at the end of the year.

Jacobs, former general secretary of the Fabian Society, clearly did not regard his absence as fatal to the outcome of the summit since he pointed out in his email to green groups that five big achievements had been secured at the L’Aquila talks,

For the first time the G8 and developing nations agreed that the science demanded global average temperatures rise by only 2C on preindustrial levels.

“Until a few weeks ago, in fact in the case of the developing countries until a few days ago we did not believe we were going to get this agreement,” he said.

Secondly, the G8 agreed to cut its own emissions by 80% by 2050.

He also said it was now possible to see an agreement to cut global emissions by half at Copenhagen, the aim of the talks. The G8 meetings had seen developing countries for the first time accept the concept that their emissions were peaking, Jacobs said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Nelson Montana: Obama’s Health Care Reform Won’t Fly: But This Will

It’s time to pull the plug. Call off the resuscitation team. Bring in the coroner. Health care reform is dead. Obama gave it a good shot, but it was doomed from the start.

Pakistan to try Mumbai suspects

Muslims protest in Mumbai

Pakistan says the trial of five men suspected of involvement in the attack on the Taj Hotel in Mumbai last November is likely to start next week.

Interior Minister Rehman Malik said investigations were complete for these suspects and named another 12 men still wanted in connection with the case.

The charges show Pakistan is serious in pursuing suspects in the case despite Indian claims to the contrary, he said.

More than 170 people died in the attacks, including nine gunmen.

India has accused Pakistan-based fighters from the banned militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba of carrying out the attacks.

Pakistan has admitted they were partly planned on its soil and the two countries have suffered seriously strained relations.

Timing

Mr Malik blamed India for any delay in bringing the charges.

He said Pakistan had sent India a list of questions on 12 February but only received answers on 9 June. This had enabled them to put a case together against five suspects already in custody.

There was no immediate response to the claims from Delhi.

Mr Malik said that after seeing how this investigation had been pursued, no-one should be in any doubt that Pakistan was serious in pursuing those responsible for the attacks.

"We are pretty sure that based on the evidence which our investigators have collected, the culprits will be punished," he said.

He said that he wished India had given as much co-operation in finding those responsible for killing Pakistanis when a cross-border train was blown up in February 2007.

The dossier detailing the charges against the five suspects for the Mumbai (Bombay) attack has been handed to the acting Indian high commissioner in Islamabad.

The BBC’s David Loyn in Islamabad says politically this development could not have come at a more opportune time for Pakistan.

The foreign ministers and prime ministers of Pakistan and India will meet next week during the summit of non-aligned nations in Egypt.

In order to begin dialogue again on its terms, Pakistan is eager to counter Indian accusations that it has not done all it can to pursue those responsible for the Mumbai attacks.

Mr Malik said that 15,000 Pakistani citizens had died in terrorist attacks since 2001.

"The terrorist threat in the region knew no boundaries and no-one has been more affected than Pakistan."</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Jackson Kids Update: Guardianship Case Delayed One Week

LOS ANGELES — Michael Jackson’s mother and ex-wife time will have time to reach an agreement over who will take care of the singer’s three children.

For the second time, Katherine Jackson and Deborah Rowe joined to seek a delay in a hea…

Judges attack MoD over Iraq information

Three senior judges today delivered a blistering attack on the Ministry of Defence, accusing its officials of misleading the high court and of “lamentable” conduct over attempts to suppress information on the interrogation of Iraqi detainees.

Lord Justice Scott Baker and Mr Justices Silber and Sweeney described claims made by defence ministers in gagging orders as false. The claims led to decisions that the court had made, to suppress evidence, that were “wrong”.

Bob Ainsworth, the defence secretary, was forced this week to concede an independent inquiry into allegations that 20 Iraqis taken as prisoners to Camp Abu Naji, an army base in Amara, north of Basra, were interrogated and tortured before being killed. Six others were allegedly abused. The MoD says the 20 who died were killed “on the battlefield” and that only nine prisoners were taken to the camp, all of whom were left alive.

Ainsworth was forced to make his concession because of the MoD’s failure to disclose key documents.

In a move reflecting their fury at the ministry and what they have castigated as a “complete waste of time”, the judges awarded lawyers for the Iraqis an interim order of $1m. They have already ordered that the MoD must pay the total cost of the hearings – a legal challenge to claims that the MoD did not carry out a proper investigation at the time of the incident – estimated to amount to tens of millions of pounds.

In their ruling today, the judges stated: “The court was misled into making a number of rulings on a false basis all of which were wrong and should never have been made.” They said they did not blame Ainsworth, but officials advising him.

The central issue is the MoD’s claim that there would be “real harm” to national security if documents relating to the interrogation by soldiers of detainees were disclosed. The MoD admitted this week that some of the information had already been disclosed, some in evidence at a court martial, some to the public inquiry into the death of Baha Mousa, a Basra hotel receptionist, in the custody of British soldiers, in 2003.

The picture that emerged from the MoD’s handling of the case, and assertions its officials had made, were “truly alarming”, the judges said. The history of the case was “lamentable”, they said.

MoD officials must have known that documents they now wanted to suppress were already in the public domain, the judges added. “There have been … both systemic and individual failures within the MoD on a substantial scale in this case. Put bluntly the left hand did not know what the right hand had done, or was doing, and even when it did, nothing was done to seek to correct the situation.”

How MoD officials could make “grossly erroneous” claims remained unclear, the judges added. The MoD denies the allegations but now faces an independent inquiry to make its case.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


MySpace ‘suicide bully cleared’

A US judge has acquitted a Missouri woman over her role in a computer hoax directed at a 13-year-old neighbour who later killed herself.

District Judge George Wu stressed the ruling in the case of Lori Drew was tentative until issued in writing.

Drew, 50, was convicted last year after allegedly creating a fake MySpace page to find out what Megan Meier was saying about her daughter.

After the fake boy "dumped" Ms Meier online, she committed suicide.

Drew was found guilty in November of illegally accessing computers.

‘Public symbol’

But the judge said on Thursday that if she had been convicted for breaking the social networking site’s terms of service, "you could prosecute pretty much anyone who violated terms of service".

Lori Drew leaves an LA Court 18 May

Posing as "Josh Evans", Drew started an online relationship with her teenage neighbour, before apparently staging a falling-out and sending a message that "the world would be better off without" her.

She hanged herself a short time later in October 2006.

During court proceedings, Drew’s lawyer argued that "the government’s case is all about making Lori Drew a public symbol of cyber-bullying".

"The government has created a fiction that Lori Drew somehow caused [Megan's] death, and it wants a long prison sentence to make its fiction seem real."

But federal prosecutor Tom O’Brien said he stood by his decision to prosecute.

"I’m proud of this case," he said. "This is a case that called out for someone to do something. It was a risk. But this office will always take risks on behalf of children.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.