RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘company’

Phoenix Four net another £3.5m

Further return for buyers of failed car manufacturer

The Phoenix Four business executives who bought MG Rover from BMW in 2000 have received a further £3.5m in dividends and share payments in the four years since its collapse.

The cash has come from their investment in MGR Capital, a car finance joint venture with a subsidiary of banking group HBOS, now part of Lloyds TSB.

MGR Capital, which bought the Rover cars finance and lease loan book from BMW for £313m in 2001, was wound up last year. The Phoenix Four could also be entitled to a further windfall of £12m from the assets from the wind-up according to company accounts, although their spokesman disputed this figure.

Government inspectors completed a four-year inquiry last week into the collapse of MG Rover and the role of the Phoenix Four: John Towers, Nick Stephenson, John Edwards and Peter Beale. But the report will not be released until a further investigation has been undertaken by the Serious Fraud Office.

When Phoenix Venture Holdings, (PVH) the four men’s master company, and MG Rover’s parent bought Rover Financial Services, it said the acquisition was a significant achievement.

But the interest in MGR Capital was acquired independently of PVH through a company called the Phoenix Partnership. This is owned partly by Edwards and Beale who were both directors of MGR Capital, with the four men each taking £500,000 of preference capital in the business. HBOS owns the balance of the company. The preference shares have provided a dividend of around £100,000 a year for each of the Phoenix Four. Late last year they redeemed the preference shares, netting them a collective windfall of £2m.

Redemption of the preference shares was a precursor to the winding up of MGR Capital. The company was no longer trading because the loan book had been exhausted.

Net assets stood at £23m at the end of 2008. A simple extrapolation suggests the shares held by Edwards and Beale would net them a return of around £12m from the wind-up of MGR Capital. Given that HBOS and Phoenix each own 50% of MGR Capital’s shares this suggests they would each be entitled to half the company’s net assets.

In a written statement, a Phoenix spokesman confirmed the businessmen had received £1.5m in dividends from MGR Capital as well as their original £500,000 investments each. But he said there had been no further funds distributed to the group. “Any other share redemption will be retained by HBOS.”

At the time of the Rover collapse, the Phoenix Four pledged to put any of the assets and funds recovered into a trust to benefit employees.

If the four benefit from their share of the assets left in MGR Capital, it will swell the bounty from their association with MG Rover to £50m, although they dispute this figure. They are also accused of taking more than £40m in pay and pensions from the collapsed carmaker.

In a dossier issued by their public relations advisers the four argued they had been victims of a smear campaign. “The mythical figure of ‘£40m’ in payments to the Phoenix directors is entirely inaccurate and is based on erroneous and mischievous DTI press briefings. It is not supported by published Phoenix Venture Holdings accounts,” it said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Phoenix Four net another £3.5m

Further return for buyers of failed car manufacturer

The Phoenix Four business executives who bought MG Rover from BMW in 2000 have received a further £3.5m in dividends and share payments in the four years since its collapse.

The cash has come from their investment in MGR Capital, a car finance joint venture with a subsidiary of banking group HBOS, now part of Lloyds TSB.

MGR Capital, which bought the Rover cars finance and lease loan book from BMW for £313m in 2001, was wound up last year. The Phoenix Four could also be entitled to a further windfall of £12m from the assets from the wind-up according to company accounts, although their spokesman disputed this figure.

Government inspectors completed a four-year inquiry last week into the collapse of MG Rover and the role of the Phoenix Four: John Towers, Nick Stephenson, John Edwards and Peter Beale. But the report will not be released until a further investigation has been undertaken by the Serious Fraud Office.

When Phoenix Venture Holdings, (PVH) the four men’s master company, and MG Rover’s parent bought Rover Financial Services, it said the acquisition was a significant achievement.

But the interest in MGR Capital was acquired independently of PVH through a company called the Phoenix Partnership. This is owned partly by Edwards and Beale who were both directors of MGR Capital, with the four men each taking £500,000 of preference capital in the business. HBOS owns the balance of the company. The preference shares have provided a dividend of around £100,000 a year for each of the Phoenix Four. Late last year they redeemed the preference shares, netting them a collective windfall of £2m.

Redemption of the preference shares was a precursor to the winding up of MGR Capital. The company was no longer trading because the loan book had been exhausted.

Net assets stood at £23m at the end of 2008. A simple extrapolation suggests the shares held by Edwards and Beale would net them a return of around £12m from the wind-up of MGR Capital. Given that HBOS and Phoenix each own 50% of MGR Capital’s shares this suggests they would each be entitled to half the company’s net assets.

In a written statement, a Phoenix spokesman confirmed the businessmen had received £1.5m in dividends from MGR Capital as well as their original £500,000 investments each. But he said there had been no further funds distributed to the group. “Any other share redemption will be retained by HBOS.”

At the time of the Rover collapse, the Phoenix Four pledged to put any of the assets and funds recovered into a trust to benefit employees.

If the four benefit from their share of the assets left in MGR Capital, it will swell the bounty from their association with MG Rover to £50m, although they dispute this figure. They are also accused of taking more than £40m in pay and pensions from the collapsed carmaker.

In a dossier issued by their public relations advisers the four argued they had been victims of a smear campaign. “The mythical figure of ‘£40m’ in payments to the Phoenix directors is entirely inaccurate and is based on erroneous and mischievous DTI press briefings. It is not supported by published Phoenix Venture Holdings accounts,” it said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Second death near Indonesia mine

Map

A security guard has been shot dead outside an Indonesian mine operated by the US company Freeport.

The attack, in Papua province, comes a day after an Australian man working for the company was shot dead in an ambush.

Police said suspected separatist militants had opened fire on officers investigating the earlier attack.

The huge Grasberg mine is a source of friction with local people, who have complained about its environmental impact and their share of its revenue.

Supporters of Papuan independence see the mine as a symbol of unfair rule from Jakarta. Two Americans and an Indonesian were shot dead in an ambush there in 2002.

A police spokesman was quoted by local media as saying that police engaged armed men in a gunbattle after the killing of the guard, named as Markus Rattealo, an employee of Freeport’s Indonesian subsidiary.

One report said five people were injured in the attack.

The resource-rich Papua province has been embroiled in separatist insurgency since the end of Dutch colonial rule in 1962.

The mine has some of the world’s largest recoverable copper and gold reserves. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Power completely cut off to Serb enclave

A Kosovo company distributing electricity has cut off the Serbs living in Sirnićka Župa region from the power grid at midnight. The households there were previously allowed to use the so-called humanitarian electricity, when they were reconnected daily from midnight until 7 o’clock in the morning.

Rebecca Walker: The Untouchable Michael Jackson

We use his death, as we used his life, as a mirror. There is no room for Michael. It is still, tragically, all about us.

Steve Parker: What!?! Bob Lutz back at GM!

General Motors has come out of bankruptcy after a somewhat-biblical 40 days and nights of massive reorganization, as a new, smaller company more than 60%…

Leaner GM emerges from bankruptcy

GM headquarters

General Motors (GM) has emerged from bankruptcy after signing a deal allowing it to sell its best assets to a "new GM", reports say.

News agencies, quoting unnamed sources, reported that the US government and GM signed the documents at 1030 GMT, ending its 40-day bankruptcy.

Official confirmation is expected when GM holds a press conference later.

The new, leaner GM will own the company’s key assets such as Buick and will be 61% owned by the US government.

GM is in the process of selling off its other brands such as Hummer, Saab and its GM Europe arm, which owns Vauxhall and Opel.

GM filed for bankruptcy protection on 1 June, saying it would be forced to liquidate if the plan was not approved.

A new, smaller GM is being created with a reduced workforce, smaller dealer network and less debt.

It will operate the strongest parts of the old company, with only its Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC brands remaining. Its European operation, Opel, with its UK brand Vauxhall, is being sold off.

The firm is getting $60bn (£37.3bn) in financing from the US Treasury, which gives the US government a 61% share in the new GM, while the United Auto Workers union will have 17.5%.

Canada’s government will have a 12% share and GM bondholders will own about 10% in the new company.


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

GM reborn after 40 bankruptcy days

‘Business as usual is over at GM,’ said CEO Fritz Henderson

America’s biggest carmaker, General Motors, won a second chance to prove itself as a profitable motor manufacturer today as it emerged from bankruptcy at lightning speed after a remarkably swift, smooth financial restructuring.

After just 40 days under court-supervised protection from its creditors, GM was resurrected as a solvent business shortly after 6.30am when lawyers, completing an all-night paperwork session, signed over its factories, stocks, equipment and intellectual property to a new entity controlled by the US government.

GM’s chief executive, Fritz Henderson, pledged to pay back $50bn (£30.9bn) of public loans well in advance of a deadline of 2015 and promised that the streamlined company would be a nimbler, less bureaucratic and more decisive organisation. GM will focus on four vehicle brands – Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC.

“Business as usual is over at GM,” said Henderson at a press conference in Detroit. “Today, we take the intensity, decisiveness and speed of the past several months and transfer it from the triage of the bankruptcy process to the creation and operation of a new General Motors.”

He continued: “We recognise that we’ve been given a rare second chance at GM, and we are very grateful for that. And we appreciate the fact that we now have the tools to get the job done.”

The US government owns 60.8% of the new GM, while Canada’s government holds 11.7% and a union-controlled pension fund has 17.5%. Creditors of the old company, who were owed $27bn (£16.67), were compensated with a stake of just 10% to the dismay of Wall Street bondholders who fought a short, unsuccessful battle for a larger slice.

President Obama had initially predicted that reforming GM would take 60 to 90 days. But creditors’ objections were decisively thrown out by a New York bankruptcy judge, Robert Gerber, in a resounding win for the administration’s auto restructuring taskforce.

“This is a major victory for the Obama administration over Wall Street,” said Aaron Bragman, a motor industry analyst at IHS Global Insight in Detroit. “The government really put the screws on bondholders and enforced a deal on them that it thought was suitable.”

After swapping loans for equity, the new GM has debt of $48bn (£29.6bn), compared to the $170bn (£105bn) burden when it filed for chapter 11 protection. But the transformation has been painful for thousands of employees, parts suppliers and car dealers.

Once cutbacks are complete in 2011, GM is likely to have just 38,000 blue-collar factory workers in the US, compared to 113,000 three years ago. The number of GM plants will fall from 47 to 31 and, through a clear-out of senior management, GM’s executive team will shrink by 35%.

The firm, which was once the largest corporation in America, is in the process of selling international names including Saab, Vauxhall, Opel and Hummer as part of its downsizing. In Britain, the decision to offload GM’s European operations has cast a cloud of uncertainty over 5,500 jobs at Vauxhall factories in Luton and Ellesmere Port, Cheshire.

Henderson said GM’s emergence from the bankruptcy courts would allow “every employee, including me, to get back to the business of designing, building and selling great cars and trucks”.

He insisted that GM could shake off its reputation for uninspirational designs and slow-moving bureaucracy.

“Einstein’s definition of insane is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results,” said Henderson. “We know we have to change.”

Among GM’s priorities will be the development of environmentally-friendly vehicles such as the electrically powered GM Volt, which is due to be launched by the end of next year. GM executives have even reportedly mulled changing the company’s distinctive blue logo to a green hue, although Henderson said he did not plan to do this.

New initiatives include a joint venture with the website eBay to explore ways of auctioning cars online, and a forum called ‘Ask Fritz’ in which customers will be able to share suggestions with the chief executive.

But financial experts warned that the company faces challenges in winning back the trust of customers and the financial community.

“The legacy costs are gone. The challenge in the future is how to approach a marketplace that has been burned by GM,” said Pete Hastings, a credit analyst at Morgan Keegan.

Along with its rival Chrysler which also recently went through bankruptcy, GM has been hit by the worst slump in US vehicle sales since the second world war. The company has struggled to cope with high petrol prices, a change in tastes towards smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles and fierce competition from Asian rivals. It has lost its title as the world’s leading carmaker to Japan’s Toyota.

A new chairman, former AT&T boss Edward Whitacre, will preside over GM’s board. He told reporters: “For 100 years, General Motors was among the world’s greatest companies. It deserves to be there again and it will be there again.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Green Britain Day is a PR distraction

Greening Britain is a serious goal that requires a vision underpinned by real policies with meaningful outcomes

I’d like to declare today to be Greenwash Day. To celebrate that relatively modern phenomenon of companies trying to sell themselves as being rather greener and more ethical than they really are. Today would be an apt day, it is after all – Green Britain Day. Where’s the Greenwash in that? Oh, where to start.

Green Britain day comes to us courtesy of EDF. That’s Electricité de France to give them their full name. EDF is a state-owned French nuclear power company. They are also the world’s biggest corporate producer of nuclear waste, one of the biggest traders and burners of coal, and have a tiny tiny fleet of windmills (0.7% of their generation). And to promote this campaign they’ve “borrowed” (as Fred Pearce gently puts it) someone else’s logo – the green union flag. This flag symbolises two things: care for the environment and British identity. EDF can claim, of course, neither.

This really does take greenwash to a whole new level. It could almost be the plot of a farce. If it wasn’t for the fact that EDF is seriously intent on convincing us in Britain that it – and nuclear energy – are green and good for Britain.

Stealing someone else’s clothes is not a new tactic in the world of dirty big business. And neither is greenwash.

A few years ago the UK witnessed “fairwash”, where years of pioneering work on the concept of Fairtrade were swamped by a tidal wave of big-budget corporate lookalike schemes. Everybody and their brother now has a version of Fairtrade. It might be tempting to say where’s the harm in that, the more people doing it the better. Well yes, if they truly are doing it, I would agree. But that’s not how this usually goes down. When big brands move into the ethical arena it’s for the kudos, to look like a better company, to follow a new trend and gain sales – it isn’t for the cause, it’s for their cause, which is of course to make money and to add “shareholder value”.

Pale corporate imitations of green and ethical brands or products are truly harmful. They distract consumers and divert spending from the real thing and they bring the risk of early onset “issue fatigue”. You know how it goes – yawn, yawn, here’s another company that says it pays its suppliers a decent price because it really cares about them or says it’s really committed to fighting climate change. Or whatever …

Maybe we need a regulator for environmental and ethical claims. We’ve got Ofgem for electricity and Ofwat for water – I propose we should name this one Ethoff.

Let’s come back to Green Britain Day. The campaign itself has laudable aims, fighting climate change and making Britain a greener place. Who could argue with that? But look for any substance and you won’t find it. It’s all recycled and gimmicky.

And it’s a distraction. Green Britain is a serious goal, it requires a vision underpinned by real policies, a suite of joined up actions that we can all get behind – with meaningful outcomes. It’s a mission not a PR opportunity.

• Dale Vince is the founder and owner of Ecotricity

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Anglo American set for Xstrata fight

Sir John Parker, the chairman of the UK’s National Grid, takes role as mining company fights unwanted takeover bid

Anglo American has appointed Sir John Parker as chairman to bolster the mining company’s defences against an unwanted takeover bid from rival Xstrata.

Parker joins the board with immediate effect and will become chairman on 1 August. He succeeds Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, who is retiring after seven years as chairman.

Parker, who is well-respected in the City, is chairman of the UK’s National Grid. In South Africa, where Anglo was founded and still has many operations, he shares with Cyril Ramaphosa the chairmanship of the Mondi Group, the paper producer that was spun off from Anglo two years ago.

He is expected to relinquish several of his other commitments; recently, he stepped down as chair of the court of the Bank of England.

Last month, Anglo American rejected an all-share offer from Xstrata, headed by the South African-born Mick Davis, as “totally unacceptable”. The combined group would have a market value of more than £40bn.

Moody-Stuart said the board’s decision to recruit Parker after a global search that took several months was unanimous. “Sir John is recognised as a highly experienced and independent chairman, has chaired four FTSE 100 companies and brings a wealth of leadership experience across a range of industries in many countries, including in South Africa,” he said.

Parker said: “With deep roots in South Africa, a country I know very well through my years at Babcock International and my more recent role at Mondi working jointly with Cyril Ramaphosa, this global company has an opportunity to deliver considerable further growth and value in the coming years.”

Ramaphosa, a former South African union leader and head of the African National Congress, had also been shortlisted for Anglo’s chairmanship.

The takeover battle took an unusual turn yesterday when Cynthia Carroll, Anglo’s chief executive, became the target of a sexist rant from the group’s former deputy chairman, Graham Boustred. He also said Anglo was a disaster and the board had to be swept aside. “The only way for it to be swept aside is for Mick Davis to succeed with his bid.”

Carroll has been criticised by some investors for scrapping Anglo’s dividend, showing poor leadership and overpaying for assets.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Schmidt to address Apple concerns

Google boss Eric Schmidt says he will have to discuss his role as director of Silicon Valley rival Apple in the wake of his company’s decision to launch its own computer operating system.

Schmidt, who has been on the board of Apple since 2006, said he would be talking to Steve Jobs and others after some critics voiced concerns over a possible conflict of interest.

“I’ll talk to the Apple people,” he told reporters on Thursday. “At the moment, there’s no issue.”

Google said on Tuesday that it was planning to launch a new operating system next year, called Google Chrome OS. News of the system – which will be aimed at the users of small laptop computers – created enormous buzz, as the clearest signal yet that Google intends to directly challenge Microsoft’s Windows and its continuing dominance of the computer industry.

However the announcement – which was possibly timed to spoil a similar announcement due next week from Microsoft – also meant that Google is more directly competing with Apple, which makes its own operating system.

Schmidt’s role at the trendy maker of the iPod and iPhone has already been under fire for the two company’s interests in mobile phone systems and web browsers, and the Google chief executive recuses himself from the discussion of Apple’s iPhone during board meetings to avoid conflicts.

Despite scrutiny from US regulators over so-called “interlocking directorships” – who are concerned that the link could promote collusion, Schmidt has said in the past that he had never considered quitting his board role.

His latest comments came at the Sun Valley conference in Idaho, where an exclusive guest list of the world’s most powerful media executives are gathered for a retreat. Earlier in the day he had enjoyed lunch with Bill Gates, despite their rivalry, though it is believed the two did not discuss recent events.

This year, alongside moguls including Rupert Murdoch, Barry Diller and Warren Buffett, the event is also playing host to senior technology industry figures – including Schmidt, Gates, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

The Sun Valley conference, organised by investment bank Allen & Co, famously acts as a relaxed retreat where the press are barred and powerful media executives can talk business while engaging in activities such as biking, hiking and playing golf.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Small Business Internships

Most small businesses are always in need of extra help for lots of tasks around the company. Entrepreneurs have a tendency to run their business with a “do it yourself” mentality, which is great for cost-cutting but also bad for productivity reasons. If you’re the head of the company, it can be difficult to “let [...]

‘Chevrolet Group’

Is the pending creation of a ‘New GM’ via a spell in Chapter 11 also a good point at which to consider some corporate re-branding? Yes.


It could be a way to jettison some of the negative baggage that comes with maintaining the name of the failed company, while emphasising that the new company really is a full-on fresh start – a new beginning. Hell, there’s a whole new name and the General is really gone.


Unlike Ford, ‘GM’ itself doesn’t figure too much as a brand on yer actual vehicles. It’s primarily a group umbrella brand that is perhaps crying out to be dropped or changed.


A re-branding would also provide an opportunity to elevate a constituent brand – one that is vital and already pre-eminent in the company’s future plans. Chevrolet fits the bill. Chevrolet is a globally crucial brand for New GM. It’s already established as a high performing brand in long-term automotive growth markets like Russia and China. It also has that striking gold bow-tie logo that is surely ready-to-go for corporate branding.


‘Chevrolet Motors’? You could maybe add the word ‘American’, too – highlighting the new company’s geographical origin and that it is actually more than just Chevrolet. ‘Chevrolet American Motors’? Mind you, there has already been an ‘American Motors’, and maybe throwing the word American in there doesn’t quite work for a global company.


Dunno. Maybe Chevrolet Group is the way to go, keeping it simple. Or how about GM2? No, that’s horrendous.


And no, I don’t think Government Motors – a mocking term bandied about by critics of the Obama administrations actions – quite works. 


Anyone else out there got any suggestions?   

ANALYSIS: New GM needs a new name

Guardian Launches Full RSS Feeds, First Media Company Not To Suppress RSS Adoption

On the eve of The Guardian’s launch of full text RSS feeds, Matt McAlister, Head of Guardian Developer Network, pinged me looking for examples of other mainstream media companies that have full text RSS feeds. Surely this many years into the age of syndication, Guardian couldn’t be the first mainstream media company to adopt full [...]

ASBIS to Start Distribution of Corsair Memory

ASBIS has been set up as the official distributor of Corsair Memory in the territory of Ukraine. Corsair Memory, a US-based company, has been a leader in the design and manufacture of high-speed modules since 1994. The company focuses on supporting the special demands of mission-critical servers and high-end workstations, as well as the performance demands of extreme gamers and overclockers.

It has been a great pleasure working with you in the year 2004!

Dear partners! It has been a great pleasure working with you in the year 2004! In appreciation of our cooperation over the past year our entire multinational company joins in sending our very best wishes for a Happy Holiday Season to you and your organizations!