RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Court’

Sweden appeals Assange bail decision

WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange has been freed on bail by a UK court today, “to cheers from inside and outside the court”, the Guardian reports. But Assange will stay in detention tonight after Swedish prosecutors’ move to appeal the British court’s decision to grant him bail on allegations of rape in Stockholm.

Sunni Waqf Board to move Supreme Court against Ayodhya verdict

ayodhya verdict25The Sunni Central Waqf Board is expected to file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, challenging the Allahabad High Court verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suits. Advocate Zafaryab Jilani, who appeared for the Board in the High Court, confirmed that they were moving the Supreme Court on Tuesday. [...]

Merčep in custody for one month

The Zagreb County Court court decided on Monday to keep Tomislav Merčep in custody for one month on suspicion that he committed war crimes. Merčep was assistant interior minister and commander of a special police unit during the early 1990s conflict.

‘Generals can be served notices’


ISLAMABAD – A four-member bench of the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the objection raised by the PCO judges in a contempt of court case and rejected their plea for reconstitution of new bench.
Head of the bench Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui while announcing the verdict, remarked that the objection raised by PCO judgesÂ’ counsel are not valid. Therefore, the request is dismissed, the objections are not enough for the recusal of the judges from the bench and to reconstitute the bench, he added.
Dr Abdul Basit, counsel for Justice Hasnat Ahmed Khan and Justice Shahbar Raza Rizvi, asked, “Why only the judges, who had taken oath under PCO, and not the Army Generals were actually involved in the November 3, 2007 unconstitutional step, were not served contempt of court notices.
Justice Jawwad S Khawaja said, “They would also be called if need arises.”
Basit argued that people would that the decision by this bench would reflect bias against the PCO judges. But Justice Shahid stated, “Not people but you are saying it.”
Justice Jawwad asked the counsel to tell out of 17 members of the Supreme Court, whom you trust and was not part of the movement for the restoration of judges.
Justice Shahid said that usurper and those who had violated the Constitution were right but those who had followed the Constitution and refused to take oath under PCO are wrong. He said on July 31 the issue of PCO judges was decided.
Justice (Retd) Abdul Hameed Dogar voiced concern over Justice Tariq Pervaiz and Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, saying that they have taken oath from him, while Justice Rahim has sought the recusal of Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui, Justice Jawwad S Khawaja and Justice Tariq Parvez. Justice (retd) Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry and Justice Hamid Ali Shah have also objected to judges of four-member bench.
Justice Jawwad said that both the bench and bar not only have to save the dignity and honour of this court, but also have to enhance it. He asked Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh, counsel for Justice Hamid Ali Shah, to provide all the documents that you have mentioned in the application.
Khalid Ranjha, counsel for Justice (Retd) Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry, said that itÂ’s not enough that justice is done, but it should be seen as well. He said in the interest of the justice and fair play, the judges against whom objections have been raised should recuse themselves, so that requirements of Article 10A of Constitution are fully met, which is now a fundamental rights guaranteed to a citizen.
The proceedings for contempt of court notice against the PCO judges initially started on May 10, 2010 and since then three judges – Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk, Justice Raja Fayyaz and Justice Said Mohammad Ali have recused themselves from hearing the PCO judges case.
The court is hearing the cases of Justice (Retd) Abdul Hameed Dogar, former Chief Justice of Supreme Court, Justice (Retd) Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry, former Chief Justice of Lahore High Court; and eight sitting judges – Justice Sayed Zahid Hussain of the Supreme Court and Justice Khurshid Anwar Bhinder, Justice Hamid Ali Shah, Justice Zafar Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Hasnat Ahmed Khan, Justice Syed Shabbar Raza Rizvi, Justice Yasmin Abbasey and Justice Jehan Zaib Rahim of different high courts.
The PCO judges were facing contempt charges for taking oath under the Provisional Constitution Order (PCO) in defiance of a restraining order issued by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench on November 3, 2007, moments after the proclamation of emergency by former president Pervez Musharraf.

Lohans Back In Court Over Child Support

Lindsay Lohan is back home in her native Long Island for the holidays, thanks to a furlough pass from the Betty Ford Clinic, but it’ll be anything but “Peace on Earth” at Casa de Lohan this Christmas. The Lohan Family Feud rages on as Lindsay’s warring parents, Dina and Michael, fight over back child support [...]

Radia tapes: Supreme Court to hear Tata”s plea today

The Supreme Court will on Monday hear Tata Group chairman Ratan Tata”s petition seeking an investigation into the leakage of tapes containing his private conversation with corporate lobbyist Nira Radia. The petitioner has also sought a stay on any further publication of the leaked conversations. In his petition, Tata also sought action against those involved [...]

Pak spy agencies admit having Adiala Jail’s “missing prisoners” in their custody

PakistanafmapThe mystery of eleven missing prisoners of Adiala Jail has finally been solved, as Pakistan’s top intelligence agencies have confessed before the Supreme Court that the terror accused are in their custody, and are being tried under the Army Act. During the course of the court proceedings, Raja Muhammad Irshad, counsel for the federation, the [...]

Spy agencies admit custody


ISLAMABAD – The intelligence agencies of the country on Thursday conceded that 11 prisoners of Adiala Jail were safe and alive in their custody and they would be dealt with laws under Army Act.
A three-member bench of the apex court comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Ghulam Rabbani and Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday was hearing the case of Adiala Jail prisoners who went missing after their release.
The court had issued notices to the heads of secret agencies seeking their explanation with regard to 11 missing prisoners, allegedly abducted by them. In the hearing on November 24, 2010, Attorney General of Pakistan Maulvi Anwarul Haq on behalf of the agencies had informed the court that he had approached the concerned authorities but they had denied having any information about the whereabouts of these missing prisoners.
The AGP also stated that the spymasters could not be made respondents in the constitutional petitions.
The Attorney General, however, had withdrawn the reply that the secret agencies were enjoying immunity and could not be made respondents in any case, after the court had expressed severe dismay over the reply.
Muhammad Irshad, counsel for Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), and Military Intelligence (MI) on Thursday, told the Supreme Court the impression created that Army, ISI and other agencies were above the Constitution was wrong.
He made a loud and clear verbal statement on behalf of ISI and MI and promised to submit the written statement today (Friday). He stated that Pakistan Army, ISI and any other agencies were subject to the Constitution and held the Supreme Court of Pakistan in high regard. But there are certain elements, which wanted to create misperception by saying that the Army and ISI are above the Constitution, he added.
This impression is not right, as the ISI and other agencies are bound to follow orders and judgments of the Supreme Court and they respect and appreciate the apex courtÂ’s steps, which it is taking for the supremacy of law and order and good governance.
Irshad said 11 persons, who were detained in Adiala Jail, after their release voluntarily surrendered themselves to the persons disguised as agency officials, who had taken them to their operational areas and kept them in the terrorist hideouts in order to carry out further terrorist activities across the country.
The agencies on the order of the Supreme Court and the notices issued to them by the court penetrated into the terroristsÂ’ operational areas and launched a massive operation and recovered more than 20 persons including 11 prisoners of Adiala Jail. They have interrogated them and it was found that the prisoners have deep links with the terrorists, operating in the different areas, causing serious damages in the country and killing army personnel, including three serving Army Generals and also damaging the military and defence installations. Therefore, they are no longer missing persons as they were in the custody of law enforcement agencies and being dealt with the law under Army Act and would face field court marshal.
Arshad said that the officials who had sleeplessness nights for the defence of the people and the country were being humiliated, while in India no one make statements against RAW.
The Chief Justice in response to that said: “We appreciate the Army, ISI and other agencies as they were defending the country and we also have all love and affection for them.” The CJP asked the counsel for Federation, ISI, MI and IB to submit the written statement, however he promised to file it today (Friday). The court then adjourned the hearing till today (Friday).
It is relevant to mention here that the jail authorities had allegedly handed over 11 persons to agencies- who were acquitted due to lack of evidence regarding their involvement in five cases including attack on plane of Gen (Retd) Pervez Musharraf, attacks on Kamra and Hamza Camps and General Headquarters (GHQ).
The Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) had acquitted Syed Arab, Gulraiz, Hussainullah Jan and Abdul Rashid allegedly involved in Kamra suicide attack on April 28. The same court also acquitted Dr Muhammad Niaz, Shafiqur Rehman, Abdul Majid, Mazharul Haq, Abdul Saboor, Muhammad Aamir and Abdul Basit on May 8 in Hamza Camp and GHQ attacks cases.
Besides their release from the jail, DCO Imdadullah Bosal passed an order and subsequently on the expiry of that order another order was issued by the then home secretary Nadeem Hassan Asif.
Both the orders were challenged in the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, which had declared the orders as unlawful and beyond the jurisdiction. The LHC also issued an order for the registration of criminal cases against the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent of Adiala Jail for not releasing the prisoners.
The Special BranchÂ’s daily situation report (DSR) presented before the court by the Punjab Chief Secretary in which stated that these prisoners were picked up by the secret agencies from Adiala Jail.
It may be mentioned here that Attorney General of Pakistan, Maulvi Anwarul Haq was not present in the court.

Hague grants Haradinaj temporary release

The Hague Tribunal has granted Ramush Haradinaj temporary release from detention over the winter court recess, from Dec. 17 until Friday Jan. 14. A similar request, however, was denied to his former fellow KLA member Lahi Brahimaj, the court said.

WikiLeaks founder is detained by UK court

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange remains behind bars this morning after being refused bail at a London court over allegations of sex crimes in Sweden.
The 39-year-old will remain there until a fresh hearing on December 14.

WikiLeaks founder refused bail by UK court

WikiLeaks founder and editor-in-chief Julian Assange has been refused bail by a London court and will be remanded in custody until Dec. 14. This came after the Australian turned himself in at a police station this morning.

Verdict for crimes against Serbs in Bosnia quashed

The Supreme Court of Norway has quashed Mirsad Repak’s verdict in the case of war crimes against Serbs in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1992.

The Norwegian law for this kind of crime cannot be applied retroactively, the court explained.

St. James Holdings, Food Republic in JV to set up outdoor food court

St. James Holdings says unit Bar Street, has entered into a joint venture with Food Republic to operate a food court selling food and non-alcoholic drinks at the outdoor car park next to St. James Power Station. Bar Street and Food Republic will each hold 50% of equity interest in the JV company and will each provide a sum of $600,000 as interest-free shareholder loans to the JV company.

{jcomments on}

2G scam: Supreme Court to take up Ratan Tata”s petition

Ratan TataThe Supreme Court will on Thursday take up a petition filed by Tata Group Chairman Ratan Tata that seek a direction to be given to the government to probe the leakage of tapes containing his private conversation with corporate lobbyist Nira Radia. The petition is listed for mentioning before a two-judge bench comprising Justices G [...]

Neve Campbell Divorce

It’s all over for Scream actress Neve Campbell and her longtime beau John Light. The pair are divorcing after three years of marriage. It was Neve who petitioned the court seeking the split last June, insiders say. According to documents filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court nearly six months ago, Campbell cited “irreconcilable differences” [...]

Wife of Ratko Mladić to face court

The wife of former Bosnian Serb military leader and Hague fugitive Ratko Mladić will face a court in Belgrade on Friday. Bosiljka Mladić has been charged with illegal possession of weapons, and could be sent to prison from one to ten years if found guilty.

Microsoft Appeal in i4i Case Gets Supreme Court Hearing

Microsoft will have its appeal in a long-running patent-infringement case with Canadian firm i4i heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. – The U.S. Supreme Court will hear Microsoft’s appeal in its long-running
patent case with Canadian firm i4i. That decision not only gives Microsoft yet
another shot at overturning a substantial monetary judgment, but gives the Supreme
Court a chance to leave its mark on the escalating patent-infri…


Delhi court to decide on sedition charge against Roy, Geelani

A Delhi metropolitan magistrate’s court is likely to decide Saturday whether criminal proceedings should initiated against hard line Hurriyat leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani and writer-activist Arundhati Roy on charges of sedition for their alleged anti-India statements. Metropolitan Magistrate Navita Kumari Bagha, who pulled up the police for failing to submit proper status report on [...]

Swedish Appeals Court Upholds Pirate Bay Convictions

An appeals court upholds the convictions of three founders of The Pirate Bay Website for violating copyright laws. – A Swedish appeals court today upheld the convictions of three founders
of The Pirate Bay Website who have been accused of violating
copyright laws, according to reports.
The popular file-sharing site has been at the center of legal
controversy for years. While the site remains
in operation, …


Apex court declines stay


ISLAMABAD – The Federation on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that no agreement for mining had been signed yet, as the grant of mining rights, apart from oil and gas and radioactive substance, was under the 1973 Constitution a provincial matter.
Deputy Attorney General Chaudhry Mazhar on behalf of the Federal Government, while Advocate General Balochistan Mengal filed para-wise comments on behalf of the Government of Balochistan.
Advocate Supreme Court Tariq Asad has filed the petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, saying that awarding contract of gold mines to foreign companies was tantamount to treason.
Barrister Zafarullah, Advocate Supreme Court, on Wednesday also filed identical petition and urged the court to issue stay order against the agreement, as Wednesday (November 24, 2010) was the last day to enter into the agreement with the foreign company – Tethyan Copper Company Pakistan (TCCP) – for the exploration of copper and gold at Reko Diq. However, the Deputy Attorney said, “No agreement has been signed yet.”
The Federation in its written reply submitted that no sale and purchase transaction of the mineral resources took place on behalf of the Government of Pakistan (GoP) or Government of Balochistan (GoB), saying according to the Balochistan Mineral Rules 2002 (BMC Rules 2002), only the GoB is entitled to royalty and certain other provincial levies, where the GoP is entitled to receive the federal taxes, Workers Welfare Fund contribution, excise duty and custom duty. The Balochistan government in Reko Diq project was also entitled to receive 25 per cent share from the profits of the mining of the copper and gold without making any exploration investment.
The Federal Government denied that it had pressurised the provincial government in Reko Diq project for any wrongful action against the interests of the people of Balochistan. The Federal Government entered into the affairs of Reko Diq when a delegation of TCCP called on the Prime Minister of Pakistan in July 2007 and presented Draft Mineral Agreement (DMA) to be signed among GoP, GoB and TCCP. The then PM constituted a steering committee comprising representatives of GoP and GoB to coordinate inputs and finalise recommendations for approval of DMA, expeditious processing and finalisation of the DMA with the company and appointment of quality advisor/consultants for evaluation and negotiation of DMA to safeguard the interests of both the federal and provincial governments.
The Steering Committee held its meetings in February 2008 and January 2009 and jointly prepared counter-proposals on fiscal, regulatory, corporate sector, management, amendment in 2002 BMC Rules, mineral title, consents and incentives, infrastructure, termination, dispute resolution mechanism, federal taxes and levies and rate of royalties.
The Federation said that the petition was based exclusively on the article, appeared in an English daily, without any supporting evidence and that the petitioner prima facie lacked knowledge of the rules and policy on the subject and had portrayed a false picture, and that the petitioner had not made TCCP a respondent, when it was evident that TCCP was a necessary party.
The mineral exploration is a high-risk business requiring massive capital investment and a long gestation period. The foreign investors have proved the resource potential of copper and gold at Reko Diq, which in itself is a significant achievement, after years of work and with an investment of over US $500 million as claimed by TCCP.
The investment made by TCCP will generate substantial revenues for GoP and GoB, besides providing mass scale employment of about 6,500 skilled and unskilled workers, transfer of technology promotion of downstream industries, and establishment of new township in the region and will place the country on the world mineral map.
The statement mentioned that all the proceedings regarding the Reko Diq copper-gold project both at federal and provincial levels were fairly transparent and no violation of rules/policy had been committed at any stage.
During the proceeding, Fakhar-ud-Din, counsel for TCCP, requested the court to club all the cases and hear them together and decide the matter soon. He said that the Balochistan High Court in 2007 dismissed the petitions of Maulana Abdul Haq Baloch, ex-MNA, and two others. Maulana had filed the petition against BHC which had been pending for the last three years. The learned counsel also requested the court to stop English daily from publishing articles and stories on Reko Diq as the matter is sub judice. But the Chief Justice said that they could not pass any order in this regard.
Barrister Zafarullah in his petition prayed that the court should order that no deal should be signed until the report of the independent commission was available and Pakistan was assured of its due share.
The court has issued fresh notice to the respondents and adjourned the case till December 15, 2010.
APP adds: The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to grant stay order on awarding of contract for exploration of Reko Diq mines in Balochistan and put off hearing till December 15.
The bench observed since both high government officials had been giving statements over the issue, so it would be premature to grant stay.
Asad requested the court for the whole record of the deal/agreement, if any, with respect to the sale of gold and copper mines to the TCC or any other foreign companies, as well as lease, from the respondents.
Besides, a direction was sought for respondents to refrain from issuing the licence of mining in an arbitrary and unlawful manner and without the consultation of the parliament and the Balochistan government.
He further requested that respondents be asked to explain as to why the mining process could not have ever been carried out by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources and mining department.
The petitioner questioned the selling of gold mines worth $260 billion (rather due to the rise of the prices of gold and copper, the total yield could be even $500 billion or may be a trillion dollars) to the foreign companies at a very low price.