RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘David Miliband’

James Purnell on life after cabinet

In his first interview since resignation, ex-minister on New Labour’s failings – and the challenge ahead

On Thursday morning in a cafe by the Thames near Tower Bridge, James Purnell can see wild flowers with big purple heads, fronds of water reeds and roller-skating children on school holiday – a Kodak moment that encapsulates why he’ll probably never stand to be leader of the Labour party.

This is his “walk in the park” test. Can the leader of a political party go for a walk in the park, or a bike ride on Sunday, and not be trailed by special branch? Purnell’s observations of his political mentor, Tony Blair, led him to conclude no.

“I don’t miss TV interviews,” Purnell says of his previous life, leaning back in his chair. “I don’t miss doing the Today programme, with great respect. Not having a weekend, I don’t miss. I love having a weekend. I love not having a red box hanging over me.”

Five weeks out of frontline politics appear to have done him good. His sideburns seem in rude health. He has a tan and is lightly freckled, and he has traded his ministerial suit for a pair of fashionable indigo jeans.

Speaking for the first time about his reasons for quitting Gordon Brown’s government, Purnell says the person who gave him the best guidance when he decided to resign was an unnamed friend who told him to honest about what he thought. So he was, brutally, telling the prime minister to stand down in his letter to Downing Street.

“They said to me, ‘You can’t go very far wrong with the truth.’”

The former work and pensions secretary had been struggling with the truth since as long ago as December 2008. “Over the last six months I had been thinking: has the elastic stretched beyond where I feel I was being true to myself? I remember doing an interview with Andrew Rawnsley and having to find things to say that were just about true enough and that the letter of what I was saying was true enough. I thought: ‘This is too much – too much of a stress.’ That’s less about politics and more about what I said in my letter [about Brown]. There were policy things. But I’m not going to go there.”

The discomfort turned to decision as late as 11.30am on the Thursday voters were going to the polls. Only the day before, those running Labour’s reshuffle had rung Purnell to ask whether he would like the health or education brief. He opted for education.

But the next day, he says, the 10pm deadline – ministers were under orders to keep quiet until the polls in the European and local elections had closed – concentrated his mind.

Uncomfortable

At 11.30am on a park bench on a former council estate in his constituency he decided to go; at 2.30pm he ducked into his constituency office and wrote the letter in five minutes; at 5pm he told three national newspapers; and at 9.50pm he spoke to Peter Mandelson (“we had a disagreement”).

The other man he spoke to was the foreign secretary, David Miliband, which provoked another disagreement, though one based on a previous shared understanding.

“I think I put him in quite a difficult position by what I did,” Purnell says, leaning away from the Dictaphone and uncomfortable. Why? “Why? Because I raised a question for him which he answered in a different way. People asked why, given I resigned, he didn’t resign.”

Purnell says he and Miliband are extremely close, and that the foreign secretary has been “extraordinarily thoughtful towards me since my resignation. I’ve been amazingly impressed by his thoughtfulness and dedication to maintaining that relationship and he’s done it in a way that is clearly not scarred by the fact of what I did.”

In his time on the backbenches Purnell has set about arranging his thoughts, both literally and metaphorically – it took one weekend to arrange the books in his flat from A to Z (A Class Act, by his former cabinet colleague Lord Adonis, the transport secretary, to Emile Zola).

British government, he says, can be a bit of a “conspiracy against ideas” and he describes his opposite number in New Zealand telling him that her government is run as a kind of “beehive”, with ministers working in the same place and a Thursday evening drink when cabinet members compare notes.

So, as Tony Benn gave up politics to spend more time on politics, Purnell is giving up government to spend more time on policy. In September he’ll begin a three-year project at the Demos thinktank to “reinvent New Labour” for the next generation.

Purnell will not be shying away from the years when the sheen came off the New Labour project (the novel he’s just started happens to be Ian McEwan’s Saturday – 24 hours on the day of the anti-war march that crystallised Blair’s fall from popularity). He says the project that started off as a “broad tent” has now become a “gazebo”.

He says New Labour became “too small-c conservative” on schools policy and didn’t make the case for immigration. It was terrified of swing voters, but should put electoral reform to a referendum at the next election.

“We took the electoral furniture to be too fixed. We didn’t think about creating a new coalition and I think that’s what we need to do now. To be honest I think we were too conservative about our means, so it was easier to take on arguments on the left, not the right. So what I want to try and do now is be as radical on the left as on the right.

“I think we need to go back and clarify values which underlie new Labour and be very candid about what worked and didn’t work.

“If Tony was coming into politics now he would be saying we need to develop a new set of policies for what is relevant for today, not for 1994.”

He admits to nostalgia for that period but it’s a nostalgia like that for Britpop.

The Open Left team at Demos will solicit help from across the left. “We’re going to go through Labour values, match them to what we’ve done and then identify challenges and then organise a team around those challenges.”

Purnell’s critics call him a Tory, some a Blairite, others a Liberal and he agrees he is pretty liberal on social policy (he has been heard to joke that had Brown tried to make him home secretary he’d have told the prime minister he planned to let immigrants in and prisoners out).

But his resignation letter talked about the need for “stronger regulation and an active state”. He agrees the real prize for the next generation of Labour politicians is to weld together liberalism and social democracy.

The white rubber wristband he wears he says he will keep wearing until the UK hits its target to spend 0.7% of GDP on international aid.

“Individuals,” Purnell thinks, “collapse under the weight of their autonomy. It is important, but people don’t want to feel alone – they want to feel protected and they also have a concept of a good society based on compassion for others.”

He suggests that the writings of others at Demos, including his friends Richard Reeves and Phil Collins – which draw heavily on Amartya Sen’s recent writing on capabilities – go some way towards explaining that. But he adds: “I think they leave out the compassion we have towards strangers which is at the root of being an egalitarian.”

Of those alphabetised books, Purnell’s favourite is one called Market Socialism. “It’s not a phrase that is ever going to inspire a political movement but it does capture a lot of what I believe – that markets are a good means to spread power and create innovation but they can be yoked to leftwing goals and not to capitalism. There is a difference between capitalism and markets.

“People on the right are very sceptical about the state but people on the left believe the state is a good thing.”

Advice for Brown in advance of an election? To pledge universal childcare and a guaranteed job for every person out of work after one year.

But his ideas probably won’t be deployed by himself as a leader of the party. “The way I feel at the moment is it’s pretty unlikely I’ll want to go back into frontline politics,” he says.

“I never want to leave politics. I love politics, I love ideas and I was pretty excited by the Department for Work and Pensions but actually I get exactly the same kick, in some ways in a freer way, from the stuff I am doing at Demos.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Purnell: Labour is living in the past

Exclusive: Former cabinet minister says he has no regrets in first major interview since nearly toppling Gordon Brown

Read Purnell’s full interview in the Guardian tomorrow

James Purnell, the former cabinet minister whose resignation almost toppled the prime minister, tells the Guardian today that he is unlikely to ever return to frontline politics and calls on the Labour party to stop the “nostalgic” hankering for the heyday of New Labour in the late 1990s.

In his first major interview since he quit as work and pensions secretary last month, Purnell likens that period in politics to the dynamism and excitement of the music scene generated around Oasis and Blur. “All those Blairite, New Labour labels … for me it’s a bit like Britpop – I feel nostalgic for it, it was absolutely right for its time, but that time was 1994.”

Purnell was one of the most senior ministers of the 11 who walked out of Brown’s government last month and the only one to directly call on the prime minister to stand down. In his resignation letter, Purnell told the prime minister: “I now believe your continued leadership makes a Conservative victory more, not less likely.”

In his exclusive interview with the Guardian, which will run in full in tomorrow’s paper, the former Downing Street adviser to Tony Blair talks about his career spanning nearly 20 years in politics.

On Monday, Purnell will launch a three-year project at the thinktank Demos on the future of the Labour party, called Open Left. It will include contributions from the respected leftwing backbenchers Jon Cruddas and Alan Simpson.

Rasing doubts about the government track record over 12 years on schools, immigration policy and electoral reform, Purnell says he wants to “try and be as radical on the left as on the right”.

He showers praise on the foreign secretary, David Miliband, and explains the circumstances surrounding his decision to resign from Brown’s government on 6 June as polls closed in council and European elections.

“The moment when it became a really simple decision to take was when I stopped worrying about what exactly would be the consequences of different things and when I realised I just had to be true to myself. I couldn’t go on the telly the following morning and say something I couldn’t believe.”

Describing life after government, he says: “The thing I worked out is that I really loved policy and I love leading an organisation like DWP. Politics, I don’t miss as much. Journalists, I don’t miss as much.

“I love having a weekend. I love not having a red box hanging over me all weekend.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


UK revokes licences for Israeli navy guns

Exports of spare parts halted in response to Gaza Strip attacks in December-January

Britain has revoked export licences for weapons on Israeli navy missile boats because of their use during the offensive against the Gaza Strip.

The licences apparently covered spare parts for guns on the Sa’ar 4.5 ships, which reportedly fired missiles and artillery shells into the Palestinian coastal territory during the three-week war, which started in late December.

Israel’s foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, shrugged off what he called one of “many embargoes”. The foreign office in London insisted the rare move did not constitute an embargo but was the application of normal UK and EU export licensing criteria. Still, it linked the decision directly to Operation Cast Lead – the Israeli codename for the attacks – and described it as similar to action taken against Russia and Georgia after their conflict last year.

A spokesman for Amnesty International, citing the “weight of evidence” that Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza, said: “It’s a step forward but it doesn’t go nearly far enough.”

Israel’s defence ministry made no comment but Lieberman told state radio: “We’ve had many embargoes in the past. This shouldn’t bother us.”

Israel gets the bulk of its military requirements from the US, more than 95% according to some estimates. The UK accounts for less than 1% or about £30m worth of exports a year.

The decision came after a review of UK defence exports to Israel announced in April by David Miliband, the foreign secretary. Israel’s London embassy ascribed the revocation of the licences to pressure from MPs and human rights organisations, the Ha’aretz newspaper reported.

Israeli officials confirmed the UK had reviewed 182 export licences, including 35 for exports to the navy. It decided to cancel five, all relating to spare parts for Sa’ar weapons. The arms involved include anti-ship and surface-to-air missiles, cannons and heavy machine guns.

Israel launched its Gaza attack after the expiry of a ceasefire put in place to halt the firing of missiles into Israel, and as part of a strategy to weaken the Islamist movement Hamas. More than 1,400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis were killed.

Ha’aretz said the British decision was not expected to have any impact on the navy’s operational capability. But it added: “It has great political significance and could encourage other countries to halt defence exports to Israel. The country considered most likely to be next is Belgium, which sells Israel equipment used to disperse demonstrations.”

Amnesty had previously highlighted Britain’s role in supplying engines for Hermes drone aircraft. In another report this month, it detailed how Israeli forces killed hundreds of unarmed Palestinian civilians and destroyed thousands of homes in attacks that breached the laws of war.

“Amnesty has uncovered evidence of war crimes committed by both sides in the conflict,” it said. “We are calling on all countries to suspend all transfers of military equipment, assistance and munitions, to Israel, Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups until there is no longer a substantial risk that it will be used for serious violations of human rights.

“We will also be monitoring closely to ensure that the UK does not renege on its promises. In the past we have seen a tightening of restrictions against Israel in the wake of a major offensive, only for them to be loosened again once the issue falls out of the public eye.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Cameron: helicopter deficit is scandal

Conservative leader’s comments come as poll reveals backing for British involvement in war has grown

David Cameron today said it was a “scandal” that the British army did not have enough helicopters to transport troops around Afghanistan.

Speaking as a new poll suggested that the growing British casualty rate had not increased public hostility to the conflict, the Conservative leader said the government should deal with the helicopter problem “as a matter of urgency”.

Cameron will have the chance to challenge Gordon Brown on the issue when the prime minister makes a statement to the Commons, which will cover the latest deaths in Afghanistan, later today.

In a speech on international aid today, the Tory leader said the government should supply British troops with more equipment.

“Of course we must do that – it is a scandal in particular that they still lack enough helicopters to move around in Afghanistan,” he added.

“The government must deal with that issue as a matter of extreme urgency.”

Research carried out as news broke of the deaths of eight soldiers in 24 hours – taking the British death toll in Afghanistan to more than that in Iraq – revealed support for the war remained firm and backing for British involvement had grown.

The poll of 1,000 showed that people appear reluctant to turn against a conflict while soldiers are fighting and dying on the front line, and the increasingly high-profile nature of the war appears to have strengthened public backing.

Opposition to the war, at 47%, is just ahead of support, at 46%, according to the ICM poll for the Guardian and the BBC’s Newsnight.

Backing for Britain’s role in the conflict has grown since the last time an ICM poll was conducted on the subject in 2006.

It is up 15 points from 31%, while opposition has fallen over the same period by six points from 53%.

The poll also showed that 42% are in favour of the immediate withdrawal of British troops, and a further 14% want them home by the end of the year. These figures are almost identical to the results in 2006.

A further 36% want troops to stay as long as they are needed – again a similar proportion to 2006, when British casualties were lower.

The findings came as ministers drew up plans to devote more troops and resources to Afghanistan after dismissing repeated requests from defence chiefs for reinforcements.

The shift in approach follows the rising death toll, outspoken criticism from opposition politicians and the prospect of a long period of intense fighting against the Taliban.

Gordon Brown will today confirm that the number of British troops is increasing to 9,000 from a base of 8,300.

One favoured option, which has not been agreed, is for the number of troops to be kept at 9,000 after the next general election.

Today, Miliband told GMTV the government’s strategy in Afghanistan was clear.

“This is a mission that’s been developed with a very clear strategy: above all, to make us safer here because we know these areas of Afghanistan and its neighbour Pakistan are used to launch terrorism around the world,” he said. “So the mission for us is clear.”

Miliband admitted there had been a “terrible casualty toll” and paid tribute to those who were killed, but added that more helicopters alone were not the answer.

John Maples, the Tory deputy chairman, yesterday told the Guardian: “Increasingly, people are starting to ask whether this war is winnable and whether our military objectives are sensible given the number of troops and the amount of equipment we are prepared to commit.”

Lord Ashdown, the former Liberal Democrat leader who almost became the UN special representative in Afghanistan last year, was scathing about British and US conduct.

“The army were persuaded, for political reasons, to follow a Beau Geste strategy – putting our people out in forward forts largely because the politicians were persuaded by [Afghan president Hamid] Karzai that this was where his supporters and family lived,” he said.

“It led to a military error of major proportions. The army’s job in a war is to find and kill the enemy.”

After previously blocking requests by the chiefs of staff for 2,000 more troops to be deployed in southern Afghanistan, Brown has said in a letter to senior Commons committee chairmen: “We will of course continue to review our force levels based on the advice of commanders and discussions with our allies.”

The Treasury has previously blocked the defence chiefs’ request on the grounds of cost.

However, the chancellor, Alistair Darling, said over the weekend: “If [British troops] need equipment, whatever it is, to support them in the frontline then of course the government, through the Treasury, is ready to help.”

He told the BBC: “You can’t send troops into the frontline and not be prepared to see it through in terms of the … resources they need.”

Significantly, given the government’s past decisions to cap resources for Afghanistan, Darling added: “You’ve got to listen to what the chiefs of staff tell us.”

Commanders on the ground have made no secret of the fact that they want more helicopters and more British troops.

General Sir Richard Dannatt, the head of the army, was yesterday reported to have told a private dinner of MPs that too few troops and helicopters were available.

In an interview with the British Forces Broadcasting Service on Saturday, Brown paid tribute to the “sacrifice” of the 15 troops who have died since the start of the month in the bloodiest fighting Britain has seen in the Afghan campaign.

“I know that this has been a difficult summer – it is going to be a difficult summer,” he said.

The prime minister said he had been assured, in a lengthy briefing by commanders, that Operation Panther’s Claw to drive the Taliban from central Helmand province was making “considerable progress”.

Bob Ainsworth, the defence secretary, said troops were “attacking the Taliban in one of their heartland areas”.

“The reason they are standing and fighting is they know that what we are doing potentially hurts them seriously and strategically,” he said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


UK sticks by Afghan op despite losses

UK troops in Afghanistan

Foreign Secretary David Miliband has defended the UK’s continued military presence in Afghanistan, after eight troops were killed in 24 hours.

Some 184 troops have died there since 2001, more than the 179 killed in Iraq.

With Britain’s role being called into question, Mr Miliband said UK forces were stopping Afghanistan becoming "a launch pad for attacks" by terrorists.

He said safety at home needed security in Afghanistan. "This is about the future of Britain," he added.

The UK Chief of Defence Staff, Sir Jock Stirrup, insisted "real governance" was emerging in Afghanistan.

See a map of the conflict zone

He said Britain had "taken some very sad casualties over the last several days" and warned of more deaths to come but insisted the Taliban were "losing" in Afghanistan.

"It’s very clear to everyone who has visited Helmand in particular over the last three years that, where we provide the necessary degree of security for its citizens, real governance is starting to emerge," he added.

BBC defence and security correspondent Rob Watson

When British troops were first deployed to southern Afghanistan three years ago the then defence secretary expressed the hope that they would complete their mission without a shot being fired.

It has instead been the most high intensity fighting British troops have faced since the Korean War in the 1950s.

To critics, the ferocity of the fighting is proof of how ill thought out the whole mission has been all along.

Defenders of the operation, however, say it was always bound to be difficult and that the casualties while regrettable have been suffered in a worthwhile and winnable cause.

Certainly the deployment to Afghanistan of around 10% of Britain’s army has proved a real strain on manpower, equipment and finances.

For now at least though, Britain remains firmly committed to staying the course.

Rob Watson

Fifteen soldiers have died in 10 days in southern Afghanistan.

Five from the 2nd Battalion The Rifles were killed in two separate blasts while on foot patrol near Sangin, Helmand province, on Friday.

Hours earlier, it had been confirmed a British soldier from the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment died near Nad Ali in Helmand.

Two soldiers died on Thursday evening. One, from 4th Battalion The Rifles, was killed in a blast while on foot patrol near Nad Ali.

The second, from Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment, attached to 1st Battalion Welsh Guards, was killed during an engagement with insurgent forces near Lashkar Gah.

It has brought the UK’s role in the conflict under increased scrutiny.

However, Mr Miliband told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme troops were there to "ensure that Afghanistan can not again become an incubator for terrorism and a launching pad for attacks on us".

"This is about the future of Britain because we know that the borderlands of Afghanistan and Pakistan have been used to launch terrible attacks, not just on the US but on Britain as well," he added.

Helicopter call

The mission would not be over until the 65,000-strong Afghan security forces had been bolstered to the 120,000 needed to defend the nation, he said.

FROM THE TODAY PROGRAMME

More from Today programme

The recent casualties coincided with UK troops’ involvement in Operation Panchai Palang, or Panther’s Claw, a major assault against the Taliban in Helmand ahead of next month’s Afghan elections.

They have been joined by about 4,000 US and 650 Afghan troops for the mission.

Mr Miliband defended claims by Conservative leader David Cameron that those fighting on the front line were not properly equipped – particularly with helicopters.

The foreign secretary said the government had spent £10bn on equipment for force protection – including 1,200 new vehicles – in the last five years.

"Protection of people there is the highest priority for the government," he added.

HAVE YOUR SAY

"The British soldiers must suspend all activities in Afghanistan and come home"

Kenneth, London

Send us your comments

Mr Cameron had praised the bravery of British troops as "outstanding" but had called on the government to explain its strategy and deliver key equipment.

"It is a scandal that our forces still lack the helicopters they desperately require to move around in Helmand," he said.

"Promises of more helicopters in the future are not enough. More helicopters are needed today. More helicopters would save lives."

Map of conflict zone

Return to top
</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Speedos and other misjudgments

With his unerring knack of getting the wrong end of the stick, the foreign secretary, David Miliband, dismissed the weekend’s revelations of the new head of MI6, Sir John Sawers, prancing around on his wife’s Facebook page with a curt, “It’s not a state secret that he wears Speedo swimming trunks, for goodness sake.”

Agreed, Dave. But then no one was saying it was. The issue is Sawers’ judgment. How come he’s the only person in the world to realise that if you’re going to pose in a pair of swimmers that bear an uncanny resemblance to those worn by James Bond in Casino Royale, then you have to have a bod as buff as Daniel Craig?

It’s not just the new C, as the spy boss is by tradition known, who is embarrassed by the saggy pecs and the unattractive bleached gut, it’s the whole country. When Vladimir Putin – the former head of the KGB and Russian president – goes topless, he makes sure he looks likes he’s bulked up on steroids. Our top spy is the wimp who gets sand kicked in his face.

Now there’s nothing wrong with being a wimp. George Smiley was a wimp and we all loved him so much he’s just had a retrospective on Radio 4. But George would have instinctively known that some people are better off maintaining their cover.

Prince William did a slightly better job of going incognito with his choice of leathers while riding his Ducati to a polo game. He wasn’t quite Bond, who would have been head-to-toe in unbranded black, but with his spotless suit he could have been any other weekend biker. Apart from the giveaway customised Cross of St George kneepads, that is. He might as well have gone the whole Eurotrash hog and had his coat of arms and initials embroidered on the suit.

Much like Roger Federer, the embodiment of Swiss Eurotrash. Sublime tennis player, great champion and all that, but did he really have to accept the Wimbledon trophy in a jacket with “15″ embroidered on the back and “RF” on the front? It’s not the chutzpah in having had a jacket made to mark your 15th grand slam title and stashing it in your bag just in case, it’s having the bad taste to wear it at all.

Federer’s people laughed it off by saying it was something Nike had knocked up for him. Roger, you’re a big boy now. You’ve got loads of dosh, so next year tell Nike to sod off and dream up their own publicity stunts without you.

Still, at least Federer has a sponsorship deal. I wouldn’t be waiting by the phone for a call from Speedo if I was you, C.

• This article was amended on Tuesday 7 July 2009. We originally misspelt Sir John Sawers’ surname as ‘Sawyer’ in the article above. This has been amended.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Speedos and other misjudgments

With his unerring knack of getting the wrong end of the stick, the foreign secretary, David Miliband, dismissed the weekend’s revelations of the new head of MI6, Sir John Sawyer, prancing around on his wife’s Facebook page with a curt, “It’s not a state secret that he wears Speedo swimming trunks, for goodness sake.”

Agreed, Dave. But then no one was saying it was. The issue is Sawyer’s judgment. How come he’s the only person in the world to realise that if you’re going to pose in a pair of swimmers that bear an uncanny resemblance to those worn by James Bond in Casino Royale, then you have to have a bod as buff as Daniel Craig?

It’s not just the new C, as the spy boss is by tradition known, who is embarrassed by the saggy pecs and the unattractive bleached gut, it’s the whole country. When Vladimir Putin – the former head of the KGB and Russian president – goes topless, he makes sure he looks likes he’s bulked up on steroids. Our top spy is the wimp who gets sand kicked in his face.

Now there’s nothing wrong with being a wimp. George Smiley was a wimp and we all loved him so much he’s just had a retrospective on Radio 4. But George would have instinctively known that some people are better off maintaining their cover.

Prince William did a slightly better job of going incognito with his choice of leathers while riding his Ducati to a polo game. He wasn’t quite Bond, who would have been head-to-toe in unbranded black, but with his spotless suit he could have been any other weekend biker. Apart from the giveaway customised Cross of St George kneepads, that is. He might as well have gone the whole Eurotrash hog and had his coat of arms and initials embroidered on the suit.

Much like Roger Federer, the embodiment of Swiss Eurotrash. Sublime tennis player, great champion and all that, but did he really have to accept the Wimbledon trophy in a jacket with “15″ embroidered on the back and “RF” on the front? It’s not the chutzpah in having had a jacket made to mark your 15th grand slam title and stashing it in your bag just in case, it’s having the bad taste to wear it at all.

Federer’s people laughed it off by saying it was something Nike had knocked up for him. Roger, you’re a big boy now. You’ve got loads of dosh, so next year tell Nike to sod off and dream up their own publicity stunts without you.

Still, at least Federer has a sponsorship deal. I wouldn’t be waiting by the phone for a call from Speedo if I was you, C.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Facebook page exposed MI6 head

• Page removed as Miliband plays down security lapse
• Children, pets and swimwear revealed

It was just the usual sort of stuff that gets posted on Facebook: embarrassing family photographs, humdrum details of home life and a few congratulatory messages from relatives and friends on that promotion to the top job. Nothing to get excited about – unless the top job in question happens to be as the director of Britain’s secret intelligence agency, MI6. And the man pictured in the questionable swimwear happens to be the next C himself.

Sir John Sawers, who takes up the post in November, found himself at the centre of the embarrassing security row after it was revealed that his wife, Shelley, had posted the sort of information that MI6 operatives are supposed to keep under wraps on her Facebook page. As well as the photos, she had posted details about their children and the location of the flat the couple use in London.

She had not taken advantage of Facebook’s privacy settings, so all the information was available to any of the 200 million users in the open-access London network, as well as being searchable on Google.

The foreign secretary, David Miliband, played down the seriousness of the affair.

The Mail on Sunday had claimed its story – which also revealed that Shelley Sawers’s half-brother is a researcher for the Holocaust-denying historian David Irving – showed that Sawers had left himself open to a potentially catastrophic security failure. Miliband, however, disagreed. Deploying some distinctly undiplomatic sarcasm, the foreign secretary told BBC1′s Andrew Marr Show: “You [are] leading the news with … the fact that there’s a picture that the head of the MI6 goes swimming. Wow, that really is exciting. It is not a state secret that he wears Speedo swimming trunks, for goodness’ sake let’s grow up.”

The offending page was swiftly removed and the Foreign Office refused to comment on the matter, saying it had nothing to add.

However, Whitehall officials said it was a potentially serious security breach and official security procedures had either been ignored or not been properly passed on to the family. The D notice committee regularly asks journalists not to publish family details or addresses of officials in the security and intelligence agencies.

Sawers is currently the UK ambassador to the UN in New York. Although he has been close to No 10 and the foreign policy establishment for a long time, it is still highly unusual for a diplomat to be chosen as the head – or C, for chief, as he is officially called – of MI6. Whitehall officials suggested that one of the problems was the difficult transition Sawers was making, from being a public figure to becoming the head of MI6.

The Conservative MP Patrick Mercer, who chairs the counter-terrorism sub-committee, said the mistake had left the Sawers family “extremely vulnerable”. Referring to Miliband’s suggestion that the incident was not significant, Mercer said: “If that is the case why has the site being taken down?” He also pointed out that military chiefs had warned that the Taliban get 80% of their intelligence from Twitter and Facebook.

The Liberal Democrats, meanwhile, called for an inquiry into whether Sawers should still be allowed to accept the job.

“Normally, I would welcome greater openness in government for officials or politicians but this type of exposure verges on the reckless,” said the Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesman, Edward Davy. “The prime minister should immediately commission an internal inquiry as to whether this has breached the security of the incoming head of MI6 too seriously to allow him to take up the post.”

In the past year, Shelley Sawers has posted on topics from family parties and holidays to the health of their pets. On 16 June, the day Sawers’s appointment was announced, she posted 19 pictures of the couple on holiday in the West Country. Her Facebook friends also used the account to send messages to her husband about his new job. One relative wrote: “Congrats on the new job, already dubbed Sir Uncle ‘C’ by nephews in the know!”

Stripy trunks and thespian friends – what Lady Shelley Sawers’ Facebook page revealed:

• Sir John wears stripy blue swimming trunks and is apparently partial to a game of beach frisbee

• Lady Sawers and her daughter, Corinne, are big fans of the Bob Fosse-directed 1972 film Cabaret.

One of the pictures posted on the Facebook shows mother and daughter apparently imagining themselves in Weimar Germany and balancing on two golden chairs just like Liza Minnelli when she played Sally Bowles.

It also reveals an intriguing and extremely colourful parrot ornament perched on a table.

• The couple have thespian friends: one picture shows Moir Leslie, who played vicar Janet Fisher in the BBC Radio 4 farming drama The Archers, walking along a beach talking to Alister Cameron, a character actor who has appeared in ITV dramas The Bill and Footballers’ Wives.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Fake Miliband duo call it quits on Twitter

A pair of recent university graduates were behind the fake Twitter account of foreign secretary David Miliband and say it highlights the importance of verification on the internet

The world now has one less Twitter account satirising a politician. After duping the international press, two recent university graduates have decided to stop updating the fake account of British foreign secretary David Miliband.

Several newspapers, including The Guardian, incorrectly reported that David Miliband posted a heartfelt tribute to Michael Jackson on his Twitter account following the pop star’s death. The tribute was not posted by Miliband but rather by 23-year-old Rory Crew and 22-year-old Knud Noelle.

They created the account in January to bring political comedy to Twitter, Crew said. They wanted to pick someone well known but realised thought Gordon Brown was too obvious. “No one would have believed it,” he said.

They respect Miliband but they also believed that “he would be the perfect politician to parody,” Crew said.

They settled on him because while Miliband is frequently quoted in the press there is little if any reporting on his personal life or thoughts. No one would have the information to contradict their satirical snippets on Twitter.

They checked the FCO website regularly so that they could keep up with his schedule, and if they were lacking in inspriration, they checked his occasional blog posts for ideas.

While some of the tweets were clearly ridiculous and his constituency paper, the Shields Gazette, described them as “increasingly bizarre”, some FCO staff thought it might be an inside job because of the accuracy of the diary items.

After tricking media from “China to Washington”, they have decided to stop posting to the account because they didn’t want to bring themselves or Miliband into disrepute and “there was no where to go with this short of causing an actual diplomatic incident,” Crew said.

Their goal wasn’t to trick the media. “I’m not happy about duping the media, but they learned something,” he said. All journalists had to do to realise the account was fake was to read one or two of previous updates, such as this tweet: “The proleteriat make my head hurt!.” It’s also doubtful that David Miliband would ever refer to Chancellor Secretary Alistair Darling as “Eyebrows”.

“It does highlight the importance of the verification of sources, which is clearly becoming more difficult in the web 2.0 era,” the pair wrote in an email to the Guardian.

Noelle has just finished his journalism degree from City University, and Crew plans to start a journalism course. But the experience left Crew “a little bit disappointed” with journalism but said it was the result of newspapers cutting sub editors and lacking in fact checking.

They hope to make a living from writing, and one positive result from the hoax is that they now have the confidence to do it.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Iran frees UK embassy employees

Four still held for ‘interrogation’, says Iranian foreign ministry, amid claims of involvement in post-election unrest

Downing Street today condemned the continued detention of four Iranians employed by the country’s British embassy , as a partial recount of disputed presidential poll got under way.

Nine embassy staff were arrested on Saturday accused of playing a significant role in the protests. Five have since been released, while the other four are “being interrogated”, according Hassan Qashqavi, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesman.

Gordon Brown’s spokesman said: “We are deeply concerned at their arrest and their continued detention. These arrests are completely unacceptable and unjustifiable.”

Yesterday, the Iranian intelligence minister, Gholam Hossein Mohseini Ejehi, said Tehran had video proof that Iranian employees at the embassy “were distinctly present at the scene of clashes” following the 12 June election.

“The embassy sent its local staff to rallies and inculcated ideas into the protesters and the society,” he said.

Speaking last night, the foreign secretary, David Miliband, said some of the nine employees detained had been released.

He denied any had played a role in the clashes between security forces and demonstrators.

“We have protested in strong terms, directly to the Iranian authorities, about the arrests,” he said.

“The idea that the British embassy is somehow behind the demonstrations and protests that have been taking place in Tehran … is wholly without foundation.”

The EU demanded that all the detained embassy employees be freed.

The escalation followed attacks on Britain by the Iranian authorities and media, who have singled out the UK for allegedly fomenting trouble. The British embassy is in a compound behind walls three metres high on Ferdowsi Avenue in central Tehran. It has at least 70 local employees.

Harassment by Iranian security forces is common but arrests are not.

Last week, as protests continued over the election, Iran expelled two British diplomats, prompting the tit-for-tat expulsion of two diplomats from Iran’s London embassy. The families of British embassy staff have left Iran.

Iran’s powerful guardian council began the partial election recount today but has offered to recount only 10% of the votes.

It has dismissed claims of large-scale vote rigging and refused to annul the result, which saw the incumbent president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, returned to power.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, denounced “interfering statements” by western officials and appealed to both sides in the dispute “not to stoke the emotions of the young”.

But Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, his rival and a former president, demanded a “fair and thorough” review of complaints about the election, in which Ahmadinejad was declared to have won 63% of the vote.

Rafsanjani is backing the reformist candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, who claims he was the winner.

On his website, Mousavi said he was not dropping his challenge despite pressure from Iran’s ruling clergy.

He has rejected a partial recount, and his supporters defied riot police and militiamen to hold a mourning rally outside a mosque in the capital, Tehran.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



Iran warned over embassy arrests

David Miliband demanded last night that British embassy staff arrested in Tehran be released as the EU warned of a “strong and collective response” to the latest spat between Iran and the west over post-election unrest.

The foreign secretary denied that the employees, all Iranians, had played a “significant role” in clashes between security forces and demonstrators complaining about the “theft” of the presidential poll.

“We have protested in strong terms, directly to the Iranian authorities, about the arrests,” Miliband said. “The idea that the British embassy is somehow behind the demonstrations and protests that have been taking place in Tehran … is wholly without foundation.”

Miliband said nine unnamed embassy employees were arrested on Saturday, and four had subsequently been released. The EU demanded yesterday that they all be freed. The staff include a highly regarded political adviser whose job is to keep colleagues abreast of the Islamic republic’s internal politics. Unlike British nationals, they do not enjoy diplomatic immunity.

Iranian leaders kept up their own angry exchanges over the crisis. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, denounced “interfering statements” by western officials and appealed to both sides in the dispute “not to stoke the emotions of the young”.

But Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, his rival and a former president, demanded a “fair and thorough” review of complaints about the election, in which incumbent hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared the winner with 63% of the vote.

Khamenei and the guardian council – Iran’s top legislative body – have ruled out significant revisions of the result, banking on repression to quell protests in which at least 20 people have been killed. Rafsanjani is backing Mir Hossein Mousavi, who claims he was the winner.

Mousavi said on his website he was not dropping his challenge despite pressure from Iran’s ruling clergy. He has rejected a partial recount. Mousavi supporters defied riot police and basij militiamen to hold a mourning rally outside a Tehran mosque.

The EU’s support for Britain over the embassy arrests raised the stakes as the regime continued to pin the blame for the unrest on foreign meddling. “Harassment and intimidation would meet a strong and collective EU response,” foreign ministers said in Corfu.

“Obviously the regime is trying to preserve its position by very harsh repression,” said Carl Bildt, Sweden’s foreign minister, whose country takes over the EU’s rotating presidency on 1 July. “But that cannot hide the fact that this is a weakened regime. It has lost legitimacy both internally and externally.”

The latest escalation follows daily attacks on Britain by the Iranian authorities and media, who have singled it out for allegedly fomenting trouble.

The British embassy is in a compound behind 10ft walls on Ferdowsi avenue in central Tehran. It has at least 70 local employees. Harassment by Iranian security forces is common but arrests are not.

Last week, as protests continued over the election, Iran expelled two British diplomats – the embassy’s second and third secretaries. That prompted the tit-for-tat expulsion of two diplomats from Iran’s London embassy. The families of British embassy staff have left Iran.

Iran’s foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, has warned that Tehran is considering downgrading ties with Britain. The intelligence minister, Gholamhossein Mosheni-Ejei, said some people with British passports were involved in violence and had joined crowds in the city to stir up unrest.

The Greek-British journalist and Guardian contributor Iason Athanasiadis, also known as Jason Fowden, has been detained. The BBC correspondent Jon Leyne was expelled last week.

On Friday a senior cleric, Ahmed Khatami, lashed out at Britain in a televised sermon. “In this unrest, Britons have behaved very mischievously and it is fair to add the slogan of ‘down with England’ to the slogan of ‘down with USA,’” he said. He also called for the execution of what he called “rioters’ leaders”. The previous week Khamenei had criticised Britain as the “most evil” country.

Iranian-British relations have been dogged by mutual suspicion and resentment for decades but they have deteriorated since the war in Iraq and Ahmadinejad’s presidency. Iran’s nuclear ambitions and support for Hezbollah and Hamas have kept the regime at odds with Britain, the US and other western countries as well as Israel.

January’s launch of BBC Persian TV infuriated the Iranians, whose harassment then forced the closure of the British Council offices in Tehran.

Parviz Sarvari, an MP, told the Fars news agency on Saturday: “The nation’s tolerance for Britain’s hidden policy of interference is over. There would be a crushing response … Unfortunately, Britain is continuing its espionage-centred and deceitful approach.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds