RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Downing Street’

PM ‘will listen to Army demands’

Demands for more equipment to protect UK forces in Afghanistan from roadside bombs will be considered, the government has promised.

The head of the British army, Gen Sir Richard Dannatt, says he is compiling a "shopping list" including surveillance and intelligence equipment.

Downing Street says the PM will take decisions in "light of military advice" and review troop levels with allies.

Meanwhile, the 185th British death of the conflict has been confirmed.

A soldier from the 2nd Battalion The Rifles died in an explosion while on foot patrol near Gereshk in central Helmand, the Ministry of Defence said.

He was the 16th to die this month, as the British army continues an offensive aimed at increasing security ahead of Afghan elections planned for next month.

‘Critical’

Critics have accused the government of failing to properly equip troops and leaving them short of helicopter support.

Gen Dannatt, who steps down from his role next month, told the BBC it was "critical" to tackle the problem of improvised bombs.

Doing this required more coalition or Afghan personnel to build intelligence, better "overhead surveillance" of Taliban activity and greater technical ability to see where they were planting explosives, he said.

"That will be a shopping list that I’ll bring back," he added.

Business secretary Lord Mandelson said the general’s views on troops’ equipment requirements would be taken "very seriously".

More from Today programme

Soldier dies in Afghan explosion

Military doctor shortage warning

"They will not go without whatever they need to carry out their very important operations in Afghanistan," he said.

Gordon Brown spent 40 minutes with Chief of the Defence Staff, Sir Jock Stirrup, on Friday morning.

Afterwards, Sir Jock told the BBC he was "busting a gut" to get more helicopters redeployed to Afghanistan.

"I have always said that there’s no such thing as enough helicopters in an operation campaign," he said.

"If you are an operational commander, you can always do more and do things better the more helicopters you have."

The prime minister’s spokesman said Sir Jock would go into further detail about equipment requirements in the future.

"Of course, we will take decisions in the light of that military advice," added the spokesman.

He said there would be a wider review of troop numbers, both at UK and Nato level, in the autumn.

"We will review the position on troops along with our allies after the election," he added.

Gen Dannatt had said that, despite reports, the military never made a direct request for 2,000 extra personnel.

But he warned that reducing numbers to 8,300 would be wrong and that Nato may ask for more personnel for a 12 to 18-month period.

Shadow defence secretary Dr Liam Fox told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme it was "extremely likely" that, if the Conservatives were in power, they would agree to a request for more British troops in the short term.

"If we had a direct request from the head of the armed forces that they needed something specific to maximise the chance of success of the mission and minimise the risk to our forces, of course we would have to say ‘yes’ to that," he said.


What are your experiences of the equipment used by the British military in the field Are you satisfied that the kit is up to date and fit for purpose Send us your stories using the form below.

<p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Purnell: Labour is living in the past

Exclusive: Former cabinet minister says he has no regrets in first major interview since nearly toppling Gordon Brown

Read Purnell’s full interview in the Guardian tomorrow

James Purnell, the former cabinet minister whose resignation almost toppled the prime minister, tells the Guardian today that he is unlikely to ever return to frontline politics and calls on the Labour party to stop the “nostalgic” hankering for the heyday of New Labour in the late 1990s.

In his first major interview since he quit as work and pensions secretary last month, Purnell likens that period in politics to the dynamism and excitement of the music scene generated around Oasis and Blur. “All those Blairite, New Labour labels … for me it’s a bit like Britpop – I feel nostalgic for it, it was absolutely right for its time, but that time was 1994.”

Purnell was one of the most senior ministers of the 11 who walked out of Brown’s government last month and the only one to directly call on the prime minister to stand down. In his resignation letter, Purnell told the prime minister: “I now believe your continued leadership makes a Conservative victory more, not less likely.”

In his exclusive interview with the Guardian, which will run in full in tomorrow’s paper, the former Downing Street adviser to Tony Blair talks about his career spanning nearly 20 years in politics.

On Monday, Purnell will launch a three-year project at the thinktank Demos on the future of the Labour party, called Open Left. It will include contributions from the respected leftwing backbenchers Jon Cruddas and Alan Simpson.

Rasing doubts about the government track record over 12 years on schools, immigration policy and electoral reform, Purnell says he wants to “try and be as radical on the left as on the right”.

He showers praise on the foreign secretary, David Miliband, and explains the circumstances surrounding his decision to resign from Brown’s government on 6 June as polls closed in council and European elections.

“The moment when it became a really simple decision to take was when I stopped worrying about what exactly would be the consequences of different things and when I realised I just had to be true to myself. I couldn’t go on the telly the following morning and say something I couldn’t believe.”

Describing life after government, he says: “The thing I worked out is that I really loved policy and I love leading an organisation like DWP. Politics, I don’t miss as much. Journalists, I don’t miss as much.

“I love having a weekend. I love not having a red box hanging over me all weekend.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Gordon Brown spent £4.6m on globetrotting last year

Brit Prime Minister Gordon Brown has been revealed to have spent 4.6million pounds flying round the world in private chartered aircraft over the last year at taxpayers’ expense.
Turns out the travel fare is double the 2.3million pounds bill that Tony Blair ran up in his final year in Downing Street, reports the Daily Express.
The aircraft [...]

More helicopters ‘would save lives’

Sir Jock Stirrup says military is ‘busting a gut’ to draft more of the vehicles into service

The deployment of more helicopters in Afghanistan would save soldiers’ lives, the head of the armed forces said today.

Sir Jock Stirrup, the chief of the defence staff, said his forces needed as many helicopters as they could get and were “busting a gut” to draft more into service.

His comments came as the British death toll in Afghanistan continued to rise as another soldier was killed in an explosion while on foot patrol.

Speaking in Downing Street after talks with Gordon Brown, Stirrup said: “In this situation where you have lots of improvised explosive devices, the more you can increase your tactical flexibility by moving people by helicopters then the more unpredictable your movements become to the enemy. Therefore it is quite patently the case that you could save casualties by doing that.”

But he warned that helicopters were “not invulnerable either”, adding: “There is no panacea to this problem.”

Asked about the row over whether British forces in Afghanistan had enough helicopters, the air chief marshal said there was “no such thing as enough helicopters in an operational campaign”.

“If you are an operational commander you can always do more and do things better the more helicopters you have,” he went on.

“If I thought we had enough helicopters in Afghanistan frankly we wouldn’t be busting a gut to get the Merlins we had deployed in Iraq ready to go out this time to Afghanistan. We wouldn’t be working as hard as we are to try to get these eight Chinooks that have been sitting on the ground unusable for years into a condition where we can deploy them next year.

“We need as many helicopters out there as we can get.”

Stirrup insisted that the current force size in Afghanistan was a “baseline”.

“We are at 9,000; that is our baseline. After the elections we will see what else we can do.”

He said he had put chief of the general staff Sir Richard Dannatt’s “shopping list” of extra equipment for operations in Afghanistan to Brown during their talks.

“The prime minister was very interested in that and we will be looking at that as a matter of urgency,” he added.

Stirrup said news of the latest British fatality in Helmand province was “extremely sad”.

“We said that this is going to be a hard summer of fighting in Afghanistan, and that is how it is turning out to be. But it is also a very successful summer of fighting,” he said.

“We are taking away from the Taliban some of their vital ground, and they are desperately trying to stop us taking it away from them. And they are failing.”

Downing Street said Dannatt’s recommendations would be looked at “very seriously”.

“There will be an internal process in the Ministry of Defence to look at how these recommendations can be implemented,” a spokesman said.

He added: “Of course we will look at this very seriously.”

The spokesman refused to say how any changes would be funded.

“The recommendations will be looked at by the Ministry of Defence in the normal way and they will look at both the impact on the Ministry of Defence budget and the urgent operational requirements.

“But I’m not at this stage going to make a judgment on where they will be resourced from.”

Stirrup and the prime minister spoke for 40 minutes this morning.

The Downing Street spokesman said it was “entirely normal” that the head of the army should return from Afghanistan with recommendations.

“The chief of the general staff, the chief of the defence staff, the prime minister and government ministers are working very hard to ensure that our troops and commanders on the ground have what they need to ensure they can carry out their operations successfully,” he added.

Dannatt said this morning that a planned reduction in troop numbers from 9,000 after the Afghan elections this year would be the “wrong thing to do”.

“There is a thought out there that, from 9,000 that we are growing up to, that it might come down to 8,300,” he said. “My observation from looking at this operation over the last couple of days is that would be the wrong thing to do.”

He warned that the UK may even have to increase its military presence in Afghanistan if the case for a “short-term uplift” is made by the United States.

General Stanley McChrystal, the new US military commander in Afghanistan, is conducting a review.

Dannatt, who is retiring as chief of the general staff this month, said: “There may well be a case for what I would call a short-term uplift. Let’s not use the ‘surge’ word; that’s sort of been worked to extinction in Iraq previously.

“But there may well be a case – and our government will have to confront it if asked – for about 12 to 18 months while the Afghan national army can get the right strength down here, for us to uplift.

“It would be the right thing in the short term for us to stay at 9,000. Down to 8,300 would be wrong – militarily I’m quite clear about that, and, as a member of the chiefs of staff committee, I couldn’t sign up to that now.”

Lady Taylor, the junior defence minister, said Britain had enough troops in Afghanistan for the task and she was not aware that the armed forces had requested any equipment that the government had not provided.

Speaking on a tour of a BAE Systems munitions factory near Usk, Monmouthshire, Taylor said: “The head of the army has been giving us his views for the last few years while he has been in charge, and we have responded and the Treasury responded to the urgent operational requirements that we need.

“I don’t know of anything that the armed forces have asked for that we’ve not been able to provide by way of equipment. And if you talk to people who are on the frontline on operations they will tell you that the equipment that the British military has is the best that they have ever had in their history.

“We are not complacent. We still want to improve it further because we need to keep developing it to keep one step ahead of everybody else.”

She said troop levels were under “constant review”. “What we have got are the troops we need for the task that we are doing at the moment,” she said.

“It is a difficult phase. We’ve sent extra troops because we know we are in the run-up to the elections and we know that the insurgents are trying to disrupt those elections.”

She said UK forces could share helicopters with their allies in Afghanistan.

“I think there are some simplistic approaches taken sometimes about helicopters, because whilst helicopters are extremely important there are lots of things they can’t do and they can be vulnerable.

“They can’t help if you want to get somewhere quietly at night for a surprise attack. They can’t help you to hold the ground that you have taken and that’s very important in the phase that we are in.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Troops need more, says Army head

General Sir Richard Dannatt (right)

The head of the UK Army has said better equipment is needed to protect troops from roadside bombs in Afghanistan.

General Sir Richard Dannatt told the BBC troops "needed more" and added that he would be compiling a shopping list of what was required.

Gordon Brown has repeatedly insisted the Army has enough equipment and denied claims of a helicopter shortage.

The general’s comments will be seen as careful "parting shots", says the BBC’s defence correspondent Caroline Wyatt.

Gen Dannatt gave his interview as he prepared to step down as head of the British Army next month.

"We need more and that will be a shopping list that I’ll bring back"

General Sir Richard Dannatt

Our correspondent says Gen Dannatt has long been "a vocal advocate" of the need for the nation to take care of the welfare of its Armed Forces.

In return for their service, he says more money needs to be spent on equipment for British forces in Afghanistan

The general, who is on his last trip to Afghanistan before he stands down, earlier reportedly angered Downing Street when he made it clear he had been flown in an American helicopter, thus making clear no British alternative had been available.

In response, ministers have pointed out that all coalition helicopters in Afghanistan are available for use by all NATO allies.

Last week the outspoken general drew fire when comments he made about the presence of UK troops in Iraq were interpreted as "unconstitutional".

Now his recent comments about the alleged shortage of equipment in Afghanistan have hit a raw nerve in a month in which 15 British soldiers have died in Helmand – 12 killed by roadside bombs.

Extra troops

The sensitivity of the subject was underlined on Thursday, when the prime minister avoided giving a direct answer to a committee of MPs as to whether he had received or rejected a request for an extra 2000 troops in Helmand.

HAVE YOUR SAY

" Helicopters are essential in any war where the enemy is laying mines or IEDs. To say otherwise is a clear signal that Gordon Brown does not value the lives of British servicemen and women"

Roger Hart, Deal

Send us your comments

But while Gen Dannatt has previously called for more "boots on the ground", he has stressed the extra resources could be British, American or Afghan.

In his latest interview he said that surveillance of the Taliban needed to be improved so that the Army could see where the bombs were being laid.

Gen Dannatt added: "We need more, and that will be a shopping list that I’ll bring back."

The big increase in UK casualties has come as coalition troops conduct a military offensive designed to increase security ahead of Afghan elections next month.

So far, 184 UK service personnel have now died in Afghanistan since 2001 – more than the 179 who were killed during the war in Iraq. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Brucie and Motty on PM’s guest list

Statement shows which politicians, celebrities and journalists were entertained at the prime minister’s country residence

The entertainer Bruce Forsyth and the football commentator John Motson were among those who received official hospitality at Chequers over the last year, Gordon Brown revealed today.

Their names are included on a list of all those entertained at the prime minister’s country residence in 2008-2009, a ministerial statement showed.

The list – which includes a large number of politicians and journalists – always attracts considerable interest at Westminster, where it is seen as a guide to who belongs to the Brown social circle.

Embarrassingly for the prime minister, Sir Fred Goodwin, the bank boss blamed for the demise of RBS, was one of the City figures to enjoy the prime minister’s hospitality.

Downing Street did not say when guests were entertained at Downing Street, or whether they attended functions at Chequers, in Buckinghamshire, more than once.

Celebrities on the list include the showbiz stars Matt Lucas, David Walliams and Davina McCall, the author John O’Farrell, the singer Lesley Garrett, the actors Alan Rickman, Emma Thompson and Greg Wise and the runner Dame Kelly Holmes.

The former poet laureate Sir Andrew Motion and the former children’s laureate Michael Rosen were also guests.

Senior ministers invited to join Brown included Ed Balls and his wife, Yvette Cooper, Nick Brown, Liam Byrne, Alistair Darling, Lord Drayson, Harriet Harman, Tessa Jowell, Ed Miliband, Lord Myners, Lord West and Shaun Woodward

Sir Menzies Campbell, the former Liberal Democrat leader and a long-time friend of Brown from Scotland, was invited there, as was his wife, Lady Elspeth.

Journalists on the list include ITN’s Tom Bradby, Sky’s Kay Burley, GMTV’s Gloria de Piero, the Spectator’s Matthew d’Ancona, Will Lewis, Patrick Hennessy, Andrew Porter and Benedict Brogan, of Telegraph newspapers, Katharine Viner and Jonathan Freedland from the Guardian, Philip Webster from the Times, the Mirror’s Kevin Maguire, the Sun’s George Pascoe Watson and the Observer editor John Mulholland.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



UK backs Blair for EU president, Kinnock says

• Kinnock says government will support former PM
• Tories say: ‘He should be let nowhere near the job’

Tony Blair is a leading contender to become the first president of the EU and has the full backing of the British government for the job, the new Europe minister, Lady Kinnock, announced today.

In 10 years as prime minister, Blair shunned the single currency, backed Bush over Brussels and went to war in Iraq. Many in Europe have never forgiven him.

But the long-held suspicion in European politics was confirmed when Lady Kinnock, the Europe minister in Strasbourg for the parliament’s opening session, said that although Blair had not formally declared his candidacy, it was “certainly” the government position to support him.

“I am sure they would not do it without asking him,” she said. “The UK government is supporting Tony Blair’s candidature for president of the council.”

It was the first definite statement on the matter. The Blair camp, in Jerusalem as he continues his current job as a Middle East envoy, was caught off guard. “Nothing has changed. The job doesn’t exist, so there is nothing to be a candidate for,” said a Blair spokesman.

The post will be created under the Lisbon treaty, streamlining the way the EU is run, if the Irish endorse it in a referendum in early October. Blair would be the first sitting president of the EU, appointed by European government chiefs for a minimum of 30 months and a maximum of five years.

If the Irish vote yes on 2 October, EU leaders are expected to decide who will get the top job at a summit at the end of October.

“Blair is seen by many as someone who has the strength of character, the stature,” said Kinnock.

“People know who he is and he would be someone who would have this role and step into it with a lot of respect and I think would be generally welcomed.”

British diplomats were also caught off-guard and cautioned that Kinnock’s remarks remained speculation.

“The reality is Lisbon has not entered into force,” said a diplomat. “Blair has yet to say whether he will stand.”

Downing Street went further than it had in confirming that Blair was the government’s candidate, if he wanted it, but indicated Kinnock had gone further than No 10 had wanted.

“What the prime minister supports is Tony Blair’s candidature for the president of the European council if Tony Blair decides that that is what he would like to do and as and when such a position exists.

“I’m not sure I would characterise it [Kinnock's remarks] as an announcement. I don’t think it is any surprise that the Europe minister in this government has said that we would support Tony Blair as a candidate.”

William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, said the post would be “enormously damaging” for Europe. “Any holder is likely to try to centralise power for themselves in Brussels and dominate national foreign policies. In the hands of an operator as ambitious as Tony Blair, that is a near certainty. He should be let nowhere near the job.”

The founder of New Labour will almost certainly encounter stiff opposition, although he has few peers in Europe who could match him for international name recognition or contacts.

Fredrik Reinfeldt, the Swedish prime minister who took over the rotating presidency of the EU this month and who will chair the October summit, is known to be strongly opposed to a “President Blair”.

He told the Guardian todaythat he would not get into any discussion of names for the post, while a senior European diplomat said that the Europe president post would be “the absolute top subject” at the October summit.

José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, the Spanish PM who takes over the EU presidency after Reinfeldt in January, is also an opponent. Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany is not believed to be keen. France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy, an early fan of Blair for the role, might calculate that it would be better to side with German and Spanish leaders than support the British.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Dan Persons: Mighty Movie Podcast: The Downing Street Memo, For Laughs: Armando Iannucci on In the Loop

I’m not going to say that In the Loop — the new British political comedy directed by Armando Iannucci and based on his award-winning BBC…

PM demands more troops from Kabul in Helmand

PM says Afghan soldiers must hold ground taken by British forces

Gordon Brown has told the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, to put more Afghan troops into Helmand province immediately to make sure the costly territorial gains made by UK forces are not lost and British soldiers do not die in vain.

Amid mounting political pressure on the government over the sharp rise in British fatalities this month, Brown issued his demand to Karzai in a phone conversation on Sunday after talks with the US president, Barack Obama.

Less than 10% of the 80,000-strong Afghan army are stationed in Helmand even though 50% of the fighting is being conducted in the Taliban stronghold.

British forces have been repeatedly frustrated that they capture vital ground only for it to be ceded within months due to the lack of Afghan soldiers to move in and take control. There are only 500 Afghan troops involved in the British Operation Panther’s Claw in Helmand province.

Brown said bluntly he wanted to see “a very substantial increase” in Afghan troop numbers.

He also gave a strong indication that the British presence will remain at the current figure of just over 9,000 troops, or might even increase after the Afghan presidential elections in August and a US-led 60-day review of the entire Nato Afghan strategy. Britain is also temporarily sending an extra 140 soldiers from Cyprus.

The US-led review is likely to see General Stanley A McChrystal, the new senior commander in Afghanistan, recommend that the Afghan army will have to grow even faster than the planned expansion from 85,000 to 134,000, which was initially expected to take five years but now fast-tracked for completion by 2011.

US marines, currently deploying to Helmand, have been struck by the lack of support from the Afghan army.

The Foreign Office minister Lord Malloch Brown recently highlighted the UK’s concern, saying: “We need to look at some slightly out-of-the-box solutions to supplement the numbers we have who are willing to protect communities from Taliban activity.”

There is also a growing worry that the presidential election in August will fall way short of a democratic poll, with some observers fearing ballot rigging that will make the recent Iranian elections look like a model of western democracy.

In a Commons statement today, Brown brushed aside Conservative and Liberal Democrat claims that British troops are dying due to insufficient troop numbers or resources. He said: “It has been a very difficult summer and it is not over yet but if we are to deny Helmand to the Taliban in the long term, if we are to defeat this insurgency, and by doing so make Britain and the world a safer place, then we must persist with our operations in Afghanistan … I am confident that we are right to be in Afghanistan, that we have the strongest possible plan.”

But a Populus poll for ITV’s News at Ten found 75% of the population believe that the troops are inadequately supplied and equipped for the war.

The Tories claim there is a shortage of helicopters and blame Brown for cutting the helicopter budget by £1.4bn in 2004.

It was noticeable that the Tories reined back on some of their rhetoric today, but the Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, said the government strategy was “over-ambitious and under-resourced”.

Brown said the British military had told him that they had sufficient troops for current operational requirements. He also denied that any helicopter shortfall had led to the recent British deaths.

Lieutenant Colonel Nick Richardson, an army spokesman, offered Downing Street a measure of support, saying: “You could put as many helicopters as you wanted in here, but sadly at the end of the day troops have to go on the ground. You cannot defeat the enemy from a helicopter.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Six-year-old and GP die of swine flu

Chloe Buckley, from north-west London, and Bedfordshire GP Michael Day take UK death toll to 17

A six-year-old girl and a GP have died from swine flu, taking the number of UK deaths linked to the virus to 17, it was announced today.

Chloe Buckley, from north-west London, died on Thursday at St Mary’s hospital in Paddington after contracting the virus in the UK. Bedfordshire GP Dr Michael Day died on Saturday in the Luton and Dunstable hospital.

A post-mortem examination will be carried out on Chloe to determine whether she had any underlying health conditions, said Dr Simon Tanner, from NHS London.

A swab test has shown that Day had swine flu but his death will be investigated by the local coroner to determine its exact cause, a statement from NHS East of England said.

It comes after the first British patient without underlying health problems died on Friday after contracting swine flu. The patient, from Essex, died in Basildon.

Earlier today, it was disclosed that the virus had reached Downing Street. It is understood that Gordon Brown’s adviser on climate change, Michael Jacobs, has been infected.

Nearly 10,000 Britons have been confirmed with swine flu after it spread to the UK from Mexico. However, hundreds of thousands more people in the UK are thought to have the virus.

The total number of cases in the country are now being estimated rather than counted individually.

The UK has the third highest case total in the world after Mexico, which has 10,262 cases, and the US, which has at least 33,902.

Speaking about Chloe’s death, Dr Tanner said: “We don’t know if she had underlying health issues.

“There is a post-mortem examination planned. At that point we hope to say if there were underlying health problems.”

Chloe’s death brings the number of swine flu-related deaths in the capital to six.

Tanner said it was difficult to say exactly how many people have caught the virus, now patients are no longer swabbed. He said most people who contracted the virus would experience mild symptoms and feel better within a few days.

The advice to regularly wash hands and throw away used tissues remains the same, he added.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Swine flu strikes Downing Street adviser

The first case of swine flu has struck Downing Street and it nearly caused a diplomatic crisis.

Gordon Brown’s senior climate change adviser Michael Jacobs was banned from attending the G8 summit in Italy for fear he would pass the contagious disease to Barack Obama and other world leaders.

It is understood that Jacobs contracted the disease while involved in climate change talks in Mexico.

He had travelled to Rome for some preliminary negotiations on the draft of the G8 communique text, and was told by his personal doctor that he was no longer suffering from the disease. He then planned to travel to the conference site in L’Aquila, Italy, but was told by Brown that he could not risk him going.

The prime minister told Jacobs it would be diplomatically disastrous if Britain was responsible for infecting the G8′s leaders. Instead, Jacobs followed negotiations by phone.

A Downing Street source said there was no evidence that anyone else in Brown’s entourage has contracted swine flu and that if they had, proper procedures for decontamination will be followed.

Jacobs is seen as the one of the best informed climate change specialists in Britain and his absence from the talks was regarded as a significant loss. He made no mention of contracting the disease or the ban imposed on him when he sent out a circular to those interested in climate change setting out the outcome of the negotiations, and the problems that lie ahead in securing a deal at Copenhagen at the end of the year.

Jacobs, former general secretary of the Fabian Society, clearly did not regard his absence as fatal to the outcome of the summit since he pointed out in his email to green groups that five big achievements had been secured at the L’Aquila talks,

For the first time the G8 and developing nations agreed that the science demanded global average temperatures rise by only 2C on preindustrial levels.

“Until a few weeks ago, in fact in the case of the developing countries until a few days ago we did not believe we were going to get this agreement,” he said.

Secondly, the G8 agreed to cut its own emissions by 80% by 2050.

He also said it was now possible to see an agreement to cut global emissions by half at Copenhagen, the aim of the talks. The G8 meetings had seen developing countries for the first time accept the concept that their emissions were peaking, Jacobs said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Swine flu strikes Downing Street adviser

The first case of swine flu has struck Downing Street and it nearly caused a diplomatic crisis.

Gordon Brown’s senior climate change adviser Michael Jacobs was banned from attending the G8 summit in Italy for fear he would pass the contagious disease to Barack Obama and other world leaders.

It is understood that Jacobs contracted the disease while involved in climate change talks in Mexico.

He had travelled to Rome for some preliminary negotiations on the draft of the G8 communique text, and was told by his personal doctor that he was no longer suffering from the disease. He then planned to travel to the conference site in L’Aquila, Italy, but was told by Brown that he could not risk him going.

The prime minister told Jacobs it would be diplomatically disastrous if Britain was responsible for infecting the G8′s leaders. Instead, Jacobs followed negotiations by phone.

A Downing Street source said there was no evidence that anyone else in Brown’s entourage has contracted swine flu and that if they had, proper procedures for decontamination will be followed.

Jacobs is seen as the one of the best informed climate change specialists in Britain and his absence from the talks was regarded as a significant loss. He made no mention of contracting the disease or the ban imposed on him when he sent out a circular to those interested in climate change setting out the outcome of the negotiations, and the problems that lie ahead in securing a deal at Copenhagen at the end of the year.

Jacobs, former general secretary of the Fabian Society, clearly did not regard his absence as fatal to the outcome of the summit since he pointed out in his email to green groups that five big achievements had been secured at the L’Aquila talks,

For the first time the G8 and developing nations agreed that the science demanded global average temperatures rise by only 2C on preindustrial levels.

“Until a few weeks ago, in fact in the case of the developing countries until a few days ago we did not believe we were going to get this agreement,” he said.

Secondly, the G8 agreed to cut its own emissions by 80% by 2050.

He also said it was now possible to see an agreement to cut global emissions by half at Copenhagen, the aim of the talks. The G8 meetings had seen developing countries for the first time accept the concept that their emissions were peaking, Jacobs said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Swine flu strikes Downing Street adviser

The first case of swine flu has struck Downing Street and it nearly caused a diplomatic crisis.

Gordon Brown’s senior climate change adviser Michael Jacobs was banned from attending the G8 summit in Italy for fear he would pass the contagious disease to Barack Obama and other world leaders.

It is understood that Jacobs contracted the disease while involved in climate change talks in Mexico.

He had travelled to Rome for some preliminary negotiations on the draft of the G8 communique text, and was told by his personal doctor that he was no longer suffering from the disease. He then planned to travel to the conference site in L’Aquila, Italy, but was told by Brown that he could not risk him going.

The prime minister told Jacobs it would be diplomatically disastrous if Britain was responsible for infecting the G8′s leaders. Instead, Jacobs followed negotiations by phone.

A Downing Street source said there was no evidence that anyone else in Brown’s entourage has contracted swine flu and that if they had, proper procedures for decontamination will be followed.

Jacobs is seen as the one of the best informed climate change specialists in Britain and his absence from the talks was regarded as a significant loss. He made no mention of contracting the disease or the ban imposed on him when he sent out a circular to those interested in climate change setting out the outcome of the negotiations, and the problems that lie ahead in securing a deal at Copenhagen at the end of the year.

Jacobs, former general secretary of the Fabian Society, clearly did not regard his absence as fatal to the outcome of the summit since he pointed out in his email to green groups that five big achievements had been secured at the L’Aquila talks,

For the first time the G8 and developing nations agreed that the science demanded global average temperatures rise by only 2C on preindustrial levels.

“Until a few weeks ago, in fact in the case of the developing countries until a few days ago we did not believe we were going to get this agreement,” he said.

Secondly, the G8 agreed to cut its own emissions by 80% by 2050.

He also said it was now possible to see an agreement to cut global emissions by half at Copenhagen, the aim of the talks. The G8 meetings had seen developing countries for the first time accept the concept that their emissions were peaking, Jacobs said.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds