RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Ed Miliband’

Wind power boosted by £1bn loans

Figures from Greenpeace show Conservative-run councils blocking three times as many wind farms as they approve

The government will today demonstrate its willingness to exert influence over Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group by announcing £1bn of lending to wind farm developers whose schemes have been becalmed by a lack of cash.

The initiative comes as Greenpeace unveils new figures showing that local councils run by the Conservative party block more than three times as many wind farms as they approve. Labour-controlled councils meanwhile approved marginally more projects than they turned down between December 2005 and November 2008, according to the campaign group.

Both issues are important because Vestas, the UK’s only major wind turbine maker, is threatening to close its manufacturing plant on the Isle of Wight this week blaming some of its woes on “faceless nimbies” and a lack of a vibrant domestic market.

Ed Miliband, the energy and climate change secretary, will argue that the £1bn of loans organised through the partly state-owned banks and the European Investment Bank (EIB) will kick-start 1 gigawatt of onshore wind schemes delayed by the credit crunch – enough to power 2 million homes. The government does not want the loans to be seen as a specific attempt to save the Vestas plant, which is at the centre of a sit-in by workers.

“Earlier this month we laid out a transition plan to a low-carbon economy that included a massive expansion of green wind energy,” Miliband will say. “The resources we are announcing back up our plans with clear actions to ensure we deliver. The money for the development of offshore wind manufacturing will help us generate green jobs on top of our success as the leading country in the world for the generation of offshore wind.

“Alongside these proposals, we are reforming planning laws, finding new ways of working with local communities and are determined to persuade people that we need a significant increase in onshore wind as part of the UK’s future energy mix.”

The £1bn cash arranged by the government is part of the additional £4bn of EIB lending to support UK energy projects announced in the spring budget. The government has been urged by environmentalists and thinktanks to use the state equity stakes in banks – gained when they had to be bailed out last autumn – to push them towards green projects.

But the loans are unlikely to change the decision of Vestas to close its manufacturing plant at Newport on the Isle of Wight. The Danish group exports the turbines from there to the US, but the blades are unsuitable for the UK market and America will in future be served from a new production line in Colorado.

Vestas was considering investing in a new type of blade for the UK market but said the credit crunch, soft pound and endless delays in planning projects had made this uncommercial.

Greenpeace claimed last night that its study of publicly available information provided to the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) showed that Tory councils approved 44.7 megawatts of onshore wind schemes but blocked 158.2MW. Labour-controlled councils approved 68.3MW and rejected 62.6MW.

“One of the reasons Britain’s green industrial revolution is yet to take off is the lack of domestic demand for wind turbines, and a key reason for that has been the attitude of many Conservative councils,” said John Sauven, Greenpeace’s executive director. “They need to be offered incentives to stop blocking wind developments, while David Cameron could make a difference straight away by making a crystal-clear commitment that a Tory Britain would meet the target to generate 20% of our energy from renewables by 2020.”

Vestas has insisted it will take no decision on the future of Newport and another facility at Southampton until the end of this month, when a formal consultation with its 600 staff ends. But the government seems resigned to the closure.

A research and development base at Newport will keep going and Vestas is expected to be one of the beneficiaries when a £10m R&D fund is distributed by the DECC, perhaps as early as this week. A second £10m fund will be launched by Miliband today and Vestas will also be eligible for funding from that.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Vestas is too vital to lose

The government must now put our money where its mouth was in the energy white paper and support the renewables industry

The chorus of red-green dissent over the proposed closure of Britain’s sole major wind turbine manufacturing plant perfectly indicates just how spectacularly this Labour government has failed both workers and the environment. In microcosm, the situation in the Isle of Wight demonstrates the extent to which ministers have ignored calls to promote the renewables industry – squandering opportunity after opportunity to create or protect jobs in fledgling green industries, as well as to meet the UK’s greenhouse gas reduction targets.

But it also illustrates the creative way in which the unions and the green movement are recognising that they share a common agenda based on an understanding that green politics can deliver both jobs and social justice.

After the NHS and the council, Vestas is the largest employer on the Isle of Wight. The loss of 600 jobs during a time of economic recession will have a devastating effect on the community. But it is clear to all involved that the decision to close the factory has a wider significance beyond the island’s economy, and those workers currently occupying the plant in a valiant attempt to preserve their futures.

The decision to close the plant goes to the very heart of the critical challenge of our time: the need to address the economic and energy crises in a way which also tackles climate change head-on. It brings us right back to the Green New Deal, an innovative plan to restructure the economy through a billion-pound package for investing in green jobs – in renewables and energy efficiency – to dramatically reduce carbon emissions and cut householders’ fuel bills.

In the wake of its white paper on energy, expectations were high that the government might be offering companies like Vestas a real reason to maintain UK operations and thus protect UK jobs, through a more favourable policy environment and long-term investment plans, combined with any necessary loans or guarantees. But the rhetoric on renewable energy has yet to be matched with swift and tangible policy changes to ensure, for example, that the wind turbines we will need to build for a greener and more sustainable future make use of parts created in UK factories – not by workers thousands of miles away.

We are undoubtedly entering a period of public spending cuts. And by all means, let us cut the mindless spending of the previous decade of turbo-consumerism, as well as gratuitous spending on the military, renewal of the Trident weapons system, unnecessary ID card schemes or endless road-building. But we must replace this with targeted investment in the energy efficiency and renewable energy infrastructure we so urgently need to enable us to make a swift transition to a steady-state, zero carbon economy.

Thanks to years of government neglect, the wind energy industry suffers from a significant lack of demand in the UK and Europe. In the face of weighty pressure from the powerful “dirty” energy lobby – coal, gas and nuclear – the government has lacked the courage to give clear signals to encourage sustainable and profitable investment in the fledgling green industries.

The renewable industry has also suffered the consequences of an unwieldy and inconsistent planning system. Only an urgent reform of the UK’s planning system that would put environmental sustainability at its heart can ensure that renewable energy developments can prosper. Where there are pressures for conflicting environmental benefits, such as the need to exploit renewable energy opportunities while also seeking to protect the UK’s rural landscapes, we need improved dialogue and firmer planning regulations to ensure that green spaces, green belts and biodiverse brownfield sites are protected – while at the same time providing space for the renewable energy industry to grow.

The proposed Isle of Wight closure isn’t just a huge blow for the 600 skilled British workers set to lose their jobs. It threatens any attempt the UK makes to position itself at the forefront of global technological efforts to create a greener and more sustainable future. The renewables sector – and the public at large – need something more substantial than intentions laid out in white papers. Ministers could make a positive start by proving to Vestas, and other renewable energy players, that it is seriously committed to providing security for future investment, to a major overhaul in policy and planning, and to the crucial fight against climate change.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Vestas is too vital to lose

The government must now put our money where its mouth was in the energy white paper and support the renewables industry

The chorus of red-green dissent over the proposed closure of Britain’s sole major wind turbine manufacturing plant perfectly indicates just how spectacularly this Labour government has failed both workers and the environment. In microcosm, the situation in the Isle of Wight demonstrates the extent to which ministers have ignored calls to promote the renewables industry – squandering opportunity after opportunity to create or protect jobs in fledgling green industries, as well as to meet the UK’s greenhouse gas reduction targets.

But it also illustrates the creative way in which the unions and the green movement are recognising that they share a common agenda based on an understanding that green politics can deliver both jobs and social justice.

After the NHS and the council, Vestas is the largest employer on the Isle of Wight. The loss of 600 jobs during a time of economic recession will have a devastating effect on the community. But it is clear to all involved that the decision to close the factory has a wider significance beyond the island’s economy, and those workers currently occupying the plant in a valiant attempt to preserve their futures.

The decision to close the plant goes to the very heart of the critical challenge of our time: the need to address the economic and energy crises in a way which also tackles climate change head-on. It brings us right back to the Green New Deal, an innovative plan to restructure the economy through a billion-pound package for investing in green jobs – in renewables and energy efficiency – to dramatically reduce carbon emissions and cut householders’ fuel bills.

In the wake of its white paper on energy, expectations were high that the government might be offering companies like Vestas a real reason to maintain UK operations and thus protect UK jobs, through a more favourable policy environment and long-term investment plans, combined with any necessary loans or guarantees. But the rhetoric on renewable energy has yet to be matched with swift and tangible policy changes to ensure, for example, that the wind turbines we will need to build for a greener and more sustainable future make use of parts created in UK factories – not by workers thousands of miles away.

We are undoubtedly entering a period of public spending cuts. And by all means, let us cut the mindless spending of the previous decade of turbo-consumerism, as well as gratuitous spending on the military, renewal of the Trident weapons system, unnecessary ID card schemes or endless road-building. But we must replace this with targeted investment in the energy efficiency and renewable energy infrastructure we so urgently need to enable us to make a swift transition to a steady-state, zero carbon economy.

Thanks to years of government neglect, the wind energy industry suffers from a significant lack of demand in the UK and Europe. In the face of weighty pressure from the powerful “dirty” energy lobby – coal, gas and nuclear – the government has lacked the courage to give clear signals to encourage sustainable and profitable investment in the fledgling green industries.

The renewable industry has also suffered the consequences of an unwieldy and inconsistent planning system. Only an urgent reform of the UK’s planning system that would put environmental sustainability at its heart can ensure that renewable energy developments can prosper. Where there are pressures for conflicting environmental benefits, such as the need to exploit renewable energy opportunities while also seeking to protect the UK’s rural landscapes, we need improved dialogue and firmer planning regulations to ensure that green spaces, green belts and biodiverse brownfield sites are protected – while at the same time providing space for the renewable energy industry to grow.

The proposed Isle of Wight closure isn’t just a huge blow for the 600 skilled British workers set to lose their jobs. It threatens any attempt the UK makes to position itself at the forefront of global technological efforts to create a greener and more sustainable future. The renewables sector – and the public at large – need something more substantial than intentions laid out in white papers. Ministers could make a positive start by proving to Vestas, and other renewable energy players, that it is seriously committed to providing security for future investment, to a major overhaul in policy and planning, and to the crucial fight against climate change.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Reds and greens fight Vestas closure

A unique “red and green” army of trade union and environmental campaigners was on the march in an attempt to save from closure Britain’s only major wind turbine manufacturing plant.

Up to 500 people are expected outside the Vestas plant at Newport on the Isle of Wight tomorrow night where 25 workers are engaged in a sit-in, while further demonstrations are being planned simultaneously outside the Department of Energy and Climate Change in London.

Greenpeace said the Vestas dispute promised a historic change from a situation where the labour movement and environment activists have found themselves on different sides of the fence, with one wanting to shut down polluting industries and the other defending jobs.

“Although we have always tried to highlight the employment opportunities that could flow from a low-carbon economy, historically there has been animosity between the two sides. If we can build this new alliance and break down those perceived barriers then there all sorts of exciting opportunities,” said John Sauven, UK executive director of Greenpeace.

The RMT transport union endorsed the Vestas dispute as a springboard for closer co-operation, with its general secretary, Bob Crow – better known for addressing striking London Underground workers – visiting the wind plant today. He said: “There is an interesting coalition growing around Vestas that builds on issues where we have common cause such as public transport, which is really green transport. But this is a unique situation [on the Isle of Wight] involving globalisation, recession and the kind of low-carbon manufacturing jobs that everyone can relate to.”

The growing protests are embarrassing the energy and climate change secretary, Ed Miliband, who last week promised that thousands of new jobs would come from a new, low-carbon economy and now finds himself on the defensive over a decision by a cash-rich company to close a plant directly involved in renewable energy.

Miliband said he had been trying hard to help avoid job losses. “They [Vestas] are keeping a protoype facility at the factory and we are currently considering an application from them for government help to test and develop offshore wind blades in a facility which would employ 150 people on the Isle of Wight initially and potentially more later,” he said.

In April, Vestas announced plans to shut the manufacturing side of the Isle of Wight business with the potential loss of 600 jobs, saying it could produce blades cheaper in America.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Reds and greens fight Vestas closure

A unique “red and green” army of trade union and environmental campaigners was on the march in an attempt to save from closure Britain’s only major wind turbine manufacturing plant.

Up to 500 people are expected outside the Vestas plant at Newport on the Isle of Wight tomorrow night where 25 workers are engaged in a sit-in, while further demonstrations are being planned simultaneously outside the Department of Energy and Climate Change in London.

Greenpeace said the Vestas dispute promised a historic change from a situation where the labour movement and environment activists have found themselves on different sides of the fence, with one wanting to shut down polluting industries and the other defending jobs.

“Although we have always tried to highlight the employment opportunities that could flow from a low-carbon economy, historically there has been animosity between the two sides. If we can build this new alliance and break down those perceived barriers then there all sorts of exciting opportunities,” said John Sauven, UK executive director of Greenpeace.

The RMT transport union endorsed the Vestas dispute as a springboard for closer co-operation, with its general secretary, Bob Crow – better known for addressing striking London Underground workers – visiting the wind plant today. He said: “There is an interesting coalition growing around Vestas that builds on issues where we have common cause such as public transport, which is really green transport. But this is a unique situation [on the Isle of Wight] involving globalisation, recession and the kind of low-carbon manufacturing jobs that everyone can relate to.”

The growing protests are embarrassing the energy and climate change secretary, Ed Miliband, who last week promised that thousands of new jobs would come from a new, low-carbon economy and now finds himself on the defensive over a decision by a cash-rich company to close a plant directly involved in renewable energy.

Miliband said he had been trying hard to help avoid job losses. “They [Vestas] are keeping a protoype facility at the factory and we are currently considering an application from them for government help to test and develop offshore wind blades in a facility which would employ 150 people on the Isle of Wight initially and potentially more later,” he said.

In April, Vestas announced plans to shut the manufacturing side of the Isle of Wight business with the potential loss of 600 jobs, saying it could produce blades cheaper in America.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Meet Belcha, EU’s biggest polluter

• Polish facility pumps out 30m tonnes of CO2 a year
• Activists say giant plants undermine climate fight

The biggest single producer of carbon emissions in the European Union has been named – and it is about to get even bigger. The appropriately titled Elektrownia Belchatow – a massive coal-fired power station – belched out 30,862,792 tonnes of CO2 last year and by 2010 the whole generating facility will have grown by 20%.

The Polish energy giant was named as climate change enemy number one in a report by the London-based Sandbag Climate Campaign and its greenhouse gas output dwarfed the 22m tonnes of annual carbon produced by the Drax power station in North Yorkshire and a host of equally dirty German plants.

Sandbag said the expansion of Belchatow and the planned construction of 50 coal-fired plants across the European mainland demonstrated that policies such as the EU’s European Trading Scheme (ETS) were not working.

Bryony Worthington, founder of Sandbag, said the price of pollution allowances in the ETS was too low to deter companies from choosing coal over clean energy, noting that six of the 10 most polluting plants are in Germany despite generous government subsidies for solar and other clean technologies.

“They have to buy emission allowances yet they are still planning a massive expansion. If the scheme was having the desired effect they would be pursuing cleaner options now, not at some distant point in the future,” she added.

While British ministers have taken a stand against constructing new coal stations at Kingsnorth in Kent and elsewhere without “clean” technology to capture the emissions, the deluge of projects in Europe is undermining EU credibility ahead of the forthcoming UN negotiations in Copenhagen on tackling global warming, according to Mark Johnson, a Brussels-based campaigner at the WWF.

“Dozens of new unabated projects across Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland and elsewhere are either under construction or could soon be approved. Going ahead with these could wreck Europe’s climate strategy,” he said.

Elektrownia Belchatow is raising coal-fired capacity from 4,400 megawatts to 5,258 from next year. The facility, which burns the most polluting lignite “brown” coal from its own mine next door, is earmarked for a full carbon capture and storage prototype, but only by 2015 at the earliest.

A spokesman for French engineering company Alstom said they were working on a range of initiatives to improve the wider efficiency of the plant and reduce its carbon output. It is one of an estimated 11 new coal schemes planned in Poland, while 28 more are on the drawing board in Germany, according to the WWF.

While Poland has long been dependent on its home-mined lignite, Germany is expanding its coal-fired stations to produce electricity in anticipation of a rundown in its nuclear facilities.

This strategy, being pioneered by RWE and E.ON, could yet be changed as the two main political parties vying for power in the September elections have opposing views on how energy security should be achieved.

E.ON said that coal is being pursued because it answers some of the problems posed in the energy sector.

“It is a cheap form of power but it also gives security of supply and flexibility. The final element is obviously to find a way of not damaging the environment and we hope CCS will be the answer to that,” explained a UK spokesman for the German company.

Protests by environmentalists over E.ON’s plans to build a coal-fired power station at Kingsnorth have encouraged Ed Miliband, the secretary of state for energy and climate change, to rule that there should be no plants in the UK without some degree of CCS, with the remainder of any plant having CCS fitted within five years of it being judged “technically and economically proven”.

The WWF believes the 50 coal schemes in total around Europe represent about 50 gigawatts of power. That compares with the 70GW of total power produced in Britain from all existing sources, including gas, nuclear and a small but growing contribution from wind.

New coal stations are being planned in big numbers in the US and China but the EU has been arguing that all countries should proceed only if they use CCS to turn them into “clean” coal projects.

The EU is committed to cutting carbon emissions by at least 20% by the year 2020 and 80% by 2050 and wants all nations to agree tough new targets at Copenhagen.

The concept of CCS is considered vital to the fight against global warming.

But question marks remain about whether the feasibility of doing it at large scale and at a cost that makes it work, leaving Belchatow and others belching on.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Staff occupy Isle of Wight wind turbine plant

Workers staged an occupation of one of Britain’s only wind turbine factories last night to protest against the imminent closure of the plant and the loss of hundreds of jobs.

About 25 workers entered the administration block of the Vestas Wind Systems factory in Newport, Isle of Wight, at around 7.30pm and vowed to remain there until the government discusses their proposal to save it from closure by nationalising the plant.

In April the Danish firm announced that the factory, which employs 525 people, as well as another in Southampton, employing 100 people, would close because of a lack of demand.

Vestas, which is the world’s biggest wind energy group and recently reported a quarterly sales rise of 59%, up to €1.1bn (£0.95bn), cited a slowdown in demand when it announced the closure of the factory. It blamed a number of factors including the weakness of the pound and “a lack of political initiatives”.

Vestas chief executive Ditlev Engel said that building wind turbines in Britain was “extremely time-consuming and extremely complicated”. He added: “In the UK nimbyism is a huge challenge.”

A worker inside the factory, who gave his name only as Michael, hit out at what he claimed were double standards in the government’s approach to low-carbon industries.

He said: “It’s crazy for Ed Miliband [the environment secretary] to be making statement after statement about green energy and green jobs and at the same time this factory is being closed.”

“It would be tiny step financially to keep this factory open, but it would be a huge statement about the government’s commitment to the green economy. Just as they could not afford to let the banks fail, they can’t afford to let this fail. It’s about the history of humanity.”

Several police officers gathered outside the factory last night but told the protesters they do not intend to force them out. “This is a peaceful protest,” Michael said. “We got enough supplies to last a while … as long as you like crisps.”

A spokesman for the Campaign Against Climate Change pressure group said: “We give the workers our full support. The government should take over the plant and restart production and if there currently is not enough demand for wind turbines, then it should build more wind farms itself.”

No one from Vestas management was available for comment last night.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Guardian Daily: Revolution in green

Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, has set out the government’s plans to move Britain towards a low-carbon economy and meet the UK’s ambitious climate change targets. The environment editor, John Vidal, says it is a historic shift away from fossil fuels, but may not be enough to avert the ravages of global warming.

The jobless total is at its highest since 1995, according to the latest official figures. David Blanchflower, until May a member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, which sets interest rates, says the government must act to reduce unemployment and ignore calls to cut spending.

Robert Tait looks at evidence that the number of protesters killed in demonstrations over disputed election results in Iran may be much higher than authorities say.

France has passed a new law liberalising Sunday trading. Angelique Chrisafis reports from Paris on what it means for French shoppers, and for their country’s economy.

Lars Von Trier’s new film Antichrist, with its scenes of genital mutilation, has been vilified by critics as one of the sickest movies ever to get a general release. The Guardian’s Xan Brooks begs to differ.



Brucie and Motty on PM’s guest list

Statement shows which politicians, celebrities and journalists were entertained at the prime minister’s country residence

The entertainer Bruce Forsyth and the football commentator John Motson were among those who received official hospitality at Chequers over the last year, Gordon Brown revealed today.

Their names are included on a list of all those entertained at the prime minister’s country residence in 2008-2009, a ministerial statement showed.

The list – which includes a large number of politicians and journalists – always attracts considerable interest at Westminster, where it is seen as a guide to who belongs to the Brown social circle.

Embarrassingly for the prime minister, Sir Fred Goodwin, the bank boss blamed for the demise of RBS, was one of the City figures to enjoy the prime minister’s hospitality.

Downing Street did not say when guests were entertained at Downing Street, or whether they attended functions at Chequers, in Buckinghamshire, more than once.

Celebrities on the list include the showbiz stars Matt Lucas, David Walliams and Davina McCall, the author John O’Farrell, the singer Lesley Garrett, the actors Alan Rickman, Emma Thompson and Greg Wise and the runner Dame Kelly Holmes.

The former poet laureate Sir Andrew Motion and the former children’s laureate Michael Rosen were also guests.

Senior ministers invited to join Brown included Ed Balls and his wife, Yvette Cooper, Nick Brown, Liam Byrne, Alistair Darling, Lord Drayson, Harriet Harman, Tessa Jowell, Ed Miliband, Lord Myners, Lord West and Shaun Woodward

Sir Menzies Campbell, the former Liberal Democrat leader and a long-time friend of Brown from Scotland, was invited there, as was his wife, Lady Elspeth.

Journalists on the list include ITN’s Tom Bradby, Sky’s Kay Burley, GMTV’s Gloria de Piero, the Spectator’s Matthew d’Ancona, Will Lewis, Patrick Hennessy, Andrew Porter and Benedict Brogan, of Telegraph newspapers, Katharine Viner and Jonathan Freedland from the Guardian, Philip Webster from the Times, the Mirror’s Kevin Maguire, the Sun’s George Pascoe Watson and the Observer editor John Mulholland.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



Labour orders green energy revolution

Miliband takes control of power grid and lays out plan for low-carbon UK

The government seized control of key levers in the energy sector today in an attempt to kickstart a stalling “green energy” revolution and head off the threats of global warming and a rundown in North Sea oil.

Ministers plan to take over the allocation of electricity grid connections in order to favour renewable schemes, force the industry regulator, Ofgem, to tackle carbon pollution and pass laws to compel power companies to help poorer families meet rising energy bills.

The moves came as Ed Miliband, energy and climate change secretary, set out an ambitious road map for the UK to meet its legally binding target of a 34% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. Measures range across homes, cars, business and farming, but clean electricity generation will deliver half the reduction.

Miliband said Britain would meet 40% of its electricity needs from wind, tidal and nuclear by the end of the next decade. The government’s overall plans believe 1.2m new green jobs will be created.

“Our plan will strengthen our energy security, it seeks to be fair to the most vulnerable, it seizes industrial opportunity and it rises to the moral challenge of climate change,” he said.

The government said £100bn had to be spent on energy projects and accepted that customers’ bills would have to rise to pay for much of it.

But Miliband said domestic energy saving initiatives should mean there would be no related hikes in utility bills until 2015 and by 2020 should mean on average 6% – £75 – a year on domestic bills. The decision to significantly strengthen government control of the planning and infrastructure of the energy markets in a bid to increase renewable power sixfold turns back some of the market-driven approach developed by Margaret Thatcher.

Lord Mandelson, business secretary, said: “We must combine the dynamism of the private sector with a strategic role for government to deliver the benefits of innovation, growth and job creation in the UK.”

The developments have delighted a clean energy sector frustrated by long delays to win access to the national electricity grid. “The renewables industry has had a tough time in the UK for many years and it has missed out on technologies where it should have led the world. What we heard … today shows a level of understanding and political leadership that suggests that may be about to change,” said Gaynor Hartnell, director of policy at the Renewable Energy Association.

Friends of the Earth also welcomed the moves. “Today’s announcements are a significant step towards the creation of a safe, clean and low-carbon future,” said Andy Atkins, executive director.

But some of the large power companies which want to build nuclear and coal plants as well as wind farms still felt the government was not doing enough. “The government has to give companies such as E.ON a market that also gives them confidence to build Britain’s low carbon future,” said Paul Golby, chief executive of E.ON UK, which is pushing to build a coal-fired plant at Kingsnorth but is also engaged in the world’s biggest wind farm, the London Array off the coast of Kent.

Ofgem denied it had been found wanting by the government. “We don’t see this as a kick in the teeth. We have been working under our existing powers to make changes to the grid access regime without much success. So [we] welcome the government stepping in,” said an Ofgem spokesman, who also said it was happy to take on a greener role.

Miliband said he was exercising reserve powers provided under the 2008 Energy Act for the government to intervene. He expects wind and other renewables to provide “over 30%” of the renewable power for electricity by 2020 but denied this was rowing back on a previous commitment to obtain 32%.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Miliband takes the greener path

A new low-carbon road map sets the government on the right track on emissions reduction – now we should all do our bit

For the last two years the “transition movement” has been a grassroots effort by thousands of ordinary people determined to begin the transformation towards a low-carbon lifestyle. Today it became government policy. Not for nothing is Ed Miliband’s green road map called the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan. No longer are towns and villages like Transition Lewes – or my own community effort, Low Carbon Wolvercote – on their own. Their demand – to be part of the low-carbon solution, rather than the problem – has been adopted wholesale by government.

Since the Climate Change Act was passed last year, the UK has theoretically been committed to an 80% reduction in carbon emissions by 2050. But that act was only half the battle won: the government still seemed to lack a strategic plan to actually meet the targets. Indeed, many government policies – on building roads, expanding airports and so on – seemed to take us in the wrong direction.

Miliband’s white paper changes all that: the emissions reductions from each sector of the economy are quantified, and the policies to make them a reality spelt out. The paper sets out, for example, how each government department will be expected to stay within its carbon budget, outlines plans for a five-fold expansion of renewable electricity generation by 2020, increases the commitment to a new generation of nuclear power stations and brings forward measures to speed up the introduction of electric cars. There are three carbon budgets now in planning, each covering a five-year period, and running up until 2022, by which time emissions should have been reduced by a third from 1990 levels.

The plan isn’t perfect, but it should give a new dynamism to the UK’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions – something that has been sorely lacking until now. As if to illustrate the new sense of urgency, the Department for Energy and Climate Change has pledged to reduce its own emissions by a remarkable 10% by the end of 2010. The budgets are important in particular because they are legally binding: indeed, the UK is the first country in the world to enshrine its carbon targets in law.

There are plenty of areas of controversy. Wind power remains controversial, and a massive expansion of onshore wind can be expected to meet with major opposition – not least from Tories in the shires. Plans for a Severn Barrage are also being narrowed down, much to the concern of conservationists worried about the local ecological impacts. Nuclear is a perennially thorny issue. But all these areas will benefit from a streamlining of the planning system, which aims to speed up new-build projects of national significance.

Another plus point is that the government plans to eschew carbon offsets from abroad, making all the cuts domestically – at least in the first five years. (This doesn’t include big corporate emitters, which can already buy and sell credits within Europe via the EU emissions trading scheme.) The plan also has a strong emphasis on one of the less sexy areas of emissions reduction: from the farming sector, where fertiliser use, land management and livestock add up to 7% of our national emissions.

Now it’s over to us. The original Transition movement provided a DIY action plan for how we could all – as individuals, communities and regions – do our fair share while the government dawdled. Now the government has weighed in with a sensible national strategy, there can be no excuses about “waiting for the politicians to act”. We are all responsible for reducing the threat our lifestyles pose to life on Earth – and we have to start now.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Miliband unveils low-carbon strategy

The low-carbon transition plan covers all sectors, from home insulation and generating power, to electric cars and high-speed trains

The government has unveiled detailed plans for transforming the UK to a low-carbon economy and meeting its targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The measures, which touch on all aspects of life, from home insulation and power generation to electric cars and high-speed trains, are designed to achieve emissions cuts of 34% by 2020 compared with 1990 levels.

Under the plans, which are projected to create 1.2m “green jobs”, every government department will be required to meet a carbon budget alongside its financial budget. The announcement is the first time the government has laid out in detail where the carbon axe will fall and how much each department will be expected to cut.

Miliband warned, however, that domestic energy prices would rise in 2020 to pay for some of the required changes. He hoped this would be offset with energy efficiency savings in 7m homes and financial help for the poorest consumers.

“The proposals published today are the first time we have set out a comprehensive plan for carbon across every sector – energy, homes, transport, agriculture and business,” said Miliband. “Our transition plan is a route map to 2020. It strengthens our energy security, it seeks to be fair in the decisions we make, above all it rises to the moral challenge of climate change.”

In the government’s white paper on energy and climate, called the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan and published today, half of the proposed carbon cuts to 2020 would come from changes to the power sector, 15% from making homes more efficient, 10% from workplace improvements, 20% from changing how we travel and 5% from agriculture and land use.

This means that 40% of UK electricity by 2020 will come from low-carbon sources including renewables, nuclear and clean coal. The white paper also launches consultation on the details of the government’s feed-in tariff, re-named the “clean energy cash-back” scheme, which will pay people and businesses a premium for generating low-carbon electricity. A similar scheme for renewable heat will follow in April 2011.

The white paper details plans for a “pay as you save” scheme for homeowners to receive loans to insulate their homes, with money repaid by savings in energy costs.

Philip Sellwood, chief executive of the Energy Saving Trust welcomed the scheme. “People tell us that the biggest barrier that stops them from making their homes more energy efficient is the need to find money to pay for the up-front costs. Our research shows that householders are more likely to make larger investments, including micro-generation and solid-wall insulation, if the costs can be spread through the savings they make on their energy bills.”

Other measures in the white paper and the industrial and transport strategies, also published today, include:

• Up to £6m to start development of a “smart grid”, including a policy road map next year.

• Launch of the new Office for Renewable Energy Deployment in the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) to speed up the growth of renewables in the UK.

• DECC to take direct responsibility from Ofgem for establishing a new grid access regime within 12 months.

• Up to £180m would be made available to promote wind and tidal power – this includes setting up a low-carbon economic area in the south-west to promote marine technologies and money for up to 3,000 wind turbines off the UK’s shores by 2020.

• £15m to establish a Nuclear Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre that will develop the next generation of nuclear power infrastructure.

• £10 million will go to improving infrastructure for charging electric vehicles.

• Challenging 15 villages, towns or cities to be test-beds for piloting future green initiatives.

The shadow energy secretary Greg Clark welcomed the white paper, which he said was familiar since much of it borrowed from Conservative policy. “Over 12 years we have had 15 energy ministers, but no energy policy. Does [Miliband] recognise that while other countries have spent the last decade diversifying their supplies of energy, Britain has become even more dependent on imported fossil fuels – threatening our energy security, our economic competitiveness, and our climate change objectives?”

He added: “The secretary of state stands in a position of great moment. He must decide whether he breaks with the past and implements rigorously the measures that both he and I know are needed, or whether the next six months will prove, like the last 12 years, to have been a time of opportunity lost.”

John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace, said: “If this plan becomes a reality, it will create hundreds of thousands of green jobs and make Britain a safer and more prosperous country. This will be good for the British economy and, in the long-run, save householders money as we reduce our dependence on foreign oil and gas. Ed Miliband appears to be winning important battles in Whitehall. But it’s crucial that these plans now get full cross-party support and more backing from the chancellor. The renewable energy industry is too important to become a political football and this strategy for green jobs deserves more than the current paltry sums being offered by the Treasury.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Miliband outlines climate policies

Forty per cent of electricity will come from low carbon sources of renewables, nuclear and clean coal by the end of the next decade, says energy secretary

Tackling climate change will require “comprehensive changes” in the UK’s economy and society, energy secretary Ed Miliband said today as he unveiled plans to slash emissions from power, transport, agriculture and industry.

Laying out how the UK would meet its legally binding targets to cut emissions by 34% by 2020, he said 40% of electricity would come from low carbon sources including renewables, nuclear and clean coal by the end of the next decade.

Ministers were today publishing measures on how they propose to shift the UK to a low carbon economy, including a green transport strategy, energy efficiency measures and attempts to boost the number of environmental industry jobs.

Miliband told MPs that seven million homes would be given pay-as-you-save energy makeovers, with grants which would paid back through savings in energy bills.

And 1.5m households would be supported to produce their own clean energy through a “feed-in tariffs” system which will pay them for the electricity they generate, he said.

Ministers will also set out measures on low-carbon transport and for ensuring that the UK benefits from thousands of potential “green jobs” as they publish the UK low carbon transition plan white paper.

But the government has come under fire for the impact of increasing renewables in the energy mix could have on people’s fuel bills in the future.

The UK has committed to the world’s first legally binding “carbon budgets”, which require a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 34% by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050, and a EU target of meeting 15% of all energy needs from renewables by 2020.

Measures to meet the goals will cover a wide range of sectors including power, transport, homes, workplaces and agriculture.

Among the schemes to reduce climate emissions to be launched today will be a “pay as you save” programme for homeowners to receive loans to insulate their homes, with the money repaid from savings on energy bills.

And people who install small-scale renewables such as solar panels or wind turbines will be paid, through a “feed-in tariffs” programme, for the electricity they generate.

There are also plans to increase large-scale renewable energy and in particular wind — with proposals for some 4,000 new onshore turbines and a further 3,000 offshore.

The government’s consultation on renewable energy last year estimated meeting targets to increase green power could lead to a rise in fuel bills of almost £230 a year by the end of the next decade.

But officials say revised estimates will show the costs of a switch to green energy will be lower than that.

Ahead of the publication of a renewable energy strategy launched alongside the white paper today, the energy and climate change secretary, Ed Miliband, warned there would be “upward pressures” on prices whatever the energy mix.

Miliband said today’s document set out a “route map” towards achieving the 2020 targets for CO2 cuts, which he said could generate 400,000 new “green” jobs by 2015.

He acknowledged that low-carbon energy would be more expensive for consumers, but pointed out that high-carbon fuels like coal and gas could also be expected to get more expensive because of increased demand from China and India.

He told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme: “What we are trying to do is to set out not simply targets for 2020 – which have been set – but a route map to get there: How we are going to take the carbon dioxide out of the way we travel, our homes and the way we provide energy.”

Continuing on the high-carbon route would force the UK to import more fossil fuels, leaving the country exposed to oil price fluctuations and conflict elsewhere in the world, while there would also be costs in shifting to a low-carbon energy mix, he said.

The Tories accused ministers of failing to address the looming energy crunch over the past 12 years, leading to a “vacuum where there should have been an energy policy”.

Householders faced rising bills as the UK became increasingly reliant on costly imported gas, because it had one of the lowest renewable sectors in Europe and some of the least energy efficient buildings, shadow energy secretary Greg Clark warned.

“The scramble to catch up with the rest of Europe will now be more costly than if action to reduce reliance on oil and gas had been taken in a planned way over the last ten years,” he said.

Environmentalists remain concerned about the ambition of the white paper, which lays out how the UK will meet the targets for emissions cuts recommended by the Committe on Climate Change and made legally binding by the Climate Change Act.

While the committee, set up to advise ministers on cutting emissions, recommended almost entirely de-carbonising the electricity sector by 2030, green campaigners fear the government will not go nearly as far as that.

Alongside renewables, new nuclear build and new coal fired power stations – as long as a proportion of any new plant is fitted with technology to capture and permanently store carbon emissions – will form part of the energy mix in the future.

Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said: “The government must prioritise renewable energy and energy efficiency over everything else in the sector. If they do this, Britain could lead the fight against climate change, whilst providing hundreds of thousands of jobs. Anything less would be a failure.

Other environmental campaigners said they were concerned that sufficient cuts would not be made in the UK, but “offset” by paying for reductions abroad.

One of the most controversial elements of plans to boost renewables in the UK are proposals for large-scale projects to harness the tidal power of the Severn estuary.

The government is expected to confirm a shortlist of five schemes for the Severn today, including proposals for multi-billion pound 10-mile barrage across the estuary.

As part of today’s announcement the government will also be publishing a transport carbon-reduction strategy.

The government has already announced several initiatives, including moves to make electric cars more affordable by providing help worth £2,000 to £5,000 towards buying the first electric and plug in hybrid cars when they hit the showrooms from 2011.

Last month the government announced eight new low-carbon vehicle projects were being launched with some of the schemes involving members of the public being invited to test out electric cars.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Miliband to launch renewables drive

Ed Miliband will today announce low carbon transition plan to meet CO2 targets while admitting that fuel bills may rise

The government will today outline plans for a major expansion in renewable energy as part of the strategy to slash the UK’s carbon emissions in the coming decade.

Ministers will also set out measures on low-carbon transport and for ensuring that the UK benefits from thousands of potential “green jobs” as they publish the UK low carbon transition plan white paper.

But the government has come under fire for the impact of increasing renewables in the energy mix could have on people’s fuel bills in the future.

The UK has committed to the world’s first legally binding “carbon budgets”, which require a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 34% by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050, and a EU target of meeting 15% of all energy needs from renewables by 2020.

Measures to meet the goals will cover a wide range of sectors including power, transport, homes, workplaces and agriculture.

Among the schemes to reduce climate emissions to be launched today will be a “pay as you save” programme for homeowners to receive loans to insulate their homes, with the money repaid from savings on energy bills.

And people who install small-scale renewables such as solar panels or wind turbines will be paid, through a “feed-in tariffs” programme, for the electricity they generate.

There are also plans to increase large-scale renewable energy and in particular wind — with proposals for some 4,000 new onshore turbines and a further 3,000 offshore.

The government’s consultation on renewable energy last year estimated meeting targets to increase green power could lead to a rise in fuel bills of almost £230 a year by the end of the next decade.

But officials say revised estimates will show the costs of a switch to green energy will be lower than that.

Ahead of the publication of a renewable energy strategy launched alongside the white paper today, the energy and climate change secretary, Ed Miliband, warned there would be “upward pressures” on prices whatever the energy mix.

Miliband said today’s document set out a “route map” towards achieving the 2020 targets for CO2 cuts, which he said could generate 400,000 new “green” jobs by 2015.

He acknowledged that low-carbon energy would be more expensive for consumers, but pointed out that high-carbon fuels like coal and gas could also be expected to get more expensive because of increased demand from China and India.

He told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme: “What we are trying to do is to set out not simply targets for 2020 – which have been set – but a route map to get there: How we are going to take the carbon dioxide out of the way we travel, our homes and the way we provide energy.”

Continuing on the high-carbon route would force the UK to import more fossil fuels, leaving the country exposed to oil price fluctuations and conflict elsewhere in the world, while there would also be costs in shifting to a low-carbon energy mix, he said.

The Tories accused ministers of failing to address the looming energy crunch over the past 12 years, leading to a “vacuum where there should have been an energy policy”.

Householders faced rising bills as the UK became increasingly reliant on costly imported gas, because it had one of the lowest renewable sectors in Europe and some of the least energy efficient buildings, shadow energy secretary Greg Clark warned.

“The scramble to catch up with the rest of Europe will now be more costly than if action to reduce reliance on oil and gas had been taken in a planned way over the last ten years,” he said.

Environmentalists remain concerned about the ambition of the white paper, which lays out how the UK will meet the targets for emissions cuts recommended by the Committe on Climate Change and made legally binding by the Climate Change Act.

While the committee, set up to advise ministers on cutting emissions, recommended almost entirely de-carbonising the electricity sector by 2030, green campaigners fear the government will not go nearly as far as that.

Alongside renewables, new nuclear build and new coal fired power stations – as long as a proportion of any new plant is fitted with technology to capture and permanently store carbon emissions – will form part of the energy mix in the future.

Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said: “The government must prioritise renewable energy and energy efficiency over everything else in the sector. If they do this, Britain could lead the fight against climate change, whilst providing hundreds of thousands of jobs. Anything less would be a failure.

Other environmental campaigners said they were concerned that sufficient cuts would not be made in the UK, but “offset” by paying for reductions abroad.

One of the most controversial elements of plans to boost renewables in the UK are proposals for large-scale projects to harness the tidal power of the Severn estuary.

The government is expected to confirm a shortlist of five schemes for the Severn today, including proposals for multi-billion pound 10-mile barrage across the estuary.

As part of today’s announcement the government will also be publishing a transport carbon-reduction strategy.

The government has already announced several initiatives, including moves to make electric cars more affordable by providing help worth £2,000 to £5,000 towards buying the first electric and plug in hybrid cars when they hit the showrooms from 2011.

Last month the government announced eight new low-carbon vehicle projects were being launched with some of the schemes involving members of the public being invited to test out electric cars.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


We will protect air travel – Miliband

Mass air travel will be preserved even in a low-carbon Britain because the government will find deeper emissions cuts in other areas, the climate change secretary Ed Miliband said today.

Dismissing demands for punitive sanctions to curb flying, Miliband said the government was determined to ensure that airline travel remains affordable for ordinary people.

In a Guardian interview, ahead of the publication of a white paper on climate change, Miliband said air travel would become more expensive as Britain tries to meet a G8 target to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 80% by 2050. But he said it would be wrong to impose the target on airlines, which will be covered by the European Emissions Trading Scheme from 2012 if they fly to and from the EU.

“Where I disagree with other people on aviation is if you did 80% cuts across the board, as some people have called for on aviation, you would go back to 1974 levels of flying,” he said. “I don’t want to have a situation where only rich people can afford to fly.”

Miliband spoke of the importance of flying for his constituents in Doncaster which has benefited after an RAF airbase was turned into an international airport in 2005. “People in my constituency have benefited from being able to have foreign travel which, 40 years ago, the middle classes took for granted,” he said. “There are sacrifices and changes in lifestyle necessary. But the job of government is to facilitate them and understand people’s lives and what they value.”

The pledge by Miliband echoes remarks by Tony Blair in 2007 who said it would be wrong to impose “unrealistic targets” on airline travellers. Britain has pledged to bring its aviation emissions down to 2005 levels by 2050.

Miliband’s remarks are designed to illustrate the government’s overall approach to meeting the 2050 target which will not involve imposing a blanket 80% cut on all areas of the economy. The white paper is expected to build on government plans to tolerate relatively high emissions in one area if action is taken in other areas by, for example, lagging lofts and driving less. Carbon levels have already been brought down from 1990 levels, the benchmark for global climate talks. So far they have been reduced by 22% and are due to come down by 34% by 2020, with a target of at least 80% due in 2050.

The government has already announced that will be achieved by dividing the economy into a series of sectors. The biggest is power, with others including transport, homes, work places and agriculture.

Miliband will outline on Wednesday how much carbon Britain is emitting in each area and will suggest steps to bring them down. He refused to outline the details of his white paper out of respect to John Bercow, the new Commons speaker, who has demanded ministers make announcements first to parliament. But he said his philosophy is to outline a vision of “green hope” – with jobs in green technology and a safer country – not “green despair”.

“If Martin Luther King had come along and said ‘I have a nightmare’ people would not have followed him,” Miliband said, quoting someone he met at the Guardian’s recent Manchester climate change summit. “You have to persuade people that, yes, there are costs of not acting but also there is a vision of society at the end of this: more secure, more prosperous, fairer better quality of life. All those things are crucial to persuade people to take the leap.

“All our research indicates that people in Britain are not climate change deniers. But now they are persuaded it is a problem, you have to start offering them a vision about how you tackle the problem.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds