RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Ed Richards’

Broadband rates ‘not up to speed’

By Jason Palmer
Science and technology reporter, BBC News

Copper wire (SPL)

Broadband users are not getting the speeds they are paying for, according to the largest survey of its kind ever undertaken by telecoms regulator Ofcom.

Nearly one fifth of UK broadband customers on an eight Megabit per second (Mbps) connection actually receive less than 2Mbps, it found.

The research showed that less than 9% of users received more than 6Mbps.

However, the report shows that average connection speed across the UK is 4.1Mbps, up from 3.6Mbps in January.

"It’s very easy to go out and find out what the price of broadband is, but much more difficult to get a good understanding of what the observed speeds are likely to be," said Ofcom chief executive Ed Richards.

The report also ranked the average speeds of nine major UK ISPs, with Virgin Media coming out on top.

‘Slow lane’

In order to address the issue of speed, Ofcom worked with Samknows, a broadband measurement firm that specially modified the routers that decode the signal coming into subscribers’ homes.

While many websites offer speed tests, their results can vary widely due to a number of factors aside from the ISP’s speed; the routers measure the ISP’s delivered speed regardless of these factors.

The routers collected speed data from 1,600 users’ connections nationwide between November 2008 and April of this year – amounting to some 60 million separate speed tests in all.

The numbers were then adjusted for a given user’s distance from the telephone exchange. For broadband that comes through traditional copper wires, such as ADSL, the measured speed is lower for users who are farther from one of the country’s 5,800 exchanges.

The speed study was accompanied by a survey of subscribers, finding that although more than 80% were satisfied overall with their service, about a quarter said the network speed was not as fast as they had expected.

Because the measured speeds varied so much, a simple league table of ISP speeds is difficult to make.

However, Ofcom released a table which shows comparisons for nine major ISPs, showing which are faster and slower.

"The Ofcom study is important as it quantifies accurately for the first time what consumers have known for a long while – namely that you are extremely unlikely to receive the advertised broadband speed," said Charlie Ponsonby, chief executive of broadband comparison site Simplifydigital.

"Also for the first time it makes a robust, like-for-like comparison between broadband providers."

However, BT, who ranked lower in the survey, criticised the report.

It said the sample size was too small and the results were "unreliable".

In particular, it said that because it provided rural broadband its average speed was bound to be slower than other ISPs.

"We have many customers whose lines are at the limit of broadband service, with resulting lower average speeds," it said in a statement.

Investment

Ofcom’s strategy and markets developments partner Peter Phillips stressed that the two major contributors to the measured speeds from a given provider were the type of technology that they employed, and the number of subscribers on that provider’s network.

Typically, broadband provided by a cable connection outpaced that provided by copper wire-based ADSL.

However, the number of users on a given network played a strong role, so that a first-generation ADSL network with little traffic could record higher speeds than a newer, ostensibly faster ADSL2+ network.

"It is critical that people are told when they’re new customers what speeds they can reasonably expect"

Peter Phillips
Ofcom

But Mr Phillips said that this makes the broadband market a dynamic one.

"The broadband market is continuing to evolve as ISPs invest in their networks, driven by consumers’ demand for faster and better broadband," he said. "Those that are investing more are clearly delivering a better service."

Ofcom admitted that it would need to carry out such tests again in order to reflect the changing infrastructure and subscriber base, but a spokesman told BBC News that Ofcom currently had no plans to launch another study.

For now, the watchdog is looking into assessing the degree to which customers are aware of what they are buying when shopping for an ISP.

Of the UK’s nearly 200 ISPs, 50 – comprising 95% of the UK’s broadband subscribers – have signed up to Ofcom’s voluntary code of practice.

The agreement encourages ISPs to disclose more than just the "maximum possible" speeds to prospective customers.

"It is critical that people are told when they’re new customers what speeds they can reasonably expect," said Mr Phillips.

Ofcom is currently undertaking a nationwide "mystery shopping" exercise, approaching ISPs as potential customers and assessing whether they quote reasonable speeds.

Results of the study are due out in the next few months.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Guardian editor calls for local news funding

Alan Rusbridger, the Guardian’s editor in chief, tonight threw his support behind a plan to give public funding to Britain’s national press agency to allow it to provide news from public authorities and courts as local newspapers withdraw because they can no longer afford it.

Rusbridger, speaking at a seminar on the future of journalism at the Media Standards Trust in London, also outlined his vision for a new digital world in which the public grows much closer to journalists.

Speaking in front of guests including film director Lord Puttnam, BBC business editor Robert Peston and Ofcom chief executive Ed Richards, Rusbridger said local news needed to be supported, or “corruption and inefficiency” would grow as scrutiny lessened.

He said the Press Association, in which most of the big British media firms including the Guardian Media Group are shareholders, should be the recipient of public money to provide local news as other providers such as newspapers and ITV regional news disappear.

In return, PA would contract out the reporting of public authorities and courts to local papers, with the content then shared with other outlets.

PA is currently looking for funding to trial the idea.

Rusbridger said the gradual disappearance of local journalism worried him.

“This bit of journalism is going to have to be done by somebody,” Rusbridger said. “It makes me worry about all of those public authorities and courts which will in future operate without any kind of systematic public scrutiny. I don’t think our legislators have begun to wake up to this imminent problem as we face the collapse of the infrastructure of local news in the press and broadcasting.”

Rusbridger said local public service journalism was a “kind of utility” which was just as important as gas and water.

“We must face up to the fact that if there is no public subsidy, then some of this [public service] reporting will come to pass in this country,” he said.

“The need is there. It is going to be needed pretty quickly.”

Rusbridger also laid out his vision of what he called “mutualised news,” which he said would “take down the walls” of traditional media companies by distributing information through new means such as social networking site Twitter and by asking the public to get involved through experiments such as “crowd sourcing”, used by the Guardian to help with its investigation into the death of Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests.

“It was a piece of conventional reporting and tapping into the resources of a crowd,” he said. “There are thousands of reporters in any crowd nowadays. There was nothing to stop people from publishing those pictures but it needed the apparatus of a mainstream news organisation for that to cut through and have impact.”

He added: “What I like about idea of mutualised news is it gets over the concept of us versus them. It is us and them. It blurs the line between journalists and reader. It is much more diverse and plural than a conventional newspaper. It gives us a huge extensive resource.”

Rusbridger denied it would be the end of conventional journalism, saying that trained journalists and the public could work together, adding it was “futile” to deny that “something interesting and exciting is going on here.”

“There are many things that mainstream media do which in collaboration with others is still really important. The ability to take a large audience and amplify things and to give more weight to what would [otherwise] be fragments. Somebody has to have the job of pulling it all together.”

Rusbridger admitted that he had originally dismissed Twitter as “silly” but now saw its huge benefits for media companies in building communities and distributing news. “When Twitter started, I confess, I didn’t get it. Sometimes you are too old to keep up with all these things and Twitter just seemed silly and I didn’t have time to add it to all of these other things, but that was completely wrong.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds