Like every other aspect of the corporate world is bound by certain set of ethics and etiquettes that need to be followed, the recruitment fraternity has also come up with a few recruiting ethics and etiquettes that recruiters, HR managers recruitment business owners and even job seekers should to adhere to.
Posts Tagged ‘Ethics’
Infosys mentor calls for IT sector professionalism, ethics in Bangalore
Information Technology (IT) giant Infosys chairman N.R. Narayana Murthy on Friday reiterated his call for promoting professionalism and ethics in the competitive and complex IT sector. He was speaking at a round table conference organized by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET). Murthy, termed the need of professionalism and work ethics in the IT sector [...]
Chinese ethics: Scientists behaving badly
Recent events show China needs to clean up its scientific act
DISPUTES about science in Western countries can sometimes be heated. Seldom, though, do they descend into fisticuffs. But this is what seems to have happened in China on August 29th. That day Fang Shimin, a well-known scientific blogger and self-proclaimed “science cop”, was attacked in the street by a gang. Nor was this the first such incident. In June Fang Xuanchang (no relation), a science journalist on Caijing magazine, was on the receiving end of similar treatment.
So far, it might be thought by smug Westerners, so depressing. But then there was a twist in the tale. One of the objects of the two Fangs’ criticisms, Xiao Chuanguo, a urologist at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, was arrested and charged with organising the assaults. Even more extraordinary (or perhaps not, considering that he had been detained for seven days without access to a lawyer), he confessed his guilt on television, on September 28th. …
Ethics of P2P File Sharing: Should Free Movie Downloads be Banned? Posted By : Peter Nisbet
There are arguments for and against the legal use of P2P file sharing software to get free movie downloads online, and while it is true that downloading copyright-protected movies is and should be illegal, the situation is not as cut and dry as many believe it to be.
Jan. 15, 1929: Birth of a Moral Compass, Even for Science
1929: Martin Luther King Jr. is born. Though his work for civil rights and peace will become widely known, he will also deliver an important warning on the perils of technological amorality.
King delivered a lecture at the University of Oslo, Norway, on Dec. 11, 1964, the day after receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. He argued [...]
Palin Resigns Today, Future Clouded By Ethics Probes, Legal Bills, Dwindling Popularity
FAIRBANKS, Alaska — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin steps down Sunday giving few clues about her political future, which has been clouded by ethics probes, mounting legal bills and dwindling popularity.
A few things are known: She is scheduled …
Brad Friedman: Irony: Palin Used Official State Website for Private Rebuttal to Latest Ethics Complaint
Perhaps one more ethics complaint needs to be filed in Alaska before Palin quits her job as governor this weekend.
Palin Implicated In Ethics Probe
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — An independent investigator has found evidence that Gov. Sarah Palin may have violated ethics laws by accepting private donations to pay her legal debts.
The report obtained by The Associated Press says Palin is secu…
Right-to-die teenager changes mind on transplant
A critically ill teenage girl who refused to have a heart transplant against doctors’ advice has changed her mind and now wants to have the life-saving operation.
Hannah Jones, 14, from Marden, Herefordshire, who has been in and out of hospital since the age of four, said in November she did not want to go through the “trauma” of any more operations.
But she has now been asked to be placed on the waiting for a heart transplant, after doctors found she had grown stronger and said that the operation would be less risky than previously thought.
“I know I decided I definitely didn’t want this, but everyone’s entitled to change their mind,” Hannah said.
Her decision is likely to focus attention once again on a number of medical and ethical questions. Last year it was reported that health officials applied to remove her from her home because they believed her parents were preventing her treatment.
Her parents, Andrew and Kirsty Jones, said it was Hannah’s decision to refuse the treatment and that she was mature enough to understand the consequences. At the time Hannah, who was then thought to be terminally ill, convinced a child protection officer to argue for the abandonment of the court action.
Doctors had warned her that the operation was risky and that even if it succeeded, she would need another heart within 10 years. Now doctors believe she could make a full recovery.
“The right side of my heart isn’t beating at all and, after lots of tests, I realised there were more benefits to having a new heart to staying like I was,” she said.
“If I had a new heart, I’d be on less tablets than I am at the moment.”
She made her decision to go on the waiting list having suffered kidney failure after her 14th birthday party. Speaking from Hereford hospital, Hannah added: “I fell ill last Sunday but I just thought I’d overdone it on my birthday. Actually, it turned out it was my kidneys.” She could not go on dialysis because her heart was too weak.
A spokesman for NHS Herefordshire said: “Our paediatricians work closely with Hannah and her family to ensure she has the care and support she needs.”
“In our discussions with Hannah we are convinced she has the maturity and experience to make decisions for herself about her treatment and truly understands the implications.”
The trust denied it had tried to make her a ward of court last year in a bid to force her to undergo a heart transplant.
“No one can be or would ever be forced to undergo an operation if they do not wish it,” the spokesman said.
Mark Kirk Enters Senate Race, Looks To ‘Restore Ethics And Integrity To Illinois’
CHICAGO — Republican Congressman Mark Kirk is running for the U.S. Senate seat once held by President Barack Obama.
Kirk says Illinois has become a laughingstock since Democrat Roland Burris was appointed to the Senate seat by former Il…
House Ethics Committee Opens 15 New Cases Of Alleged Misconduct By Lawmakers
The House ethics committee has started investigating 15 new cases of alleged misconduct so far this year while probing 11 cases held over from last year, according to a new semi-annual report the panel released Friday.
Palin Report Overstates Costs Of Ethics Complaints: $30,000 An Hour Attorney?
There’s some double counting and other problems with a spreadsheet outlining $1.9 million in state costs for ethics complaints, public records requests and lawsuits directed at Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
Pope Benedict calls for new world order
• Global recession caused by greed, says pontiff
• Economic crisis is ‘clear proof of effects of sin’
Pope Benedict today pinned responsibility for the worldwide recession squarely on greed and an amoral fascination with technological progress for its own sake.
This must be tackled, he said, by the creation of a global political authority and financial order based not just on the search for ever greater profits, but on ethics and a sense of the common good.
The pontiff made the appeal in a 144-page encyclical – a reflection on doctrine that is the highest form of papal writing – three days before he was due to discuss the global downturn with Barack Obama.
Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth) is Benedict’s third encyclical and the first to deal exclusively with economic and social issues. In one section, he says the current economic crisis is “clear proof” of the “pernicious effects of sin”.
The pope’s analysis echoed some of the criticisms made by the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, of government policies that target growth to the exclusion of wider social considerations. But, as its title suggests, the papal encyclical is a primarily theological discourse which takes as its point of departure the argument that only a belief in the truth as proclaimed by Christianity can offer the necessary answers.
“A Christianity of charity without truth would be more or less interchangeable with a pool of good sentiments,” Benedict writes. His reflection – delayed by more than a year by the world economic crisis – nevertheless contains numerous specific criticisms and recommendations. Though the pontiff does not use the word “capitalism” in the encyclical, there are lengthy reflections on morality in economics.
In a key passage, the encyclical says: “The conviction that the economy must be autonomous, that it must be shielded from ‘influences’ of a moral character, has led man to abuse the economic process in a thoroughly destructive way. In the long term, these convictions have led to economic, social and political systems that trample upon personal and social freedom, and are therefore unable to deliver the justice that they promise.”
Then in an unequivocal critique of unbridled markets, the pope writes that “grave imbalances are produced when economic action, conceived merely as an engine for wealth creation, is detached from political action, conceived as a means for pursuing justice through redistribution.”
At a press conference in the Vatican, the pope’s technical consultant, Stefano Zamagni, an economics professor at the University of Bologna, denied the encyclical was anti-capitalist, but added that it “views capitalism in its historical dimension and goes beyond it”.
He noted that “the market economy is broader than just capitalism”, which was merely one variant. In another section of the reflection, Benedict argues that “financiers must rediscover the genuinely ethical foundation of their activity … right intention, transparency, and the search for positive results are mutually compatible and must never be detached from one another.”
Then, in a passage that builds on ideas first voiced by his predecessor, John Paul II, the pope argues that globalisation has made necessary a “reform of the United Nations Organisation and likewise of economic institutions and international finance so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth”.
One of his most senior advisers, cardinal Renato Martino, said: “The encyclical is not asking for a super- or world government.” But it comes very close to doing so. It proposes a “true world political authority” that “would need to be universally recognised and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice and respect for rights.” It would be asked to “manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis [and] to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis.”
But its responsibilities would be more than just economic. They would include securing “timely disarmament, food security and peace”. The new body, a reformed UN, would also be called upon “to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration”.
Often regarded as the first “green” pope, Benedict also took advantage of his encyclical to make clearer his ideas on the importance of respecting the environment. But Zamagni said the document implicitly rejected forms of environmental thinking that put other forms of creation on a par with humankind.
Let doctors pray for patients, BMA to be urged
British Medical Association conference to be told praying for patients should not be grounds for NHS disciplinary action
Doctors’ attempts to discuss spiritual affairs with patients or to offer prayers for them should not trigger NHS disciplinary action, the British Medical Association will be told this week.
The issue has been raised in a series of critical motions to be debated at the BMA’s conference in Liverpool during a session on medical ethics.
Concerns about what is professionally appropriate have been highlighted by the case of a nurse, Caroline Petrie from Weston-super-Mare, who was suspended after a patient complained she had offered to pray for her.
Her primary care trust later agreed she could continue to pray for patients as long as she asked them first if they had any spiritual needs.
Most of the BMA motions effectively support that position but insist spiritual discussions should not be grounds for disciplinary intervention by NHS managers.
The main motion, put forward by the BMA’s agenda committee, states that it “is concerned that … any discussion of spiritual matters with patients or colleagues could lead to disciplinary action”.
It adds: “Offering to pray for a patient should not be grounds for suspension.” Spiritual matters should be raised, it suggests, “with respect for the views and sensitivities of individuals”.
The area is currently subject to two distinct sets of guidelines, one set out by the General Medical Council (GMC) and the other by the Department of Health.
In Religion or Belief: A Practical Guide for the NHS, the department states: “Members of some religions … are expected to preach and to try to convert other people. In a workplace environment this can cause many problems, as non-religious people and those from other religions or beliefs could feel harassed and intimidated by this behaviour.
“To avoid misunderstandings and complaints, it should be made clear to everyone from the first day of training and/or employment, and regularly restated, that such behaviour, notwithstanding religious beliefs, could be construed as harassment under the disciplinary and grievance procedures.”
The GMC guidance is the one preferred in most of the motions before the BMA conference. It urges the department “to exercise some joined-up thinking so that while always respecting the views and sensitivities of others, there should be freedom of speech to have appropriate consensual discussions of spiritual matters within the NHS”.
Dr Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the BMA’s Council, said yesterday he was unaware of the issue intruding on the working lives of most doctors.
It was, he suggested, difficult to expand on the subject based on a few isolated cases. What was most important, he said, was good communication between patients and doctors.
Dr Vivienne Nathanson, director of professional activities at the BMA, said it was “hugely important that it’s done right and sensitively… [Doctors] want to know what they are allowed to do.”
A Department of Health spokesman yesterday said its document was a guide to encourage awareness for staff and patients.



