RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Family finances’

Over-65s to outnumber under-fives worldwide

US census bureau report highlights shift in global population that may bring social and economic changes worldwide

The world is about to cross a demographic landmark of huge social and economic importance, with the proportion of the global population 65 and over set to outnumber children under five for the first time.

A new report by the US census bureau highlights a huge shift towards not just an ageing but an old population, with formidable consequences for rich and poor nations alike. The transformation carries with it challenges for families and policymakers, ranging from how to care for older people living alone to how to pay for unprecedented numbers of pensioners – more than 1 billion of them by 2040.

The report, An Ageing World: 2008, shows that within 10 years older people will outnumber children for the first time. It forecasts that over the next 30 years the number of over-65s is expected to almost double, from 506 million in 2008 to 1.3 billion – a leap from 7% of the world’s population to 14%. Already, the number of people in the world 65 and over is increasing at an average of 870,000 each month.

The rate of growth will shoot up in the next couple of years, with both overall numbers and proportions of older people rising rapidly.

The shift is due to a combination of the time-delayed impact of high fertility levels after the second world war and more recent improvements in health that are bringing down death rates at older ages. Separate UN forecasts predict that the global population will top 9 billion by 2050.

The US census bureau has led the way in sounding the alarm over the changes. This is its ninth report drawing together data from around the globe since it first focused on the trend in 1987.

Its latest projections warn governments and international bodies the tipping point will present widespread challenges at every level of human organisation, starting with the structure of the family, which will be transformed as people live longer.

That will in turn bring new burdens on carers and social services providers, while patterns of work and retirement will similarly have huge implications for health services and pensions systems.

“People are living longer, and in some parts of the world, healthier lives,” the authors conclude. “This represents one of the crowning achievements of the last century but also a significant challenge as proportions of older people increase in most countries.”

Europe is the greyest continent, with 23 of the world’s 25 oldest countries. Such dominance of the regional league table will continue. By 2040, more than one in four Europeans are expected to be at least 65, and one in seven at least 75.

The UK comes in at number 19 in the list of the world’s oldest countries. Top of the pile is Japan, which recently supplanted Italy as the world’s oldest big country. Its life expectancy at birth – 82 years – is matched only by Singapore, though in western Europe, France, Sweden and Italy all have life expectancies of more than 80 years (in the UK it is 78.8).

The contrast in life expectancy between rich and poor nations remains glaring. The report shows that a person born in a developed country can expect to outlive his or her counterpart in the developing world by 14 years. Zimbabwe holds the unfortunate record for the lowest life expectancy, which has been cut to 40 through a combination of Aids, famine and dictatorship.

But an important finding of the report is that the wave of ageing that has until recently been considered a phenomenon of the developed world is fast encroaching on poorer countries too. More than 80% of the increase in older people in the year up to July 2008 was seen in developing countries.

By 2040, the poor world is projected to be home to more than 1 billion people aged 65 and over – fully 76% of the world total.

Ageing will put pressure on societies at all levels. One way of measuring that is to look at the older dependency ratio, or ODR, which acts as an indicator of the balance between working-age people and the older population that must be supported by them.

The ODR is the number of people aged 65 and over for every 100 people aged 20 to 64. It varies widely, from just six in Kenya and seven in Bangladesh, to 33 in Italy and also Japan. The UK has an ODR of 26, and the US has 21.

From that ratio, a number of profound challenges flow. Countries with a high ODR are already creaking under the burden of funding prolonged retirement for their older population. Life expectancy after retirement has already reached 21 years for French men and 26 years for French women.

Though retirement ages have begun to rise in developed countries, partly through inducements from governments to continue working, this still puts an extreme burden on public pensions funds.

Socially, too, there are intense pressures on individuals and families.

With women living on average seven years longer than men, more older women are living alone. Around half of all women 65 and over in Germany, Denmark and Slovakia are on their own, with all the consequent issues of loneliness and access to care that ensue.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


BT raises call prices again

12 million customers to be hit in October as call costs go up 34% since January

BT is putting up its prices for the second time this year, making calls 34% more expensive than they were six months ago.

The company put up the cost of calls in April and will do the same again at the beginning of October. From then, calls will be 5.25p per minute, up from 3.91p at the beginning of the year. The set-up fee – the cost of connecting a call – will rise to 9p. It was 6.85p in January.

The move will hit 12 million of BT’s 14 million customers. Only those on its Anytime package, which costs £4.95 a month, will not be affected.

The latest increases will come into effect on 1 October. Customers were told of the change in the magazine that BT sends out with its bills.

“We have been quite generous to customers over the years, offering things like free calls to 0845 and 0870 numbers. Telephony costs have come down,” a spokesman for BT said. “We advise customers to consider whether they would be better off moving to the Anytime calls package in order to avoid increases in daytime call prices and the set up fee. BT’s Unlimited Anytime Plan costs just £4.95 a month, or 17p a day, and includes all your UK calls and calls to 0870 and 0845 numbers at any time.”

BT’s latest price rises may be the final straw for customers who have also endured a line rental increase in April from £11.50 to £12.50 a month.

“Today’s price increase announcement isn’t likely to improve BT’s popularity in the eyes of cash strapped consumers,” said Steve Weller of price comparison website uswitch.com.

At the moment the Post Office is offering a plan that is nearly 17% cheaper than BT for day time calls and 13% cheaper for call set-up fees and includes evenings and weekends without a 12-month contract, he adds. Similarly TalkTalk is offering calls at 4.50p per minute.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Time to switch energy suppliers

Many of the 4.6m fixed-rate deals on gas and electricity are about to expire. That could add £100 to bills, warns Miles Brignall

Given the soaring temperatures this week, probably the last thing on your mind is your gas and electricity bills. But if your fixed-price tariff is about to expire, you need to start thinking about switching.

According to the industry regulator, Ofgem, around 4.6m households have fixed or capped price deals for gas and electricity.

They were particularly popular last year when prices were going up, or threatening to rise. But with a large number expiring in the next few weeks and months, consumers are being advised to think about their next move. Remember, it takes around six weeks to switch supplier.

Our table shows which fixed-price deals are about to end and when. In almost all cases, those who took out one of these products have done well – particularly as the collapse in wholesale prices has once again failed to feed through to consumers.

As with a fixed-rate mortgage, customers coming off these deals are automatically put on to the standard tariff, which, for typical gas and electricity consumers, will add an extra £100 a year to their bills.

The price comparison website uSwitch says the average fixed or capped energy deal, taken out in July last year, costs £1,045 a year, compared with the average standard plan which is now costing £1,145 a year.

However, it is perfectly possible to save this amount – and a bit more – by switching to a cheaper deal, which will almost certainly be one of the internet-based tariffs. Switching straight on to another fixed/capped deal may not be the best option.

“Without a doubt, those who fixed last year, avoiding the price hikes that hit other households, have done really well,” says Will Marples of uSwitch.com, who warns consumers not to accept a new fixed or capped deal from their supplier without doing their homework first.

“Online energy plans are offering consumers the lowest prices, but just 5% – 1.3m households – are signed up. I would urge anyone coming off a fixed plan in the near future to follow three simple steps to make sure they are getting a good deal: move to dual fuel, pay by direct debit and sign up to an online plan,” he says. A look at the switching websites will show you there are four companies – British Gas, npower, E.ON and ScottishPower – vying for your business with the cheapest internet deals. Which one is best for you will depend on whether you use more gas than electricity, and where you are in the country.

Incredibly, given that we have had national power companies for 20 years, electricity prices from the same company still vary enormously depending on postcode. For this reason it is worth going on to one of the accredited websites and inputting your details to find out which is cheapest in your area. British Gas (WebSaver 3) deliberately prices itself as cheapest for average users. But, if your consumption is either side of typical, you may find that npower’s Sign Online 15 is cheaper – although to get the maximum discount you must stay with npower for 12 months.

British Gas has the added promise that it will be 6% cheaper than its standard tariff – useful if prices ever come down again (as they should).

Joe Malinowski, owner of comparison and switching website TheEnergyShop.com, agrees the online tariffs are the way to go. He is keen on ScottishPower’s Online Energy Saver 5 deal.

“It’s the second cheapest, in five regions, and near-ish the top for everyone, bar those living in London and the south-east. It offers cheap prices and has the added benefit that it’s capped until June 2010. If you are in one of its target areas, it’s well-worth considering,” he says. • Energy firms were this week told to improve their handling of customer complaints after research showed fewer than a quarter of consumers were satisfied with the way their gripes were dealt with.

In a letter to the six biggest gas and electricity supplier the chief executive of energy regulator Ofgem, Alistair Buchanan, said he was “disappointed” with the low level of customer satisfaction in complaint handling and ordered improvements by the time the regulator looks at it again next year.

Ofgem named and shamed EDF Energy after checking whether it was properly recording all complaints. Even the best companies – E.ON and Scottish and Southern – left just 29% of customers happy, while the worst – npower – satisfied just 16% of its consumers.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Student loans frozen and fees to rise

Universities minister David Lammy says move is a reaction to tough economic climate

The government today announced that it is freezing student grants and loans and cutting financial support for trainee teachers, and increasing tuition fees.

Grants for poorer students and universal maintenance loans will be frozen for the first time since the system was introduced, while fees will increase by 2.04% to £3,290 a year. The loans for living costs will stay the same, but those given to cover fees will increase to meet the rise in charges.

Teacher training grants for postgraduates, which had been universally offered, are to be restricted to people from lower income homes. Those with household incomes above £34,000 will pay for the majority of the cost of their course through loans instead of grants, adding to the debt mountain for some new graduates.

The surprise announcement is a strong sign of increasing pressures on the public purse. It is understood the move is designed to free up cash to avoid a cut in the grant as student numbers increase.

The universities minister, David Lammy, said in a written ministerial statement to parliament: “In these difficult economic times, we are continuing to take difficult decisions in the interests of students, universities and taxpayers alike.

“We have therefore decided to maintain the current package of maintenance support for full-time students, reflecting the current low inflationary environment.”

A promise automatically to give university grants to students who previously received £30-a week study grants at school has been reversed and will now be means-tested. The changes apply to England alone and will come into force in September 2010.

The decision to raise tuition fees while freezing loans and grants will be attacked by students.

NUS president, Wes Streeting, said: “Students are already racking up thousands of pounds of debt. It appears that the inflation rate is being applied where it suits universities, but not where it will improve student support.

“In the context of the current recession, these real-terms cuts in student support will be felt in students’ pockets.”

Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, said: “This is a kick in the teeth for the thousands of people who have already applied to university. We should be doing all we can during these difficult times to make education and learning as accessible as possible.

“For all the prime minister’s warm words and promises that education would not become a victim of the recession, we are yet to see any actions to back up his rhetoric.”

The statement to parliament came hours after the government published figures revealing that the proportion of students from the poorest backgrounds is increasing. Some 21% of 18- to 21-year-olds taking degrees last year were from the poorest four socio-economic groups, compared with 18.1% the year before.

The government was last year forced to reduce the thresholds for household income to qualify for a partial grant from £60,000 to £50,000, after too many students qualified. The surge in student numbers and those applying from the poorest homes had left a £200m black hole in the student finance system.

Today’s announcement also includes the reversal of the decision to award grants automatically to students who qualified for the Educational Maintenance Allowance at school.

Lammy said: “In these difficult economic times, it is both fair and reasonable to expect that those students who see an improvement in their financial circumstances are assessed for student support, according to their need.

“We have therefore revised our plans for a guarantee of student support, and will offer students in receipt of EMA a clear quote of the student support they will receive if their circumstances are unchanged at the time they apply for higher education.”

David Willetts, the shadow universities minister, said: “Gordon Brown tried to increase support for students in his first week as prime minister and he’s been cutting it back ever since. Students from poorest families will be the victims.

“The government needs to get on with the fees review and look at ways to offer a better deal for poorer students. We haven’t put forward an alternative structure for student finance for this year. We say get on with the independent review of student finance.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds