RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Football’

What could Owen bring to United?

If he signs, Owen will come off the bench when United are failing to convert chances – like Kris Boyd at Rangers, only less so

The ballyhoo ignited by Michael Owen’s proposed move to Manchester United is – surely – out of proportion to the relatively minor importance of the player in the club’s plans. It is impossible to imagine he is seen as a replacement for Cristiano Ronaldo or Carlos Tevez, or compensation for missing out on Karim Benzema. It is much more probable that this freebie who will reportedly be offered a pay-as-you-play deal will serve as a cut-price successor to, say, Alan Smith or latter-day Louis Saha or, in the best-case scenario, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. In other words, United should still be expected to make far more significant signings this summer.

Even the glitzy brochure concocted by his agents acknowledged that Owen is no longer as fast as before, and towards the end of his sentence at Newcastle United he even appeared to have lost his other main selling point – the ability to convert one-on-ones. It seemed then that the only thing he could finish was the hatchet job on his reputation. A generous interpretation of the misses he committed against, for example, Portsmouth and which ultimately led his friend Alan Shearer to drop him for the decisive run-in, would attribute them to a lack of confidence. That, admittedly, ignores the fact that in his very first press conference as manager Shearer had done his utmost to embiggen the little man by declaring him a surefire starter but perhaps a couple of weeks was not enough time to fortify a spirit weakened by years of injury and frustration. Being embraced by Manchester United could prove much more stimulating.

Regaining his confidence and his prowess as a predator would, you imagine, not be sufficient to secure him a starting place. He does not have the speed to serve as a spearhead nor the dynamism to be an offensive fulcrum, nor even to pester tired defences in the way Tevez can. And – his sporadic flourishes ‘in the hole’ for Newcastle under Keegan notwithstanding – he is not creative or forceful enough to provide the presence or goals from midfield that United will miss with the departure of Ronaldo and the continued waning of Paul Scholes and Ryan Giggs. He does offer the experience and nous that Federico Macheda and Danny Welbeck currently lack but probably not enough to even replicate the role briefly played at Old Trafford by Henrik Larsson. The Owen-style of player is a near anachronism, that with which only the biggest clubs can afford to persist. Owen’s role at United will, if he signs, be to spring off the bench on occasions when United are creating chances but failing to convert them. He will be to United what Kris Boyd is to Rangers, only less so.

Which leaves the question as to who will the more significant recruits be? A midfielder/forward who can inject offensive menace and anarchy seems essential. No, not Joey Barton, rather someone such as Sergio Aguero, Franck Ribéry – though his heart seems set on Madrid – or even Arjen Robben, fitness and past snubs permitting. Antonio Valencia is a fine player, especially in a 4-4-2, but it is hard to envisage him, or Michael Carrick, Park Ji-sung, Anderson or Darren Fletcher, scoring as many goals as Ronaldo did. As things stand, even if Wayne Rooney shifts more towards the centre alongside Dimitar Berbatov, United suffer a shortage of goals. And, of course, the paucity of nimble conjurers that Barcelona exposed remains.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Owen on verge of shock United move

• 29-year-old could have medical today
• United hope striker can rebuild career with champions

Michael Owen is on the verge of an astonishing move to Manchester United to supply some of the goals that have been lost in the wake of Cristiano Ronaldo and Carlos Tevez leaving Old Trafford. Owen, recently linked with Stoke City and Hull City and written off in many quarters as a has-been, was holding talks with the Premier League champions and will complete one of the most unexpected transfers of the summer if he passes a stringent medical examination.

That is expected to take place today when, if everything goes according to plan, United hope to announce they are willing to take on a striker whose career had seemed to be in an irreversible tailspin. Owen is a free agent after coming to the end of his contract at Newcastle United and his stock has fallen so much over a dismal season that, until now, he has been linked only with clubs in the lower half of the Premier League table.

Owen even faced the ignominy this week of the Blackburn Rovers manager, Sam Allardyce, saying he would not try to sign him because the former Liverpool and Real Madrid player could not be guaranteed to play 30 games a season. Sir Alex Ferguson, however, appears to be untroubled by the forward’s various injury problems and is keen to reunite him with Wayne Rooney, his former strike partner for the England national team until Fabio Capello decided that Owen was no longer worthy of a place in the squad. Everton have been monitoring Owen’s potential availability but were informed that they had effectively been gazumped.

The transfer is likely to prompt a mixed reaction among United supporters given Owen’s past with Liverpool and, more pertinently, the fact that he has become recognised as a player on the wane.

Owen scored 30 times in 65 starts for Newcastle, but he cost them £41m in total when putting together his wages and his transfer fee, and was dropped by the club’s interim manager, Alan Shearer, during the run-in to their relegation. He has not scored since January and, as his reputation has plummeted, his representatives appeared to have had so little confidence in finding a major club that would be willing to sign him they produced a 32-page brochure to persuade prospective buyers that he was worth a punt.

Ferguson is unlikely to have needed a glossy supplement, however, to know all about Owen’s ability, having closely followed his career since the player was at school. Liverpool got in ahead of United after Ferguson could not arrange a deal with the player’s father, Terry, and sources close to the Old Trafford manager have indicated that he has always regarded Owen as one that got away.

Even so, it represents a significant gamble on the part of Ferguson given the way Owen, at 29, has become more synonymous with injuries and high wages than the goals that once made him one of the more feared strikers in European football. There have also been misgivings about Owen’s commitment to his professional life, with the Wigan chairman, Dave Whelan, recently questioning whether the player was spending too much time indulging his love of horse racing.

None of these concerns appears to have registered with Ferguson, though, as he contemplates rebuilding his frontline in the aftermath of Ronaldo’s £80m transfer to Real Madrid and the Manchester City-bound Tevez severing his ties with Old Trafford. Karim Benzema, the France international striker, has moved to Real Madrid and United have ruled out other attackers such as Samuel Eto’o and Franck Ribéry because of a long-term decision not to sign players aged 26 or older for large fees because of the way their potential sell-on transfer values would then drop.

United are so determined to keep to this rule that Dimitar Berbatov, who was 27 when he signed from Tottenham for £30m last September, has been described as the “last of his kind”, but Owen’s situation, as a free agent, means these restrictions do not apply. He is clearly intent on showing that he can still play at the highest level judging by his comments last week. “I’ve got skin thicker than 99.9% of the population and I have got used to it,” he said. “I’ll come back. I’ll play well and score goals once more.” Few could have imagined him doing so in a Manchester United shirt.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Brazil’s new golden boy

Kaka might steal all the headlines this summer, but Luis Fabiano has emerged from the Confederations Cup as one of the new stars of Brazilian football.  The Sevilla striker was the tournament top scorer with five goals, including his crucial brace in the final on Sunday that helped Brazil recoverKaka might steal all the headlines this summer, but Luis Fabiano has emerged from the Confederations Cup as one of the new stars of Brazilian football. The Sevilla striker was the tournament top scorer with five goals, including his crucial brace in the final on Sunday that helped Brazil recover

It’s Real or nothing, says Ribéry

• Chelsea and Manchester United set for another snub
• France midfielder intent on leaving Bayern Munich

Chelsea and Manchester United’s hopes of signing Franck Ribéry appear to be receding, with the France midfielder saying he wants to leave Bayern Munich and join Real Madrid.

Ribéry is quoted today in L’Equipe saying: “I have made up my mind, I want to leave. It will be Real or nothing. I will wait to see how things pan out but I would like to hold talks with the Bayern management soon.”

Chelsea had identified Ribéry as a possible headline signing but feared that his compatriot Zinedine Zidane, now a special adviser at Real, would use his influence to bring the 26-year-old to the Bernabéu.

Manchester United have also been linked with Ribéry although their new policy of signing only players under 26 had made Old Trafford a less likely destination.

Ribéry’s compatriot Karim Benzema has already agreed to join the Spanish side from Lyon and become Real’s third major signing of the summer after the arrivals of Kaka from Milan and Cristiano Ronaldo from United.

Bayern officials have repeatedly said Ribéry, who joined them in 2007 from Marseille, is not for sale. Their general manager Uli Hoeness does not believe Ribéry’s desire to leave alters their position. “Does Franck want to go to Real?” he asked. “For us, that changes absolutely anything. Life is not always a fairytale. Real have not made us a specific proposal and we do not need their money.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



Real Madrid seal £30m Benzema deal

• Lyon sell forward in deal which could be worth over £35m
• Cristiano Ronaldo has inauspicious first day at the club

Real Madrid’s extraordinary and relentless summer spending spree continued to send reverberations through the football world last night when the club agreed a £30m deal to sign the France striker Karim Benzema, a transfer that takes their spending beyond £180m since Florentino Pérez was reappointed as their galáctico-obsessed president a month ago.

Pérez has now signed Cristiano Ronaldo for £80m, Kaka for £59m, Raúl Albiol for £13m and brought in the man regarded as the most exciting young player in France, in a deal that could rise to £35.2m depending on his success at the Bernabéu.

Benzema, the scorer of 23 goals in Ligue 1 last season, has been heavily linked with Arsenal and, particularly, Manchester United but Sir Alex Ferguson’s long-standing admiration for the 21-year-old Lyon player never manifested itself in the form of a concerted attempt to bring him to Old Trafford as a replacement for Carlos Tevez.

Instead, United have left Madrid unchallenged to add yet another striker to their already bloated squad. “We know his importance and his efficiency in our squad,” Claude Puel, the Lyon coach, said. “He’s an exceptional player but we also know the financial figures of the club.”

Lyon said in a statement: “The player wishes to take the opportunity offered to him by Real Madrid to become one of the key players in an ambitious new policy involving several of the world’s biggest players. Lyon has accepted Karim Benzema’s decision and negotiated the terms of a transfer which satisfies all sides.”

Benzema, who has helped Lyon win four Ligue 1 titles and has already accumulated 24 caps for France, scoring six goals in the process, was finalising the deal in Madrid tonight while, back in England, Ferguson’s options now appear to have receded even further as he contemplates starting the season with only two senior strikers, Wayne Rooney and Dimitar Berbatov.

Ronaldo’s transfer was officially formalised today, with United receiving the money in one lump sum, and the indications from Old Trafford are that Ferguson is happy to sit on the money for the time being, despite having already spent £16m on signing Luis Antonio Valencia from Wigan Athletic.

“Cristiano has been a marvellous player for Manchester United,” Ferguson said in a statement. “His six years at Old Trafford have seen him develop into the best footballer in the world.

“His contribution has been a major factor in the club’s success in that time and his talent, his ability to entertain and his infectious personality have enthralled fans the world over. Everyone here wishes him well in his future career.”

Ronaldo’s new career as a Madrid player had an inauspicious start, however, when he allegedly smashed a car window after being followed by photographers in Lisbon. A 17-year-old woman was reportedly hurt by flying glass and has filed a complaint to the police.

“He [the photographer] chased me by car from the Ritz Hotel with my mother in the car with me and they filmed all our actions,” Ronaldo said on the website of Gestifute, the agency that represents him. “The chase so perturbed my mother that I had to stop and convince them to leave us.” Reports suggested Ronaldo smashed the window with a single kick. A spokesperson for Lisbon police declined to comment.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Real Madrid seal £30m Benzema deal

• Transfer fee paid by Real could rise to £35.2m
• Lyon resigned to losing prize attacking asset

Karim Benzema has joined Real Madrid from Lyon for a minimum of €35m (£30m), which could rise to €41m (£35.2m), after the two clubs reached agreement over the striker. Lyon have accepted this bid and the player is now negotiating the terms of his transfer.

Earlier today, Lyon admitted that the La Liga side had offered a substantial amount for their prize asset, who was also interesting a number of Premier League sides, notably Manchester United. “We have received an offer which is substantially higher than the figures being talked about,” a Lyon spokesman told L’Equipe.

Claude Puel, the coach of the French club, appeared resigned to losing the player yesterday when he admitted the club would have to look at the “financial figures”. “We know his importance at OL and his efficiency in our squad,” he told the club website. “He’s an exceptional player but we also know the financial figures of the club.”

And last night, after the unveiling of Kaká, the Real Madrid sporting director, Jorge Valdano, said: “We do not discard the possibility that in the next few hours, something could happen.”

Benzema, 21, developed at Lyon and helped them win four Ligue 1 titles. He has won 24 caps for France, scoring six goals.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


£30m Benzema set to join Real

• Clubs reportedly agree £30m fee for French international
• Lyon claim they have received a higher offer for player

France striker Karim Benzema is set to join Real Madrid from Lyon for a fee believed to be €35m (£30m) after the two clubs reached agreement, French radio station RMC said today. A few details, notably salary and the length of his contract, still needed to be settled, RMC said, quoting the player’s agent, Karim Djaziri. “Benzema will sign for Real Madrid tonight,” he said.

A spokesman for Lyon, however, said that no deal had yet been agreed. “We have received an offer which is substantially higher than the figures being talked about and nothing is to say that it is from Real Madrid,” Olivier Blanc told L’Equipe. “We haven’t agreed a deal with anyone [yet].”

Claude Puel, the coach of the French team, appeared resigned to losing the player yesterday when he said that the club would have to look at the “financial figures”. “We know his importance at OL and his efficiency in our squad,” he told the club website. “He’s an exceptional player but we also know the financial figures of the club.”

And last night, after the unveiling of Kaká, the Real Madrid sporting director, Jorge Valdano, said: “We do not discard the possibility that in the next few hours, something could happen.”

Benzema, 21, developed at Lyon and helped them win four Ligue 1 titles. He has won 24 caps for France, scoring six goals. Several top European clubs, including Manchester United, had expressed an interest in the promising forward.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Football ‘vulnerable’ to criminals

An official report highlights the dangers of criminals exploiting the game, but not the wrongdoers

Today’s report by the Financial Action Task Force raises the spectre, in calm, plain language, that football is vulnerable to criminals, who might take over beloved local clubs or use the transfer system to launder dirty money or evade tax. Some of it is not mightily surprising, but still, there is something startling about reading these warnings, set out calmly in an official report by an inter-governmental body whose job is “to protect the global financial system against money laundering and terrorist financing.”

One of the frustrations reading the report is that it cites actual cases which it says were referred to it by authorities in 22 countries which answered questionnaires – our FA has confirmed that it did so – yet no names are given, and we are not told if any action was taken.

Two of the cited cases are said to have taken place in the UK. One (page 28 for those of you following the link to the report) was tax evasion. The report says a player himself revealed that tax evasion had taken place when he was signed from abroad, by disguising his £300,000 signing on fee as a payment to his agent.

“The player confirmed that the agent then paid him £300,000 and did not previously disclose this to the UK tax authorities,” the report says.

Yet no case like this has ever been made public here by HM Revenue and Customs or the police, and as far as we know, nobody has ever been caught or punished for it. HMRC has an ongoing investigation into alleged tax offences in football, but no charges have been brought and all involved still maintain their innocence. Puzzling, then, that the FATF have written this case in their report as fact, saying the player himself disclosed it.

The second UK case is said to have involved tax evasion through image rights. This again, is written as a fact. Read it in full on page 29; the bones of it are that a club paid a player huge money for his image rights, to an offshore company in which he had shares, even though the club did not actually do anything to financially exploit his image. The case study says the club has been forced to pay almost £1.4m in extra tax after admitting that it was not in reality an image rights agreement, but part of the players’ wages, on which no tax was being paid. It is all presented as established fact, yet no names are named. Intriguing.

Most fascinating to football fans who have long worried that their clubs can be taken over by anybody however dubious their character or financial backing, is that the FATF wholly agrees that this is a risk. Highlights are:

- “Despite the tremendous growth of the industry, many clubs are financially in bad shape and their financial trouble could urge football clubs to accept funds from dubious parties”;
- Football clubs are indeed seen by criminals as the perfect vehicles for money laundering;
- Criminals often seek a status outside the criminal world and football can offer the opportunity for acquiring such a patron status (“sugar daddy”)

The report says that football clubs are more vulnerable than other businesses becauset they are “deeply rooted in local societies.”

It also says that where offshore companies own the “economic rights” of players, there is a risk of money-laundering of which the authorities should be aware.

So the report puts into official form the warning raised by fans around the country for years: the very fact that football clubs are beloved local sporting homes, passed down the generations and regarded, moist-eyed and soft-of-heart, as extensions of the family, makes them prey to unscrupulous people taking them over, particularly if the clubs are always strapped for cash regardelss of how much money is pouring in. Those individuals gain fame and respectability from hob-nobbing in directors’ boxes, can seek to make a fortune for themselves and, possibly, launder their money through the clubs too.

The FA here receives three honourable mentions for having issued guidance to its clubs last year on the dangers of money laundering, having a compliance unit, and working with the relevant authorities to combat crime. It is worth remembering that English football is in fact less “wild west” than most other countries, having dragged itself into better regulation over the last ten years. The Premier League is irritated that the report has been compiled and written after no contact with them at all, and points out that it, too, has measures in place, including its fit and proper person test, to counter takeovers by criminals who have actually been convicted.

Still, the warning signs are there, in black and white, in a useful, but rather tantalising report, in which big crimes are cited, but no names are mentioned.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


South Africa’s race prism

As South Africa prepares to host the World Cup, there are signs that tournament could help to break down racial barriers

“In Britain, everything is seen through the prism of class,” a film director told me. “In South Africa, everything is seen through the prism of race.”

I have just spent a weekend finding that even sport is filtered through one prism or another. First, I was at the Loftus Versfeld stadium in Pretoria to see South Africa’s rugby union team beat the British and Irish Lions with the last kick of the second Test.

Rugby is traditionally the sport of the Afrikaners. The Springboks, as the national team are known, were muscular ambassadors of the apartheid government. This was something Nelson Mandela understood when, shortly after he was released and came to power, South Africa hosted the 1995 rugby World Cup.

Militant Afrikaners did not share the world’s opinion of Mandela as a saint. So he disarmed them with a simple magnanimous gesture, pulling on the green and gold jersey of the Springboks, embracing the symbol of his oppression. He wooed the Afrikaners in the language they understood.

This story, culminating in the country’s first black president presenting the World Cup to the Springboks’ white captain, Francois Pienaar, is told in John Carlin’s book, Playing the Enemy. It will get the Hollywood treatment later this year in Clint Eastwood’s film version, with Morgan Freeman as Mandela and Matt Damon as Pienaar.

Yet winning white hearts is not the same as uniting the nation. As I sat in a packed house at Loftus, it appeared that the revolution was on hold. The South African national anthem has four stanzas, each in a different language, but only when it came to the Afrikaans section did the crowd seem to find an extra lungful of enthusiasm.

All afternoon I looked out for a black face in the crowd. There must be somewhere, surely. After all, nine in 10 of the population is non-white. But I didn’t see a black supporter anywhere. Not one. Then I looked down at the row of stewards on the touchline. Every one of them black.

It’s easy to be smug after living in multicultural London and seeing the world in one city. The Lions’ fans from five nations bring a Welsh flag that says “Mold RUFC”, and a banner from Ireland that reads “Kielys of Donnybrook”. But when I look at them, I can’t see a single black face there either.

This is rugby, after all, the sport born in an English public school and long played by the privileged. The price of a Lions Test ticket was R1,140(£86), which the organisers have now admitted was too high. So is it really race, or is it class? What’s the difference in South Africa anyway?

Under apartheid, rugby was always the white sport. Football was always the black sport. So no surprise that the organiser of next year’s football World Cup, Danny Jordaan, was a member of Steve Biko’s student movement in the 1960s. He was also a professional footballer denied the chance to play internationally. “Of course I couldn’t represent my country,” he told me. “I was not regarded as a citizen.”

Jordaan, and South Africa, have been on trial over the past two weeks during the Confederations Cup, an L-plate vehicle for 2010. He has been getting defensive about the country’s reputation for violent crime, and his defenders in the South African press found an unlikely counsel in Jeremy Clarkson, the presenter of Top Gear. The Sowetan newspaper reprinted extracts from a Clarkson column that described Johannesburg as “the least frightening place on earth, yet everyone speaks of how many times they’ve been killed that day”. He went on: “I’ve sauntered through Soweto on a number of occasions, swinging a Nikon round my head, with no effect. You stand more chance of being mugged in Monte Carlo.”

It must be a positive sign that the biggest controversy of the tournament was the vuvuzela, a big plastic trumpet with a sound that has been likened to a swarm of angry bees or herd of flatulent elephants. They have been blown at South African football stadiums for years, but are now offending the ears of international commentators and players. Calls for the vuvuzela to be banned have been met by charges of European imperialism. The short riposte is TIA – “This Is Africa.”

The vuvuzela, the makarapa – an elaborate hat adapted from a miner’s helmet – and the national flag became expressions of pride in support of the national team, known as Bafana Bafana. White South Africans, even rugby diehards, have been watching the game in unprecedented numbers. As Germany discovered four years ago, football can lift a nation’s mood.

Legions of hornblowers turned Ellis Park in Johannesburg into a humming hive for the Confederations Cup final between Brazil and the United States. I wish I’d brought some earplugs. But I got used to the noise. I was more struck by what I could see.

In the crowd of 52,000 there were myriad complexions: black, white, Brazilian and Asian. An Afrikaner father and son laughed as a black man in the South African team shirt blew his vuvuzela into a mobile phone. An Indian boy had a miniature vuvuzela of his own. In a single camera shot, the American, Brazilian and South African flags could be seen waving. Meanwhile, a Brazilian banner warned the Americans: “No you can’t.”

It was proved right as Brazil came from behind to win 3-2 and receive the trophy from President Jacob Zuma, who was clearly enjoying his spot in the global limelight. As fireworks exploded in the night sky and confetti showered the Brazilians on their lap of honour, it was possible to believe that next year South Africa will put on the multicultural mardi gras it promises. And that football can exert the kind of soft power of which Mandela is master.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Money laundering risk to football

James Munro
BBC sports news correspondent

Sterling

Football is being used as a vehicle for money laundering, according to an international agency responsible for tracking the proceeds of crime.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) report warns football is at risk from criminals buying clubs, transferring players, and betting on the sport.

It also provides a rare insight into tax evasion in British football.

The report also raises concerns over human trafficking, corruption, drug trafficking and tax crime in the sport.

The FATF report provides two previously unpublished examples of tax evasion from footballers in the United Kingdom, and suggests that in both cases, the clubs were complicit in the scam.

"Money laundering is a complex crime and one which HMRC is tackling"

HM Revenue and Customs spokeswoman

In one case, according to the report: "A disclosure was made by an international player, revealing that his signing-on fee was disguised as part of a fee to a foreign agent.

"He confirmed that the agent then paid him £300,000 abroad and did not previously disclose this to the UK tax authorities."

The report goes on to suggest: "It is likely that the club concerned was fully aware that the payment to the agent included a signing-on fee for the player and the benefit to the club in such an arrangement is that it avoided social security contributions of £38,000."

In the second case, a club avoided paying tax through the use of image rights.

The report said: "A foreign player entered into an image rights agreement with a club. The player had transferred the rights to exploit his image exclusively on a world-wide basis to a company registered in a known tax haven in return for shares of that company.

"Unlike all the other players at the club, he was the only individual not to have either a signing-on fee or a loyalty bonus and appearance fees.

"The club had not exploited the player’s image in any way and after two years had sought professional advice, only to be advised that the image had no commercially exploitable value.

"Nonetheless, the club renegotiated both the playing and image rights contracts after three years, increasing the level of payments in both.

"The club concerned conceded that the image-rights agreement was part of the employment terms and paid over additional duties of £938,688. Additional duties of £404,480 were also to be paid over the future life of the image-rights contract."

HM Revenue and Customs is understood to have been involved in both cases, but for legal reasons, officials would not comment on either, though the government agency did issue a statement.

"Money laundering is a complex crime and one which HMRC is tackling," said the HMRC spokeswoman.

"We have a very good track record in the field of law enforcement and we take money laundering and tax evasion extremely seriously, focussing significant resources into tackling them.

"Our investigations can and do result in criminal prosecution sending a clear message to anyone tempted to launder money that they are taking a serious risk"

The FATF report provides a series of recommendations for how football can cope with money laundering risks.

One suggestion is that the sport adopts a code of best practices developed by the Football Association, which last year introduced a set of money-laundering guidelines.

It also highlights a risk associated with internet gambling, and suggests that the issue could be investigated in a separate FATF study.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Le Tissier pulls out of Saints takeover

• Le Tissier-backed group pulls out of running to take control
• Mark Wotte’s contract set to expire with no replacement in place

Matt Le Tissier’s bid to become Southampton chairman is over with the south-coast club now days from going out of business.

Le Tissier, the hero of many a relegation battle as a player, will not be the club’s saviour off the field after the Pinnacle consortium he was backing pulled out of the running to take control.

“It is with great regret and frustration due to ongoing issues with the Football League that I and in turn those behind the Pinnacle consortium decided to withdraw our interest in purchasing Southampton Football Club,” said Le Tissier in a statement. “With the ongoing issues with the Football League persisting, our backers have simply refused to provide the requisite funds to complete the takeover.

“I hope beyond hope that Mark Fry can find a buyer for the club. We were unaware of the issues with the Football League when we entered into our agreement to purchase the club and then coming to light so late in the day has resulted in our backer’s decision not to proceed under the terms on offer.”

Pinnacle’s attempt to take control of the club was thought to be dependent on the Football League allowing Southampton to appeal against the 10-point penalty that will be imposed next season.

The administrator, Mark Fry, is now thought to be left with two potential buyers but he said last week he would have to consider starting to wind up the club by Friday.

The Saints’ on-field problems are also increasing with the side facing the prospect of having no one to take pre-season training from tomorrow once their manager Mark Wotte’s contract expires.

Wotte will officially revert to his role within the youth set-up while the first-team coaches Michael Svensson and Dean Gorré will also be out of contract.

The club remains in danger of going bust and a swift player exodus is on the cards, with out-of-contract captain and goalkeeper Kelvin Davis reportedly close to joining West Ham and midfielder Andrew Surman linked with Wolves and Sheffield United.

“I have my last day today and then probably I will stop doing this job,” Wotte told the Southern Daily Echo. “But I don’t know who is going to do the training sessions for the first team. Michael Svensson and Dean Gorré are also gone.

“The problem is we don’t know anything that’s going to happen in the next two days. Players and staff are running out of contracts.

“I think I have been very loyal and patient with this club. But it’s hard reading people who are not making a bid expressing their opinion on the new manager they want to sign. I hope we have a solution within 24 hours and everybody can make decisions.

“I don’t think this club has to change management because it has had too many changes of management. It is probably one of the reasons this club is in League One. But if the Pinnacle group want to change the manager, they have to buy the club and then do it.”

That, clearly, is no longer on the cards.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


England U21s suffer final indignity

Germany Under-21s 4–0 England Under-21s

Goalkeeping blunders are not the sole preserve of the England senior team. And nor is heartbreak when glory is within touching distance. On a night when two years of hope and rigorous preparation went up in smoke and the nation felt the familiar ache of disappointment, Watford’s Scott Loach wanted a large hole in the ground to swallow him up. As Germany celebrated inflicting a humiliating defeat, Stuart Pearce and his England Under-21 players probably felt the same way.

Loach, having been promoted to the starting line-up after Joe Hart’s suspension, misjudged the swerving flight of Mesut Ozil’s 48th-minute free-kick and, as time momentarily stood still, the ball rode up off him and trickled over the line. At the beginning of the 2007-08 season, Loach was on loan with the Conference club Stafford Rangers. This was comfortably the biggest game of his career and it was heart-wrenching that his error effectively killed the contest.

German teams do not throw away 2–0 leads and so it proved. Although England chiselled out a trio of openings, their opponents twisted the knife further on the counter with late goals from the centre-forward Sandro Wagner who, for much of the evening, had looked to lack the composure of his namesake.

It all appeared to be too much for Pearce. The England coach raged on the touchline, his targets alternating between his players and the fourth official and, after the left-back Sebastian Boenisch had cut through James Milner in front of the dugout in the 65th minute, Pearce stepped onto the pitch and looked set to throttle the German. Mercifully, he pulled himself together and stepped back. Pearce’s frenzied eruptions did him or the Football Association no credit.

Pearce will fight on. He has signed a new two-year contract and he is determined to go one better at the next finals in Denmark in 2011. The hurt here last night, though, was never far from the surface. “I don’t subscribe to boom and bust,” he said. “If I had won tonight, I would not have been the best coach in the world. The defeat chews me up inside but all it does is spur me on to become a better coach.”

Germany effectively throttled England. The defeat was a long way from being Loach’s fault, although he was also culpable in part for Germany’s first and third goals. England were collectively second best while, tactically, they were outmanoeuvred.

Pearce’s approach was dictated by the necessity to play Theo Walcott as the lone central striker in his tried and trusted formation; Gabriel Agbonlahor and Fraizer Campbell, the only recognised front men, were suspended. England, though, were never likely to get much hold-up work from Walcott while their efforts to play him through the channels were easily repelled.

Walcott lacked support; England’s midfielders the necessary drive and invention, and Pearce, consumed by emotion, waited until the 77th minute to make a major change. He sent on Jack Rodwell in central defence and asked Micah Richards to step up front alongside the isolated Walcott. The die, however, had been cast.

Horst Hrubesch, the Germany coach, had brought in the defensive midfielder Mats Hummels to match up with England’s starting formation and he was among the many outstanding German performers, making a series of vital challenges. Germany’s ace, though, was Ozil and, having threatened to do so early on, he unpicked England to usher Germany into the lead. His through ball inside Martin Cranie was made to measure for Gonzalo Castro and the clipped finish was too smart for Loach, who went to ground too early.

Germany had been boosted by the presence of Joachim Löw, the senior manager, and as he conducted a pitchside TV interview before the game, his England counterpart Fabio Capello was conspicuous by his absence. Capello, who has been on a reconnaissance mission at the Confederations Cup in South Africa, had known since Friday that Pearce’s team had reached the final. He tried his best to make it, apparently, but he could not get a flight that worked.

England dug deep after Ozil’s goal and Pearce was a snapshot in anguish when Lee Cattermole rattled the top of the crossbar and again, when Andreas Beck somehow cleared Adam Johnson’s flick off the line after a mazy run by James Milner. Beck would scramble off the line again, from a Cattermole header. Germany finished in style with Wagner, after missing an open goal on 76 minutes, lashing his first through Loach’s legs and curling his second beautifully beyond him.

There have been many positives to this European Championship for England, among them the emergence of Kieran Gibbs and the flash of promise from Rodwell. Pearce stressed that one bad game had to be judged in the context of two encouraging years. Ultimately, though, he felt the sharp stab of failure.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Man City make £25.5m bid for Eto’o

• Samuel Eto’o has been offered a £180,000-a-week deal
• Hughes’ City spending is set to hit £200m

Manchester City have made a formal £25.5m bid for the Barcelona striker Samuel Eto’o and put together a “stratospheric offer” to make him the highest-paid player in English football.

Eto’o, one of the most prolific attackers of his generation and the scorer of the first goal when Barcelona beat Manchester United in last season’s Champions League final, will earn a weekly salary in the region of £180,000 if he can be persuaded to take part in the next phase of City’s relentless and financially driven campaign to be recognised as one of Europe’s elite clubs.

The capture of such an acclaimed player would be another significant coup for City but it also tells only part of the story, with the manager, Mark Hughes, on the verge of taking his spending through the £200m mark by signing Carlos Tevez to play alongside Eto’o. Both players have informed City that they want to join the revolution and, if everything goes according to plan, City will have taken their summer spending to £80m by the time the players report back for pre-season training.

“Eto’o has a stratospheric offer from City, which would convert him into the best-paid player in the world,” Barcelona’s president, Joan Laporta, said. “It’s starting to become clear that he has this monster offer. He wants to stay but an offer like this is very difficult to refuse. If Eto’o accepts this stratospheric offer, we will have to bring in someone. If Eto’o accepts Manchester City’s mammoth offer, we will need another striker.”

The man Barcelona want is David Villa at Valencia, once a target of Hughes until it became clear he wanted to stay in Spain, while Laporta said a deal for the 20-year-old Keirrison of Palmeiras was close to being agreed, the reported fee being €15m (£12.8m).

City have remained determined to bring in another established superstar and a £25.5m offer is worthy of Laporta’s superlatives, given that the player in question is 28 and in the final year of his contract.

Over a five-year contract Eto’o would earn around £45m which, contrary to what Laporta says, is not as lucrative as some of the salaries on offer at Real Madrid. But it would see him replace Robinho as the best-paid player in the Premier League and might make up for any misgivings the Cameroonian has about joining a club that will not be involved in Europe next season.

City have already signed Roque Santa Cruz for £17m from Blackburn Rovers and, with Tevez, Robinho, Craig Bellamy, Stephen Ireland and Shaun Wright-Phillips all on board, Hughes would then have legitimate claims to boasting one of the most exciting and dangerous attacking line-ups of any club in the world. Tevez’s two-year loan agreement at Manchester United officially expires on Tuesday and the Argentinian has provisionally agreed a £140,000-a-week contract to move across the city.

Ironically the first-team place he craves may now be anything but guaranteed but Tevez must also be impressed by City’s ambition at a time when the club’s billionaire owners in Abu Dhabi are living up to their promise to back Hughes’s judgment in the transfer market.

Hughes, who returns from a family holiday on Tuesday, was determined to get his transfer business done early in the summer and has also signed two players from Aston Villa, the England international Gareth Barry for £12m and Stuart Taylor, as a back-up goalkeeper for Shay Given.

The club have resigned themselves to John Terry staying at Chelsea, despite being led to believe for most of last season that the England captain wanted, at the very least, to hear of their plans. However, they believe they have the financial muscle to make Everton back down over the proposed transfer of Joleon Lescott, even if it might cost around £20m.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Man City make £25.5m bid for Eto’o

• Samuel Eto’o has been offered a £180,000-a-week deal
• City’s summer transfer spending is set to hit £200m

Manchester City have made a formal £25.5m bid for the Barcelona striker Samuel Eto’o and put together a “stratospheric offer” to make him the highest-paid player in English football.

Eto’o, one of the most prolific attackers of his generation and the scorer of the first goal when Barcelona beat Manchester United in last season’s Champions League final, will earn a weekly salary in the region of £180,000 if he can be persuaded to take part in the next phase of City’s relentless and financially driven campaign to be recognised as one of Europe’s elite clubs.

The capture of such an acclaimed player would be another significant coup for City but it also tells only part of the story, with the manager, Mark Hughes, on the verge of taking his spending through the £200m mark by signing Carlos Tevez to play alongside Eto’o. Both players have informed City that they want to join the revolution and, if everything goes according to plan, City will have taken their summer spending to £80m by the time the players report back for pre-season training.

“Eto’o has a stratospheric offer from City, which would convert him into the best-paid player in the world,” Barcelona’s president, Joan Laporta, said. “It’s starting to become clear that he has this monster offer. He wants to stay but an offer like this is very difficult to refuse. If Eto’o accepts this stratospheric offer, we will have to bring in someone. If Eto’o accepts Manchester City’s mammoth offer, we will need another striker.”

The man Barcelona want is David Villa at Valencia, once a target of Hughes until it became clear he wanted to stay in Spain, while Laporta said a deal for the 20-year-old Keirrison of Palmeiras was close to being agreed, the reported fee being €15m (£12.8m).

City have remained determined to bring in another established superstar and a £25.5m offer is worthy of Laporta’s superlatives, given that the player in question is 28 and in the final year of his contract.

Over a five-year contract Eto’o would earn around £45m which, contrary to what Laporta says, is not as lucrative as some of the salaries on offer at Real Madrid. But it would see him replace Robinho as the best-paid player in the Premier League and might make up for any misgivings the Cameroonian has about joining a club that will not be involved in Europe next season.

City have already signed Roque Santa Cruz for £17m from Blackburn Rovers and, with Tevez, Robinho, Craig Bellamy, Stephen Ireland and Shaun Wright-Phillips all on board, Hughes would then have legitimate claims to boasting one of the most exciting and dangerous attacking line-ups of any club in the world. Tevez’s two-year loan agreement at Manchester United officially expires on Tuesday and the Argentinian has provisionally agreed a £140,000-a-week contract to move across the city.

Ironically the first-team place he craves may now be anything but guaranteed but Tevez must also be impressed by City’s ambition at a time when the club’s billionaire owners in Abu Dhabi are living up to their promise to back Hughes’s judgment in the transfer market.

Hughes, who returns from a family holiday on Tuesday, was determined to get his transfer business done early in the summer and has also signed two players from Aston Villa, the England international Gareth Barry for £12m and Stuart Taylor, as a back-up goalkeeper for Shay Given.

The club have resigned themselves to John Terry staying at Chelsea, despite being led to believe for most of last season that the England captain wanted, at the very least, to hear of their plans. However, they believe they have the financial muscle to make Everton back down over the proposed transfer of Joleon Lescott, even if it might cost around £20m.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Real summer of spending ahead

Buoyed by the unwavering ambition of Florentino Perez, it took Real Madrid just 48 hours to complete two of the biggest transfers in football history this month.   Their newly elected president has always been one for vulgar displays of wealth, but the stunning signings of Kaka and CristianoBuoyed by the unwavering ambition of Florentino Perez, it took Real Madrid just 48 hours to complete two of the biggest transfers in football history this month. Their newly elected president has always been one for vulgar displays of wealth, but the stunning signings of Kaka and Cristiano