RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Gen Stanley McChrystal’

Gen. McChrystal Resigns; Obama Appoints Gen. David Petraeus To Head Up Troops In Afghanistan

In a brief press conference at The White House Wednesday, President Obama confirmed that Gen. Stanley McChrystal has been relieved of his duty as Commander of US Forces in Afghanistan, and will be replaced by Gen. David Petraeus. The resignation (or firing,depending on who’s telling the story) nips at the heels of disparaging comments McChrystal made [...]

Gen. Stanley McChrystal Apologizes

Gen. Stanley McChrystal apologized for a magazine profile in which his aides are quoted mocking Vice President Joe Biden and Richard Holbrooke, the special U.S. representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan. An article published this week in Rolling Stone magazine depicts McChrystal as a lone wolf on the outs with many important figures in the Obama [...]

Gilani snubs Brown on Osama presence


LONDON – Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has said that the democratic system in Pakistan will keep going in spite of the difficult circumstances. He said reports that the government had granted permission for drone strikes on Balochistan were just a part of disinformation.
Talking to TheNation before leaving Britain for Pakistan on Thursday, the Prime Minister said President ObamaÂ’s statement was very encouraging for Pakistan in which he had vowed to promote security and prosperity of Pakistan and to honour its sovereignty.
“Pakistan appreciates Obama’s statement in which he said that the US relations with Pakistan are not limited to partnership in the war against terror. Islamabad is considering the implications of the new US policy. Obama administration has taken us into confidence on this policy,” he said.
He further said his government was collecting more information about the new policy. He said Gen Stanley McChrystal and Admiral Mike Mullen were coming to Pakistan who would formulate a plan with the coordination of our Army and the government so that the new US policy might not cast negative effects on Pakistan.
The Prime Minister declared the news regarding attempt on CJÂ’s life and his own dismissal as baseless.
He said that the decision of transfer of the National Command Authority to him by the President was an evidence of the PresidentÂ’s trust in him. When asked whether there were any differences between the government and the GHQ, the Prime Minister said such wishes would never come true.
Earlier, staunchly defending his governmentÂ’s efforts to crack down on Al-Qaeda militants, Prime Minister Yousuf Gilani said Pakistan does not believe Osama bin Laden is sheltering within its borders.
He also said he wanted more clarity on new US war strategy in Afghanistan. Gilani said his government could not yet decide how and if it could implement WashingtonÂ’s new approach.
“We are studying that new policy. We need more clarity on it,” he said after talks in London with his British counterpart Gordon Brown. “After, when we get more clarity on the situation, then we will see how, if we can implement on that plan,” he told reporters in a joint Press conference with Brown.
“I personally feel the military action is not the solution for problems. Therefore we must have an exit policy,” Gilani added. “Military action is only 10 per cent. The 90 per cent is that you have to strengthen, you have to complement with the political decisions, the social, cultural input in those areas.”
Gilani publicly clashed with Brown, who on Sunday urged Islamabad to hunt down Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri. “I don’t think that Osama bin Laden is in Pakistan,” Gilani said.
“We have a good intelligence and defence cooperation with the United States,” he said, adding that “if there is any credible or actionable information that can be shared with Pakistan”, it should be forthcoming.
Gilani also disputed Brown’s oft-repeated claim that more than two-thirds of the terror plots against Britain have roots in Pakistan. “I don’t agree with this information,” he said.
“There have been Uzbeks, Chechens, Arabs, Taliban from Afghanistan… therefore we are fighting with everybody but we have been very successful. Most of them now are not in Pakistan. They might be in Afghanistan. Therefore I think we are extremely successful in handling the situation.”
At Thursday’s talks at his Downing Street office, Brown pledged more money for Pakistan’s efforts in its border regions. “The international community expects much of Pakistan,” Brown said, adding “What we’ve all got to do is work together (and) step up our efforts. This is your fight, but it’s also Britain’s fight.”
Brown offered Pakistan enhanced security cooperation and lauded Pakistan’s determination to fight against the extremists and terrorists. “We are all working together with a common goal to fight extremism,” Brown said and added “There is determination on both sides of the border and they can deny Al-Qaeda and Taliban any space.”
He was also appreciative of PakistanÂ’s democratic government for bringing all the political parties together to step up efforts against violent extremists.
“I assure you of full support of the United Kingdom in this regard,” he added. Without giving any breakdown or nationalities, Brown hinted at further increase in number of troops in Afghanistan to 300,000 by 2011 and said gradually the balance of the troops will shift in favour of the Afghan security forces to manage their own affairs.

Pak’s advise unlikely to be heard by Obama administration

Pakistani has advised the Obama administration not to send additional US troops to Afghanistan, and instead negotiate with the Taliban.
Pakistan Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani’’s office recently told visiting CIA Director Leon Panetta of “Pakistan’’s concerns relating to the possible surge of the US and ISAF forces in Afghanistan which may entail negative implications [...]

Afghanistan not In danger of falling to Taliban, says Obama’’s NSA

Afghanistan is not in imminent danger of falling to the Taliban, President Barack Obama’’s national security adviser, Lt. Gen. James Jones said Sunday as he downplayed worries that the insurgency could set up a renewed sanctuary for Al Qaeda.
Retired Gen. James Jones made the comments after eight U.S. soldiers were killed near the Pakistan border [...]

US to attack Quetta?


The United States is threatening to launch airstrikes on Mullah Omar and the Taliban leadership in Quetta as frustration mounts about the ease with which they find sanctuary across the border from Afghanistan, according to a The Sunday Times report.
The threat comes amid growing divisions in Washington about whether to deal with the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan by sending more troops or by reducing them and targeting the terrorists. This weekend the US military was expected to send a request to Defence Secretary Robert Gates for more troops, as urged by Gen Stanley McChrystal, the US commander in Afghanistan.
In a leaked strategic assessment of the war, Gen McChrystal warned that he needed extra reinforcements within a year to avert the risk of failure. Although no figure was given, he is believed to be seeking up to 40,000 troops to add to the 68,000 who will be in Afghanistan by the end of this year.
US Vice-President Joe Biden has suggested reducing the number of troops in Afghanistan and focusing on the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in Pakistan.
Last week Gen McChrystal denied any rift with the administration, saying, “a policy debate is warranted.”
So sensitive is the subject that when US President Barack Obama addressed the UN summit in New York, he barely mentioned Afghanistan.
The Times reports the unspoken problem is that if the priority is to destroy Al-Qaeda and reduce the global terrorist threat, western troops might be fighting on the wrong side of the border.
The Biden camp argues that attacks by unmanned drones on PakistanÂ’s tribal areas, where Al-QaedaÂ’s leaders are hiding, have been successful. Sending more troops to Afghanistan has only inflamed tensions.
“Pakistan is the nuclear elephant in the room,” said a western diplomat.
It is a view echoed by Richard Barrett, head of the UN Commission on Monitoring Taliban and Al-Qaeda, who believes the presence of foreign troops has increased militant activity and made it easier for the Taliban to recruit.
“If Obama sends more troops, it would better be clear what they are to do,” he said.
“A few thousand more boots on the ground may not make much difference except push the fight into areas which are currently quiet because no one is there to challenge the Taliban. I cannot see any number of troops eliminating the Taliban. Obama has a really difficult decision to make.”
In the meantime, Afghanistan is in limbo and the Taliban is taking advantage, opening up new fronts in the north and west. Al-Qaeda is also trying to capitalise on the uncertainty. The Afghan election has strengthened the position of those in Washington who advocate eliminating Taliban leaders in Pakistan.
Senior Pakistani officials in New York revealed that the US had asked to extend the drone attacks into Quetta and Balochistan.
“It wasn’t so much a threat as an understanding that if you don’t do anything, we’ll take matters into our own hands,” said one.
The problem is that while the government of President Asif Zardari is committed to wiping out terrorism, PakistanÂ’s military does not entirely share this view, according to The Times.
Earlier this year there was optimism that Pakistan had turned a corner after it confronted a Taliban group that had taken over the Swat valley and moved to within 70 miles of Islamabad.
There has been tacit co-operation over the use of drones. Some are even stationed inside Pakistan, although publicly the government denounces their use.
According to the Paper, suspicions remain among US officials that parts of Pakistan Army intelligence agency, the ISI, are supporting the Taliban and protecting Mullah Omar and other leaders in Quetta.
It was to shore up ZardariÂ’s domestic standing that Obama attended a Friends of Pakistan summit in New York on Thursday. On the same day, the US Senate tripled non-military aid to Pakistan to $1.5 billion a year.
The Obama administration hopes such moves will reduce anti-American feeling in Pakistan. A survey last month by the Pew Research Centre found that almost two-thirds regarded the US as an enemy.
According to the Paper, drone attacks on Quetta would intensify this sentiment, causing some British officials to argue that such missions would be “unthinkable”.
The Pakistani government is reluctant to take its own action, however. “We need real-time intelligence,” said Interior Minister Rehman Malik. “The Americans have never told us any location.”
Western intelligence officers say Pakistan has been moving Taliban leaders to the volatile city of Karachi, where it would be impossible to strike. US officials have even discussed sending commandos to Quetta to capture or kill the Taliban chiefs before they are moved, according to The Sunday Times.

Defeat terrorists or pay the price


UNITED NATIONS – Vowing to forge partnerships to target terrorists, President Barack Obama declared Wednesday that the United States will not permit safe-havens for Al-Qaeda to launch attacks from Afghanistan or any other country.
In a wide-ranging address to the UN General Assembly, his first since he took office earlier this year, the US leader also pledged strong economic support for Pakistan as he rolled out his administrationÂ’s policies on major world issues.
“The violent extremists who promote conflict by distorting faith have discredited and isolated themselves,” he told world leaders packing the gold-and-blue hall of the 192-member assembly.
“In confronting them, America will forge lasting partnerships to target terrorists, share intelligence, coordinate law enforcement, and protect our people.”
Obama spoke about the Pak-Afghan region while he explores alternatives to a major troop increase in Afghanistan. In this regard, US officials said he is considering a plan advocated by Vice-President Joseph Biden to scale back American forces and focus more on rooting out Al-Qaeda there and in Pakistan.
The options under review are part of what administration officials described as a wholesale reconsideration of a strategy the president announced with fanfare just six months ago. Two new intelligence reports are being conducted to evaluate Afghanistan and Pakistan, the New York Times said in a dispatch Wednesday.
The sweeping reassessment has been prompted by deteriorating conditions on the ground, the messy and still unsettled outcome of the Afghan elections and a dire report by ObamaÂ’s new commander, Gen Stanley McChrystal.
ObamaÂ’s speech to the assembly came a day ahead of an important Friends of Democratic Pakistan summit, which Obama will co-chair with Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
The US president reaffirmed WashingtonÂ’s resolve to rout Al-Qaeda but also said Washington would work to pursue positive engagement in pursuit of peace. He described hope as the most powerful weapon in forging world peace.
“We will stand by our friends on the front lines, as we and many nations will do in pledging support for the Pakistani people tomorrow,” Obama said.
“We have set a clear and focused goal: to work with all members of this body to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat Al-Qaeda and its extremist allies as a network that has killed thousands of people of many faiths and nations, and that plotted to blow up this very building.
“In Afghanistan and Pakistan, we and many nations here are helping those governments develop the capacity to take the lead in this effort, while working to advance opportunity and security for their people,” he added.
Obama listed out some of the pressing problems retarding world progress.
“The United Nations was born of the belief that the people of the world can live their lives, raise their families, and resolve their differences peacefully. And yet we know that in too many parts of the world, this ideal remains an abstraction. We can either accept that outcome as inevitable, and tolerate constant and crippling conflict. Or we can recognise that the yearning for peace is universal, and reassert our resolve to end conflicts around the world.”
That effort, he continued, must begin with an unshakeable determination that the murder of innocent men, women and children will never be tolerated.
The US President acknowledged that he took office earlier this year at a time when there was much scepticism and distrust about the United States and its intentions.
“Part of this was due to misperceptions and misinformation about my country. Part of this was due to opposition to specific policies, and a belief that on certain critical issues, America has acted unilaterally, without regard for the interests of others. This has fed an almost reflexive anti-Americanism, which too often has served as an excuse for our collective inaction.”
“We have reached a pivotal moment. The United States stands ready to begin a new chapter of international cooperation – one that recognises the rights and responsibilities of all nations.”
Obama stressed that it falls to the current generation to work together to make the most of the UN.
“The United Nations does extraordinary good around the world in feeding the hungry, caring for the sick, and mending places that have been broken. But it also struggles to enforce its will, and to live up to the ideals of its founding.”
“I believe that those imperfections are not a reason to walk away from this institution – they are a calling to redouble our efforts. The United Nations can either be a place where we bicker about outdated grievances, or forge common ground; a place where we focus on what drives us apart, or what brings us together; a place where we indulge tyranny, or a source of moral authority.”
“In short, the United Nations can be an institution that is disconnected from what matters in the lives of our citizens, or it can be indispensable in advancing the interests of the people we serve.”
Agencies add: Obama called for a new era of engagement with the world, pledging to work together with other countries while defending the interests of the United States.
The US President also pressed world leaders to help confront challenges ranging from the war in Afghanistan to nuclear standoffs with Iran and North Korea instead of expecting the United States to do it all alone.
Reflecting the pressure he faces for results on a slew of foreign policy problems, Obama issued a blunt message in his UN debut that other countries must shoulder a larger burden in tackling international crises.
Obama also delivered a stern message to global leaders to work together to solve the worldÂ’s most pressing problems.
“The time has come for the world to move in a new direction. We must embrace a new era of engagement based on mutual interest and mutual respect,” Obama said in his maiden speech to the United Nations General Assembly since taking office in January.
Obama urged international leaders to join him, saying the US could not shoulder the responsibility alone.
“Those who used to chastise America for acting alone in the world cannot now stand by and wait for America to solve the world’s problems alone,” he said.
The US leader, who will host a Group of 20 nations summit in Pittsburgh this week, also pledged to work with allies to strengthen financial regulation to “put an end to the greed, excess and abuse that led us into disaster.”
Obama also sought to shore up support from world leaders for the war in Afghanistan, where US combat deaths have risen as a resurgent Taliban has confounded efforts to stabilize the country.
“We have set a clear and focused goal: to work with all members of this body to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al-Qaeda and its extremist allies,” Obama said as he reasserted a US commitment not to allow Al-Qaeda to use Afghanistan and neighbouring Pakistan as safe havens for launching attacks.
He said he would seek a new deal with Russia on reducing nuclear weapons and said countries that refuse to meet their non-proliferation obligations must face consequences.
Obama said the next 12-months would be pivotal in efforts to strengthen the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and he pledged to seek the goal of a world without nuclear weapons.
In a reminder of the dangers facing the world, in the city still scarred by the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centre, Obama warned of the heavy price to pay if global leaders fail to act against militants.
“Consider the course that we are on if we fail to confront the status quo. Extremists sowing terror in pockets of the world. Protracted conflicts that grind on and on,” the US President said.
“Genocide and mass atrocities. More and more nations with nuclear weapons. Melting ice caps and ravaged populations. Persistent poverty and pandemic disease,” he added.

US pledge to reduce Afghan deaths

Civilian casualties in Afghanistan must be reduced, the newly appointed commander of US and Nato-led troops Gen Stanley McChrystal has told the BBC.

He said both preventing and investigating incidents where civilians were hit would be a priority.

Earlier, a UN report said the number of civilians killed so far this year had risen 24% on the same period last year.

The UN said insurgent bombings and air strikes by international forces were the biggest killers.

There has been widespread concern in Afghanistan about civilian death tolls.

In June the US military called for better training in an effort to reduce the numbers of civilian deaths.

The Taliban also issued a new code of conduct earlier this week which says fighters should minimise civilian casualties.

See civilian casualties in graphics

Gen McChrystal, the new commander of US and Nato-led troops in Afghanistan, said civilian casualties were "deeply concerning" and something he "would love to say we’d get to zero".

He said he was trying to build this into the culture of his forces, but admitted it was very hard to balance this with their own protection.

"It’s a balance for the young soldier on the ground"

Gen McChrystal

"It’s very hard because it’s a balance for the young soldier on the ground, who is in combat. One of the assets that he has that might save his life might be air power or indirect fire from artillery or mortars and we don’t want to take away that protection for him," he said.

But that "must be balanced against the possibility of hurting anyone".

He said he wanted his forces to be seen both to work actively to prevent civilian deaths, and to investigate civilian deaths openly when they did occur.

On the possibility of talks with the Taliban after presidential elections in August, Gen McChrystal said the US was willing to talk to anyone ready to seek a political solution – including local fighters and senior Taliban figures.

But he pointed out that ultimately those decisions were up to the Afghan government.

There is enormous pressure on the new commander, says the BBC’s Lyse Doucet in Kabul.

The US defence secretary Robert Gates has made it clear that foreign forces have a year to show clear progress on the security front or will lose support here and at home.

Civilian targets

piechart

The report, by the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (Unama), says insurgents were responsible for more deaths than government-allied forces.

But it also notes that two-thirds of the deaths caused by government-allied forces came in air strikes.

The rising death toll was partly due to the fact that militants were deliberately basing themselves in residential districts, the report’s authors concluded.

The increasingly sophisticated tactics used by insurgents were also highlighted.

This is the third year the UN has counted civilian deaths and the numbers have risen each year.

Election fears

The UN warned more civilians may be killed in the coming weeks as militants fight back against a major offensive by US forces ahead of key elections next month.

Elections are due to take place amid tight security on 20 August, when President Hamid Karzai is hoping to secure a second term.

However, in the past week alone there have been two attacks on Afghan election campaigns.

On Tuesday a campaign manager for presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah was wounded when his vehicle was attacked in Laghman province.

Two days earlier there was an assassination attempt on Mohammed Qasim Fahim, a running mate of Mr Karzai.

graph

Back to top
</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Karzai: Afghans want rules for troops changed

KABUL (AP) — A confident President Hamid Karzai on Monday offered peace talks to Taliban militants if they renounce violence and called for a new relationship with the West if he wins a second term in next month’s presidential election.
Karzai is considered the favorite in the Aug. 20 vote. But his chances could hinge on [...]

Karzai ‘to review foreign forces’

Karzai at election rally 24 July

Afghan president Hamid Karzai has said that he will review agreements with foreign forces operating in Afghanistan if he is re-elected.

He said he would make international forces sign an agreement governing how they operate, in an effort to limit civilian casualties.

President Karzai is seeking re-election in next month’s presidential poll.

The Afghan government has long been concerned about the civilian death toll as foreign troops battle insurgents.

The new commander of US and Nato-led troops in Afghanistan, Gen Stanley McChrystal, has recently echoed this concern.

Last month he said troops must make the shift from conventional warfare strategies to protecting Afghan civilians.

The move came after a US military inquiry found that a US air strike in May in which Afghan civilians died had breached guidelines.

The number of civilian casualties has been a potent issue for many Afghans and for candidates campaigning ahead of next month’s presidential and provincial council elections.

Tensions high

Mr Karzai was speaking at a campaign rally in the capital, Kabul.

He said that foreign forces too often took decisions without consulting the Afghan government.

US marin helicopter 11 July

"It should be clear who is the owner of the house and who is the guest," Mr Karzai was quoted by the Associated Press news agency as saying at the rally.

Tensions between Kabul and Washington have been high in recent months over the numbers of civilian casualties.

The UN says US, Nato and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians while fighting Taliban insurgents last year.

US and British troops have recently launched a major offensive against insurgent strongholds in southern Afghanistan.

President Karzai’s campaign rally comes one day after he refused to take part in a televised debate between two of the main presidential candidates.

He is facing challenges from 40 other candidates.

Correspondents say the front runners in the vote are President Karzai, former finance minister Ashraf Ghani, former foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah and former deputy speaker of the lower house of parliament, Mirwais Yasini.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Malou Innocent: Afghanistan: The Deadliest Month and It’s Time to Get Out

July has been the deadliest month yet for U.S. forces in Afghanistan. At least 27 troops have died so far this month, and an estimated…

US president sets Afghan target

A US Marine helicopter delivers supplies in Helmand province, 11 July

The increasingly deadly conflict in Afghanistan is a "serious fight" but one essential for the future stability of the country, the US president says.

Insisting that US and allied troops have pushed back the Taliban, Barack Obama said the immediate target was to steer Afghanistan through elections.

The country is due to hold a presidential vote in August.

Mr Obama spoke to Sky News as concern grew in the UK at the rising British death toll in Afghanistan.

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown was also forced on Saturday to justify British involvement in Afghanistan.

Mr Brown said the UK’s military deployment there was aimed at preventing terrorism in the UK.

Fifteen British troops have died in the past 10 days, pushing the country’s number of deaths in Afghanistan past the number killed in action in Iraq.

‘Extraordinary role’

Speaking during a day-long visit to Africa, Mr Obama also told Sky News that the battle in Afghanistan was a vital element in the battle against terrorism.

He said the continued involvement of British troops in the conflict was necessary, right and was a vital contribution to UK national security.

US President Barack Obama in Ghana, 11 July

"This is not an American mission," Mr Obama said.

"The mission in Afghanistan is one that the Europeans have as much if not more of a stake in than we do.

"The likelihood of a terrorist attack in London is at least as high, if not higher, than it is in the United States."

He praised the efforts of all troops currently fighting the Taleban in gruelling summer heat, singling out British forces for praise when asked if their role was still important.

"Great Britain has played an extraordinary role in this coalition, understanding that we can not allow either Afghanistan or Pakistan to be a safe haven for al-Qaeda, those who with impunity blow up train stations in London or buildings in New York.

"We knew that this summer was going to be tough fighting. They [the Taliban] have, I think, been pushed back but we still have a long way to go. We’ve got to get through elections."

‘Core mission’

Since taking office in Washington in January of this year, Mr Obama has announced a troop "surge" in Afghanistan.

British soldiers carry the coffin of a comrade, 10 July

The US has said it is sending up to 30,000 new troops to Afghanistan this year to take on a resurgent Taleban. They will join 33,000 US and 32,000 other Nato troops already in the country.

He also replaced the incumbent US commander in the country, ousting Gen David McKiernan less than a year into his command.

The new US chief in Afghanistan, Gen Stanley McChrystal, has a stellar reputation from his days commanding special forces operations in Iraq.

He has been tasked with the mission of outsmarting the Taliban, who continue to win support among ordinary Afghans often caught in the crossfire of the bitter fighting.

High numbers of Afghan civilian casualties have become an issue of major concern to the US. Afghan President Hamid Karzai has regularly called on the international forces to reduce the numbers of Afghans killed in its operations.

Speaking to Sky News, Mr Obama said although forces were currently engaged in heavy fighting, new strategies for building bridges with Afghan society would be considered once the country had held its presidential election.

A young girl in Afghanistan, 10 July

Afghanistan needed its own army, its own police and the ability to control its own security, Mr Obama said – a strategy currently being implemented in Iraq, where security is being handed over to Iraqi forces.

"All of us are going to have to do an evaluation after the Afghan election to see what more we can do," the president said.

"It may not be on the military side, it might be on the development side providing Afghan farmers alternatives to poppy crops, making sure that we are effectively training a judiciary system and a rule of law in Afghanistan that people trust."

"We’ve got a core mission that we have to accomplish."</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.