RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Greg’

The Mother Hips: Breathing Differently

By: Dennis Cook

The Mother Hips by Andrew Quist

Hovering on the verge of their 20th anniversary, The Mother Hips have just released their seventh studio effort, Pacific Dust (out October 26 on Camera Records), and, to the surprise of no one who’s spent a little time with their work, it’s another end-to-end pop-rock jewel. The pleasurable consistency and solidity of the Hips suggests what might have occurred if the classic lineups of Badfinger or Big Star hadn’t lost the script, a music of nigh indestructible musicianship, songwriting, and unforced, organic production. Pacific Dust goes down so smoothly that it’s easy to miss what a quality thing they’ve created. Theirs is not a way prone to flash or spotlights, but instead a craftsmanship that’s rare and enduring.

A compelling, easy to like bunch from the start, The Mother Hips, as a unit, have fully gelled in recent years, where the music on Pacific Dust and 2007′s predecessor Kiss The Crystal Flake reflects the layers of weird understanding they share as people. “Sure, but definitely in a very weird way,” laughs singer-guitarist-composer Greg Loiacono knowingly. Together with Tim Bluhm (vocals, guitar, songwriting), John Hofer (drums), and Paul Hoaglin (bass, vocals), Loiacono has built up one of rock’s sturdiest catalogs and one of the most sterling live reputations in the industry. The Mother Hips are a band synonymous with quality, something brought sharply into focus by their new release.

“We went into the studio over a year ago, and there were ideas and a few songs. We put one mic up and just played. In fact, a lot of the songs that ended up on Pacific Dust were tried out and jammed on that first night,” says Loiacono. “What we did in these sessions is go over a piece three or four times and then press record so we had one take as a reference to take home so everyone could remember their parts and what they were doing. We typically don’t do that, however. Tim or I will often come in and say, ‘Here’s a song. Here’s how it goes,’ and then the other guys help fill it in. If there’s a bass part the hands you want to leave that in belong to Paul Hoaglin. But the song ‘Pacific Dust’ is a really good example of the whole band composing a piece.”

“‘Pacific Dust’ was actually created when we were out in Vail, Colorado two summers ago playing this weird, crappy little place. We were supposed to play this 200-year-old lodge but it burnt down a few weeks before. So, we ended up in the complete opposite – this underground sports bar with Schnapps girls. We got there for sound check early and were able to jam out. Tim had the little guitar figure for ‘Pacific Dust,’ then Hofer put in that totally unexpected drumbeat, and then we all started messing around,” explains Loiacono. “We forgot about it until we were in the studio this time and then Tim started doing that riff and we all tried to remember what we were doing in Vail. Originally it was an instrumental, but because Camera Records was gung-ho for it to have words Tim took a stab at it. It has such a cool feel, sort of spooky.”

The looser jam approach produced compelling results, like the smoky, dark edged swirl of the title tune.

“I loved it! It was delightful, and we hadn’t done that in many, many years, but not on purpose. We just hadn’t gotten around to it. It’s neat to come up with an instrumental song and then develop lyrics and a melody to put on top of it. It’s a great way to do it, except when you have to put it together onstage,” says Bluhm. “The guitar parts don’t go with singing parts very well because they weren’t executed at the same time. It’s kind of like learning to juggle for the first time. Your hands are doing one thing and your inner voice is doing another. It took a few days to figure out, but it’s sort of funny to not be able to play your own songs.”

Meet Paul Hoaglin

Paul Hoaglin by Andrew Quist

What is your favorite word? Rickenbacker.

What is your least favorite word? Compromise.

What turns you on? Jealousy and anger (my own.)

What turns you off? Feeling powerless.

What sound or noise do you love? The kids saying “Bad Robot” at the end of each episode of Lost.

What sound or noise do you hate? Fall Out Boy.

What is your favorite curse word? Bugger.

What is the craziest damn thing you ever saw? The movies on the insides of my eyelids before I would fall asleep as a child.

What profession other than your own would you like to attempt? Any that would hire me. Something with absolutely no human contact would be nice, in an underground bunker with no natural light if possible.

What profession would you not like to do? Musician.

What is one album that you never tire of listening to? None – they all wear out their welcome for a while at some point, even the Beatles, believe it or not, although they last the longest for me on average.

If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the Pearly Gates? This was only a test. If this had been an actual life, you would have been given some small inkling of a clue what to do and where to go, and who to become. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Continue reading for more on The Mother Hips…

 


Live, we’re not afraid of playing a song for 22-minutes, but we only do it if it’s going somewhere. It’s actually something we want to do more in the studio, take that ‘Pacific Dust’ model and expand on it.

-Greg Loiacono

 

Photo by: Andrew Quist


The California Thing

“That vein has been mined pretty heavily – by us and me in particular – and it’s still there, [with imagery] like being lost in a fog bank and the word ‘Pacific,’ of course,” says Bluhm, who seems at peace with the idea that the Hips will always be viewed as the quintessential California rock band. “The only thing that could get us out of it is if we had more widespread recognition, if the thing that got us beyond where we are was a song that didn’t really have any of that [California] flavor to it, like ‘Third Floor Story.’ If a song like that overshadowed everything else we did on a national level, then we might lose the tag. But if it was a song like ‘One Way Out’ it would reinforce it. Really, I don’t care.”

The Mother Hips

Trying to group The Mother Hips’ music under any one umbrella, even one as broad as ‘California Soul Rock,’ is foolish. They’ve explored the possibilities of psych-rock that’d cheer Blue Cheer, country of Haggard quality, and pure pop the Gibb Brothers would approve of. And that’s not all by a good stretch. The Hips never seem fully satisfied with where they’re at, one eye always locked on the horizon, impatient for what’s next.

“Maybe that’s just knowing that everything can always be better, being humble to the fact that someone’s going to write a better song than you’ll ever write or be a better band than you’ll ever be,” says Bluhm in almost complete contrast to the uber-egos inside many rock acts that believe they’re golden gods. “I might believe it in moments, but I wouldn’t tell it to a writer during an interview!”

One pleasant surprise on Pacific Dust is the inclusion of beloved live staple “Third Floor Story,” a tune of ferocious strength that often finds the boys feeling their oats in concert. One hopes they feel at least somewhat golden when they pull this one out.

“That was our boys Joe [Raaen, Hips manager] and Jon [Salter, Camera Records] saying we had to record it. They were like, ‘Come on, do it. Just see how it feels!’ We were reluctant about doing it, but we’re always reluctant when anybody tells to do anything. That’s not new, hence, us not taking the good advice of Rick Rubin and Chris Robinson when we first got on American Records. If we’d been a little more open-minded and willing who knows if we might have held onto some friendships a little longer,” observes Loiacono. “Tim and I decided to switch things up and take some suggestions this time. And Paul and John were open to it, so we did it. And we really enjoyed it and were happy with [the take], even had Jackie [Greene] come in and play some keys on it [Greene guests on keys throughout Pacific Dust]. And then we give it to the label and they say, ‘It’s too slow!’ I was like, ‘Pardon me?’ Our immediate response was, ‘This is why we don’t take suggestions! This is the most grooving, heavy thing ever!’”

“They told us we play it faster live, and we didn’t believe them, but we listened to some live recordings and it was true,” continues Loiacono. “We were definitely bothered. Tim and I found ourselves saying, ‘Well, why don’t you come in and record it the way you want?’ and other stupid things like that. It’s real, and when you’re in it you take this stuff seriously. So, we re-recorded it and the ‘Third Floor’ on the record is a little different. Instead of having the two guitar solos it has one and we played it faster. We were pissed and it was good fuel and it came out well. In the end, we ended up with two slamming versions [the slower take is available with the seven-song bonus download EP for Pacific Dust]. Reluctantly, we were able to take someone’s advice and I’m glad we did.”

Meet Tim Bluhm

Tim Bluhm by Miller

What is your favorite word? Together.

What is your least favorite word? Sexy, when used in a business context.

What turns you on? Confidence.

What turns you off? Indecision.

What sound or noise do you love? Harmony.

What sound or noise do you hate? Car Alarm.

What is your favorite curse word? Goddamn.

What is the craziest damn thing you ever saw? My neighbor Mark surfing 30 foot waves one mile off the Mendocino coast, alone.

What profession other than your own would you like to attempt? Movie actor.

What profession would you not like to do? Meter maid.

What is one album that you never tire of listening to? Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere [Neil Young].

If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the Pearly Gates? You actually CAN take it with you.

Getting Dusty

The new album was co-produced by the band and Dave Simon-Baker (ALO, Eric Martin), who is Bluhm’s partner at Mission Bells Studio in S.F.

“I was very conscious of keeping it balanced so it wasn’t just me steering things but Greg, John and Paul, too. I wanted to make sure I wasn’t producing it because it didn’t seem appropriate. The way the Hips have always made records is not that way,” says Bluhm. “That being said it was done in my studio with a lot of my equipment, so it was like the band came over and made dinner in my kitchen. The things Dave and I have learned about that room and that equipment was useful in getting the record to sound the way it does. And having the studio as a resource makes it possible to record almost constantly.”

Hoaglin & Bluhm by Quist

“We keep getting better at playing our instruments, and having a good engineer in the studio means we can capture good tones happening in a reasonable amount of time so we can actually capture those valuable live moments,” continues Bluhm. “In the studio, it’s always a race between getting the best possible tone you can while the clock of patience is running down on the band. The longer it takes the bigger the chance the band will be past the peak for their potential that day. A lot of the time the band is ready hours before the engineer is, and then you get a lackluster performance, even if it’s correct. If you have the right formula between tone and band readiness then it’s genius. And we do now, and I’m not sure we ever did in the past.”

“Pacific Dust” and other sections of the new album suggest the band has found a way to tap into the earlier, free-form jamming, drug-fueled Hips and pour that vibe into more structured containers.

“I think ‘Cheer Up Champ’ [Pacific Dust's closer] is maybe our longest studio recording yet; I think it even beats ‘Turtle Bones’ [a bent fan favorite off their 1993 debut, Back To The Grotto] as the longest song on a Mother Hips album. Live, we’re not afraid of playing a song for 22-minutes, but we only do it if it’s going somewhere. It’s actually something we want to do more in the studio, take that ‘Pacific Dust’ model and expand on it,” says Loiacono. “Conversely though, Tim and I have some more rootsy songs coming up, and we were thinking, ‘Hey, wouldn’t it be cool to do another Later Days style album?’ But there’s also the thought, ‘Wouldn’t it be cool to do a whole Pac Dust type session where we just take songs from inside the jams, Queens of the Stone Age style?’ Guess what? Let’s do both.”

Pacific Dust captures a fair amount of the band member’s personalities, and this band overflows with personality, both individually and collectively. The result is an album that doesn’t scrimp on individual nuance and charm, so the collective feel is stronger than ever, creating a sound that’s both dense and fluid – very full rock ‘n’ roll made by the entire group.

“I do feel that’s true, absolutely, especially given that some of these songs were written from improvising, which makes it even more obvious this is a band playing not just a song, but bringing their personalities together,” observes Bluhm. “Paul, as a bass player, is just so involved with the melodic components of each song, just building these counter-melodies and complexities. So much is going on down there in his world you could never take it all in with a single listen.”

Continue reading for more on The Mother Hips…

Meet Greg Loiacono

Greg Loiacono by Quist

What is your favorite word? Telecaster.

What is your least favorite word? Fecal.

What turns you on? Sunlight.

What turns you off? Bad odors.

What sound or noise do you love? The long moan of a shark warning siren.

What sound or noise do you hate? Lip smacking.

What is your favorite curse word? Fuck.

What is the craziest damn thing you ever saw? When I was 17 I was driving down the Waldo Grade from S.F. to Marin County to watch Carlos Montoya play at the Marin Civic Center. Right at the bottom of the grade on the side of the road was a car on fire and the flames were shooting up about 15 feet into the air… and I was on mushrooms.

What profession other than your own would you like to attempt? Assembly line worker. Preferably placing small parts into medium sized objects.

What profession would you not like to do? Outhouse serviceman.

What is one album that you never tire of listening to? Specialist in All Styles by Orchestra Baobab.

If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the Pearly Gates? Hello, I’m Johnny Cash.

Roll Over, Charles Ives

When one thinks of rock & roll one name unlikely to pop up is modernist composer Charles Ives, yet one of the standouts on Pacific Dust – and really the whole Greg Loiacono songbook – is Side B marvel “Young Charles Ives.”

Mother Hips by Andrew Quist

“When I think about music I don’t necessarily think about rock & roll all the time,” Loiacono quickly retorts. “A good friend of mine, Scott Thunes, who played with Zappa in the ’80s, tends to turn me onto amazing stuff. Early on in our friendship I told him I don’t know much about [music] theory. I’ve never studied music in the classical sense. That was his cue to cram all sorts of information into my head. He’s got a mind! He gave me Bartók’s String Quartets, Firebird Suite and Rite of Spring, and he’d not only give me music but he’d bring the scores to me. Then we’ll go for coffee after we drop off the kids and pull out the score for Schoenberg’s “Transfigured Night” and sit and listen together. He says, ‘Look at this!’ and I pretend to understand [laughs]. So, one night as I was leaving to play The Fillmore, Scott says, ‘You have to listen to Charles Ives and The Unanswered Question.’ So, I put it on, and that fall feeling was descending and I was driving in my car listening to it and was just blown away. It was just the pacing, not this big, dramatic classical piece. Then it moves into these sections where Ives seems to be pasting one orchestra on top of another. By the time I got to The Fillmore to play my little guitar amp my mind was just blown.”

“So, I started listening to Ives a lot, and when I told Scott how touched I was he gave me Ives’ autobiography. I was reading that and was just fascinated. His retelling of things his father did and said, and his father being the outstanding musician he was did things like tuning his piano to quarter tones because 12 tones just weren’t enough for him. He could hear that deeply,” continues Loiacono. “There’s an image in the book where he’s looking out the window and sees his dad standing in the pouring rain looking up at church bells. Then he’d race back into the house and try to tune the piano to find those same beautiful tones. In the book it doesn’t really show it in this light, but to me this moment seemed like a realization for young Charlie that his dad is doing his thing simply because he has to. There’s this and a lot of scenes where he seems to be telling young Charlie, ‘Learn. Do what you gotta do to pass the classes but don’t buy it. You can do whatever you want to do.’”

“So, I had the music to ['Young Charles Ives'] but it was going to be called ‘Esoteric Dream’ or something. Then, I decided to do a topical song – I don’t do a lot of those – and this subject matter was moving me. It was also a chance to say, ‘Wow, here’s this composer who did what he wanted to do,’ and his father’s presence is so strongly felt. And in the book he speaks of that so earnestly, and I really enjoyed that,” says Loiacono. “In learning about and appreciating his music I wanted to make a tribute to that style of music. So, at the end there’s that outro that hangs on the C chord and I thought I could take an American classical folk song and graft it on. I’d already figured out I needed strings on that bump, and I ended up deciding to do it with [Ives'] music instead. And we had the strings just record their part and not play to the music, so it has a more sort of surreal feel, like it was just dropped in.”

Meet John Hofer

John Hofer by Quist

What is your favorite word? Pulchritude.

What is your least favorite word? Turpitude.

What turns you on? Some feet.

What turns you off? All the other feet.

What sound or noise do you love? A great song.

What sound or noise do you hate? A great band with talented musicians without equally great material who need a super talented songwriter/lyricist like Robert Hunter.

What is your favorite curse word? Fuck It.

What is the craziest damn thing you ever saw? G. W. Bush being elected to a 2nd term.

What profession other than your own would you like to attempt? Philanthropist.

What profession would you not like to do? Proctologist.

What is one album that you never tire of listening to? Big Star’s Third/Sister Lovers.

If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the Pearly Gates? Why didn’t anyone in the world ever listen to you? You told them you were sick.”

On The Road Again

As fine as what they’ve wrought on Pacific Dust, it’s on stages where the rest of these new stories will be told. Few bands have a more lively, active engagement with their catalog than the Hips, and if the glorious fire ‘n’ slash witnessed on the Dust tracks at their recent Las Tortugas sets is any indication (see review here), it’s going to be a lot of fun for audiences and band alike, starting this Friday and Saturday in Chicago when the Hips team up with another under-sung American treasure, Backyard Tire Fire.

“Of course, for any band playing the new songs onstage is just exciting, to see how they grow and change. It’s very enjoyable,” says Bluhm. “Some of the studio arrangements don’t work and you have to see if you can make them breath in a different way. That’s always the challenge… with a lot of things.”

The Mother Hips will be popping up all over the country in the coming months, including a two-night stand in Austin in early December and their first Jam Cruise in January. Find full tour dates here.

JamBase | Falcon Fuzzed
Go See Live Music!


Devendra Banhart: Can’t Help But Smiling

By: Dennis Cook

Devendra Banhart by Lauren Dukoff

One never knows where a conversation will begin, travel or end when speaking with Devendra Banhart. There’s a strong feeling of being in uncharted waters when one wades into his depths. To wit, our recent chat was set up to discuss his focused, lovely new album, What Will We Be (released October 27 on Warner Bros.), but instead we begin with an etymology discussion about onomatopoeia. “A word like ‘pulchritude’ doesn’t sound like beauty, but it is,” says Banhart, who’s a touch surprised at the elasticity of onomatopoeias. “I’ve been mislead… by the dictionary! Language is SO fun!”

Fun plays a major part in Banhart’s overall makeup. He delights in playing with ideas, sensibilities, his own predilections, and considerably more. He’s a serious cat who refuses to become calcified, and he shakes off stiffness and rote with a giggle and a grin. Like the Japanese, he delights in things that lend themselves to multiple meanings and interpretations.

“It keeps your mind a little more alert when you have more options and more possibilities. The natural cataloging of neural abilities is going to do that just processing input. I think the more possibilities there are the more you exercise that,” says Banhart. “Weird sponge unearths gold.”

Despite an ever-evolving relationship with Banhart, I still find myself caught flat-footed from time to time by his pronouncements. I can’t rightly tell you what ‘weird sponge unearths gold’ means but I do think it’s evocative as hell, a five-syllable fitness routine for those neural pathways he speaks of. And his music functions just the same. Linear isn’t a route he follows very often, and even in his simplest moments there floats wispy complications. While What Will We Be is filed in the rock section, it slips borders like a grifter with a briefcase full of passports. Banhart is a citizen of the world AND a citizen of no world, and his music increasingly sounds like he’s figured out what the Top 40 in his alternate universe sounds like. The new album carries one along in a seemingly effortless way, the gentle, love-bruised first half giving way to things more raucous and darkly sensual on Side B. 2009 is a crossroads year, a time when crucial choices in myriad realms must be addressed. And in its own subtle, slinky ways, What Will We Be tackles that zeitgeist head-on.

“I want it to be a question we all ask ourselves as individuals, as a species. And the way the title is written on the CD is important. It’s written ‘What Will’ and underneath that ‘We Be,’ so there’s two ways of reading it – there’s the question and the answer. The answer to ‘What Will We Be?’ is ‘What We Will Be.’ I think there’s something comforting about that,” offer Banhart. “That question is a new question for us, collectively, to ask, ‘What the fuck is going to happen?’ I hate to say 2012 but I’m afraid.”

Devendra Banhart at Coachella by Lauren Dukoff

It’s all fine and well to be a dreamer and an artist but present and looming circumstances necessitate action, if only to actively prod at our sore spots and see what we can do to heal them.

“No joke. I’m with you 100-percent, but it’s not all bleak. A time of change is exciting. Without destruction there’s no change,” Banhart observes. “What form that destruction will take is frightening because it’s unknown, but it can also be a beautiful thing.”

There’s a love song on What Will We Be that announces, “Please destroy me,” and so the cosmic truths we’re circling around also plant themselves in the personal in Banhart’s work. Here, love’s positive evisceration is acknowledged.

“I don’t know if that’s a compliment or not [laughs]. ‘Will you please destroy me.’ I have no problem with that,” says Banhart, who also manages to condense an entire love affair into two consecutive songs, “First Song for B” and “Last Song for B,” on the new album. “I was a little worried about that, whether I should do that or not. The way I write lyrics is just an editing process. I take 10 pages and try to edit them down to two lines. I want to cut as much as possible to get to the essence of what I’m trying to communicate, and infuse it with some sort of potency at the same time.”

“A work is finished when it takes on a life of its own and changes. I don’t think a work is done when it’s cemented, or when it petrifies, which is what happens eventually to a piece of music,” continues Banhart. “I think music is truly finished when it becomes some undulating light liquid of sound that’s not sedentary.”

If there’s one criticism of Banhart’s earlier albums it’s a tendency to run a little long, three or four songs over a comfortable listen. He admits that within his inner circle the one observation that continually comes up, usually when a friend is a little wasted, is, “Dude, too many songs.” What Will We Be rectifies this with well sequenced succinctness, two 25-minute halves that yin ‘n’ yang organically.

Devendra Banhart by Moses Berkson

“This time we didn’t have the distractions – we didn’t have the opportunity for distractions – and this time we emerged from a fog. That’s what comes to mind when I think of the last record [2007's Smokey Rolls Down Thunder Canyon], a physical place where I, and most of the other people involved to some degree, were when we made it. Comparing it to the new one, that record is covered in fog to me. A man in a fog is a little bit lost and knows that things are coming apart a bit,” says Banhart. “With [What Will We Be] we did shit like one hour vocal warm-ups before each take. That’s what [co-producer] Paul Butler [The Bees] brought to the record. He’d say, ‘You have to warm up your voice for an hour. We have to go over every note on the piano and go up and down a couple scales and match the piano note at different intervals. Once we do that for one hour then we can track.’ My condition for doing that was that we also do a take with the first thing that comes out when I open my mouth in the morning. I don’t come in saying, ‘What up, dog?’ or anything. The first take is the first utterance out of my mouth for that day. Then I’d do the vocal warm-up. I think that contrast helped create more interesting vocal dynamics.”

The primitive yelp and a more studied form of practice both have a place inside Banhart’s music, which thrives on variety, contradictions, and even conundrums. Somewhere in the middle of the maelstrom there’s a point of connection, and there you find Devendra Banhart.

“I’ve yet to find that person, but I keep lookin’ [laughs]. I don’t know except to say that last time there was an element of being lost that didn’t feel that way this time at all,” Banhart says. “Each record is where we were at that time. I’m not ashamed of it or bummed about it. It is what it is.”

Part of the solidity and flow of the new material may be a byproduct of several years of communing and gigging with the core band on What Will We BeNoah Georgeson (guitar, vocals), Greg Rogove (percussion, vocals), Luckey Remington (bass, vocals) and Rodrigo Amarante (guitar, vocals). Each has become adept at translating Banhart’s ideas into practice, as well as increasingly found a place for their own strong concepts and styles to shine somewhat within his schema.

“I’m very fortunate to know a lot of people in this band for as many as 12 years now, even before they started making music,” says Banhart. “Greg I’ve known for almost seven years now. I met him at the time we were dating the CocoRosie sisters. Rodrigo I met at an Os Mutantes show; the only other person there that was crying and having a heart attack freaking out about Os Mutantes. I knew that was a guy I could talk to about music!”

Continue reading for more on Devendra Banhart…

 


First off, what the fuck are these guys thinking? [laughs]. Have they listened to my music, which has the least commercial prospects in the world? My attitude is they’re this suffocating behemoth in its last days, but they seem interested.

-Banhart on signing to Warner Bros.



Photo by: Neil Krug

 

Talk turns to icons we admire, spurred on talk of Mutantes’ recent moving Outside Lands performance.

“I’ve always loved Tony Bennett. He’s always just done his thing. He didn’t go through a ’80s phase where he made weird fuckin’ electro-pop. If you just stick to your thing it comes around eventually,” observes Banhart, who draws inspiration from individualistic artists like Bennett, Os Mutantes’ Sergio Dias, and major touchstone Caetano Veloso. “My definition of selling out is when you change what you do as a reaction to what people expect or don’t expect you to do, when you change the art you share with the world based on ANYTHING but the natural reality of the necessity for change. These artists are a reminder that one can live that natural reality and still thrive.”

Georgeson, Banhart, Rogove, Remington, Amarante
By Neil Krug

While Banhart is entirely comfortable with constant change, his audience has at times bristled at his endlessly evolutionary ways. Some still long for a return to the nursery rhyme simplicity of his early songs, missing out on the delicious layering that’s gone on in recent years on his own albums as well as his quality freak rock side project with Rogove, Megapuss. Jazz, doo wop, tone poems, and way more are given electrical charge and sculpted purpose in his more recent recordings, even as the childlike P.O.V. of “Little Yellow Spider” continues alongside the hard won wisdom he’s taken in lately. Still, there’s some fans that dream wistfully of his homeless days bouncing between couches and recording ditties on telephone answering machines.

“I’m so happy I’m not still fucking doing that six records in! At the same, I’ll be back at doing that again soon. Trust me, I have a Starbucks application always at hand. I can always return to that because I understand how that works,” says Banhart, one of those rare artists who rarely give their audience exactly what they expect. “I’m not trying to help along evolution, and I don’t think anyone can. I’m not trying to do anything. This is just how this thing works – time, life, music. It’s not like we say, ‘Well, we’re making a new record. It better be different than the last one!’”

Devendra Banhart by Lauren Dukoff

“It’s happened to me, too, where I’ve liked a musician and I put on a new record and it doesn’t sound like the last one and I’m turned off. I’m like, ‘Oh man, where’s that other stuff? I liked that!’ And then a year later I’ll hear the new record again and I love it and realize I just needed to look at it for what it was in that moment and not judge it by the past,” observes Banhart. “It’s a good thing to foster, rather than the usual thing where the older you get the more closed off you are to new things and change. That’s really frightening.”

Another thing that initially put a lil’ scare into Banhart was signing with Warner Bros. Records after years of putting out his work on independent labels. However, now that the album is done and entering the world he’s more blase about hitting the big leagues.

“First off, what the fuck are these guys thinking? [laughs]. Have they listened to my music, which has the least commercial prospects in the world? My attitude is they’re this suffocating behemoth in its last days, but they seem interested,” observes Banhart wryly.

One theory is the mainstream recording industry may be in a state of flux similar to the early 1970s, where a lot of interesting music was bankrolled by major labels simply because they had no real idea what would sell at that moment and wanted to throw as much up against the wall as they could. As aromatic abstract art goes, Banhart rates, and he’s developed a healthy following doing what he does, not so much oblivious of or consciously angled against the mainstream, but simply running along an entirely different groove. If the mega-labels once embraced hyper-weirdoes like Captain Beefheart, The Bonzo Dog Band, and Roy Harper, well, maybe they can find love in their hearts for a gentle iconoclast like Banhart. It also doesn’t hurt, from a major record label perspective, that Banhart’s profile in recent years makes him a cultural figure that’s known by some simply for his name and image without any connection to his music.

Devendra Banhart by Lauren Dukoff

“Something that leaves a sour taste in my mouth is people who are well known but you have no idea why. It’s so strange how excited we are to be around a person that’s famous. Then later, hopefully we step back and ask, ‘Why are they known? Did they fuck a donkey on tape once?’” says Banhart, slicing to the heart of our vacuous star-fucker culture that’s sadly caught him in its slipstream. “Yes, but I’m not involved in that world. For a second there when I first started dating Natalie [Portman, actress/Star Wars celeb] I was shocked at how I was perceived from her side of the world – a world she really isn’t part of but comes with the territory. In reality, all we do is talk about etymology and go on hikes. That’s the reality of our lives, and we’re still very intimate, close friends. But the way I was perceived in the world she works in was very shocking to me. It was a lot of bitterness, anger, and judgment. That’s why I stopped looking at reviews or articles about me of any kind, because there was this shift that occurred with the last record in the music world, where it went from actually talking about the music to making a bunch of presumptions about me.”

At heart, Devendra Banhart is an omnivorous lover of music that crafts new partners (i.e. songs) for us to canoodle with. His approach, attitude, and general countenance are a joyous, slightly troubled one. He seems nervous – and perhaps rightfully so – that beauty and simple truths offered without irony or subtext may not fit with the cynical, ironic age we find ourselves in. He is humble about his own talents and contributions, and gushing with praise for musicians he adores. He is kind and scattered and fabulously charismatic. These things are not presumptions but firsthand observations from the hours I’ve spent with him, and all these traits, in one way or another, surface on What Will We Be, whose creator is asking himself the same question that he poses to the listener. Only he’s cool (and wise) enough to descend into his reverie on the slinky heels of rich ancestors like Roxy Music, who get name checked on the new album with “16 & Valencia Roxy Music.”

“I had to put Roxy Music in the title, not only because we essentially ripped off the chorus from ‘Love Is The Drug,’ but also because it’s not really my kind of song. It’s a seriously ‘pop’ song, and I was a little embarrassed about it actually. But it captures the feeling of walking down 16th towards Valencia [in San Francisco], which is the apex of drugs and sex and salacious, seedy, tantalizing urchins. Whatever your kick is you’ll find it, at least that’s the invitation of this seductive, beguiling underbelly. It’s a crossroads,” says Banhart. “It’s so exciting as I approach it, and I think, ‘I’m gonna get high. I’m gonna get laid.’ And ‘Love Is The Drug’ or ‘In Every Dream House A Heartache’ is playing in my headphones, and of course, like every time I wander into this crossroads, I go home and I’m not high and I certainly haven’t gotten laid. I think it’s really funny, and that’s why that chorus ends with, ‘Ain’t gonna find a lover/ Ain’t gonna find a man.’ We so rarely come out the other side having gotten what we expected.”


Some footage of us while we were recording!!!!

Devendra Banhart tour dates available here.

JamBase | Lookout Point
Go See Live Music!


Digital TV Software Eliminating Pay TV Posted By : Greg Davids

By using digital TV software you will gain access to cable and satellite TV channels through your computer for free. However before using any digital TV software there are some points you need to be aware of.

“Real Housewives” Nene Leakes Gretchen Rossi Do Lunch

Two of Bravo’s “Real Housewives” shared sandwiches — and smooches in sunny California on Monday. NeNe Leakes, of The Real Housewives of Atlanta, and her hubby Greg joined The Real Housewives from Orange County’s Gretchen Rossi and her beau Slade Smiley for lunch in Beverly Hills this week. When the women weren’t locking lips with [...]

Celeb Baby News!!!

Celebrity baby news!!!

Colin Farrell, who is currently in Toronto to promote his movie Ondine at the Toronto International Film Festival, has told press in T-dot that he is expecting his second child! The actor has impregnated Polish actress Alicja Bachleda. The couple have been dating for almost a year. Colin has a 6 year old [...]

Armstrong hits back at Contador

Alberto Contador and Lance Armstrong

Tour de France winner Alberto Contador has launched a stinging attack on Astana team-mate Lance Armstrong.

The 26-year-old Spaniard won his second Tour title in Paris on Sunday, with American Armstrong finishing third.

"My relationship with Lance Armstrong is zero," Contador told a news conference in Madrid.

"He is a great rider but it is another thing on a personal level, where I have never had great admiration for him and I never will."

The 26-year-old Spaniard was the strongest rider in the mountains and in the time trials and eventually beat Andy Schleck into second place by four minutes 11 seconds, with Armstrong third at 5:24 back and Briton Bradley Wiggins in fourth, 6:01 adrift.

There were regular reports of tension between Armstrong and Contador throughout the event, with the 37-year-old seven-time champion – making his first appearance in the race since 2005 – often criticising his Astana team-mate’s strategy.

"Contador is that good, so I don’t see how I would have been higher than that, even in the other years"

Lance Armstrong

Contador admitted relations between the two were strained throughout.

"The situation was tense and delicate because the relationship between myself and Lance extended to the rest of the staff," he said.

"On this Tour, the days in the hotel were harder than the those on the road."

Contador, who missed last year’s Tour after Astana were not invited because of their past doping record, refused to be drawn on his future but it seems unlikely to lie with Astana.

"We’ll have to see what happens," he said. "I don’t know where I will go but it will clearly be with a team that is 100% behind me."

Armstrong had earlier hailed his team-mate’s abilities, claiming Contador is so good the Spaniard would have beaten him in his own heyday.

"I think this year’s performance would have beaten my performances in 2001, 2004 and 2005," said Armstrong.

"Contador is that good, so I don’t see how I would have been higher than that, even in the other years."

606: DEBATE

"Hats off to Contador and Andy Schleck"

mainz341

With Armstrong set to return to the Tour next year with his new Team RadioShack, the two will no longer have to hide their rivalry amid the constraints of being team-mates.

Race organiser Christian Prudhomme is among those relishing the prospect of another vintage race in 2010.

"We need duels in sport, like (Rafael) Nadal v (Roger) Federer or (Bernard) Hinault v (Greg) LeMond," he said.

"We haven’t decided which teams will be invited next year but, looking ahead, a team with Contador, another with Armstrong and another one with the Schleck brothers (Andy and Frank) would be sensational."

Andy Schleck, the younger of the Luxembourg brothers who twice previously won the Tour’s white jersey awarded to its best rider under 25, has already sent Contador a warning.

"I’m coming back to take the yellow jersey," said the 24-year-old.

"Alberto showed this year that he was the strongest, the real boss of the peloton. I have much respect for him, but next year I’m coming to win."

After a number of doping scandals to have hit the Tour in recent years, including the disqualification of 2006 winner Floyd Landis after testing positive for testosterone, the 2009 event passed without incident, pending the final test results.

Three years ago pre-race favourites Ivan Basso and Jan Ullrich were ejected because of their links to the ‘Operation Puerto’ doping affair in Spain and a year later Astana were disqualified after leader Alexandre Vinokourov tested positive for blood doping.

"Coming through the Tour without having to deal with scandal was pleasing," Prudhomme added.

"There will be other (positive) cases, that’s just the way it is in sport. But I really think things are changing. The targeting of riders and the (biological) passport means that nowadays it is far more difficult to cheat and get away with it."

After his victory on Sunday following almost 3,500km of racing over 21 stages in three weeks, Contador added: "I’m happy to win a Tour de France that has so far been clean.

"I get tested all year long. I make myself available 365 days a year, and I do it willingly. There has been huge investment to fight doping in the sport and for me it’s a good thing."

He also admitted the race had been a tough one and that his celebrations would reflect his efforts in the event.

"This Tour was very difficult as you could see and although it sometimes seems easy on television it wasn’t because of other factors. I will enjoy this second Tour win as if it was a double victory," he said. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Greg Archer: That Cronkite School of Journalism — An ASU Alum Looks Back

I can’t help but wonder what that solid, creative titan of a man would have thought of 21st century broadcast media (and some print media) before he passed on.

Greg Mitchell: Cronkite’s 1968 Dissent on Vietnam Helped Save Thousands of Lives

I probably missed the late Walter Cronkite’s most important TV news moment: his famous February 1968 commentary after returning from Vietnam in which he cast strong doubt on our mission there and its chances for success.

Spy gave shuttle secrets to China

The space shuttle blasts off, 15 July

A Chinese-born engineer in the United States has been found guilty of passing space shuttle technology secrets to China, for more than 30 years.

Dongfan "Greg" Chung, 73, is the first person to be found guilty under a federal law, introduced in 1996, to counter economic espionage.

Mr Chung worked for Rockwell International, and then Boeing, until the FBI investigation began in 2006.

He will be sentenced in November, and could spend decades in prison.

A court statement said the judge in California had found Chung guilty of economic espionage, acting as a foreign agent and making false statements to the FBI.

The trial began on 2 June.

Public domain

Chung, a naturalised American citizen, worked at Rockwell International from 1973. Rockwell’s defence and space unit was taken over by Boeing in 1996.

Chung’s defence team admitted that he took Boeing papers home, but said he had wanted the information so he could write a book.

All the information he had given to China, they said, was already in the public domain.

His lawyer Thomas H Bienert told the court: "Mr Chung walked an interesting line, and a risky line, but not a line that was criminal."

The defence team says it will appeal against the verdict.

Chung is to remain in custody until his sentencing on 9 November. He could face up to 90 years in jail.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Frank Gruber: A Fourth Urbanism, Part 4: More on the “Why” of Cityism

Because the rebuilding of cities is so important, the effort to do so, if that effort is based on recognizable principles, deserves recognition as something special.

Joining Publish2: Ryan Sholin, Greg Linch and Howard Weaver

Today we’re announcing three major additions to the Publish2 team — journalists whose stellar reputations speak for themselves:

Ryan Sholin joins us next week as Director of News Innovation.
Greg Linch is the winner of the Publish2 Future of Journalism Contest and will join us in the fall as our Producer.
Howard Weaver has joined our Board of [...]

How Newspapers Abdicated the Front Page’s Influence and How They Can Get it Back By Linking

The front page of the newspaper used to set the news agenda. Extra, Extra, read all about it! But that influence has steadily waned through the TV and Cable News era, and the web now threatens to obliterate it entirely.
So who sets the news agenda now? One significant influence is a guy with nothing but [...]