RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘health care reforms’

Obama’s `change’ runs up against Washington culture

More than one million people braved bitter cold and long, pre-dawn lines for the inauguration of a US president who promised to change “business-as-usual” in Washington and heal the wounds of a sharply divided country.
Barack Obama entered office with sky-high expectations on the heels of his deeply unpopular predecessor, George W. Bush. In his inaugural [...]

The cost of good health

Where health-care spending is heaviest

HEALTH-CARE spending will consume 15.5% of the GDP in North America this year, the largest share of six regions worldwide. Record levels of public debt in America will limit the scope of health-care reforms set for 2010. Meanwhile, global life expectancy will reach 72.5 years, bringing the number of people aged 65 and over to 523m, or 7.6% of the population. This will reduce the amount of tax available to fund health-care systems everywhere, prompting governments and insurers to focus on public health, preventive care and other money-saving measures.

Nearer and nearer

A procedural vote in America’s Senate brings Barack Obama’s health-care reforms closer

IT NOW looks certain that Barack Obama will get what he wanted for Christmas—a health-care reform bill passed out of the Senate, probably just a few hours before Santa begins his rounds. Republicans, who have been fighting tooth-and-nail to block passage of the bill seem to have given up the fight, and have given warning instead that this will be a wish that he comes to regret.

Shortly after 1am on Monday December 21st, the health bill cleared the first, and the most difficult, of the procedural hurdles it has to leap in order to secure passage through the Senate. Technically only a motion to end debate on a “manager’s amendment” put together by the Senate’s majority leader, Harry Reid, what the vote really represented was a crucial exercise in nose-counting. The result was a vote on precisely partisan lines, with all 40 Republicans opposed, and all 58 Democrats plus the two independents who are grouped with them voting in favour. Since 60 votes is the precise number needed to avoid a filibuster, there was no room for error whatsoever, the reason why the procedural motion had taken so long. But with all 60 members of the “Democratic caucus” now signed up, the final vote, on Christmas Eve, looks like a formality. …