RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘John Cale’

Where Do Ideas Come From?

Where Do Ideas Come From?

Since publishing a series of posts on dating and living in the last couple of weeks, I’ve been asked several times how I came up with the idea to see dating as a kind of metaphor for life. The immediate source of the story was pretty mundane – someone asked me a question about another article and I used going on a date as an example to illustrate my answer, and thought “hey, there might be something to this more generally!”

But the response to those stories has gotten me thinking about ideas and creativity more generally. Writers are asked all the time about where we get our ideas. So are musicians, painters, actors, designers, and other creative people. It’s a source of fascination for many, who perhaps see in the talent of others something they feel is missing from themselves.

Interestingly, most of the creative people I know don’t see their creative impulses as particularly exclusive. What separates the creative from the not-so-creative isn’t so much the ability to come up with ideas but the ability to trust them, or to trust ourselves to realize them. That trust lies at least in part in knowing we have the skills to bring forth a finished product from an initial idea, which is why so many creative people tend to take a craftsman’s (or woman’s) approach towards their work (and resent those who squander their ideas by refusing to do the groundwork needed to make them real), but skill is only part of it. There are plenty of skilled but not-particularly-creative people – hacks – in every field. What separates the creative from the not-so-creative is the willingness to take risks with ideas, to push both the idea and the self beyond the safe and comfortable.

There are two schools of thought about where ideas come from. One is the “artist as antenna” concept, in which ideas float in some barely perceptible aether waiting for someone to pick them up, the way a radio picks up a song when it’s tuned to just the right frequency. This is Keith Richards waking up in the middle of the night with the main riff from “Satisfaction” fully-formed in his head.

The second school holds that ideas are the product of hard work and thoughtful concentration. “It’s just work,” says Andy Warhol to Lou Reed about songwriting in Reed’s album, with John Cale, Songs for Drella. Sit down with a pad and pencil and think, and don’t get up until you have something! This school is the writer grinding out his or her 4 pages a day, the mad poet storming up and down the street in search of the perfect word to express exactly what s/he’s feeling, and the designer who sits down with a brief and just starts working.

The reality is probably somewhere in the middle – we get ideas from within ourselves and from without, or more to the point, from the interaction of the two. It is in the active engagement of the artist with his or her world, through preparation, conscious attention, curiosity, effort, and a dash of serendipity, that ideas are born:

  • Preparation: Ideas come to those who are prepared to receive them, whatever the origin. Scientists have ideas about science, not poetry – unless they have also practiced at the craft of poetry. And vice-versa – it’s the rare poet who is struck by an idea that advances our understanding of molecular biology. Skillful musicians have ideas that translate into beautiful songs, and skillful writers create daring novels that illuminate our lives. Those who haven’t prepared themselves to be creative rarely are.
  • Attention: Paying attention to the world around us – whether the immediate activities of people in our vicinity or the distant events reported through the media, or anywhere in between – is one source of ideas. You’ve heard the saying that “necessity is the other of invention” but it also takes someone paying close enough attention to recognize that need in the first place.
  • Curiosity: Creativity often comes from the drive to understand and take things apart, literally or figuratively. It stems from the desire to know “what if…” and to follow that question until it gets somewhere interesting.
  • Effort: Whether you’re the antenna or the bricklayer, creativity takes a commitment to work. “Ideas are cheap,” the saying goes. “Execution is hard.” Ideas need to be captured, given attention, followed up on, and committed to a plan of action, or they disappear back to wherever they came – whether “out there” or deep in your unconscious mind. And they rarely come back.
  • Serendipity: Serendipity is two things. First, it’s the luck to be at the right place at the right time, to be Newton at exactly the moment the apple falls from the tree. The second is the openness to making connections between unrelated things or events – to see in a bathtub a lesson about physics, or to see in a date a lesson about life.

These elements of creativity all play together, of course. How many millions of baths were taken before Archimedes had his “Eureka!” moment? Yet it was Archimedes who was prepared to understand what it meant when he climbed into his bath and saw the water level rise, Archimedes who paid attention to what he saw, Archimedes who was curious enough to wonder what was happening, Archimedes who was willing to do the follow-up work to translate his experience into a general principle about volume and displacement, and Archimedes who just happened to bring all this with him into the bath on that fateful day.

The thing is, these are all things each and every one of us can cultivate in her or his own life. They aren’t God-given gifts reserved to the few. And they apply well beyond the world of the arts – marketers, parents, teachers, factory workers, salespersons, electricians, computer programmers, and just about everyone else face situations that call for creative responses, though we often miss them for lack of preparation, attention, curiosity, effort, or serendipity. Start making a conscious effort to develop these elements, though, and I bet you’ll start engaging with your world more creatively in short order.


Dustin M. Wax is a freelance writer and project manager at Stepcase Lifehack. He is also the creator of The Writer’s Technology Companion, a site devoted to the tools of the writing trade. When he’s not writing, he teaches anthropology and gender studies in Las Vegas, NV. He is the author of Don’t Be Stupid: A Guide to Learning, Studying, and Succeeding at College.

Follow him on Twitter: @dwax.


The Warlocks | 08.14 | NYC

Words & Images by: Alex Borsody

The Warlocks :: 08.14.09 :: The Bowery Ballroom :: New York, NY

The Warlocks :: 08.14 :: NYC

The Warlocks have been playing for over ten years, surviving lineup changes with the one constant being frontman Bobby Hecksher. I caught the band just off the U.K./France leg of their tour, supporting their new album, The Mirror Explodes (released May 19 on Tee Pee). What’s in a name? In this case, at least, something. The Warlocks was the original name for both the Grateful Dead and The Velvet Underground, two bands which helped define 1960′s music yet existed at opposite ends of the cultural spectrum. The Velvet Underground was similar to The Doors in rejecting the hippie lifestyle, preferring a darker, more urban mystique. Brian Eno sums up their influence on modern music: “Despite hardly anyone buying this album [The Velvet Underground and Nico] on its release, everyone that did buy it seemed to have formed a band.” On the other end, the earthy Grateful Dead were equally influential, being responsible in large part for the entire jam band scene.

So, the band name The Warlocks has quite the legacy and is evocative for many people. You only need see The Warlocks perform to notice the Velvets influence; their dark sunglasses and somber expressions bring back memories of NYC’s original hipsters. Songs off this night’s setlist that were most obviously influenced by VU include “Song for Nico,” “Shake the Dope Out” and “The Dope Feels Good.” The link can be heard clearly in their live sound, which evokes the dark, bi-polar landscapes of Live at Max’s Kansas City.

The Warlocks :: 08.14 :: NYC

The Bowery Ballroom is one of NYC’s many strange and beautiful venues. There is a bar downstairs with the concert hall upstairs, and the clientele are low-key rocker types who wear a lot of black. The opening band, The Morning After Girls, put on a powerful performance, projecting a very genuine energy. The band obviously cared a lot about their live show, and the lead singer was incredibly engaged and seemed to deliver music from his own private world. The sound was a familiar indie rock formula, but darker and with greater emotion.

The Warlocks took the stage around 11:30 p.m. and did not miss a single change or beat. Their sound was raw, and despite all my impulses to say otherwise, unpretentious. The singing was high energy, with tactful use of back-up harmonizing. The group had solid vocals, creating a sound that was very clean and exact, at times even giving things a studio mastered effect. The solos were experimental and unpredictable, and at one point I felt like one of the guitarists was channeling John Cale (the violinist/multi-instrumentalist for The Velvet Underground) with distorted and ambient screeching effects. Three guitarists, a bass player and a keyboardist are usually hard to keep so perfectly in sync.

The backstage area had a case of PBR on the floor across from a bottle of Makers Mark on the table – the art school combo. I asked the band why they chose their name and it seemed not to be too big of a deal for them, a simple nod to The Velvet Underground’s inspiration. I came to the show wondering if the band had known about the Grateful Dead connection but realized how narrow my taste in music had become. I had been overtaken by Phish/Dead mania and completely forgot about my childhood hero Lou Reed. The Warlock’s lead singer Bobby Hecksher is a soft spoken, androgynous character who seemed to be somewhat anxious, possibly due to the fact that he was one of the only ones not drunk in a room full of intoxicated people. As he came out from behind his dark sunglasses, I asked him if he had ever met Lou Reed. He said, “It would probably be a weird conversation.”

The Warlocks :: 08.14 :: NYC

The Warlocks and other similar sounding art rock bands are sometimes categorized as psychedelic rock. Wondering where this label came from, I asked people at the concert if they had ever done psychedelics, or if they thought that was a part of the culture surrounding the music. The resounding answer was no, so this appeared to have little to do with it. It seemed ironic on the 40th anniversary of Woodstock that a band with the Grateful Dead’s original name was billed as psychedelic rock. To top it all off I had skipped a local Phish show to see something new at this concert. The band talked about being from the West Coast, where the real hippies actually listen to art rock. Today’s psychedelic rock often sounds like U.K. pop bands from the 1960s, and the guy who coined the term “psych rock” came from Texas, so the roots of the sound are hard to pin down or understand anyway.

There was an accepting and non-egotistical atmosphere at the concert. Fans were standing around looking somber and subdued, which seemed perfectly normal. No one was jumping up and down in catharsis as a musician’s fingers began to start a fire on the fretboard. Because of this, The Warlocks, especially in their later work, have been described as shoegazers, a genre named after people who go to concerts and stare at their shoes while nodding to the rhythm. In the end, music is music, and by dividing genres and subcultures into target markets it only suppresses artistic expression.

JamBase | Loaded
Go See Live Music!