ISLAMABAD –Issuing its verdict in the PCO judges case, the Supreme Court on Wednesday decided to go ahead with contempt of court proceedings and summoned nine of the judges for 21 February.
However, the court rejected the plea to indict the officials, including generals, who were instrumental in the promulgation of 3 November, 2007 Emergency. The court noted that the two matters are different, and could be heard independent of each other.
The court decided to spare Justice Zafar Iqbal Chaudhary and Justice Khurshid Anwar Bhindar since they were not judges of the Lahore High Court on 3 November, 2007 when Emergency was imposed and the apex court had restrained all judges from taking oath under the PCO moments after.
The SC was dealing with the law point whether it could initiate contempt proceedings against the judges who took oath under the PCO, and if it could issue contempt notices to generals involved in the promulgation of Emergency in the country in defiance of a seven-member apex court benchÂ’s restraining order.
The four-member bench comprising Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui, Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, Justice Tariq Parvez and Justice Khilji Arif Hussain had reserved on January 26 the verdict on the PCO judges case and related petitions.
While the bench rejected the plea to indict all, it appealed to Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry to constitute a separate bench to hear a petition that requested contempt notices against former president Pervez Musharraf, former premier Shaukat Aziz and the corps commanders.
The court decided to proceed against the judges by framing contempt charges on 21 February as they had taken oaths under the annulled PCO. The verdict was announced by Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui, who headed the bench.
When the Emergency was promulgated, there were 17 permanent judges, including CJP, and one ad hoc judge of the Supreme Court. Out of these 18 judges four judges – Justice (retd) Abdul Hameed Dogar, Justice (retd) Mohammad Nawaz Abbasey, Justice (retd) Faqir Mohammad Khokhar and Justice (retd) Mohammad Javed Buttar chose to take oath on 3 November, 2007 while Justice (retd) Syed Saeed Ashhad took oath on 4 November. Besides them some of the judges in the High Court of the provinces also took oath under the PCO.
The SC has been hearing contempt petitions against Justice (retd) Abdul Hameed Dogar, former chief justice of the Supreme Court; Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry, former chief justice of the Lahore High Court; and eight sitting judges – Justice Syed Zahid Hussain of the SC and Justices Khurshid Anwar Bhindar, Hamid Ali Shah, Zafar Iqbal Chaudhry, Hasnat Ahmed Khan, Syed Shabbar Raza Rizvi, Yasmin Abbasey and Jehan Zaib Rahim of high courts.
Posts Tagged ‘judges’
Former Serbian FA chief to face judges
The trial of former Serbian Football Association (FSS) President Zvezdan Terzić will start in Belgrade today. Terzić is the first football official to face charges of stealing money from player transfers.
Joy Behar, Marc Cherry, Tony Dovolani Miss America 2011 Pageant Judges
Miss America Caressa Cameron dropped by The View Wednesday with a very unlikely announcement for viewers: Wisecracking comedienne Joy Behar has been tapped to judge next month’s 2011 Miss America Pageant in Las Vegas. The Emmy-winning Behar will join a panel of seven celebs tapped to select the beauty queen who will accept the tiara [...]
“All appointments of judges will be reexamined”
Justice Minister Snežana Malović said on Monday that every appointment of judges will be reexamined. This will come after the permanent members of the High Judicial Council have been appointed, according to her.
Debate on appeals of unelected judges
Constitutional Court President Bosa Nenadić says she hopes the court would make a decision on the appeals of judges and prosecutors who were not reelected. Nenadić made the comments on Monday in Belgrade, and stated that she expected this decision to happen within a reasonable time-frame.
1 of the 2 Administrative Judges at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Vowed NEVER to Let a Complainant Win. He’s Kept His Promise for 20 Years
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is an important agency. It is largely responsible for regulating derivatives and other important instruments.It is supposed to prevent and prosecute fraud.So it is stunning that one of the two administra…
Withdrawal of judges restoration order to sabotage Constitution: SC
ISLAMABAD – After hearing the judges’ notification case the whole day, the Supreme Court on Friday observed that the Chief Executive’s order has lost its efficacy, therefore, it can’t be restored and if such attempt is made it will be tantamount to throttling the judiciary and subverting the Constitution.
A 17-member in its short order regarding the withdrawal of judges’ restoration notification said: “No functionaries of the government including the head of state, head of government and any other functionary can restore or take any step for withdrawing the March 16, 2009 notification.” The SC verdict cautioned if such move was made, then it would tantamount to violating the Article 6 of the Constitution.
Attorney General of Pakistan Maulvi Anwar-ul-Haq was asked to submit a written statement signed by higher authority, not other than by the Premier himself, about the government’s policy on withdrawing the notification of judges’ restoration. The AG sought more time to file the response, saying Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani was busy in some official engagements and could not spare time to write down the policy. He, however, said that the message has been conveyed to the Principal Secretary of the PM.”
The government through the Prime Minister has been directed to conduct an inquiry that how the news of withdrawing the notification spread and who is responsible for it.
When no statement from the Prime Minister, terming the news wrong, could be placed before the court, the Chief Justice remarked; “The news is not wrong. You tell us otherwise we will tell you as we have the material.” He added: “We don’t want to expose anyone but are showing restraint.”
When the bench asked the AG whether he has met the Prime Minister, his response was ‘No’. Justice Sair Ali expressed displeasure and asked what sort of meeting the Premier was attending that he even can’t spare two minutes.
Justice Asif Khan Khosa told the AG, “Your reluctance put fuel to the fire as it is not without the reasons because there was threat to the Constitution. He said that the statement could not be made that the Constitution will be followed. Justice Jawwad said that the executive order for the restoration of judges is “scrape of paper.” Every organ of the state has to abide by the Constitution.
Justice Saqib Nisar said that after the judgement in case of Sindh High Court Bar Association the executive order of March 16, 2009 has lost the efficacy. Is someone telling the Prime Minister about the complication and the implication of Article 6 of the Constitution?
The Chief Justice of Pakistan, judges of Supreme Court and the chief justices and judges of High Courts were restored through the executive order but it was not endorsed by the Parliament. But on July 31 the Supreme Court in Sindh High Court Bar Association case had passed a judgment and declared illegal all the actions of General (Retd) Pervez Musharraf taken on November 3, 2007 and later.
Prime Minister Gilani himself had stated in the Parliament, “Judges were restored through executive order, which has not been sanctified by the Parliament.” The private TV channels aired the news and the denial was issued from the PM, saying that there was no truth in it and that the government has no intention to withdraw the notification.
The court observed that despite that the news was flashed on private TV channels that the government with the consultation of the most senior lawyer of the country and the law minister has decided to withdraw the notification.
It happened so many times when the high profile cases were heard by the court and also before and after the October 13 when the NRO case was heard by the SC the news of withdrawing the notification was discussed.
During the proceeding, the Attorney General was questioned that after judgment in SHCBA case what authority was left to the government to withdraw the notification, but he could not satisfactorily answer the queries.
Before the interval proceedings, Attorney General for Pakistan Maulvi Abwarul Haq submitted that the government does not have any intension to withdraw the notification of the restoration of the judges of the superior court and further said that mala fide is being presumed through the news report, aired on various TV channels.
Justice Saqib Nisar asked the AG to give his statement in order to finish the mala fide and the government will issue the statement then.
Justice Javed Iqbal said that the then Attorney General in MusharrafÂ’s era had also made such a statement that nothing will happen but the next date judges were sacked and confined them in their houses. He said that the court had given full chance to the government in NRO case and today too we are giving you a chance to contact the government.
“We are also patriotic like other citizens of the country and if someone has any complaint against any judge than Article 209 of the constitution could deal it,” Justice Javed said.
He further said that the apex court was taking steps as billions of rupees corruption is being made and if anyone violates the Constitution then Article 6 is there.
The AG replied that the apex court had shown grace on October 13 by giving time to the government. “We did not oblige anyone. We believe in the Constitution and we shall be run by rule of law and Constitution”, the Chief Justice remarked adding that action would be taken against those found guilty.
The Chief Justice further observed that literally the court is being abused but despite of that we are showing tolerance and we are here to strengthen and protect the institutions.
Meanwhile, the court directed Attorney General to produce before the court a written statement signed not other than by the premier himself about the governmentÂ’s policy regarding the notification of restoration of judges.
Qazi Anwar, President Supreme Court Bar Association, while appearing before the court submitted that in the first week of June the Prime Minister had made a statement saying that judges were restored by his own order and his order has not been validated by the Parliament.
Till yesterday morning, Qazi Anwar said that from Islamabad to Karachi there was a news circling of governmentÂ’s alleged standing against the judiciary.
Justice Arif Hussain Khilji remarked; “Are we sitting here under the Constitution or notification of Prime Minister?”
Qazi Anwar said that the government was bent upon testing nerves of the legal fraternity, however, he pledged that they would not allow anybody to hatch this kind of conspiracy.
“We were quite docile as Aitzaz Ahsan had filed an application on November I, 2007, fearing of happening something like this but we did not pay any heed to it and consequently we all were confined and thrown out of court”, Justice Khalil-ur Rehman Ramday observed. He said that having experience of the past, we can’t keep ourselves aloof any more.
Later, the hearing was adjourned till October 18 with the instruction that a clear-cut policy statement must be submitted on the next date of hearing.
EULEX judges in north K. Mitrovica
EULEX Deputy Head Roy Reeve said Monday that the EU mission has appointed seven of its judges to the court in northern Kosovska Mitrovica. According to him, this came in an attempt to reduce the number of unresolved cases, which has reached 20,000.
LDP slams judges joining SNS
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) Čedomir Jovanović says judges who joined the opposition Serb Progressive Party (SNS) were creating parallel institutions. Previously, SNS announced that hundreds of judges who were not reappointed in the judicial reform process joined its ranks.
New judges, prosecutors sworn in
Newly elected judges and deputy public prosecutions were sworn in before Parliament Speaker Slavica Äukić-Dejanović. These court officials were elected on July 28 on the proposal of the High Council for Courts and the State Prosecution’s Chamber.
EULEX: No date for return of judges
EULEX issued a statement in PriÅ¡tina today saying that there has been no date set for the return of judges to a court in northern Kosovska Mitrovica. The statement came from the EU mission in Kosovo, EULEX, chief Yves de Kermabon, saying it regarded “the return of Kosovo Albanian and Kosovo Serb judges and prosecutors to the (Kosovska) Mitrovica District Court”.
Kosovo Ministry against “unilateral reinstatement of judges”
Ministry for Kosovo State Secretary Oliver Ivanović says unilateral moves in reopening a Kosovska Mitrovica court could destabilize the situation there. The court is located in the northern, mostly Serb part of the volatile ethnically divided town.
Justice minister rules out new election of judges
Justice Minister Snežana Malović said that the decision of the Constitutional Court will be respected, but the election process of judges will not be repeated. She denied that the High Judicial Council began preparation for individual explanation of why certain judges were not reelected only after pressure from the European Union.
“Plan to bring back Serb judgesâ€
EULEX chief Yves de Kermabon says the project which will reintroduce Serb judges and prosecutors to the Kosovska Mitrovica District Court is nearing completion. The EU mission in the province, EULEX, has, according to him, been “discussing the legal issues with Belgradeâ€.
Serb judges proposed by EULEX unwelcome
The Kosovo Judicial Council wants “only the Serb judges not connected with the judicial system of Serbia” work in northern Kosovska Mitrovica. This is according to a report on Tuesday in PriÅ¡tina’s Albanian language daily Koha Ditore.
Photojournalism Award Judges Use Aperture
At the National Press Photographers Association annual Best of Photojournalism awards, the entire process of viewing and voting for images happened inside Aperture.
“No agreement on return of Serb judges”
A Serbian Ministry of Justice official today denied that an agreement was reached with EULEX on the return of local judges to a northern K. Mitrovica court. State Secretary with the Ministry of Justice Slobodan Homen also announced in Belgrade on Thursday that the talks would continue, “after fulfillment of certain principles”.



