RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Katine amref’

Cash offered for drought plans

Katine’s 18 farmers groups offered money to help cope with drought and food shortages affecting north-east Uganda

Katine farmers are being encouraged to apply for funds to support income generating ideas to improve livelihoods in the sub-county.

The African Medical and Research Foundation (Amref), which is implementing a three-year development project in the sub-county, with assistance from Farm-Africa, has put up UShs 18m (around US$8,700) to fund proposals submitted by the 18 farmers groups.

The move follows a drought in the region that has left crops destroyed and many families in dire need.

At the beginning of the season, the farmers groups, which cover around 540 households, were given seeds under the project’s livelihoods component. But erratic rainfalls have not produced the intended harvest.

Livelihoods project assistant David Ogwang says climate change had proved that it was “dangerous” to rely on giving farmers seeds. “We want to supply farmers with inputs as well as provide them with alternative income generating activities. That is why we have asked the farmers to submit their proposals stating the kind of enterprises they would want to run,” he said.

Each group has been allocated UShs 1m and has been invited to propose ways in which it could be spent. Amref is advising farmers on which enterprise to choose, according to the ability of each group to manage it, and will evaluate each proposal. Farmers will not be given the money directly. Amref will conduct any procurement involved.

The scheme will start off with affordable ventures, such as supporting farmers to buy hens, or goats. It would not run to the purchase of cattle. Ogwang says Amref would not consider such expensive ideas until it was sure the farmers were capable of taking care of the animals. Katine has no veterinary services, although the project has trained some animal health workers to help bridge the gap.

So far, most of the farmers’ proposals have been for funding for animals.

“We have nothing; all our crops have been destroyed by the drought. That is why we, as Ajobi farmers, are changing to sheep rearing. You know, the problem is that the project over emphasised farm inputs without considering the factor of climate. In farming there are two things with crops; you either lose or gain, but it’s not the case with rearing animals,” said Charles Otuba, the group’s vice-chairman.

Members of the Olwelai farmers group have applied for money to rear goats.

Olocoi’s farmers group wants to use the money to enhance its village savings and loans association (VSLA). The group’s chairman, Cornelius Onaba, says the decision to zero in on VSLAs follows a consensus that this could accelerate living standards more quickly.

“Each group is supposed to get UShs 1m to run enterprises of their choice, but this money is too little to cover all the 30 members of a [VSLA] group. So what we have agreed in our proposal is that we support our VSLA such that members are able to borrow money and use it to run their business. We also agreed that each member who borrows that money will have to pay certain interest. In this way we believe that the money would help us, rather than using it to buy goats,” Onaba said.

Whether Onaba’s plan is approved, however, is unclear. While Amref is interested in enhancing VSLAs, which are run in Katine by Care International and local NGO Uweso, the rules around these associations may not allow for extra money to be added.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Katine’s six-month progress review

Amref’s latest six-month report claims successes in school enrolment and health, but lack of drugs and the small number of farmers benefiting from livelihoods work remain challenges

Read the six-month report, financial review and the report highlights

Read Madeleine Bunting’s mid-term review of the Katine project

The number of children in school has risen by 17% and diarrhoea cases in children under five years old have dropped dramatically, according to the latest six monthly update from the African Medical and Research Foundation (Amref) on the Katine project.

At the start of the project in October 2007 enrolment stood at 7,531 and it has now gone up to 9,071. Some of the increase is due to the expansion of two schools set up by their communities, but Amref claims this is a result of their work in the sub-county. Amref believes that the increase has seen many orphans and children with special needs getting into school; nearly 30% of school-age children in Katine fall into this category. The rise in school enrolment is a boost for the project, which has organised training for teachers over the last 18 months as well as contributing over 1,000 more textbooks and new desks. Classrooms and schools have been renovated or rebuilt and Amref claims there has been a drop in teacher absenteeism, an ongoing problem in remote rural areas, which badly affects educational achievement.

The decline in diarrhoea cases also marks a positive outcome for Amref’s strategy of community health workers, the report claims. The village health teams (VHTs) have been trained and motivated with gifts of bicycles, T-shirts and gumboots. Nine out of 10 patients at the health centre are now referred by the VHTs, which are working effectively to assist the management of a wide range of health conditions such as TB and HIV. But the report acknowledges that the lack of drugs to treat common illnesses such as malaria is hampering the success of the health teams. It reflects the government’s inadequate drug supply system across the country; Amref has insisted that the project’s aim should be to strengthen existing drug supply systems, but this is not proving effective. It is probably now the single biggest challenge of the three-year project. There are also not enough drugs to treat HIV and to prevent mother to child transmission. Other aspects of the health programme have also proved ineffective; the take up of contraceptive services has been tiny, reflecting strong cultural prejudices.

Other successes include a new laboratory at Ojom health centre, which can process tests for malaria, TB and HIV, the report states. Within the first six weeks of the lab opening, 790 patients had come for tests, usually for malaria and HIV indicating the enormous unmet demand for effective healthcare across the Katine sub-county. Another success is that there has been a sharp increase in the number of pregnant women coming for antenatal care – although few of them manage the recommended four visits. It is the long distances and inadequate transport that limits the number of visits a woman makes; it can be as much as 25km to reach the nearest health centre in the sub-county.

Given those distances, the improved immunisation rate – which has now more than doubled according to Amref’s report – is a big achievement. VHTs have played a major role in ensuring that the outreach clinics in schools and trading centres are well attended.

Amref has given some thought about how to deal with the resentments caused by the fact that only a small number of farmers are benefiting from free seeds and tools (about 540 out of the sub-county population of 25,000). Recipients will now be expected to pass on to neighbours a proportion of their first crops as a way of spreading the benefits.

The big challenge that lies ahead in the second half of the project, the report comments, is how to manage the high demands of the community and local government officials. In particular, the water and sanitation budget for hardware (as opposed to training) is exhausted, but there is still considerable demand to expand the services planned to build new boreholes.

There are a number of problems with construction; one contractor of a school at Kadinya has failed to finish the task and lawyers have had to be brought in, the report acknowledges. Some pipework on the rain harvesting has not been fitted properly; and a plastic panel latrine block was blown over in a storm and will now be rebuilt in brick. Construction work is due to begin at a number of other schools, but the more collaborative approach (with community donations of materials) has proved slow.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Reviewing Katine: governance

To mark the midway point of the Katine project, and ahead of mid-point reviews to be conducted by our independent evaluator and Amref, this week Madeleine Bunting examines progress in each of the project’s five components. In her final review she looks at governance.

Read Madeleine’s reviews of health, education, water and sanitation and livelihoods

Empowerment has been the strand of the project that us journalists have found the hardest to understand. What exactly is empowerment, and how is it going to be measured or evaluated? I’ve listened to Joshua Kyallo, Amref Uganda’s director, explain how villagers can be empowered to demand better services from the government at district level. But there are plenty of questions in my mind as to how effective this will be in improving the operation of state services in Katine.

The district budgets for health and education, for roads and water are desperately inadequate. It is not just the lack of demand for services that causes the state to be so ineffectual at village level here. I find the “rights-based” approach, based on developing in villagers a sense of entitlement to basic health and education, hard to understand. Katine may put more pressure on the district, but there are multiple problems at every level of Ugandan government; often the district can do very little.

There are other aspects of empowerment that also need to be questioned. I talked to a few Katine residents – not those recruited as volunteers by Amref – and the way they spoke seemed to indicate that Amref was well regarded, but there was no great enthusiasm. I felt that in some places there was a gentle disappointment settling in. Several of the Amref staff spoke of how they had struggled with huge expectations of the project from Katine villagers. Is that the Guardian’s fault, I asked, with its headlines promising “transformation”? Perhaps partly, they agreed.

I wondered how actively Amref has managed expectations and how widely it had communicated with villagers across this very scattered sub-county about what the project was going to do and what it was not going to do. Joseph Malinga’s story about the confusions in a particularly remote corner of the sub-county, Merok, seemed to point to an important breakdown in communications. How was it that this kind of misunderstanding was not corrected by Amref earlier?

There is a sense that Amref decided what it wanted to do in Katine and the extent to which local people – beyond the local government officials – have been involved in that strategy is unclear. There is clearly a tension here between giving people what is known to be good for them – hygiene training – or giving them what they keep asking for – cows. The only way to square this circle is constant communication and explanation and from the outside it is hard to see how well Amref is doing that.

The concern is that given the considerable demands the Guardian makes on Amref – for information and visits – the priority has been to communicate with London rather than the remote hamlets of Katine.

What we need to know

How well are local people being involved in the project?
How much say have they had in shaping its priorities?
Is Amref’s relationship with the Guardian distorting the project?
How does empowerment in the long run help deliver better services?

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds