RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Life and style’

Lic of india – LIC of India Recruitment

Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) invites application for 50 Direct Sales Executives (DSE), to be engaged by various offices of the corporation purely on contract basis.
Last date for receipt of Application Form together with Demand Draft towards application fees will be 23-7-2009.
Selection will be made on the basis of a written test if necessary, [...]

The girl who borrowed a heart

• Ten years with two hearts, then her own recovers
• 16-year-old leads full life after cancer and transplant

Her life used to consist of endless rounds of medicines, long stays in hospital and uncertainty about how much longer she would live for. Now 16-year-old Hannah Clark – the first person in Britain to receive someone else’s heart but later have it removed, only for her own to unexpectedly recover – relishes typical teenage pursuits such as running, shopping and walking her dog.

Born with a rare heart condition that could easily have killed her, Hannah, from Mountain Ash near Cardiff, was two when she joined an exclusive club by having a five-month-old girl’s heart grafted on to her own.

For 10 and a half years she had two hearts – “piggybacking”, doctors call it – although it was the donated heart that kept Hannah alive while her original organ took a long rest.

Complications meant the second heart had to be taken out when she was 12, and doctors were unsure what would happen. No one had survived such a procedure.

Now, three and a half years later, one of the most dramatic success stories in recent medical history has just done her GCSEs, started her first part-time job at a kennels and is preparing for a family holiday by the seaside – all powered by a heart which, for her first 12 years, doctors thought could not keep her alive.

Confirmation of Hannah’s highly unusual success in recovering from cardiomyopathy, which affects the heart’s muscle, comes today in the form of a long article in the Lancet medical journal.

In complicated medicalese, it tells an amazing story of survival. The authors, who include renowned heart surgeon Sir Magdi Yacoub, testify to the teenager’s feat.

Yesterday the girl who used to have two hearts negotiated another obstacle: a press conference to tell her story.

At times the constant whirring of cameras, barrage of questions and sheer number of people left her lost for words, or in tears.

How specially does she treasure life now, someone asked? “I can’t say,” replied Hannah. It took her mother, Liz, to answer: “She just loves life. She doesn’t think about tomorrow; she thinks about today, and lives life to the full. She gets up every morning smiling, and it’s very, very rare to see Hannah upset.

“She doesn’t go to bed until three o’clock in the morning sometimes … that’s how much energy she’s got. She couldn’t have done that before.”

Yacoub, of the Harefield hospital in west London, said her recovery had given the many doctors involved in her care insights into many things, such as transplant surgery and the use of immunosuppressant drugs, which must be taken to minimise the chances of a patient’s body rejecting a new organ.

Before Hannah, no one’s own heart had ever recovered enough to keep them alive, although doctors did think it was a theoretical possibility that a weak heart could somehow become strong.

Among the lessons learned from Hannah, Yacoub said, was that “the possibility of recovery of the heart is just like magic. A heart that was not contracting at all, after a time we put the new heart to pump next to it, and do its work. Now it is functioning normally. That is going to be very fundamental in helping people in the future.”

Born in 1993, Hannah underwent what surgeons call heterotopic cardiac transplantation, or “piggybacking”, two years later. However, the immunosuppressant drugs led to her developing an incurable, rare cancer that kept returning despite repeated bouts of chemotherapy.

But the doctors’ strategy, to reduce the doses of immunosuppressants, led to Hannah’s second heart failing. In February 2006, they decided they had no choice but to take it out, or risk Hannah’s death. Three and a half years of constant improvement, and Hannah’s gloriously normal life, have proved enough for them to pronounce the reversal of her transplant an unqualified, if unexpected, success.

Her father, Paul, recalled how when she was being treated at London’s Great Ormond Street hospital the family was told that Hannah was about to die.

“They called us in and said that a tumour had affected her spinal cord and was putting pressure on her brain, and was going to kill her. A nurse told us that she only had 12 hours to live. I said, ‘Well, you believe what you believe and I’ll believe what I believe’. For some reason, the next day she was OK.”

Their experience has made the Clark family advocates of presumed consent, a policy – supported by Gordon Brown and chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson – that would see everyone in the UK presumed to be in favour of donating their organs after death. Supporters believe that, with 1,000 people dying every year due to shortages, the move would greatly increase the supply of organs. Yacoub said that, having previously been opposed to presumed consent, he now backed it.

Survival story

1 May 1993 Hannah Clark born in Wales.

July 1995 Aged two, Hannah undergoes “piggybacking”, in which a donor heart is joined with her own. She improves for four and a half years.

August 2001 Hannah is found to have a rare form of cancer caused by immunosuppressant drugs that stop her body rejecting the new organ.

2001-2006 Her cancer keeps recurring. Doctors deem it incurable.

February 2006 Doctors decide to remove the donor heart.

14 July 2009 Hannah’s story reported in the Lancet.

  
  
  

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


‘Tumor’ Turns Out To Be Baby (VIDEO)

Author Alice Eve Cohen spoke with Harry Smith about the surprise of her life, when what she thought was a tumor turned out to be a baby.

Watch:

Watch CBS Videos Online

More on Video

John W. Whitehead: A Grief Observed: Remembering Carol

I now face the same questions that plagued C.S. Lewis. Why would a good God completely disembowel my life? How can I explain the massive hole in my soul left by my beloved?

Latest iPhone 3.0 Ailment Is Wi-Fi Connectivity

Apple’s iPhone OS 3.0 seems to be causing problems with Wi-Fi connectivity, according to reports. Also, iPhone 3GS users have been complaining about poor battery life and, in some instances, overly hot mobile devices. iPhone OS 3.1 is expected to cure what ails the Apple smartphone.
– The Apple iPhone OS 3.0′s latest ailment seems to be a difficulty connecting
to Wi-Fi, according to PC World, as well
as hundreds of readers on the Apple
discussion boards.

quot;After upgrading my 3G to 3.0 my Wi-Fi is not stable, particularly when
syncing a large database using FMTouch, …


Jen Grisanti: Writing Your Truth

Writing is a special and essential tool available to everyone that provides a cathartic opportunity to reflect on life, its evolutions, and our perspectives on it.

For Nicole Scherzinger, music is more important than sex

Nicole Scherzinger says music is more important to her than sex.
“Sex is not important to me but making love is… but music is more important. Having my relationship so much in the spotlight definitely makes things interesting,” Contactmusic quoted her as telling Britain’’s Observer newspaper.
The Pussycat Dolls singer also mentioned that she has been living [...]

Emma Watson says Pattinson is just a ‘good friend’

She might have worked with Hollywood heartthrob Robert Pattinson, but Harry Potter star Emma Watson denies any sparks ever flew within them.
While attending the Ziegfeld Theatre premiere of ‘Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince”, Watson admitted that she and Pattinson are “good friends”.
“He’s just a good friend!” the New York Daily News quoted Watson as [...]

Bella DePaulo: Marital Mentalities: The Changes are Historic, and We’re Living Them

I think this is a moment in social history that scholars and critics will be analyzing long into the future. There’s a lot of matrimania…

Kim Morgan: Be My Bloody Baby, Marty

I miss New York City. I miss the New York City I’ve never seen — the one I’ve only seen in movies. And after…

Don McNay: Powerball Jack, Michael Jackson, and Uncontrolled Wealth

Stop! the love you save may be your own. Darling, take it slow Or some day you’ll be all alone. -Jackson Five July 5,…

Rebecca Walker: The Untouchable Michael Jackson

We use his death, as we used his life, as a mirror. There is no room for Michael. It is still, tragically, all about us.

Obama In Ghana: ‘Africa Not Separate From World Affairs’

ACCRA, Ghana — An American president who has “the blood of Africa within me” praised and scolded the continent of his ancestors Saturday, asserting forces of tyranny and corruption must yield if Africa is to achieve its promise.

“Yes yo…

Kim Cattrall Discovers She Had A Bigamist Granddad

Kim set out to find about him. But her search through birth, marriage and census records reveals that, far from building a new life for himself abroad, as her family had suspected, her grandfather was living just 40 miles away in Manchester, a…

Tom Gregory: My opinion: Michael Jackson’s Grave (VIDEO)

Michael Jackson’s life has always been a contradiction of outlandish oddity and pinpoint perfection. Now in death, with the unknown location of his body, the…

Sharon Glassman: What is Work? Finding Your True Career in Life’s Second Act

There are no second acts in American lives, the tragic ol’ F. Scott Fitzgerald quotation goes. Cut your whining! The new careerists say, for a…

‘I’m blessed with a certain amnesia’

After his comeback to performing and Hallelujah’s unlikely chart domination, Leonard Cohen has had a remarkable year. He talks to Jian Ghomeshi about love, death and taking risks

What have you learned from being back on stage?

Leonard Cohen: I learned that it’s hard to teach an old dog new tricks. I’ve been grateful that it’s going well. You can’t ever guarantee that it’s going to continue doing well, because there’s a component that you really don’t command.

What component is that?

LC: Some sort of grace, some sort of luck. It’s hard to put your finger on it – you don’t really want to put your finger on it. But there is that mysterious component that makes for a memorable evening. You never really know whether you’re going to be able to be the person you want to be or that the audience is going to be hospitable to the person that they perceive. So there’s so many unknowns and so many mysteries connected – even when you’ve brought the show to a certain degree of excellence.

In 2001, you said to the Observer that you were at a stage of your life you refer to as the third act. You quoted Tennessee Williams saying: “Life is a fairly well-written play except for the third act.” You were 67 when you said that, you’re 74 now – does that ring more or less true for you still?

LC: Well, it’s well written, the beginning of the third act seems to be very well written. But the end of the third act, of course, is when the hero dies. My friend Irving Layton said about death: it’s not death that he’s worried about, it’s the preliminaries.

Are you worried about the preliminaries?

LC: Sure, every person ought to be.

Let me come back to the beginning of the first act. This was a brand new career for you that started in your 30s. How fearful were you of starting a second career?

LC: I’ve been generally fearful about everything, so this just fits in with the general sense of anxiety that I always experienced in my early life. When you say I had a career as a writer or a poet, that hardly begins to describe the modesty of the enterprise in Canada at that time – an edition of 200 was considered a bestseller in poems. At a certain point I realised that I’m going to have to buckle down and make a living. I’d written a couple of novels, and they’d been well received, but they’d sold about 3,000 copies. So I really had to do something, and the other thing I knew how to do was play guitar. So I was on my way down to Nashville – I thought maybe I could get a job. I love country music, maybe I’d get a job playing guitar. When I hit New York, I bumped into what later was called the folk-song renaissance. There were people like Dylan and Judy Collins and Joan Baez. And I hadn’t heard their work. So that touched me very much. I’d always been writing little songs myself, too, but I never thought there was any marketplace for them.

Some people would think it’s ironic to go into music to make money, given that it’s not necessarily the most lucrative of professions for most artists.

LC: Yeah, I know. In hindsight it seems to be the height of folly. You had to resolve your economic crisis by becoming a folk singer. And I had not much of a voice. I didn’t play that great guitar either. I don’t know how these things happen in life – luck has so much to do with success and failure.

People talk about the fact that you’ve written songs that you’ve almost grown into as you get older. How did starting a career in your 30s inform what you were writing?

LC: I always had a notion that I had a tiny garden to cultivate. I never thought I was really one of the big guys. And so the work that was in front of me was just to cultivate this tiny corner of the field that I thought I knew something about, which was something to do with self-investigation without self-indulgence. Just pure confession I never felt was really interesting. But confession filtered through a tradition of skill and hard work is interesting to me. So that was my tiny corner, and I just started writing about the things that I thought I knew about or wanted to find out about. That was how it began. I wanted the songs to sound like everybody else’s songs.

You say you’ve always been fearful of everything. When did you give yourself permission to think of yourself as, and call yourself, a legitimate singer and musician?

LC: You cycle through these feelings of anxiety and confidence. If something goes well in one’s life, one feels the benefits of the success. When something doesn’t go well, one feels remorse. So those activities persist in one’s life right to this moment.

Have the women in your life been a source of your strength or weakness?

LC: Good question. It’s not a level playing ground for either of us, for either the man or the woman. This is the most challenging activity that humans get into, which is love. You know, where we have the sense that we can’t live without love. That life has very little meaning without love. So we’re invited into this arena which is a very dangerous arena, where the possibilities of humiliation and failure are ample. So there’s no fixed lesson that one can learn, because the heart is always opening and closing, it’s always softening and hardening. We’re always experiencing joy or sadness. But there are lots of people who’ve closed down. And there are times in one’s life when one has to close down just to regroup.

Are there times when you’ve lamented the power that women have had over you?

LC: I never looked at it that way. There’s times when I’ve lamented, there’s times when I’ve rejoiced, there’s times when I’ve been deeply indifferent. You run through the whole gamut of experience. And most people have a woman in their heart, most men have a woman in their heart and most women have a man in their heart. There are people that don’t. But most of us cherish some sort of dream of surrender. But these are dreams and sometimes they’re defeated and sometimes they’re manifested.

Do you think love is empowering?

LC: It’s a ferocious activity, where you experience defeat and you experience acceptance and you experience exultation. And the affixed idea about it will definitely cause you a great deal of suffering. If you have the feeling that it’s going to be an easy ride, you’re going to be disappointed. If you have a feeling that it’s going to be hell all the way, you may be surprised.

Do you regret not having a lifelong partner?

LC: Non, je ne regrette rien. I’m blessed with a certain amount of amnesia and I really don’t remember what went down. I don’t review my life that way.

Even in the face of a very successful record that you made in 1992, The Future, do you think dealing with depression was an important part of your creative process?

LC: Well, it was a part of every process. The central activity of my days and nights was dealing with a prevailing sense of anxiety, anguish, distress. A background of anguish that prevailed.

How important was writing to your survival?

LC: It had a number of benefits. One was economic. It was not a luxury for me to write – it was a necessity. These times are very difficult to write in because the slogans are really jamming the airwaves – it’s something that goes beyond what has been called political correctness. It’s a kind of tyranny of posture. Those ideas are swarming through the air like locusts. And it’s difficult for the writer to determine what he really thinks about things. So in my own case I have to write the verse, and then see if it’s a slogan or not and then toss it. But I can’t toss it until I’ve worked on it and seen what it really is.

What do you consider your darkest hour?

LC: Well I wouldn’t tell you about it if I knew. Even to talk about oneself in a time like this is a kind of unwholesome luxury. I don’t think I’ve had a darkest hour compared to the dark hours that so many people are involved in right now. Large numbers of people are dodging bombs, having their nails pulled out in dungeons, facing starvation, disease. I mean large numbers of people. So I think that we’ve really got to be circumspect about how seriously we take our own anxieties today.

How much do you reflect upon your own mortality?

LC: You get a sense of it, you know – the body sends a number of messages to you as you get older. So I don’t know if it’s a matter of reflection, I don’t know that implies a kind of peaceful recognition of the situation.

Is there a way to prepare for death?

LC: Like with anything else, there’s a certain degree of free will. You put in your best efforts to prepare for anything. There are whole religious and spiritual methodologies that invite you to prepare for death. And you can embark upon them and embrace them and give themselves to you. But I don’t think there’s any guarantee this could work, because nobody knows what’s going to happen in the next moment.

Are you fearful of death?

LC: Everyone has to have a certain amount of anxiety about the conditions of one’s death. The actual circumstances, the pain involved, the affect on your heirs. But there’s so little that you can do about it. It’s best to relegate those concerns to the appropriate compartments of the mind and not let them inform all your activities. We’ve got to live our lives as if they’re not going to end immediately. So we have to live under those – some people might call them illusions.

Let me ask you about Hallelujah, because it’s been an interesting year for Hallelujah – it took on a new energy. A song that you wrote in 1984, and it appeared at No 1 and No 2 on the UK charts, and your version was also in the top 40. What did you make of that?

LC: I was happy that the song was being used, of course. There were certain ironic and amusing sidebars, because the record that it came from which was called Various Positions – [a] record Sony wouldn’t put out. They didn’t think it was good enough. It had songs like Dancing to the End of Love, Hallelujah, If It Be Your Will. So there was a mild sense of revenge that arose in my heart. But I was just reading a review of a movie called Watchmen that uses it, and the reviewer said “Can we please have a moratorium on Hallelujah in movies and television shows?” And I kind of feel the same way. I think it’s a good song, but I think too many people sing it.

• This is an edited transcript of an interview conducted for the Canadian broadcaster CBC. Leonard Cohen plays Mercedes Benz World in Weybridge, Surrey, tomorrow, and the Liverpool Arena on Tuesday. Leonard Cohen Live in London is out now on CD and DVD (Sony).

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


iPhone 3GS owners complain about the battery life

Some iPhone 3GS buyers were experiencing that their new Apple device has lower battery life, the Los Angeles Times reports, saying it “has trouble making it through a workday without a rest stop at the electrical outlet.”
Take Gary Ng, 27, one of them.
“If people are committing $1,000 a year for two years to use a [...]

Giving life a shape

Art gallery, AFP/Getty

Novel ways of thinking about the digital world are needed, says Bill Thompson, and perhaps the arts can help.

One of the more interesting shifts in the technology world over the last quarter century has been the way that cultural organisations have gone from being the late adopters, inheriting office-oriented computer systems from business and making do with them, to being those leading the digital revolution in many areas.

When I worked with the Community Computing Network in the late 80s it was hard work persuading charities and voluntary organisations that having a computer to handle their member databases and print letters was worthwhile.

But now that there really is a computer on every desk and word processing, spreadsheets and databases are standard, arts organisations seem to be far more willing to engage and experiment with the latest tools, especially online.

"We have few stories that talk about technology and few workable metaphors or analogies that let us convey complex technological issues in ways that people really grasp"

Bill Thompson

Bill Thompson

Many are making expert use of social media, moving from MySpace and Bebo to Facebook to follow the audiences, but also finding out how Twitter and other services can be used to help them engage and interact with people who may be interested in their art.

Stage craft

The much-loved Pilot Theatre brought in virtual worlds expert Caron Lyon to built them a stage set in Second Life. The team at Hoi Polloi used video diaries, Facebook and Twitter to establish an online following that has supported them as they tour from their Cambridge base as far afield as Australia, offering new audiences a chance to discover their work in all its strangeness while also ensuring that fans – including me – know what they are up to while they are away.

When it comes crossover organisations like Hide&Seek, who recently ran a social gaming festival in London, it is impossible to separate the art from the technology, and their work offers a real inspiration to those who wonder what the arts will look like in a digitised world.

This cross-fertilisation is important in several ways. It obviously makes sense for those committed to experiment and exploration in the arts to embrace new technologies as a way of exploring the creative potential of a new domain of human activity, just as painters explored the radical new technology of oils for for many decades, or sculptors turned from marble and limestone to work with welded iron or novel materials like frozen blood.

But there is something else going on, something deeper and potentially more important, because in working through the creative potential of new technologies artists of all types are helping us to find new ways to think about these tools and working out how to integrate them into our wider cultural and commercial practice.

They are helping us to explore the latest chapter in the ongoing conversation between human psychology and the capabilities of modern technology, something which will matter more and more as the network becomes pervasive and digital devices penetrate every area of our lives.

The point was made clear to me at Shift Happens, a conference on the ways arts organisations are using new technologies that took place this week at York Theatre Royal.

Over a day and a half the audience, mostly made up of practitioners, was treated to a fascinating selection of arts-based technology, or technology-based arts, from the interactive animations of the always-engaging Sancho Plan through calls to ensure that tech-based arts are environmentally sustainable from Envirodigital and a demonstration of how to subtitle your online video from Internet Subtitling.

Poster for The Tempest, BBC

It quickly became clear that the network revolution is already happening in the arts even if its success on the political stage is sometimes sadly limited, as we saw this week in Iran.

One problem in talking about this is that relatively few people understand the underlying technology sufficiently well to be comfortable with it. We have few stories that talk about technology and few workable metaphors or analogies that let us convey complex technological issues in ways that people really grasp.

Texting times

I wonder, however, if we can take some old stories and use them to explore the new world. Take The Tempest, for example, Shakespeare’s last play and one of his finest. Set on a remote island where Prospero, exiled Duke of Milan, lives with his daughter Miranda and a strange creature called Caliban, the Tempest explores issues of redemption and forgiveness and the use and abuse of power.

Prospero rules his island thanks the the spells in the books he has studied in his exile, commanding the spirit Ariel to torment and manipulate his former enemies, who have been shipwrecked on the island by a tempest created at Prospero’s command.

A modern reading this tale would see Ariel as a representative of the digital realm, created from bits but able to have a real effect on the physical world. We discover during the play that Ariel was locked into a forked tree until released by Prospero, a good analogy for the effort needed to liberate the power of the digital revolution, represented by Prospero’s books of spells.

We can take this further. The witch’s child Caliban believes himself the true inheritor of the island as his mother was banished there before Prospero arrived and fails to realise that Prospero’s books have given him power over the unseen world that far outstrip Caliban’s physical prowess, just as the rulers of analogue distribution fear the world we have conjured from our code.

And when Caliban, wandering the island with shipwrecked sailors Trinculo and Stephano, hears an invisible Ariel playing on a pipe he tells them:

Be not afeard. The isle is full of noises, Sounds and sweet airs that give delight and hurt not.

Today the thousand twangling instruments that Ariel and his sprites conjure up are replaced by millions of tweets, status updates, but they still fill the world with sweet sounds, and offer us a vision of a digital world that can be as rich and full of delight as we choose to make it. It’s reassuring to see that some of our best artists are working hard to make that happen.

Bill Thompson is an independent journalist and regular commentator on the BBC World Service programme Digital Planet.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Take Back Your Personal Power (Part 1)

Take Back Your Personal Power

“But I know What’s Best for You…”

Do you ever feel like you’re a mere pawn in someone else’s game; a powerless player that is regularly used, abused and manipulated for the gain and self interest of others? Self interest that’s often thinly disguised as some kind of action, decision or “plan” that’s somehow in your best interest? Isn’t it amazing how some people know what’s best for their life and yours? If only you and I had the ability to think and choose for ourselves; things could be so different. Have you ever felt like your life (or part of your life) has been taken hostage by someone else’s ego, insecurity and/or greed?

Welcome to a very large club.

Manipulators of the Masses

Perhaps you feel like you’re trapped in some kind of on-going poker game where you’re never dealt any decent cards. As a result you feel like you have no real power or leverage… just the occasional bluff. The truth is, knowingly or not, many of us have given away our personal power (or part thereof) and allowed situations, circumstances and other people to dictate, direct and control our reality for far too long. Some of us have let others tell us what we can do and what we can’t do. What we should think. What we should believe. Where we can go. Who we should spend time with. Why we’re here. What our future holds and even what our life purpose should be. And because on some level we all want acceptance, approval, connection, security and love (and a whole bunch more), far too often we compromise… and compromise… until we eventually lose the real “us” and become a simulated version of us: looks like you and me – but isn’t.

Surrendering of Self

Clearly this “surrendering of self” – that is dreams, goals, ideas, values, beliefs (not to be confused with the Christian notion of “dying to self”) – ain’t a great personal strategy for my life or yours. So if it’s all the same to you manipulators and self-centred control freaks, the rest of us will find our own life purpose, discover our own limits, explore our own potential and keep our personal power. Thanks anyway. Not.

“People can only take our personal power if we give it to them.”

Being a humble, generous and occasionally selfless individual is to be admired and respected but being a person who has essentially handed over the reigns of their life is tragic, sad and ultimately terminal. Someone who has given away their personal power is a person who has given away control, hope and happiness.

“It’s nice to be nice but it’s stupid to be a doormat”

Some people confuse feelings with reality. Not “feeling” powerful doesn’t necessarily equate to not “being” powerful. Unless we make it that. For the most part, feelings (read, fear) merely get in the way of our potential, personal power, growth and success. As a rule, our emotions and thoughts are in no way an indicator of our potential or the incredible future we might create and results we might produce if we should choose to use our power rather than give it away — as we have done in the past. Just because you don’t “feel” powerful or consider yourself to be powerful doesn’t mean that you’re not or you can’t be; it simply means you’re denying your potential and buying into a fear mindset. A feeling is only a feeling and a thought is only a thought until you make them a reality; good or bad.

“Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure.” Marianne Williamson

Just to clariff: I just re-read what I’ve written so far and I want to make a few things clear:

  1. We give away our power – people can’t take it without our permission;
  2. We allow people and things to have an unhealthy level of control and influence in our life;
  3. Getting angry, bitter and/or resentful at others will fix nothing – although it’s totally understandable;
  4. Positive change starts with awareness, understanding and acknowledgement; and
  5. The situation will change when you change – and you can change any time you like.

Now, is that me over-simplifying the complicated or you complicating the simple?

You decide.

The Last Bit…

Even as you read this right now, some of you might be rationalising your less-than-desirable existence and situation (1) to make yourselves feel better (thereby ignoring those buttons I just pushed) and (2) to avoid confronting the things you know you should deal with. My advice? STOP IT! Your world will change — when you do.

You have the ability, you have the understanding and you have the reasons – now find the courage.

Next time I will share some ideas to help you shift your reality from power-less to power-ful.

Peace.


Craig Harper (B.Ex.Sci.) is a qualified exercise scientist, author, columnist, radio presenter, television host, motivational speaker and university lecturer. For the past 25 years he has been a leading presenter, educator, motivator and commentator in the areas of personal and professional development. You can visit Craig’s blog at Motivational Speaker.

FREE eBook – So… You’ve Decided to Get in Shape (Again)
Craig’s FREE eBook takes 20 – 30 minutes to read, and addresses the REAL getting-in-shape issues based on his 25 years of experience. To get Craig’s FREE eBook click here, weight loss books.