RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Lord Mandelson’

UK facing largest Post Office strike in years

• More than 12,000 postal workers to walk out on Friday
• Strikers protesting against cuts at Royal Mail

Thousands of postal workers across the UK will go on strike on Friday in protest against cuts at Royal Mail, threatening the worst disruption to deliveries in years.

The action will be the latest stage in a series of strikes over jobs, pay and services, which have hit parts of the country in recent weeks and are now set to escalate into a national dispute.

The Communication Workers Union said more than 12,000 of its members in cities ranging from London and Edinburgh to Bristol and Plymouth would walk out for 24 hours.

The union has accused Royal Mail of cutting the pay and jobs of postal workers without agreement, while also reducing services.

On Friday afternoon, a letter and postcard will be delivered to Royal Mail’s chief executive, Adam Crozier, and business secretary Lord Mandelson. This will be followed by a national balloon release, with thousands of balloons rising above Royal Mail workplaces across the UK.

Dave Ward, the CWU deputy general secretary, said: “There are serious and growing problems in the postal sector which urgently need resolving. We have renewed our offer of a three-month no-strike deal to Royal Mail in return for meaningful talks over modernisation. The current cuts, bullying managers and ever increasing workloads on a shrinking workforce cannot continue. Pressure and stress is at breaking point for postal workers so we urgently need a fresh start for a modern Royal Mail.

“The national day of action on Friday is in response to an ever growing number of requests for industrial action from postal workers across the country who feel let down by Royal Mail management. We have almost 400 ballot requests at the moment with more coming daily. Without progress, this could effectively turn into a national strike.”

Last week, Mandelson accused the union of boycotting talks on Royal Mail modernisation. He insisted that it was “inconceivable” that the public would support a bailout of the Royal Mail’s £10bn pension fund deficit without the organisation agreeing to overhaul the way it works.

The CWU was fiercely opposed to the plans for partial privatisation of the Royal Mail that have now been abandoned, and Mandelson has accused it of adopting a “head in the sand” approach to modernisation.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Oleg Deripaska ‘may quit Britain’

By Tim Whewell
BBC Newsnight reporter

Oleg Deripaska

Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska has told the BBC he is considering breaking his connection with Britain.

"I’m not sure I will have any links with Britain in the future," he said in an exclusive interview with Newsnight.

The possible move follows the collapse of a Birmingham-based van firm Mr Deripaska once owned.

Last summer then EU trade commissioner Lord Mandelson and shadow chancellor George Osborne were involved in controversy after a party on his yacht.

Mr Deripaska was speaking as he took me on a personally-guided tour of his Russian industrial empire – the most extensive the publicity-shy tycoon has ever given a journalist.

One of Russia’s richest men, Mr Deripaska still owns a house bought for an estimated £25m ($40m) on one of London’s most exclusive squares.

"I wasn’t considering in those days whether they were British politicians. It was my summer holiday"

Oleg Deripaska on the "yachtgate" scandal

He said firmly that he still regards Lord Mandelson, now the business secretary, as his friend.

And he described their relationship as "good", asking: "Why should it have changed"

But he also told me: "I don’t understand your country.

"You have a lot of achievements, but at the moment you are in a kind of fire.

"You need to change so many things you inherited from the post-industrial economy – I just can’t see any benefit in what the media are doing with your politicians right now."

‘A good dinner’

He is particularly annoyed at the reporting of the party last summer including Lord Mandelson and the shadow chancellor, Mr Osborne, when his 72-metre yacht, the Queen K, was moored off Corfu.

Mr Deripaska said: "I wasn’t considering in those days whether they were British politicians. It was my summer holiday."

The Queen K yacht

"We had a good dinner, there were many people and I’m surprised they picked on these poor guys and screwed them in the press," he added.

The scandal erupted because Mr Deripaska controls most of Russia’s aluminium – and Lord Mandelson then oversaw EU metal tariffs.

I asked Mr Deripaska if he ever benefited from their relationship.

"Benefited from friendship" he asked indignantly. "It’s not my business. Whatever I did in my life, I did myself."

Lord Mandelson has already denied he did "any favours" for Mr Deripaska – and the EU commission has said a 2005 decision to remove punitive import tariffs on aluminium foil, that appeared to benefit Mr Deripaska’s company Rusal, was taken without Lord Mandelson’s personal intervention.

After the meeting in Corfu, George Osborne was accused by Mr Deripaska’s friend – the banker Nathaniel Rothschild, who was at also at the party, of having used the occasion to solicit a donation to the Conservative Party – a claim he has strongly denied.

Disappointment with Britain

Speaking about the allegations for the first time, Mr Deripaska said: "I tried to stay away from Russian politicians – why should I move towards British politicians

"I can’t see that anyone from Britain would ask me – it’s unbelievable."

George Osborne and Peter Mandelson

He says he has not been in Britain for more than a year and does not currently hold a British visa.

His disappointment with the country is fuelled partly by the failure to save LDV, the British van-maker he owned, from bankruptcy.

As the recession bit, his car company, GAZ, stopped funding the loss-making LDV and backed a management buy-out bid.

But hopes that the government might support the project with a substantial cash injection came to nothing.

After "yachtgate", did Mr Mandelson keep the Russian tycoon’s interests all the more firmly at arm’s length

It was Ian Pearson, the junior business minister, who spoke for the government on LDV, while his boss remained silent.

Perhaps, I suggested to Mr Deripaska, one reason LDV was not rescued was that politicians now feel they have to be over-careful in dealing with him.

"I know what the minimum level of life is – and anything extra looks like paradise"

Oleg Deripaska

"In this sense, it would be so wrong for the country," he answered.

"You have a good company, good people and complex manufacturing.

"There are only a few left in Britain — engineering companies that can support production — and based on a wrong press, someone could push them out of business. Why"

When pressed on whether the government should have bailed LDV out, he said simply: "It’s their decision – I can’t judge."

Disputed figures

For now, Mr Deripaska has wider problems than Britain.

According to Forbes magazine, his fortune has shrunk over the last year from £28bn to just £3.5bn.

Mr Deripaska disputes those figures, saying he was never as rich as has been claimed.

Oleg Deripaska

He said: "Whoever counted, it was based on assets only, in the most positive scenario."

He says he doesn’t know how much money he has, but he admits he took risks as his company, Basic Element, has diversified into more and more sectors including metals, cars, construction, aviation, financial services, and energy.

It has depended partly on huge foreign bank loans which he is now attempting to restructure.

"If you want to grow at 2-3% a year it’s not a problem," he said. "But if you want to grow 15-20% a year it’s a risk, it’s a ride on a wild horse."

He says he likes horses – and then laughs. He is disarmingly charming – at 41, boyish not only in his looks, but also in energy and enthusiasms.

Expanding into nuclear

As we toured the assembly line at the GAZ plant at Nizhny Novgorod – the most automated, he says, in the country – he told me he is convinced his new Russian car, the Volga Syber, will be a best-seller when the economy picks up.

Later, as we took a helicopter trip over the Sayan Mountains of southern Siberia, near his aluminium smelter, he talked of expanding into other metals – and even of building nuclear power stations.

And where does his determination come from

Mr Putin driving a 1956 Volga

He doesn’t like talking about his childhood, a time without luxuries, his father dead and his mother often absent.

But eventually he said: "I was raised in a small village.

"I know what the minimum level of life is – and anything extra looks like paradise."

He laughed. "That’s why I prefer not to count problems, but just think about what may be in the future."

Newsnight featuring the interview with Oleg Deripaska is at 2230 BST on Tuesday 14 July 2009 on BBC Two.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Scheme to let new drugs bypass NHS watchdog

• Drayson plans fast track for ‘innovative’ medicines
• Treasury fund would pay for high-cost treatments

Drug companies with “innovative” medicines would be able to bypass current safeguards and sell to the NHS at a high price under a fast-track procedure to be proposed next week by the Office for Life Sciences (OLS), run by science minister Lord Drayson.

The proposal, in a blueprint being prepared behind closed doors with input from the pharmaceutical industry, will effectively undermine the present system of approving medicines for the NHS. It will allow companies with medicines they claim are valuable and original to bypass the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice), which currently must assess every new drug to ensure it offers value for money before it can be used in the health service.

The pharmaceutical industry has been fiercely critical of Nice since its inception in 1999 because it blocks sales of expensive drugs to the NHS that are of only limited benefit. Its protests have been backed by an outcry from patient groups, often partly funded by the pharmaceutical industry, which want new drugs to treat their particular condition.

The proposal comes from OLS, run by Drayson, a former drug company boss. His remit is the promotion of the life sciences as potential big earners for Britain. Lord Mandelson, whose business department oversees the OLS, believes pharmaceuticals are key to the revival of the economy.

The blueprint will recommend that medicines thought suitable for fast-tracking should be allowed into the NHS for a period of time without Nice scrutiny.

Pharmaceutical companies are reluctant to launch new drugs in the UK at low cost because 25% of the global market is influenced by the UK price. Under the OLS proposal, Nice would appraise the drug after perhaps three years – but at that point the company may be willing to drop the price here. Critics will say the proposal threatens to undermine Nice by allowing into the NHS costly drugs that may offer no real health gain.

It comes at a time when other countries are actively considering setting up equivalents to Nice. First among them, and most important for the pharmaceutical industry, is the US. President Obama is known to be interested in some sort of cost-effectiveness scrutiny of medicines, which is bitterly opposed by the industry.

Joe Collier, emeritus professor of medicines policy at St George’s, University of London and an adviser to the select committee on health’s inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry, said there were already safeguards in Nice to propel medicines that are truly innovative and needed into the NHS rapidly, and a fast-track proposal was not needed. “It should not need to embarrass the current arrangements. If it either is designed to, or it does, then the system has got to be rethought,” he said.

“If it is an attempt to undermine the Nice process or throw the Nice process, then it is misguided and mischievous.”

While the scheme is the brainchild of Drayson’s office, the implications for the Department of Health have led to cross-departmental negotiations, which were still going on at a late stage this week.

Crucial to winning the support of health ministers and primary care trusts‚ which foot drugs bills locally‚ has been the Treasury, which agreed to fund a pot of money to pay for “innovative” drugs, so the NHS does not have to bear the cost.

Who decides which drugs are sufficiently innovative may be more difficult. It is likely that Nice itself will be invited to help select them. Those that are original and claim to offer better treatment or a longer life – but to small groups of patients – will be prime candidates. One of the arguments for this approach is the invention of “targeted” drugs such as Herceptin, which work on people with a certain genetic make-up but not others.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds