RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘News agencies’

Guardian editor calls for local news funding

Alan Rusbridger, the Guardian’s editor in chief, tonight threw his support behind a plan to give public funding to Britain’s national press agency to allow it to provide news from public authorities and courts as local newspapers withdraw because they can no longer afford it.

Rusbridger, speaking at a seminar on the future of journalism at the Media Standards Trust in London, also outlined his vision for a new digital world in which the public grows much closer to journalists.

Speaking in front of guests including film director Lord Puttnam, BBC business editor Robert Peston and Ofcom chief executive Ed Richards, Rusbridger said local news needed to be supported, or “corruption and inefficiency” would grow as scrutiny lessened.

He said the Press Association, in which most of the big British media firms including the Guardian Media Group are shareholders, should be the recipient of public money to provide local news as other providers such as newspapers and ITV regional news disappear.

In return, PA would contract out the reporting of public authorities and courts to local papers, with the content then shared with other outlets.

PA is currently looking for funding to trial the idea.

Rusbridger said the gradual disappearance of local journalism worried him.

“This bit of journalism is going to have to be done by somebody,” Rusbridger said. “It makes me worry about all of those public authorities and courts which will in future operate without any kind of systematic public scrutiny. I don’t think our legislators have begun to wake up to this imminent problem as we face the collapse of the infrastructure of local news in the press and broadcasting.”

Rusbridger said local public service journalism was a “kind of utility” which was just as important as gas and water.

“We must face up to the fact that if there is no public subsidy, then some of this [public service] reporting will come to pass in this country,” he said.

“The need is there. It is going to be needed pretty quickly.”

Rusbridger also laid out his vision of what he called “mutualised news,” which he said would “take down the walls” of traditional media companies by distributing information through new means such as social networking site Twitter and by asking the public to get involved through experiments such as “crowd sourcing”, used by the Guardian to help with its investigation into the death of Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests.

“It was a piece of conventional reporting and tapping into the resources of a crowd,” he said. “There are thousands of reporters in any crowd nowadays. There was nothing to stop people from publishing those pictures but it needed the apparatus of a mainstream news organisation for that to cut through and have impact.”

He added: “What I like about idea of mutualised news is it gets over the concept of us versus them. It is us and them. It blurs the line between journalists and reader. It is much more diverse and plural than a conventional newspaper. It gives us a huge extensive resource.”

Rusbridger denied it would be the end of conventional journalism, saying that trained journalists and the public could work together, adding it was “futile” to deny that “something interesting and exciting is going on here.”

“There are many things that mainstream media do which in collaboration with others is still really important. The ability to take a large audience and amplify things and to give more weight to what would [otherwise] be fragments. Somebody has to have the job of pulling it all together.”

Rusbridger admitted that he had originally dismissed Twitter as “silly” but now saw its huge benefits for media companies in building communities and distributing news. “When Twitter started, I confess, I didn’t get it. Sometimes you are too old to keep up with all these things and Twitter just seemed silly and I didn’t have time to add it to all of these other things, but that was completely wrong.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Leaner GM emerges from bankruptcy

GM headquarters

General Motors (GM) has emerged from bankruptcy after signing a deal allowing it to sell its best assets to a "new GM", reports say.

News agencies, quoting unnamed sources, reported that the US government and GM signed the documents at 1030 GMT, ending its 40-day bankruptcy.

Official confirmation is expected when GM holds a press conference later.

The new, leaner GM will own the company’s key assets such as Buick and will be 61% owned by the US government.

GM is in the process of selling off its other brands such as Hummer, Saab and its GM Europe arm, which owns Vauxhall and Opel.

GM filed for bankruptcy protection on 1 June, saying it would be forced to liquidate if the plan was not approved.

A new, smaller GM is being created with a reduced workforce, smaller dealer network and less debt.

It will operate the strongest parts of the old company, with only its Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC brands remaining. Its European operation, Opel, with its UK brand Vauxhall, is being sold off.

The firm is getting $60bn (£37.3bn) in financing from the US Treasury, which gives the US government a 61% share in the new GM, while the United Auto Workers union will have 17.5%.

Canada’s government will have a 12% share and GM bondholders will own about 10% in the new company.


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Pope Benedict calls for new world order

• Global recession caused by greed, says pontiff
• Economic crisis is ‘clear proof of effects of sin’

Pope Benedict today pinned responsibility for the worldwide recession squarely on greed and an amoral fascination with technological progress for its own sake.

This must be tackled, he said, by the creation of a global political authority and financial order based not just on the search for ever greater profits, but on ethics and a sense of the common good.

The pontiff made the appeal in a 144-page encyclical – a reflection on doctrine that is the highest form of papal writing – three days before he was due to discuss the global downturn with Barack Obama.

Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth) is Benedict’s third encyclical and the first to deal exclusively with economic and social issues. In one section, he says the current economic crisis is “clear proof” of the “pernicious effects of sin”.

The pope’s analysis echoed some of the criticisms made by the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, of government policies that target growth to the exclusion of wider social considerations. But, as its title suggests, the papal encyclical is a primarily theological discourse which takes as its point of departure the argument that only a belief in the truth as proclaimed by Christianity can offer the necessary answers.

“A Christianity of charity without truth would be more or less interchangeable with a pool of good sentiments,” Benedict writes. His reflection – delayed by more than a year by the world economic crisis – nevertheless contains numerous specific criticisms and recommendations. Though the pontiff does not use the word “capitalism” in the encyclical, there are lengthy reflections on morality in economics.

In a key passage, the encyclical says: “The conviction that the economy must be autonomous, that it must be shielded from ‘influences’ of a moral character, has led man to abuse the economic process in a thoroughly destructive way. In the long term, these convictions have led to economic, social and political systems that trample upon personal and social freedom, and are therefore unable to deliver the justice that they promise.”

Then in an unequivocal critique of unbridled markets, the pope writes that “grave imbalances are produced when economic action, conceived merely as an engine for wealth creation, is detached from political action, conceived as a means for pursuing justice through redistribution.”

At a press conference in the Vatican, the pope’s technical consultant, Stefano Zamagni, an economics professor at the University of Bologna, denied the encyclical was anti-capitalist, but added that it “views capitalism in its historical dimension and goes beyond it”.

He noted that “the market economy is broader than just capitalism”, which was merely one variant. In another section of the reflection, Benedict argues that “financiers must rediscover the genuinely ethical foundation of their activity … right intention, transparency, and the search for positive results are mutually compatible and must never be detached from one another.”

Then, in a passage that builds on ideas first voiced by his predecessor, John Paul II, the pope argues that globalisation has made necessary a “reform of the United Nations Organisation and likewise of economic institutions and international finance so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth”.

One of his most senior advisers, cardinal Renato Martino, said: “The encyclical is not asking for a super- or world government.” But it comes very close to doing so. It proposes a “true world political authority” that “would need to be universally recognised and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice and respect for rights.” It would be asked to “manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis [and] to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis.”

But its responsibilities would be more than just economic. They would include securing “timely disarmament, food security and peace”. The new body, a reformed UN, would also be called upon “to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration”.

Often regarded as the first “green” pope, Benedict also took advantage of his encyclical to make clearer his ideas on the importance of respecting the environment. But Zamagni said the document implicitly rejected forms of environmental thinking that put other forms of creation on a par with humankind.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds