RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Newspapers’

Met pressed to investigate hacking

• John Prescott says allegations reflect badly on police
• David Cameron resists calls to sack communications chief
• News International is not above the law, says Charles Clarke

The Metropolitan police was coming under mounting pressure today to launch a new investigation into Guardian allegations that the News of the World and other newspapers used criminal methods to get stories by hacking the phones of numerous public figures.

The former deputy prime minister John Prescott, one of the alleged targets of illegal phone-hacking, said he wanted answers from the police. “I find it staggering that there could be a list known to the police of people who had their phone tapped.

“I’m named as one of them. For such a criminal act not to be reported to me, and for action not to be taken against the people who have done it, reflects very badly on the police, and I want to know their answer.”

Prescott called on the Conservative party leader, David Cameron, to dismiss his director of communications, Andy Coulson, who was the deputy editor and then editor of the News of the World when journalists were using illegal methods. Coulson said yesterday: “This story relates to an alleged payment made after I left the News of the World two and half years ago. I took full responsibility at the time for what happened on my watch but without my knowledge and resigned.”

But Prescott said: “I think that David Cameron has to sack Andy Coulson because his denial is very narrow in the extreme. I think David Cameron himself has to be much clearer about the situation.”

This morning Cameron resisted calls to remove Coulson, telling reporters outisde his home in London: “It’s wrong for newspapers to breach people’s privacy with no justification. That is why Andy Coulson resigned as editor of the News of the World two and a half years ago.

“Of course I knew about that resignation before offering him the job. But I believe in giving people a second chance. As director of communications for the Conservatives he does an excellent job in a proper, upright way at all times.”

Earlier, the PR agent Max Clifford, who is also one those whose phones was allegedly hacked into, asked: “Why has this just come out? According to the Guardian, it’s come from police sources. If the police had this information, why didn’t they act on it?”

Speaking to the BBC, he said: “There are lots of questions that need to be answered, serious questions.”

Responding to the claims, the Metropolitan police service (MPS) pointed out that its original investigation led to the conviction of the News of the World reporter Clive Goodman in 2007. “The MPS carried out an investigation into the alleged unlawful interception of telephone calls. Officers liaised closely with the Crown Prosecution Service. Two people were charged and subsequently convicted and jailed. We are not prepared to comment further.”

The London mayor, Boris Johnson, who was one of the figures allegedly targeted and is chairman of Metropolitan Police Authority, was challenged on the issue on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme. “As chairman of the MPA it would not be right to interfere in an operational decision they [the Met] might make.” He added that he was “confident” that if the police had a duty to investigate they would.

He said there was no need for him to contact the police over the matter. “It sounds like there is a full account in the Guardian,” he said.

John Whittingdale, the chairman of the Commons culture committee, said he wanted to summon newspaper editors to answer “serious” questions about the allegations.

“There are a number of questions I would like to put to News International on the basis of what the Guardian has reported,” he said.

His committee would examine the issue “as a matter of urgency” at a scheduled meeting later today, he said. “It may well be that we decide we wish to have somebody from News International to appear before us.”

He said he had seen no “direct evidence” that assurances previously given to the committee by the publisher on the matter had been untrue.

But he added: “If that is the case it does beg the question why News International have apparently paid huge sums of money in settlement of actions in the courts. That is a question I would wish to put to News International.”

The former Cabinet minister Geoff Hoon said: “It is hard to see how in these circumstances Andy Coulson can continue as David Cameron’s communications chief while such a cloud hangs over his reputation. David Cameron must make clear what action he intends to take on this matter.”

The Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, Chris Huhne, said: “At the very least Andy Coulson was responsible for a newspaper that was out of control and at worst he was personally implicated.

“Either way, a future prime minister cannot have someone who is involved in these sort of underhand tactics. The exact parallel is with Damian McBride.

“If it is more than a thousand [phone taps] it seems most unlikely to me to have been just one journalist. There needs to be a full investigation.”

The former home secretary Charles Clarke said: “The home secretary should be asking the chief inspector of constabulary about police behavior in this whole incident. Serious questions need to be answered.”

He questioned why the police did not launch a wider investigation after the discovery that Goodman had been tapping phones for stories.

He told the Today programme: “News International needs to publish a full list of all those who it has bugged. The suggestion that News International is above the law is simply not acceptable … I think Murdoch is such a powerful figure that people don’t want to take him on gratuitously.”

He also called for Coulson to be sacked from his Conservative party role.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Andrew Neil: ‘NoW out of control’

Former Sunday Times editor says tabloid did not have a public interest defence and Andy Coulson has questions to answer

One of Rupert Murdoch’s former leading editors said last night the Guardian’s revelations of the News of the World’s phone hacking represented one of the “most significant media stories of modern times”.

Andrew Neil, who edited the Sunday Times, said the News of the World did not have a public interest defence for its practices, exposed by the Guardian.

Neil said: “I think it is one of the most significant media stories of modern times. It suggests that rather than being a one off journalist or rogue private investigator, it was systemic throughout the News of the World, and to a lesser extent the Sun.

“Particularly in the News of the World, this was a newsroom out of control … Everyone who knows the News of the World, everybody knows this was going on. But it did no good to talk about it. One News of the World journalist said to me … it was dangerous to talk about it.”

Neil was one of Murdoch’s closest aides for over a decade. He edited the Sunday Times from 1983-94, then became chairman of Sky Television from 1988-90, and was entrusted by the media tycoon to be the executive editor of Fox Television News in 1994.

Neil said he saw no public interest in the methods used against any of the politicians or celebrities targeted by the Murdoch owned newspapers: “It is illegal. That doesn’t mean it should never be done, you may have a public interest defence. But that’s not the case in any of this, it was a fishing expedition; let’s listen to who we can. It was corrupt.”

“If you imagine there was something of real major importance, you could have a public interest defence. But breaking into Gwyneth Paltrow’s voicemail after she’s just had a baby is not in the public interest. I’m at a loss to know what the public interest might be.”

He also said the police had to explain why they failed to tell top politicians that their phones had been hacked into.

Neil said the story raised serious questions for Scotland Yard, top prosecutors and for judges: “It’s not just a media story, it raises serious questions about the police.

“The police learn that the deputy prime minister has had his mobile phone compromised and they don’t tell him. I just don’t understand that.

“The police investigation unearthed evidence of clear wrongdoing and the Crown Prosecution Service does nothing.”

He added: “The court is faced with evidence of conspiracy and systemic illegal actions and agrees to seal the evidence. All that is completely wrong, I just don’t understand it.”

Speaking earlier, on the BBC’s Newsnight programme: “This is our criminal justice system in the dock.”

Neil also said News International may face legal action from those who were victims of the phone hacking, a so called class action: “News International could face a class action by people who want to mount a class action to unseal those documents. There could be the most almighty class action, you’re talking about multimillion pound losses. That gets scary.

“If this was in the US, shares in News International would collapse tonight.”
Neil said that former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, now director of communcations at the Conservative party, had questions to answer: “If a journalist comes to you with a great story, one of the first questions you ask is how did you get it. How you got it is relevant to judging its accuracy and preparing yourself for any legal challenge.

“If this behaviour was systemic in the newsroom, why would you not know about it, why would you of all people, not know about it? Either you’re incompetent or complicit.”

Asked if Murdoch himself knew of the practice, Neil, formerly one of his closest lieutenants, said: “That we will never know.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Media Talk USA: Time for a US BBC?

Is the financial crisis and the internet revolution the perfect opportunity to create a completely new media organisation? A US version of the BBC. It’s the brainchild of David Fanning, executive producer of Frontline on PBS.

The panel looks at the mini-scandal that engulfed the Washington Post over plans to charge for access to its reporters.

What does the panel make of Sarah Palin’s surprise exit from politics? The rest of the media appears baffled.

We look at transition from the Iranian elections to Michael Jackson’s death via twitter. Susan Bennett from the Newseum in Washington DC compares coverage of the singer’s death to Elvis.

Jeff jetted into the Aspen Ideas Festival and brought back and interview with the Knight Foundation’s Alberto Ibargüen on his vision for the future of journalism.

Joining Jeff in the studio this month is Alan Murray, deputy managing editor of the Wall Street Journal, and Nick Denton, the founder of Gawker Media.

WARNING: contains strong language

Leave your comments below.

Subscribe free via iTunes to ensure every episode gets delivered.

Bookmark our home page where you can find every programme.

Join our Facebook group.

Follow us on our Twitter feed.

Check out Jeff’s blog.

Thanks to City University New York for allowing us to use their excellent studio facilities just off Times Square.


Post offers Obama access for $25,000

• Meetings cost $25,000 – or $250,000 for 11 sessions
• Publisher Katharine Weymouth to host events

It used to be that the Washington Post offered the inside story for 75 cents a day. But in these financially strapped times for the press, it’s now offering to get you on the inside for $25,000.

The newspaper that brought down a president is offering to sell access to Obama administration officials, policy makers and even its own journalists at dinners hosted by the Washington Post publisher, Katharine Weymouth, at her home.

The offer has come to light in a flier aimed at healthcare companies at a time when the White House is planning major reform of the industry.

It promises “a collegial evening, with Obama administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds”. The flier, given to a healthcare lobbyist, also offers access to “healthcare reporting and editorial staff” at the off the record dinners.

“An evening with the right people can alter the debate,” the flier says. “Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders …”

“Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No. The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it”

Each meeting costs $25,000 per organisation with one thrown in free for bulk purchases of 11 dinners for $250,000.

After the flier was exposed on the Politico website, the Washington Post newsroom quickly backed away. The executive editor, Marcus Brauchli, sent an email to staff saying that reporters will not participate in the first dinner, planned for July 21.

“We will not participate in events where promises are made that in exchange for money The Post will offer access to newsroom personnel or will refrain from confrontational questioning,” he wrote. “Our independence from advertisers or sponsors is inviolable.”

But one former Post staffer said the scheme has been under consideration since last year because of the paper’s deepening financial crisis – it lost £12m in the first quarter of this year – and that some reporters were consulted about organising the meetings.

A Washington Post spokesperson, Kris Coratti, blamed the business division of the newspaper for putting out the flier without the newsroom’s approval.

“It went out before it was properly vetted, and this draft does not represent what the company’s vision for these dinners are, which is meant to be an independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers. As written, the newsroom could not participate in an event like this,” she said.

“We do believe there is an opportunity to have a conferences and events business, and that The Post should be leading these conversations in Washington, big or small, while maintaining journalistic integrity. The newsroom will participate where appropriate.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Fake Miliband duo call it quits on Twitter

A pair of recent university graduates were behind the fake Twitter account of foreign secretary David Miliband and say it highlights the importance of verification on the internet

The world now has one less Twitter account satirising a politician. After duping the international press, two recent university graduates have decided to stop updating the fake account of British foreign secretary David Miliband.

Several newspapers, including The Guardian, incorrectly reported that David Miliband posted a heartfelt tribute to Michael Jackson on his Twitter account following the pop star’s death. The tribute was not posted by Miliband but rather by 23-year-old Rory Crew and 22-year-old Knud Noelle.

They created the account in January to bring political comedy to Twitter, Crew said. They wanted to pick someone well known but realised thought Gordon Brown was too obvious. “No one would have believed it,” he said.

They respect Miliband but they also believed that “he would be the perfect politician to parody,” Crew said.

They settled on him because while Miliband is frequently quoted in the press there is little if any reporting on his personal life or thoughts. No one would have the information to contradict their satirical snippets on Twitter.

They checked the FCO website regularly so that they could keep up with his schedule, and if they were lacking in inspriration, they checked his occasional blog posts for ideas.

While some of the tweets were clearly ridiculous and his constituency paper, the Shields Gazette, described them as “increasingly bizarre”, some FCO staff thought it might be an inside job because of the accuracy of the diary items.

After tricking media from “China to Washington”, they have decided to stop posting to the account because they didn’t want to bring themselves or Miliband into disrepute and “there was no where to go with this short of causing an actual diplomatic incident,” Crew said.

Their goal wasn’t to trick the media. “I’m not happy about duping the media, but they learned something,” he said. All journalists had to do to realise the account was fake was to read one or two of previous updates, such as this tweet: “The proleteriat make my head hurt!.” It’s also doubtful that David Miliband would ever refer to Chancellor Secretary Alistair Darling as “Eyebrows”.

“It does highlight the importance of the verification of sources, which is clearly becoming more difficult in the web 2.0 era,” the pair wrote in an email to the Guardian.

Noelle has just finished his journalism degree from City University, and Crew plans to start a journalism course. But the experience left Crew “a little bit disappointed” with journalism but said it was the result of newspapers cutting sub editors and lacking in fact checking.

They hope to make a living from writing, and one positive result from the hoax is that they now have the confidence to do it.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


How Newspapers Abdicated the Front Page’s Influence and How They Can Get it Back By Linking

The front page of the newspaper used to set the news agenda. Extra, Extra, read all about it! But that influence has steadily waned through the TV and Cable News era, and the web now threatens to obliterate it entirely.
So who sets the news agenda now? One significant influence is a guy with nothing but [...]

What The Newspaper Industry Could Learn About Do Or Die Innovation From General Motors

As newspaper companies lose billions in market capitalization and innovation-minded journalists battle newsroom “curmudgeons” shell-shocked by the rapid pace of change amid increasingly dire economic realities, a lesson in burn-the-rule-book transformation might come from an unexpected source: General Motors. That’s right, the once-dominate car maker, which missed every trend that has lead to Toyota’s dominance, [...]