RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Norwich’

Where there’s smoke

A woman kissing a dog, a deserted car plant, a blow-out in a basement – this show is not quite what it seems

I am about to enter Laure Prouvost’s film installation, at East International in Norwich, when a powerful spotlight blasts me full in the face. I blunder, blinded, into the dark. There is a sudden, recorded crash. The light and noise have been triggered by my presence. I can’t see a thing and almost sit on someone’s head by mistake. Sorry, sorry, sorry. The film begins, with a warning that questions will be asked at the end. An American is talking, too fast, and his words are mis-transcribed in the subtitles, which flash by even faster. The guy is talking about Walter Benjamin and the language of cinema, but I am reading about someone’s husband who likes hard rock, or is that hard cock – and did he just say something about enemas? A sign flashes up: CAN YOU BE QUIET PLEASE. Everyone else seems to have left, so that must mean me. The film is over before I’ve found my notebook. Outside, the light blasts on again and the next hapless visitor stumbles into the blackness, to the same crash.

Prouvost is one of the two prize winners of this show, a biennial exhibition that forms part of the city-wide Contemporary Art Norwich. The other is British artist Stuart Whipps, whose photographs of the closed down Longbridge car plant in Birmingham show abandoned canteens with sad, drooping bunting, assembly lines with rusting car bodies and endless gantries, the whole mothballed plant left to decay. Whipps’s photographs are supplemented by archival material and analysis of Margaret Thatcher’s speeches, early indicators of the grim state of current British industry.

East has been running since 1991, and has had financial crises of its own. But under the directorship of Lynda Morris, this biennial has always attempted to make Norwich aware of its historical, political and artistic links to Europe and beyond. It is always interesting. Chosen from an open submission, this year’s exhibition has been selected by the veteran British conceptual artists Art&Language, and by Raster Gallery, from Warsaw.

In a shadowy room, an elliptical conversation takes place between the surrealist Meret Oppenheim, the photographer and Picasso muse Dora Maar, and the singer Josephine Baker. Picasso’s Weeping Woman – a portrait of Maar – hangs on the wall; other bits of modernist and surrealist art litter the room. Oppenheim’s fur-lined teacup must be there somewhere. The conversation is stilted and unbelievably pretentious, even by pre-war Paris standards. “Do we only perceive what is past?” one character asks. “You can trace everything back to memories,” says another, in clipped 1930s English. Sometimes they break into French, or swap one another’s lines. This film, Lunch in Fur by Ursula Mayer, is peculiar and arresting; watching it, I am uncertain if this is old footage or new, if the lines are quotes from a movie or a novel, if the whole thing is a joke or utterly serious. These sorts of doubts continue throughout the exhibition.

By the time I watch British artist David Jacques’s very instructive film about the north-west of England, anarcho-syndicalism and time travel, things have slipped a few gears. I’m even less sure of what I’m being told. Jacques’s film is a spoof documentary that describes numerous encounters across time and space, all occurring in Manchester, Liverpool and north Wales between 1910 and 1918, at a series of annual conferences begun in honour of the Catalan educationalist and anarchist Francisco Ferrer y Guàrdia. Ferrer was real; the rest is a fiction.

There is very little sculpture or painting here. A sooty, solid cloud of resin marks the spot of a spontaneous combustion in one of the basements of the art school, where Polish artist Olaf Brzeski also shows a grainy, black-and-white film of soldiers in the snow. The men are visited by a spooky bogeyman carrying a dead rabbit. The film looks old, again as if this were archive footage. Something terrible stirs in the woods, but we don’t know what.

In Andrew Cranston’s painted jokes about lonely painters going mad or suicidal in their grim, freezing studios, there are lots of knowing art gags about Courbet and the socially excluded painter, whose only company is a bucket of paint-hardened brushes and a giant, mouldering canvas. It reminds me why I gave up painting.

Polish artist Agnieszka Kurant’s work in Norwich is almost invisible. Her piece, Future Anterior, is just a couple of bleached newspaper pages presented under glass on an outside wall. Passers-by might easily miss the bad news: the Amazon rainforest has shrunk to almost nothing, Central America braces itself for an attack of ravaging moths, Los Angeles has been hit by an earthquake. On a positive note, scientists announce that the dark matter anti-gravity question has now been nailed. I stand outside in the Norwich drizzle, gasping.

These are headlines on the New York Times, dated 29 September 2020. Even the words are on the verge of disappearance. But there is more to Future Anterior than make-believe journalism: to make the work, Kurant asked a clairvoyant to provide forecasts of the future, an alarming number of which have come true. She then approached a number of New York Times journalists to write the stories up, and had the pages printed using a heat-sensitive ink that only appears at a certain range of temperatures. “The print is as fragile as information distorted by rumour,” she has explained, as if art and the world weren’t already complicated enough.

In the end, all of these scenarios are entirely plausible, and all the best art here is grounded in reality. Grace Schwindt’s films are largely based on her family’s recollections of Berlin during the second world war. The accounts are touching, miserable and horrifying.

There is an undeniable seriousness and sensitivity to Schwindt’s work. Licking Dogs, meanwhile, is a film of the British artist Angela Bartram snogging four dogs. “No dog was harmed in the making of Licking Dogs,” Bartram’s website informs us, “and none were forced to take part.” The German shepherd is very keen, and the St Bernard slobbers away dutifully in some very wet face-on-face contact. Another mutt just won’t play; the dog looks at Bartram and Bartram looks at the dog. This is the best moment in the whole farrago. None of this ever looked like it was going to go anywhere, except into the realms of the over-intellectual. There is a difference between the real and the really annoying.

East International is at the Norwich University College of the Arts until 22 August.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


UK’s Labour party faces setback in by-election

Prime Minister Gordon Brown faces a test of his leadership this week when a looming by-election defeat in the eastern English city of Norwich could reignite a plot to oust him.  A poor result for his ruling Labour party threatens to embolden party dissidents who last month conspired to  unseatPrime Minister Gordon Brown faces a test of his leadership this week when a looming by-election defeat in the eastern English city of Norwich could reignite a plot to oust him. A poor result for his ruling Labour party threatens to embolden party dissidents who last month conspired to unseat

Norwich ponders a Green future in byelection

On the doorsteps of Norwich, voters are sick to death of government sleaze. So every prospective MP tiptoeing towards them, from the Conservatives to the Greens, claims to represent a clean break from corrupt Westminster.

But in the Norwich North byelection next week, the first test for nervous political parties after the expenses scandal, the only person who seems certain to win if they stood is their Labour MP, Ian Gibson, who resigned after his party deselected him over his expenses.

“Dr Ian Gibson was just about the best MP in the country,” said one voter. “He had time for everybody.”

“If Ian Gibson went independent, I’d vote for him,” said David Lewis. “The Labour party has dropped a big one here.” Peggy Lewis added: “It’s scandalous how he’s been treated.”

Gibson, a respected backbencher, was bitterly disappointed when Labour’s expenses disciplinary committee barred him from standing at the next election for selling the London flat he part-funded from his second home allowance to his daughter at below-market rates.

But Gibson will not stand as an independent against his party. Instead, the race for Norwich North is the clearest demonstration yet of a new era multi-party politics. The Conservatives are favourites to recapture a seat they lost in 1997 but the election is a four-way fight and could be a political watershed for the Green party, which has built up a uniquely strong base in Norwich.

The Greens have 13 city councillors and won seven Norwich seats – from Labour and the Liberal Democrats – in the June county council elections. They took a 25% share of the Norwich vote in the European election and, with so many parties standing, including the maverick Norfolk-born independent Craig Murray, 25% could be enough to win Norwich North.

“We’ve never had a strong local base or councillors when fighting a byelection before,” said the Green candidate, Rupert Read, a city councillor and philosophy lecturer. “Now the public and the media have got reasons to take us seriously, who knows what will happen?”

The Greens will not say they can win, and more than half of the electorate in Norwich North live in strongly Conservative suburbs beyond the city boundaries, but Caroline Lucas, the MEP and leader of the Greens, said: “There is a very strong sense of disillusionment with all of the three main parties and that is something that can play well for us. People want to vote for something that is more positive and progressive, a vote for the future rather than a vote for the grey parties of the past.”

In Norwich’s Victorian streets, most voters back the Greens – to their faces, anyway. “We’ve had enough of all the other ones so maybe we’ll give you a try,” Joanne Shrimpling told Read.

Martin Smith has voted Labour in the past and felt the party stuck “a few knives in the back” of Gibson. So he will vote Green this time. “It is important to have some pressure groups in Westminster,” he said.

Gibson refused to endorse the Greens but said: “I’m still a member of the Labour party but very uneasy about the way I’ve been treated. The Green party are developing, they know they’ve got a lot of support and the other parties better take notice because they work hard, they are young and they are keen. I’ve no doubt that Norwich could fall to them in the future.”

The Greens may be helped by the well-funded Ukip, who will take votes from the Tories and are already putting billboards up across the city promising a “clean start”. But the Greens may end up doing the Conservatives a bigger favour, according to Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Norfolk. “The risk is that they let the Tories in by dividing non-Tory voters,” said Lamb. He argued that the Lib Dem candidate, April Pond, was a free-thinking politician in the mould of Gibson. “The fascinating thing is Labour have chosen a guy from London and the Conservatives have someone who is quite Westminster-centric and we’ve got a local businesswoman who is Norfolk to the core. Given the seat is used to an independent-minded MP, she is a natural successor to Ian.”

Labour hopes that by choosing Chris Ostrowski – a 28-year-old John Lewis employee with ties to Norwich from his university days – it can shrug off the controversy over the treatment of Gibson, who had a 5,459 majority, and hold the seat. Charles Clarke, the Labour MP for Norwich South, said: “There is anger at the way Ian Gibson has been treated by Labour but the party is very determined to do its very best to win the byelection and it has got a very strong candidate to do so.”

Three centre-left parties competing for votes and little enthusiasm for the BNP has left the Tory byelection frontrunner, Chloe Smith, 27, a Norfolk-born business consultant who has been campaigning in the constituency for 18 months, needing a 5.9% swing.

“I’ve been talking to as many residents as I can about what matters in Norwich,” she said. “We need a strong local MP who can be a champion for the things that are important for Norwich but it’s also an opportunity to send a message to Gordon Brown by voting Conservative and looking for a strong but fresh face to be their MP.”

She has benefited from two visits from David Cameron already, although the Tory leader blotted his copybook with his German accent during one trip.

Even Smith paid tribute to the “strength” of Gibson – disgraced in Labour’s eyes but currently the most popular man in Norwich.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds