RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘nuclear trade’

Delhi focus

By Kim Ghattas
BBC News, Mumbai

She skipped India on her first trip to Asia in March, but now Hillary Clinton is spending almost four days here, talking to business leaders and women activists in Mumbai and meeting Indian politicians in Delhi.

Hillary Clinton

Before leaving Washington, Mrs Clinton emphasised that the US administration was going to do everything to broaden and deepen Washington’s engagement with India.

It is a message that India is keen to hear – during the first months of the Obama administration, as Washington focused intensely on Pakistan, Afghanistan and the fight against al-Qaeda, India worried that the US would view its policy towards the whole region through that prism.

But the focus of Mrs Clinton’s visit, at least publicly, is very clearly on US-Indian ties.

Two-fold aim

American officials often make a stop in Pakistan when they visit India, but Mrs Clinton will only go to Islamabad in the autumn.

Washington is keen to dispel any doubts about its commitment to ties with Delhi that its early focus on Pakistan and Afghanistan may have given rise to.

For Washington, there is a lot riding on the visit. And in an opinion piece published in the Times of India, Mrs Clinton points out that "the world has a lot riding on our cooperation" as well.

For Mrs Clinton, the aim is two-fold.

First, she wants to convince India that the Obama administration is as keen on close ties with India as George W Bush was. The Bush administration’s 2008 nuclear agreement with India ended a three decade-long ban on nuclear trade with Delhi, so Mrs Clinton will be eager to maintain the momentum.

"Certainly, you will not hear from me or President Obama or our Administration any desire to prevent the continuing development of India – but we also understand the grave threat posed by climate change to coastal countries like India"

Hillary Clinton

But Mrs Clinton is also seeking a variety of tangible results while she is here.

She is hoping to sign an end-of-use monitoring agreement, which would ensure that any arms technology sold to India does not end up in third countries. This is a legal pre-requisite for any US arms sales to India.

Washington is also hoping that India will announce it has reserved two sites for US companies to build nuclear power plants, thus allowing the US to benefit from any lucrative nuclear business deals, deals that were made possible after Washington helped India end its nuclear isolation with last year’s agreement.

Travelling with Mrs Clinton is also the Obama administration’s climate envoy Todd Stern.

The US House of Representatives last month passed a bill which imposes trade restrictions on countries which do not sign up to a carbon emissions cap.

The bill now moves to the Senate, but it is a source of concern for developing countries like India and China, which have refused to commit to emissions cuts unless developed nations present sufficient targets themselves.

Terror commemoration

In an interview with CNN-IBN, Mrs Clinton said that she was looking at "how together we can make the fight against climate change a win-win proposition".

"Certainly, you will not hear from me or President Obama or our administration any desire to prevent the continuing development of India. But we also understand the grave threat posed by climate change to coastal countries like India that will be on the front lines of the devastation likely to be reaped if we do not rein in the increasing temperature that is being recorded."

Before the political discussions in Delhi, Mrs Clinton is spending two days in Mumbai where she will hold meetings with business leaders, women activists and promoters of education initiatives.

The secretary of state is very keen on "people-to-people" diplomacy and usually holds town hall events and meetings with civil society leaders on foreign visits.

Smoke and flames billow out from the Taj Hotel, Mumbai, India, after a terrorist attack, 29 November 2008

Her schedule on this trip is lighter than usual, however, as she tries to fit in several sessions a day of physiotherapy to recover from a broken elbow.

But Mrs Clinton will also be attending a small commemoration ceremony for the Mumbai terror attacks which left more than 170 people dead in November 2008.

Mrs Clinton is staying at the famous, century-old Taj Mahal Palace, the luxurious hotel which was targeted in the attacks and is still being refurbished.

The Indian Express newspaper said that the choice of hotel was a "gesture of solidarity with India against terrorism".

Pakistan admitted the attacks were planned on its soil. And so while India’s ties with Pakistan are not officially on the agenda, the issue cannot be avoided.

The two neighbours have just held rare talks, after the Mumbai attacks sent their ties into the deep freeze.

For Washington, there is a lot riding on that as well – the US is embroiled in a battle against al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, which uses Pakistan as a support base.

Mrs Clinton is likely to push in private for a smoothing of Pakistani-Indian ties and, in her India Times opinion piece, she urged Delhi to join Washington in supporting Pakistan’s fight against radical militants. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Tough task

By Sanjoy Majumder
BBC News, Delhi

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has arrived on a four-day visit to India, a country she knows well and where she is immensely popular.

But her visit comes at a sensitive time in relations between Washington and Delhi, a time when key geopolitical issues hang in the balance.

Mrs Clinton first visited India in 1995 as US first lady, a trip that helped break the ice between two countries on opposite sides of the Cold War fence.

It also paved the way for her husband’s immensely successful visit five years later.

She now returns as a representative of US President Barack Obama and will find that Indians are a bit apprehensive of her new leader.

While former President George W Bush is credited with transforming relations with India – the cornerstone of which was a landmark civilian nuclear agreement – Mr Obama’s regional focus has been entirely on Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Cashing in

But Washington knows it cannot afford to ignore India.

"The world has a lot riding on our co-operation"

Hillary Clinton

In a front-page article in the Times of India newspaper on Friday, Mrs Clinton wrote that close co-operation between India and the United States was vital to tackle global security threats, nuclear proliferation and climate change.

"I hope a new era of stronger co-operation between India and the United States will be one of the signature accomplishments of our new governments," she wrote. "The world has a lot riding on our co-operation."

Key to that close relationship is the economy.

The US is India’s largest trading partner, with investments of close to $10bn (£6bn). But India too is investing heavily in the US economy, its stake valued at some $3.7bn (£2.3bn) last year.

With the civilian nuclear trade agreement in place, the US is hoping to cash in.

During her visit, Mrs Clinton is expected to announce the location of two nuclear power plants that US companies will build.

A recent report by the Confederation of Indian Industry says that India intends to import 24 nuclear reactors in the next 10-15 years, creating "as many as 20,000 new jobs directly and indirectly in the US from nuclear trade".

Delhi is also in the market for some 125 new fighter aircraft to replace ageing Soviet-era planes, and the US is locked in competition with France, Britain and Russia to win the multi-million dollar deal.

Sharp differences

But the Obama administration also needs Delhi’s co-operation on three key global issues which are among its key policy objectives – nuclear non-proliferation, climate change, and a new world trade treaty.

US security officials outside the Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai, July 17

India has sharp differences with Washington on all three areas.

Along with China, it has been a key dissenter on trade and climate change talks, refusing, for instance, to agree to emission caps.

India has also refused to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, describing it as discriminatory since it does not press existing nuclear powers to give up their weapons.

Without India on board, the Obama administration knows they will make little headway on any of these issues.

And while President Obama’s new Afghanistan-Pakistan policy forms the cornerstone of his regional approach, Washington is only too aware that without India’s co-operation, any resolution of the situation in those two countries could come apart.

So if the US wants Pakistan to concentrate its efforts on the fight against al-Qaeda and the Taliban along the Afghan border, it needs to ensure that there is peace between India and Pakistan so that troops from the east can be relocated to the battle in the north-west.

Regional wrangling

For the first time, a major US figure is visiting India without also travelling to Pakistan.

Many in India strongly believe that it was gentle pressure from Washington that persuaded Delhi to restart peace talks with Islamabad, on hold since last year’s Mumbai attacks.

And Pakistan has recently indicated that it may be willing to broker peace between the US and the Taliban, but in exchange wants India to reduce its engagement in Afghanistan.

After the fall of the Taliban in 2001, India quickly re-established diplomatic ties and now operates four missions in Afghanistan, two of them located in Kandahar and Jalalabad, uncomfortably close to the Pakistan border.

Islamabad accuses Delhi of using these missions to foment trouble in Baluchistan and the North West Frontier Province, a charge that India denies.

But there is some suggestion that the US is trying to press India to at least scale down its diplomatic presence, if not close down some of its posts.

Despite her popularity, Mrs Clinton will have her diplomatic skills tested to the fullest in India.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.