RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Olympic’

2016 Olympics Announcement

Will Chicago come out on top in the 2016 Olympics decision?
The 2016 Olympics announcement is coming shortly before 1:00 EST on Friday, October 2nd, and PopCrunch will be here to tell you if Chicago manages to land the 2016 Summer games.
The final pool of cities includes Chicago, Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Tokyo. The [...]

Olympic losers

Which Olympic candidate cities have failed most often?

KINGS, presidents and television stars are among the grandees gathering in Copenhagen on Friday October 2nd to influence the International Olympic Committee’s choice of host city for the 2016 summer Olympic games. Barack Obama is set to address the committee in favour of Chicago, perhaps nudging his adopted city ahead of Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Tokyo. Chicago has had plenty of practice: this is its fourth try as a candidate. Tokyo and Madrid have each had one fewer bid, while Tokyo has hosted the games. Rio is only the second South American city to be a candidate, after Buenos Aires had three unsuccessful attempts. Only Detroit has a worse record at Olympic bids than the Windy City, enduring six failures in six attempts.

Going for gold: Who will land Olympic glory?

Tonight, at a conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, the International Olympic Committee will announce which city has been successful in their bid to host the 2016 Games.   Here, Emirates Business puts questions to the people behind the four citiesTonight, at a conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, the International Olympic Committee will announce which city has been successful in their bid to host the 2016 Games. Here, Emirates Business puts questions to the people behind the four cities’ applications – Carlos Nuzman (chief of bid for Rio

The Olympic games: Ring quartet

The first race in the Olympics is to decide which city hosts them

OLYMPIC sport demands many years of preparation, and not just for the athletes. On October 2nd in Copenhagen the International Olympic Committee will decide whether Chicago, Madrid, Rio de Janeiro or Tokyo will stage the summer games in 2016. The competition to play host is as keen as anything on the track. All four cities have produced fat “bid books” explaining why they will be the best showcase and listing the projected costs of stadiums, roads and accommodation.

Would-be hosts have to promise more than a great (and profitable) party. The games are expected to have a “legacy” too: for instance, encouraging children to play sport or redeveloping parts of the city, as London, host in 2012, intends. Parsimony is a virtue too. Chicago will stage some events in its convention centre. Tokyo plans to refurbish some facilities used in the 1964 games. Much of the infrastructure for Madrid’s bid already exists or would be built anyway. The proposed Olympic stadium, for example, will be home to the Atletico Madrid football team by 2012. Rio must be ready in any event for the football World Cup in Brazil in 2014. …

Olympic aim to get Britons online

Marathon race

The race is on to get as many people online as possible by 2012, Martha Lane Fox has told the BBC.

The newly-appointed Digital Champion has been charged by government with finding a way of getting the six million poorest Britons online.

Speaking to the BBC’s Business Editor Robert Peston, Ms Lane Fox said she wanted a virtual race to sit alongside the 2012 Olympics.

"Let’s have a race online alongside all the other big races that are going on."

"What I’d like to try and start with is a kind of challenge to the country to hook around the Olympics because that’s something that’s in our national psyche," she said.

"I quite like the idea of a sort of virtual race alongside all the real races. So, I want to kind of get this idea out there of how we try and create a completely wired and online community of people by the time Britain has the Olympics hosted here," she added.

Plugged in

Martha Lane Fox

Some 17 million Britons are currently not online, either out of choice or because they cannot afford internet connectivity.

Ms Lane Fox has indicated that she wants to concentrate on the six million poorest "nonliners" first.

She will be relying on people already online to convince others to join them.

"The only way I think we can do that is if all of us as individuals sit down and think okay, how can I bring someone on this journey with me"

"So I’d like to kind of raise the challenge to the country about how we could create a team of volunteers that will build a big peer-to-peer network, training and mentoring.

"Get kids training grannies, get all of us kind of plugging into our local communities to try and pull the whole country along.

"If we all took it on ourselves to train ten, twenty people, the job is done," she said.

Basic right

She will be drawing on projects already up and running around the UK.

The thing that I found interesting in the month that I’ve been doing it is that there is a huge number of different things happening, masses of different local projects run by charities, run by government organisations, run by private companies," she said.

"I think what my role should be pulling them together, raising the profile of the ones that are good, thinking about how we can replicate them," she added.

Ms Lane Fox said she was firmly of the belief that the internet was a "basic human right alongside electricity and water".

"I certainly believe that from here on in you are not going to be able to be a good citizen of this country if you don’t have technical skills," she said.

It is widely acknowledged that being online can save people money with the average estimate being savings of around £276 per year.

Ms Lane Fox has some more statistics.

"If you have internet skills, you will earn up to 10% more than if you don’t. If you have internet skills, you will be 25% more confident than if you don’t. And if you have internet skills, people’s feelings of loneliness when they’ve come from vulnerable situations have gone down by 80%," she told the BBC.

While most would agree with her enthusiasm to persuade the social excluded to get online not everyone is convinced by her strategy.

"Before we recruit a team of enthusiasts to travel the country looking for people who don’t use the internet we need to find out why these people are not already online," said Alex Salter, co-founder of broadband measurement firm SamKnows.


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

WADA’s ”whereabout” clause is not infringement on players” privacy: Gill

Union Minister for Youth Affairs and Sports MS Gill on Monday came out in support of the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) after the Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) backs its players” refusal to sign up the directive.
“WADA’s ‘whereabout’ clause is not an infringement on players” privacy. All sportspersons should cooperate with them,” [...]

Patrick Ryan: Leaving a Lasting Legacy

The privately-funded efforts of World Sport Chicago will continue no matter the 2016 Games selection. But if Chicago is chosen, the profile and programs of WSC -along with its funding–are expected to grow.

Games tsar will ensure 2012 legacy

The government is to counter criticism that it is failing to deliver on the promises that helped win the 2012 Olympic Games for London by appointing a “sports legacy tsar”, to get more people participating in sport and help attract private sector investment.

Ministers are looking for a high-profile figure who could be a former Olympic athlete or an influential name who has experience of running a sporting body.

With the Olympic flame due to be lit in the new stadium in Stratford, east London, three years from tomorrow, there is increasing optimism that organisers will deliver the games on time and within the £9.3bn budget, despite the impact of the recession. But opposition MPs and senior sports figures have told the Guardian that there remain serious questions over the legacy of the 2012 Games. In particular, there are concerns over promises to use the Olympics to increase sporting activity and fight obesity.

Critics claim that “four years have been wasted” in devising a strategy to deliver on the promise of getting 1 million people taking part in more sport by 2012 and a broader pledge to get 1 million more participating in physical activity, including walking and gardening.

Organisations including the British Olympic Association and the CCPR (Central Council of Physical Recreation), which represents hundreds of governing bodies, have voiced concerns that plans to use the Olympics to make a “once in a lifetime” change in the population’s sporting habits are yet to have any impact at grassroots level. The shadow sports minister, Hugh Robertson, said: “The lack of a proper strategy for delivering our participation promises is the single biggest problem with the Olympics.”

The Liberal Democrat Olympic spokesman, Tom Brake, said “alarm bells must be ringing in government”, which “may have bitten off more than it can chew”. The CCPR chair, Brigid Simmonds, added: “We have been saying for some time that the Olympics will have a long sunrise and a very short sunset. If we don’t get it right, this huge opportunity will be lost. With three years to go, let’s grasp it and let’s get on with it.” In response, it is understood that the sports minister, Gerry Sutcliffe, who remains confident that the targets can be achieved, plans to convene a new team led by a “legacy tsar” to co-ordinate sport participation.

The government believes that it has put all the necessary building blocks in place, including getting the various agencies working harmoniously and doubling sports funding in the three years since 2005, but acknowledges that a more co-ordinated national approach is required.

“Some regions are getting on and doing it and others are sitting back and waiting for something to happen,” Sutcliffe said. “It’s got to be about inspiration as well. The athletes need to be out in their communities inspiring people.”

It will also co-ordinate a drive to get private backers involved in the legacy push. Adidas will announce that it is rolling out its “sportszone” concept around the country following a trial in London, and there are hopes that other Olympic sponsors will want to get involved with legacy projects. Figures released last week by Sport England, the body charged with delivering the 1 million participation increase and investing £480m of lottery and public funds in grassroots sport between 2009 and 2013, revealed that progress appeared to have stalled.

Quarterly figures showed that of 31 sports measured according to how many people played them at least once a week, only table tennis recorded an increase. Nine – including swimming, football, gymnastics and rowing – showed a decline and the rest showed no change.

In order to achieve its target, Sport England must boost the 6.8 million people playing sport for 30 minutes at least three times a week by 1 million. The other 1 million, to be delivered through other government agencies including the National Health Service, must be doing some form of physical activity for 30 minutes at least three times a week. Sport England argues that the quarterly survey is merely a guide and that the next annual survey, due in December, will give a clearer idea of progress under a plan launched earlier this year to invest the bulk of its lottery and public funds directly through sport governing bodies.

It was partly the bold legacy promises made by London Organising Committee chairman, Seb Coe, that the Olympics would transform the East End of London, inspire a generation of young people through sport and deliver health benefits for the entire nation that helped convince International Olympic Committee members to vote for the city in 2005.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


What happened next

How do you follow the greatest day of your life? One year on, Emma John catches up with six Olympic gold medallists and finds that if you think losing’s hard, you should try winning

Twelve months ago, we were a nation transfixed. We knew that the Beijing Olympics would be the greatest show on earth: we had never guessed that Britain would play such a starring role. From the moment that Nicole Cooke crossed the line in the women’s road race, to James DeGale’s middleweight scrap on the penultimate day of the Games, we got up early, joined Hazel Irvine on the couch, and watched, open-mouthed, as a procession of British talent took the podium. When Boris Johnson accepted the handover flag, Britain had finished the 29th Olympiad fourth in the medal tally with 19 gold medals, and 47 medals in total – our best performance in exactly 100 years.

A year on, a few have stayed with us – the one who was knighted, the one who wore Jimmy Choos, and the one we mistook for a villain, at least until she won the 400m. For the rest, if we’re honest, we would struggle to match the name to the sport, if we remembered the names at all. If we do think of our Olympic champions, we might imagine them basking in their achievements, their perfect physiques wrapped in a contented glow. We tend to forget that for those who have spent their lives chasing a single, all-but-impossible, goal, achieving it leaves a void. As Victoria Pendleton, the track cyclist who took the women’s sprint title, puts it: “You don’t plan for the next day.”

Most have chosen to attempt it all over again. The opportunity to perform at a home Games comes only to a lucky few, and of the 27 British gold medallists, only two have opted not to defend their titles at London 2012, with another two undecided. The rest have already returned to their gyms, to their diets, to their sleep schedules; to the start of the long, monotonous climb towards a peak performance three years away.

For gold medallists, anticlimax isn’t just a danger, it’s an unavoidable reality. The American sprinter Wilma Rudolph, after finishing the 1960 Olympics with victories in the 100m, 200m and 100m relay, said: “There has to be more to this life than that.” After the 2004 Games, where he won the individual pursuit, cyclist Bradley Wiggins found himself locked in a year-long spiral of drink and depression, a combination of unlimited partying opportunities with a sudden loss of purpose. Another Athens champion, the Australian diver Chantelle Newbery, was admitted to hospital with depression. Harold Abrahams seemed grief-stricken after his 100m gold in 1924 – when a friend asked him why, he replied: “Maybe you should try winning some time.”

For athletes who have known no other life but full-time training, it can be hard to picture a future beyond the locker room. Many will have forgone university or other higher education. Only a lucky few will find roles in coaching or commentating; the others must start new careers from scratch. Cyclist Paul Manning, who won gold in the team pursuit, was the first champion to announce their retirement after Beijing. He has since landed a job as assistant construction manager with the firm that is building the London 2012 velodrome, but he admitted that, even with a degree in geology, it was intimidating to enter a tough job market with a CV that boasted shelf-stacking and a paper round.

So what do you do after the Downing Street drinks have run out, and the open-top bus has dropped you back home?

Backstage at Belfast’s Odyssey Arena, in a small, spare dressing room, James DeGale is punching the air. Not in euphoria, although he is euphoric. The boxer has just beaten the Czech fighter Jindrich Kubin in two minutes 22 seconds, and he is replaying some of the highlights for his trainer, Jim McDonnell, and his dad, Leroy.

“In the corner, I had him with a body blow, then boom! Boom!” He dances around the space. “He didn’t hurt me one bit. I feel fantastic. I could go again tomorrow, Jim, easy.” The 48-year-old McDonnell, a former European champion, tells him to enjoy the feeling. “The number of times you’ll come into a dressing room, you’ve done 12 rounds, and you can’t even breathe…”

This is DeGale’s second professional fight, and his second win. The 23-year-old turned pro in December, four months after reaching the peak of his amateur career with his middleweight gold in Beijing. The thought of becoming the first Olympic boxing champion to retain his title in his home city was tempting for a time – he was, he says, still in “the Olympic bubble”. But he has wanted to be a professional fighter since, aged 13, he first saw a video of Naseem Hamed. When Frank Warren, the man who made Naz, offered him terms worth “not far off” £2m, the bubble burst.

It did, however, mean an end to the non-stop party life DeGale had enjoyed since Beijing (as his father Leroy says, endearingly, “It’s not fair to depict him as a playboy; he was only a playboy for four months”). Having well and truly celebrated his arrival at the top of his sport, he began again as a novice. There was a new training regime – longer runs, tougher sparring rounds – and DeGale learned the hard way that an Olympic gold buys you little goodwill in the professional realm. His debut in February – a points victory against Georgian Vepkhia Tchilaia – was marred by boos from sections of the crowd, and poor reviews in the press; and it upset the one-time golden boy to find himself, so suddenly, an antihero.

“I sparred with someone a week ago,” says DeGale, “and today they’ve wrote on the internet: ‘I can’t believe all these Olympians are getting so much attention – James DeGale is nothing special.’” He adds that he has found respect from most fighters, including his idol Joe Calzaghe. The former world champion had previously speculated that DeGale’s post-Beijing fortune would diminish his hunger for success. But DeGale has set his goals high, a British title by the end of 2010 and a world title by 2012, and today, with the adrenaline of his TKO, he seems ecstatic about his progress. “I can fight, I can box, I can move my feet when I need to. If you compare from my first fight to now, it’s pathetic, innit?”

Boxing is one of the few Olympic sports that offers its champions a path to a greater prize. For the rest, be they athletes or archers, the question is: what next? There is no way to better a gold medal: the only challenge left is to win more. And that means repeating themselves, submitting to the same sacrifices, the same routines, and the same cycle of “lesser” tournaments – competitions that were once major events in their careers. There’s also the knowledge that, when the Games arrive, nothing less than victory will do. “If I’d gone to London 2012 and won a bronze or a silver,” says DeGale, “it would have been a failure.”

Rower Andrew Triggs Hodge, the blond-maned stroke in the victorious men’s four, admits that before Beijing he had a very particular motivation. “I was always labelled the dumb kid at school,” says Triggs Hodge. “I didn’t achieve anything. When I discovered rowing, something I was good at, it was like a ‘fuck you’ to everybody who didn’t believe in me.”

In 2004, his boat came dead last in the men’s eight: more than 1,000 days of training, including 4am starts and ergos that took him to the edge of unconsciousness, had counted for nothing. Victory in Beijing was the settling of an imagined score. “Then there was nothing left,” he admits. “I wondered, ‘Has the carrot gone?’”

Of his team-mates, Steve Williams has taken an indefinite break from rowing to ask himself the same question and Tom James only recently announced his return. Triggs Hodge lasted just six weeks away from the water before he cracked. “I tried to distract myself, but it was intrinsic, I just wanted to do it. I didn’t want to prove anybody wrong – I’ve put those ghosts to bed. The only way I can describe it, now, is pure will.” It seems to be working: competing in the pairs with Peter Reed, the other member of the Beijing four, Triggs Hodge has taken gold and two silvers in this summer’s world cup regattas.

Even while returning to the stringent schedules of Britain’s Olympic coach Jürgen Gröbler, Triggs Hodge has taken on the elected (and unpaid) post of captain of the Hampton-based Molesey Boat Club; he regularly works 10- to 12-hour days there, working on club strategy and management, doing admin, encouraging the juniors. Like many of the gold medal fraternity, he seems disinclined to enjoy his laurels. He rarely reminds himself that he is an Olympic champion: “And whenever I do think about it, my first reaction is – don’t forget how hard it was.”

There’s a restlessness that is common to gold medallists, who seem keen to fill their time with new projects, goals, and ambitions. No one epitomises this better than Tim Brabants, who won kayaking gold in the K1-1,000m and bronze in the K1-500m. “Once the weight has lifted you feel like” – he sighs – ‘Now what?’” In Brabants’s case, the answer is a diary that would make super-ambassador Dame Kelly Holmes blanch. The canoeist has returned to his pre-Games career as a doctor at one of the busiest accident and emergency departments in the country, in the Queens Medical Centre in Nottingham, where he balances locum shifts with exam study and regular volunteering as course doctor at sports venues such as Donington Park. He has taken up triathlon and rowing, and in July raced in a four-man crew from Sark to Jersey. He has also taken on advisory roles with the London 2012 Organising Committee and the World Anti-Doping Agency, not to mention sponsors commitments and presentations, and has, on occasion, headed straight from an eight-hour night shift to talk at a school assembly. “I really like the way that my lifestyle is unconventional,” he smiles. “I like variety, and I can fit a lot into my time.”

On the first day of the Chelsea Flower Show in May, the celebrities are as much the exhibits as the gardens. A cluster of journalists has settled on a particular stall where Robert Winston and Stephen Fry are chattering amiably into dictaphones, and Victoria Pendleton is posing with a rose that has been bred especially for her. Wearing a tomato-coloured shift dress that she made herself, and a Burberry mac which is, she says, the single most expensive thing she has ever bought, she holds a gold medal in one hand and the yellowy-tangerine bloom (the closest to gold the growers could manage) in the other.

Pendleton seems to be enjoying herself and angles her demure smile this way and that to the great credit of the Royal Horticultural Society. She admits that she loves an excuse to glam up – this year has already brought several awards ceremonies, and a sashay down Stella McCartney’s catwalk at London Fashion Week. New frocks are needed for Ascot, Wimbledon and Buckingham Palace, where she is to receive an MBE.

Like every British Olympic champion, Pendleton received a welter of invitations in the immediate aftermath of the Games. Theoretically at least, it is possible for a gold medallist to live like a 19th-century dAndrew, eating out at other people’s expense for lunch and dinner every day, and scarcely needing to go home in between. “I remember having a chat with Rebecca [Romero] at one event and we were both saying this is a completely different world,” says Sarah Webb, who won her second Yngling gold in Beijing. “It was much, much bigger than Athens. By mid-November, I’d been out every lunch or dinner for weeks doing something and I thought, ‘I need to rein it in a bit because this isn’t normal. It would be nice to sit in and watch TV.’”

Pendleton now chooses to attend only the bare minimum of events; she says – and you suspect that she’s joking – that she only went to the British Olympic Association’s Gold Ball because they promised the athletes makeovers beforehand. “Sometimes you meet some fantastic people and you see celebrities and it’s fun,” she says. “But sometimes it is just hard work and you are looking around thinking, ‘Is it OK to leave now?’

“Yeah, you get invited to a nice dinner, but there are a million and one questions, you don’t kick back and enjoy yourself, you are working all the time, putting on your best face. There are only so many times you can repeat yourself before you feel like you’re reading off a script. Is it heavy? Yes, it is heavy. Is it really gold? No, it’s silver and gold plated. How did it feel? It was a dream come true that I can’t possibly put into words…”

The eddy of social engagements also contributes to another, more potent, illusion. If every time you see an Olympic champion they are wearing Amanda Wakeley or Paul Smith, clasping a glass of champagne or a royal gong, it is easy to believe they are on their way to becoming extremely wealthy. Even as the team landed at Heathrow last August – and were escorted from the first-class cabin to the VIP arrivals entrance – the chief executive of sponsorship at M&C Saatchi was claiming that they could soon be millionaires. “People don’t understand how much these guys could actually make,” Steve Martin said. “The potential is simply huge now.”

But most of the champions – with the exception of DeGale, who is giving the shops on Bond Street plenty of business – say that their financial situations have not changed at all. The suggestion that they are on their way to their first million is met with derision. Pendleton’s Burberry mac is one of only two treats she allowed herself; the other is a pair of Christian Louboutin heels. When Zac Purchase was asked if his earnings had been boosted by his rowing gold, he replied: “I got a pair of gold, limited-edition wellies… Does that count?”

Lottery funding notwithstanding, Brabants has always known he would need a second career. Canoeing offers no financial incentives, and while being recognised at the hospital might be a bizarre perk – a patient having a heart attack recently stopped him to say “You’re that Olympic doctor, aren’t you?” – the gold medal has had little other impact. “People do say that I must be making loads of money, but how?” he asks. “I’ve said yes to as much as I can, I have been to schools, universities, and businesses, taking every opportunity that has come my way, but I am no richer. Everybody wants you for free.”

Some of the top performers have picked up a few more personal sponsorships, or improved terms from the ones they already have. But in a tough financial climate where sponsors are increasingly demanding, and athletes training for London 2012 loth to compromise their training schedules, opportunities are necessarily limited. Some feel that their achievements are already forgotten, or considered last year’s news.

The same is true on the speaking circuit. Fees for corporate engagements can be anything from £1,000 to £25,000 a time, but after Beijing companies wanting a speaker for their business leadership seminar can choose between 27 different Olympic title holders rather than the usual one or two. Most Olympic champions training for 2012 are still reliant on their lottery funding, which doesn’t reward a gold medal – it stays at a maximum of £25,000 a year for anyone with “podium potential”, whether that’s gold or bronze. Moreover, lottery funding is means-tested – so a gold medallist’s rewards from outside earnings and sponsorship can end up diminishing it.

Back at the Flower Show, Pendleton wanders around the stalls. One man asks if she’s an exhibitor; she explains, patiently, that she is a guest, and shows him the buttonhole that was named after her and – when he doesn’t recognise the name – her gold medal. At another stall, a woman makes flippant references to Olympic athletes, before her husband quietly points out that she is talking to one. “I’m sure loads of people have asked you this but what does it feel like when you win?” he asks. Pendleton smiles and takes a breath. “Oh, it’s a dream come true…”

That’s actually a bit of a myth. Pendleton admits later that like most Olympic champions she has spoken to, she found the sensation rather underwhelming: not one of triumph or elation but of relief. “There’s not really any time to go ‘Oh my God!’” she says. “On the podium I was thinking, ‘I should be crying, why am I not crying?’ So I looked down at my medal and I just smirked – then I thought, ‘Don’t smirk during the national anthem, that’s probably treason.’ From the moment you win, everything is very clinically done: dope control, podium, media, home.”

In some ways, the British team have become victims of their own success. “The first time I rode for Great Britain in ’96,” says Chris Hoy, “there was one gold medal for the men’s coxless pairs, so if you won a bronze or a silver then you were pretty hot stuff. Now not only do you have to win a gold but you have to do it in a way that becomes memorable.” Among the returning champions, a hierarchy quickly became apparent, with those who won multiple individual golds scooping the best sponsorships and the acclaim, and those who won their medals as part of a team discipline all but forgotten (consider the last time you heard a story about cyclists Jason Kenny or Ed Clancy).

Thanks to his three individual golds, Hoy is at the centre of the bunfight, and nearest the buffet. The Sports Personality of the Year, Jaguar ambassador and face of Kellogg’s has also had a jumbo jet named after him and received a knighthood in the New Year Honours, and when we meet he is on yet another promotional day, this time for Skyride, a series of mass-participation cycling events taking place in cities across the UK in August. After Athens, Hoy said that a gold changed nothing about his life. Reminded of that, he laughs. “Yeah, yeah. I’ve eaten my words there a bit. The one thing I’ve had to change is that I’ve had to learn to say no to things. I used to be able to say yes to almost everything.” And while he admits he’s earning well, he says it still doesn’t put him among the ranks of most professional sportsmen. “Olympic athletes are very much amateur athletes. When you finish you’re going to have to start at the bottom rung of a different career somewhere else. Any money you get now is to offset that future loss.”

You wonder if he’s embarrassed by his lion’s share of the attention. Is it awkward, for instance, that he has a knighthood while everyone else, including those he trains with, had to settle for MBEs? Hoy says he doesn’t think that other athletes mind, and that it has happened before, to Kelly Holmes and to Steve Redgrave. But he admits he does find the hype rather bemusing. “Just because I won three gold medals doesn’t necessarily make me a better athlete than someone who can only compete in one event.”

One explanation for the phenomenon is that the public only have room in their collective consciousness for one male and one female icon from each Games. This year the lucky two have been Hoy and Rebecca Adlington. That has certainly been noticed by Brabants, Adlington’s Nottingham neighbour. Whenever he gets an invitation to a local event, he says candidly, it is because Adlington has turned it down.

Pendleton has often voiced her frustrations with the inequality of the situation: “When you see one of your team-mates gain so much fame and recognition you think, ‘Why can’t I have that too?’” A few weeks after the Flower Show, she appears on the cover of FHM. It’s a break from the usual goody-two-shoes image of the Olympic athlete – the public generally associates gold medallists with fibre-rich cereals, cholesterol-free margarine and house insurance. Pendleton says that some people thought it “unnecessary”, and others were surprised she hadn’t been paid for the shoot. “But I said: ‘When will I get asked to go on the front of a magazine?’” She laughs. “Plus I thought, ‘They are going to make you look hot.’”

“Vicky’s one of the few athletes that does really thrive on that,” Hoy says. “She loves the media spotlight and I think she measures her success by how much attention she gets, which is crazy because she’s the best in the world at what she does. That’s one of the things I always try to say to her, enjoy your success. If you could say to her four years ago that this is what you’re going to achieve she’d be over the moon, but she measures her performance against her public recognition.”

In June, OSM meets Pendleton again. She recently promoted a project for Sky with Elle Macpherson; apparently Macpherson was surprised to find that Vicky could ride a bike. Recognition, it seems, is still not forthcoming. She sighs. “I’ve done pretty much everything I can and I’m still an unknown. I’m giving up on that whole thing. It’s never going to happen. Never mind, it wasn’t what I set out to do in the first place. Get down to training, do my job.”

The day before Sarah Webb’s gold medal race, Adam Gosling, her boyfriend of four years, arrived in Qingdao. They had arranged not to meet until after the competition, but a lack of wind had delayed the Yngling final by 24 hours, and Gosling was insistent – he had to see her. Webb said he could have half an hour, and went along to his hotel room. He proposed. “I actually thought he was joking,” she says now. “But he’d decided he was going to do it that Saturday, and he’s an absolute stickler for a plan.”

Paranoid about the ring – it wasn’t insured – Gosling insisted she it tie to the waistband of her tracksuit. Webb hid it until after the race, telling no one about the engagement. It was only on the podium that friends watching on TV spotted a shiny glint, and it was 10pm before her sailing partners noticed the new accessory.

They married in February and had their reception at St James’s Palace, where they received special permission from the Queen to take their dog, Derek. With the Yngling class no longer an Olympic event, Webb decided to retire from sailing. She and Gosling busied themselves with plans to demolish their London house and replace it with an ecohome; she also took a broadcast journalism course and filed her first reports for BBC Radio 5 Live. As if that weren’t enough, they also agreed to join a nine-day, 880-mile charity cycle from Land’s End to John O’Groats, along with another recently married couple, Webb’s fellow “Yngling Belle” Sarah Ayton and windsurfer Nick Dempsey. When we catch up in June, Gosling is at the wheel of a motorhome, on the A466 in Monmouthshire, with a heavily pregnant Ayton in the navigator’s seat. Webb, Dempsey and the rest of the cycling team are about a mile behind the support vehicle, at the bottom of a very steep Welsh hill.

Post-Beijing, life has changed as much for Gosling as for his wife. For the three years in the run-up to the Games, he only saw Webb one week in every four. Now they see each other every day, and it’s a big adjustment although, he adds quickly, a pleasant one. There has been drama, too: on a ski slope in February, Gosling fell and broke his neck, ironically enough while turning round to check on Webb; he was confined to their house for five weeks afterwards. “It was actually really good for us,” says Webb, “because we hadn’t spent more than two weeks in one place together.”

The year after a Games tends to be a busy one for couples. An Olympic campaign is a pretty self-centred experience, not to mention a fairly monastic one, and for athletes who do much of their training and competing abroad, in warm-weather climates, relationships have to be long-distance. Even for Ayton and Dempsey, who compete at the same regattas, the tyranny of their respective training commitments meant that they stayed engaged for eight years before finally tying the knot last October. The bride had started her wedding preparations the year before Athens.

The quadrennial round of engagements, weddings and pregnancies is an established part of the Olympic cycle. Chris Hoy proposed to his girlfriend, Sarra, on a trip to Prague in April. They met three years ago in a pub in Edinburgh and he says he knew straight away that she was the right girl for him: “It was just about me trying to persuade her likewise.” But with Sarra working as a solicitor in Edinburgh, and Hoy training full-time at the velodrome in Manchester, they had become used to a weekly routine of emotional ups and downs: the anticipation of a Friday-night meeting, and the misery of the drive back to the airport on Sunday. Since the engagement Sarra has found a job in Manchester – Hoy, injured in a crash in February, is back on his bike and preparing for October’s World Cup. “Finally we’ll be able to spend time together,” he says. “It’s nice to have something on the horizon just for the two of us.”

Pendleton didn’t even have time for a relationship before the Games. She had been out on a few dates with sports performance scientist Scott Gardner, but that was as far as it had got – the Olympics, naturally, came first. She says that one of the best things about post-Beijing life has been having time to develop that relationship, and spend more time with family – her parents, her sister Nicola and her twin brother Alex.

Gardner has since moved in to Pendleton’s house in Wilmslow, Cheshire. She says she has been lucky to find a man who is willing to adapt his lifestyle to that of an elite sportswoman. She is tyrannical about her sleep regime – she goes to bed early, gets up late, and hates to be disturbed – and has similarly inflexible eating habits. “Scott lives by my rules,” she admits. “I have to do things certain ways for the sake of my performance, so anyone else has to fit in. It sounds terrible, but he understands. After all, it’s not forever.”

But it is not always so easy for athletes to slot into a new, shared lifestyle. “What Sarah [Ayton] and I have noticed most since Beijing is how selfish you are,” says Webb. “How hard it is to be normal and not put yourself first in everything.” Triggs Hodge, too, admits to a nervous anticipation of September when his girlfriend Anneka, who currently lives in the Netherlands, is due to move in with him. “There is a good chance that she’ll be astonished at how little I am going to be at home,” he admits.

Webb still weighs her porridge out on the scales each morning – 25 grams only – and religiously records her heart rate data, uploading it to her home PC “which is of no use to anybody”. Gosling notes that without a goal to pursue, she became quite low. “This cycle ride is the first time she’s really come alive again,” he says.

So will Webb change her mind, and come out of retirement? She looks torn. “In the lead-up to Beijing, even before we’d won, we’d done it so well I didn’t know how we were going to better it.” There’s a long pause. “But then, when you see everyone else sailing you think… it’s very hard. It would be a bit premature to say never.”

“Becoming Olympic champion seems like an end goal,” says Brabants, who will defend his K1-1,000m gold in 2012. “But it ends up being a stepping stone. It’s hard to put away that drive and determination.”

Witness Pendleton who, only five days after her victory in the Olympic sprint final, put herself back in training for March’s world championships. The team management had told the gold medallists they need not compete – they had too little time to prepare properly, and scarcer motivation. Pendleton knew all this – no track cyclist had ever followed up on their Olympic title at the next year’s world – but she couldn’t help herself. “I just can’t bear the idea of someone else standing on top of that podium and putting my jersey on,” she told me, after defending her sprint title. “An individual medal won at the Olympics isn’t going to sustain a lifetime of satisfaction for me.”

When Hoy crashed in February, the injury to his hip forced him to sit out 10 weeks of the cycling season, and miss the world championships for the first time in his career. It was the longest he had been off his bike since he was seven. “If I’d sat at home watching the world championships and thought, ‘You know what, it’s quite nice to be sitting here with a beer in my hand watching the TV,’ that would have been a bad sign,” he says. “But I was desperate to be up there. Even though it would have been a very compromised preparation and I wouldn’t have been in the best shape of my life. I may not have won anything at all, and I knew that was a risk, but I would never not race just because I was afraid of losing.”

Pendleton worries that winning the sprint again in 2012 will not be challenge enough for her; she is hoping that the Olympic committee will expand the women’s track cycling programme to include more races that she can contest. But you wonder whether anything can bring her true satisfaction. And she’s not alone.

“You come away with two gold medals and you think your life’s made,” says Webb. “But I’m not sure anything’s different at all.”

Q+A: James DeGale

How does life compare with last year?

The change is unbelievable. People recognising me, stopping me in the street. I’m not a millionaire but I’m comfortable now – it’s much easier to buy the clothes I like.

How are you finding professional boxing?

Fantastic. Your attitude has to be different, no nonsense. I was very nervous before the first fight, and I still find the dieting hard.

Do you still have a party lifestyle?

I’m normally too knackered. I’m training twice a day and by the time I get back from the gym all I want to do is sleep. But it ain’t totally stopped …

Q+A: Victoria Pendleton

Have you had a holiday since the Games?

After the worlds I went to Tasmania – I really needed a break by then. I tried to relax but I still got edgy and ended up going to the gym.

How have you found the return to training?

I feel so out of shape I hate myself. And I have off days where I hate riding my bike. When you’ve been in form like you were at the Olympics, everything else is a step down.

How do you motivate yourself for 2012?

I am still working on that. If it wasn’t in London I don’t know if I would bother.

Q+A: Sarah Webb

How did you find the post-Games hype?

You get swept away on the emotion of it; when it stops it’s hard because you think: now what?

And now you’ve gone into journalism…

The people in radio always seemed really nice, and I’d thought in Athens that I might like to try it. So I went on a couple of courses and I’ve just done my first show for BBC 5 Live.

Do your gold medals change your outlook?

I don’t sit and look at my medals, and I’m quite shy about showing them to people. But it does make you realise that you can do anything if you decide to do it.

Q+A: Chris Hoy

Are you enjoying the attention?

It’s lovely, but it takes some getting used to. It makes getting sponsorship easier, but I’m not earning a footballer’s salary.

How did the crash affect your year?

Because I wasn’t training I’ve been trying to cram in all my other obligations, and it’s exhausting. It sounds pathetic but it really is.

After three golds, what goals are left?

Two more in London would give me five golds and a silver, which is more than anybody has won for Britain. That’s a nice target.

Q+A: Tim Brabants

Have you been asked to do a naked calendar?

No, and I’d turn that down. I was emailed asking what my favourite biscuit was, though.

Did you need time off from kayaking this year?

Not so much time off as time to move my medical career forward – it’s difficult to progress when you’re only working part-time.

Has interest in your sport remained?

I think sports in which Britain did well will stay in the public eye more through to 2012. I hope it inspires kids to realise they might have talent in a sport that isn’t football – often you are only exposed to what’s available.

Q+A: Andrew Triggs Hodge

What did you do after Beijing?

I took a three-week holiday, at a profitable time for medallists. But I needed a break and the Azores haven’t heard of the Olympics.

How easy is it to go back to training?

It’s “welcome back to reality”. But I do regret that I don’t have a social life any more.

Does the gold improve your 2012 chances?

The medal is just this bit of metal and I’ve got to make sure I am ticking Jürgen’s boxes now and not then. It’s like walking a tightrope: the further you get from base the harder it gets.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Police powers for 2012 Olympics alarm critics

• Civil rights activists say new law curbs free speech
• Rules could allow officials to raid private homes

The government was accused tonight of giving itself draconian powers to clamp down on protests at the 2012 Olympics. Critics said the powers were so broad they would potentially give private contractors the right to forcibly enter people’s homes and seize materials.

Opposition parties and civil liberties groups criticised the powers as top security officials announced plans concerned with keeping the games, to be held mostly in London, safe from terrorist attack and from “domestic extremists” and public order problems like disruptive protests.

The legislation is directed at curbing advertising near the Olympic venues. A government spokesperson said the laws, passed in 2006, were meant to stop “over-commercialisation” of the games.

But civil rights campaigners are worried about several clauses in the London Olympic Games and Games Act 2006. Section 19(4) could cover protest placards, they said, as it read: “The regulations may apply in respect of advertising of any kind including in particular – (a) advertising of a non-commercial nature, and (b) announcements or notices of any kind.”

Section 22 allows a “constable or enforcement officer” to “enter land or premises” where they believe such an advert is being shown or produced. It allows for materials to be destroyed, and for the use of “reasonable force”. The power to force entry requires a court warrant. Causing still further concern is a section granting the powers to an enforcement officer appointed by Olympic Delivery Authority.

Anita Coles, policy officer for Liberty, said: “This goes much further than protecting the Olympic logo for commercial use. Regulations could ban signs urging boycotts of sponsors with sweat shops. Then private contractors designated by the Olympic authority could enter homes and other premises in the vicinity, seizing or destroying private property.”

The Liberal Democrats’ home affairs spokesman, Chris Huhne, said: “This sort of police action runs the risk of using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. The police should take a deep breath and read the excellent report from the chief inspector of constabulary on the tolerance of protest. We should aim to show the Chinese that you can run a successful Olympics without cracking down on protesters and free speech.”

Chris Grayling, the shadow home secretary, said: “This is a government who just doesn’t understand civil liberties – they may claim these powers won’t be used but the frank truth is no one will believe them. Neither the police nor any other official should be invading people’s homes for what appear to be commercial reasons.”

A senior government security official said the powers would not be used to suppress protests or political placards. And the assistant commissioner, Chris Alison, in charge of the policing of the 2012 Olympics, said: “We are not going into people’s houses to stop people protesting.”

But Peter McNeil, who opposes the staging of equestrian events in Greenwich park, told BBC London: “This is dreadful. It’s bullying taken to another level.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said the legal provisions on games advertising were meant to “prevent ambush marketing – not prevent or restrict lawful protests”.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Sandcity at the Olympic Park

For two months now, the Olympic Park has been living with its sand sculptures. Despite the rain and the odd storm, they are still standing. But they are only made of sand…

 

Ephemeral heroes
The two giant sculptures were created as part of the Heroes exhibition at The Olympic Museum in Lausanne until 13 September. Because of the material used to make them, they symbolise the fact that the glory and fame of the athletes celebrated in the exhibition can be as ephemeral as a castle made of sand…

 

Seventy-five tons of sand…
Seventy-five tons of sand were needed to produce these statues. They were created by Dutch sculptors who specialise in these kinds of works, which they create on beaches or in supermarkets. Once the subject is sculpted, it is sprayed with a mixture of water and glue, which holds the whole thing together.

 

… for two giant sculptures
There are two of these statues. The first, standing 2.5m tall, represents the great Michael Phelps, whose achievements in Beijing last year (eight gold medals) astounded the world. The second, 5 metres high, pays tribute to sports heroes from various eras. These include the Greek Spiridon Louis, the first Olympic and marathon champion, in 1896 in Athens; boxer Muhammad Ali; the German skater Katarina Witt, who made her name with her unforgettable Carmen; and the man who is now the greatest tennis player of all time, Switzerland’s Roger Federer…

 

The statues will remain on show until 13 September, when the Heroes exhibition closes. On that day, the public will be invited to destroy these magnificent, but rightly ephemeral creations…
 

 Find out more about Sandcity and their amazing compositions.

Ones to watch

Asafa Powell   The Jamaican will take on compatriot and triple Olympic gold medallist Usain Bolt over 100m at the London Grand Prix on Friday.   Powell is Commonwealth champion and has never lost over 100m at Crystal Palace having completed his past three races in less than 10 seconds. BoltAsafa Powell The Jamaican will take on compatriot and triple Olympic gold medallist Usain Bolt over 100m at the London Grand Prix on Friday. Powell is Commonwealth champion and has never lost over 100m at Crystal Palace having completed his past three races in less than 10 seconds. Bolt

Meeting in Lausanne between the IOC and the delegation of Kuwait authorities

Following a fruitful meeting between a delegation of Kuwait Authorities, headed by H.E. the Minister of Social Affairs and Labour in Kuwait, and a delegation of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) headed by the IOC President, which took place on 15 July 2009 in Lausanne, the following agreement was reached:

 

  1. The Kuwait Authorities expressed their willingness to find an appropriate and suitable solution in order to avoid the suspension of the Kuwait Olympic Committee and the Kuwait Olympic Movement, in particular by ensuring that the national sports law and regulations in Kuwait will be compatible with (i) the Olympic Charter and (ii) the rules of the respective International Olympic Sports Federations.

 

  1. For that purpose, it was agreed that the Kuwait Government would take a Decision by 31 July 2009 at the latest in order to ensure that the process of reviewing the national sports law and regulations in order to make them compatible with the Olympic Charter and the rules of the respective International Olympic Sports Federations will be undertaken with the Kuwait Parliament.

 

  1. Also, it was agreed that the whole process of amendments of the sports law must be finalised by 31 December 2009 at the latest.

 

  1. Lastly, it was agreed that each National Sports Federation shall have the capacity and the responsibility to draft its own statutes in accordance with the principles of the Olympic Charter and the rules of their respective International Sports Federations and in close coordination with them.

 

If necessary, the IOC together with the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) will offer assistance to the Kuwait Authorities, on a technical level, in order to ensure that the Kuwait sports law and regulations are compatible with the Olympic Charter and the rules of the International Olympic Sports Federations concerned.

 

Should the Kuwait Authorities be unable to respect any steps noted above, the decision of the IOC Executive Board would be immediately enforced and the suspension of the Kuwait Olympic Committee would come into effect.

 

###

 

Note to editors:

 

Participants:
 
International Olympic Committee (IOC):
-          Mr Jacques Rogge, IOC President
-          Mr Christophe de Kepper, IOC Chief of Staff
-          Mr Pere Miró, Director, IOC NOC Relations Department
-          Mr Jérôme Poivey, Project Manager, IOC NOC Relations Department

 

Kuwait Delegation:
-          H.E. Dr Mohammad Mohsen AL-AFASI, Minister of Social Affairs and Labour
-          H.E. Dr Suhail K. SHUHAIBER, Ambassador of the State of Kuwait in Switzerland
-          H.E. Mr Fisal ALJAZZAF, Chairman of the Board and Director General of the Public Authority for Youth and Sport (PAYS)
-          Mr Abdulwahab ALBANNAI, Vice-Chairman of the PAYS Board of Directors
-          Dr Jawad KHALAF, Member of the PAYS Board of Directors

 

For more information please contact the IOC Communications Department,

Tel: +41 21 621 60 00, email: pressoffice@olympic.org, or visit our website at www.olympic.org

Logan Campbell Opens Brothel To Fund Olympic Dream

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) – A New Zealand taekwondo athlete has opened a brothel to help fund his bid to compete at the 2012 London Olympics, local media reported Sunday.

Logan Campbell, 23, told the Sunday Star-Times newspaper he hoped hi…

Olympic hopeful opens NZ brothel to fund 2012 bid

Prostitute in Sydney (file pic)

An Olympic hopeful from New Zealand has opened a brothel in a bid to raise cash for a tilt at taekwondo glory in 2012.

Logan Campbell, 23, competed at Beijing in 2008, but has now opened a 14-room "gentleman’s club" after becoming tired of seeking funding from his parents.

New Zealand decriminalised prostitution six years ago, and brothels are allowed to operate with few restrictions.

But NZ Olympic officials say Campbell’s business venture may count against him when choosing a team for London 2012.

"Selection takes into account not just performance but also the athlete’s ability to serve as an example to the youth of the country," Team NZ funding manager John Schofield told the country’s Sunday Star Times newspaper.

Training schedule

Logan Campbell says he began looking for alternative ways of raising Olympic funding when he realised how difficult it was proving to raise adequate cash to make support his training towards a place at the London Olympics.

"Mum was hesitant but she met the girls, a couple came over to her house and she was sweet as"

Logan Campbell

Logan Campbell (left) fights Sung Yu-Chi

Competing in Beijing a year ago, Campbell lost to a Taiwanese fighter, Sung Yu-Chi, who eventually won a bronze medal.

Speaking to the Sunday Star Times, Campbell noted that his opponent was the equivalent of a "movie star" in his homeland.

His own costs leading up to Beijing totalled some NZ$150,000 (£58,000), much of it provided by his hard-working parents, Campbell noted.

To take the financial strain from his parents Campbell has gone into partnership with a Hugo Philiips, 20-year-old accountancy graduate, to set up what the pair insist is a "high-class" escort agency.

He hopes to take a couple of years off to work full-time on the new venture, before returning to training in 2011 with a NZ$300,000 Olympic kitty.

NZ PROSTITUTION REFORM ACT

  • Brothels allowed to operate
  • Up to four prostitutes can set up collective as equal partners
  • Advertising sale of sex legalised
  • Brothels require certificate and registration by court
  • Sex work subject to normal employment and health and safety standards

"When people think of a pimp they think of a guy standing around on a street corner with gold chains," he told the Sunday Star Times.

"Pimps are more tough-type guys. I’m an owner of an escort agency."

He accepts that his chosen profession carries with it a certain reputation.

"Mum was hesitant but she met the girls, a couple came over to her house and she was sweet as. She realised they were just normal people supporting their kids and stuff." </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Preparation for the Algerian NOCÂ’s next elective General Assembly

After the meeting held on 8 July 2009, at the headquarters of the Algerian Olympic Committee (COA), and the constructive and fruitful discussions held in an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect between the delegation of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the IOC member in Algeria and representatives of the COA and the Algerian sports federations, the undersigned have agreed on the following points:
 
     1. There is a common desire to find a suitable and sustainable solution to the COA’s current situation, the aim of which will be to re-unify the Algerian Olympic family and guarantee the unity of the Algerian Olympic Movement, in everyone’s interest and that of the Algerian athletes as a priority.
     2. To do this, the COA elective General Assembly should be held in calm conditions, with no external interference and with the participation of all the legitimate members of the COA, on the basis of this agreement, the statutes of the COA in force and the Olympic Charter.
     3. The legitimate leaders of the COA, as currently recognised by the IOC, will continue to manage all the COA’s everyday activities until the elective General Assembly is held.
     4. The process and operations leading up to this elective General Assembly will be placed under the responsibility of a preparatory electoral commission set up on this occasion, whose essential functions will be to:
          a. Define the procedures, conditions and terms of the elections within the  framework of the COA statutes.
          b. Define the timetable leading up to the elections and the precise date of this elective General Assembly.
          c. Implement the whole of this process.
 
This electoral commission will be made up of five members: a chairman to be determined, the COA Secretary General, a member of the COA, and two members representing the Algerian sports federations that are members of the COA.
 
This electoral commission will regularly inform the IOC of the evolution of the situation and the various stages of this process.
 
     5. The IOC will supervise the smooth running of the process and ensure compliance with these agreements. Furthermore, the IOC will be available for the COA and the electoral commission to give it the necessary directions and facilitate the accomplishment of the process.
###

 

For more information please contact the IOC Communications Department,
Tel: +41 21 621 60 00, email: pressoffice@olympic.org,
or visit our website at www.olympic.org.

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE STATEMENT

While we are pleased that the Games can now proceed as planned, we strongly disagree with the court’s analysis that the IOC acted in a discriminatory manner. As previously explained, our decision was based on technical issues, without regard to gender.
 
The IOC will continue to follow the development of women’s ski jumping and remains open to considering its possible inclusion in the Sochi Games in 2014. We understand and appreciate how important inclusion is to the dedicated athletes who participate in the sport.

 

We also welcome the court’s recognition that that “the IOC in recent years has supported the inclusion of women in the Olympics and in amateur sports." and the observation that, “The IOC has implemented a wide range of initiatives to increase women’s involvement in leadership and administration within the Olympic movement and the wider sporting community."

 

The judgment goes on to say, “VANOC points out that these are not empty words or empty policies; women now compete in approximately 48% of the events at the Winter Olympics and the percentage of female athletes has steadily increased to just over 40%” (quote from pages 34-35 of court decision)

 

 
###
For further information, please contact the IOC Communications Department, Tel: +41 21 621 60 00, email: pressoffice@olympic.org

Ones to watch

Fabian Cancellara   The Saxo Bank rider and current Olympic gold-medallist will have a tough task in maintaining his form in the Tour de France this week. Having won the first stage and currently wearing the yellow jersey, he is hot favourite, but with seven-time champion Lance Armstrong showingFabian Cancellara The Saxo Bank rider and current Olympic gold-medallist will have a tough task in maintaining his form in the Tour de France this week. Having won the first stage and currently wearing the yellow jersey, he is hot favourite, but with seven-time champion Lance Armstrong showing

The premier event

How can we keep the Olympic Games as a premier event? This is one of numerous questions that will be debated at the Olympic Congress in Copenhagen between 2 and 3 October 2009, where approximately 900 delegates will get together to shape the future of the Olympic Movement. The recent successes of the Olympic Games in Athens, Turin and Beijing will allow the IOC to reflect on lessons learned and to find even better ways to position the Olympic Games.
 
 The athletes are at the heart of the Games, and at the end of the day it is their outstanding performances that are remembered. Mexico City 1968 with Bob Beamon’s historic jump; Grenoble 1968 with Jean-Claude Killy’s triple medal win; Munich 1972 when Mark Spitz became a legend; Montreal 1976 with Nadia Comaneci’s perfect tens. Not forgetting Eric Heiden, Carl Lewis, Hermann Maier, Björn Daehlie and most recently Shaun White, Usain Bolt and Michael Phelps. It’s these performances and memorable Olympic ceremonies that drive the IOC, Organising Committees, National Olympic Committees and International Sports Federations to work hard to provide the most adapted environment in which to compete and perform. The Copenhagen debate will strive to provide solutions to make the Olympic Games stronger and even more enjoyable. Enjoy watching all the highlights of previous Games in this video.