Reacting sharply to the killing of a toddler and his father by Hizbul militants, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Friday termed the silence of separatist leaders over the barbaric killing in Shopian town as “hypocriticalâ€.
“Why are separatist leaders silent on this issue? Where are Yasin Malik and other separatist leaders? This [...]
Posts Tagged ‘Omar’
Omar Abdullah sees ‘hypocrisy’ in separatists†silence over toddler’s killing
Food in the life of Nelson Mandela
The most elementary social, economic and emotional truths are revealed in the ways that we we cook, eat and serve food. So why not ask those who changed the world what they were eating while they did it?
Recipes
Mrs Vervoed’s koeksisters
George Bizos’s oregano and lemon lamb
Farida Omar’s chicken curry
Xoliswa Ndoyiya’s umphokoqo
In his autobiography Nelson Mandela declared that:
“I was not born with a hunger to be free. I was born free. Free in every way that I could know. Free to run in the fields near my mother’s hut, free to swim in the clear stream that ran through my village, free to roast mealies [corn] under the stars … It was only when I learnt that my boyhood freedom was an illusion … that I began to hunger for it.”
Only the truly food obsessed would read such a statement and consider the stomach from whence it came, but I did and the result is a gastro-political biography entitled Hunger for Freedom, the story of food in the life of Nelson Mandela.
There are those who might argue that such an evaluation is trivial or even tasteless, but there is nothing innately frivolous or disrespectful about food. We all reveal our most elementary social, economic and emotional truths in the ways that we cook, eat and serve food. So why not ask those who changed the world what they were eating while they did it?
Hunger for Freedom traces Nelson Mandela’s journey in food reminiscences and recipes from the corn grinding stone of his Mvezo birthplace and simple dishes like umphokoqo through wedding cakes, prison hunger strikes and presidential banquets into a retirement deliciously infused with the Mozambican seafood dishes of his third wife Graça Machel.
In the course of the research for my book I tracked down the former South African President’s schoolboy contemporaries who put on a traditional Xhosa rural feast for me. I shared biscuits and memories of teenage dinner dates with his first girlfriend. I made his favourite spaghetti recipe with Winnie Madikizela-Mandela as she told of a great love lost and thwarted. I wept through ex-prisoners’ descriptions of Robben Island prison rations and roared with laughter at his grandchildren’s tales of the great man’s fondness for Frosties breakfast cereal.
There were Christmas cakes with former jailers and crab curries with comrades past. I was very pregnant throughout much of the research process and to hear Nelson Mandela reminisce about chicken recipes (and offer to deliver the baby) was a huge privilege and an absolute joy.
Looking at Nelson Mandela’s personal and political history from the vantage point of the kitchen offered up hitherto unrecorded insights into a man and the society in which he came of age. In apartheid South Africa every dish was served against a backdrop of racial oppression. In the 1950s parties given by anti-apartheid activists saw drinks served in very short tots so as to ensure that if the police raided the event black people would not be found engaged in the illegal act of consuming alcohol.
The guest list for Nelson Mandela’s 1958 wedding to Winnie Madikizela was profoundly curtailed by the fact that almost every significant political activist was banned, jailed or in exile. The racially discriminatory food conditions for prisoners on Robben Island and the prisoners’ fights to improve their diet mirrored those of their broader struggle.
And yet Nelson Mandela’s food preferences past and present reveal the social and political significance of a multi-racial anti-apartheid alliance in which Thayanagee Pillay made coffee for prisoners awaiting trial, Farida Omar smuggled chicken curry to Nelson Mandela at Pollsmoor Prison, George Bizos cooked Greek lamb on a spit to celebrate great victories and Ray Harmel served chopped liver in times of trouble.
The history of South Africa’s transition to democracy can be read on a plate from Mandela’s first meal of freedom (Lillian Ngoboza’s hearty casserole followed by rum and raisin ice-cream at Bishop Tutu’s house) through the gastro-reconciliation of syrup-drenched koeksister with the widow of apartheid architect HF Vervoed in the whites only enclave of Orania. Similarly, Nelson Mandela’s personal transition from President to pensioner can be tasted in his housekeeper Xoliswa Ndoyiya’s chutney chicken recipe and Graça Machel’s caranguejo recheado (stuffed crabs).
Mandela media coverage has a somewhat saccharine tendency to deify South Africa’s most famous son. Asking what he had for lunch restores humanity to a living legend. It also recognizes that he was not acting alone but rather as part of a social and political team. Besides, the man himself has always been justifiably proud of his edible exploits. On August 31 1970 Madiba wrote to his wife Winnie from Robben Island prison:
“How I long for amasi (traditional South African fermented milk), thick and sour! You know darling there is one respect in which I dwarf all my contemporaries or at least about which I can confidently claim to be second to none – healthy appetite.”
Bashir Ahmad Gwakh: Britney Spears’ Ex for President
Adnan Ghalib, ex-boyfriend of Britney Spears, is facing the possibility of being deported to his home country, Afghanistan. Back in his ancestral homeland, a great opportunity is awaiting the former photographer.
Your Taxpayer Dollars Were Used to Torture Children
I have repeatedly written that the U.S. has tortured children as part of the war on terror (and see this).In an excellent new article, Daily Kos adds the following information:President Jimmy Carter wrote that the Red Cross, Amnesty International and t…
Extremists ‘have French hostages’

A second French hostage has been handed over to the hard-line Somali Islamist group, al-Shabab, government sources have told the BBC.
"If they are in the hands of al-Shabab it is very, very serious," said a source in the Somali presidency. The group carries out public executions.
The first man was reportedly given to al-Shabab on Thursday.
The two security advisers, who were training government troops, were seized from a Mogadishu hotel on Tuesday.
BBC East Africa correspondent Will Ross says that, unlike other insurgent groups in Somalia, al-Shabab is unlikely to be holding the men for ransom.
In its eyes, the pair would be enemies, he says.
"They could kill them, saying they are Christian, not Islamic and they could manipulate the situation for their own political demands, including their call for African Union troops to leave," the presidential source told the BBC.
He said the government was not able to negotiate directly with al-Shabab but had been talking to people claiming to be linked to the group holding the two French men.
Public killings
Al-Shabab and its ally Hizbul-Islam are fighting the UN-backed interim government and together control much of southern Somalia.
Both groups are said to have links to al-Qaeda and have been reinforced by foreign fighters.
Meeting al-Shabab Somali justice, Islamist-style
A group of gunmen dressed in military uniform seized the men on Tuesday morning and handed them over to Hizbul-Islam.
The move apparently sparked a row with al-Shabab, which now seems to have persuaded the other group to hand the two men over.
BBC Somali Service editor Yusuf Garaad Omar says al-Shabab is known for being the more radical of the two groups.
He says al-Shabab cares little for its public image and has carried out killings on camera.
Somali Prime Minister Omar Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke on Thursday warned Hizbul-Islam it would "bear responsibility for any harmful action taken against the hostages".
The French advisers were helping to train the forces of the government, which has recently appealed for foreign help to tackle the Islamists.
The US last month confirmed that it has sent weapons to the government, which is also being protected by some 4,000 African Union troops in Mogadishu.
Somalia has not had a functioning national government since 1991.
Moderate Islamist Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed was sworn in as president in January after UN-brokered peace talks.
He promised to introduce Sharia law but the hardliners accuse him of being a western stooge.</p
This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
Taliban: Will Kill Captured US Soldier If Military Ops Continue
KABUL — Local Taliban commanders threatened Thursday to kill a captured American soldier unless the U.S. military stops operations in two districts of southeastern Afghanistan.
The Taliban claimed last week to be holding the soldier, wh…
Charles Taylor: war crimes case built on lies
Former Liberian leader says accusations that he supported rebels in Sierra Leone war are based on lies and rumours
The former Liberian president Charles Taylor has taken the stand in his own defence at his war crimes trial and says the case against him is built on lies.
Taylor, the first African head of state to be tried by an international court, is charged with 11 counts of murder, torture, rape, sexual slavery, using child soldiers and spreading terror. Prosecutors at the United Nations-backed special court for Sierra Leone say he supported rebels in that country to help gain control of it and strip its vast mineral wealth.
He told the court the allegations against him are based on “disinformation, misinformation, lies, rumours.”
Some of the 91 witnesses called so far have claimed Taylor shipped weapons to rebels in rice sacks in contravention of an arms embargo, and in return received “blood diamonds” mined by slave labour.
Taylor, 61, has pleaded not guilty. His lawyer, Courtenay Griffiths, said the former leader would today begin what is expected to be several weeks of testimony because he wanted to set the record straight.
Griffiths said Taylor would testify about his “strenuous efforts to bring peace in Sierra Leone”.
He urged the judges to give Taylor a fair hearing, and not to be overwhelmed by the parade of misery presented by the prosecution since the trial opened 18 months ago.
One prosecution witness who took the stand had stumps where his hands had been hacked off. A woman testified that she was forced to carry a sack full of severed heads, including those of her children. One of Taylor’s former aides told judges he was with Taylor when the president ate a human liver.
“No one who has seen the procession through this courtroom of hurt human beings reliving the most grotesque trauma would have been unmoved,” Griffiths, who is from Britain, told the three-judge panel. “We are human too, even while we declare this accused man to be not guilty of the charges he faces.”
Taylor’s trial has been hailed as a ground-breaking example of making an autocrat face responsibility for the human rights violations that occurred on his watch.
Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, has refused to answer a summons by the international criminal court, which is based in The Hague, to respond to charges of crimes against humanity in Darfur. Most African leaders have supported Bashir in his defiance and refuse to arrest him.
Taylor completed an economics degree in the US and military training in Libya before rising to power as a rebel warlord in Liberia and being elected president in 1997.
He is accused of supporting the Revolutionary United Front in Sierra Leone in its fight to depose President Joseph Momoh and his successors. Prosecutors say Taylor trained in Libya with the front’s leader, Foday Sankoh.
About 500,000 people are estimated to have been victims of killings, systematic mutilation and other atrocities in the civil war that lasted from 1991 until 2002. Some of the worst crimes were carried out by gangs of child soldiers, who were given drugs to desensitise them.
In an emotional opening statement, Griffiths cast Taylor as a peacemaker who was too busy defending democracy in Liberia to “micromanage” atrocities committed by rebels in Sierra Leone.
Griffiths said Taylor was not behind the use of children in conflict. “Child soldiers were not a Charles Taylor invention,” he said.
The former president sat impassively in court wearing a brown double-breasted suit, brown tie and dark glasses.
Taylor is being tried in a courtroom rented from the international criminal court because of fears that trying him in Sierra Leone could spark renewed violence.
At the court’s headquarters in the Sierra Leone capital, Freetown, the public galleries of two courtrooms were packed with survivors, students, police and community leaders who watched a live satellite broadcast of the opening statement.
In Liberia, a civil rights advocate, Boakai Jalieba, said the case was being closely followed there.
“We in Liberia have to take keen interest in the trial because the wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone had too many similarities, they had some common identities; Liberians were recruited to go to Sierra Leone and Sierra Leoneans fought here,” he said.
Charles Taylor: war crimes case built on lies
Former Liberian leader says accusations that he supported rebels in Sierra Leone war are based on lies and rumours
The former Liberian president Charles Taylor has taken the stand in his own defence at his war crimes trial and says the case against him is built on lies.
Taylor, the first African head of state to be tried by an international court, is charged with 11 counts of murder, torture, rape, sexual slavery, using child soldiers and spreading terror. Prosecutors at the United Nations-backed special court for Sierra Leone say he supported rebels in that country to help gain control of it and strip its vast mineral wealth.
He told the court the allegations against him are based on “disinformation, misinformation, lies, rumours.”
Some of the 91 witnesses called so far have claimed Taylor shipped weapons to rebels in rice sacks in contravention of an arms embargo, and in return received “blood diamonds” mined by slave labour.
Taylor, 61, has pleaded not guilty. His lawyer, Courtenay Griffiths, said the former leader would today begin what is expected to be several weeks of testimony because he wanted to set the record straight.
Griffiths said Taylor would testify about his “strenuous efforts to bring peace in Sierra Leone”.
He urged the judges to give Taylor a fair hearing, and not to be overwhelmed by the parade of misery presented by the prosecution since the trial opened 18 months ago.
One prosecution witness who took the stand had stumps where his hands had been hacked off. A woman testified that she was forced to carry a sack full of severed heads, including those of her children. One of Taylor’s former aides told judges he was with Taylor when the president ate a human liver.
“No one who has seen the procession through this courtroom of hurt human beings reliving the most grotesque trauma would have been unmoved,” Griffiths, who is from Britain, told the three-judge panel. “We are human too, even while we declare this accused man to be not guilty of the charges he faces.”
Taylor’s trial has been hailed as a ground-breaking example of making an autocrat face responsibility for the human rights violations that occurred on his watch.
Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, has refused to answer a summons by the international criminal court, which is based in The Hague, to respond to charges of crimes against humanity in Darfur. Most African leaders have supported Bashir in his defiance and refuse to arrest him.
Taylor completed an economics degree in the US and military training in Libya before rising to power as a rebel warlord in Liberia and being elected president in 1997.
He is accused of supporting the Revolutionary United Front in Sierra Leone in its fight to depose President Joseph Momoh and his successors. Prosecutors say Taylor trained in Libya with the front’s leader, Foday Sankoh.
About 500,000 people are estimated to have been victims of killings, systematic mutilation and other atrocities in the civil war that lasted from 1991 until 2002. Some of the worst crimes were carried out by gangs of child soldiers, who were given drugs to desensitise them.
In an emotional opening statement, Griffiths cast Taylor as a peacemaker who was too busy defending democracy in Liberia to “micromanage” atrocities committed by rebels in Sierra Leone.
Griffiths said Taylor was not behind the use of children in conflict. “Child soldiers were not a Charles Taylor invention,” he said.
The former president sat impassively in court wearing a brown double-breasted suit, brown tie and dark glasses.
Taylor is being tried in a courtroom rented from the international criminal court because of fears that trying him in Sierra Leone could spark renewed violence.
At the court’s headquarters in the Sierra Leone capital, Freetown, the public galleries of two courtrooms were packed with survivors, students, police and community leaders who watched a live satellite broadcast of the opening statement.
In Liberia, a civil rights advocate, Boakai Jalieba, said the case was being closely followed there.
“We in Liberia have to take keen interest in the trial because the wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone had too many similarities, they had some common identities; Liberians were recruited to go to Sierra Leone and Sierra Leoneans fought here,” he said.
Robyn Hillman-Harrigan: The Reckoning — Interview with Director Pamela Yates
The film was stark and penetrating. It discussed the worst war crimes and crimes against humanity of our time, but did so in a rational, rights based justice context.




