RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘paper’

CPT result 2009

The results of the Common Proficiency Test (Paper Pencil mode) held in June, 2009 and Common Proficiency Test (Online mode) held in March, April and May 2009 is expected to be declared on Friday, the 17th July, 2009 around 2 P.M.
The result of the Common Proficiency Test (Paper Pencil mode) will be available on the [...]

Andy Coulson faces phone-hacking inquiry

Commons media committee to quiz David Cameron’s communications chief about his role in intercept affair

Andy Coulson, the Conservative party’s communications chief, will next week be questioned by MPs about phone-hacking by News of the World journalists during his time as editor of the paper.

The Commons media committee will ask Coulson about reports in the Guardian showing that phone-hacking was much more widespread than News of the World admitted after its royal reporter, Clive Goodman, was jailed for illegally intercepting royal telephone messages.

Coulson – who resigned as the paper’s editor after Goodman was convicted – has said he did not know what his employee was doing.

But he has never been questioned in public about the affair, and at the hearing next Tuesday he is expected to come under pressure from MPs who find it hard to believe that News of the World executives did not know how Goodman was getting his information.

Coulson was the editor of the paper for three and a half years until resigning in January 2007.

In July that year, he became the Tory communications chief and is now viewed as a key member of David Cameron’s inner circle.

Last week, following the latest Guardian revelations about the News of the World, several Labour MPs, including the former deputy prime minister John Prescott, said Cameron should sack Coulson because of his background.

But the Tory leader insisted Coulson had already paid a price for mistakes that happened at the paper while he was in charge, and that his job was safe.

Coulson will be giving evidence with some of his former colleagues from News International.

The full list of witnesses has not yet been finalised, but could include Stuart Kuttner, the News of the World’s outgoing managing editor, Rebekah Wade, the former Sun editor who will become the News International chief executive by the end of the year, and Colin Myler, the current News of the World editor.

After Goodman was jailed, the News of the World said his behaviour was a one-off and that other staff at the paper did not know he was involved in phone-hacking.

Les Hinton, the executive chairman of News International at the time, told the culture committee then he “believed absolutely” that Coulson did not know what was going on.

Hinton also told the committee the paper had carried out a rigorous inquiry and that he believed Goodman was the only person on the paper who knew about the phone-hacking.

But last Thursday, the Guardian revealed the paper had paid more than £1m to Gordon Taylor, the chief executive of the Professional Footballers Assocation, and two others who complained about having their phones hacked.

At a culture committee hearing on Monday, the Guardian produced further evidence that the News of the World had been involved in illegal activity, including an email from 2005 showing that other reporters on the paper were involved in handling material obtained by phone-hacking.

Last week, after the Guardian broke the story about the Taylor payment, Coulson issued a statement saying: “This story relates to an alleged payment made after I left the News of the World two and a half years ago.

I have no knowledge whatsoever of any settlement with Gordon Taylor. The [Goodman] case was investigated thoroughly by the police and by the Press Complaints Commission.

“I took full responsibility at the time for what happened on my watch, but without my knowledge, and resigned.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



£20,000 fee could fund elderly care

• Three options unveiled to bridge huge funding gap
• Overhaul will bring an end to the postcode lottery

Radical changes to the way care for elderly people is funded were outlined yesterday in a green paper that confronts the soaring costs of looking after an increasingly old and frail population.

Elderly people could be compelled to pay up to £20,000 to insure themselves against the cost of being cared for at the end of their lives. The proposals are designed to replace a system that the government describes as unjust with one that is “fair, simple and affordable for everyone”.

The health secretary, Andy Burnham, said there was an urgent need to reform the structure of funding that forces some people to pay up to £200,000 for care, while others receive it free. At the moment, 50% of people pay more than £25,000 for their end-of-life care, while 20% pay more than £50,000.

Reform is needed because healthy life expectancy is not keeping pace with life expectancy. By 2026, there will be an estimated 1.7 million more adults requiring care and support in England.

“More of us are living longer – life expectancy is going up and advances in medical science mean that people with a disability are living longer. This is worth celebrating but does mean we need to radically change the way care is provided and paid for,” Burnham said.

The green paper stresses that there is not enough money in the system to pay for the care people will need in the future. “If we want to meet the needs of all those who require care in the future then, as a society, we are going to need to pay more for care and support. The question is where this additional money is going to come from,” it says. Three possible funding options are set out in the Shaping the Future of Care Together document, all of them conceived as national proposals, which would bring an end to the postcode lottery that sees local authorities setting out different criteria for financial support. The three options are:

• A partnership approach, which proposes that the government and the individual who needs care share the costs, with the government paying between a quarter and a third or more for people on a low income.

• An optional insurance-based model, which would also see the government paying between a quarter and a third of the costs, but would allow individuals to pay £20,000 to £25,000 to cover themselves against the remaining costs of care.

• A compulsory state insurance scheme under which everyone who can afford it pays between £17,000 and £20,000 – and receives free care in return.

Two alternative ideas were rejected: a scheme whereby everyone pays for themselves (ruled out because it would leave too many unable to afford any care), and an entirely tax-funded scheme (rejected because it places too heavy a burden on people of working age).

The government is not proposing to make new public funding available, but has proposed to end the disability living allowance for elderly people – which is not a means-tested benefit – to free up about £6.1bn that would then be returned to the budget for means-tested social care.

The threshold of £23,000 of assets beneath which individuals might receive care paid for by the state would remain at about that level, said the care services minister, Phil Hope.

Government funding and insurance payments would go only towards the cost of care, while accommodation and food would have to be met separately by individuals – stripping accommodation out of the costs of residential care homes for elderly people, which are calculated together. These costs could be deferred and charged to the individual’s estate when they die.

The green paper proposes creating a national care service, which would emphasise preventing people having to go into care homes by keeping them active and offering home rehabilitation services.

Burnham appeared to apologise for the government’s failure to launch this debate earlier.

“It is a difficult debate that raises difficult questions about funding. Politicians have flinched from this debate because it is difficult. The way that we look after our old people defines what we are as a country and I believe that we could do better,” he said.

Age Concern and Help the Aged welcomed the green paper as an attempt to fix the “broken care system”.

Michelle Mitchell, director of Help the Aged, said: “All political parties and the public must now look beyond the short-term squeeze on our national finances to agree a fairer way to pay for care.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Guardian shows MPs hacking proof

Documents produced by Nick Davies involve senior News of the World journalists in Mulcaire affair

• How the Guardian committee hearing unfolded

The Guardian today produced evidence to MPs that shows phone-hacking at the News of the World was more widespread than its owner News International had claimed.

Documents passed to the Commons culture, media and sport committee, which is investigating phone hacking, reveal that Neville Thurlbeck, the paper’s chief reporter, read transcripts of 35 hacked telephone messages between PFA chief executive Gordon Taylor and Jo Armstrong, a legal advisor at the PFA.

They were sent in an email to Glenn Mulcaire, a private investigator on the paper’s payroll, by an unnamed junior reporter on the paper on 29 June 2005. In the email, the reporter says “Hello, this is the transcript for Neville”. The committee was told by Guardian reporter Nick Davies this was Neville Thurlbeck.

Mulcaire was used by the paper’s former royal editor, Clive Goodman, who was jailed in January 2007 along with Mulcaire. Executives at the NoW’s owner, News International, have always maintained that Mulcaire and Goodman were acting alone and without the knowledge of managers or executives at the paper.

A second document is a contract between the News of the World and Glenn Mulcaire offering him a bonus of £7,000 if he worked to develop a story they were after. It includes the name of Greg Miskiw, then the paper’s assistant editor in charge of news. It used the false name of Paul Williams but was sent to Mulcaire.

MPs were also shown an invoice from an unnamed private investigator for work carried out for the News Group, which publishes NI’s tabloid titles, dating back to 1998.

Nick Davies, the Guardian reporter who wrote the story, told the committee: “It is hard to resist the conclusion that [News International] have consistently admitted only what has been dragged into the public domain and is indisputable.”

Earlier, PCC director Tim Toulmin told MPs. “People had raised eyebrows that Andy Coulson did not know what was going on. I would say – having been exposed as not knowing – he then resigned because he did not know what was going on. For that reason he resigned and paid a high price.”

The Guardian’s editor, Alan Rusbridger, said: “This is not a campaign to oust anyone, to reopen the police inquiry, for more prosecutions [or to] force anyone to resign. We have not called for any of those.”

He added that one of the key questions was whether self regulation of the press was “effective”.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000.

• If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


“Kiss-In” Held To Protest Detention Of Gay Men Outside Mormon Church

A “kiss-in” drew about 60 people sporting pink paper hearts to the sidewalk just off of LDS Church property near Main Street and South Temple Sunday to protest actions taken by church security late last week.

Unplug For Greater Productivity

Power Plug

We’ve all experienced those days when we sat down at our desk with a long list of things to do, and yet somehow hours later we realize that we haven’t done much, aside from checking our emails 5 times, spending hours at Lifehack.org, and instant messaging everyone we know.  For those days, when you can’t seem to beat the buzz, the greatest possible way you can ensure productivity is to disconnect from the electronics.

Now I’m not against the use of electronics to aid in productivity, far from.  In fact, I probably couldn’t live without my Blackberry.  But sometimes a disconnect from electronics all together will allow for a clearer mind, a mind which can become a productivity machine.

Remember paper and pens?  Well they’re making a comeback.  It turns out that when we disconnect we don’t have to fight our own minds trying to distract us.  There is no email on your Moleskine, no instant messenger on your legal pad.  No, here all we have is a blank paper waiting for you to create.  And there is something liberating about filling a page in a notebook with your own work.

Here’s a strategy that I use when my electronics fail me.  First I have a notepad on my desk labeled “Distractions.”  I write down every thought that is distracting me from my task at hand, and during my scheduled breaks I can knock out the distractions, or make notes of my next action on each.  This allows me to safe keep the ideas that come during productive moments, but allows the moment to stay productive.

Next I use an old fashion to-do list.  Generally my Blackberry serves this purpose well, but unplugging is unplugging, so I use my Moleskine for this task.  For my to-do list I take into account my energy levels, the amount of time each task will take, the lengths and times of each scheduled break, and anything else that needs to be addressed during my “analog” time.  This ensures that nothing will take me away from peak productivity.

Finally, there are a few things that you just can’t get around, as far as a digital disconnect goes.  For these tasks I use as rudimentary tools as possible.  Obviously you don’t want to hand write a large amount of text, especially if it needs to be in digital format.  So why not pick up an inexpensive netbook, disconnected from the internet, for these tasks.  Or at the very least, use a minimalistic text editor like JDarkRoom to minimize your distractions.  By keeping things as simple as possible, we allow for less distractions and more productivity.

Even if you can’t unplug completely, there are easy ways to decrease the noise and get things done:

  • Schedule the times you check your email, and limit this to 2 to 3 times per workday.
  • Take a media fast; you already know the economy isn’t doing well, how many articles do you really need to read about it?
  • turn off the music; it might be soothing, but music with lyrics tend to take our attention away from our work, and even the little distractions can kill productivity.
  • exercise the 2 call rule;  if someone calls twice consecutively, it’s probably more important than a regular call.
  • Let all other calls go to voicemail;  if you are in a position where you can call people back at scheduled times, let them know this in your voicemail greeting and stick to that schedule.
  • turn off all notifications;  alarms, instant messages, email notifications, and any other notifications that will pop up and distract you from your work.
  • Schedule unplug times;  You may require the use of a computer for your job, but you could probably get away with unplugging the ethernet for a scheduled period of time (if all else fails, act like you don’t know how it got unplugged).

Like I said, when used properly the digital world is one of the greatest tools man has available.  But this great tool can also lead to distractions that keep us from our work.  Unplug when the need arises and create those precious moments of peak productivity.  When you  find those extra hours eachday, you’ll be thankful.


Ibrahim Husain is the creator of ZenCollegeLife.com, a college blog dedicated to helping students succeed in and out of academia. He also journals his lifehack experiments at BrainVault.net. Offline Ibrahim is a fitness addict, motorcyclist, avid reader, guitarist, digital artist, adventure seeker, and so much more.

Follow him on Twitter: @IbrahimZCL


GTD Refresh, Part 4: Getting Sorted

File Folder

Last week, I talked about finally getting my projects in order. Of course, that’s not a one-time thing, but I’m not quite ready to talk about the process of bringing new projects into my lists just yet, whether “on-the-fly” or as part of my weekly review.

But getting a grip on my projects, both big (there’s a book proposal I want to write) and small (I need to find a decent dentist) is a two-step process. The first is what I described last week: identifying all my active projects and getting some next actions assigned to each of them. The other part of the process is setting myself up to actually do them.

In some cases, of course, I can just figure out what needs doing and go ahead and do it. But for the bigger projects, I need materials, and that means files.

Maintaining files is a weak area for me, not because I, like any other full-blooded productivity geek, don’t have a healthy lustful appreciation of file folders and my standard-issue GTD label-maker, but because it’s the least interesting and fussiest part of doing anything. But I’m 1800 miles from home – if I am going to get anything done in this 5-week sojourn, I don’t have any room to forget anything crucial, or for being disorganized.

I can’t think of anything less interesting than talking about putting paper in folders (except maybe actually putting paper in folders) and I’ve posted about filing before, so I won’t get into the mechanics of it all here, except to say that every project gets a folder (or sometimes a hard-bound notebook, if it will be unfolding over a long period of time) and every folder is neatly labeled. While a project is active, I’m careful to keep every scrap of paper related to it – I would rather have a little extra cleaning to do at a project’s close than find myself without something I didn’t know would be important down the line.

What I do want to talk about here is that perennial chestnut of personal productivity literature: paper vs. technology.

Now, I’m a big old geek, no getting around that. I’m the kind of guy whose as likely to have his nose stuck in his Blackberry as not, who fantasizes about new home network configurations (I’ve got two old PCs under my kitchen table waiting to be repurposed…), and who travels with not one but two laptops. I love well-designed software that does a job beautifully, and love the searchability and security of keeping important information in electronic form, preferable backed up in multiple places.

That said, I am as far from paperless as possible. My productivity system, indeed my office as a whole, is “paper-full”. For all the arguments against it – and believe me, the environmental impact alone pains me, though I try to use recycled paper whenever I can get it – I find paper is important. No paper, no productivity.

For one thing, I’m a writer. And while I am pretty comfortable letting words flow from my fingers through the keyboard to the screen, I can’t edit that way. I’m just not comfortable enough with the screen to read for any length of time at it, and especially not to do the kind of finicky re-thinking involved with a revision for publication.

But that’s just for writing. My preference for paper goes way beyond just editing and revising. And here is where, I hope, it gets interesting for GTD’ers everywhere.

There’s something very physical about GTD, or perhaps about working in general. Something about writing things down with pen or pencil on actual paper, about holding things in your hands, that acts as a trigger for action. Email, Evernote notes, tasks on online Todo lists – I find it all too easy to scroll through them, to glance at them and think “yes, that’s something that has to be done” and not actually do it.

But paper, something I hold in my hands, something I  physically manipulate… It’s as if physically interacting with my work in a material way triggers that animal part of me that feels the sun moving across the sky and knows that work must be done, and if not now, it will be too late.

So while I use all manner of virtual technological tools to get things done, in the end most things funnel to a paper file – a nice, heavy file folder stuffed with papers. I buy decorative file folders for two reasons: a) they tend to be made of sturdier stock than plain folders, thus holding up to use better, and b) they are easily differentiated one from the other, making my work just that little bit easier to get to.

When I’m ready to go to work, the folder comes out, the contents get scanned, and somehow, almost as if by magic, I get down to working. And things get done.


Dustin M. Wax is the project manager at Stepcase Lifehack. He is also the creator of The Writer’s Technology Companion, a site devoted to the tools of the writing trade. When he’s not writing, he teaches anthropology and gender studies in Las Vegas, NV. He is the author of Don’t Be Stupid: A Guide to Learning, Studying, and Succeeding at College.

Follow him on Twitter: @dwax.