During an interview with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Fox News’ Greta van Susteren slipped in a question about the rumors swirling that Chelsea Clinton is engaged to be married. Secretary Clinton quipped “Well, if that’s true I don’t k…
Posts Tagged ‘question’
David Finkle: To “Friend” or “Defriend”? That is the Question
If you ask me, one of the worst things assaulting the English language in the last few years is the transitive verb “friended.”
Clinton stlutters, coughs and chokes on China, 9/11 and Pak querries
That U.S Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at times appears and feels so politically unsure of herself in the corridors of power in Washington, was visible at this evening’s press conference at Hyderabad House after delegation level talks between the United States and India.
While for the most part, the interaction with the media went [...]
Centre committed to provide state of the art equipment to defence forces: Antony
Defence Minister A K Antony said on Monday that the Central Government is committed to provide state of the art equipment to the armed forces to meet any possible security challenge to the country.
Speaking in the Lok Sabha during Question Hour, Antony said defence procurement procedure is being simplified to expedite the process of [...]
Deepak Chopra: Can We Stop Being a Superpower, Please?
It’s been roughly twenty years since the fall of the Soviet Union, which means that the U.S. has experienced two decades of being the world’s…
Fox News Guest Makes Really Odd Face (VIDEO)
A guest on Fox News makes a very weird face before answering a question.
More on Fox News
Robert Siciliano: Fox Anchor’s Email Hacked, Leads to Identity Theft
One study found that the security of lost-password personal questions on web-based mail appears much weaker than passwords themselves.
Balochistan proof given to Singh: PM
ISLAMABAD – Terming his visit to Sharm el Sheikh and meeting with his Indian counterpart a complete success, Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani said that both India and Pakistan agreed to continue the dialogue process as it was considered the only way to resolve all the outstanding issues between the two nuclear power neighbours.
Briefing media persons on his four-day visit to Egypt where he attended NAM Summit and had a meeting with his Indian counterpart, the Prime Minister said that evidence was given to Prime Minister Singh about India’s involvement in Balochistan. “This was made part of the joint statement,” Prime Minister Gilani said.
Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani said that a whole gambut of issues, including Indian interference in Balochistan was raised during his meeting with Dr Manmohan Singh.
He said that Manmohan Singh was a statesman and there was a realization on both sides that one single issue should not make hostage the rest of the issues like poverty, hunger and disease confronting over 1.5 billion people of South Asia.
He said the Indian Prime Minister feared more Mumbai-like terrorists attacks on his country and he was asked that if India had some credible information in this regard it should be shared with PakistanÂ’s intelligence agencies and full cooperation would be extended.
He once again reiterated that the perpetrators of Mumbai attacks would be brought to justice and in this connection they had asked for some more information from India.
Prime Minister Gilani said the two sides agreed at the meeting that dialogue was the only way forward.
Replying to a question, he categorically stated that no foreign country was involved in arranging his meeting with the Indian Premier. “Whatever we are doing, we are doing in our own interest. It was Pakistan’s initiative.
Terrorism is a problem of Pakistan and we will fight it. If some country gets happy or angry, it’s their problem,”he added.
Prime Minister Gilani said that Manmohan Singh was ‘quite clear’ in the meeting and stated, “He was not scared and was ready to discuss any issue.”
“At present we have some trust deficit. If we have more interactions like these, then it will be taken care of,” the Prime Minister said.
He said, “Pak-India relations have remained shaky for the last 60 years and there is a lack of trust between the two neighbours”.
“When trust building starts, then we can say that we are not threatened,” he added.
Replying to a question about Afghan interference in Balochistan from Helmund, he said PakistanÂ’s concerns were conveyed to Afghan President Hamid Karzai during his meeting with him and he assured that the province will not be destabilized.
To a question that the Kashmir issue was left out, he said that the joint statement clearly stated that India and Pakistan would discuss all issues, including outstanding issues.
When asked if sending IDPs back to their homes was premature and to gain publicity, he said they were allowed to return only after the law enforcement agencies had cleared the areas of militants.
“It is our responsibility to give them protection…if law enforcing agencies feel the place is safe, only then we are sending them back.”
To a question if Taliban have been defeated, Prime Minister Gilani said that Pakistan was determined to root out terrorism, which was also badly affecting countryÂ’s economy.
“It is our resolve not to allow them to grow. They are destabilizing our economy.”
About the UN mission in Pakistan investigating Benazir BhuttoÂ’s assassination, he said they were here for fact-finding and he would meet the team soon.
The Prime Minister said that his party believed in politics of reconciliation, which was also the vision of late Benazir Bhutto.
He said that was why his party had supported Nawaz Sharif and they had reciprocated during the formation of the coalition government.
He said when he went to Egypt, he had the backing of the whole nation and all the political parties, whether inside or outside the Parliament.
Prior to leaving for Egypt, he added, he took all the political leadership into confidence and also discussed his visit with President Asif Ali Zardari and other state institutions.
He said that he would take the Parliament and the Federal Cabinet into confidence on his visit to Egypt.
Earlier in a written statement, the Prime Minister said during NAM Summit he called for reinforcing the normative framework for strict adherence to the principles of inter-state relations enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations.
Gilani said Pakistan believed that the core of NAMÂ’s efforts today should be the quest for sovereign equality. He said the Movement must renew its emphasis on giving full life and meaning to the immutable principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, non-aggression, non-intervention, mutual benefit, and peaceful co-existence.
“We believe durable peace in South Asia is achievable. It will be facilitated by the resolution of all outstanding disputes, including Jammu and Kashmir,” he said.
“We were successful in reinforcing the commitment Pakistan attaches to the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), its principles and objectives.”
He highlighted PakistanÂ’s perspective on issues of international peace and security as well as on global financial and economic crisis.
He garnered international support and solidarity for PakistanÂ’s efforts to address the challenges of extremism and terrorism and deepened PakistanÂ’s international reach, particularly in South Asia.
Gilani said he proposed ways for addressing the global financial and economic crisis – particularly emphasizing the need to avoid protectionism, increased market access, and comprehensively reform the international financial institutions.
The Prime Minister called for strengthening the multilateral system and for advancing interests of all states in an equitable manner.
He underlined the need for redesigning the global institutional architecture on the basis of democracy, accountability and transparency.
Gilani promoted the pacific settlement of disputes. Pakistan has already stressed the need for NAM to expeditiously evolve a mechanism for conflict resolution.
He suggested for developing a new global consensus covering arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation as well as access to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
Gilani said there was a need to pay urgent attention to the threat of climate change, including in South Asia, in view of prospects of the melting of glaciers. He also called for deepening South-South cooperation.
He highlighted the fact that PakistanÂ’s commitment to fight terrorism was in its own national interest and reaffirmed the resolve to realize Quaid-e-AzamÂ’s vision of a moderate, democratic and progressive Islamic Pakistan.
He said during the talks with his Indian counterpart, it was decided to delink action on terrorism from the composite dialogue process and these should not be bracketed.
Prime Minister Singh reiterated IndiaÂ’s interest in a stable and democratic Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
On the sidelines of the Summit, Gilani also held bilateral meetings with the leaders of Afghanistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bahrain and Jordan and with the Secretary General of United Nations.
“We reiterated Pakistan’s strong desire to comprehensively upgrade our bilateral relations with South Asian countries and to deepen regional cooperation through SAARC,” he said adding, “we assured the South Asian partners that Pakistan would continue to play an important role in the advancement of peace, security and economic development.”
Dr. Judith Rich: Knowing I Will Die Someday, How Then Shall I Live?
I know this sounds like a really “heavy” subject to be bringing up, especially now, in the middle of summer, when everybody just wants to…
Belgrade, Zagreb talk air traffic issues
Negotiations have begun in Belgrade between Serbian and Croatian experts from the transportation ministries regarding various traffic issues. However, the key question that the negotiations are expected to answer is whether Serbian national carrier Jat Airways will be able to receive a license for flying to Croatia’s coastal town of Dubrovnik, since the Croatian government conditions this with regulating relations in air travel between the two countries.
Fey and feeble
Hadley Freeman can ease your fashion pain
Why do so many female models in shoots look as if they’re desperate for the loo? Or is it just fashionable to look fey and feeble?
Francesca, London
Francesca, London, come on down! You are the lucky winner of the world famous “Best question of the month, year, century in Ask Hadley”! You, my darling, win a year’s worth of Ugg Repelling Spray, preventing anyone who is wearing, has worn, or has even considered wearing, a pair of Ugg boots from breaking through the 50-yard radius around your person. Sterling work.
So to your query, and its focus on the popular knock-kneed pose adopted by models. Of course it is fashionable to look fey and feeble, because this suggests you do not eat much, which suggests you are thin, which suggests you can fit into Chanel sample-size clothes, which is the most important thing in the universe. And even if you can’t achieve this state of nirvana, if you pose in a manner that suggests feebleness – such as, say, folding your body in a pose that insinuates your bones have crumbled due to osteoporosis – you can fool onlookers into believing you are on the cusp of collapse. Malnutrition? Oh my God, like, such a good look.
Having spoken thus, one mustn’t rule out your suggestion involving overflowing bladders. Fashion shoots take an unfeasibly long time. I’m not entirely sure why it requires 17 hours to take four pictures of a model in some clothes, but let us accept that it does. One could understand if the photographer got a little grumpy. One could also understand if he then forbade loo visits – after all, if it takes four hours for a model to put on each outfit, imagine how long it would take her to go to the loo. And those photography studios charge by the hour, you know. That chick can wait until after we shoot the Versace – dammit, they’re advertisers, so we gotta get that outfit shot. OK, the risk of a small stomach bulge caused by the holding in of excess liquid is a definite risk but, hell, that’s what airbrushing is for.
Thus, Ms Francesca, I believe you now understand the inevitability of the knock-kneed pose and are, I hope, knocking your forehead against a wall at the foolishness of your inquiry and, even more importantly, knocking your knees together.
This question is somewhat belated, but now that Michael Jackson has died, am I no longer allowed to lust after the Jackson-inspired jacket by Balmain?
Cherie, London
Mrs Blair? Is that you? If so, can I just say that I think you’d look absolutely faaaaaaaabulous in a bit o’ Balmain. According to one magazine, the label’s look is “fucked-up rock chick” and I just really think we could work with that. Give up the Carole Caplin pastels, go for the Balmain fucked-upness. You are married to a rock god, after all.
Anyway, I am touched by your sense of decorum. It far exceeds that of the 10 billion celebrities who were so eager to proclaim their kinship to Jackson via the sacred medium of Twitter after he died yet, oddly, never mentioned their friendship when the man was alive and, yes, Paris Hilton, I include you, much as it pains me to rebuke you on etiquette, oh, Emily Post of our time.
But seriously, let’s ponder this problem. This jacket is extremely fashionable – we know that. But the man who inspired it has, you may have heard, died. Fashion versus respect for the dead. Hmmm, a tricky one. I mean, yes, the man led a sad life and reducing him to a jacket in death would perhaps not be the legacy he wanted (even if he did name his child Blanket) and blah de blah – but we’re talking Balmain here! How can one not lust?
And let me throw in this other consideration: this jacket’s exaggerated shoulders make one look very thin. OK, question solved, surely. Michael, of all people, would have understood.
• Post questions to Hadley Freeman, Ask Hadley, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Email: ask.hadley@guardian.co.uk
Byron Williams: Two-Thirds or no Two-Thirds is California’s Question
Budget stalemates, IOU’s, forced furloughs for state employees, and recently defeated propositions have revived discussions, particularly by the Democrats in the California Legislature that the…
G.O.P. Senators Planning To Question Sotomayor’s Impartiality
The day before Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings were to begin, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee signaled on Sunday that they would question her ability to be impartial, based on previous statements she has made about her ba…
Jim Selman: When Do We Take Action?
According to The Economist’s report on aging, one in three Americans will be over 60 in the next 11 years. The impact of this number of older people on public spending will be unprecedented.



