RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘scheme’

Accused Romanian Phishers Extradited to U.S. to Face Charges

Two men authorities tied to a phishing scheme pleaded not guilty to charges of identity theft and bank fraud after being extradited to the United States. The phishing scheme targeted customers of well-known financial institutions, including Capital One and Citibank.
– Federal
authorities have extradited two Romanian men to the United States to face charges of
operating a phishing scheme targeting customers of several financial
institutions.
Officials
at the FBI announced Sept. 29 that Petru Bogdan Belbita, 25, of

Craiova,
Romania, and Cornel Ionut T…


Are U.S. Treasury Bond Sales a Ponzi Scheme?

I have heard at least 5 different theories by very smart people about how U.S. treasury bond sales are being faked.I do not have either the background or the inside knowledge to be able to comment on whether any of them are true.(1) PhD professor of ec…

Roubini: “When Governments Reach the Point Where They Are Borrowing to Pay the Interest on Their Borrowing They Are … Running a Ponzi Scheme”

In a new essay in Forbes, Nouriel Roubini writes:Net public debt is going to double as a share of GDP between 2008 and 2014. Even using the very optimistic forecasts of the Congressional Budget Office, which anticipate growth of around 4% over the next…

US boosts car scrappage by $2bn

Ford vehicles at a Michigan plant

The US Senate has approved a further $2bn (£1.19bn) for the car scrappage scheme after initial funds of $1bn ran out in 10 days.

Senators voted by 60 to 37 in favour of more funding for the government’s Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), dubbed the "cash for clunkers" plan.

Owners of old cars and trucks gain up to $4,500 towards a new vehicle in exchange for their old model.

Recent figures showed US car sales in July were boosted by the scheme.

‘Temporary gimmick’

"’Cash for clunkers’ has been a proven success," US President Barack Obama said after the vote.

CASH FOR CLUNKERS

  • Car owners can gain a voucher worth $3,500 for trading in a vehicle getting 18 miles per gallon or less for a new car getting at least 22 mpg
  • Car owners can gain vouchers of $4,500 for those trading in a car getting 18 mpg or less in exchange for a model that gets at least 28 mpg
  • The Car Allowance Rebate System is based on similar schemes in the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain that have boosted new car sales.

"The initial transactions are generating a more than 50% increase in fuel economy; they are generating $700 to $1,000 in annual savings for consumers in reduced gas costs alone, and they are getting the oldest, dirtiest and most air polluting trucks and SUVs off the road for good," he added.

Those backing the programme have applauded the scheme for its economic benefits and what they see as environmental benefits.

"The reality is this is a programme that has been working," said Senator Debbie Stabenow.

"Consumers believe it’s working. Small business people believe it’s working. People who make steel and aluminium and advertisers… and everyone who’s involved in the larger economic impact of the auto industry believe it is working."

But some analysts and critics say the benefits will only be temporary.

Republican Richard Shelby, of the Senate Banking Committee, said the plan had "squeezed months of normal activity" into several months.

Economist Richard Yamarone of Argus Research said: "Once these clunker rebates expire, it is over."

"Consumers are not going to keep buying cars. It is a temporary one-time gimmick, not a long-lasting tonic for the recovery."


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Clunky but effective

Why cash-for-clunkers schemes make sense right now

RARE is the policy innovation that catches on so fast. Indeed, “cash-for-clunkers”, the policy of offering a subsidy to car owners to trade in their old gas-guzzler for a new, less thirsty model, has been adopted this year by so many governments that it is tempting to conclude that it must be a bad idea—and to cheer the Republican senators who this week threatened to kill America’s version of the scheme. After all, any scheme that so many politicians agree on is almost bound to be a clunker itself. Yet given the difficult economic circumstances facing the world, the policy looks like a nice little runner.

The American scheme started out with $1 billion to pay for rebates of $3,500 or $4,500, depending on the difference in fuel efficiency between the old car and the new. It has burned through this in its first month, so on July 31st the House of Representatives voted to give it a further $2 billion before heading off to the beach. This week the Senate has to choose between voting for an identical bill or letting the scheme run out of money. Germany’s €5 billion ($7.2 billion) scrappage scheme has also proved highly popular: within two months of its start, in February, 1.2m motorists had applied, twice the expected number. …

US seeks to continue car rebates

A sign at an Oregon car-dealership saying "Cash for Clunkers"

The US House of Representatives has approved extra funding to allow the Car Allowance Rebate System to continue.

Under the scheme, Americans who trade in their old cars for more efficient models receive cash payments.

The programme was backed by $1bn (£600m) of stimulus funds, but has proved so popular that more cash is needed to keep it going.

The House has approved an extra $2bn, and the Senate is expected to vote on the matter next week.

Seeking clarity

US car-dealers have been expressing concerns that they are receiving confusing information about the programme.

Some are unsure whether they should continue advertising the cash payments in case the government is unable to honour its promises.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs has assured car-buyers that "if you were planning on going to buy a car this weekend using this program, this program continues to run."

"We are hoping for some clarity from the White House and Congress"

John McEleney
Chairman, National Automobile Dealers Association

But the administration has not made a commitment to continue the scheme beyond this weekend, so Congress is working to free up $2bn in extra funds from unused stimulus projects to extend the scheme.

"We are hoping for some clarity from the White House and Congress before the day is over," said John McEleney, chairman of the National Automobile Dealers Association.

Under the terms of the programme, which has been dubbed "Cash for Clunkers", Americans are being offered up to $4,500 if they scrap their old cars or trucks and exchange them for new, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Officials projected that $1bn would be enough to fund 250,000 transactions.

They planned for the scheme to operate until 1 November or until the money ran out, but sales volumes have been unexpectedly high, and the funding is drying up more quickly than had been predicted.

No precise sales figures are available but the Associated Press has quoted Michigan Senator Debbie Stabenow as saying that some 40,000 sales have been completed through the scheme, with dealers estimating that a further 200,000 deals are in the pipeline.

The scheme was designed to stimluate the US car industry, which has been hit badly by the global economic crisis.

Car sales for the first half of 2009 were down 35% from the same period in 2008, and observers are predicting only a slight recovery during the second half of the year. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

First Madoff Interview: Can’t Believe I Got Away with It

In his first prison interview, a buff-looking Bernie Madoff said he couldn’t believe he got away with his massive Ponzi scheme for so long.

“There were several times that I met with the SEC and thought ‘they got me,’” Madoff told Joseph Cotch…

US car scrappage scheme unveiled

Car being scrapped

The US government has unveiled details of its car scrappage scheme, aimed at persuading owners of "gas-guzzling" cars to exchange them for greener ones.

The $1bn programme, which runs until 1 November, offers vouchers worth up to $4,500 for people scrapping vehicles that do fewer than 18 miles per gallon.

They must buy a new car with a rating of at least 22 mpg or a light truck that manages at least 18 mpg.

Similar schemes in Europe have helped ailing firms sell more cars.

The carmaking industry has suffered worldwide from the economic downturn, which has pushed two of the big three US auto firms into bankruptcy protection.

Approved dealers

In order to qualify for the vouchers, car owners must visit the official Car Allowance Rebate System website (www.cars.gov) to find a list of approved dealers.

Vehicles to be traded in should be drivable, less than 25 years old and have been insured and registered to their owners for at least a year.

The replacement vehicle must be brand-new and should have a retail price of no more than $45,000.

Neither the old car nor the new one has to be US-made. The scheme covers domestic and foreign-made vehicles alike.

As the website makes clear, the stated purpose of the scheme is to promote fuel efficiency.

"Oil is a non-renewable resource and we cannot sustain our current rate of use indefinitely. Using it wisely now allows us time to find alternative technologies and fuels that will be more sustainable," it says.

However, similar schemes in other countries, notably the UK and Germany, have acted as a stimulus to the economy by boosting car sales and production.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Bristol adopts Paris-style bike scheme

On a rainy morning, few takers for country’s first citywide ride-and-go plan

It’s a miserable morning in the centre of Bristol. The rain is tipping down and only a halfwit would think of hiring a bike in this weather. So count me in.

Ride-and-go cycle schemes are a familiar part of the cityscape on mainland Europe. Barcelona, Amsterdam, Paris and Berlin all have well-established cycle networks, but somehow Britain has always rather lagged behind.

There are small local schemes in Southport, Cardiff, Hammersmith and Fulham, in London, and only yesterday Blackpool’s opened for business. But the closest we have to a whole-city scheme is in Bristol – Britain’s first designated Cycle City – where Hourbike operates with some support from the council.

The deal is straightforward. You register for a one-off fee of £10 and for that you get a code that lets you turn up to one of the cycle hubs and ride a bike. The first half-hour is free, any time over that works out at about £1 a hour (the idea is to undercut local car parking charges) and you can return the bike to any of the hubs dotted around the city.

Through the drizzle, I punch in the code, the electromagnetic lock is released and I have control of Daniel. The bikes all have names which are cuter than the cycles themselves because they are on the streets 24/7 and the idea is to make them solid and anonymous so that people don’t nick them.

So Daniel and I are ready but where to go for a test cycle? There are three other hubs in the centre and a couple more on the edge of the city near the University of the West of England, but I’ve no idea exactly where as there isn’t a map. Never mind. Andy, the street cleaner, should be able to help out. “There’s one outside the Royal Infirmary,” he says, “but I can’t say I’ve seen anyone using the bikes at either place.” Are you round this way often? “Every day”.

So I head off to hospital and soon discover another reason – apart from the weather – why no else is on a hire bike: it’s almost impossible to go anywhere in Bristol without going up a hill (I wonder if I’ll see any locals with colossal Tour de France-style muscled thighs). At the infirmary there’s a couple of bikes corralled at the hub, but still no sign of riders. Jim, a hospital technician, says he has never seen one.

There’s a bus stop next to the hub and no sign of a bus. Jo has been waiting for at least 10 minutes. Would she fancy a go on a bike? “It sounds like a good idea,” she says, “but I don’t think so.”

But it’s all downhill from here. “Maybe another time.”

I cycle round aimlessly for a while longer looking for another Hourbike but then reckon enough’s enough and tie Danny up for the day and head home.

It’s still early days. There are large parts of the city that still aren’t covered, though the bigger problem is winning punters’ hearts and minds. Tim Caswell, the managing director of Hourbike, which started the Bristol scheme earlier this year, refuses to be discouraged. “We’ve got about 300 people registered so far,” he says. “And with the help of the council we’re looking to increase the number of hubs and bikes so we’ve got most of the city covered. This is the way forward and we are committed to it.”

Getting it right is easier said than done. You can’t really pilot them by sticking a couple of bikes in the centre of town and hoping for the best, because people won’t see the point. It’s only when the full infrastructure is in place that it works. So you’ve got to be prepared to invest – and so far, especially with local government feeling the pinch, councils have tended to play safe by doing nothing.

“There’s a tendency to think there’s only one model,” said Phillip Darnton, who chairs Cycling England, an independent body set up by the government to promote pedal power. “Not everything has to be on the scale of the Paris Velib or TfL’s proposals for London. These are both large schemes aimed at significantly reducing commuter congestion: towns such as Southport, which has also just opened a cycle-hire scheme, are looking more to recreate the ambience of the seaside town, so they need something much less intensive.”

Even so, Britain does not have the best track record when it comes to promoting cycling. A bike hire scheme in Cheltenham has just closed and the London mayor, Boris Johnson, has managed to get on the wrong side of several councils with his plan to tear up several of their car parking bays to install cycle hubs and rob them of some revenue – so there’s still a lot of politicking to be done before London comes on stream.

So how come we’re so rubbish at cycle schemes and mainland Europe has been so successful? “It’s partly cultural,” said Marie, a Paris resident. “Cycling is seen as normal in France, whereas in Britain it’s often more about macho types in Lycra. But it’s also because people are less afraid of cycling in Paris because our drivers are so much better than yours.” Now there’s a thought.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Pietersen targeted by 80-mn pounds British style Ponzi scheme

England star all rounder Kevin Pietersen was targeted in an alleged 80 million pounds fraud by a British “Bernie Madoff-style” gang.
Suspected tricksters tried to get England”’’s former captain, who played in yesterday”’’s historic win to invest in a “Ponzi” scheme, which has since collapsed.
It is thought two men approached multi-millionaire Pietersen, 29, who is married [...]

Royal policeman guilty of £3m scam

Paul Page defrauded colleagues and friends to fund expensive lifestyle and keep afloat spread-betting scheme run from palace

A former Scotland Yard royal protection officer was found guilty today of a £3m property investment scam.

Paul Page, 38, defrauded colleagues, friends and others out of life savings, redundancy cash, pension payouts, retirement money and loans.

Many of his “innocent dupes”, including police officers guarding the Queen, lost five- and six-figure fortunes. Some were pushed to the brink of financial ruin by “rampant deceit”, and several saw their marriages crumble under the stress.

All thought they were investing in a thriving property development company. In fact its assets were “so much moonshine” and as real as “fairies at the bottom of the garden”, Southwark crown court was told.

Their money funded Page’s expensive lifestyle and gambling addiction, paid debts and kept afloat a spread-betting scheme which he ran from Buckingham Palace.

“The ability to inspire confidence and to sound plausible even when telling the most outlandish lies was very much Mr Page’s stock in trade,” said Douglas Day QC, prosecuting.

Page was convicted of one count of fraudulent trading between 2003 and 2006. He was cleared of making threats to kill against one of his victims.

He began working as a royal protection officer in 1998 and set up a number of sidelines, including a spread-betting venture called The Currency Club, in which up to 100 colleagues took part. When he and other officers lost more than £250,000, Page set up a fake property company, United Land and Property Development, in 2003 and persuaded his colleagues to invest hundreds of thousands of pounds.

The glossy brochure he used to lure them in was a fake. Page, who drove a Porsche and lived the life of a high-flying executive, owned none of the properties that his victims bought into. He conned 20 colleagues out of £1.3m and other victims out of a further £1.7m.

Page, who was charged after an investigation by the Met’s department of professional standards, claimed he had set up the property firm as a way of recouping losses from the spread betting for his colleagues. The jury decided he had deliberately set out to defraud his victims in order to fund his lavish lifestyle.

In a notepad found at his home, investigators found a drawing of a house, underneath which Page had written: “United Piss your savings up against the wall Ltd.”

Sergeant Adam McGregor, a royal protection colleague, lost £150,000 and had to sell his home to stave off bankruptcy. The officer persuaded his mother to invest £17,000; his brother and his girlfriend put in £20,000 and his father-in-law £30,000.

“I was totally sucked in by Paul. He is a very charismatic person,” McGregor said.

Fahim Baree, Page’s childhood friend and best man at his wedding, invested the £150,000 he had been left in his late father’s will. He was promised “significant returns”. He said he was dazzled by the fleet of luxury cars Page was driving and was keen for a share of the profits.

During the trial, Page made a string of allegations about widespread indiscipline and supervisory failures within SO14, the elite team who work – some of them armed – within the royal palaces in London, Scotland and Windsor. Many of his claims were unsubstantiated and denied but there were admissions in court to some of them.

McGregor accepted that he and others had sat on the Queen’s throne and had their pictures taken by each other as “something to tell the grandkids”.

Asked about a scheme the officers used to cover for each other so that one could have a sleep on duty, McGregor admitted he had fallen asleep on duty at Buckingham Palace. “I was on my post and unfortunately, in the middle of the night, I fell asleep,” he said.

Page alleged that armed SO14 officers used police cars to courier tens of thousands of pounds in cash between palaces while on duty. McGregor accepted he had escorted a car containing cash made from the spread betting during a refreshment break.

Page’s defence statement said the Currency Club involved 100 officers from the Met and other forces and ran for six years. He claimed that officers traded pornography and played poker on duty.

“Officers in the command are earning £50-60,000 per year with overtime for doing very little,” he said.

Scotland Yard said there had been no other disciplinary hearings in relation to the allegations and admissions made in the Page trial.

Detective Superintendent Tony Evans, head of specialist investigation at the Met’s directorate of professional standards, said he would not be making any further inquiries into the culture within the royal protection unit. He said the allegations were “historic” and “unsubstantiated”.

“I took the decision that [the allegations] would not be investigated. Following the verdict I don’t think I will revisit that decision,” Evans said.

Page will be sentenced on July 30.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Laureate backs school vetting scheme

Anthony Browne takes conciliatory line following calls to boycott school visits over police checks

New children’s laureate Anthony Browne has attempted to calm the storm that has blown up among children’s authors over a new scheme requiring them to be vetted before visiting schools.

Philip Pullman described the vetting scheme as “outrageous, demeaning and insulting” to the Guardian on Friday and said he wouldn’t be appearing in schools again because of it, while former children’s laureate Anne Fine said it was “demeaning” and “unhealthy”, also ruling out appearing in UK schools. “It’s a sledgehammer to miss a nut,” she said on Friday.

The Vetting and Barring Scheme is managed by the Independent Safeguarding Authority, which was set up in response to the 2002 Soham murders, committed by former school caretaker Ian Huntley. It kicks off this October, requiring the 11.3m people across the education, care and health industries who work with children to register – for a £64 fee – on a national database.

Authors including Michael Morpurgo, Quentin Blake and Anthony Horowitz have all hit out at the scheme, saying along with Pullman and Fine that it meant they wouldn’t be appearing in schools in the future. “All of us are constantly invited to do tours of schools abroad. If we can no longer enthuse British children about reading then I’m happy to go to more sensible places like Australia, New Zealand, America, France and Italy,” said Fine on Friday.

Pullman, talking on BBC Radio’s Today programme this morning, asked why he “should have to pay £64 to a government agency to be given a certificate saying ‘I’m not a paedophile’. It’s so ludicrous that it’s almost funny, but it’s not funny, it’s actually rather dispiriting and sinister.”

Browne, however, has taken a more sanguine approach to news of the scheme. “I feel that as writers we shouldn’t necessarily be granted an exemption,” he said. “If all people who work with children have to be vetted by the police then we shouldn’t be an exception. It seems a bit odd that we have to pay for it, though.”

Gillian Cross, author of The Demon Headmaster, agreed with Browne, telling the Bookseller that anything that could be done to stop child abuse was worth it. “I understand entirely why people are enraged about the whole child abuse suspicion frenzy, which is particularly hard on men. It is nevertheless true that many children are abused. Theirs is the real suffering, and if checking can help to prevent that, I’m not opposed to it,” Cross said.

And posting on the Bookseller’s website, children’s author Robert Muchamore wrote that accusations that the scheme was “a stealth tax, or part of some Orwellian state apparatus that puts a barrier between children and adults is absurdly over the top”.

“You pay £64, they run a criminal records check and you get a piece of paper to say that you have no prior convictions related to mistreatment of children. It isn’t a cure for child abuse, but it does create a barrier to stop past offenders working with kids. That seems perfectly reasonable to me,” he wrote, adding on Twitter that he was “irritated at another round of whinging by the usual grey-haired mafia of ‘renowned’ kids’ authors”.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



Getting Into The Top Prisons: Madoff Didn’t Get His First Choice

The federal judge overseeing the trial of Bernard Madoff said he would recommend the man who pulled off the biggest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history serve out his sentence in the Northeast. Instead, Mr. Madoff landed in a prison nearly 500 miles a…

Kevin Grandia: If there was an Oscar for Activism Powershift AU should win it

Now we’ve all seen protests and most of us have seen flash-mobs, but the former tend to come across as somewhat pushy and in-your-face, while…

Amex halts pension payments for UK

US-owned firm blames downturn as it suspends contributions to employees’ stakeholder scheme for 18 months

More than 6,000 UK staff at American Express were today contemplating a meagre retirement income after their US-owned employer told them it was suspending pension contributions for the next 18 months.

The company said payments to its occupational retirement scheme were unaffordable in the current economic downturn, though the situation would be kept under review.

Until this month American Express paid a core contribution of 3% of salary into the stakeholder scheme, with a pledge to match contributions of up to 6%.

The largely non-unionised workforce has accepted the deal, which applies to July salary payments.

Stakeholder pensions are personal retirement plans created by the government as a cheap alternative to trustee-based schemes.

Employers are under no obligation to make a contribution and have no responsibility for the success of the stockmarket-invested plans. Most have gone down in value by more than 30% over the last year, following a sharp decline in share values.

The company’s staff are based mainly in Sussex at centres in Brighton and Burgess Hill, with a headquarters in London’s Belgravia.

Much of the recent debate on pensions has focused on the affordability of guaranteed schemes, enjoyed mainly by public sector workers and older workers in the private sector. In these employers typically pay contributions worth more than 20% of salary.

Steve Webb, the Liberal Democrats’ pensions spokesman, said the company was undermining an already inadequate pension plan. “The danger is that employers are in a race to the bottom and are taking advantage of a situation that offers staff no protection.

Independent pensions consultant Ros Altmann said the choice commonly put before many employees was between cuts in pay, hours or pensions. “It is obvious that most workers, and especially younger workers, will opt to preserve their incomes,” she said.

“It’s part of a wider picture where employers have less and less involvement in pensions and individuals are left to look after their own retirement. The American Express scheme is already poorly funded and will have seen its value fall like other stockmarket-based schemes.

“It all makes for a pretty grim picture with confidence in pensions crumbling by the day,” she said.

Like other major US finance companies American Express has benefited from the taxpayer bailout to protect it from collapse. In the last quarter of 2008 its profits collapsed 79% on the same period a year before to $172m (£105m), but recovered in the first three months of 2009 to $443m.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Amex halts pension payments for UK

US-owned firm blames downturn as it suspends contributions to employees’ stakeholder scheme for 18 months

More than 6,000 UK staff at American Express were today contemplating a meagre retirement income after their US-owned employer told them it was suspending pension contributions for the next 18 months.

The company said payments to its occupational retirement scheme were unaffordable in the current economic downturn, though the situation would be kept under review.

Until this month American Express paid a core contribution of 3% of salary into the stakeholder scheme, with a pledge to match contributions of up to 6%.

The largely non-unionised workforce has accepted the deal, which applies to July salary payments.

Stakeholder pensions are personal retirement plans created by the government as a cheap alternative to trustee-based schemes.

Employers are under no obligation to make a contribution and have no responsibility for the success of the stockmarket-invested plans. Most have gone down in value by more than 30% over the last year, following a sharp decline in share values.

The company’s staff are based mainly in Sussex at centres in Brighton and Burgess Hill, with a headquarters in London’s Belgravia.

Much of the recent debate on pensions has focused on the affordability of guaranteed schemes, enjoyed mainly by public sector workers and older workers in the private sector. In these employers typically pay contributions worth more than 20% of salary.

Steve Webb, the Liberal Democrats’ pensions spokesman, said the company was undermining an already inadequate pension plan. “The danger is that employers are in a race to the bottom and are taking advantage of a situation that offers staff no protection.

Independent pensions consultant Ros Altmann said the choice commonly put before many employees was between cuts in pay, hours or pensions. “It is obvious that most workers, and especially younger workers, will opt to preserve their incomes,” she said.

“It’s part of a wider picture where employers have less and less involvement in pensions and individuals are left to look after their own retirement. The American Express scheme is already poorly funded and will have seen its value fall like other stockmarket-based schemes.

“It all makes for a pretty grim picture with confidence in pensions crumbling by the day,” she said.

Like other major US finance companies American Express has benefited from the taxpayer bailout to protect it from collapse. In the last quarter of 2008 its profits collapsed 79% on the same period a year before to $172m (£105m), but recovered in the first three months of 2009 to $443m.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Amex halts pension payments for UK

US-owned firm blames downturn as it suspends contributions to employees’ stakeholder scheme for 18 months

More than 6,000 UK staff at American Express were today contemplating a meagre retirement income after their US-owned employer told them it was suspending pension contributions for the next 18 months.

The company said payments to its occupational retirement scheme were unaffordable in the current economic downturn, though the situation would be kept under review.

Until this month American Express paid a core contribution of 3% of salary into the stakeholder scheme, with a pledge to match contributions of up to 6%.

The largely non-unionised workforce has accepted the deal, which applies to July salary payments.

Stakeholder pensions are personal retirement plans created by the government as a cheap alternative to trustee-based schemes.

Employers are under no obligation to make a contribution and have no responsibility for the success of the stockmarket-invested plans. Most have gone down in value by more than 30% over the last year, following a sharp decline in share values.

The company’s staff are based mainly in Sussex at centres in Brighton and Burgess Hill, with a headquarters in London’s Belgravia.

Much of the recent debate on pensions has focused on the affordability of guaranteed schemes, enjoyed mainly by public sector workers and older workers in the private sector. In these employers typically pay contributions worth more than 20% of salary.

Steve Webb, the Liberal Democrats’ pensions spokesman, said the company was undermining an already inadequate pension plan. “The danger is that employers are in a race to the bottom and are taking advantage of a situation that offers staff no protection.

Independent pensions consultant Ros Altmann said the choice commonly put before many employees was between cuts in pay, hours or pensions. “It is obvious that most workers, and especially younger workers, will opt to preserve their incomes,” she said.

“It’s part of a wider picture where employers have less and less involvement in pensions and individuals are left to look after their own retirement. The American Express scheme is already poorly funded and will have seen its value fall like other stockmarket-based schemes.

“It all makes for a pretty grim picture with confidence in pensions crumbling by the day,” she said.

Like other major US finance companies American Express has benefited from the taxpayer bailout to protect it from collapse. In the last quarter of 2008 its profits collapsed 79% on the same period a year before to $172m (£105m), but recovered in the first three months of 2009 to $443m.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Central village electrification project to be reviewed

Power Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde on Monday said that a three-tier committee has been constituted to monitor the implementation of the Rajiv Gandhi Viddyuti Karan Yojana to provide electricity to Below Poverty Line (BPL) families.
Replying to supplementaries in the Rajya Sabha, Shinde said that more than 62,000 villages have already been electrified under this scheme.
Shinde [...]

Authors revolt against school checks

Philip Pullman condemns ‘outrageous, demeaning’ scheme, and says it will stop him going into schools

Philip Pullman has led a chorus of protest from prominent children’s authors over a new scheme that will require them to be vetted before they can visit schools. He called the plans “outrageous, demeaning and insulting” and said he wouldn’t be appearing in schools again because of it.

Set up in response to the murders of Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells by school caretaker Ian Huntley in 2002, the Independent Safeguarding Authority will vet all individuals who work with children from October this year, requiring them to register with a national database for a fee of £64. Pullman compared the scheme to the notorious piece of legislation section 28, which banned the “promotion” of homosexuality in schools and for which David Cameron offered a public apology last week.

“It seems to be fuelled by the same combination of prurience, sexual fear and cold political calculation,” the author of the bestselling His Dark Materials trilogy said today. “When you go into a school as an author or an illustrator you talk to a class at a time or else to the whole school. How on earth – how on earth – how in the world is anybody going to rape or assault a child in those circumstances? It’s preposterous.”

The Carnegie medal-winning author and screenwriter Frank Cottrell Boyce agreed with Pullman. “As an author you’re never alone with a class,” he said. “There’s no possible reason for this, unless it’s a revenue-raising scam.”

Both Pullman and former children’s laureate Anne Fine said the legislation would mean that they would not speak in a school again. “I refuse – having spoken in schools without incident for 32 years, I refuse to undergo such a demeaning process,” said Fine. “It’s all part of a very unhealthy situation that we’ve got ourselves into where all people who are close to children are almost seen as potential paedophiles.”

“If someone says we won’t have you in our school, of course I’m not going to,” agreed Pullman. “It’d be a great shame for me but I’m not going to under these circumstances. I went into a primary school in Oxford earlier this year and thoroughly enjoyed it. It’s a very enjoyable thing I can do occasionally – I don’t have to do it very often because fortunately I can earn enough from my writing. But other authors depend on the income it brings in. For them the crowning insult is to have to pay to clear their name from something they haven’t done.” He believes the legislation will also have a longer-term effect. “It damages in a much deeper way the trust and social cohesion we ought to be able to rely on,” he said. “You ought to be able to trust people, so to say to a child that you’re having someone to talk to you but don’t worry, we’ve checked him out and he’s not a paedophile, implies that everybody who isn’t checked is.”

Children’s author Adele Geras called the scheme “lunatic”. “They ought to be able to refine this legislation to make exceptions for people who see huge groups together,” she said. “One is never alone with a single child – one is never alone with a vast number of children. The smallest number would be 32, and there are always two to three teachers.”

But Geras said she would be prepared to register and pay the £64 in order to continue speaking in schools. “I would love to take a principled stand but I enjoy doing it,” she said. “And there are an awful lot of people who’ll feel more strongly that I do who can’t afford to take a principled stand because school visits will be the bread and butter of their work.” She suggested that the money being spent on establishing the scheme should instead be used to buy some more books for schools.

A statement from the Home Office confirmed that the ISA scheme would apply to authors visiting schools, but made no comment on the authors’ concerns.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds