RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘shadow chancellor’

UK GDP falls faster than expected

• GDP down 0.8% in threee months to June
• City had expected a 0.3% decline, with some expecting growth

The chancellor’s forecasts for economic growth were blown out of the water official figures revealed Britain’s economy contracted by a record 5.6% over the last year as output fell for a fifth straight quarter.

Dashing hopes that the steepest decline in growth since the 1930s might be nearing an end, the Office for National Statistics said gross domestic product – the total value of goods and services in the economy – fell by 0.8% in the three months to June. The size of the drop surprised the City, which had expected only a 0.3% decline following recent signs of a pickup in the housing market and strong growth in high street spending.

But although the news caused the pound to fall 0.5% against the dollar to $1.64, the FTSE 100 saw its 10th straight day of gains, ending up 16.8 points, or 0.4%, at 4,577.

Economists believe GDP will almost certainly contract by more than the Treasury’s forecast of between –3.25% and –3.75% this year.

“It would be a miracle [if the government's target was met],” said Colin Ellis, European economist at Daiwa Securities SMBC. “Not on the scale of water into wine but not far off.”

The economy has already contracted by 3.16% this year and analysts are predicting a drop of 4.5% for 2009 as a whole.

Hetal Mehta, senior economic adviser to the Ernst & Young Item Club, said the economy would have to grow by 1% in the third quarter of the year and by 1.8% in the final three months to meet the government’s target of –3.75%.

The Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, Vince Cable, said: “These figures blow a hole in the chancellor’s GDP forecast for this year. The government’s failure to address the crisis in bank lending is only making the economic outlook worse. As a result, the deficit will balloon further, leading to bigger spending cuts or higher taxes.” The shadow chancellor, George Osborne, said: “These disappointing figures are much worse than expected and show that the recession is longer and deeper than the government had led us to believe. The sad news is this will mean the rise in unemployment is likely to be even steeper.”

Before yesterday’s data, some economists had even predicted the UK could post its first positive growth since early 2008, and the size of the decline prompted immediate speculation that the Bank of England would be forced into fresh emergency action to kickstart activity.

While the pace of decline in GDP slowed from the 2.4% seen in the first three months of 2009, the economy has suffered a cumulative contraction of 5.7% in the last five quarters.

The ONS said this was double the drop in the recession of the early 1990s and almost as big as the 6.4% retrenchment during the 1980-81 slump. The 5.6% drop in GDP in a year has not been matched since comparable records began in 1955.

Business services and finances, a sector that has boomed for much of the last decade, accounted for more than a quarter of the GDP decline in the second quarter. Overall, services fell by 0.6% on the quarter and by 3.8% on the year.

Describing the figures as “shockingly bad” Vicky Redwood, UK economist at Capital Economics, said they “firmly dash any hopes that the UK had already pulled out of recession”. Getting the economy back on track “looks likely to be a long hard slog”, she said.

The TUC’s general secretary, Brendan Barber, said: “There are no green shoots here. Unemployment is growing and a recovery that brings hope to the jobless looks ever more distant.

“Immediate big spending cuts are the last thing we need. They could tip the economy into an ever deeper downturn and make the deficit worse when the tax take falls and spending on unemployment goes up.”

Meanwhile, US consumer confidence fell this month to its lowest level since April amid growing pessimism about the long-term economic outlook, especially about income and jobs.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Cameron unveils plan to scrap FSA

Tory leader says the tripartite system for City regulation introduced by Gordon Brown was directly to blame for the crisis facing the country

David Cameron today accused the government of a “policy failure of historic proportions” as he unveiled plans to abolish the Financial Services Authority and divide its responsibilities between a beefed-up Bank of England and a new consumer protection body.

In a speech in London, the Conservative leader said the tripartite system for City regulation introduced by Gordon Brown was directly to blame for the crisis facing the country.

He dismissed the government’s proposed reforms as inadequate measures that jeopardise recovery, promising instead to give sweeping new powers to the Bank of England.

Under Conservative proposals, the Bank would regulate City pay structures, risk-taking and the size of financial institutions, while the rest of the FSA’s functions would be performed by a new Consumer Protection Agency (CPA).

The government plans to keep the “tripartite” system – involving the Bank, the FSA and the Treasury – but introduce an overseeing Council for Financial Stability.

Launching a Conservative white paper on banking alongside George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, Cameron said: “The decisions that led to this crisis represent a policy failure of historic proportions. We now need deep, wide-ranging reform that matches both the magnitude of the crisis and the scale of the hardship inflicted on the British people.

“That reform must be based on a clear understanding of what went wrong in the first place and a clear determination to put it right.”

The debt crisis had been “at best ignored and at worst encouraged”, he said.

“For this, I believe the finger of blame points directly at the system of financial regulation established by Gordon Brown in 1997.

“At its heart was the tripartite system; a system in which no-one was looking at the big picture, no-one had responsibility and authority to act and no-one was effectively in charge.

“So those bad debts, those risky loans, the soaring house prices, the systemic risk, the asset price bubble – they all fell between the cracks of the system.

“I’m afraid the government’s proposals that all we need are a few more tweaks and a little bureaucratic tinkering are totally inadequate and risk preventing a recovery.”

Under the Tory plans, bank and credit card customers would also have the right to receive a “data file” about the payments they make, allowing them to find out easily online whether rival companies offer cheaper services.

This proposal is based on an idea being pursued by Barack Obama’s administration. The Tories believe that current price comparison websites are flawed because customers cannot compare price information in a way that takes into account their personal spending behaviour.

The Tories are also proposing a review of the competition implications of the Lloyds/HBOS merger and insist that high street banks that engage in high-risk investment banking should pay a penalty in the form of “much higher capital requirements”.

They are in principle attracted by the idea of separating investment banking from retail banking – the so-called Glass-Steagall option, after the act once used to enforce this split in the US – but think this would only work if new regulation was agreed internationally.

Other proposals in the Tory white paper include:

• The creation of a financial regulation division at the Bank of England, overseen by a new financial policy committee that would work alongside the monetary policy committee. There would also be a new deputy governor for financial regulation.

• Higher salaries for City regulators, funded by an increase in the industry levy used to subsidise the FSA. City firms would have to second staff to the Bank of England to provide the regulators with better access to market experience.

• The Bank of England using capital requirements to impose a “tax” on risky bonus structures.

• The appointment of a Treasury minister, who would be based largely in Brussels, with specific responsibility for European financial regulation.

Lord Myners, the Treasury minister, condemned the Tory plans. “These proposals are window dressing that ignore the failures that led to the global financial crisis,” he said.

“While George Osborne talks about who’s in charge, we are focused on the lessons of the crisis, including greater scrutiny of the shadow banking sector and a crackdown on excessive city bonuses.

“The Tory proposals would abolish an independent, expert regulator, while diverting attention from banks that took excessive risks that led to this crisis.”

And Liam Byrne, the chief secretary to the Treasury, also criticised the Tories.

“David Cameron and George Osborne can talk all they like about banking reform, but when it mattered, they showed their inexperience and called it wrong,” Byrne said.

“They opposed the government’s action to protect Northern Rock irrespective of the risks to savers and the wider economy.

“Since that misjudgment, they haven’t learned their lesson. They’re the only politicians in the developed world who think that it’s a good idea to cut back spending in the middle of a recession, and deny the economy the boost it needs to get Britain out of the downturn.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Oleg Deripaska ‘may quit Britain’

By Tim Whewell
BBC Newsnight reporter

Oleg Deripaska

Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska has told the BBC he is considering breaking his connection with Britain.

"I’m not sure I will have any links with Britain in the future," he said in an exclusive interview with Newsnight.

The possible move follows the collapse of a Birmingham-based van firm Mr Deripaska once owned.

Last summer then EU trade commissioner Lord Mandelson and shadow chancellor George Osborne were involved in controversy after a party on his yacht.

Mr Deripaska was speaking as he took me on a personally-guided tour of his Russian industrial empire – the most extensive the publicity-shy tycoon has ever given a journalist.

One of Russia’s richest men, Mr Deripaska still owns a house bought for an estimated £25m ($40m) on one of London’s most exclusive squares.

"I wasn’t considering in those days whether they were British politicians. It was my summer holiday"

Oleg Deripaska on the "yachtgate" scandal

He said firmly that he still regards Lord Mandelson, now the business secretary, as his friend.

And he described their relationship as "good", asking: "Why should it have changed"

But he also told me: "I don’t understand your country.

"You have a lot of achievements, but at the moment you are in a kind of fire.

"You need to change so many things you inherited from the post-industrial economy – I just can’t see any benefit in what the media are doing with your politicians right now."

‘A good dinner’

He is particularly annoyed at the reporting of the party last summer including Lord Mandelson and the shadow chancellor, Mr Osborne, when his 72-metre yacht, the Queen K, was moored off Corfu.

Mr Deripaska said: "I wasn’t considering in those days whether they were British politicians. It was my summer holiday."

The Queen K yacht

"We had a good dinner, there were many people and I’m surprised they picked on these poor guys and screwed them in the press," he added.

The scandal erupted because Mr Deripaska controls most of Russia’s aluminium – and Lord Mandelson then oversaw EU metal tariffs.

I asked Mr Deripaska if he ever benefited from their relationship.

"Benefited from friendship" he asked indignantly. "It’s not my business. Whatever I did in my life, I did myself."

Lord Mandelson has already denied he did "any favours" for Mr Deripaska – and the EU commission has said a 2005 decision to remove punitive import tariffs on aluminium foil, that appeared to benefit Mr Deripaska’s company Rusal, was taken without Lord Mandelson’s personal intervention.

After the meeting in Corfu, George Osborne was accused by Mr Deripaska’s friend – the banker Nathaniel Rothschild, who was at also at the party, of having used the occasion to solicit a donation to the Conservative Party – a claim he has strongly denied.

Disappointment with Britain

Speaking about the allegations for the first time, Mr Deripaska said: "I tried to stay away from Russian politicians – why should I move towards British politicians

"I can’t see that anyone from Britain would ask me – it’s unbelievable."

George Osborne and Peter Mandelson

He says he has not been in Britain for more than a year and does not currently hold a British visa.

His disappointment with the country is fuelled partly by the failure to save LDV, the British van-maker he owned, from bankruptcy.

As the recession bit, his car company, GAZ, stopped funding the loss-making LDV and backed a management buy-out bid.

But hopes that the government might support the project with a substantial cash injection came to nothing.

After "yachtgate", did Mr Mandelson keep the Russian tycoon’s interests all the more firmly at arm’s length

It was Ian Pearson, the junior business minister, who spoke for the government on LDV, while his boss remained silent.

Perhaps, I suggested to Mr Deripaska, one reason LDV was not rescued was that politicians now feel they have to be over-careful in dealing with him.

"I know what the minimum level of life is – and anything extra looks like paradise"

Oleg Deripaska

"In this sense, it would be so wrong for the country," he answered.

"You have a good company, good people and complex manufacturing.

"There are only a few left in Britain — engineering companies that can support production — and based on a wrong press, someone could push them out of business. Why"

When pressed on whether the government should have bailed LDV out, he said simply: "It’s their decision – I can’t judge."

Disputed figures

For now, Mr Deripaska has wider problems than Britain.

According to Forbes magazine, his fortune has shrunk over the last year from £28bn to just £3.5bn.

Mr Deripaska disputes those figures, saying he was never as rich as has been claimed.

Oleg Deripaska

He said: "Whoever counted, it was based on assets only, in the most positive scenario."

He says he doesn’t know how much money he has, but he admits he took risks as his company, Basic Element, has diversified into more and more sectors including metals, cars, construction, aviation, financial services, and energy.

It has depended partly on huge foreign bank loans which he is now attempting to restructure.

"If you want to grow at 2-3% a year it’s not a problem," he said. "But if you want to grow 15-20% a year it’s a risk, it’s a ride on a wild horse."

He says he likes horses – and then laughs. He is disarmingly charming – at 41, boyish not only in his looks, but also in energy and enthusiasms.

Expanding into nuclear

As we toured the assembly line at the GAZ plant at Nizhny Novgorod – the most automated, he says, in the country – he told me he is convinced his new Russian car, the Volga Syber, will be a best-seller when the economy picks up.

Later, as we took a helicopter trip over the Sayan Mountains of southern Siberia, near his aluminium smelter, he talked of expanding into other metals – and even of building nuclear power stations.

And where does his determination come from

Mr Putin driving a 1956 Volga

He doesn’t like talking about his childhood, a time without luxuries, his father dead and his mother often absent.

But eventually he said: "I was raised in a small village.

"I know what the minimum level of life is – and anything extra looks like paradise."

He laughed. "That’s why I prefer not to count problems, but just think about what may be in the future."

Newsnight featuring the interview with Oleg Deripaska is at 2230 BST on Tuesday 14 July 2009 on BBC Two.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.