RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘US economy’

Microsoft profits plunge again

• Company’s shares drop more than 7%
• Profits for last three months fall 29% on last quarter

Microsoft shocked investors yesterday by announcing another plunge in revenues and profits, sending the group’s shares tumbling and leaving some analysts questioning the technology giant’s prospects.

In its latest quarterly financial results, the world’s biggest software company announced revenues of $13.1bn, down from almost $16bn over the same period last year. Profits for the last three months fell 29% to $3.05bn, down from $4.3bn for the fourth quarter of 2008.

While some of the drop could be attributed to customers waiting for the arrival of Windows 7 – due to go on sale this autumn – the company has also been struck by the tightening of the economy and a general slowdown in PC sales.

Until the previous quarter, the company had never experienced negative growth since going public 23 years ago.

The company’s chief financial officer, Chris Liddell, said: “Our business continued to be negatively impact by weakness in the global PC and server markets. In light of that environment, it was an excellent achievement to deliver over $750m of operational savings.”

Microsoft said it had made the savings through streamlining operations and cutting thousands of jobs, but admitted that it had spent large amounts on legal costs and redundancy packages. Legal charges totalled $193m, while the company also counted $108m in impairments and $40m in additional severance charges.

The results were lower than Wall Street analysts expected, with consensus guidance hovering at around revenues of $14.3bn – and shares dropped more than 7% in after-hours trading as a result.

“It’s a real disappointment … a significant miss,” said Brendan Barnicle, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities.

Not everyone was depressed by the company’s prospects, however. Katherine Egbert of Jefferies & Co said that although results were “tepid” there were “some green shoots”.

Among those prospects is Windows 7, the latest version of the company’s operating system. With PC sales underperforming, Microsoft is desperate for software to be a hit – particularly since the 2007 launch of its predecessor, Windows Vista, proved so difficult. That much-heralded product launch suffered problems, after customers discovered that many pieces of hardware would not work.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Ford profits from debt restructuring

• Ford still has $21bn in the bank
• Carmaker aims to break even in 2011
• Firm may have benefited from fears over Chrysler and GM

The US carmaker Ford offered a chink of light in the gloom engulfing Detroit by delivering a quarterly profit of $2.26bn (£1.37bn), though the gain was entirely down to a one-off financial boost from a debt restructuring which offset losses on the sale of vehicles.

Ford’s market share of crucial US vehicle sales rose by two percentage points to 16.4% as its rivals, General Motors and Chrysler, struggled their way through bankruptcy. But the company still lost just over $1bn on its core business of selling cars and trucks.

The firm, the second-largest American carmaker after GM, is the only one of Detroit’s “Big Three” to have refused any state aid. Chief executive Alan Mulally, conceded that conditions remain tough. “While the business environment remained extremely challenging around the world, we made significant progress on our transformation plan,” he said.

Through a series of transactions to reduce debt by swapping loans for shares, Ford made an exceptional gain of $2.7bn. The company burnt through $1bn of cash in the second quarter, but still has $21bn in the bank and reiterated its goal of breaking even in 2011. Anecdotal evidence has suggested that some US motorists turned to Ford to avoid cash-strapped companies because of concern that warranties could be compromised at Chrysler and GM.

In Europe, Ford’s profits fell from $582m to $138m despite the popularity of a new version of the Fiesta, which has racked up sales of 300,000 since its introduction in the autumn making it Europe’s second-best-selling car. The Fiesta and the Focus are soon to be introduced to the US as Ford tries to satisfy demand among American motorists for smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Analysts believe Ford has sufficient firepower to maintain its standalone stance. In a recent research note, Eric Selle, a debt analyst at JP Morgan, said: “We believe Ford has the liquidity to make it to 2010, when its cash burn should improve.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Ford profits from debt restructuring

• Ford still has $21bn in the bank
• Carmaker aims to break even in 2011
• Firm may have benefited from fears over Chrysler and GM

The US carmaker Ford offered a chink of light in the gloom engulfing Detroit by delivering a quarterly profit of $2.26bn (£1.37bn), although the gain was entirely down to a one-off financial boost from a debt restructuring which offset losses on the sale of vehicles.

Ford’s market share of crucial US vehicle sales rose by two percentage points to 16.4% as its rivals, General Motors and Chrysler, struggled their way through bankruptcy. But the company still lost just over $1bn on its core business of selling cars and trucks.

The firm, which is the second largest US carmaker behind GM, is the only one of Detroit’s “Big Three” to have refused any state aid. Ford’s chief executive, Alan Mulally, conceded that conditions remain tough. “While the business environment remained extremely challenging around the world, we made significant progress on our transformation plan‚” he said.

Through a series of transactions to reduce debt by swapping loans for shares, Ford made an exceptional gain of $2.7bn. The company burnt through $1bn of cash in the second quarter but still has $21bn in the bank and it reiterated its goal of breaking even in 2011.

Anecdotal evidence has suggested that some US motorists turned to Ford to avoid cash-strapped companies because of concern that warranties could be compromised at Chrysler and GM.

In Europe, Ford’s profits fell from $582m to $138m, despite the popularity of a new version of the Fiesta, which has racked up sales of 300,000 since its introduction in the autumn, making it Europe’s second-best-selling car. The Fiesta and the Focus are soon to be introduced to the US as Ford tries to satisfy demand among American motorists for smaller, more fuel-efficient, vehicles.

Analysts believe Ford has sufficient firepower to maintain its standalone stance. In a recent research note, Eric Selle, a debt analyst at JP Morgan, said: “We believe Ford has the liquidity to make it to 2010, when its cash burn should improve.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Morgan Stanley plans $4bn bonuses

Morgan Stanley is setting aside a huge sum to pay out bonuses despite posting its third consecutive quarterly loss and admitting it is disappointed with key departments.

The US bank’s latest results show it is allocating $3.9bn (£2.36bn) for paying out to staff, 72% of its net revenues. That dwarfs the percentage of revenue set aside by arch rival Goldman Sachs, where workers are on track for large bonuses after record results last week.

Morgan Stanley extinguished the tentative flames of optimism among US banks today when it posted a loss of $159m for April to June and said it was not satisfied with its performance in fixed income trading and in asset management.

News of the bank’s loss unsettled traders on Wall Street, whose view of the banking sector’s prospects was brightened last week by Goldman’s surge in profits and further upbeat news from JP Morgan, Citigroup and Bank of America.

Goldman said last week that it was dedicating 49% of its revenue to paying its staff, amounting to a compensation fund of $6.65bn.

Further reading of Morgan Stanley’s results showed its compensation pot was not only much bigger as a percentage of net revenues of $5.4bn, but that it had jumped 26% from $3.1bn a year ago.

“It was a very good quarter to be a Morgan Stanley employee,” said analyst Brad Hintz at Sanford C Bernstein & Co. “I’m not so sure it was so good to be a Morgan Stanley shareholder.”

Although big bonuses to bankers are arousing controversy in the wake of the credit crunch, bumper payouts seem here to stay as firms continue to battle to attract the most talented staff.

The hefty bonus pot at Morgan Stanley echoes its comments that it needs to woo more top performers to its trading floors.

John Mack, chairman and chief executive, said that it was one way the loss-making bank was “taking steps to deliver better results” in its underperforming departments.

“These initiatives include hiring to add key trading and investment management talent,” he said.

The bank was hit in the latest quarter by a charge related to repaying government loans known as Tarp. The disappointing performance from Morgan Stanley was accompanied by downbeat news from San Francisco-based Wells Fargo and tempered optimism about a recovery in the financial sector.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


US economy improving – Bernanke

Bernanke said the Federal Reserve had an array of weapons at its disposal to withdraw its unprecedented monetary stimulus when the time was right

The state of the US economy appears to be improving and the Federal Reserve is reviewing ways to withdraw its massive monetary policy stimulus when the time is right, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke said today.

Appearing before the House financial services committee for his report on monetary policy, Bernanke said: “The pace of decline appears to have slowed significantly, and final demand and production have shown tentative signs of stabilization.”

However, he cautioned that unemployment was likely to remain high into 2011, and said that this could damage already fragile consumer confidence and potentially undermine what is expected to be a very gradual recovery.

Bernanke said the Federal Reserve had an array of weapons at its disposal to withdraw its unprecedented monetary stimulus when the time was right, even if its balance sheet remained large for a time.

“We also believe that it is important to assure the public and the markets that the extraordinary policy measures we have taken in response to the financial crisis and the recession can be withdrawn in a smooth and timely manner as needed, thereby avoiding the risk that policy stimulus could lead to a future rise in inflation,” he said.

John Higgins, senior market economist at consultants Capital Economics, said: “The Fed is confident that it has ‘the necessary tools to withdraw policy accommodation, when that becomes appropriate, in a smooth and timely manner’ and so ‘prevent the emergence of an inflation problem further down the road’. Presumably there is nothing that Bernanke could ever say to convince the more naive monetarists, gold bugs and conspiracy theorists that a surge in inflation is inevitable.

“But while we are not blind to the risk that the Fed could misjudge the timing (in either direction), in principle at least the exit strategy should be much more straightforward and less disruptive than many assume.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Goldman Sachs set for big bonuses

• Investment bank delivers profits of $3.44bn
• Big bonuses likely to be paid to 29,400 Goldman Sachs staff

The investment bank Goldman Sachs delivered a clear signal that the good times are returning on Wall Street by milking a recovery in financial markets to generate profits of $3.44bn (£2.12bn), raising the prospect of average pay packages of as much as $900,000 for its employees.

Goldman’s second-quarter earnings, which amounted to $38m per day, were up 65% on 2008 and confirmed the US bank’s status as one of the stand-out winners from the credit crunch which paralysed the financial industry for much of last year.

The firm’s revenue of $13.76bn was the highest in its 140-year history. Its success on the trading floor is likely to translate into record bonuses, to the dismay of critics who view runaway compensation as a key factor contributing to the global economic meltdown.

Goldman’s chief financial officer, David Viniar, put the bank’s higher profits down to “basic blocking and tackling”. Speaking on a conference call, Viniar said Goldman had done “very well” in its core operation trading stocks, shares, debt and other financial products: “It was very widespread, day after day, client-facing business in very liquid markets and very liquid products.”

The bank’s trading and principal investments division saw revenue almost doubled with a 93% leap to $10.78bn. This easily offset a drop in income from Goldman’s financial advisory arm, which was hampered by a dearth in corporate takeovers.

Viniar said the bank had a “very, very strong culture of risk management” and had secured loyalty from its clients: “At the depths of the crisis, we were there trying to provide them with liquidity and with the services they wanted.”

During the quarter, Goldman dedicated 49% of its revenue to paying its staff – amounting to a compensation fund of $6.65bn, or $226,000 for each of its 29,200 staff. If the bank’s bottom line prospers to the same degree for the rest of the year, employees could end up with average annual pay of more than $900,000 – an increase of nearly 150% on last year’s figure of $363,000.

Such payouts have aroused huge controversy. In London, where Goldman employs 5,500 staff, some 38 MPs have signed an early day motion noting the prospect of the bank’s bonuses “with concern” and calling on the government to intervene over vast payouts in the financial industry.

The Liberal Democrat treasury spokesman, Vince Cable, accused Goldman executives of having short memories: “In ten months, they’ve gone from taking a begging bowl to the US government to paying out massive bonuses. If we are to have stability in the finance sector, we must see pay restraint in all banks, irrespective of which country they are based in.”

Goldman’s success has generated its fair share of detractors. Critics point out that the bank was the biggest counterparty in financial insurance policies to the insurer AIG and that its collateral calls contributed to the US company’s collapse, requiring AIG to seek $150bn of government aid.

Furthermore, Goldman itself received $10bn from the US government’s troubled asset relief fund, which it paid back last month to avoid any further caps on dividends or remuneration. The firm converted to a ‘bank holding company’ last year, allowing it to take retail deposits, as the business model of a standalone Wall Street bank came under threat.

A leading US labour organisation, the Service Employees International Union, said Goldman’s pay practices are a strong argument for root and branch change in Wall Street’s compensation policy to end a culture of rewarding bankers for taking risks.

Stephen Lerner, director of the SEIU’s financial reform campaign said: “They have some kind of moral and economic amnesia. After we bail them out with tens of billions in taxpayers’ funds, they go back to exactly the same practices as before.”

Defending the bank’s compensation practices, Viniar said Goldman had a long established “pay for performance” policy and pointed out that staff saw a sharp drop in payouts when times were tougher in 2008. But he said: “If we do perform well, our employees will be rewarded appropriately.”

Analysts say that Wall Street trading houses face less vibrant competition after the demise of rivals such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, making it slightly easier to gain a financial edge. Gerard Cassidy, a banking analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said Goldman’s brand, viewed as trustworthy, and its ability to attract top talent contribute to the firm’s success.

“The economy’s not out of the woods yet but I would say the dark days of Wall Street are behind,” said Cassidy. “In the first quarter, we saw the first rays of sunshine.This quarter, we’ve got confirmation that the sun is shining brighter and that it will continue to do so as the economy recovers.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Broke California poised to shut parks

• Public may lose access to 80% of nature reserves
• State’s plan digs deeper financial hole, say critics

It is hard to envisage a no-entry sign tagged to a towering redwood tree. But the recession – writ on an epic scale in California’s proposal to close 220 state parks – is forcing the American public to confront the closure of the great outdoors.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, California’s governor, is trying to make up a $26bn (£16bn) budget shortfall, and has suggested that California can no longer afford to run its parks.

Conservationists are meanwhile arguing that California cannot afford not to. And this week the federal government appeared to partly agree, with the National Parks Service threatening to seize some of the sites if Schwarzenegger goes ahead with the closures.

The proposed shutdown of the parks would affect 80% of California’s nature reserves, historic sites and recreation areas, and restrict access to 30% of the state’s coastline. Affected areas would stretch from the mountains of the Sierra Nevadas to the beaches and wetlands of Big Sur, and to the deserts of San Diego, where some of the last peninsular bighorn sheep roam.

California is not alone. The crisis has also exposed hitherto hidden casualties of the economic downturn, with states from Oregon to Illinois, and New York to Tennessee, struggling to stretch resources.

Other states have proposed budgets that would put closed signs on parks and historic sites, though none so far has adopted measures as extreme as those being put forward in California.

Pennsylvania presented a budget proposal last month that would shut 35 of its 117 state parks. Several states have been forced to scale back opening hours and services, and dismiss rangers, faced with cuts to budgets – ranging from 39% in Georgia to 57% in Idaho.

The federal government does not have the resources to save more than a handful of California’s parks, let alone all of those across the US. Nonetheless, the National Parks Service issued a letter warning Schwarzenegger that it would use protection clauses under the original land deeds to the states, so as to take control of six parks in the San Francisco area, the dunes around the Big Sur and elsewhere.

“We really are just looking for ways we can keep those places open,” said David Siegenthaler, the National Parks Service’s manager for the state of California. “In these economic times it is probably even more important that people have access to good places.”

Conservationists believe parks can withstand a year or so of closure without lasting harm. But fewer ranger stations will mean increased risk of vandalism, and less maintenance will lead to environmental degradation.

“If it is a year or two I don’t think the damage will be a long lasting situation,” said Philip McKnelly, director of the National Association of State Park Directors. “But ultimately it is going to show as damage to resources.”

A survey of state park directors in mid-May suggested most states had cut spending on parks by 15% in their 2008 budgets, and were considering steeper cuts in the next fiscal year, which started on 1 July for many. In California, the loss will be immediate, conservationists say, putting some of the state’s most visited sites off-limits.

Critics also fear the closures could be irreversible. “Once those places are closed it becomes very difficult to re-open them,” said Traci Verardo Torres, of the California State Parks Foundation, which is protesting against the proposal.

The impact would be felt from the northern limits of the Sierra Nevada mountains — with the proposed shutdown of a park in memory of the doomed members of the Donner party, stranded travellers who resorted to cannibalism during the winter snows — to the deserts south of San DiegoSchwarzenegger’s proposal forces the closure of the only camp grounds inside the giant redwood forests to the north, and it blocks access to Lake Tahoe, though the site is shared by California with Nevada. “All of the parks in Lake Tahoe are proposed for closure,” said Verardo Torres. “If [they] close there would not be a way legally for the public to access the lakes.”

The order would also shutter urban tourist attractions such as San Francisco’s Angel Island — the Ellis Island of America’s Pacific Coast, where the barracks where Chinese migrants were quarantined are preserved. It is not immediately clear, in any case, how California will put vast tracts of land off-limits. “They would have to fence it and guard it to keep people out, and the effort they would have to extend to keep people out would cost just as much to run the park,” said Siegenthaler.

California could be digging itself into a yet deeper financial hole by its actions, some say. Many of the parks are a source of revenue for state and local communities. “Each visitor to a state park is worth $57 per visit. The parks have generated millions throughout California,” said Tim Gibbs, programme manager at the National Parks Conservation Association. “It’s almost as if they are shooting themselves in the foot.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Broke California poised to shut parks

• Public may lose access to 80% of nature reserves
• State’s plan digs deeper financial hole, say critics

It is hard to envisage a no-entry sign tagged to a towering redwood tree. But the recession – writ on an epic scale in California’s proposal to close 220 state parks – is forcing the American public to confront the closure of the great outdoors.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, California’s governor, is trying to make up a $26bn (£16bn) budget shortfall, and has suggested that California can no longer afford to run its parks.

Conservationists are meanwhile arguing that California cannot afford not to. And this week the federal government appeared to partly agree, with the National Parks Service threatening to seize some of the sites if Schwarzenegger goes ahead with the closures.

The proposed shutdown of the parks would affect 80% of California’s nature reserves, historic sites and recreation areas, and restrict access to 30% of the state’s coastline. Affected areas would stretch from the mountains of the Sierra Nevadas to the beaches and wetlands of Big Sur, and to the deserts of San Diego, where some of the last peninsular bighorn sheep roam.

California is not alone. The crisis has also exposed hitherto hidden casualties of the economic downturn, with states from Oregon to Illinois, and New York to Tennessee, struggling to stretch resources.

Other states have proposed budgets that would put closed signs on parks and historic sites, though none so far has adopted measures as extreme as those being put forward in California.

Pennsylvania presented a budget proposal last month that would shut 35 of its 117 state parks. Several states have been forced to scale back opening hours and services, and dismiss rangers, faced with cuts to budgets – ranging from 39% in Georgia to 57% in Idaho.

The federal government does not have the resources to save more than a handful of California’s parks, let alone all of those across the US. Nonetheless, the National Parks Service issued a letter warning Schwarzenegger that it would use protection clauses under the original land deeds to the states, so as to take control of six parks in the San Francisco area, the dunes around the Big Sur and elsewhere.

“We really are just looking for ways we can keep those places open,” said David Siegenthaler, the National Parks Service’s manager for the state of California. “In these economic times it is probably even more important that people have access to good places.”

Conservationists believe parks can withstand a year or so of closure without lasting harm. But fewer ranger stations will mean increased risk of vandalism, and less maintenance will lead to environmental degradation.

“If it is a year or two I don’t think the damage will be a long lasting situation,” said Philip McKnelly, director of the National Association of State Park Directors. “But ultimately it is going to show as damage to resources.”

A survey of state park directors in mid-May suggested most states had cut spending on parks by 15% in their 2008 budgets, and were considering steeper cuts in the next fiscal year, which started on 1 July for many. In California, the loss will be immediate, conservationists say, putting some of the state’s most visited sites off-limits.

Critics also fear the closures could be irreversible. “Once those places are closed it becomes very difficult to re-open them,” said Traci Verardo Torres, of the California State Parks Foundation, which is protesting against the proposal.

The impact would be felt from the northern limits of the Sierra Nevada mountains — with the proposed shutdown of a park in memory of the doomed members of the Donner party, stranded travellers who resorted to cannibalism during the winter snows — to the deserts south of San DiegoSchwarzenegger’s proposal forces the closure of the only camp grounds inside the giant redwood forests to the north, and it blocks access to Lake Tahoe, though the site is shared by California with Nevada. “All of the parks in Lake Tahoe are proposed for closure,” said Verardo Torres. “If [they] close there would not be a way legally for the public to access the lakes.”

The order would also shutter urban tourist attractions such as San Francisco’s Angel Island — the Ellis Island of America’s Pacific Coast, where the barracks where Chinese migrants were quarantined are preserved. It is not immediately clear, in any case, how California will put vast tracts of land off-limits. “They would have to fence it and guard it to keep people out, and the effort they would have to extend to keep people out would cost just as much to run the park,” said Siegenthaler.

California could be digging itself into a yet deeper financial hole by its actions, some say. Many of the parks are a source of revenue for state and local communities. “Each visitor to a state park is worth $57 per visit. The parks have generated millions throughout California,” said Tim Gibbs, programme manager at the National Parks Conservation Association. “It’s almost as if they are shooting themselves in the foot.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Broke California poised to shut parks

• Public may lose access to 80% of nature reserves
• State’s plan digs deeper financial hole, say critics

It is hard to envisage a no-entry sign tagged to a towering redwood tree. But the recession – writ on an epic scale in California’s proposal to close 220 state parks – is forcing the American public to confront the closure of the great outdoors.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, California’s governor, is trying to make up a $26bn (£16bn) budget shortfall, and has suggested that California can no longer afford to run its parks.

Conservationists are meanwhile arguing that California cannot afford not to. And this week the federal government appeared to partly agree, with the National Parks Service threatening to seize some of the sites if Schwarzenegger goes ahead with the closures.

The proposed shutdown of the parks would affect 80% of California’s nature reserves, historic sites and recreation areas, and restrict access to 30% of the state’s coastline. Affected areas would stretch from the mountains of the Sierra Nevadas to the beaches and wetlands of Big Sur, and to the deserts of San Diego, where some of the last peninsular bighorn sheep roam.

California is not alone. The crisis has also exposed hitherto hidden casualties of the economic downturn, with states from Oregon to Illinois, and New York to Tennessee, struggling to stretch resources.

Other states have proposed budgets that would put closed signs on parks and historic sites, though none so far has adopted measures as extreme as those being put forward in California.

Pennsylvania presented a budget proposal last month that would shut 35 of its 117 state parks. Several states have been forced to scale back opening hours and services, and dismiss rangers, faced with cuts to budgets – ranging from 39% in Georgia to 57% in Idaho.

The federal government does not have the resources to save more than a handful of California’s parks, let alone all of those across the US. Nonetheless, the National Parks Service issued a letter warning Schwarzenegger that it would use protection clauses under the original land deeds to the states, so as to take control of six parks in the San Francisco area, the dunes around the Big Sur and elsewhere.

“We really are just looking for ways we can keep those places open,” said David Siegenthaler, the National Parks Service’s manager for the state of California. “In these economic times it is probably even more important that people have access to good places.”

Conservationists believe parks can withstand a year or so of closure without lasting harm. But fewer ranger stations will mean increased risk of vandalism, and less maintenance will lead to environmental degradation.

“If it is a year or two I don’t think the damage will be a long lasting situation,” said Philip McKnelly, director of the National Association of State Park Directors. “But ultimately it is going to show as damage to resources.”

A survey of state park directors in mid-May suggested most states had cut spending on parks by 15% in their 2008 budgets, and were considering steeper cuts in the next fiscal year, which started on 1 July for many. In California, the loss will be immediate, conservationists say, putting some of the state’s most visited sites off-limits.

Critics also fear the closures could be irreversible. “Once those places are closed it becomes very difficult to re-open them,” said Traci Verardo Torres, of the California State Parks Foundation, which is protesting against the proposal.

The impact would be felt from the northern limits of the Sierra Nevada mountains — with the proposed shutdown of a park in memory of the doomed members of the Donner party, stranded travellers who resorted to cannibalism during the winter snows — to the deserts south of San DiegoSchwarzenegger’s proposal forces the closure of the only camp grounds inside the giant redwood forests to the north, and it blocks access to Lake Tahoe, though the site is shared by California with Nevada. “All of the parks in Lake Tahoe are proposed for closure,” said Verardo Torres. “If [they] close there would not be a way legally for the public to access the lakes.”

The order would also shutter urban tourist attractions such as San Francisco’s Angel Island — the Ellis Island of America’s Pacific Coast, where the barracks where Chinese migrants were quarantined are preserved. It is not immediately clear, in any case, how California will put vast tracts of land off-limits. “They would have to fence it and guard it to keep people out, and the effort they would have to extend to keep people out would cost just as much to run the park,” said Siegenthaler.

California could be digging itself into a yet deeper financial hole by its actions, some say. Many of the parks are a source of revenue for state and local communities. “Each visitor to a state park is worth $57 per visit. The parks have generated millions throughout California,” said Tim Gibbs, programme manager at the National Parks Conservation Association. “It’s almost as if they are shooting themselves in the foot.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


GM reborn after 40 bankruptcy days

US government takes majority stake in new company to buy most of carmaker’s assets

General Motors is poised to emerge as a new company later today after only 40 days in bankruptcy.

When GM filed for bankruptcy at the beginning of June, the process had been expected to take as long as three months. But the carmaker is set to re-emerge even faster than rival Chrysler, which came out of bankruptcy on 10 June after 42 days.

GM’s chief executive Fritz Henderson is holding a news conference in Detroit at 9am local time (2pm BST) to announce the completion of the sale of most of the company’s assets to a new concern that is majority-owned by the US government.

He will also outline his plans to make the company profitable again. These include massive cost reductions aimed at streamlining GM’s bureaucratic management structure. The carmaker is cutting a further 4,000 white-collar jobs, including 450 top managers. It employs 88,000 people in the US and 235,000 worldwide.

Once the world’s largest carmaker, the company has been hit by the worst slump in US car sales in 26 years. It will emerge cleansed of debts and troubled contracts that nearly dragged it to collapse and liquidation.

It joined rival Chrysler to ask for $37bn (£22.8bn) of government funding earlier this year. But this did not save both firms from falling into bankruptcy after bondholders balked at having their loans wiped out.

On 1 June, GM officially declared itself bankrupt – the largest bankruptcy filing by a US manufacturing company.

The 101-year-old carmaker sought legal protection – known as Chapter 11 – from its creditors after running up losses of $81bn over four years.

A bankruptcy order went into effect yesterday allowing GM to sell most of its assets to a new company 61%-owned by the US government.

Some of GM’s creditors said the government should have let the carmaker fail. But US bankruptcy judge Robert Gerber wrote in a 7 July ruling that a liquidation would be “staggering” to the public.

The case “raises the spectre of systemic failure throughout the North American auto industry, and grievous damage to all of the communities in which GM operates,” the judge wrote.

The new General Motors will focus on four key brands – Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC. It is in the middle of selling Saturn, Saab, Hummer and Opel, and will discontinue Pontiac by the end of the year.

“It is the smaller, leaner, tougher, better cost-focused GM,” said George Magliano, a car manufacturing analyst with the consulting firm IHS Global Insight. “But they still have to deal with the problems they faced longer-term.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Six charged with ‘boiler room’ fraud

Six former executives at Sky Capital, a stockbroker once listed on London’s Alternative Investment Market, were charged by US authorities yesterday with fiddling investors out of $140m (£87.2m) by operating a so-called “boiler room” fraud in which shareholders’ funds were used to bankroll lavish boardroom lifestyles including corporate jets, luxury hotels and adult entertainment.

The US department of justice filed criminal indictments against Sky’s founder, Ross Mandell, the firm’s former president, Stephen Shea, and four registered brokers at the company.

Regulators say the men used high-pressure tactics to sell largely worthless shares, enriching themselves and paying victims of previous scams.

“Boiler room tactics like those used by Sky Capital and its brokers undercut the level of honesty and fair play we seek to maintain in the securities markets,” said James Clarkson, acting director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s New York office. “This firm and these brokers went to great lengths to repeatedly lie to investors, pressuring them into buying stock without telling them it would be nearly impossible to sell those shares.”

Charges were laid three years after the FBI raided the offices of Sky, which is based on Wall Street. The company’s shares were delisted by AIM in 2006.

According to prosecutors, Sky’s senior executives manipulated the secondary market in the company’s shares by making false promises and material omissions in fundraisings. They aggressively dissuaded investors from selling and enforced a “no net sales” policy whereby brokers were ordered not to accept any sell orders without a matching buy order.

If convicted, the men face up to 25 years in prison and fines of as much as $5m (£3.1m). US prosecutors acknowledged the assistance of Britain’s Financial Services Authority in carrying out a transatlantic inquiry.

Mandell, 52, has a colourful past – he was briefly suspended from securities dealing in 1995 following a past investigation into irregularities and he has acknowledged fighting cocaine and alcohol addictions.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Media Talk USA: Time for a US BBC?

Is the financial crisis and the internet revolution the perfect opportunity to create a completely new media organisation? A US version of the BBC. It’s the brainchild of David Fanning, executive producer of Frontline on PBS.

The panel looks at the mini-scandal that engulfed the Washington Post over plans to charge for access to its reporters.

What does the panel make of Sarah Palin’s surprise exit from politics? The rest of the media appears baffled.

We look at transition from the Iranian elections to Michael Jackson’s death via twitter. Susan Bennett from the Newseum in Washington DC compares coverage of the singer’s death to Elvis.

Jeff jetted into the Aspen Ideas Festival and brought back and interview with the Knight Foundation’s Alberto Ibargüen on his vision for the future of journalism.

Joining Jeff in the studio this month is Alan Murray, deputy managing editor of the Wall Street Journal, and Nick Denton, the founder of Gawker Media.

WARNING: contains strong language

Leave your comments below.

Subscribe free via iTunes to ensure every episode gets delivered.

Bookmark our home page where you can find every programme.

Join our Facebook group.

Follow us on our Twitter feed.

Check out Jeff’s blog.

Thanks to City University New York for allowing us to use their excellent studio facilities just off Times Square.


New-look GM gets green light from US judge

• Judge rules that creating New GM was only way to guarantee the carmaker’s future
• Creditors’ group fails to block restructuring

The rescue of General Motors has cleared a major hurdle, with a US judge last night approving the sale of its most profitable assets to a new company.

Judge Robert Gerber ruled that creating New GM was the only way to guarantee the carmaker’s future.

“As nobody can seriously dispute, the only alternative to an immediate sale is liquidation – a disastrous result for GM’s creditors, its employees, the suppliers who depend on GM for their own existence, and the communities in which GM operates,” said Gerber. The sale would “prevent the death of the patient on the operating table,” he added.

General Motors was put into bankruptcy protection on 1 June, weighed down by billions of dollars of debt. Under a restructuring plan agreed with the US government, many dealerships and factories will close and the GM workforce will shrink dramatically to create a leaner company.

A group of creditors had attempted to block the fast-track restructuring, claiming their rights were being ignored, but Gerber was not swayed by their argument.

“In the event of a liquidation, creditors now trying to increase their incremental recoveries would get nothing,” he said.

The US government had threatened to cut its funding to GM if the sale was not completed by 10 July.

New GM will include valuable assets such as the Cadillac and Chevrolet brands. Its US manufacturing workforce is to drop to just 38,000 by 2011, from 113,000 in 2006.

General Motors Europe, which includes Vauxhall, is already being sold while a buyer has also been found for its Hummer brand. Unwanted parts of the business will be liquidated. The chief executive, Fritz Henderson, told Gerber last week that winding up Old GM could take three years and cost up to $1.25bn.

The US government will hand the new company a $60bn cash injection in return for its 60% stake, with the rest divided between the United Auto Workers union (17.5%), the Canadian government (12%) and GM bondholders (about 10%).

Gerber’s decision means that a restructured GM could be out of bankruptcy protection by September, although there is still time for opponents to file legal challenges.

Steve Jakubowski, a lawyer representing product-liability claimants, said he would keep fighting the sale because the restructuring plan did not make New GM liable for lawsuits from the victims of car accidents that happened before it went into bankrupcy.

The sale of GM Europe was thrown into confusion last Friday when Beijing Automotive Industry Corporation (BAIC), the Chinese state-owned carmaker, filed a late offer for the group.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Dan Roberts on Bernard Madoff’s sentence

Bernard Madoff has been handed a sentence of 150 years for masterminding a $65bn (£38bn) fraud. It reflects the severity of the crime, says Dan Roberts


Madoff: ‘I have left legacy of shame’

In a sign of the anger that the fraud has stirred, US marshals were positioned behind Madoff, who was dressed in a dark suit and white shirt, in court as a protective measure

The disgraced financier Bernie Madoff has been sentenced to the maximum 150 years in prison for masterminding a $65bn (£38bn) fraud that wrecked the lives of thousands of investors.

The US district judge Denny Chin described the fraud as “staggering” and said the “breach of trust was massive” and that a message was being sent by the sentence. There had been no letters submitted in support of Madoff’s character, he said. Victims in the courtroom clapped as the term was read out.

The sentence, which means the 71-year old fraudster will end his days in prison, was handed down at an emotional hearing in a lower Manhattan courtroom, where victims were given the chance to tell how the fraud had destroyed their livelihoods.

Dominic Ambrosino, an ex-prison officer, said he and his wife Ronnie Sue had their “entire life savings wiped out” by Madoff. Another said Madoff had “cheated so he could lead a life of luxury”; another still said Madoff had “discarded her like roadkill” and that she was now living on food stamps. In passing down the sentence, judge Chin referred to one instance where he had comforted a widow and then taken her money. He will serve his sentence in the US north-east.

In a sign of the anger that the fraud has stirred, US marshals were positioned behind Madoff, who was dressed in a dark suit and white shirt, in court as a protective measure. According to reporters in the courtroom, Madoff sat looking down in front of him as his victims gave vent to their fury.

Standing in front of the judge, Madoff appeared remorseful. “I have left a legacy of shame, as some of my victims have pointed out.” He said he had made a terrible mistake and was tormented by what had happened. “I cannot make an excuse for my behaviour”. He said had deceived his family and that his wife Ruth cried herself to sleep every night. He described reports that he and his wife were unsympathetic to victims as untrue”.

Madoff pleaded guilty in March to 11 counts of fraud, theft and money laundering. The sentencing, in what has been one of the biggest frauds ever seen on Wall Street, was eagerly anticipated. Described by victims in written testimony as a “thief and a monster”, Madoff has become an emblem for the greed that pitched the world into recession. Nearly 9,000 victims have filed claims for losses in Madoff’s corrupt financial empire.

Assistant US attorney, Marc Litt, had been pressing for 150 years, due to the “scope, duration and nature” of the fraud. Madoff’s lawyer, Ira Lee Sorkin, had called for leniency and was hoping to keep the sentence as low as 12 years, asking the judge to “set aside the emotion and hysteria attendant to this case.” He described Madoff in court as a “deeply flawed human being” and said the maximum sentence was “absurd”. He also noted that he had given himself up and was co-operating with authorities, although judge Chin said he had not told everything that he knew about the fraud.

Madoff’s famous victims included the film directors Steven Speilberg and Pedro Almodóvar, actors Kevin Bacon and Zsa Zsa Gabor and the author Elie Wiesel.

Ruined lives

But there were many more anonymous and less wealthy people who had their lives ruined by Madoff, including teachers, famers and mechanics. Many invested in so called “feeder funds”, which often did little to advertise their connection to Madoff, and they had little or no idea that their money had been lost until they received letters from their financial advisors. The scandal has been linked to at at least two suicides, including a British former soldier, he said he could not face the prospect of bankruptcy after losing his savings in the Madoff fraud.

In written statements ahead of the sentencing, more than 100 victims detailed how Madoff had wrecked their lives and in many cases squandered their pensions. Jack Cutter, an 80-year-old from Colorado and former engineer, said he had been forced back to work and taken a job as a meat clerk in a local grocery store. Korean war veteran Allan Goldstein said he and his wife had been forced to sell their home and were living in their daughter’s spare room.

Another, Julie Behar, wrote that Madoff deserved a “sentence befitting a thief and murderer” while a Connecticut doctor said the entire retirement plan of his practice had been wiped out, leaving 140 employees with nothing.

Professional investors were also fooled. A fund managed by Nicola Horlick, described as the City’s “superwoman”, had 9% of its cash invested with Madoff.

The demand for access to the sentencing were so high that two additional rooms were provided for defrauded investors, media and spectators to watch on closed-circuit television.

The focus of the investigation is now expected to shift to Madoff’s wife Ruth and the couple’s two sons, Andrew and Mark, who both worked for the business. They claim they had no knowledge of the fraud and have not faced any charges but many victims are sceptical that Madoff could have managed the scheme on his own. His sons have not visited him in prison.

The only other person to face charges has been an accountant accused of helping to mismanage Madoff’s books.

Fixture on the New York scene

The disgraced financier built his career and his one-time glowing reputation from nothing. He raised money to set up his first investment company by taking summer jobs as a lifeguard on Rockaway Beach, a down at heal neighbourhood in Queens, and later installing sprinkler systems. During the 1990s, he served as chairman of Nasdaq, the electronic share trading marketplace that competes with the New York Stock Exchange. He also became well known for being something of a philanthropist, making multi-million dollar donation to hospitals, cancer charities and Jewish groups.

He became a fixture on the New York social scene and met many of his investors at upmarket parties. He lived with his wife Ruth in a $7m home on New York’s swanky Upper East Side and the couple also owned homes in the Hamptons on Long Island and in Palm Beach, Florida. His wife still lives in their Upper East Side home and recently snapped at tabloid photographers as they pursued her on the New York subway.

Last weeek, a judge issued a preliminary $171bn fofeiture striping Madoff of all his personal property and $80m in assets his wife Ruth claimed was hers. His wife has been allowed to keep $2.5m in cash, according to an agreement with prosecutors.

But six months after his arrest, prosecutors still do not know exactly how much money Madoff took or what his victims might hope to recover. It could months or even years to resolve all of the claims.

When he admitted to the fraud, Madoff said it had begun in the 1990s, as he tried to navigate the recession. He said he had hoped he would be able to extricate himself from the scheme when the markets recovered but instead just got deeper in. As the years went by he realised that the day when his fraud was discovered “would inevitably come”. He told the court at the time that he was “deeply sorry and ashamed”.

Angry with the SEC

He had confessed to his sons late last year that the investment business was a “big lie”.

Madoff masterminded a huge “Ponzi” scheme. Instead of investing client’s money in secrities, it was held with a bank and new deposits used to pay bogus returns to give the impression that the business was successful. At the time of his arrest in December, he claimed to manage $65bn of investors money, but in reality there was just $1bn left. The business employed 25 people in London’s Mayfair. Madoff had claimed that his investments produced gains of roughly 1% a month for two decades, which many experts now say should have raised a red flag. Some have directed their fury at the securities and exchange commission, the US financial watchdog, which failed to spot the fraud. An internal investigation at the SEC is expected by the end of September.

At the same time, Madoff, whose name, pronounced “made-off”, might have been coined by Dickens for a financial crook, lived a lavish lifestyle and prosecutors have set about seizing assets including property and boats.

Madoff ran his business like a club and would throw out investors who asked too many questions. Many invested through personal recommendation. Joyce Greenberg, a retired financial adviser in Texas said her family had begun investing money with Madoff in the 1970s after being introduced by her stepbrother. “I hate computers and I never tried to figure out what he was doing because the bookkeeping all added up,” she said.

Corporate America has suffered a series of massive frauds during the past decade, including scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and more recently the financial empire run by Texas billionaire Allen Stanford. Former WorldCom chief Benrard Ebbers is serving 25 years for accounting fraud. Former Enron chief executive Jeffrey Skilling was sentenced to more than 24 years in prison although the sentence was overturned. He remains in prison awaiting resentencing.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Madoff faces sentencing

Many of Madoff’s victims have already demanded that he should never be released – but his lawyers are hoping for a sentence of 12 years

Crowds have begun gathering outside a New York court today ahead of Bernard Madoff’s sentencing, where the convicted fraudster could be handed to up to 150 years in prison for his $65bn (£39.5bn) fraud.

The hearing in New York started at 10am local time (3pm BST), and before Madoff learns his fate, up to 11 victims told the court how they have been hurt by the sudden, unexpected loss of their savings.

Many of these victims have already demanded that Madoff should never be released. Assistant US attorney, Marc Litt, has backed that view, arguing that the “scope, duration and nature” of Madoff’s activities mean the disgraced 71-year-old should receive the maximum sentence of 150 years, or failing that an effective life sentence.

But Madoff’s lawyers are hoping he might receive as little as 12 years despite admitting the biggest Wall Street fraud. Given Madoff’s age, it is unlikely he will leave prison. But the length of the sentence will also determine the type of facility in which Madoff serves his sentence.

John Coffee, a law professor at Columbia law school, predicted that Judge Denny Chin, who is conducting the case, will impose a sentence of between 20 and 30 years. A sentence at the lower end of this scale might mean he avoids being incarcerated in a maximum security prison.

Madoff is expected to address the court himself. According to his lawyer he will tell the court about “the shame he has felt” and “the pain he has caused”.

Madoff pleaded guilty in March to a range of charges, including securities fraud, money laundering and perjury. Over 13,000 people lost money through the collapse of Madoff Securities – famous victims include actor Zsa Zsa Gabor and film director Steven Spielberg.

Before sentencing, the court will hear victim impact statements. Over 100 people wrote to Chin to explain how they have suffered from the fraud. Many lost all the money they put aside for retirement, or to pay college fees. Although some were already wealthy, meeting Madoff on the New York social circuit, others were of more modest means and sometimes were not even aware their money had been invested with Madoff.

The tone of today’s hearing was set by victims such as Jesse Cohen, who called Madoff “a thief and a monster”. Another victim, Ronnie Sue Ambrosino, wrote that “the birds that had been chirping stopped singing. The sun stopped shining” after she and her husband learned they had lost their life savings.

Madoff claimed for decades that he delivered market-beating returns through canny investments in shares and bonds. But in reality, his empire was a Ponzi scheme in which money was moved around the world to give the impression of successful trading, and money from new clients was used to pay off old ones.

Detectives are now investigating Madoff’s wife, Ruth, and the couple’s children Andrew and Mark. Both sons worked for Madoff, but claimed they had no knowledge of the fraud. But once today’s court hearing is completed, prosecutors are expected to intensify their efforts.

“In a case as complex as this, we are taking one step at a time,” a source close to the US attorney’s office told the Observer. “When Madoff is sentenced, that will be one major step completed which will free up resources for the investigation to shift to others.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds