RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘us veterans administration’

US military accepts that front-line soldiers need their smokes

US soldier smoking near Baquba, Iraq, 2007

American troops are not to be banned from smoking in war zones, the US Defence Department says.

The decision comes despite a recent study which recommended the US military should be tobacco-free.

Pentagon spokesman, Geoff Morrell, said US troops were already making enough sacrifices in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He said Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, did not want to add to the stress of the troops by taking away their right to smoke.

But Mr Morrell said the Pentagon would examine the recent study to see what else could be done to move towards banning tobacco in the military.

He said: "Obviously it is not our preference to have a force that is using tobacco products."

‘Fearless warrior’

A report commissioned by the US government said last week that the US military should be smoke-free in the next 20 years.

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) said 30% of army personnel are smokers, leading to "very high" economic and health costs.

But it acknowledged that the change could be hard to introduce, as smoking has "long been associated with the image of a tough, fearless warrior".

The Pentagon has said it supports the idea and believes it is "achievable".

The report, commissioned by the Pentagon and the US Veterans’ Administration (VA), said the Pentagon spends more than $1.6bn (£1bn) every year on tobacco-related medical care, hospital treatment and lost days of work.

It said that rates of tobacco smoking in the military have increased since 1998, and may be as high as 50% among service personnel returning from duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

US military to cut out smoking – but it’ll take 20 years to do it

A US marine smokes a cigarette outside Baghdad, Iraq (file image)

The US military should be smoke-free within the next 20 years, says a government-commissioned report.

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) said 30% of army personnel are smokers, leading to "very high" economic and health costs.

But it acknowledged that the change could be hard to introduce, as smoking has "long been associated with the image of a tough, fearless warrior".

The Pentagon has said it supports the idea and believes it is "achievable".

The report, commissioned by the Pentagon and the US Veterans’ Administration (VA), says the US Defense Department spends more than $1.6bn (£1bn) every year on tobacco-related medical care, hospital treatment and lost days of work.

It said that rates of tobacco smoking in the military have increased since 1998, and may be as high as 50% among service personnel returning from duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Soldiers who smoked were less fit, had worse night vision, and recovered more slowly from wounds.

"These troops are essentially putting their lives at risk twice: once in service to their country and once in service to tobacco," said Stuart Bondurant, chair of the report committee.

"Tobacco is a long term engagement – it kills slowly and insidiously."

‘Achievable’

The report said the armed services already "acknowledge that tobacco use impairs the readiness of military personnel and results in enormous health and financial costs".

But it criticised them for allowing smoking on military sites, giving less attention to tobacco use than alcohol abuse and for selling tobacco products to troops at reduced prices.

A spokesperson for the Pentagon said the department was in full support of the goal of a tobacco-free military.

Cynthia Smith told the AFP news agency that the goal was "achievable through the development and execution of a comprehensive plan as recommended by the IOM report".

"We look forward to using the committee’s findings and recommendations as we address this challenging health and readiness issue," she said. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.