RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Wales’

Lyle says Montgomerie cheated

• 1985 Open champion angry at 2010 Ryder Cup snub
• Captaincy rival questions fellow Scot’s suitability

Sandy Lyle, whose withdrawal from last year’s Open after nine holes in driving rain is widely assumed to have scuppered his chances of becoming 2010 Ryder Cup captain, claimed yesterday that Colin Montgomerie eventually got the job despite being guilty of “a form of cheating”.

“That is far worse than someone pulling out [of the Open] because of sore knuckles,” said the 51-year-old Scot, opening a can of worms that Montgomerie, and those who run European golf, hoped had long been closed. “You have Monty dropping the ball badly – that’s what you would call a form of cheating.

“If anything was going to be held against Monty, you would think, ‘Yeah, well that’s a case where he was breaking the rules.’ And there have been other times where he has been called in to see videos.”

In the aftermath of his selection as captain this year Montgomerie had spoken emotionally about receiving the endorsement of the European Tour’s players committee – the same one that upbraided him four years ago over his conduct during the Indonesian Open, where he appeared to take an incorrect drop after a rain delay.

Lyle’s other comment was a reference to the 2002 Volvo Masters, when Montgomerie was asked by rules officials to look at footage which appeared to show his ball moving as he was about to address it. No penalty was imposed after the Scot confirmed to those officials he had not grounded his club and he went on to share the title with Bernhard Langer.

After the Indonesian Open incident, Montgomerie was cleared of any wrong-doing by rules officials but subsequently he apologised for an “unwitting error” and donated his £24,000 prize money to charity. That was supposed to be that, although a small but dedicated band of naysayers will never forget or forgive.

Clearly Lyle is a paid-up member of that club, although his criticism of his fellow Scot will inevitably be viewed against the backdrop of the two men’s complicated personal relations. At one stage Montgomerie was Lyle’s most public supporter for the job of the Ryder Cup captain in 2010 – at least he was until he got the job himself. Since then, according to Lyle, the pair have had minimal contact. “I rang him a few times after the decision but didn’t hear back. Eventually I got a letter but I got the impression it was written by his manager,” he said.

Lyle, who won the 1985 Open at Royal St George’s and the 1987 Masters, is the only member of European golf’s so-called Big Five from the 80s and 90s who has never captained a Ryder Cup team. He had long campaigned for, and believed he would get, the job in Wales next year. Lyle then hinted he would gladly accept the job of vice-captain in 2010 if asked by Montgomerie, although that would now seem unlikely, to say the least.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Lyle says Montgomerie cheated

• 1985 Open champion angry at 2010 Ryder Cup snub
• Captaincy rival questions fellow Scot’s suitability

Sandy Lyle, whose withdrawal from last year’s Open after nine holes in driving rain is widely assumed to have scuppered his chances of becoming 2010 Ryder Cup captain, claimed yesterday that Colin Montgomerie eventually got the job despite being guilty of “a form of cheating”.

“That is far worse than someone pulling out [of the Open] because of sore knuckles,” said the 51-year-old Scot, opening a can of worms that Montgomerie, and those who run European golf, hoped had long been closed. “You have Monty dropping the ball badly – that’s what you would call a form of cheating.

“If anything was going to be held against Monty, you would think, ‘Yeah, well that’s a case where he was breaking the rules.’ And there have been other times where he has been called in to see videos.”

In the aftermath of his selection as captain this year Montgomerie had spoken emotionally about receiving the endorsement of the European Tour’s players committee – the same one that upbraided him four years ago over his conduct during the Indonesian Open, where he appeared to take an incorrect drop after a rain delay.

Lyle’s other comment was a reference to the 2002 Volvo Masters, when Montgomerie was asked by rules officials to look at footage which appeared to show his ball moving as he was about to address it. No penalty was imposed after the Scot confirmed to those officials he had not grounded his club and he went on to share the title with Bernhard Langer.

After the Indonesian Open incident, Montgomerie was cleared of any wrong-doing by rules officials but subsequently he apologised for an “unwitting error” and donated his £24,000 prize money to charity. That was supposed to be that, although a small but dedicated band of naysayers will never forget or forgive.

Clearly Lyle is a paid-up member of that club, although his criticism of his fellow Scot will inevitably be viewed against the backdrop of the two men’s complicated personal relations. At one stage Montgomerie was Lyle’s most public supporter for the job of the Ryder Cup captain in 2010 – at least he was until he got the job himself. Since then, according to Lyle, the pair have had minimal contact. “I rang him a few times after the decision but didn’t hear back. Eventually I got a letter but I got the impression it was written by his manager,” he said.

Lyle, who won the 1985 Open at Royal St George’s and the 1987 Masters, is the only member of European golf’s so-called Big Five from the 80s and 90s who has never captained a Ryder Cup team. He had long campaigned for, and believed he would get, the job in Wales next year. Lyle then hinted he would gladly accept the job of vice-captain in 2010 if asked by Montgomerie, although that would now seem unlikely, to say the least.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


30,000 involved in organised crime

Home secretary unveils strategy to target 30,000 criminals with more powers to seize assets and close front businesses

Between 25,000 and 30,000 criminals are involved in the “long tail” of a serious organised crime business in Britain that is worth more than £30bn a year, according to a government study.

The home secretary, Alan Johnson, has endorsed a renewed “Al Capone-style” drive to use tax powers to target organised criminals, providing stronger powers to seize assets and shut down front organisations such as saunas and massage parlours.

The study warns of an explosion in new criminal activities as a result of the recession, including sharp increases in “phishing” – taking over bank accounts – the flourishing trade in counterfeit goods and a boom in other types of financial fraud.

The joint report, by the Cabinet Office’s strategy unit and the Home Office, does not directly criticise the performance of the beleaguered three-year-old Serious and Organised Crime Agency (Soca) but it says much tighter oversight is needed by ministers to keep a grip on the problem.

The Home Office said a “strategic centre” for organised crime would be created in the department to clearly define roles in tackling drug trafficking, organised immigration crime and organised fraud. Further action will be taken next summer if needed.

At the same time the capacity of the police is to be augmented by a further four regional asset recovery teams to complete the network across England and Wales. Each will have tax inspector attached and the Home Office is to extend the legal power to “reverse the burden of proof” in civil recovery cases to make it easier to seize assets of those in organised crime.

Renewed efforts to break up organised gangs even after conviction will be made through an attempt to ban the use of mobile phones in prisons and curb the “abuse” of legally privileged visits between lawyers and clients.

The strategy was published as Home Office research placed a question mark over the credibility of Britain’s controls on people trafficking. A Home Office study, based on interviews with 45 convicted people smugglers, found that Britain was seen as a “relatively easy” market offering healthy profits. Those questioned were, however, surprised at the severity of their sentences.

Home Office polling data published today also shows that the public have little recognition that money generated by sales of pirate and counterfeit goods can flow into the criminal economy. The estimate of 25,000 to 30,000 involved in organised crime in Britain is said to include the “lifetime criminals who form the durable core of organised crime groups and loose criminal networks, through to the clusters of subordinates, specialists and others at the lower end of organised criminality”. This covers the “top of the chain” through to the “long tail” of organised crime.

Soca says more than 5,000 of them are already on its radar.

The £30bn a year estimate covers the total cost of economic and social harm caused by organised crime. This figure breaks down into £17.6bn in the costs of drug-related crime, £7.8bn in financial fraud, £4.1bn in smuggling of spirits, tobacco and diesel and £2.4bn a year in organised immigration crime.

The Cabinet Office strategy unit also warns that the recession is creating new opportunities for organised criminals. They cite an increased risk of loan-sharking and trading in counterfeit goods, with a warning of a rise in gang-related violence as they battle for market share.

The banking crisis has also made the public more susceptible to frauds that offer high returns on investments; an increase in “phishing” scams has led to a 75% increase in illegitimate access to victims’ bank accounts in the first three months of 2009 alone.

Another threat comes in the form of a rise in cases of cybercrime, with the number of malware – malicious software programme – attacks on IT systems increasing by 250% last year.

Ministers are also concerned about growing links between weak and failing states and organised crime. Gangs are increasingly basing themselves in places such as Somalia, where drug trafficking networks are increasingly located.

The home secretary said the new strategy went further than ever in taking the fight to organised criminals.

But Deputy Chief Constable Jon Murphy, of the Association of Chief Police Officers, said political decisions could be behind a gap between the scale of the problem and the ability of law enforcement agencies to tackle it. “I think we all acknowledge that gap does exist. Why does it exist?” said Murphy. “Arguably, it could be because it’s a political decision. I think equally it’s because of the changing nature of criminality.

“British organised crime gangs are fluid, flexible and opportunistic. There are no set ranks, rules or structures which you can see with international crime gangs.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


30,000 involved in organised crime

Government backs fresh drive to tackle drugs, immigration and fraud gangs after data shows surge in organised illegal activity

Between 25,000 to 30,000 criminals are involved in the “long tail” of a serious organised crime business in Britain that is worth more than £30bn a year, according to a study published today.

The home secretary, Alan Johnson, has endorsed a renewed drive to use tax powers to target organised criminals, taking even stronger powers to seize their assets, and shut down front organisations such as saunas and massage parlours.

The joint report, by the Cabinet Office’s strategy unit and the Home Office, warns of an explosion in new types of crime as a result of the recession, with sharp increases recorded this year in the counterfeit goods trade, “phishing” – taking over other people’s bank accounts – and other types of financial fraud.

The study does not directly criticise the performance of the beleaguered serious organised crime agency, but it does say much tighter oversight is needed by ministers to keep a grip on the problem.

The Home Office plans create a new strategic centre for organised crime to ensure that clear roles are laid down for tackling drug trafficking, organised immigration crime, and organised fraud. Further action will be taken next summer if a more aggressive approach is not achieved.

At the same time the capacity of the police is to be boosted by a further four regional asset-recovery teams to complete the network across England and Wales. Each will have its own tax inspector, and the Home Office is to extend the teams’ legal powers to “reverse the burden of proof” in civil recovery cases, to make it easier to seize the assets of those involved in organised crime.

The data was published as another Home Office study called into question the credibility of Britain’s controls to curb people-trafficking. The research, based on interviews with 45 convicted people-smugglers, showed that most thought Britain was a soft touch, with a low risk of detection and a market that conferred healthy profits. Many of those surveyed did, however, express surprise at the severity of the sentences they had received.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Afghan strategy ‘right’, Brown says

UK troops in Afghanistan

Gordon Brown has defended the government’s Afghanistan strategy, saying it is the right one despite a "dangerous battle" ahead.

Writing to the Commons Liaison Committee, the prime minister said the military operation was aimed at preventing terrorism coming to the UK.

There is mounting concern about the current offensive, with 15 British soldiers dying in the past 10 days.

Anti-war campaigners have claimed the conflict is "unwinnable".

The current major assault against the Taliban in Helmand aims to improve security ahead of next month’s Afghan elections. Many UK troops are fighting in the south under the auspices of Operation Panchai Palang or Panther’s Claw.

Heroin trade

Mr Brown, who will appear before this committee next week, said the Afghanistan-Pakistan border had emerged as "a new crucible of terrorism" linked to three-quarters of the most serious plots against the UK.

In the letter, he said: "So our purpose is clear: to prevent terrorism coming to the streets of Britain.

"Our security depends on strengthening the Pakistan and Afghan governments to defeat both al-Qaeda and also the Pakistan and Afghan Taliban."

He added that if the Taliban were allowed to "overwhelm Pakistan’s democracy", al-Qaeda would have "greater freedom from which to launch terrorist attacks across the world".

Mr Brown went on: "So this is a fight to clear terrorist networks from Afghanistan and Pakistan, to support the elected governments in both countries against the Taliban, to tackle the heroin trade which funds terrorism and the insurgency, and to build longer term stability."

He also paid tribute to "the fearless work of our troops" and added that despite the "tragic losses", morale remained high.

‘Nightmare’

The Stop the War coalition has announced an emergency protest in London on Monday, calling for British troops to be withdrawn from Afghanistan in light of the heavy losses.

HAVE YOUR SAY

"The British soldiers must suspend all activities in Afghanistan and come home"

Kenneth, London

Send us your comments

A group spokesman said: "The troop surge which was meant to pacify Helmand province has become a nightmare for the British army.

"This unwinnable war must stop now."

One hundred and eighty-four service personnel have died in Afghanistan since 2001, more than the 179 who were killed during the war in Iraq.

On Friday in Helmand, five soldiers from the 2nd Battalion The Rifles were killed in two separate blasts near Sangin, while a member of the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment died near Nad Ali.

A day earlier, a soldier from 4th Battalion The Rifles was killed in a blast near Nad Ali while another from Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment, attached to 1st Battalion Welsh Guards, was killed fighting insurgent forces near Lashkar Gah.

BRITISHCASUALTIES IN AFGHANISTAN MARCH 2006 – JULY 2009

  • 1: Highest monthly toll with 19 dead including 12 killed when a RAF Nimrod crashes in Afghanistan.
  • 2: British death toll reaches 100. Among the 13 fatalities in June is the first British female soldier.
  • 3: British casualties surge as major offensive against Taliban begins in the south. Many are lost to powerful Improvised Explosive Devices.

Graph showing UK deaths in Afghanistan

Return to top
</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Eight British soldiers killed in Afghanistan in a day

• Eight UK soldiers killed in 24 hours
• Afghan death toll eclipses that in Iraq
• Brown warns of ‘very hard summer’

Ministers were bracing themselves for an increasingly bloody conflict in Afghanistan as it became clear that a further eight British soldiers have been killed in 24 hours, the worst combat death toll since the war began.

Five troops were killed in a single incident after they were caught in a bomb blast while on foot patrol. Officials confirmed that 15 troops have been killed in the last 10 days. With the government’s handling of the conflict under increasing scrutiny, Gordon Brown was forced to defend the Afghan mission as he left the G8 summit in Italy. Before heading directly to a private briefing at the military’s operational headquarters at Northwood, Middlesex, he warned of a “very hard summer … It’s not over”.

Speaking at a press conference at L’Aquila before the latest deaths had been announced, with his voice faltering Brown voiced his sympathy for the families of those who have died.

He said: “There is a chain of terror that runs from the mountains and towns of Afghanistan to the streets of Britain. Our resolution to complete the work we have started is undiminished.

“It is in tribute to the members of our forces who have given their lives that we should succeed in the efforts we have begun.”

Bob Ainsworth, the defence secretary, said the conflict was “winnable” but warned there would be no early end to the fighting. “I do believe that we are making progress and I do believe that this is winnable, but it is not winnable in the short term,” he told the BBC. “We are going to have to … get behind our armed forces who are doing the brave fighting.”

The daybegan with the confirmation of two deaths in Helmand province the previous day: one from 4th Battalion The Rifles by an explosion while on foot patrol; the second from the Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment, during a battle with insurgents near Lashkar Gah, the provincial capital. Later, a third soldier from the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment was confirmed as having been killed when the Viking armoured vehicle in which he was travelling was hit.

Then there was worse news as it was confirmed that five troops had died and others were injured in a bomb blast. The deaths took the total number of fatalities in Afghanistan to 184, five more than the total lost in the Iraq conflict.

As the death toll grew, there were poignant scenes at Wootton Bassett, Wiltshire as five coffins draped with the union flag arrived at RAF Lyneham and were met by sombre crowds on the town’s streets.

Relatives of lance corporal Dane Elson, 22, from Bridgend, south Wales, of The 1st Battalion Welsh Guards, wept as the hearse carrying his body passed.

His girlfriend, Claire Wells, 23, was ushered forward and placed two roses on the hearse carrying his coffin. Wells said she had planned to live the rest of her life with Elson. “Now I’ll never see him again, I can’t bear it,” she said. Wells added that she did not believe the troops ought to be in Afghanistan. “They are fighting a war that we cannot win,” she said. “There are too many of our lads dying.”

Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, who broke the consensus among party leaders this week when he criticised the government’s strategy in Afghanistan, said: “This tragic milestone must be a reminder to all of us of the huge sacrifices made day after day by our brave service men and women and their families. The courage and professionalism of our armed forces are second to none.”

Bernard Jenkin MP, a member of the Commons defence select committee, said: “It is astonishing that we are fighting high intensity operations the scale of Afghanistan on a peacetime budget without enough protection mobility and with fewer helicopters per head for armed forces than we had three years ago.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Afghan deaths match Iraq toll as three Britons killed

Afghan conflict has now claimed lives of as many British servicemen and women as that in Iraq after MoD announces third casualty in 24 hours

The conflict in Afghanistan has now claimed the lives of as many British servicemen and women as that in Iraq after the Ministry of Defence announced today that another soldier had been killed.

Ten servicemen have died within the last nine days and the casualty rate is as high as at any point since Afghanistan was invaded in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terror attacks on the US.

The latest casualty – the third to be announced today – was a soldier from the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment. He was killed in southern Afghanistan, the MoD said. Next of kin have been informed.

Officials said the soldier was killed in an explosion during an operation near Nad-e-Ali, in central Helmand province.

“The loss of this brave Tankie has hit us all deeply,” Lieutenant Colonel Nick Richardson, a spokesman for Task Force Helmand, said.

“We grieve for him at this very sad time. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family, friends and colleagues who feel the greatest loss. His loss has not been in vain.”

The death is likely to intensify the debate about whether the Afghanistan operation is worthwhile.

Ministers still strongly insist that the deployment is vital for British security, but the Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, this week questioned whether the government had “the will, strategy or tactics” to do the job properly.

Gordon Brown will go straight to the Northwood headquarters of the armed forces in Middlesex for a private briefing on Afghanistan with military chiefs when he returns to Britain from the G8 summit in Italy.

Speaking at the end the talks today, before the latest casualties were formally announced, the prime minister said that it was “vital” that the British mission succeeded.

He also robustly denied claims by General Lord Guthrie, the former head of the armed forces, that soldiers were dying because the military was short of money.

Earlier, the MoD announced that two soldiers had been killed in Afghanistan yesterday.

One of the men, from 4th Battalion the Rifles, was killed in an explosion while on a foot patrol near Nad-e-Ali.

The other, from the Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment attached to 1st Battalion Welsh Guards, died from a gunshot wound following a battle with insurgents near Lashkar Gah, also in Helmand.

The latest casualties take the Afghanistan death toll to 179, equalling the total number killed in Iraq.

“This tragic milestone must be a reminder to all of us of the huge sacrifices made day after day by our brave servicemen and women and their families,” Clegg said.

“The courage and professionalism of our armed forces are second to none.

“We must never forget the massive debt we owe to those who have paid the ultimate price to ensure we can live in safety.”

The war in Afghanistan, where the British are fighting with other Nato countries to stop Taliban fundamentalists regaining control of the country, has had the backing of all the main political parties as well as the general support of the public.

But ministers are worried that, with the death toll rising and no prospect of an end to the campaign in sight, public opinion could turn.

Brown said: “This is a very hard summer, and it is not over yet.

“It is vital that we see this through. Our resolution to complete the work that we have started in Afghanistan and Pakistan is undiminished.

“It’s in tribute to the members of the armed forces that have given their lives that we should succeed in the efforts that we have begun.”

The prime minister said it was vital the Taliban were pushed back in Helmand province and al-Qaida thwarted across the border in Pakistan.

“We can’t allow the borders of Afghanistan to be lawless places,” he said. “The streets of Britain are safer places as a result of the armed forces’ work in Afghanistan.

“Our job is to secure a stable and democratic Afghanistan.”

Brown also spoke of the “sadness” he felt about young soldiers who were “incredibly professional” and “very courageous” losing their lives.

“My sympathy goes out to every one of the families who have suffered the pain of losing a loved one,” he said.

Bernard Jenkin, a member of the defence select committee, said: “It is astonishing that we are fighting high intensity operations the scale of Afghanistan on a peacetime budget without enough protection mobility and with fewer helicopters per head for armed forces than we had three years ago.”

Guthrie was quoted in the Mail today as saying the Treasury had spent “the minimum they could get away with” on defence.

He said fewer soldiers would be dying if commanders on the ground had more troops and more equipment.

“I spoke to an officer the other day who said that the Treasury had affected the operational safety of our soldiers, by preventing an uplift in our numbers,” Guthrie added.

“As far as helicopters are concerned, of course they need more helicopters. If they had more, it is very likely that fewer soldiers would have been killed by roadside bombs.”

Guthrie blamed Brown directly for the state of MoD funding.

“It is an indication of the unsympathetic view the chancellor of the day [Brown] and the Treasury had of defence when Britain went into southern Afghanistan in 2006,” he said.

“They were prepared to give very large amounts of money to other departments, but the minimum they could get away with to defence.”

When asked about Guthrie’s comments, Brown said the troops in Afghanistan had twice as much helicopter capacity as they did two years ago.

“We have spent over £1bn on vehicles,” he added.

News of the latest casualties came as the bodies of another five British servicemen killed in Afghanistan over the past week – four in Operation Panchai Palang – were returned to the UK.

Bob Ainsworth, the defence secretary, acknowledged this week that there was “gloom and worry” about the British fatalities and admitted more lives would be lost.

But he insisted morale was high in Afghanistan and said it would be a “good thing” for Clegg to talk to some UK troops.

Around 3,000 troops are involved in the British-led Operation Panchai Palang, which began on 19 June and has seen fierce fighting and significant casualties on both sides.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



Where to go wilder in Britain

Scotland and Dartmoor are the only places to legally wild camp in Britain. But there are a few sites that offer a more rugged camping experience. Dixe Wills picks the best.

Find more unusual campsites in tomorrow’s Guardian Travel

Ah, the call of the wild. Unzipping your tent in the morning to discover you weren’t dreaming – you really are camped beside some tranquil mountainside tarn, or in a clearing in a mighty forest, or on a cliff top high above a sparkling sea. With a proper hot summer still on the cards, what could gladden the heart more than getting out into the British countryside with a tent and soaking it all up?

Except, of course, it’s not as simple as that. The enlightened Scots, who have long enjoyed a relaxed attitude to land access, have made wild camping legal more or less anywhere (with a few sensible caveats) since 2003. In the rest of Britain, however, the practice is only officially sanctioned in one area – a section of Dartmoor.

The good news is that there’s now a growing number of campsites south of the border that have begun to offer campers the chance to savour the joys of off-piste camping. Where these sites differ from the norm is that rather than providing beautifully tended croquet-flat lawns, electric hook-ups and hardstanding, they offer chunks of topography just as nature crafted it, open fires on which to incinerate your marshmallows and, typically, a compost loo for those campers who feel no compunction to imitate what bears do in the woods. It may not be wild camping in its purest form but it’s a darn good imitation.

Wales leads the way in wilder campsites, with southern England hot on their heels. The phenomenon, it seems, is yet to catch on in the north of England.

Here’s a selection of the best sites where you can go wild in the country.

Gwalia Farm, Cemaes, Machynlleth, Powys

A large area around a lake is given over to camping at Gwalia, an organic farm that enjoys some quite breathtaking views of Snowdonia. Closer at hand, there are wild orchids, buzzards, kites, nightjars, glow worms, and all manner of aquatic life to look out for, including an otter. Drinking and washing water comes from a natural spring, there are earth loos in the woods and, should you wish to wander, the farm is on the Cambrian Way, Glyndwr’s Way and the Dyfi Valley Way.

• Gwalia Farm. Adult £4, child £2; +44 (0)1650 511377.

Graig Wen Arthog, nr Dolgellau, Gwynedd

Graig Wen admits to playing host to a conventional campsite but, for four weeks a year, visitors are also given the choice of going further afield and pitching in secret meadows, sheltered glades or a high bluff with views out over the Mawddach estuary. Streams and dry stone walls forge their way over the fields and through the woods, while the facilities are suitably wild – extending only to something described as “a tree bog compost toilet”. Best not to ask, I think.

• Graig Wen. From 25 July to 21 August; adult £7 (£10 on Fri/Sat); child £3 (£5); discount offered for backpackers/cyclists; +44 (0)1341 250482.

Gwern Gof Uchaf, Capel Curig, Gwynedd

One for high altitude campers, Gwern Gof Uchaf is an exposed site directly beneath Snowdonia’s famous Tryfan peak and is part of a working hill farm stretching for 750 acres above the Ogwen valley. The Carneddau and Glyders summits can also be tackled from this base camp which is open all year, so you can even introduce your tent to some snow (it’s wonderfully insulating, you know). Comfort comes in the form of hot showers, close by.

• Gwern Gof Uchaf. Adult £4, child £3; +44 (0)1690 720294.

Glyn Y Mul Farm, Aberdulais, West Glamorgan

The river Dulais runs through Glyn Y Mul’s 18-acre wood, making it a memorable location for a bit of communing with nature. The owners particularly welcome grub-eating survivalists to their Lone Wolf Campsite but are also happy to accommodate visitors who merely want to get away from it all. Best of all, should everything go pear-shaped with your attempt to create a shelter from mud filtered through the shells of beech nuts, you can crawl out of the woods for a hot power shower.

• Glyn Y Mul Farm. Adult £5, child £2.50; +44 (0)1639 643204

Camping Wild Wales, Trefin, Pembrokeshire

This is a site whose owners’ mission statement importunes visitors to slough off their urban selves, “strip away those outer layers and feel the breeze of freedom”, so chilling out and relaxing are pretty much compulsory. Lodged halfway between St David’s and Fishguard, just off the Pembrokeshire Coast Path, there’s plenty of room to spread out your shelter of choice or you can take refuge in one of their tipis.

• Camping Wild Wales. Adult £7, child (4-14) £3; +44 (0)1348 837892.

Hole Station Campsite, Highampton, Devon

There are 45 acres of meadow and woodlands at Hole Station but only twelve pitches, making it a little piece of heaven for those who agree with Sartre’s maxim that hell is other people. Approached down a long private lane in a sumptuous, yet quiet, corner of Devon, it’s little wonder that Hole railway station, from which the site takes its name, has long since given up the ghost. You can also rent a tent – very useful if you’re travelling light on the Devon coast-to-coast route, for which Hole marks the halfway point.

• Hole Station Campsite. £12 per pitch (inc. 2 people), extra adults £4, U16s £3, dogs £1. Camp fire kit £5; +44 (0)1409 231266

Yellow Wood Bush Camp, nr Hay-on-Wye, Herefordshire

The folk at Yellow Wood are very much in touch with their inner Ray Mears and offer all manner of courses on bushcraft and wilderness survival on their clutch of forested sites in the shadow of the Black Mountains. However, if you just want to bring along your tent, or string up a tarp or a hammock and do your own thing, that’s cool too. For that added wild touch, the precise location of their sites is not revealed until you’ve booked yourself in.

• Yellow Wood Bush Camp. Adult £5, child £3; +44 (0)7800 767519.

Ashwood Farm, East Grinstead, West Sussex

Proving that being within commuting distance of the capital is still no barrier to camping in the wilds, this farm near the Sussex/Surrey border provides a haven of sylvan tranquillity. It’s also a paradise for children who are free to race up and down the hill, build their own woodland wigwams, dens, shelters or fairy houses according to taste, or just idle away the hours on a tree swing. There’s also a big discount if you can arrive by public transport or under your own steam.

• Ashwood Farm. With car: adult £12; child £6. Without car: £8/£4. Fire kit £5. +44 (0)1342 316129

Dernwood Farm, Waldron, East Sussex

A small family-run farm, Dernwood has an 8-acre field in the woods in which you can pick your spot and another 60-odd acres of ancient forest to explore once you’ve set up camp. The only concessions to home comforts are a water tap and a recently installed loo in a nearby shed. For those who insist on being kept in touch with the outside world, newspapers can be delivered to the farmhouse, a ten-minute walk away. A fleet of wheelbarrows is also on hand for ferrying your gear through the woods.

• Dernwood Farm. Adult £6.50, child (5-15) £4.50, family (2 adults 2 children) £17.50; +44 (0)1435 812726.

And a final one for anyone who wants to try out a wild campsite in Scotland before heading off into the countryside beyond:

Duloch Hamlet, Inverkeithing, Fife

Offering what they euphemistically describe as “limited rustic facilities” (a sawdust toilet and a stand pipe), Duloch Hamlet is a mixture of clearings in woodland and meadows. There are fifteen acres of woods to get happily lost in and hides for watching badgers and deer. There’s also a herb garden if you fancy adding that final flourish to your al fresco feast, and a few pre-erected tents available if you prefer to travel ultra-lite.

• Duloch Hamlet. £6 per person; log kits £3; +44 (0)1383 417681.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


First Ashes Test gets a Celtic feel

Opinions in rugby country divided on arrival of Aussies and barmy army for beginning of series

Usually it is one of the most English of occasions. The MCC members don their blazers and ties, the supporters’ barmy army provides a rowdy musical accompaniment and the Australian batsmen try to make a century at the home of cricket.

Tomorrow, however, there will be a much more Celtic feel to the first match in this year’s Ashes series when it is held not at Lord’s, not even in England, but at the rather less historic Swalec stadium in downtown Cardiff.

The decision to hold an Ashes test match in the Welsh capital has delighted some, annoyed others, including former England and Wales captains, and bemused many Welsh sports fans who tend to prefer a big oval ball to a shiny little red one.

Wales’s first minister, Rhodri Morgan, led the welcome for the Australians yesterday and could not resist teasing the English for letting go of one of the most eagerly awaited games in the sporting calendar. “Anyone who understands the tangled history of the United Kingdom will appreciate the delicious irony of this England home game played in Cardiff, capital of Wales,” he said.

Morgan also suggested that Wales knew best how to host a sporting event. “Sport is so important to us in Wales that we have big stadia like the Millennium stadium right in the city centre, next door to our city centre bars, pubs, clubs and restaurants.”

The arrival of the Ashes certainly boosts Cardiff’s reputation as a great sporting centre. The Millennium stadium hosted hugely popular FA Cup finals while Wembley was being rebuilt and a new football and rugby ground, the Cardiff City stadium, is due to open later this month. Next year Newport, a few miles down the M4, is hosting golf’s Ryder Cup.

For now the Ashes is providing a much-needed fillip for the Welsh economy. The immediate value of the five-day game for Cardiff is put at £10m. Hotels are almost all full and bars, cafes, restaurants and souvenir shops are expecting a busy week.

Experts believe bringing international cricket to Wales could be worth £100m over the next five years.

At a time when many jobs have been lost, 600 casual staff will be employed during the Test match and the number of permanent employees at the redeveloped Swalec stadium has quadrupled.

Hywel Thomas, spokesman for Cardiff and Co, which promotes the city on behalf of public bodies and private companies, said: “The Ashes will bring huge economic benefit to the city. The match will be broadcast to millions around the world. That provides great exposure for the city. The economic value in terms of people spending in hotels and restaurants and bars will be in the region of £10m.”

Thomas said Cardiff was synonymous with sport and pointed to the success of FA Cup finals in Cardiff. “At first people were sceptical but fans came to love it.”

But what do ordinary people make of England playing in Cardiff? At the Owain Glyndwr pub in Cardiff, named after the famous Welsh rebel who led a revolt against the English, not all were convinced. Jeff Evans, a builder, said: “I don’t like cricket much and I’m not keen on England coming to play. It doesn’t seem right.”

Jim Green added: “Call me old-fashioned but I’m a rugby fan. This is rugby country. I’ve never seen a cricket game and don’t intend to.”

At the ground of Lisvane Cricket Club on the outskirts of the city, club chairman Gary Morgan admitted that it was a “bit galling” that the team was called just “England” and the governing body known as the ECB – though its full title is the England and Wales Cricket Board and proud Welshman Simon Jones was a hero of the last home Test series.

“But you’ve got to learn to live with these things,” Morgan added. “It may be a surprise to many but cricket is very strong in south Wales.”

Andrew Hignell, who will be scorer tomorrow and is curating an Ashes exhibition in Cardiff, pointed out thatcricket was the oldest ball game in Wales, first played in the 18th century.

The host for the Test, Glamorgan Cricket, is working hard to boost cricket’s popularity. About 60,000 children have passed through its cricket in the community programme in the last year. Youngsters from as far as Anglesey are travelling to Cardiff for the Ashes.

Peter Edwards, Glamorgan cricket in the community co-ordinator, denied that it was a hard sell promoting the game to Welsh youngsters. “Our national cricket team is England. The children buy into that.” He does concede it is a shame that no Welshman will be running out for England tomorrow.

Liam, one of the children playing cricket in the grounds of Cardiff Castle as part of Glamorgan’s outreach scheme, agreed. “I support England,” he said.

Who was going to win? “Australia,” he replied, sounding very much like an Englishman.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


The Guardian guide to UK hotels

Use our interactive map to find your ideal place to stay – as reviewed by our expert Sally Shalam


Rip-off warning at digital switch

Analogue TVs at recyling centre

Viewers who have yet to convert their televisions to digital are being warned against rip-offs and cons before the analogue signal in Wales is turned off.

The Swansea, Neath and Port Talbot areas will be the first to go digital in August, with the rest of Wales following by March next year.

But it is understood 10% of main TV sets still need to be replaced.

Consumer Focus Wales warned BBC Eye on Wales potential confusion could see people being overcharged when changing.

Wales will become the first nation in the UK to go completely digital next year – via either digital terrestrial TV through an aerial – otherwise known as Freeview – or by cable or satellite dish.

On 12 August, the Kilvey Hill TV transmitter serving 132,000 homes in Swansea, Neath and Port Talbot goes digital.

Ahead of that, newspaper adverts giving consumers advice on how to switch safely will be appearing in the press this week.

But Consumer Focus Wales said it is still concerned that not everybody will be fully informed about the changes and how they can make them.

SWITCHOVER ADVICE

  • Most people will not need new equipment beyond a digital Freeview box on top of their TV
  • But if you do, get more than one quote, compare prices and use a reputable trader
  • Get a written quote for the work you want
  • Source: Consumer Focus Wales

Digit Al, promoting the switchover

Spokesman Gareth Price said the organisation was working to try to protect viewers from scams.

"We’re doing some mystery shopper work, calling up aerial installers and people who sell TVs to try and see what information is about," he said.

"Trading standards officers in Dorset did a piece of work like this a few months a go and they found one case where a TV retailer was suggesting to people that they needed a £1,000 television to make the benefits of digital work for them. Just not true."

He said the bilingual newspaper adverts would be giving advice on how to change to digital.

"Most people won’t need new equipment beyond a digital Freeview box on top of their TV. But if you do, get more than one quote, compare prices and use a reputable trader," he said.

"And finally get a written quote for the work you want.

"What we’re trying to do is make sure that people have the correct information so they can switch safely and not be vulnerable to being ripped off."

Channel choice

Meanwhile, Digital UK, the body over-seeing the switchover, said it is working to ensure the TV signal in Wales is strong, despite the challenges of the country’s geography.

"In parts of Wales analogue television reception isn’t all that wonderful because we’ve got so many hills and valleys," said Emyr Hughes, the national manager for Wales.

"A lot of people have Freeview, but it has to run at low power because Ofcom won’t allow us to put the power up while analogue is there because otherwise the digital signals would interfere with it.

"Now we’re talking about running Freeview after switchover at higher powers – multiplying it by ten.

"So if you’ve got an aerial that isn’t quite pointing at the transmitter or a cable that has been damaged – there will be enough signal blasting out of the transmitter after switchover to be able to deal with most of those problems.

"The new high-powered digital signals plus satellite filling in the gaps means everybody can have a really good choice of channels."

Eye On Wales is on BBC Radio Wales on 29 June at 1830 BST.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.