RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Walker’

Forgotten heroes

British documentary makers Robin Forestier-Walker and Oliver Owen have been tracing Nigerians who fought against the Japanese in Burma during World War II.

On VJ Day, the anniversary of victory over Japan, they tell the veterans’ story.

Private Banana

Mohammed was just 16 when he was pressed into British military service in northern Nigeria against his will.

Now, almost 70 years on, the old war veteran claims he hid his true identity from the recruiting officer.

It was as Private African Banana that he went on to travel 6,300 miles (10,100km) to the jungles of Burma in the Royal West African Frontier Force.

And he has been known as African Banana ever since.

The contribution of West Africans was played down in official versions of the Allied war in Asia, and until now, few have had an opportunity to tell their tale.

In fact, only two in 10 of the soldiers who fought in Burma were white.

The role of Indians and Gurkhas is known. But when Allied commander General William Slim thanked his 14th army at the end of the campaign, he did not even mention the Africans.

Jungle warfare

Nigerians made up more than half of the total force of 90,000 West African soldiers deployed to South East Asia after 1943 as part of the British Army’s 81st and 82nd (West Africa) Divisions.

Although the Burma campaign ended 64 years ago, many remain bitter that their contribution was never adequately recognised.

"Initially I saw the white man as someone better than me. But after the war, I considered him an equal"

Former infantryman Dauda Kafanchan

They were central to the push to clear Japanese forces out of the jungle and mountain ranges of Burma, from where they threatened British India.

This was achieved through a gruelling campaign of jungle marches, battles and ambushes, in which supplies were delivered entirely by air.

Usman Katsina remembers it well.

"Everything that was meant to be used – your food, your clothes, everything – was given to you and you were required to carry it, on your head and back. Some even died from exhaustion, from travelling long distances, with a heavy load," he says.

Some of those who earned the coveted Burma Star had already fought against Mussolini’s forces in East Africa.

West Africans also joined special Chindit units under the command of General Orde Wingate.

The Chindits fought deep inside Japanese-held territory to disrupt lines of communication.

Their enemy was an extremely dangerous opponent. Japanese soldiers were trained well in the art of jungle warfare, where the first rule was concealment.

It was a skill the Nigerian troops had to learn too.

"The Japanese in the jungle were just like snakes – they hid before you could see them, it was very hard," recalls 97-year-old Hassan Sokoto.

‘Lack of recognition’

Umaru Yola fought in the 4th Battalion, Nigeria Regiment. He described how he was hit in the head with a piece of shrapnel that left him with a hole in his skull.

"I didn’t die, so God must have decided to give me a long life," he says.

Nigerian WWII veterans

African recruits served as drivers, artillerymen, engineers, medics and clerks, as well as infantrymen and carriers.

Officer positions were reserved for white expatriates from Britain and other parts of the empire, with only one notable exception: Lieutenant Seth Anthony from the Gold Coast was the British Army’s first African officer.

Despite the hierarchy, the war in Burma played some part in breaking down the race barriers of the era.

"Initially I saw the white man as someone better than me. But after the war, I considered him an equal," recalls former infantryman Dauda Kafanchan.

In post-war Nigeria, the colonial government gave some veterans land to begin new lives as farmers. The project was also a scheme to reduce their potential impact as a new political force.

"We wanted work. But what could we do We were under colonial rule and we couldn’t change anything," said veteran Dangombe, who found himself without prospects at the war’s end.

Nigerian soldiers who chose to continue their military careers went on to form the core of independent Nigeria’s national army, which retains the 81st and 82nd Divisions to this day.

Private Banana later served as a peacekeeper in the Congo and Chad. And he returned to the frontline alongside many of his former comrades in Nigeria’s bloody 1967-1970 civil war.

But many of his former comrades feel the British abandoned their responsibilities to their former servicemen.

Although they were paid off for their service, some claim they were promised allowances which were never paid, despite their repeated efforts over the years.

And it is not only the money – some veterans are still bitter over what they see as a lack of recognition.

"We were supposed to get Long Service and British Empire Medals" says Dangombe.

"But up until now – nothing."


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Joan E. Dowlin: The Healer in Chief

Let’s look at the history of blacks and police in our nation in this century. The story is always familiar. The police say they are protecting lives and the community. They shoot first and ask questions later.

Paul David Walker: Heartbeat of Life

The first organ that develops in the womb is the heart. With all our science we still do not understand exactly what animates its beat….

Larry Jon Wilson:Larry Jon Wilson

By: Dennis Cook

Forget the compelling backstory, the old school shoulda-been-famous tale and disillusionment with the nuts ‘n’ bolts of the music industry that made him withdraw in 1980, and just listen to Larry Jon Wilson‘s self-titled return to recording after a nearly 30 year absence (released June 30 on Drag City). There’s a purity of form, the intimate-as-can-be mingling of a fantastically lived-in voice and the practiced, natural movement of hands on an acoustic guitar, that’s undeniable. “I’m still drinking gin/ sure bought a lot of gin today,” is a simple enough sentiment but delivered with Wilson’s shit-this-feels-real burr it hits your gut like that one shot too many that makes you aware of all the sickness you carry around inside.

While Steve Earle and countless others salute Townes Van Zandt, here’s a living singer-songwriter who pitches a tent not far from Townes’ lonely, sadly true country. And like Townes, Wilson slips in sharp flashes of hope or just catalogs of the small things that get us through. A romantic fiddle floats in and out here, sticking to the edges of Wilson’s singing and picking, and rightly so, but adding a lovely dance hall of the damaged vibe. This whole set lays bare our tattered collective spirit, picking through what’s been left behind by all the wildfires and stupid decisions and holding up what endures, the pleasures and pains that live through the blaze and stumble, the stuff we just can’t shake, for good reasons and bad.

The only folksy release in recent times that even remotely compares is last year’s similar return-to-recording marvel Misfit Scarecrow by Sammy Walker (JamBase review). Like Walker, Larry Jon Wilson drives down to a resounding, unshakable essence – a real, adult, all-too-human understanding given nigh perfect form. This is an instant classic for God’s lost children and you cheat yourself of something special if you miss it.

JamBase | Real Life
Go See Live Music!


Gerrard apologises for punching man in bar

England footballer admits throwing blow in row over music but says he was acting in self-defence

The Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard claimed today he had been acting in self-defence when he punched a man in a row over music.

The England international told Liverpool crown court that he punched Marcus McGee three times during a clash at a bar in Southport.

He said that he had struck the man “to defend myself”, fearing he was about to be hit by McGee. Gerrard, 29, who denies affray, said that, at the time, he was unaware one of his friends, John Doran, had landed the first blow, elbowing McGee in the face.

“I thought he was going to hit me,” Gerrard said.

“He was on his way forward to me and his behaviour had changed from when I was having a discussion with him. I didn’t know why.”

Asked how he felt now, the footballer added: “I am certainly mistaken in thinking he was coming towards me to throw punches at me. Now I know, obviously, he had been struck, reacted and thought the strike was by me and he came into me and that’s when I reacted.

“I am sorry about the whole incident.”

Gerrard denied that he had lost control on the night of the fight.

He had been drinking at the Lounge Inn in Southport to celebrate a 5-1 victory over Newcastle earlier that day. The footballer had been drinking Budweiser and a sweet liqueur drink called a Jammy Donut shot, estimating his level of drunkenness as seven out of 10. Gerrard remained calm and quietly spoken as he gave evidence, repeatedly sipping a glass of water as he stood in the witness box.

“It was very difficult at the time to explain to the police why I did throw the first blows. But it was because I was arguing and I felt as if Marcus was coming forward to hit me.”

He told the jury he had been used to people “mithering” him and he was usually able to smooth things over.

Gerrard said he suffered “a lot of mither” at traffic lights, shopping centres, bars and restaurants and the comments can be “derogatory or insulting”.

He admitted calling McGee “a prick” to one of his friends when he refused to change the music.

During the conversation with McGee, 34, he claimed the man swore at him, saying: “You are not putting no fucking music on here.”

Gerrard said a member of staff at the bar had given him permission to choose music from a CD player that his alleged victim was operating.

A card that controlled the music was snatched from his hand by McGee, he said.

“I couldn’t understand why the guy had such a problem with me, why he was so aggressive,” he said.

Gerrard said that when he went over to speak to McGee for a second time, he had no intention of having a fight but wanted to “smooth things over”.

Gerrard told the court he had a conviction for drink-driving when he was 19 but had not been in any other trouble with the police.

Gerrard welled up with tears as a statement from Liverpool legend Kenny

Dalglish was read out. Dalglish described Gerrard as “not the archetypal footballer. He does not like to move in movie star circles.”

He described him as “quiet” and “very private.” Despite his wealth, Dalglish said, Gerrard has “never forgotten his roots.”

“He is a very respectful man who has always behaved to senior players in a respectful way,” Dalglish said. “He is a very humble man.”

Dalglish, who had earlier met Gerrard on the night of the incident, said he had been with a group of boys who were “normal, polite, eating sushi and enjoying themselves”.

The footballer said Gerrard had become involved in his wife Marina’s charity for breast cancer and had been a guest of honour at a Hillsborough memorial match.

William Bygroves, the chaplain at Liverpool football club, said in a statement he had known Gerrard since he was a youth. “I have seen him mature into a kind, mature, generous, community minded family man.”

The chaplain said Gerrard had shown interest in those less fortunate than himself.

Bygroves said Gerrard was always generous when meeting children at Alder Hey children’s hospital and had worked on an anti-racism campaign with Gee Walker, the mother of murder victim Anthony Walker.

He described Gerrard as a warm-hearted genuine person.

Cross-examined by David Turner QC, for the prosecution, Gerrard was asked to show the jury how he hit McGee. He gently lifted his right arm to demonstrate the uppercut.

Asked by Turner if he was sickened by what he did, Gerrard replied: “I am certainly sorry.”

The jurors are expected to be sent out to consider their verdict tomorrow.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


FSA threat to stop bonus guarantees

Chief executive, Hector Sants reminds City firms that the regulator is determined to curb excessive pay policies to ensure effective risk management in the sector

City firms are being warned that guaranteeing bonuses for more than 12 months could encourage traders to take too much risk and breach the Financial Services Authority’s new code on remuneration.

Any guarantees made after 18 March, when the FSA published its consultation paper on pay deals, will have to be revoked if firms are to comply with the City regulator’s new code when it comes into force.

But the FSA admitted that the code, which was prompted by the taxpayer bailouts of the banking system last October and the asset protection scheme in January, will not come into effect until January – two months later than planned. The code is likely to be endorsed by the regulator’s board “shortly”, however.

In a letter to the bosses of Britain’s banks, FSA chief executive Hector Sants demands that firms send their remuneration policies to the regulator by the end of October so that their compliance with the code can be measured.

The 10 principles on pay in the FSA’s consultation paper would require firms to “establish, implement and maintain remuneration policies, procedures and practices that are consistent with and promote effective risk management”.

The regulator initially targeted pay alone but has widened its aim to wages, bonuses, long-term incentive plans, share options, hiring bonuses, severance packages and pension arrangements.

Sants tells the bank chief executives: “Although our board still needs to make a final determination, we envisage the FSA may adopt a rule along the lines originally proposed, together with updated supporting principles that take account of consultation responses, and that this will be effective from 1 January 2010.”

He adds: “In particular, I would draw your attention to the fact that guaranteed bonuses which run for a period of more than one year may be inconsistent with effective risk management.”

The new FSA regime will apply to any pay deal signed after its consultation began.

Sants said: “We are not proposing to extend ‘grandfathering’ arrangements to obligations entered into after publication of our consultation paper.”

Also, Sants warns: “It is essential that the market should not revert to remuneration practices that would be incompatible with our intended outcomes if the rule and code becomes effective next year.”

The FSA is planning to incorporate the code into its handbook, which allows it to levy fines for any lapses.

Sants, one of the first City figures to link the way bankers were paid with the onset of the financial crisis, reminds firms of the FSA’s “determination” to ensure that bankers’ remuneration does not promote excessive risk-taking.

Bonuses and the way the City pays its employees have been the subject of much debate since the credit crunch began to expose big pay cheques that were handed over for generating big profits that had quickly turned to enormous losses.

Sir David Walker’s report on bank pay, published last week, recommended that the remuneration of hundreds of bankers who received more than their bosses in the boardroom should be published.

The bankers would be allowed anonymity, however.

Walker also recommended that bonuses be delayed for between three and five years and put under scrutiny by a beefed-up remuneration committee.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Army pushes for more helicopters

The deployment of more helicopters to Afghanistan would save soldiers’ lives, the Chief of the Defence Staff, Sir Jock Stirrup, has said.

Following criticism of the government for failing to give troops air support, Sir Jock said more helicopters would "quite patently" prevent casualties.

The government insists that the military has never been so well resourced as it is at present.

Meanwhile, the 185th British death of the conflict has been confirmed.

A soldier from the 2nd Battalion The Rifles died in an explosion while on foot patrol near Gereshk in central Helmand, the Ministry of Defence said.

He was the 16th to die this month, as the Army continues an offensive aimed at increasing security ahead of Afghan elections planned for next month.

‘No panacea’

Prime Minister Gordon Brown spent 40 minutes with Sir Jock Stirrup on Friday morning.

Afterwards, Sir Jock told the BBC he was "busting a gut" to get more helicopters redeployed to Afghanistan.

"I have always said that there’s no such thing as enough helicopters in an operation campaign," he said.

"In a situation where you have lots of improvised explosive devices, the more you can increase your tactical flexibility by moving people by helicopter, then the more uncertain, more unpredictable your movements become to the enemy.

"Therefore, it is quite patently the case that you could save casualties by doing that."

He said operational commanders could always "do more and do things better" with extra helicopters, but acknowledged they were "no panacea".

His comments come after the head of the army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, said he was returning from Afghanistan with a "shopping list" of equipment to protect British troops from roadside bombs.

Sir Jock said he did not know how much this would cost, but said such things were non-discretionary and had to be provided.

BBC political correspondent Carole Walker said his remarks have intensified the pressure on the prime minister, who has insisted the government is providing the equipment and resources that are needed for the current operations.

‘Critical’

The prime minister’s spokesman said Sir Jock would go into further detail about equipment requirements in the future.

"Of course, we will take decisions in the light of that military advice," added the spokesman.

He said there would be a wider review of troop numbers, both at UK and Nato level, in the autumn.

"We will review the position on troops along with our allies after the election," he added.

The government has promised to consider demands for more equipment to protect UK forces in Afghanistan from roadside bombs.

The head of the British army, Gen Sir Richard Dannatt, says he was compiling a "shopping list" including surveillance and intelligence equipment.

More from Today programme

Soldier dies in Afghan explosion

Military doctor shortage warning

Downing Street says the PM will take decisions in "light of military advice" and review troop levels with allies.

Gen Dannatt, who steps down from his role next month, told the BBC it was "critical" to tackle the problem of improvised bombs.

Doing this required more coalition or Afghan personnel to build intelligence, better "overhead surveillance" of Taliban activity and greater technical ability to see where they were planting explosives, he said.

"That will be a shopping list that I’ll bring back," he added.

The BBC’s defence correspondent Caroline Wyatt said: "He’s talking about things like UAVs [or unmanned drones]… that could spot where the Taliban are laying bombs."

However, she said with government budgets shrinking it was unclear whether the Ministry of Defence would be given funding to meet these requests.

Business secretary Lord Mandelson said the general’s views on troops’ equipment requirements would be taken "very seriously".

"They will not go without whatever they need to carry out their very important operations in Afghanistan," he said.

Gen Dannatt had said that, despite reports, the military never made a direct request for 2,000 extra personnel.

But he warned that reducing numbers to 8,300 would be wrong and that Nato might ask for more personnel for a 12 to 18-month period.

Conservative leader David Cameron said the government must listen to military commanders.

"The prime minister has been telling us all week that they have got enough helicopters and actually now we know they don’t," he said.

He refused to say whether his party would spend more on defence if it was in government, claiming it was about "commitment" rather than funding.

With commitment, he said, six Chinook helicopters which had been grounded by computer problems since their purchase at a cost of £250m eight years ago could have been in action.

Earlier, shadow defence secretary Dr Liam Fox had said it was "extremely likely" that a Tory government would agree to a request for more British troops in the short term.


What are your experiences of the equipment used by the British military in the field Are you satisfied that the kit is up to date and fit for purpose Send us your stories using the form below.

<p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Bankers could be forced to reveal pay

Hundreds of City high-flyers could have their remuneration details published – but opposition MPs are critical

Plans to reveal the pay and bonuses of City high flyers in a new voluntary code came under attack from opposition MPs, who said the guidelines would be ignored unless they were enshrined in regulation and policed by the main financial watchdog.

A government-backed review recommended that some of the best-paid bank staff, who are currently shielded from scrutiny, should be included in annual reports as part of a wide range of measures designed to discourage risky behaviour.

The review by former investment bank boss Sir David Walker argued that exposing pay structures for highly paid staff in the City and putting an end to short-term bonuses would help prevent a repeat of the financial crisis.

Bonuses would be delayed for between three and five years and put under scrutiny by a beefed-up remuneration committee. Non-executive directors of finance companies would be required to spend more time assessing deals put forward by executive directors, Walker said.

But the report’s reliance on non-executive directors and shareholders to monitor a voluntary code was branded “inadequate” by Liberal Democrat treasury spokesman Vince Cable, who said banks should be instructed to observe the new rules by the Financial Services Authority.

Cable said: “It is clear that in banks like RBS the demigod status granted to Fred Goodwin prevented any form of credible scrutiny. So the news that bank boards may be forced to show that they can challenge a chief executive is a belated but welcome step in the right direction. But if the Walker approach is to have any value then it has to be obligatory through the FSA and not just on a voluntary basis.”

Sources close to several banks said there was a general acceptance that the Walker rules would be endorsed by the government in time for details of staff pay to appear in next year’s annual reports. According to City sources, one high street bank paid more than 200 staff more than its chief executive. Walker said he wanted the rules to apply to all banks operating in the City, including the largest US banks.

The review will reach chancellor Alistair Darling at a time when several banks have begun setting aside massive bonuses. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan have reported record profits for the first half of the year.

Several MPs, already concerned at the massive taxpayer funds used to bail out Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group, have signed an early day motion signalling their concern at the return of huge bonuses at City institutions.

Independent MP Dai Davies sponsored the motion, which urged a rethink at Goldman Sachs. The Wall Street bank could be in a position to offer total pay and bonuses of more than $22bn (£13.3bn), equating to an average payout of $770,000 to each of its 29,400 employees. The motion said it believes “such obscene profits are made by encouraging the very reckless risk-taking that brought down or severely damaged several major banks, and run counter to the restraint urged by the chancellor.”

Goldman, RBS and other banks operating in the UK argue they have overhauled their bonus structures with a greater emphasis on long-term rewards, but continue to face criticism that both the size and structure of their bonuses encourages risky behaviour.

Walker said the pay of individual staff below board level who earn large sums would be revealed in the form of pay bands in the annual report, though names would be kept secret. The remuneration committee would have the power to overrule the board if it believed the level of pay or bonuses encouraged risky behaviour.

He also said the role of non-executive directors should be strengthened to make up for the failures of banks prior to the credit crisis. A risk committee at board level would also oversee the policies of the bank and assess whether they could undermine its strength.

Walker said: “These proposals are designed to improve the professionalism and diligence of bank boards, increasing the importance of challenge in the board environment. If this means that boards operate in a somewhat less collegial way than in the past, that will be a small price to pay for better governance.”

His proposals include:

• Board-level risk committees chaired by a non-executive director.

• Risk committees to have power to scrutinise, and if necessary block, big transactions.

• More power for remuneration committees to scrutinise company-wide pay.

• Remuneration committees to oversee pay of highly paid executives not on the board.

• Significant deferred element in bonus schemes for all highly paid executives.

• Increased public disclosure about the pay of such executives.

• Chair of remuneration committee to face re-election if his or her report gets less than 75% approval.

Walker said that while shareholders largely encouraged risk-taking by banks, they would need to take in the future a more active role in restraining banks such activity.

“Failures in governance in banks and other financial institutions made the financial crisis much worse. Many boards inadequately understood the type and scale of risks they were running and failed to hold the executive to high standards of sustainable performance. Bonus schemes contributed to excessive risk-taking by rewarding short-term performance. And shareholders failed to exercise proper stewardship,” he said.

“Taken alongside the arrangements being proposed by the FSA, the recommendations on remuneration are as tough or tougher than anything to be found elsewhere in the world. An important and urgent challenge is to promote adoption of similar approaches internationally.

“These recommendations should bring substantial improvement in the governance of banks. They will not guarantee that failure will be avoided in future but will greatly mitigate the risk.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



Rebecca Walker: The Untouchable Michael Jackson

We use his death, as we used his life, as a mirror. There is no room for Michael. It is still, tragically, all about us.

Pledge time

G8 leaders at their L'Aquila summit

The G8 summit in Italy has closed with world leaders pledging $20bn to help boost food supplies in the developing world.

There were also agreements among both developed and developing nations that global temperatures must not be allowed to rise to dangerous levels.

BBC correspondents at the G8 give their analysis on the main developments. Follow the links below to jump directly to their analysis.

Bridget Kendall on the G8

James Robbins on the environment

Andrew Walker on development

BRIDGET KENDALL ON THE G8 CONCEPT

Bridget Kendall

Low expectations can be an advantage. The G8 has had much bad press in recent years, and the emergence of the other "Gs", as President Obama called them – groupings of G20, G5 and G14 – had threatened to undermine its exclusivity.

What was the point of a G8 club, many were beginning to ask, which was too narrowly-based to tackle today’s global problems and when it did reach a deal, never seemed able to live up to its own promises

At first glance, this year’s gathering did seem more consensual than it has been for some time. But on broader diplomatic questions, the sands soon began shifting.

The American and Russian presidents both arrived, basking in the warm glow of what appeared to be a ground-breaking summit in Moscow, crowned by a deal to get back to a new round of nuclear arms cuts.

But in his final G8 press conference President Medvedev sounded a chilly note: Russian missiles could still be re-targeted to point at Europe, he warned, if President Obama did not cancel plans for that controversial missile shield in Europe.

So much for G8 consensus building…

In the end, it seemed as though the main purpose of this summit was simply to take stock before the next global round of meetings. President Obama publicly warned Iran it had until the next G20 summit – due in September – to respond to an appeal to suspend its nuclear programme.

Many leaders invoked the Copenhagen meeting in December as the real deadline when it came to a proper global deal on tackling climate change.

So has the G8 had its day President Obama seemed to hint as much, ruefully complaining there had been far too many summits already in the six months he had been in office.

But it is much harder to dismantle clubs than it is to invent new ones. The Canadians are already preparing for next year’s event. And the French the year after. So watch this space… and see you again next year.

Return to top

JAMES ROBBINS ON CLIMATE CHANGE

James Robbins

Few people expected a decisive breakthrough on climate change at this summit. President Obama pointed out at the end of proceedings that the G8 was never really the right forum for that.

Nevertheless, the meeting of the major economies forum he chaired did bring a greater meeting of minds and of joint political will than we have ever seen previously.

The historic polluters – the industrialised countries who make up the Group of 8 – were able to join with the emerging economic giants in a shared acceptance that global warming must be limited to a maximum temperature rise of 2C.

That could not have been taken for granted before all those leaders came to Italy.

It helps bind India and China, in particular, into a process of restricting emissions of greenhouse gases – a process to which they have previously been highly resistant or even downright hostile.

The US, under the new management of Barack Obama, has moved a long way too. His commitment to aim for emissions cuts of a whopping 80% by 2050, alongside the other G8 countries, does have its flaws.

But it is a very big target, even if it is so far in the distance that it is quite hard to judge if really tough decisions will be made now to make deep cuts by 2020. That’s what the UN scientists insist is necessary.

The failure to agree an interim target for 2020 provoked the UN Secretary General into unusually harsh criticism. Ban Ki-moon told me at this summit that the G8 leaders of the rich world were failing to shoulder their "historical responsibilities".

No wonder everyone agrees that it is going to be a very hard road indeed towards Copenhagen and the December UN summit meant to produce a new and binding global treaty.

Return to top

ANDREW WALKER ON DEVELOPMENT

Andrew Walker

The final day of the summit was dominated by food, and a new approach to tackling hunger. It involves less emphasis on food aid and more on promoting the development of agriculture.

And there is money on the table to fund the strategy – $20bn. Campaigners here generally welcomed the basic idea, but have reservations about whether the money being offered is enough and whether it is genuinely new.

The big concern they always have whenever the G8 offers aid for something is whether the money will be diverted from other development programmes.

Most say that in the immediate aftermath of the news, they don’t know. But they will be poring over the figures to see if they can work it out.

On the overall aid budget there was a great deal of criticism of some G8 countries ahead of the summit for falling behind on commitments they made at Gleneagles in 2005. Max Lawson of Oxfam says that European G8 countries made the biggest promises. But apart from the UK, he says, they are not on track to implement the aid increases they said they would by 2010.

One of the communiques issued at this summit reiterates the importance of the Gleneagles commitments. But campaigners say some G8 countries are almost certain to fall short.

Return to top
</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Sun Spin:Creedence Clearwater Revival

A CRY FROM THE STREETS AS THE SIXTIES TURNED TO THE SEVENTIES

Throughout the remainder of 2009, Sunday Spin will regularly celebrate and explore some of the seminal albums released in 1969 as they reach their 40th anniversaries. We couldn’t think of a better slab to start withÂ…

Some folks are born wise, and John Fogerty is surely one of them. Two years on from the Summer of Love, Fogerty could see which way the wind was blowing, his young ears able to “hear the voice of rage and ruin.” The Vietnam War shuddered a half a world away, entering U.S. living rooms every night on the news, while corporate culture had already absorbed the trappings of the ’60s youth revolution, diluting a legitimate social movement into a series of largely empty, marketable symbols (“”Is that a real poncho? I mean is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?”). Fogerty picked up on this sharp dip in general hope, addressing the nostalgia already settling into America’s mindset – not just for some fictitious bygone time but for what had transpired only recently – a dynamic that persists in even more pronounced form today. The first words of Creedence Clearwater Revival‘s third album, Green River are, “Well, take me back down where cool water flows/ Let me remember things I love.” From there he swiftly introduces us to the hangman’s rope and announces, “You’re gonna find the world is smould’rin’.”

CCR’s second album in a year that would ultimately see them release three classics is a sharp shock to the system. For all of its ’50s inspired bounce, the waters in their river are cloudy and tangled with weeds and bodies. Like the bluesmen and folk heroes that fueled Fogerty’s pen, his songs here invite mindless sing-alongs, seeming jubilant yet ever-touched by something far darker. The quintessential example in the Creedence catalog is “Bad Moon Rising, ” which has been reduced to a backdrop for film and television, just another piece of the general cultural landscape, but is nothing less than a scathing gospel warning, barking, “Hope you got your things together/ Hope you are quite prepared to die/ Looks like we’re in for nasty weather/ One eye is taken for an eye.” Creedence isn’t screwing around on this album, and as baldly enjoyable as the music is (and it is a freakin’ ball that’ll have you smacking the ceiling of your hoopdie like El Duderino) this is largely serious business, as heavy and truthful as Robert Johnson, Leadbelly or Bob Dylan.

It does not hurt that the band is ablaze on every cut. The myth goes that this is John’s show and the rest are merely players, but no matter the brilliance of the playwright you’re going to have an empty house if there’s no one there to execute the script. Stu Cook (bass), Doug Clifford (drums) and John’s brother Tom Fogerty (rhythm guitar) are jook joint mean and Hamburg underground tight, a party band extraordinaire with steam rising from their pores. John Fogerty’s lead guitar and ruthless lead vocals are indeed the sharp point of their phalanx but the muscle behind it comes from Tom, Stu and Doug. The sad evidence of this is how none of them ever again achieved a fraction of the mojo harnessed during CCR’s five-year existence. Green River presents the combo at their most cohesive, where each aspect feeds the others to create one of the most appealing, robust sounds in the history of rock. The conversation between instruments generates a density and immediacy that defies age – a model for anyone seeking a “timeless” quality to their music.

And oh what tunes! The proto-punk of “Commotion,” the bent knee cry for connectivity in “Wrote A Song For Everyone,” the gleeful foreboding of “Tombstone Shadow,” the ennui and impotence of “Lodi,” the urge for going inside “Cross-Tie Walker” and the shiver-inducing prognostication of “Bad Moon Rising” and “Sinister Purpose” – each number a lustily attacked marvel that culminates in a “Fuck it, let’s party” vibe with a cover of jump blues standard “The Night Time Is The Right Time.” Throwing jagged stones at “pharaohs” and the self-deluded, this song cycle is simultaneously delightful and harrowing. In sequencing, execution and insight, Green River is a tough one to beat in any era, even one as rich as the late 1960s.

Track Listing

Side One
1. Green River
2. Commotion
3. Tombstone Shadow
4. Wrote a Song for Everyone

Side Two
1. Bad Moon Rising
2. Lodi
3. Cross-Tie Walker
4. Sinister Purpose
5. The Night Time Is the Right Time

Do yourself a favor and check out Letters to Fogerty by the wonderful John Moe. You can thank us later when you stop laughing.

This nasty lil’ tune nicely captures the hurly-burly of modern life in under three minutes.

Death songs have a long, grand tradition and this is up there with the best of them.

During their 1999 tour this was a Pavement staple, just one example of this album’s far reaching influence.

Here’s John Fogerty getting “stuck” all by his lonesome.

A clearly stoned Mama Cass introduces “Clarence Clamwater.” JamBase would like to dedicate this one to our pal Nathan Moore (he knows why…). Play it loud and long as we all try to find our way back to the river.

And lastly, the title tune.