RSS Feed     Twitter     Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Women’

Rick Sanchez Meets With The ‘Wisest Of All Latina Women’ (VIDEO)

On the third day of Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing, the ‘Wise Latina’ meme pressed on. On CNN, Rick Sanchez even went to talk to some of these magical creatures. As Wolf Blitzer put it: “Rick Sanchez is joining us now from Flor…

Woman who gave birth through IVF at 66 dies

• Carmen Bousada lied to clinic to obtain treatment
• Case shows need for age limit for IVF, say experts

A Spanish woman who became the world’s oldest mother at the age of 66 has died of cancer just two-and-a-half years after giving birth to twins, raising fresh questions about the ethics of fertility treatment for women past natural childbearing age.

Maria del Carmen Bousada, a single mother and retired sales assistant from Cádiz, southern Spain, leaves behind her orphan sons, Pau and Christian. It was unclear who would look after them.

Bousada, who had reportedly been diagnosed with a tumour just a few months after the birth in December 2006, had been living with her sons in a one-bedroom apartment and was being helped by her brother and sister-in-law, who are both in their 70s. They lived off the €600 (£515) she received for her pension and from child benefit payments. Her brother, Ricardo Bousada, reportedly said he had sold the rights to her story to a television company and that the proceeds would go towards raising the children.

Bousada became pregnant after repeated visits to a fertility clinic in Los Angeles, where she lied about her age. She told the Pacific Fertility Clinic that she was 55, the cut-off age. Bousada sold her apartment to pay for the treatment, which she did not start until her own mother, for whom she cared, had died.

An 18-year-old girl provided the egg and an Italian-American sperm donor provided the sperm so that, after hormone treatment to reverse menopause, an embryo could be implanted in her uterus.

“I picked them from photos in a catalogue,” she said of the donors. “It was a bit like studying an estate agent’s brochure and choosing a house.”

After a difficult pregnancy the twins were born by caesarean section at a clinic in Barcelona, eastern Spain, a week before her 67th birthday. Shortly after giving birth Bousada told the News of the World that she hoped to live until she was 101, like her mother. “Everyone has to have children at the right time for them. This was the right time for me. It was something I always dreamed of,” she said.

“No one at home knew what I was doing,” she added. “I told a few girlfriends that I loved the idea of having a baby, but none of them took me seriously. They thought it was impossible.”

The clinic’s director, Vicken Sahakian, had already expressed disappointment that Bousada falsified records. He said: “I figured something might happen and wind up being a disaster for these kids, and unfortunately I was right.”

Regulations for IVF vary greatly around the world and even within Europe, despite EU measures to unify safety standards for donated eggs and sperm. In the UK, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) sets no age limit on fertility treatment but doctors are obliged by law to consider the future welfare of any child, which in practice rules out mothers in their 60s. Since Bousada gave birth, two women in India who doctors said were aged 70 have had children following fertility treatment, both last year.

Prof William Ledger, head of the reproductive and developmental medicine unit at Sheffield University medical school and a member of the HFEA, said he believed cases like Bousada’s might provide the impetus for closer controls.

“It’s a shame that policy often comes from these individual tragedies. It’s a very, very sad story,” he said. “What’s good about regulation in the UK is that we put the welfare of the child at the centre. There are many reasons to have misgivings about mothers so old, and I think this case has shown that we are right.”

A 66-year-old new mother was “clearly pushing the boundaries of what nature intended”, said Tony Rutherford, chairman of the British Fertility Society.

His own clinic, in Leeds, would not accept women for treatment who were over 45 as the chances of success with IVF were so small at that age, he said.

“Much beyond that, if someone gives birth you’re effectively asking them to cope with a teenager, and all the problems that potentially comes with, when they’re well into their 60s. This raises very serious questions.”

Josephine Quintavalle from the Comment on Reproductive Ethics, a pro-life pressure group which campaigns on IVF issues in the UK, said the primary problem was a general unwillingness to accept the limits of ageing when it came to parenthood.

“We get older, it’s the human condition, accept it. Move on to the next stage of life and live it to the full, but don’t expect to be able to have children at any cost,” she said. “If a woman in her late 60s announced she was going to go and play at Wimbledon she would be laughed at. Yet for some reason, when a woman of the same age decides she want to be a mother it’s OK.”

Bousada herself, who had never been married, told the News of the World that her family would look after the boys if she died. “They will never be alone,” she said. “There are lots of young people in our family.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Martha St Jean: Women, Work, Jobs and Advice: A Talk with Janet Hanson

In conversation number two with 10 women who are changing the world and rocking their fields, I bring you Janet Hanson.

IOC statement about court decision on women ski jumping

While we are pleased that the Games can now proceed as planned, we strongly disagree with the court’s analysis that the IOC acted in a discriminatory manner. As previously explained, our decision was based on technical issues, without regard to gender.
The IOC will continue to follow the development of women’s ski jumping and remains open to considering its possible inclusion in the Sochi Games in 2014. We understand and appreciate how important inclusion is to the dedicated athletes who participate in the sport.

 

We also welcome the court’s recognition that that “the IOC in recent years has supported the inclusion of women in the Olympics and in amateur sports." and the observation that, “The IOC has implemented a wide range of initiatives to increase women’s involvement in leadership and administration within the Olympic movement and the wider sporting community."

 

The judgment goes on to say, “VANOC points out that these are not empty words or empty policies; women now compete in approximately 48% of the events at the Winter Olympics and the percentage of female athletes has steadily increased to just over 40%” (quote from pages 34-35 of court decision)

 

 
###
For further information, please contact the IOC Communications Department, Tel: +41 21 621 60 00, email: pressoffice@olympic.org

IOC statement about court decision on women ski jumping

While we are pleased that the Games can now proceed as planned, we strongly disagree with the court’s analysis that the IOC acted in a discriminatory manner. As previously explained, our decision was based on technical issues, without regard to gender.
 
The IOC will continue to follow the development of women’s ski jumping and remains open to considering its possible inclusion in the Sochi Games in 2014. We understand and appreciate how important inclusion is to the dedicated athletes who participate in the sport.

 

We also welcome the court’s recognition that that “the IOC in recent years has supported the inclusion of women in the Olympics and in amateur sports." and the observation that, “The IOC has implemented a wide range of initiatives to increase women’s involvement in leadership and administration within the Olympic movement and the wider sporting community."

 

The judgment goes on to say, “VANOC points out that these are not empty words or empty policies; women now compete in approximately 48% of the events at the Winter Olympics and the percentage of female athletes has steadily increased to just over 40%” (quote from pages 34-35 of court decision)

 

Rethink Afghanistan: Debunking the Myths About Women’s Rights in Afghanistan

Afghan women continue to face horrific violence, despite one of the oft-stated goals of this war. And yet proponents of the war continue to use…

Women Who Tech

As new media continues to be an amplifying platform for previously under-recognized constituencies and agendas, women are looking to claim their piece of the pie….

Fixing The Economy Is Women’s Work

While the pinstripe crowd fixates on troubled assets, a stalled stimulus and mortgage remedies, it turns out that a more sure-fire financial fix is within our grasp — and has been for years. New research says a healthy dose of estrogen may be…

Women’s Iconic Swimsuit Movie Moments: Which Is Hottest? (PHOTOS, POLL)

Some bikinis aren’t made for swimming (see Raquel Welch in fur or Ali Larter in whipped cream), and sometimes swimming doesn’t require a swimsuit at all.

See iconic MALE movie swimsuit moments here

But check out these leading ladies in thei…

Women In Business Continues Growth

Women entrepreneurs are increasingly growing their ranks in the world of small business. Today women business owners are a significant part of the small business world. And now more than ever, women entrepreneurs aren’t just starting a business, they’re doing a great job staying in business.
Today there are more than 10 million privately-held women-owned businesses [...]

A certain age

Red alert on the heath: a flasher has been spotted twice, lurking in the woods. He wore a white vest and blue shorts, took them all off, flashed at two different women and put them back on again. What an odd thing to do. But it gave everyone a fright, the police were called and, worse still, he was in my favourite bit of the woods. I’ve now weedily changed my route, because that’s not what I want to see before breakfast.

I haven’t seen a flasher for decades, but in my youth I saw droves of them – any time, anywhere, in various colours, shapes, sizes and conditions, on the tube, in the parks, swimming pools, cul-de-sacs – and they seemed to be homing in on me.

I began to feel rather persecuted. I’m sure the chap with his trousers round his ankles at the dark end of the platform was the bloke who sold fruit and veg in the market. No more shopping from his stall. And I always screamed. Completely wrong. Apparently one should remain calm, which spoils the flasher’s fun.

During this stressful period, I moaned at a male chum about the sightings, but he was unsympathetic. Not that he would dream of waving his about in public at strangers, but to him it was a harmless bit of his body which he handled every day and was rather fond of, yet the minute he showed it to a girlfriend, odds on she would scream or recoil, as if at a poisonous snake. It struck terror into her heart. He could never quite work out why.

Perhaps some of us do rather over-react. I once heard of a group of fierce women who trained their dogs to attack men, when necessary, at the flashpoint. They got an obliging fellow to act in a menacing way, with a piece of steak strategically tied to his person, until the dogs got the hang of it. But I think that’s going a bit too far, don’t you? And anyway, my dog wears a muzzle, which would be no good to me in the woods.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Sex sells to women too

Black Lace had a reputation for producing edgy, well-written erotica for women. The demand is there, so why is it closing?

The suspension of Black Lace, the UK erotica imprint “by women, for women”, brings to an end 16 years of female-penned smut due to “declining sales”. Sex sells – but apparently not to women.

As authors, we’re dismayed. In erotic fiction, you’ll probably find truer expressions of female desire than in the popular memoirs from strippers and sex workers, whose job it is to please men. But we’re also unsurprised. Women’s erotic fiction authors are often regarded as randy Barbara Cartlands writing purple porn for the sex-starved, their prose replete with throbbing manhoods, dungeon dynamics and swoon-inducing bastards: “Mills and Bonk”.

But in the last 16 years, Black Lace has acquired a strong reputation for producing edgy, well-written erotica. When readers get past their prejudices, they’re often very pleased to see us.

The internet has also transformed erotica. Women who felt uncomfortable purchasing dirty books in person can now buy at their blush-free leisure. But the wide availability of free content online has led many to conclude books can’t compete. Many authors have felt, in the face of this, the imprint’s marketing and brand-identity have been neglected, that the line has released too many reprints, or that its women-only author policy is outmoded.

With every industry feeling the pinch, many will view Black Lace’s fall as inevitable. But it has recently felt as if the genre was on the cusp of mainstream acceptance. Magazines such as Scarlet and Filament are targeting women with sexy words and pictures. The high sales of Kathy Lette’s In Bed With… collection of anonymous erotica, suggests woman are eager to read clit-lit. Sex memoirs are popular in the US; erotica, in particular, erotic romance, sells massively, with ebooks flying off the digital shelves. Why not over here? Are we just too British? Are the books not reaching the consumer? Is there something unseemly about our fiction? When it comes to genre credibilty, it often feels we’re in the gutter, looking up at the sci-fi writers.

Rival UK erotica publisher, Xcite, look set to gain new ground in the space vacated by Black Lace. Alas for BL authors, Xcite is short story led and novel-length manuscripts may struggle to find a home. Several popular BL authors already writing erotic romance are likely to flourish with American publishers instead. However, some fear they won’t fit in. Is there still a problem of double standards? After all, when Black Lace began many commentators refused to believe the authors of these books could be women.

With more investment the Black Lace story could have ended happily. For a line of groundbreaking women’s fiction to vanish – after that broken ground was so hard won – is a tragedy. When Random House bought Virgin Books, owners of Black Lace, they declared erotica “the jewel in the crown” – a tiny, insignificant jewel, it seems, which can be picked off their conglomerate crown and flicked away.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Are men a new market for Tampax?

Over the years, advertisers of sanitary protection have tried, repeatedly, to convince us that a woman’s period is a glorious time. A hallowed time. A time to ice skate, bungee jump and rollerblade. A time to leak blue liquid and listen to soft rock. And a time when we feel compelled to wear our tightest, whitest shorts.

Such ads obviously do nothing to prepare girls for the painful reality, so it’s interesting to see a different approach. Over the past few months, a viral campaign has been running online – complete with blog, videos and Twitter feed – which features no bungee jumping at all. It also stars a man. Well, a 16-year-old boy anyway. And one day said boy, Zack, wakes up with a vagina.

The campaign follows his struggle to cope. In some ways, it pops with sexist stereotypes: he starts baking brownies, eating yoghurt and snapping at his best friend, Bryan. Overall though, the story unfolds skilfully, exploring what it’s really like to have your first period, including the shock of cramps and water retention. Zack invites commenters to write about when they had their first period, opening up a public discussion that’s rarely mooted. And it’s only towards the end of the video sequence that he’s shown using a Tampax slot machine.

The campaign is intriguing partly because it’s so difficult to tell who Tampax is targeting. Is it young women in general? (Zack is good looking.) Is it female athletes? (As a footballer, Zack asks sporty women how they cope with their periods.) Or could it be men? Are they the secret, untapped market for sanitary products? Would Tampax sales shoot up if they could convince bashful blokes to buy tampons for their girlfriends? So many questions.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Ask Hadley: Coloured jeans

Hadley Freeman can ease your fashion pain

What are your thoughts on coloured jeans for women?

Michelle, by email

I have many thoughts on the matter, none of which are wholly complimentary, In fact, I’d say they are entirely uncomplimentary. Orange? On your legs? Really? Did you intend to do that or did you just spill a family-sized bottle of Orangina down your thighs?

I know that such scepticism is showing my age worse than the concealer crumbling into my crow’s-feet because, as your question insinuates, colourful jeans are what all the cool kids are wearing these days. But listen up, cool kids: when I was a youngster, we had a name for people who wore red trousers. We called them clowns. Ooh, I think I just pulled a Werther’s Original out of my pocket.

I do feel a bit guilty about this sneering, not merely out of selfish vanity (ie, it’s making me look old), but also out of selfless love, because I actually quite like the store behind this colourful denim madness, and that store is Uniqlo.

Y’all know what Uniqlo is because it has spread through this country with the vehemence of swine flu paranoia, if not actually swine flu itself. One minute you had never heard of it, the next it became part of the M&S-Tesco-WH Smiths-Boots-Waterstone’s scaffolding that makes up this country’s high streets. I bought a rather fetching pair of Uniqlo cropped jeans the other day for a mere £15 and I’m pretty sure I can’t hear the screams of Chinese children as I pull them on in the morning.

However … furnishing me with a pair of cropped jeans is no excuse for encouraging the soft and susceptible minds of this country’s youths to wear bright green denim upon their legs. Green legs? What are you, a cricket?

Dear readers, there is nothing wrong with branching out to stand out (ooh, that was kinda catchy, wasn’t it? Perhaps only 1980s advertising executives appreciated it). But the person who buys into this nonsense not only isn’t branching out (because everyone is doing it, they are merely following the high-street trend, like a Technicolor sheep), they are therefore not standing out, either. The only thing they are doing is committing violence to my eyeballs.

Even worse, Uniqlo has now hired to star in its advertising campaign the one thing that is perhaps more ubiquitous on this planet than coloured denim: come on down, Agyness Deyn! (Alexa Chung must have been too busy being photographed at another fashion party. Amazing that she has time to change her penny loafers with such a hectic schedule, don’t you think?)

Even aside from their shared ubiquity, it is a pairing that makes sense in that a) both the trend and the model seem to have confused “being fashionable” with “being wacky – wheeeee!”; b) they both baffle me.

And now, not only are people wearing coloured jeans, they are wearing them, Agyness-style, with a trilby, a man’s blazer, spats and probably jigging their legs about, like marionettes.

Sticking with this Hornby-esque list technique, here are some handy tips on how y’all can stand out without having to wear orange on your legs:

1. Don’t wear jeans.

2. Don’t wear anything the mannequins are wearing in the front window of a high-street shop.

3. Don’t wear anything worn by a celebrity, especially if you don’t understand why that celebrity is famous.

No applause, just monetary expressions of gratitude, please.

I recently spotted a pair of floral leggings in Topshop. Am I, a thirtysomething woman, now officially too old for Topshop?

Charlotte, London

Charlotte, you seem to see floral leggings as redolent of Daisy Lowe-style youthful fashion; I see them as something my grandmother’s bridge-playing friends might have sported in Miami. But fashion, of course, is subjective, so let’s focus on the bigger picture of your question and that is of the age limit of Topshop and fashion age limits in general.

In regards to the former, the whole Topshop experience has always been largely based on wheat and chaff and sorting the former from the latter. As one gets older, more sorting is required, not because you are too old to wear certain things, but because you are too wise to do so.

But leaving that aside, this page hates hates HATES this idea of people being too old to wear certain things, as though clothes are films with age-specific certificates, but in reverse. Did I mention that I hate them? It is just another way to make women feel bad about not weighing eight stone and being 21 years old. And the fact that the D*i*y M*i* actually has a column on its fashion pages called “Am I Too Old to …” proves how stupid it is. In fact, upsetting people at that so-called newspaper is actually a pretty good reason to wear a rah-rah skirt. I am woman. Hear me rah.

• Post questions to Hadley Freeman, Ask Hadley, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London, N1 9GU. Email: ask.hadley@guardian.co.uk

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


The showbiz writer who went to war

Jane Bussmann used to pen facile interviews with Hollywood starlets. Then she decided to cover genocide in Africa. Why? She had a crush on a peace envoy, she tells Patrick Barkham

A comic novel about child soldiers is a difficult concept to grasp, particularly when it is written by a showbiz journalist based in Hollywood who travelled to Africa because she had a crush on an American peace negotiator. The Worst Date Ever, the true story of the last six years of Jane Bussmann’s life, is part romcom, part celebrity satire and part excoriating account of the failure to apprehend Joseph Kony, the Ugandan terrorist who has led his army of child soldiers on a 20-year campaign of hostage-taking, exploitation and murder in east Africa.

“I’m not laughing at sex slaves, I’m laughing at our excuses for not saving them,” says Bussmann, when we meet. A petite woman who looks like she could be Tracey Emin’s younger sister, she rattles out sentences peppered with expletives and dry one-liners. “It’s a book about me thinking I’ve got to change my life, with catastrophic consequences, and also the silliness of chasing a bloke you are never in a million years going to cop off with.” She calls it method writing: “You get way funnier shit in real life than you ever do in fiction.”

Bussmann became a showbiz journalist by accident. She grew up in Muswell Hill, north London, wanting to be a physicist. “Space travel seemed awesome and I remember Look and Learn books where we all wore jumpsuits to work,” she says. The future appeared perfect: “I could be really fat and wear a jumpsuit and live off pills. What could I do in this world of jumpsuits and pills? I’d probably just work on time travel. But that didn’t materialise due to the enormous quantities of booze I consumed after 16.”

Physics was supplanted by rebellion and the only A-level Bussmann picked up was in art. She was then inspired to write sitcoms by meeting Johnny Speight, the screenwriter who created Alf Garnett, when her journalist father interviewed him for the Guardian. For a decade, she scratched around the alternative comedy scene, writing for The Day Today, Brass Eye and So Graham Norton and creating a flurry of edgy sitcom ideas – about two rabbits being drafted into war and chainsmoking mums – which tended not to get made.

After moving to Hollywood to pursue her screenwriting career, she was forced to write about celebrities for women’s magazines to pay her bills. With her love of, as she puts it, booze, blasphemy and bad-taste jokes, she was spectacularly ill-suited to LA. “I can never make up my mind if LA is a really bitchy girls’ public school in which everyone is foul to each other all day long and constantly on a diet, or Jane Austen’s England where you can make a terrible social faux pas at any time but with longer life expectancy so this shit goes on for 70 years instead of 40,” she says.

It was the George Bush boom years and California was basking in “the golden age of stupid”. She would arrange an interview with Britney Spears, her entourage would cancel it, and Bussmann would have to concoct a story about how grounded and healthy Spears was when she was actually, at that time, a chaotic mess. The only good celebrities she met were Dolly Parton (“When you talk to her, you believe everything is going to be all right,” says Bussmann. “You just want to sit on her knee and your eyes are being sucked down into this valley of tits”) and Marilyn Manson (“You swoon when you interview him because he’s so gracious and funny”).

So she loyally lied about her celebrity subjects, indulging their opinions on chihuahuas and religion, until she interviewed Ashton Kutcher around the time he got together with Demi Moore. The interview was published with fictional quotes inserted by an editor, Kutcher and his lawyers went nuclear and Bussmann, who denied inventing the quotes, figured that now that she was hated by both her celebrity subjects and her journalist paymasters, she had better escape.

When she spotted a picture of John Prendergast, a US conflict negotiator who specialised in African affairs and sought to help end the conflict in Uganda, she fantasised about a route out. Prendergast “wasn’t just hot; he was wise,” she wrote. She fancied him, and as her “only job skill was turning people into celebrities” she decided to travel to Uganda to meet Prendergast and write a profile of him as the pin-up boy of peace, the George Clooney of conflict resolution.

She blagged a commission from the Sunday Times and travelled to a remote town in Uganda, only to find that Prendergast had dashed off again. Funny, excruciating and utterly exhausting, her book tells of her desperate blundering around Uganda, being spied on and befriended, and her gradual discovery of the evil surrounding Kony and his Lord’s Resistance Army.

She has a keen eye for detail, from the marbled-wash jeans on sale in the markets to the “purposeful white people dotted everywhere” who drive self-important white Toyotas with UNHCR or UNESCO on the side, “the international acronyms for don’t shoot”, and her experiences expose some uncomfortable parallels between celebrity journalism and the life of a foreign correspondent. In both Uganda and Hollywood, people in power try to bludgeon journalists into accepting their twisted versions of the truth. In both worlds, Bussmann has her reality tested daily by bullies.

Her self-deprecating descriptions of her cluelessness might, however, suggest that any idiot can become a foreign correspondent. Can anyone really pitch up overseas and uncover complex stories of violence and corruption? “A real reporter could have done it in slightly less than six years and maybe covered another couple of wars in the meantime. They could have also done it without dropping Biros on the floor with your shirt undone and whatever desperate tricks I used to get close up to colonels,” she says.

She was spurred on by guilt, because when she met children in camps who had been rescued from Kony’s army, she “very foolishly” promised them she would help, “something a real reporter would never do in a million years”, she says.

While the camps of terrified and disorientated Ugandans displaced by the fighting in the north of their country are emptying today, Kony is still a wanted man, holed up in a remote corner of the Democratic Republic of Congo and continuing to commit atrocities with his army of young conscripts and hostages.

Between the one-liners, Bussmann argues that Kony is the “perfect villain” who helped his opponents in the Ugandan government attract foreign aid while some in the army enriched themselves. “The fact that an army of 40,000 couldn’t catch one man and a bunch of kids, who at the beginning just had machetes, is highly suspicious,” she says. “Look at the ghost soldiers. This is an army that according to the [Ugandan] government newspaper have up to 60% of soldiers in certain units missing because they never existed. Corrupt bosses were claiming salaries for soldiers who didn’t exist. I don’t know much about ghosts but I know they are fucking shit at catching child kidnappers. They are right up there with werewolves, they are unreliable and useless.”

Bussmann is scathing about ineffective international efforts to stop Kony and badly targeted aid money that has poured into Uganda. For many years the west assisted the country’s long-serving president, Yoweri Museveni, and elevated him into a golden boy “when for 10 years he’s had these people living in camps and hasn’t been able to catch this one guy for 20 years,” she says. “Look at Hillary Clinton’s [1998] comment, ‘There are no easy answers.’ One nun rescued 109 girls [from Kony] and the Ugandan army rescued one. There are some easy answers. The army is bent.”

Bussmann also aims her comic fury at many of the charities working in Uganda. She thinks they helped prop up a failing regime. Charities might point out that it is almost impossible to work in a country unless you are at least tolerated by the host government. It is easy for a maverick outsider to diagnose the ills; far harder to be a charity worker and cure them. “Look at the International Committee of the Red Cross. You can’t take the argument that you can’t piss off the people you are trying to work next to. The ICRC were aware of the death camps during the second world war but they didn’t speak up for that precise reason. You don’t work with these people: you call the cops.”

The charity projects that work, argues Bussmann, are “micro-financed”, accountable and transparent, and usually where small amounts of money are “given to women who need it and know what to do with it”. (One charity boss told her that 90% of women paid back loans whereas only 10% of men did.)

It would not be giving much away to say that Bussmann’s romantic quest – to bag Prendergast – ends in failure but she is actually quite coy about their meetings in her book. Did she ever seduce him? “We did go on a date. He might have been under the illusion it was an interview. I naively believed there was a moment when there was an ‘in’. Then I just looked at him and thought, you are so out of my league. He’s like Clooney, he belongs to the world so,” she sighs with jokey theatricality, “I let him go.” They met again last week at a conference in Washington. “He looked at me slightly differently when he saw me so I think he’s read the book. He looked slightly nervous.”

Before she wrote the book, Bussmann turned this extraordinary tale into a one-woman play, performing off Broadway and at the Edinburgh Festival. She has sold the film rights and is now working on the script. Given her contempt for Los Angeles, I am surprised when she says she is still living there. Why did she return? “Fuck knows.” Are there any good things about it? “The salads are huge. And old Hollywood – you feel you are surrounded by benevolent ghosts.”

Although she is planning to travel back to Africa to write a TV drama set in the Congo, she is still based in LA for her other work commitments. She is developing a sitcom and writing a book about her terrible dating experiences in California called Awful Nights. “I’ll do that and get the fuck out. I’m going to live in Nairobi. I’ve got it all planned.” Why Nairobi? Her answer is typical of Bussmann. “Lunatics. You don’t go a single day without an insane conversation”.

• The Worst Date Ever: War Crimes, Hollywood Heart-Throbs and Other Abominations is published by Macmillan at £12.99. Bussmann will be performing her show Bussmann’s Holiday at the Assembly Rooms, Edinburgh, from 24-30 August.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


In search of their feminine side

Can a show put on by two gay men really reflect what it’s like to be a woman? Maddy Costa finds out

By his own admission, theatre producer and nightclub promoter Simon Casson is not the kind of person one would expect to be involved in a cabaret extravaganza glorifying femininity. “The idea of femininity is quite scary to me,” he says. “In that way, I’m not unlike a lot of gay men, or men in general. I don’t want to get in touch with my feminine side.” Yet here he is, producing Gay Shame Goes Girly, at the Brixton Academy in London from tomorrow.

Satire is at the heart of Gay Shame, an annual event that Casson started in the mid-90s as a counterpoint to the increasingly commercialised Gay Pride. It was certainly the driving force last year when Gay Shame went “macho”, exploring masculinity and its mostly negative connotations. “It was all fighting, farting and football,” says Casson cheerfully. Robin Whitmore, the director and designer of Gay Shame, describes that night as: “A response to the very macho culture that the gay world has become, with the emphasis on body building, rough and unprotected sex, drugs and alcohol. We wanted to show it as brutal and aggressive – to exaggerate masculinity the way that a cartoonist might do.”

Gay Shame Goes Girly, by contrast, aims to be less belligerent, with a more complex mood. The 30-odd performance artists and theatre groups involved contemplate what it is to give birth or nurture someone, and invite audience members to participate in gentle pursuits, such as watercolour painting (of vaginas), cake-decorating and crochet. But there will be raucous, even violent elements, too: a chance to undergo an ersatz breast augmentation, attend a hen party or submit to a controlling, cane-wielding mother figure. But Whitmore’s overall aesthetic, inspired by Dior’s postwar New Look fashions and the photographs of Cecil Beaton, is “quite high glamour, beautiful actually”.

Whitmore accepts that the event is trading in a number of biological, domestic and even pre-feminist stereotypes. “But it’s not about male-female,” he argues, “it’s about what society does to that. ‘Femininity’ means something different for straight women, for gay women, for straight men and for gay men, and for people of different ages.” Casson thinks the audience will appreciate the chance to “play with all that archetypal feminine stuff. It’s great when those things become fodder for a nightclub to use as props, instead of trapping us and defining our existence.”

More than that, says Whitmore, many people “want to celebrate something that maybe has been stifled in their life”. A gay man born in the 50s, he long struggled with the received notion that boys should not be feminine. He recollects his childhood “sense of guilt about the fact that I had pink lacy curtains in my bedroom, and that I loved playing with dolls.

I would throw the doll across the room when my mum walked in, and pick up a car – even though she said: ‘You don’t have to do that.’”

Even now, says Casson, gay men who “show some feminine attributes get abused and objectified”. In an overwhelmingly macho culture, there is no longer a place for figures like the bouffant-and-cravat-sporting Quentin Crisp. “Gay men rejecting their nellie side, is that progress?” asks Casson. “I don’t think so.”

This interrogation of the relationship between femininity and homosexuality is
fascinating. Yet isn’t there something slightly odd about two gay men superintending an event dedicated to femininity? Amy Lamé thinks so. She is the compere for Gay Shame, but this year has demanded a more integral role. “I know gay men might like to think that they know what it’s like to be a woman, but they don’t,” she says.

Appointing herself Casson and Whitmore’s “femininity adviser”, she will ensure “an authentic feminine, lesbian voice” is prominent on the night. Lamé feels that femininity is misunderstood. “It isn’t about weakness. I think of femininity as a quiet strength that has been much under-appreciated. I see it as giving birth, as running small independent businesses, ie households.” That still ties feminine experience to biology and domesticity – but Lame is also suspicious of what she describes as “the nostalgification of femininity that has been happening in the past few years. It’s developed into this bizarre cult of cupcakes and crafts. I can’t say I don’t enjoy that, but I’m interested in feminist cupcakes, in radical knitting.” That’s why she is keen to expose the “gory side of an excessive idea of femininity, the primping and poking and physical monstrosities that women put themselves through”.

The element of the show Lame is most keenly anticipating is being put together by a (male) performance artist called Scottee, and is titled Abortive Tapestry. In one room, audience members will contribute stitches to a huge crocheted image – while in an adjacent room, backstreet abortions are enacted with knitting needles, as they were in the mid-20th century. “That’s the kind of rubbing up against ideas that I’m interested in,” says Lame. Yet this is the piece that Whitmore confesses makes him feel most nervous.

Lame also points out that, while effeminacy is outdated among gay men, overt femininity – the wearing of dresses and lipstick – is frequently rejected outright by gay women. She remembers how, on arriving in London from the US 15 years ago, she was turned away from lesbian clubs because: “I was wearing a skirt. I felt a real sense of rejection.”

Another Gay Shame performer, Karen Tom McLeod, similarly spent the 90s feeling as though “if you were a feminine-looking lesbian, you were second-rate. It was such a bizarre thing – it was almost misogynist.” It was so important to Lame and McLeod that Gay Shame address this “femme-phobia”, they arranged a private salon for Casson, Whitmore and a group of women to discuss femininity within the lesbian community. It proved so fruitful that Lame has set up two public debates on femininity (one each for men and women), to take place this month.

Working on the show has “really fired me up politically, and reignited my feminist spirit,” Lame says. “One of the hardest things about this project for me has been having two men in charge.” She has been rereading her feminist library and says: “Things haven’t come as far as we think.”

Whitmore is keen to incorporate a feminist agenda into Gay Shame: alongside Beaton, his other key reference point is the American feminist art group Guerrilla Girls. Yet, how different might Gay Shame Goes Girly look if women were in charge? “Cecil Beaton images are not my idea of femininity at all,” says McLeod. “The women look great but they’re in corsetry. It’s a male view of femininity.”

For all that she thinks of femininity as an inner quality, Lame knows that it is most often defined by a woman’s appearance. As such, she’s thinking carefully about what she is going to wear for Gay Shame. “It would be easy to wear a polka-dotted apron and be that cupcake-perfect image of a woman,” she says. “It’s more difficult to be confrontational, to show feminine strength.”

As for Casson, he is going to keep on suppressing his feminine side. “I will be wearing a skirt – but it’s very much a man’s skirt: discreet, black. Then again,” he ponders, “maybe it’s more feminine to be discreet”.

Gay Shame Goes Girly starts tomorrow. Box office: 0844 477 2000. For more information, visit duckie.co.uk.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Pension warnings go unheeded

• Women fall further behind in providing for the future
• A quarter of Britons have no private pension plan

Worries about the recession are causing people to ignore warnings about the pensions gap, with the number of people saving enough for an adequate income in retirement remaining static in the past year, according to a pension report published on Tuesday.

While the percentage of those saving adequate amounts has increased in the past year from 51% to 54%, the Scottish Widows UK Pensions report found the gender gap has increased, with only 47% of women saving enough compared with 59% of men. Women over the age of 50 have been hit hardest, with 5% fewer likely to have an adequate pension.

Ian Naismith, head of pensions market development for Scottish Widows, attributed the decline in women’s savings to the effect of the recession on household incomes: he believes they may be using money that could otherwise be saved to ensure their children are not adversely affected by spending cuts.

“Retirement is way down in most women’s priorities compared to providing for their families,” he said.

The survey, conducted by YouGov for Scottish Widows, questioned 5,000 people in the UK over the age of 30 and earning £10,000 a year or more.

Despite the level of pension savings increasing steadily year on year, one quarter of Britons do not expect to receive any income from a private pension, rising to 31% among those in households with earnings between £10,000 and £30,000. Among the self-employed, the figure was even higher, at 35%.

Even among those entitled to join a defined contribution company pension – where payouts are based on stockmarket performance – one in five have failed to take advantage of the fact their employer is likely to cover the running costs and make contributions on their behalf.

These findings are backed by a similar survey from the employee benefits company Foster Denovo, which found that more than a third of adults in Britain who are not already retired have not joined a personal or company pension scheme.

More than a quarter of people aged between 25 and 44 did not have any provisions – such as property, inheritance or savings – in place for retirement, while 11% of this age group said that they had not yet considered how they would cope financially at the end of their working life.

The survey also found that more than two-thirds (68%) of non-retired men in Britain have a pension, compared with 60% of women. Ian Bird, senior partner at Foster Denovo, said: “This figure is likely to be representative of women’s childcare commitments, but it is clearly an issue that the pensions industry must address. It needs to look at what support it can provide to reverse this trend.”

The government aims to increase the number of people saving for their retirement with the introduction of the personal account, a simple self-enrolment pension scheme run by employers, in 2012. But critics say that those on low incomes will struggle to escape the effects of the pension credit, a means-tested benefit designed to top up pensioners’ incomes, to £130 a week in the current tax year. The benefit is reduced by a taper for those with private pension savings.

Their claims are supported by the Scottish Widows’ report, which found that 32% of those aged 65 to 69 had been personally affected by means tests in retirement.

Even those who are managing to save sufficient amounts now are likely to fall back in the future as companies cut back on or close final-salary schemes. Ian Naismith said: “Of the 54% who are saving adequate amounts, two-thirds are in final-salary pension schemes, so their future prospects might not be so good.”

Last week 96% of companies (out of a sample of 156 questioned by the accountancy PricewaterhouseCoopers) said they thought tax changes had made final-salary schemes unsustainable in the future.

Despite the low interest rates of the last nine months, most people questioned by Scottish Widows thought cash ISAs were the safest form of investment, with 72% saying they were very or quite safe.

The survey found that people below the age of 30 now see cash savings, including ISAs, as the main way to ensure a reasonable standard of living in retirement.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


NHS restrictions prompt fertility tourism boom

Stringent NHS criteria for treatment force hundreds of women over the age of 40 to travel to clinics abroad, the first Europe-wide study of fertility tourism reveals

Hundreds of women over the age of 40 are travelling to fertility clinics in Europe to try to get pregnant because NHS clinics in the UK will not take them, the first-ever Europe-wide study of fertility tourism shows.

The research shows considerable movement across Europe, with women seeking out procedures that are banned in their own country. Italian women are crossing the border in droves following tough legal restrictions on IVF imposed in 2004, while large numbers of gay French women bypass a ban by seeking treatment in Belgium.

Francoise Shenfield from University College hospital in London, who co-ordinated the study, said at the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) conference in Amsterdam that it appeared at least 20,000 to 25,000 cross-border fertility treatments were carried out each year. While one woman might have more than one treatment, there are still many thousands seeking help to get pregnancy abroad.

Hundreds are thought to be travelling from the UK every month. The most popular destinations for UK women are the Czech Republic and Spain, the top locations for obtaining donated eggs. As women get older, their eggs are fewer, and less likely to fertilise and implant in the womb. Donated eggs can be their only chance, but they are in short supply in the UK, where the rules say donors can only be given expenses up to £250. A further disincentive has been the rule change to help a child discover the identity of the donor when he or she is 18.

In Spain, by contrast, the ceiling on compensation is 900 euros and in the Czech Republic women receive 500 euros. Of the women in the study leaving the UK for treatment, 53% went to the Czech Republic and 28% went to Spain.

Dr Shenfield said that, although the UK had some of the most liberal fertility laws in Europe, there were “all kinds of barriers” to treatment on the NHS, including age and waiting lists. Private treatment is very expensive. “They might find it is cheaper to go somewhere else,” she said. “London is still one of the most expensive capitals in the whole of Europe.”

Infertility Network UK confirmed that many couples consider travelling because they cannot get help at home. An online survey of over 300 patients last year found that 76% would consider going abroad. The vast majority of those who went (88%) were happy with their treatment. Chief executive Clare Lewis-Jones said many patients could not get NHS care because they did not fit the “extremely tight access criteria applied by many of the PCTs”.

Couples are finding clinics in Europe on the internet and even in adverts in airline magazines, she said. “I don’t think it is stoppable. There is no ethical reason why it should be stopped, because it enhances the autonomy of patients. But we must concentrate on the information and make it even safer for our patients,” she said.

One of her concerns was that women would have several embryos transferred in a European clinic, where in the UK the move is to have just one. Multiple pregnancies are riskier, especially for the babies who may be premature and need intensive care. “We know that women will come back with problems,” she said.

The willingness of women to donate their eggs in countries with higher levels of compensation payments was a very important ethical issue, she added. “Young women may not be well enough counselled about what it means to donate eggs,” she said. “The risks are very little but there is the psychology of it all – realising 10 years later when one is a bit more mature what it means to give some of your genetic input, whether you are a man or a woman.”

The study was carried out in six countries during the course of one month – Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Slovenia, Spain and Switzerland – where foreign patients in fertility clinics were given questionnaires about their trip. A total of 1,230 forms were completed. The biggest proportions were from Italy (31.8%), Germany (14.4%), the Netherlands (12.1%) and France (8.7%).

Most travelled to bypass legal restrictions, but 34% of those from the UK said they went abroad because of difficulties of access to treatment. The average age was over 37 but 63.5% of the British patients were over 40.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds